LAKE010

REPORT ON

COMBINED HELICOPTER-BORNE

MAGNETIC AND VLF SURVEY

DOUGIE LAKE AEM SURVEY

PICKLE LAKE AREA, ONTARIO

RECEIVED

MAY Z i) 1937

MINING UNOS SECTION

for

DURATION MINES LTD.

byAERODAT LIMITED

September, 1986

TABLE lOF CONTENTSo oQ 1. INTRODUCTION

2. SURVEY AREA LOCATION

3. AIRCRAFT AND EQUIPMENT

3.1 Aircraft

3.2 Equipment

3.2.1 Electromagnetic System

3.2.2 VLF-EM System

3.2.3 Magnetometer

3.2.4 Magnetic Base Station

3.2.5 Radar Altimeter

3.2.6 Tracking Camera

3.2.7 Analog Recorder

3.2.8 Digital Recorder

3.2.9 Radar Positioning System

4. DATA PRESENTATION

4.0 3ase .Map

s.l Total Field Magnetic Contours

4.2 VLF-EM Total Field Contours

5. INTERPRETATION S RECOMMENDATIONS

Page No.1-1

2-1

3-1

3-1

3-1

3-1

3-2

3-2

3-2

3-3

3-3

3-4

3-4

4-1

4-1

4-1

5-1

Maps

LIST OF MAPS

(Scale-. 1:5,000)

4. Total Field Magnetic Contours.

6. VLF-2M Total Field Contours.

iti:1. INTRODUCTION

This report describes an airborne geophysical survey carried out

on behalf of Duration Mines Ltd. by Aerodat Limited. Equipment

operated included a three-frequency electromagnetic system, a

high sensitivity cesium vapour magnetometer, a VLF-EM system,

a tracking camera, an altimeter and a radar positioning system.

Electromagnetic, magnetic and altimeter data were recorded both

in digital and analog form. Positioning data were stored in

digital form and on film as well as being recorded manually by

the operator in flight.

The survey area, comprising a block of ground in the Kenora

Mining District of northwestern Ontario, situated about 90 kilo

metres west of Pickle Lake, was flown on June 17, 1986. Three

flights were required to complete the survey with flight lines

oriented at an Azimuth of 032 degrees and flown at a nominal

spacing of 50 metres. Coverage and data quality were considered

to be well within the specificiations described in the contract.

The purpose of the survey was to record airborne geophysical

data over and around ground that is of interest to Duration

Mines Ltd.

l

l

l

l

l

il l l l

i

l

A total of 412 kilometres of the recorded data were compiled in

map form and are presented as part of this report according to

specifications outlined by Duration Mines Ltd.

l l l l

2 - l

2. SURVEY AREA LOCATION

The survey area is depicted on the index map shown below. It is

centred at Latitude 51 degrees 32 minutes north, Longitude 91

degrees 27 minutes west, approximately 90 kilometres due west of

the town of Pickle Lake in northwestern Ontario (NTS Reference

Map No. 52 0/11). The area is accessed from Pickle Lake by

float plane.

jS^-^''^si:- ::^5hIl, f ,,w tU^Mtiltl fotMtflHJtH ttiXll\*fJif'.. .. . yw"^1_j--J***-t^

l

N \ CLAIMS CO'.-.. V MO^LEO^f y

'•-\^/- r

J^

jiii^J-J-,,• SUM**, - i *^ i V l *t ^3 ' i**jj.i!

|^Oa**'l6?i43* 6?I4S7

1(0" "~^f;*tr {6?C4*

3j^:H''-;--^;;^^^^*^ le-N-^^X X^^...^•i^M^^^^V-^r'ijLr*—r--—•7.-—,- *"-"~"" *"~~*l~r~'Ui3r^' : C ~—S3 ^^ ' i) r"-"~i^'"T":-f'';"'v 1-^ I'jfffi -' -' '*' •••'•v-'^^irCa/ifhLj••T(w.'---^-\ x'^j^jj S' X l '•"•~^nta\T^A - -i . i 1 -:; ^"*V^r^ l . '"! fvtf^^ ~^fjtt^,ybjo('

WaV"" AJf^^i^ii.* W- ^-^*!^ —^ ,B |rr J. f*f——- -t "* ** ^*"*S "T-*^ ^. . li . A*k-HB (H,

X"

l etna "l??//?? TO

6^.'//v*/ l ,tt?M

'Sf??'? \

3 - l

3 - AIRCRAFT AND EQUIPMENT

3.1 Aircraft

The helicopter used for the survey was an Aerospatiale

A-Star 3BOB owned and operated by Lakeland Helicopters

Limited (C-GATX). Installation of the geophysical and ancil

lary equipment was carried out by Aerodat. The survey air

craft was flown at a mean terrain clearance of 60 metres.

