7/30/2019 Amendment for Plc

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/amendment-for-plc 1/2

PROJECT: GODAVARI SUGAR MILLS LTD.

Ref. XL/FIL/989/698 5th January 2001

Fenner (India) Limited.,82, Peters road,Chennai – 600 014

Kind Attn : Mr. Subbaraj / Mr. Manikandan

DGM – Engg.Dear Sirs,

Sub : Detail Engineering for Bagasse Handling System for 24MW CPP – GodavariSugar Mills Ltd. – Control Desk

We take reference to your letter dated 30 th December2000 and we would like to furnish out replyas under:

On the issue of redundancy for CPU now asked for by BSES, we feel it is not proper or fair on our side to raise objection in view of the following reasons.

1. Right from the beginning Fenner is aware BSES are the EPC contractor for the job and you

have to get DESEIN approval, which definitely would have been their pre-condition of their contract to Fenner. They have so far asked you to proceed with ordering certainequipment in anticipation of approval. (No doubt it is delaying our side). But we can notfind fault with them because they do have the joint responsibility of execution of contractthrough Fenner in time). All the same Fenner can definitely raise objection or so voice their concern in any other matters. But here in this particular case, we cannot raise objectiondue to the reasons mentioned below.

2. BSES has already noted our claims for various extra prices and we have won already extrafor a few items to the tune of 2.25 lakhs approximately, other than redundant CPU. Theyhave also accepted to pay for the redundant CPU which is a welcome situation. At this juncture, we feel that we should not antagonise BSES for their reversal of their earlier comments (because it is going to benefit Fenner by way of extra price).

3. This point is all the more true because Fenner has still not ordered the equipment andmanufacturing has not been completed. Addition of redundant CPU is just a simpleaddition of an electronic card, for which Fenner cannot raise hue and cry, because in onesentence, you can ask the supplier to add this.

4. In view of the aforesaid, we feel you need not raise your objection to BSES on this accountbut all the same we will find out other points and give you another letter where in we canelaborate all the other points which are affecting our progress. Trust this would meet your requirements.

In this regard as desired by you we attach herewith one page of amendment which shall beforwarded to PLC (CD) bidders and ask them to take care of same in their final bid. Thisamendment is to be sent to all the bidders and considered by you while you place the order for 

CD.

Thanking you and assuring you of our best services at all times,

Very truly yours,for EXCEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.,

S RENGARAJAN, Director Encl. As above

7/30/2019 Amendment for Plc

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/amendment-for-plc 2/2

PROJECT: GODAVARI SUGAR MILLS LTD.

AMENDMENT TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR CD - (PLC BASED)

1.0 SECTION – 11.1 Page no.7 - Bill of Materials Item no.4.6 shall be read as follows: instead of what isspecified in the original specification.Belt weigh scale – Remote indicator (flow rate indicator cum totaliser). Cut out size shall be307 mm (horizontal dimension) x 102 mm (vertical dimension). This equipment will besupplied by Fenner - to be mounted & wired by CD supplier.Dimensional sketch of the remote indicator is enclosed for your reference.

1.2 Item 4.7 is deleted and hence item 4.8 to 4.11 shall be read as 4.7 to 4.10. In the new item4.10 (old 4.11) the number of digital input is revised as 224 instead of 208 indicated earlier.No other change in any of the other inputs or outputs indicated earlier.

2.0 SECTION – 2 (Clause 4.1 & 8.0)2.1 Our clients have now asked us to provide redundant CPU for the PLC system; hence

please include redundant CPU.In order that we are able to claim extra price for provision of redundant CPU, please giveyour base offer with non-redundant CPU as per specification and additional price for provision of redundant CPU now specified and included in the scope under this Amendment. At this instant please note in clause 7.0 (page 15) we have already specified redundantpower supply; hence the same shall be ensured.

3.0 SECTION – 33.1 In Item 1.0 addition (e) a new item as “extra price for provision of redundant CPU.”

4.0 SECTION – 44.1 Tender Drawings:

MCC room lay out – please note this may undergo changes as clients are askingfor control room in First Floor. As such in order to finalise the lay out, bidders arerequested to furnish their dimensional details for the following in their offer.a) Processor Cabinet.b) CD.c) UPS Panel.

4.2 Control System Architecture Drawing sheet 1 of 3 :- As already stated CPU now required shall be redundant type (Redundant power supply already specified). As such please indicate extra price for provision for redundant CPU.

Sheet No.4:- System configuration table serial no.3: Digital inputs (in multiple of 16 channel units) is revised to 224 instead of 208.

 All other items mentioned in the original technical specification remain unchanged.