alternatives analysis memorandum florida department …

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TECHNICAL REPORT COVERSHEET650-050-38

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

06/17

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM

Florida Department of Transportation

District One

Big Carlos Pass Bridge Replacement

Limits of Project: From Estrellita Drive to south of the Lovers Key State Park Entrance

Lee County, Florida

Financial Management Number: 445323-1-22-01

ETDM Number: 14301

Date: January 2020

The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by FDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. § 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 14, 2016 and executed by FHWA and FDOT.

DRAFT

Alternatives Analysis Memorandum Big Carlos Pass Bridge PD&E Study January 2020 i Project No. CN160002

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................1-1

Project Description ..................................................................................................1-1

Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................1-2

Existing Conditions .................................................................................................1-3

Project Design Standards ..............................................................................2-1

Alternatives Analysis ......................................................................................3-1

No-Build Alternative ................................................................................................3-1

Build Alternatives Evaluation ..................................................................................3-1

Vertical and Horizontal Navigation Clearances ........................................3-1 Typical Sections ......................................................................................3-2 Viable Alternatives ...................................................................................3-3

Preferred Alternative ......................................................................................4-1

Selection of Preferred Alternative ...........................................................................4-1

Horizontal and Vertical Geometry ...........................................................................4-1

Preferred Alternative Evaluation Matrix ...................................................................4-1

List of Technical Reports ...............................................................................5-1

LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Design Criteria ....................................................................................................... 2-1

Table 3-1 Alternatives Public Workshop Evaluation Matrix ..................................................... 3-6

Table 4-1 Preferred Alternative Horizontal Alignment ............................................................. 4-1

Table 4-2 Preferred Alternative Vertical Alignment ................................................................. 4-1

Table 4-3 Preferred Alternative Evaluation Matrix .................................................................. 4-2

Table 5-1 Technical Reports .................................................................................................. 5-1

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Project Location Map ............................................................................................ 1-1

Figure 3-1 At-grade Roadway Typical Section ....................................................................... 3-2

Figure 3-2 Elevated Roadway Typical Section ....................................................................... 3-3

Figure 3-3 Bridge Typical Section .......................................................................................... 3-3

DRAFT

Alternatives Analysis Memorandum Big Carlos Pass Bridge PD&E Study January 2020 ii Project No. CN160002

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Summary of Bridge Tender Logs

Appendix B U.S. Coast Guard Coordination

Appendix C Preferred Alternative Concept Plans

Appendix D Cost Estimates

DRAFT

Alternatives Analysis Memorandum Big Carlos Pass Bridge PD&E Study January 2020 1-1 Project No. CN160002

INTRODUCTION

Project Description The Lee County Department of Transportation (LCDOT) is conducting a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study to evaluate potential improvements to the Big Carlos Pass Bridge on County Road 865 (Estero Boulevard). The PD&E study corridor is 1.2 miles in length, extending eastward from Redfish Road in the Town of Ft. Myers Beach, as shown in Figure 1-1. The corridor includes the Big Carlos Pass navigable waterway and is adjacent to the Estero Bay Aquatic Preserve and Lovers Key State Park.

Figure 1-1 Project Location Map

The purpose of the PD&E study is to evaluate engineering and environmental data and to document information that will aid Lee County in determining the type, preliminary design and location of the proposed improvements. The study was conducted to meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other related federal and state laws, rules and regulations. The project was screened through the Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) process as ETDM Number 14301. The results were published in the Final Programming Screen Summary Report on January 3, 2018, with comments from the Environmental Technical

DRAFT

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION


Advisory Team (ETAT). The ETAT evaluated the project’s effects on various natural, physical and social resources. The approved Class of Action was determined to be a Type 2 Categorical Exclusion.

Purpose and Need The following Purpose and Need statement was reviewed and accepted by OEM on April 7, 2017:

The purpose of the Big Carlos Pass Bridge project is to identify the optimal solution for a deteriorating structure, built in 1965, that has exceeded its design life. The project will evaluate alternatives for rehabilitation or replacement on approximately one mile of roadway that provides a connection between nearby coastal neighborhoods and Lovers Key State Park. The need for the proposed bridge project is based on the following criteria:

PRIMARY CRITERIA

ROADWAY DEFICIENCIES

The Big Carlos Pass Bridge was constructed in 1965 and is now over fifty years old. While the bridge is well maintained and remains safe for use, bridges built in this era were typically designed anticipating a fifty-year design life. It no longer meets design standards, which makes it "functionally obsolete." The National Bridge Inventory Data indicates that Big Carlos Pass Bridge has a sufficiency rating of 50.6 percent (on a scale of 0-100). The bridge deck (supporting surface), superstructure (structural elements), and substructure (foundation) all have a "Fair" rating of 5 out of 9. A 2015 Bridge Inspection Report identifies the bridge as being "fracture critical" meaning that the steel member of the bridge is nonredundant, in tension, and if it fails, it would result in removal of the bridge from service. It is also "scour critical" due to the swift moving waters in Big Carlos Pass that have removed stabilizing materials from around the pier footings over the last fifty years. While the bridge remains safe for use, a hurricane or other severe weather event could undermine the bridge piers and take the bridge out of service. Additionally, due to the corrosive coastal environment, chlorides have caused ongoing deterioration of the structure steel members of the moveable span and reinforcing steel within the reinforced concrete bridge components, limiting service much beyond the current timeframe. According to 2015 traffic counts, the existing Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volume on the bridge is 9,600 vehicles per day.