3.2 Equipment

3.2.1 Electromagnetic System

The electromagnetic system was an Aerodat 3-frequency

system. Two vertical coaxial coil pairs were operated

at 935 and 4600 Hz and a horizontal coplanar coil

pair at 4175 Hz. The transmitter-receiver separation

was 7 metres. Inphase and quadrature signals were

measured simultaneously for the 3 frequencies with a

time constant of 0.1 seconds. The electromagnetic

bird was towed 30 metres below the helicopter.

3.2.2 VLF-EM System

The VLF-EM system was a Herz Totem 1A. i'his instru

ment measures the total field and quadrature compo

nents of the selected frequencies. The sensor was

li i i ii

i i ii(i

j;,.

lS:

ri i

towed in a bird 12 metres below the helicopter. The

transmitting stations used was NAA (Cutler, Maine,

24.8 kHz).

3.2.3 Magnetometer

The magnetometer was a Scintrex Cesium optically

pumped high sensitivity type. The sensitivity of the

instrument was 0.02 nT at a 0.1 second sampling rate.

The sensor was towed in a bird 18 metres below the

helicopter.

3.2.4 Magnetic Base Station

An IFG proton precession magnetometer was operated

at the base of operations to record diurnal varia

tions of the earth's magnetic field.

The clock of the base station was synchronized with

that of the airborne system to facilitate later

correlation.

3.2.5 Radar Altimeter

A Hoffman HRVlOO radar altimeter was used to record

terrain clearance. The output from the instrument is

a linear function of altitude for maximum accuracy.

l•j

^r^-'-^i^f 'i#' H':" ^ •.,;.'--.' ''.;.-- , Y ," •'•. ''\ ' ' ' - - ' ", -'. t'- - ' ' , : ,- -'..' ; ;,.'-;- ; . i '- -'.'V "- 1,: . ;", ' *' ' i .- •••,' ^" -, y ' .."few:.^te^-"-- -Y' ;-:-iPfeN;;: -: v

3.2.6m

f fllllllllllllll

3.2.7

Tracking Camera

A Geocam tracking camera was used to record flight

path on 35mm film. The camera was operated in strip

mode and the fiducial numbers for cross-reference to

the analog and digital data were imprinted on the

margin of the film.

Analog Recorder

An RMS dot-matrix recorder was used to display the

data during the survey. In addition to manual and

time fiducials, the following data was recorded:

Channel

ALT

CXI1

CXQ1

CXI2

CXQ2

CPU

CPQ1

VLT

VLQ

MAGC

MAG F

Input

Altimeter (500 ft. at top

of chart).

Low Frequency Inphase

Low Frequency Quadrature

High Frequency Inphase

High Frequency Quadrature

Mid Frequency Inphase

Mid Frequency Quadrature

VLF-EM Total Field

VLF-EM Quadrature

Magnetometer - Coarse

Magnetometer - Fine

Scale

10 f t./mm

2 ppm/mm

2 ppm/mm

2 ppm/mm

2 ppm/mm

4 ppm/mm

4 ppm/mm

2.5%/mm

2.5%/mm

20 gamma/mm

2 gamma/mm

P^lf^^S^^gf^f^! - ;; . ^^^j^^^y{::^

3.2.8 Digital. Recorder

A Perle DAC/NAV data system recorded the survey on

magnetic tape. Information recorded was as follows:

Equipment Ii.tarval

EN 0.1 seconds

VLF-EM Tocem lA 0.5 seconds

Magnetometer 0.1 seconds

Altimeter 0.5 seconds

MRS III 0.5 seconds

3.2.9 Radar Positioning System

A motorola Mini-Ranger (MRS III) radar navigation

system was utilized for both navigation and track

recovery. Transponders located at fixed locations

were interrogated several times per second and the

ranges from these points to the helicopter measured

to an accuracy of about 10 metres. A navigational

computer triangulates the position of the helicopter

and provides the pilot with navigational information.

The range/range data were recorded on magnetic tape

for subsequent flight path determination.

ll

4-1

4. DATA PRESENTATION

4.0 Base Map

A photomosaic base at a scale of 1:5,000 was prepared by

enlargement of aerial photographs of the survey area.

i

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

li':

l

l

l

l

The flight path was derived from the Mini -Ranger radar

positioning system. The distance from the helicopter to two

established reference locations was measured several times

per second, and the position of the helicopter calculated by

triangulation. It is estimated that the flight path is

generally accurate to about 10 metres with respect to the

topographic detail of the base map. The flight path is

presented with fiducials for cross-reference to both the

analog and digital data.

