07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
Post on 03-Jun-2018
240 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 1/16
CAVITATION CORROSION BEHAVIOUR OF CARBON STEEL, AL-BRONZE AND
COBALT-BASED ALLOY IN SEAWATER
A. Al-Hashem, H.Tarish and A. Akbar
Petroleum Research & Studies Center
Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research
P.O.Box 24885,13109, Safat, Kuwait
ahashem@prsc.kisr.edu.kw
ABSTRACT
An ultrasonically induced cavitation facility was used to study the cavitation corrosion behavior of
carbon steel (UNS G10200), Al-Bronze (UNS C95300), and cobalt-based alloy (UNS R30006) in
seawater. The work included measurements of free corrosion potentials, and mass loss in presence and
absence of cavitation. The cavitation tests were made at a frequency of 20 KHz and at temperatures of 250C. Cavitation conditions caused a noble shift in the free corrosion potential for carbon steel and an
active one for Al-Bronze and cobalt-based alloys. Cavitation also increased the rate of mass loss of these
alloys by several orders of magnitude with respect to stagnant conditions. Cavitation made the surface
of these alloys very rough, exhibiting large cavity pits in the middle region of the attacked area as
revealed by the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Mechanical factors were determined to be theleading cause of metal loss.
Keywords: Cavitation, corrosion, carbon steel, Al-Bronze, Stellite 6B, seawater, Free corrosion-
potential.
INTRODUCTIONIn this investigation, the cavitation corrosion behavior of carbon steel (UNS G10200), Al-Bronze
(UNS C95300), and a cobalt-based alloy, Stellite 6B(1)
(UNS R30006) in seawater was studied. This
study was conducted in our laboratory due to repeated failures of valves and pumps in seawater systems
of refineries and petrochemical plants in Kuwait1-4
. The cause of such failures was attributed tocavitation-erosion, erosion corrosion and under-deposit corrosion. However, in this investigation, the
results of laboratory cavitation studies made on the above mentioned alloys will be summarized.
Cavitation damage is a form of localized attack found on many types of materials
exposed to turbulent flows. Although mainly mechanical in nature, this type of damage(1) Stellite 6B is a trade name of Deloro Stellite Inc.
is more severe in mediums where the cavitation mechanism acts synergistically with corrosion5 -6. The
mechanical action of cavitation usually attacks protective surfaces, exposing un-protective ones to
corrosion. Cavitation is often defined as the growth and collapse of vapor bubbles because of local
1
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
07253
Paper No.
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s). The material presented and the views expressed in this paper aresolely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association. Printed in the U.S.A.
Copyright
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 2/16
pressure fluctuations in a liquid. If the pressure suddenly falls below the vapor pressure, these bubbles
then collapse violently when they are submitted to a higher pressure. This collapse is accompanied by
the sudden flow of liquid, which imposes stress pulses capable of causing plastic deformation on solid
surfaces7.
Selection of corrosion resistant materials depends on a better understanding of materials response
to corrosive liquids and cavitation stresses. Therefore, continuous reappraisal of proposed materials of
construction is necessary to confirm that the least expensive material, which will still fully satisfy the
requirements of the service, has been selected.
EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
Apparatus
The vibratory apparatus used for this test method works at a frequency of 20 kHz and peak-to-
peak amplitude of 25 m. This test method produces axial oscillations of a test specimen inserted to a
specified depth in the test liquid. The vibrations are generated by a magnetostrictive or piezoelectric
transducer, driven by a suitable electronic oscillator and power amplifier. Figure 1 shows a schematic
view of such an apparatus.
