بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. population covered by donor usaid 34% adb 1% uncovered 23...

بسم الله بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم الرحمن الرحيم

Population Covered by DonorPopulation Covered by Donor

USAID 34%ADB 1%

Uncovered23%

Others2%

EC 18%

WB 22%

Action Plan forAction Plan for Evaluation and Evaluation and

Implementation of Implementation of Curriculum Development Curriculum Development

in KMUin KMU

Evaluation of Practical work in Evaluation of Practical work in Biochemistry DepartmentBiochemistry Department

By :By :

Assistant Prof. Wasima SharifiAssistant Prof. Wasima Sharifi

Department of Bio-Chemistry, KMUDepartment of Bio-Chemistry, KMU

December 2006December 2006

BackgroundBackground

Paraclinic subjects are taught in PCB, Paraclinic subjects are taught in PCB, 11stst and 2 and 2ndnd class completely , and class completely , and beside that some subjects in grade beside that some subjects in grade 33rdrd, 4, 4thth, and 5, and 5thth are also included. are also included.

Practical work is an important part of Practical work is an important part of teaching method in Paraclinic (40%)teaching method in Paraclinic (40%)

Evaluation is necessary for feedback Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planningfor teachers and future planning

Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments

Using Microscopes:Using Microscopes: BiologyBiology Parasitological Parasitological Pathology Pathology Histology Histology MicrobiologyMicrobiology

Chemistry:Chemistry: Chemistry Chemistry BiochemistryBiochemistry

Anatomy Modules:Anatomy Modules: AnatomyAnatomy EmbryologyEmbryology Forensic MedicineForensic Medicine

Others:Others: PhysiologyPhysiology PharmacologyPharmacology Public healthPublic health PhysicsPhysics

Practical work room.

AnatomyModels

Practical work room.

Strengths Strengths EDC/JICA EDC/JICA Initiation of teachers for the task Initiation of teachers for the task Better background for future Planning Better background for future Planning

WeaknessesWeaknesses Absence of evaluation experienceAbsence of evaluation experience Difficulty of skill evaluation factDifficulty of skill evaluation fact

OpportunitiesOpportunities Assistance of JICAAssistance of JICA Eager for better Education system in Eager for better Education system in

KMU KMU A comprehensive and scientific planning A comprehensive and scientific planning

for futurefor future

ThreatsThreats Sustainability of the program?Sustainability of the program? Miss collection and miss interpretationMiss collection and miss interpretation

GoalGoal

Improvement of teaching system Improvement of teaching system

ObjectivesObjectives Standardization of teaching methodStandardization of teaching method Strengthening of weak points Strengthening of weak points

MethodsMethods

Time:Time: May 2007May 2007 Mid semester, 2 Mid semester, 2

weeksweeks Class 2Class 2ndnd students students

Random 20 studentsRandom 20 students Distribution, Distribution,

collection and collection and analysis:analysis: Dr Sharifi, Prof Anwar, Dr Sharifi, Prof Anwar,

Prof AhmadzaiProf Ahmadzai

Items in the Items in the questionnairequestionnaire PunctualityPunctuality SkillSkill KnowledgeKnowledge General impressionGeneral impression

Scoring:Scoring: Satisfactory, fair and not Satisfactory, fair and not

fairfair PercentagePercentage

Arigato GozaimasuArigato Gozaimasu

Thank youThank youSharifiSharifi

Evaluation of Paraclinic Evaluation of Paraclinic lecturers lecturers

By:By:

Associated Prof. Ehsanullah Alimi MDAssociated Prof. Ehsanullah Alimi MD

Head, Department of Forensic Head, Department of Forensic MedicineMedicine

December 2006December 2006

IntroductionIntroduction

Feedback by students for Feedback by students for standardization of education standardization of education

Total no. of lecturers in KMUTotal no. of lecturers in KMU 217217 ClinicClinic 151151 ParaclinicParaclinic 6666

Total no. of departmentsTotal no. of departments 3333 ClinicClinic 1919 ParaclinicParaclinic 1414

Introduction Introduction (cont.)(cont.)

