Ана Пройкова, доц. д-р Национално контактно лице, 6РП...
Post on 18-Jan-2016
77 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Шеста рамкова програма (2002-2006)
Приоритетна тема: Наука за наноразмерното състояние, материали и производство
(НаноМатПро)
Ана Пройкова, доц. д-рНационално контактно лице, 6РП
Софийски университет, Физически факултет
22.11.2006
Съдържание
• Разходи ‘НаноМатПро’ (2002-2006)• Разпределение на проектите по инструменти• Финансово разпределение по инструменти• Статистика (2003 &2004)• Текущи проекти (Март 2006)• Поглед към 7ма рамкова програма
• Общо 386 проекта са финансирани с 1,880 M€ • Разходи за експерти, конференции, и др. 4.9 M€
• Първоначално предвидени средства (ЕС) 1,300 M€
• Разходи на ЕС (09/2006) 1,457 M€ (EU-25 + AELE + Third Countries)
SSA339%
CA164%
IP61
16%
IP-SME349%
NoE226%
STRP22056%
Distribution of projects by type for FP6-NMP
269 “traditional” instruments (STRP, SSA, CA)117 “new” instruments (IP/NoE) with 29% specific for SME
STREP438,4630%
SSA15,531%
CA15,571%
IP624,1444%
IP-SME187,9413%
NoE157,2211%
Fund distribution by project type for FP6-NMP
470 M€ for “traditional” instruments (STRP, SSA, CA)969 M€ for “new” instruments (IP/NoE) with 19% specific for SME
Overview of the implementation of Priority 3 per call
Year (call/ deadline)
Call ID Overall number of
projects
Indicative amount in call (M€)
Committed funds (M€)
Joint calls priority 2 (IST) and priority 3 (NMP)
2002/03 FP6-2002-IST-NMP-1 8 35 41.6
2004/05 FP6-2004-IST-NMP-2 31 90 87.7
Main calls (all instruments) 2002/03 FP6-2002-NMP-1 118 400 461.3
(STREP, SSA, CA) 2003/04 FP6-2003-NMP-TI-3-Main 68 105 115.2 FP6-2004-NMP-TI-4 67 120 116.9
(IP, NoE) 2003/04 FP6-2003-NMP-NI-3 23 245 242.8
FP6-2004-NMP-NI-4 21 150 157.5
Specific calls for SME (IP for SME)
2002/03 FP6-2002-NMP-2 7 40 36.4
2003/04 FP6-2003-NMP-SME-3 12 80 69.9
FP6-2004-SME-4 15 100 81.7
Other specific calls Coordinated call with
CECA 2003/04 FP6-2003-NMP-STEEL-3 1 20 20
Special actions for EU-10 2003 FP6-2003-ACC-SSA-NMP 9 1 0.47 Coordination Action for National Contact Points
2003/04 FP6-2003-NMP-TI-3-ncp 1 Included in FP6-2003-NMP-TI-3-
Main
0.66
Special action for third countries
2006 FP6-2006-TT (contract amendments only)
19 3.5 3.5
Coordinated call with NSF 200 FP6-2004-NMP-NSF 5 6 5
Support conferences EuroNanoForum
2004, 2005, 2007
ADHOCSUBV 3 n/a 0.86
Nanotechnology R&D in the Nanotechnology R&D in the EU 6EU 6thth FP FP
2004~370 € million
2005~470 € million
NMP, 209.01
IST, 180.03
ERA-NET, 2.2
Science and Society, 1.09
NEST, 8.15
SMEs, 13.77
Infrastructure, 16.46
Marie Curie, 39.73
FP4(1994-98):30M€/year
FP5(1998-2002):45M€/year
NMP, 211.61IST, 99.57
Marie Curie, 50.73
NEST, 5.06
ERA-NET, 3.20SMEs, 0.91
2003 г. STREP
Success rate (above the threshold of 23points)
~ 21 % for Member states
~16% for accession and associated states.
Participation in proposals above threshold
16%2%
82%
AS + CC
Third Countries
Memner States
2003 г. STREP
Other StatesNumber of partners
Percentage
BG BULGARIA 22 0.47CY CYPRUS 11 0.24CZ CZECH REPUBLIC 97 2.09EE ESTONIA 9 0.19 HU HUNGARY 63 1.35LT LITHUANIA 28 0.60LV LATVIA 22 0.47 MT MALTA 0.00PL POLAND 212 4.56RO ROMANIA 92 1.98SI SLOVENIA 63 1.35 SK SLOVAK REPUBLIC 44 0.95TR TURKEY 63 1.35CH SWITZERLAND 103 2.21IL ISRAEL 72 1.55 IS ICELAND 5 0.11LI LICHTENSTEIN 2 0.04 NO NORWAY 43 0.92TOTAL Cand & Assoc 951 20.45
TOTAL all 4651
Percentage Participation of the Partners of Candidate, Associated and EFTA countries in all Proposals Received
0.47
0.24
2.09
0.19
1.35
0.600.47
0.00
4.56
1.98
1.35
0.95
1.35
2.21
1.55
0.11 0.04
0.92
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
BG CY CZ EE HU LT LV MT PL RO SI SK TR CH IL IS LI NO
02
1
2003 г. STREP
Other StatesNumber of partners
(All)
Number of partners
(Retained)
Success Rate
BG BULGARIA 22 1 4.5%CY CYPRUS 11 0.0%CZ CZECH REPUBLIC 97 16 16.5%EE ESTONIA 9 2 22.2% HU HUNGARY 63 11 17.5%LT LITHUANIA 28 2 7.1%LV LATVIA 22 5 22.7% MT MALTAPL POLAND 212 35 16.5%RO ROMANIA 92 6 6.5%SI SLOVENIA 63 10 15.9% SK SLOVAK REPUBLIC 44 6 13.6%TR TURKEY 63 8 12.7%CH SWITZERLAND 103 28 27.2%IL ISRAEL 72 12 16.7% IS ICELAND 5 0.0%LI LICHTENSTEIN 2 0.0% NO NORWAY 43 11 25.6%TOTAL 951 153 16.1%
Success Rates of the Partners of Candidate, Associated and EFTA countries in all Proposals Received
4.5%
0.0%
16.5%
22.2%
17.5%
7.1%
22.7%
16.5%
6.5%
15.9%
13.6%12.7%
27.2%
16.7%
0.0% 0.0%
25.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
BG CY CZ EE HU LT LV MT PL RO SI SK TR CH IL IS LI NO
2004 год. STREP
Процентно участие на партньори от асоциираните страни и страните-кандидатки
(Интегрирани проекти- IP за 2004 год.)