4. l Total Field Magnetic Contours

The aeromagnetic data were corrected for diurnal variations

by subtraction of the digitally recorded base station mag

netic profile.

The corrected profile data were interpolated onto a regular

grid at a 10m true scale interval using a cubic spline

technique. The grid provided the basis for threading the

presented contours at a 2 nT interval.

The aeromagnetic data were presented on a greyflex copy of

the photo base map with the flight path information.

*v,-1J.*. ..\

4 -2

" &VW '' .•i^.--J^;-..-:"'

l;:i• :

•l '

ll ll

l l l lllfi

4.2 VLF Total Field Electromagnetic Contours

The VLF-EM signal from NAA (Cutler, Maine, 24.8 kHz) was

gridded at a 10 metre interval and presented on a gr.eyflex

copy of the pnoto base map along with the flight line

information.

B l

.1 i

5 - l

5. INTERPRETATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

'K Geology

i i

Geologic information was taken from the 1:253,440 scale O.D.M.

Geological Compilation Series Map #2218 (Cat Lake - Pickle Lake

Sheet) published in 1975 and based on geologic compilations by

l R.P. Sage, F.W. Breaks and W. Troup.

•m The map shows the survey area to be mostly underlain by mafic to

B intermediate metavolcanics, the block covering a narrow offshoot

of metavolcanics from a fairly large greenstone mass. Iron for-

I ' mation, gold and sulphide mineralization were indicated on the

geologic map with a gold showing off the west end of the lake to' l " the southeast of Semia Lake.

lTypec of toilets sought have not been identified although it is

I,

assumed that the primary interest is in gold mineralization that

occurs throughout the general area.

I

Magnetics"~

f The magnetic data from the high sensitivity magnetometer pro-

— vide virtually a continuous magnetic reading when recording at

" one-tenth second intervals. The system is also practically noise

-l tree.

The sensitivity of 0.1 nT allows for the mapping of very small

inflections in the magnetic field resulting in a contour map

that is. comparable in quality tp good ground data. Both the fine

and coarse magnetic traces were recorded on the analog charts.

The regional magnetic map (ODM/GSC Map #7010G, Lake St.

Joseph) shows that the Dougie Lake survey covers a fairly promi

nent magnetic trend that is limited to the extent of the survey

block. Strong, east-westerly magnetic zones occur just a few

kilometres to the north. Low grade sedimentary iron formation

bands are the probable source of the magnetic trends. No ap

parent regional structural trends cut through or otherwise have

any bearing on either survey block.

The Dougie Lake magnetic map is characterized by two moderately

strong (i.e., 500 to 700 nT above background) magnetic bands

along the centre of this narrow northwesterly trending block.

Over the eastern half of the survey, the two bands are roughly

parallel to one another, but have been distorted by slight fold

ing and faulting over the western portion.

Plug-like magnetic highs, centred on Lines 160 and 1320 and of

roughly the same amplitude (i.e., 7000 and 5000 nT above

background), occupy the space between the two long trends. Both

of these highs appear to be due to two or more lenticular bands

oriented east-northeasterly.

The apparent 'pinching' of the two long trends toward the

western end of the block may be related to the unconformity

between the metavolcanics and granite. In any event, a third

magnetic zone is present, starting at the western boundary and

swinging east-northeasterly off the north edge of the survey at

about Line 1650.

Two principal diabase/structural trends are evident over the

length of the survey. A series of weak northeasterly to east-

northeasterly diabase trends have been identified along with a

few minor structures (e.g., toward the northwest corner and the

north end of Line 510). This trend is paralleled by the major

axes of the two strong, lenticular magnetic highs. The major -

probably younger - fault structures, along with three diabase

trends, are oriented in roughly a north-south direction. A sub

stantial offset in the long magnetic zones is interpreted just

west of the central magnetic high and other lesser offsets

across these trends appear elsewhere in the survey.

A third, northwesterly structural trend appears to be present

between Lines 250 to 510 near the north boundary of the survey

block.

.

i;*The two, long, sub-parallel magnetic zones are interpreted as

B low grade iron formation bands that extend beyond the western

B and eastern limits of the survey. The strong, lenticular mag

netic highs central to these zones are of the magnitude of high

l grade iron formation but are limited in strike length. They may

be interpreted as ultramafic intrusive plugs, however, the

B eastern high does not fit this interpretation as neatly as does

U the central high. The eastern anomaly appears to extend to the

—

northeast (along a structural break ?) with a pronounced mag-

netic gradient to the south. A somewhat similar gradient is

evident along the north central boundary.

l The magnetic patterns north of the long zones and east of Line

670 are anomalously complex but the sampling is somewhat

I*

limited for purposes of interpretation.