Criteria for selection of lecturersCriteria for selection of lecturers MD and higher degreesMD and higher degrees 75% Scoring in undergraduate period75% Scoring in undergraduate period No failure records in undergraduate No failure records in undergraduate

periodperiod Age ( < 35 )Age ( < 35 ) Recommendation by related DepartmentRecommendation by related Department Academic entrance examAcademic entrance exam Approval of Academic council of KMUApproval of Academic council of KMU Assignment by MOHEAssignment by MOHE

Current SituationCurrent Situation

EDC has already collected evaluation EDC has already collected evaluation data for all lecturers in August 2006data for all lecturers in August 2006

The data has not been analyzed The data has not been analyzed because of unknown reasonbecause of unknown reason

WeaknessesWeaknesses

Some negative reaction from Some negative reaction from lecturers lecturers

Absence of evaluation experienceAbsence of evaluation experience Students will evaluate lecturers in Students will evaluate lecturers in

views of reputation (e.g. Strictness views of reputation (e.g. Strictness will be connected to lower will be connected to lower evaluation)evaluation)

GoalGoal Improvement of teaching system Improvement of teaching system

ObjectivesObjectives Standardization of teaching methodStandardization of teaching method Strengthening of lecturers’ weak points Strengthening of lecturers’ weak points Motivation of lecturersMotivation of lecturers Capacity building for lecturersCapacity building for lecturers

MethodsMethods Modification of the current Modification of the current

questionnairequestionnaire Every end of semester Every end of semester Scoring (Good, Fair and not fair)Scoring (Good, Fair and not fair) Calculation of percentageCalculation of percentage Sampling of studentsSampling of students

Sampling method:Sampling method: 30 students, randomized 30 students, randomized

Example of a LectureExample of a Lecture

Implementation ProcessesImplementation Processes

3 groups of 10 students will be 3 groups of 10 students will be selected arbitrarily from 100 2selected arbitrarily from 100 2ndnd class class studentsstudents

10 lecturers in 4 departments 10 lecturers in 4 departments (biochem, physio, microbio, and (biochem, physio, microbio, and pathology) will be evaluatedpathology) will be evaluated

ResourcesResources Personnel:Personnel:

EDC evaluation committee and administrationEDC evaluation committee and administration Academic Vice ChancellorAcademic Vice Chancellor StudentsStudents

Time:Time: Collection: One week in the end of each Collection: One week in the end of each

semester (July 2007)semester (July 2007) Analysis: Quantitative (percentage) by Drs. Analysis: Quantitative (percentage) by Drs.

Alimi, Stanikzai, and Anwar.Alimi, Stanikzai, and Anwar. Dr. Alimi will report the result to the chancellor, Dr. Alimi will report the result to the chancellor,

EDC and JICA project office in August 2007EDC and JICA project office in August 2007

Suggestion Suggestion

All lecturers should be evaluated All lecturers should be evaluated every year regularlyevery year regularly

Students manual for evaluationStudents manual for evaluation

Arigato GozaimasuArigato Gozaimasu

Thank youThank youAlimiAlimi

Assessment of studentAssessment of student

By:By:

Prof. Mohammad Afzal Anwar MDProf. Mohammad Afzal Anwar MD

Head, Department of HistologyHead, Department of Histology

December 2006December 2006

IntroductionIntroduction

Total no. of studentsTotal no. of students 27452745 FacultiesFaculties 44

CurativeCurative PediatricPediatric StomatologyStomatology NursingNursing

Condition to sit in an examinationCondition to sit in an examination Student attendance Student attendance 75%75%

Evaluation of students in end Evaluation of students in end of semesterof semester

Final Examination

Practical Examination)20%(

Theoretical Examination

)80%(

Current StatusCurrent Status

Different departments have different Different departments have different formats of examination papersformats of examination papers Combination of MCQs, SAQs, Essays, etcCombination of MCQs, SAQs, Essays, etc Distribution of marks to different Distribution of marks to different

sectionssections Different departments show different Different departments show different

failure rates of studentsfailure rates of students

Result of Final ExaminationResult of Final Examination100( absolute score)

Failed Students

Succeeded Students

0

50( in old system)

Failed Student

subject subject subject

Second ChanceFailed Student

(next year)

subjectsubject

Third chanceFailed Student

(next year)

Current System Used for 2nd Class or Upper

(Not the Credit System)

Result of Final ExaminationResult of Final Examination100( absolute score)

Failed Students

Succeeded Students

0

55% in credit system

Introduction Introduction (cont.)(cont.)