Material
Specimens were cut from 15mm rods of UNS G10200, UNS C95300, and UNS R30006. Each
specimen had a diameter of 1.59 cm and a thickness of about 0.27 cm. Before experimental testing,
specimens were mechanically polished with silicon carbide papers up to 1200 grit. For morphologicalexamination, some specimens were etched before testing to reveal their microstructure. Two specimens
of each alloy were tested. The test specimens were fixed on a special holder which was placed at a
distance of 0.125 cm from the apparatus horn. At the end of each cavitation test, detailed morphological
examinations were carried out on the specimens. The optical microscope and scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) were used to identify the initiation and mode of damage in addition to the role played by the constituent phases of the alloy.
Test Solution
The chemical composition of the seawater used in this study is shown in Table 1. The seawater was contained in an open 600 ml glass beaker surrounded by a copper coil in a water bath. Inside the
beaker, the seawater was maintained at 251C.
RESULTS
Mass Loss of UNS G10200
Figure 2 shows the cumulative mass loss and rate of mass loss of UNS G10200 versus exposure
time for this alloy in seawater at 250C. A gradual increase in mass loss with time was observed for this
specimen with a very small incubation period in seawater at the testing temperature and a sharp increase
in mass loss occurred for the same specimen after 5 h of testing as shown in Figure 2a. This behavior has also been reflected for rate of mass loss for this specimen where a sharp increase (accumulation
2
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 3/16
period) has occurred in the seawater at 250C reaching a maximum value of 0.00325 g/h and then
decreasing (attenuation period) after 5 h of cavitation where it reached steady state value of 0.00025 g/h
at the end of testing as shown in Figure 2b.
Mass Loss of UNS C95300
Figure 3 shows the cumulative mass loss and rate of mass loss versus exposure time for this alloy in
seawater at 250C. A steady gradual increase in mass loss with time was observed for this alloy with an
incubation period of 2.5 h in seawater at the testing temperature as shown in Figure 3a. This behavior has also been reflected for rate of mass loss for this specimen where a sharp increase (accumulation
period) has occurred in the seawater at 25oC reaching a maximum value of 0.00050 g/h and then
decreasing (attenuation period) after 1h of cavitation where it reached steady state value of 0.00010 g/h
at the end of testing as shown in Figure 3b.
Mass Loss of UNS R30006
Figure 4 shows the cumulative mass loss and rate of mass loss versus exposure time for this alloy in
seawater at 250C. A very steady small gradual increase in mass loss with time was observed for this
alloy with an incubation period of about 11 h in seawater at the testing temperature as shown in Figure
4a. This behavior has also been reflected for rate of mass loss for this specimen where a very slightincrease (accumulation period) has occurred in the seawater at 25C reaching a maximum value of
0.00010 g/h and then decreasing (attenuation period) after 1h of cavitation where it reached steady state
value of 0.00001 g/h at the end of testing as shown in Figure 4b.
General Observation on the Rate of Mass Loss
In order to compare the cavitation erosion performance of the three alloys in the seawater at 250C,
many investigators6,7
recommend comparing rate of mass loss in the steady state period of the curves.
Initial rate of mass loss is affected by many factors such as the type of alloy, aging temperature, surfaceinhomogenuities, alloy microstructure and the surface of a sample. Therefore, the steady state or semi-
steady state period will be considered as a measure of the erosion performance of each type of alloy.Based on the steady state rate of mass loss values, the performance of the three alloys is as follows:
UNS R30006 › UNS C95300 › UNS G10200 in seawater at 250C. It was observed that the rate of mass
loss values tend to converge to relatively close values at the end of cavitation testing inspite of the initialdifferences in the rate of mass loss.
Electrochemical Measurements
Potential-time Measurements of the Investigated Alloys
Figure 5 shows the potential-time measurements for carbon steel in seawater under stagnant and
cavitation conditions. As shown in Figure 5, the open circuit (OC)-potential of carbon steel was morenegative (active) under stagnant conditions compared with that under cavitations conditions. A shift of
120 mV towards the noble direction was observed for carbon steel upon the introduction of cavitationsconditions.