VLF-EH Total Field

l; The VLF map of the Dougie Lake survey shows excellent cor-

' ™ relation with the magnetics both from the standpoint of magnetic

I trends and structure. Certainly the east-northeast structural . r trends are far more prominent on the VLF than on the magnetics

I'

(in particular see east end of block), but the 'major' north -

•g south structural offset (from north end of Line 1650) is not; ll supported.

i i

The southernmost line of VLF highs from Lines 950 to 2170 may

mark the actual granite/metavolcanic contact; additional litho

logic boundaries appear along the north edge of the survey.

Several of these VLF trends, interpreted as fault/contact

phenomena, fall along or over lakes or drainage patterns. They

cannot be dismissed as surficial responses as the drainage

courses themselves are a reflection of bedrock structure or

lithology.

The lack of conductive overburden in this area and the favour

able orientation of the stratigraphic and structural trends are

undoubtedly the primary reasons for the excellent delineation of

lithology and structure by the airborne VLF method. The various

VLF trends have been marked and identified on the Interpre

tation Map.

^.^t^w^•••'•'•'^•••^:?^

5-6

DISCUSSION

The Magnetic and VLF surveys are a good source of airborne information to assist the stratigraphic and structural interpretation of this area.

The Total Field Magnetic maps show fairly well the strati

graphy of the entire property, although the picture at the eastern end

of the survey is not entirely resolved and there still remains the

possibility that the main trends extend off the, end of the survey

block; however, the interpretation of a folded structure is preferred.

A number of criteria favourable to gold mineralization are

considered to have been satisfied within this survey area based on the

results of this survey and the available geology. These are moderate

to weak VLF conductors along or parallel to bands of iron formation

together with some apparent faulting and possible folding in a meta- volcanic host rock.

5-7

RECOMMENDATIONS

l

l

l

l

l

l

ify *'r

l

l*

1

Magnetic and VLF conductors along the southwest shore of

Dougie Lake (going through the small islands at the west end of the

lake) as well as the area south of the southwest lobe of Mcvicar Lake

(Just north of a small east-northeast trending lake) are recommended

as majsive sulphide targets associated with iron formation (ie.

graphite-pyrite-pyrrhotitc). Weaker, possibly gold bearing VLF

targets are associated with iron formation and structure in the

central and southeast part along the south shore of Dougie Lake, the

area to the north of Semia Lake, and the area between Semia Lake and

the southwest lobe of Mcvicar Lake.

All conductive areas, especially the very narrow and weak

responses should be re-evaluated after the airborne data has b'.:en

compiled on a geologic base with all available geologic information,

preferably at a scale of 1:5000 for better correlation of geologic and

geophysical data.

Respectfully Submitted,

AERODAT LIMITED

September 1986.

George Podolsk/y

Geophysical Consultant

i

'"***'"' dta " i rr-if ion and flight path recovery method:^i'\.,™t——————:—————————————r————— ———————^;; .Tlown @ 032V Hoffman HRA-100 Radar analog recorder.^f RMS *iot matrix recorder displayed data during survey.!?'; Motorola Mini-Range (MRSIII) radar system was used for navigationf" and track recovery.

Altimeter-record terrain clearance; GeoCan Tracking; camerarecorded flight path.

•*e.*.''

f

lirjii ii i i i i ii ii i

CLAIMS FOR AIRBORME CREDIT K)R LOCATOR EXPLORATION LTD.

MINING CLAIM

Prefix

KRLII

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

It

II

II

II

It

II

It

tt

II

II

II

II

II

Number

893205893206893207893208893209893210893211893212893213893214893215893216893217893218893219893220893221893245893246893255893256893257893258893259893260893261893262893263893264

Prefix

KRL ittt

M

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

tt

II

II

II

Number

893285893286893287893288893289893290893291893292893293893294893295893296893297903546903547903548903549903550903551903552903553903554903555903556903557903558

fi .-J*'" i

DURATION MINES LTD. - DOUGIE LAKE CLAIMS FOR AIRBORNE CREDIT

MINING CLAIM

Prefix Number

KRL 893247

893248

893249 " 893750

893253

893298

893299

893300

893301

893302

893303893304

893305893306

893307

897668

897669

897653

897654

ill:;,t ; '

LL

|LLiL

1 L.

Li

L

w*

*—

:lk

t i

:'li ; K-'

O'"!... ;

f

I

•IF '

'1 1~

j^TN Ministry of Geophysical-Geologlcal-Geochemica! C, 1 VY 1 Northern Development Technical Data Statement

^Vj^X and Mines Ontario File

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT 1 FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC. j

Type of Survey(s Airborne Magnetic ( VLFTownship or Area McVicar Lake AreaClaim Holder(s) Locator Explorations Ltd.