Искано финансиране: (IP)
Процентно участие в IP, преминали прага на оценките (2004 г.)
Всички проекти: 2004 % участие на партньори от асоциираните страни и
страните-кандидатки
Running FP6 projects Running FP6 projects implementing the research priority “Nanotechnologies and Nanosciences”implementing the research priority “Nanotechnologies and Nanosciences”
and directly followed by Unit G4and directly followed by Unit G4Alphabetic index by projectAlphabetic index by project
• Active Biomics• ADONIS • AMBIO• AMNA• ASPRINT• BIODIAGNOSTICS• Biomach• Biomagsens• Bioscope• BMR• CANAPE• CARE-MAN• CellForce• CellPROM• CiDNA• COMEPHS• CORNEA ENGINEERIN
G• DESYGN-IT• DYNASYNC• FORCETOOL• FRONTIERS
• GANANO• GENSENSOR-NANOPA
RTS• GSOMEN• Hy3M• IMPART• NABIS• NACBO• NAIMO• NANO2LIFE• NANO3D• NANOBEAMS• NANOCAPS• NanoChemSens• NANOCUES• NANOIMPRINT• NANODIALOGUE• NANOLOGUE• NanoMan• NanoMesh• NANOQUANTA• NANORAC• NANOROADMAP• NANO ROAD SME
• NANOS4• NANOSAFE2• NANOSPIN• NANOTEMPLATES
• NANOTOX• NaPa• NAS-SAP• NUCAN• PARNASS• PECTICOATPECTICOAT• PROFORMPROFORM• PSY-NANO-SIPSY-NANO-SI• RECEPTRONICSRECEPTRONICS• SA-NANOSA-NANO• SANDIESANDIE• SEMINANOSEMINANO• SingleMotor-FLINSingleMotor-FLIN• SNIP2CHIPSNIP2CHIP• SPANGSPANG• SPPSPP• TAMIRUTTAMIRUT• TASNANOTASNANO• ULTRA_1DULTRA_1D• X-TIPX-TIP
FP7 (2007-2013)http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home.html
• Последни поправки – гласуване в Европейския парламент
29.11.2006
• В Европейския съвет
5.12.2006
Budget FP7 (2007-2013) and
Euratom (2007-2011) (in EUR million, July 2006) • Cooperation 32365• Ideas (European Research Council) 7460• People (Marie Curie Actions) 4728• Capacities 4217• Non-nuclear actions of JRC 1751 Total EC < 50521Euroatom for nuclear research 2700
General reduction!
Видове проекти
• Small / medium
• Large ( > 4МЕ в NMP)
• CSA
• SME (participation at least 35%)
• Joint calls (ICT, ..)
Форми на финансиране
• Reimbursement of eligible costs
• Lump sum (CSA = CA +SSA) • Flat rate financing
One cost model (all direct and indirect costs can be charged; a flat rate for indirect cost)
Frontier research 100% reimbursement
10 themes1. Health
2. Food, Agriculture and Biotechnology
3. Information and Communication Technologies
4. Nanosciences, Nanotechnologies, Materials and new Production Technologies
5. Energy
6. Environment (including Climate Change)
7. Transport (including Aeronautics)
8. Socio-Economic Sciences and the Humanities
9. Security
10. Space
Cooperation – Collaborative researchCooperation – Collaborative research
Програми (финансиране за 7 г.)
(~ 50200 ME) ?
• NanoMatPro (TP4 Cooperation) 3500 ME
• Ideas – frontier research
European Research Council – до 5%
European Research Council
• “frontier research” - new scientific and technological results and probably unexpected results
• The European Research Council (ERC), composed of a Scientific Council , is a dedicated organisation to implement EU frontier research activities. Research areas covered will be independent of the thematic orientations of other parts of the Framework Programme, and will include engineering, social sciences and the humanities
• The Scientific Council is responsible for the governance of the ERC and consists of 22 representatives of the European scientific community at the highest level, nominated by the Commission following the final report of the independent ERC Identification Committee chaired by former European Commissioner Lord Patten of Barnes
http://erc.europa.eu/pdf/launch-strategy_en.pdf
Ongoing ERA-NETS which directly involve NMP
• ETRANET• MNTERA-NET• SUSPRISE• WOODWISDOM-NET• ACENET ERA-NET• ERABUILD• MATERA• MANUNET• NANOSCI• ERA-SPOT
Pooling of resources (national, private, European) to support the emergence of new facilities required by the scientific community within the next 10-20 years
European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI): http://www.cordis.lu/esfri/home.html
Integration through existing and future Networks of Excellence, e.g. NanoQuanta / ETSF, European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility.
Infrastructures Infrastructures actionsactionsFP7FP7
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home.html
Благодаря за вниманието
УСПЕХ!!
top related