Figure 6, b shows the OC-potential versus time for Al-bronze in distilled, sea and formation
waters under stagnant and cavitation conditions. As shown in Figure 5, the OC-potential began with a
less negative value above 200 mV under stagnant conditions. However, it immediately shifted towards a
more negative value upon the introduction of cavitation conditions to the sample. This occurs in the
3
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 4/16
three different solutions with slightly varying initial and final values. The OC-potential becomes less
negative if cavitation conditions are no longer imposed on the sample.
Figure 7 shows the potential-time measurements for UNS R30006 in distilled, sea and
formation water under stagnant and cavitation conditions. Figure 7 indicates that the OC-potential of UNS R30006 begins with a less negative value under stagnant conditions and then immediately shifts
towards more negative (active) direction upon the imposition of cavitation condition. The approximate
value of the negative shift for UNS R30006 potential under cavitation conditions is 70 mV. The OC-
potential of UNS R30006 returned to less negative values when cavitation conditions were lifted.
General Observations about the Electrochemical Measurements.The OC-potential versus time for all the alloys investigated started with a less negative (noble)
value under stagnant conditions compared with their potential values under cavitation conditions with
the exception of carbon steel. The OC-potential behavior of carbon steel under the cycle of stagnation-
cavitation-stagnation versus time was opposite to those observed for the rest of the alloys in the threesolutions.
Assessment of Surface Damage
Figure 8 shows SEM micrographs revealing the specimen surface of UNS G10200 after 35 h of cavitation with randomly scattered cavity pits. Figure 8 a, b and c shows an area at the edge of the
cavitation attacked region at different magnifications. Several cavity pits of different sizes are shown in
the previous micrographs as well as a plastically deformation in the attacked region. Figure 8d shows a
plastically deformed region including both large cavity pits as well as small micro-cavities.
Figure 9 shows SEM micrographs of UNS C95300 after 35 h of cavitation in seawater. Figure 9a
shows a portion of the specimen with an attacked and un-attacked surface of this alloy revealing large
and small cavities. Figures 9b, c and d show a plastically deformed region of UNS C95300 covered with
both large and small micro-cavities. In addition, ductile tearing and grain boundary attack were also
observed under cavitation condition. The presence of cavities and ductile tearing is readily explainable
in terms of the known devastating effects of cavitation. On the other hand, the presence of grain boundary attack (i.e., corrosion of the boundaries of columnar grains) indicates that electrochemical
dissolution due to structural heterogeneity is indeed contributing in the surface damage during
cavitation.
Figure 10 shows SEM micrographs of UNS R30006 after 63 h of cavitation in seawater. Figure
10a show the edge of an intact surface and that of an attacked region of plastically deformed surface as a
result of the cavitation action. Figures 10b,c and d also show the microstructure of this alloy at higher
magnifications revealing the carbides of Cr 7C3 and W6C in a cobalt-rich matrix. . Figure 10 c and d
clearly show the carbides are selectively eroded while the carbide-matrix interface acts as an initiatingsite for erosion. Also material is lost, to a lesser extent, from twin intersections in the cobalt-rich matrix
phase of this alloy.
DISCUSSION
Cavitation damage is associated with components that are being driven at high velocity through a
fluid, for example propellers, impellers, water turbines, valves and pumps. Numerous studies4-7
have
been made on cavitation. Reports8-10
have been published which show that both mechanical and
4
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 5/16
electrochemical factors are involved. Cavitation may be defined as the growth and collapse of vapor
bubbles due to localized pressure changes in a liquid. The bubbles are formed in the liquid in regions of
very low pressure, for example, behind the leading edge of a propeller blade. The collapse process takes
place extremely rapidly, producing a strong shock wave that damages the material. Because a fewmillions of bubbles may collapse in a second, damage quickly occurs.
Results of the corrosion potential versus time tests indicated that cavitation caused a rapid
positive shift for carbon steel and negative shift in the free-corrosion potential for Al-Bronze and cobalt-
base alloys, which increased slightly during the cavitation period. The potential shift for Al-Bronze andcobalt-base alloys quickly reversed when cavitation was stopped, suggesting reformation of the
protective oxide layer on the surface of these alloys.