Duration Mines Ltd.Survey Company Aerodat

Author of Rrport GeorRe PodolskyArlrfrrw of Author 172 Dunwoody Dr., Oakville. Ontario.Cover ing Dates of Survey June 17. .1986...

" ' {[incoming to office)

Total Mil*-.; of Line Cut

SPECIAL PROVISIONS DAYS CREDITS REQUESTED Geophysical

-Electromagnetic, , ,...-,ENTER 40 days (includesline cutting) for first Magnetometer ———————— survey -Radiomrtrk.. ..,.-,,,, r

FNTKH ?() days for rach -Othfradditional survey using r.i-nlngiralsame grid. "

f.iporhemiral. ..

AIRBORNE CREDIIS (Special provuion crediu do not apply lo airborne lurveyi)

Macnc lompfr..:'.?. .. .. Elrriromapnetii- f*0 . JtarKornctrir ,(enter dayi per clajjjrf jS jSJ

HATE: ^^)"- 2 2 sir,\'ATiml^^v^r'5^t''7S* Auplor of Report or Artfol

r

Res. Geol. Qualifications ' ^ ,^ . .1 . . . . . .

Previous SurveysFile No. Type Date Claim Holder

i

^^..^^^.^r.^^^,^.

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED Lut numerically

(prefix) (number)

^ jMM^ Uat

TOTAL CI AIM'S

i

t

ii

j

['

~,

il

|1

1iii iia

i f

837 18 V1?)

SELF POTENTIAL Instrument.———— Range.Survey Method.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC Instrument___Values measured.Energy windows (levels). Height of instrument —— Size of detector____ Overburden _______

.Background Count.

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMJC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey.—--———---—---—-——-———.——- Instrument —————————————————————————Accuracy—————————~.—---—-——-———-————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYSType of survcy(s) Magnetics; VI*r ———————————————————————-———Instrument(s) High Sensitivity Cesium Vapour Magnetometer: VLF - Herz Totem 1A

Accuracy LlC metre.srQ-uad(ipecify for each type of lurvey)

JLQcatJLQni.aagnetQmeter - Q. 02 nl. VLF -. .11

Aircraft used

Sensor

(ipccify foi each type of turvey) A-Star 3SQR Helicopter —

Magnetiff Senpor 42 V^F 42

Navigation and flight path recovery mpthnrl See Attached Sheet

Aircraft 60 metres

Miles flown over total area. 12 Km

.Line Sparing 50 m

.Over claims only_ Jfm

l i'T

-rv;.*?

f

J

STO

UGHT

ON

W3i

S !l.J

.!.m

^|

t.ipl

"~??

g *i

!f^N

fi ̂

.--O

s-^i

tfe-^

iift

r̂il^

Vl

"?rv

v **

ra-^

frl2

M^i

Ji *

121 *

y i

S i

2 "'•"

s fi

xfrifc

fi. a *

^

r i ' - *

*r^

M/!

t

i^

?^' '

"^N

V.

5 C

JfC

Kt^

X^iiM

ftlS^•

few

'i^K

*}it

*X

11

T

k V

*L

*O

a

^

.

^^

*

U ..5

5KIS

^-^•

^Pk

i-, T:

"r fefe

r14., j .-

.it -c

.*"

*.

v l

VN

^ t/

3

i ^!

\tf

l**'ip

"t'sT

ra3^

l v

Fc

\R1

MV

i* h

i*-*

S ?I

S .'6

1 S.

p B

V I

N|'t.

i!4'!y

v.'v *

8 a

i! iV

il i

. )

i .-

iff ''

J*' •

*-'- c

.'vi

l -

..' *^

^'^

\M

' '-'

. -- ^l

'; - '

*. ~

o o

A J

T o —

. iC

^: w

-^v^

T^^M

(ws'M

Ww.

ww^ii

iS'W

fflfti

ww

(O

Xs—-

/̂7'v"'

' '

^-

! ''V

^'lm

!?'

^s

y\

)\

r~

S "

U

"\4

wv,

-vi'

v\

/l\

7

\ ~i\ \

.x'

-Xs

f-

-l

i s-^s

il*

*'' :

"\f,

i-^tS

Ij-:^

i ^

;R'i

S-lM

, lf

"i

sX

^N

/'^

\

'^

^ yf

Pm7

w** \

i r^

- s I'll

l5 S

ym,

. . .

1.1

..

- J^c

/..*

*w

*-

- —

M*^

M

klT

K^

S

J^r^

fi

flB

&fw

1

.i--.

^^

ffet

u tt

iKau

tout

tnt

enW

IKl*

'^K

.?W

SEM

SI I*J

\ rf 't

M"^

ir::H-\

\ i

}.K

...il

.'.l.i

'..1

1A;

K^ s

i^ii ^r

il•);?