Credit system and conditions:Credit system and conditions: Currently used for PCB and 1Currently used for PCB and 1stst class class One chance for examOne chance for exam

If failed, must take tutorialIf failed, must take tutorial Pass score for a subject in credit system Pass score for a subject in credit system

is 55is 55 The average of all subject scores for The average of all subject scores for

credit system is 60credit system is 60

GoalGoal Improvement of examination system Improvement of examination system

ObjectivesObjectives Standardization of teaching methodStandardization of teaching method Detection of examination weak points Detection of examination weak points Improvement of questioning systemImprovement of questioning system

MethodsMethods

Collection of papers from different Collection of papers from different departmentsdepartments Decide which method was used for each Decide which method was used for each

paper (MCQ, SAQ, Essay, etc)paper (MCQ, SAQ, Essay, etc) Collection of dataCollection of data

How many students failedHow many students failed How marks were decided for each How marks were decided for each

questionquestion

ResourcesResources

Personnel:Personnel: Dr. Anwar Dr. Anwar Examination committeeExamination committee KMU administrationKMU administration

Time:Time: End of each semesterEnd of each semester

Arigato GozaimasuArigato Gozaimasu

Thank youThank youProf AnwarProf Anwar

Evaluation for Practical works Evaluation for Practical works in Clinical Educationin Clinical Education

By:By:

Assistant Prof. Ghulam Sakhi Rawan Assistant Prof. Ghulam Sakhi Rawan MDMD

Department of Pediatrics, Maiwand Department of Pediatrics, Maiwand HospitalHospital

December 2006December 2006

BackgroundBackground

Clinical Practical works are taught in class Clinical Practical works are taught in class 33rdrd, 4, 4thth, 5, 5thth, and house job (internship), and house job (internship)

Practical work is an important part of Practical work is an important part of teaching method in clinic (40%)teaching method in clinic (40%)

Evaluation is necessary for feedback for Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planningteachers and future planning

practical works:practical works: StudentsStudents 4 hours/day4 hours/day House jobHouse job 7 hours/day for a year7 hours/day for a year

Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments

class 3class 3rdrd:: Physical examinationPhysical examination ThermometerThermometer SphygmomanometerSphygmomanometer StethoscopeStethoscope Tongue depressorTongue depressor Performing IM,SC and IV InjectionsPerforming IM,SC and IV Injections

Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments

(cont.)(cont.) Class 4Class 4thth : :

Physical examinationPhysical examination ThermometerThermometer SphygmomanometerSphygmomanometer StethoscopeStethoscope FetoscopeFetoscope NG and rectal tubes and folly catheterNG and rectal tubes and folly catheter Reading X-Ray filmsReading X-Ray films History takingHistory taking

Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments

(cont.)(cont.) Class 5Class 5thth : :

OtoscopeOtoscope OphthalmoscopeOphthalmoscope LaryngoscopeLaryngoscope BronchoscopeBronchoscope Casting Casting Traction and fixation of fracturesTraction and fixation of fractures PuncturesPunctures History takingHistory taking Introduction of diseases Introduction of diseases

Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments

(cont.)(cont.)

Note: Students are able to do some Note: Students are able to do some practical works by themselves but practical works by themselves but they will only observe other works. they will only observe other works.

House Job:House Job: Practical works as junior assistant/every Practical works as junior assistant/every

dept.dept. Skin suturingSkin suturing DressingDressing

Current StatusCurrent Status

Some lecturers lack enough skills to Some lecturers lack enough skills to teachteach

Some lecturers are not punctualSome lecturers are not punctual

GoalGoal Improvement of Practical works in Improvement of Practical works in

Clinical EducationClinical Education

ObjectivesObjectives

Standardization of practical worksStandardization of practical works Strengthening of weak points in Strengthening of weak points in

clinical worksclinical works

MethodsMethods Who: Dr. RawanWho: Dr. Rawan To whom: 5To whom: 5thth class students, 10 class students, 10

groupsgroups When: March-June 2007When: March-June 2007 How:How:

Interview with studentsInterview with students Observation by Dr. RawanObservation by Dr. Rawan

Methods Methods (cont.)(cont.)

Format of interview questionsFormat of interview questions TeachersTeachers

PunctualityPunctuality AttitudeAttitude SkillSkill KnowledgeKnowledge AppearanceAppearance

StudentsStudents AttendanceAttendance

InterestInterest KnowledgeKnowledge AttitudeAttitude skillsskills

Arigato GozaimasuArigato Gozaimasu

Thank youThank you Assistant Prof. RawanAssistant Prof. Rawan