In the present study, cavitation made the specimen surface very rough, containing many cavities
(Figures 8-10). The impact of loading, which is a series of discrete events occurring in a time frame of microseconds, produces relatively high stress and strains in the metal surface. The cumulative effect
will lead to the formation of fatigue cracks. These cracks intersect causing small fragments of the metal
surface to be dislodged, leaving the surface in a spongy, porous condition11-13.
The exceptional cavitation erosion resistance of the UNS R30006 alloy can be attributed to the
drastic changes in mechanical properties brought about by the formation of mechanical twins and by the presence of platelets of the epsilon (E) HCP phase.
Woodford14
in 1971 in his metallographic studies of cobalt base alloys, postulated the concept of
stacking fault energy (SFE) as a key factor in the cavitation resistance of an alloy rather than itshardness. SFE is a measure of the resistance to dislocation motion on a microscopic scale and directly
related to the ability to work harden, which is key to improved cavitation resistance. Reduced SFE is
associated with increased cycles to nucleate a crack in high cycle fatigue, which is the mechanism
producing metal loss in cavitation11
. Figure 8-10 shows that this mechanism applied to these alloys
where metal loss occurs due to the formation of micro-cracks as a result of the high cycle fatigue.
CONCLUSIONS
The ultrasonically induced cavitation conditions on carbon steel, Al-Bronze and cobalt-basedalloys in seawater at 25oC resulted in the following:
1. An increase in mass loss and in the rate of mass loss with exposure time for the three
alloys.
2. A shift in the OC-potential towards the less negative direction for UNS G10200 and
towards the more negative direction for UNS C95300 and UNS R30006.3. The formation of rough surfaces for the three alloys, containing small and large
cavities as well as plastically deformed regions.
4. The creation of cyclic stresses which are considered to be the main cause of metal lossin these three alloys.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the Kuwait Foundation for the
Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) under Contract Number (2002-14-01).
5
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 6/16
REFERENCES
1. A. Al-Hashem and J. Carew, "Consultancy Services for Laboratory and Onsite Studies for theFinalization of the Process and Process Design Parameters of Seawater Injection Project, North
Kuwait", KISR Report No. 4808, August, (1995).
2. A. Al-Hashem,K. Al-Muhanna and M. Salman, "Consultancy Services for the Laboratory Studies
for Effluent Disposal West Kuwait", Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR) Report No.
4809, December, (1995).3. V. K. Gouda; A. H. Al-Hashem; A. M. Abdullah and W. T. Riad, "Effect of Ultrasonically
Induced Cavitation on the Behaviour of Nodular Cast Iron in Seawater" Br. Corros. J., 26, 2,
(1991): p. 109.
4. A. Al-Hashem, H. Tarish, and J. Carew, “The Effect of Ultrasonically Induced Cavitation
Conditions on the Behavior of Copper and Nickel Based Alloys in Seawater”, CORROSION/06, paper No. 299 (NACE International, Houston, Tx, 2006).
5. J. M. Hobbs in Erosion by Cavitation or Impingement, STP 408; Philadelphia PA, ASM (1967): p.
159.
6. T. McGuiness and A., Thijuvengadam in Erosion Wear and Interfaces with Corrosion, STP 567:
P. Philadelphia, PA, ASTM. (1974), 30.
7. VC. M. Preece. Cavitation Erosion, in Treatise on Material Science and Technology. Vol. 16, C.M. Preece, ed. New York, NY: Academic Press, (1979), p. 249.
8. R. L. Chance in Engine Collant Testing, State of Art, (ed. W. H. Ailor), STP 705: Philadelphia,
PA, ASTM (1980), p. 270.