. j-,

, .;.

;:lLi

.^a^'

'

P t

^"'1

^ p'V

5*

/*

-Cv '

••:'(rt

WS

^ ;\

5*1 ^s

iv ^i

? ht

^Ifl

,; s;

f: i

;; t

'-A ;i

-^p

^ i

v^-K

r"^

-v^!

'7^"

rife

MCVIC

AR

33(V)

5 c^

*R

I x

7S

*

"ir\

^2!

, -

^ 2

C

.*O

3"-

' "

x

i-•i

i Pi

"Tl

o

^

u

VI

f~*

——

—

l W

0

/-\

Hw

O

wM

^* 9} m

** O) H O C x-^

i :

!8i.

o'

-?

2

* ^

^

,m*

-^8

zl

? g n1

i5

I

*^

v;l3

|i^;;

. ,^-

^

--^'^-'^-'^^'^s"* "—"" ' -

McViCAR

Iftl'Ii'f/LrlL"_ — LL'II.'JLr^'tiLji1:^.*'' !'*'~ ! Si.':)i : t.*,/- 'a 9 .t' -. !

f

t i \f.^'L-J.i.-'^^f^irii.-'^'Lli-"1 ' 'c-^^l.-v,-,."i-.^VV:^o----i -- V-'- "i i *-r - .-*- '-*t ! .'~~;47-^:i-^-—l —-Lir'"--A"i . !" i- "*"^* " \

H i!xx i-s- -r ri

U^JJT ^^fi'^'^l/dfe;- ^r^^l^-^ ! t -,-—-;.-TS..- S * i^-^ll-iL'-^-^'J^-- 1—^^ 3̂ ^--':--- M ^ ^- ;-- -'^——r-r-^T^r^-:—-^- ^-—^^- : - ,f^ -*tV -**:^ J"1 "4 -

x )•\'~ j" ;'*- .:*"- ;" A p- p";^ j-"- l"- ;-~ -"Yrr-;--;..^ .-'^ :T . s j l ^ j j j ' t l;.f litlf^±.Ji^' ? "'±1-JL'!!±-'-*-' f-"-*!*' /---"" i ^-"-••'-' i^-tffc I't^^^i^lLLi'ii/r-LArif:!.'^—~—•'ti'-~'~~3 ~i;~r:'- 7^—*"—""^ 1—'^—'—"—?—*—i*'-i-^L:-irjL.J±;f| l.-v ;.*- ,-'^- --^ ~; rJiJ7~^.:r~7^.C',~" !^~"-'-;^ ;-'- i.-/ '-^ ^rr" ! " ;" '^' ' i**- i*"- \**. \*** j.*. ; q ' ' *,., }- .. ' ^~-~-' i— i l \' ,/' : f - ; i i J ! i ^—^. 'J 1 ' —- ' ! H;M^G "^-— ' -' -, 1 ; ! ^'V^iCN u*"|iv-"^ v-^^—^—-S~^~^—J-n. ? -v3-r - ..—- g^.j-. -^ .-^ r-^^v f~,.*z : *j,^3- f -*W tl ?-..iii*.;-i \^^V- 5v.^- r ---?.- j^. .*.~ '•/.'. r.'^ 1 i... ̂ - -^ ;̂ :^, ,0-jgr7.-y .rv.), -.-y. . - J

, - v ^---ATR:C:- J | J M:N:.\!G ^T. -- 1 "-r—J^ IJ-"^VM /—i; lV .c -.4.. ' ; --f-——J-J" "7^^1.7"^ ^V, l ' . J/5.V.-7- l C__^ t -__ .——' -i - ; \S*t*ST\ 1^/05 V|

^Jw. I i r' . J --- l f at f 7' a *i - ^-. "^ ,*.. .r ^. t- J' *j*/ *r . - l - - - - . —- ~\ l r^^^^ I -. '. l

u k -'o' Report of Work Northern Dovtlopmtnland Mines {Geophynca!, Geological,

Geochemical and Expenditures! O

Mininf] Act

i ^'

Typ* of SiirvcyUl

Instructions: - Plaint type or print.- If numb*' of mining claims ii*vrv'.pil

eKCfftJ Wfif.f on tint form, olinrh .1 ImQ \ Nott: - Only r.'ayi credits c,ilr.(il.il'''l m UK

"t'xpcnij;!iiroi" lecnon rrviy lio mined in (he "E*P*nd. O.tys Cr." rolunin.

— Do not us* shaded arms below

Airborne Ceophygics ; To c. a I Field Magnetics, VLF-EM1 1* l m MolcTiVlfi ~ —— --

Locator Expl orat ions LtdA _ _ _" ~ ~ "" " ~

oivnihip O' ArlM

Mcvicar Lake .

T-/* 750

704-80 Richmond St. W., Toronto, Ontario. M5H 2C7" " "" " " "bm* "

Aerodat Ltd. . . . . . . . . .. ..Ntm* *nd Addreii o^ Author (of Oeo-Tecnmoi icpon)

George Pqdolski 172 Dunwoody Dr. . Oakville. Ontario.

MO.

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Is 15

Sptcifl Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. IThis includes line cuMing)

For each additional survey: using the same g-:d:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man D*yl

Complete reverse side and enter tota'(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not .ipply to Airborne Surveys

GiophyS'cal

M rr t

- Othei

Geological

Geophysical

. Magnetometer

- Othei

Geological

C .och,rn. t ai

eite ,VLFjn(!it

agnetometo-

Days p*'Claim

h

— - — —

Days per Claim

" "

Days pei Claim

40

JD.-

Expenditures (excludes power suippinglTypo of Work Pe'fO'mufl

P*, f ("madon C""nl "

Calculation ol Enpenditur* Days Credits Tom

Total Expenditures O.ivs Cre'Ms

Mining Claim "PreflK

KRL•"•",. ; V;'"' '.'' '* V r* '

.y/*.. Vy;.

~^:;''']

^•iif• '- V// i

i'' v*^-'*VV*i

^M'tm•4,.}(VA-'',if.j'i'"-'^'^•*'r-vv.''.,'V

" !\" ,' "' .

1 ' ' ' .' '

PAtR ^A.M.

JWlS

r

Number

See

"Attached—— - - --- ---

List.. —— . .- , — — .,H

,.t GE4V-I

INQ-tAHDS-S

—— ---- - - •---

/5 L I P f* Q i

. ftt-y-sltf.,.RJOIA-- MINING•.JB-E-S-'WJ'JN-4 tfi87

lp|IJil2|I|?i8

---i- -

Days C'.

;-

———— .

— ———

,P

ACTION

- — ~—

- - — -t0,'-"~ *

yH^M~'

u|o'0.j

Minmy C'*"1"1Pffftx f Number

KRI,

1 ' *, * *- * **

- , .

^yV

; * * '.

i * ' .'•' : V, ;

'

.

\"""-" " '

"- ' •--•--•-

....r. ".'"..

. .

j

Dfly* C*

i

t O*)ys C'CtJ'is may **c appo'tionco .11 Choice. Enter numtof o* aay* crcrttt* r-*1 ' r in colitrrtiis tit ''Qht,

7

For OHice Use Only l /ve 7 oi.ii O.ivs Ci iO.iit

*O.i t P A

Ccitification Vefifyi-'g Report of" i

l hereby certily that l have a f)cisoni)l -inn imnrvm- knr.wli'doc ol t hi- f.irf, srt (or t h m t lie or wiincssCiJ S;inte (lunnrj flnri/or ut ti:i its c oni|ili:iion .irul im: ,irxu.' xrd irpni t is t f uf

o l Wo/fc .i

NiinWiifKI PO4l.il Adfliois of f'eiion CcMilv.:';)

Bradley Leonard 704-FO Richmond St. W., Toronto. Ontario. M5H 2C7

m CLAIMS FOR AIRBORNE CREDIT FOP LOCATOR EXPLORATION LTD.

MINING CLAIM

Prefix

KRL n

tt tt n nII

II

fi

II

II

II

II

11

II

II

11

II

II

II

tt

II

II

II

II

II

II

Number

893205893206893207893208893209893210893211893212893213893214893215893216893217893218893219893220893221893245893246893255893256893257893258893259893260893261893262893263893264

Prefix

KRL nn fi n n fi n tt

tt n it H H

it M

H it H

Number

893285893286893287893288893289893290893291893292893293893294893295893296893297903546903547903548903549903550903551903552903553903554903555903556903557903558

'PATRICIA WWGoiv. 1(7ft ft i'': i'- 'i v;; l J fnl 'lil) li o U J u ib nil 5

A.M.

,,. Ministry ofNorthern Development end Mines

Ontario ^ ~t,*kr;~^

, M x w n

Report Of Work

(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Mining Act

1yp* or print.— H numlief of mining claims travi.'twi

exceed; space on this form, nttach n iif.i Note: - Only days credits calculate*.' "i Hio

"Expenditi..cs" section may l)t CMICKM! in the "txpcnd. Day Cr." columns

- Do not use shaded areas below.Typt Ol Surveyd)

Airborne Geophysics; Total Field Magnetics, VLF-EMClaim Holder (s)

Duration Mines Ltd.Address

township or Area

Mcvicar Laker's Licence l

T-1608

704 - 80 Richmond St. W., Toronto, Ontario. M5H 2C7Survey Company

Aerodat Ltd.Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Tochmcol report!