9. A. H. Al-Hashem, H. M. Shalaby and V. K. Gouda, Proc. 12th
Int. Cong. On Metallic Corrosion,Sept. 19 - 24, Vol. 5B, p. 3600, Houston, Texas, (1993).
10. J. G. Auret, O.F.R. Damm, G. J. Wright and F.P.A. Robinson, Corrosion 49, 11: p. 910, (1993).
11. C. McCaul, "An Advanced Cavitation Resistant Austenitic Stainless Steel for Pumps"
CORROSION/96, paper No. 415 (NACE International, Houston, Tx, 1996).
12. A. R. Marder and G. Krauss, "Hardenability concepts with Applications to Steel," AIMEPublication, (1978), p. 238.
13. C. J. Heathcock, B. E. Protheroe, and A. Ball, Wear, 80, (1982), pp. 311 - 327.14. D. A. Woodward, "Cavitation Induced Phase Transformation in Alloys", Metall. Trans3, (1972),
p. 1137.
6
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 7/16
TABLE 1.
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ARABIAN GULF SEAWATER COMPARED WITH
SYNTHETIC SEAWATER (ppm).
Parameter Synthetic*
Seawater
Arabian Gulf Seawater at
Doha Plant
(ppm SD)
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Calcium
Chloride
Sulfate
Bicarbonate
Carbonate
Total Hydrocarbon
TDS
PH
10768
1297
388
408
19360
2702
143
-
35146
-
-
12,300 20
1700 150
470 20
570 45
24,000 700
3400 300
185 18
14 8
0.204
47,000 2000
8.2 0.1
* Seawater as prepared by the hydrographic laboratories of Copenhagen, Denmark
SD = Standard Deviation
7
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 8/16
Figure 1. Schematic of Vibratory Cavitation Test Apparatus.
8
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 9/16
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 10/16
Al-Bronze ( 25 o
C)
0.00000
0.00500
0.01000
0.01500
0.02000
0.02500
0.03000
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (Hrs)
M a s s L o s s ( g m )
(a)
Al-Bronze ( 25 o
C)
0.00000
0.00010
0.00020
0.00030
0.00040
0.00050
0.00060
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (Hrs)
(b)
Figure 3. Typical cumulative mass loss and rates of mass loss of UNS C70600 specimen exposed to
sea water at 25oC.
10
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 11/16
Stellite 6B ( 25 o
C)
0.00000
0.00200
0.00400
0.00600
0.00800
0.01000
0.01200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (Hrs)
M a s s L o s s ( g m )
(a)
Stellite 6B ( 25 o
C)
0.00000
0.00001
0.00002
0.00003
0.00004
0.00005
0.00006
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (Hrs)
(b)
Figure 4. Typical cumulative mass loss and rates of mass loss of UNS R30006 specimen exposed to
sea water at 25o
C.
11
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 12/16
Figure 5.The effect of cavitation conditions on the free-corrosion potential of UNS G10200 in
seawater at 25oC.
Figure 6.The effect of cavitation conditions on the free-corrosion potential of UNS C95300 in
seawater at 25oC.
12
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 13/16
Figure 7.The effect of cavitation conditions on the free-corrosion potential of UNS R30006 in
seawater at 25oC.
13
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 14/16
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 8. SEM micrograph of the surface of UNS G10200 after 35 h of cativation
in seawater at 25oC showing dispersed cavities.
14
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 15/16
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 9. SEM micrograph of the surface of UNS C95300 after 35 h of cativation
in seawater at 25oC showing dispersed cavities.
15
Jesus Arze - Invoice INV-241230-JLBL2V, downloaded on 9/6/2009 7:36:19 AM - Single-user license only, copying and networking prohibited.
8/12/2019 07253 cavitation corrosion.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/07253-cavitation-corrosionpdf 16/16
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 10. SEM micrograph of the surface of UNS R30006 after 63 h of cativation in seawater at
25oC showing dispersed cavities.
16
top related