Georee Podplski 172 Dunwoody Dr., Oakville, Ontario.

o* Su'vcy U'orn (* tol Total

)a v i MO i Y.. 350 Km flown

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right___ Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provision!

For (irtt survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid.

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man D,iyt

Complete reverse side and enter lotaKs) here

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Days oer Claim

L....

Geophyncai

- Electronid^netic |

- Magnctor^eter

Geological

Oeoitt

Note: Snvcini provisions credits t)o not applyto Airborne Surveys j Magr.tiomemr

Da y* per

Expenditures (excludes power stripping''vre of wo'k Performed

Calculation ol Ear-encMure Days Credit

Total ExpendituresTotal

Ddys Credits

tnttr uctionsToial Cay* Credits may bo apportion**^ jt :no choice. EntC' nuftiijc' ol o.iys crcfiits po' rijirii in column) Jil nQ^ti.

Minjng ClaimPrefix Nwmher

. . ,. j- — -- -——

'•- ; .. .Attachec' -. -J "••: .1 List.''• ! " ; i

^; ' . — . . ____ f " ' i

•-vi . -.: •'^.••;'-7

;'; :;:;|R-I;-C^••,'.;j .IIJ'N T

•.fJIKIING-i-ANOS

- - i- PATRICIA^ f/Hv.xcf® i B fe i; v/ 1

A.M.7l9lO|lO|lIi32f1'f2f3j

i

'CxpondDays Ci.

i ——— .

————

r-C-l/.

9o^

-SE0T1I

*.- 1 *

---i P.M. ;

in i .A * pi J

)N

(Prefix

JCRL^.

-,., v .

'Vi'''

. ; ; t ^ -.

-

fining Claimi Number

i--™——

ji

r-™-—---- ---

ExpP",!D,iy! C'

. ...

i

!

i

i

i

Total r.,,ml)tf' o' m ClAinn COvcrori t)y'CfJO' t C* iVO'fc.

For Office Use OnlyI oi:il D.IV! Cr ;Ojtc

nnr

JCertification Venfymg Rcpoit of Work

l hereby ceilily that l have a personjl ano intimate knowiodrji1 o( the l.icti w t torth m t hi- Report o' Wi Oi witnessed same during and/or after its completion am) llir anni'm-il ii-pnri is tmo

.vinom'U ncicio.

*nw jnrt Potial Adrticsi ot Penon Certifying•~1

Bradley Leonard 704 - 80 Richmond St. W., Toronto .Ontario. HSU 2C7

---mDURATION MINES LTD. - DOUGIE LAKE CLAIMS FOR AIRBORNE CREDIT

MINING CLAIM

Prefix

KRLNumber

893247

893248

893249

893250

893251

893253

893298

893299

893300

893301

893302

893303

893304

893305

893306

893307

897668

897669

897653

897654

PATR'C-iA

nit)

A. f.' P.M.

SEE ACCOMPANYING MAP(S) IDENTIFIED AS

1 - 00^/3 '-3

LOCATED IN THE MAP CHANNEL IN THEFOLLOWING SEQUENCE

(x)

NOIlVIAiaOdNI

•WNOiiicrav aod-t

CJR

AT

iON

M

IND

A P

\

A i/ p

A Q

CT

A

Mix

L-

-A

JA

Li

A i\

L~ A

AE

RO

DA

T L

IMIT

ED

Z.

o

\\

DU

RA

TIO

N

MIN

ES

LT

D.

DO

UG

iE

LAK

E-M

CV

ICA

R

LAK

E

AR

EA

1SW

0IB

21

5^0

1!S

Wa043

MC

VIC

AR

LA

KE

210

VA

ER

OD

AT

LIM

ITE

D

;

o

o

O

r-

o

o

o

oo

o

o

o

Xv

-

\

DU

RA

TIO

N

MIN

ES

LT

D.

VL

F-E

M

TO

T A

, F

iEL'.)

C

ON

TO

UR

S

DO

UG

IE

LAK

E-M

CV

ICA

R

LAK

E

AR

EA

DA

TE

T A

ER

OD

AT

LIM

ITE

D

June

19

86

52-

O

OO

o

\

\

DU

RA

TIO

N

MIN

ES

LT

D.

VLF

E

M T

OT

AL F

IELD

CO

NT

OU

RS

DOUGIE LAKE-MCVICAR LAKE AREA

ON

TA

RIO

se:

25C

W A

ER

OD

AT

LIM

ITE

D

June

19

86

52-0

E30