SECONDARY CRITERIA

SAFETY: EVACUATION ROUTE

Serving as part of the evacuation route network established by the Florida Division of Emergency Management, Big Carlos Pass Bridge (CR 865/Estero Boulevard) plays a significant role in facilitating traffic during emergency evacuation periods as it is one of several key bridges on the barrier islands of Estero Bay to accommodate travel to the mainland. The project is located in Lee County's Evacuation Zone "A." This zone is the most vulnerable area for storm surge and high winds and will be the first to be impacted for a land-falling storm. Zone "A" will be the first area to be ordered to evacuate during such an event. Maintaining the integrity of this bridge will further enhance emergency evacuation efficiency leading to improved evacuation and response times.

DRAFT

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION


Existing Conditions A Bridge Development Report was prepared under separate cover and documents existing conditions information within the project area, including utilities, archaeological sites, potential contamination, geotechnical conditions, bridge hydraulics, and lighting. The existing Lee County right-of-way width within the project area varies from 100 feet to 400 feet, as depicted on the concept plans included in Appendix C.

DRAFT


PROJECT DESIGN STANDARDS

The design criteria used for the Big Carlos Pass Bridge build alternatives are listed in Table 2-1 and adhere to Lee County criteria and the 2016 Florida Greenbook (FG). This criteria was used to develop and evaluate the alternatives described in Section 3.2.

Table 2-1 Design Criteria

Design Element Value Source

Typi

cal S

ectio

n

Roadway Type Urban Major Arterial Lee County

Design Speed (mph) 40 Lee County

Min. Lane Widths (ft) 10 FG Table 3-10

Min. Bike Lane Widths (ft) 5 FG Ch. 9, Sec. B.1

Min. Median Width (ft) 0 FG Ch. 3, Sec. C.7.e

Sidewalk Width

Without Landscape Buffer (ft) 6 FG Ch. 8, Sec. B.1

With Landscape Buffer (ft) 5 FG Ch. 8, Sec. B.1

Min. Landscape Buffer (ft) 2 FG Ch. 8, Sec. B.1

Shared Use Path Width (ft) 10 FG Ch. 9, Sec. C.1

Clear Zone Width / Recoverable Terrain (ft) 4 FG Table 3-15

Horiz

onta

l

Min. Stopping Sight Distance (ft) 305 FG Table 3-3

Length of Curve Desirable (ft) 600 Lee County

Min. (ft) 400 Lee County

Max. Superelevation (%) 5 FG Ch. 3, Sec. C.4.b

Max. Curvature (e=NC) (ft) 1,528 FG Figure 3-2

Max. Curvature (e max=0.05) (ft) 510 FG Table 3-5

Vert

ical

Max. Grade (Flat Terrain) (%) 7 FG Table 3-7

Max. Change in Grade without Vertical Curve (%) 0.8 FG Table 3-8

Crest Curve K Value 44 FG Table 3-9

Min. Length (ft) 120 FG Table 3-9

Sag Curve K Value 64 FG Table 3-9

Min. Length (ft) 120 FG Table 3-9

DRAFT


ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

The objective of the alternatives analysis process is to identify technically and environmentally sound alternatives that meet the needs of the project, are cost-effective, and are acceptable to the community. This section describes the alternatives considered and the results of the alternatives evaluation.

No-Build Alternative The No-Build Alternative assumes that the existing Big Carlos Pass Bridge will undergo structural rehabilitation and remain in service until the year 2040. At that time, the bridge will have deteriorated to a condition beyond practical repair and will require complete replacement to ensure the safe crossing of Big Carlos Pass.

The following are the advantages and limitations associated with the No-Build Alternative:

Advantages of the No-Build Alternative

• No modification of the existing bridge elevation • No horizontal shift of the roadway approaches or bridge location • No relocation of the Lovers Key State Park bridge-side access point • No relocation of the Lovers Key Beach Club access point

Limitations of the No-Build Alternative

• Does not meet the purpose and need of the project • Maintains substandard 3-foot sidewalk widths • Does not accommodate a shared-use path • Requires costly rehabilitation of the existing bridge • Requires complete reconstruction of the bridge in 2040 • Incompatibility with the adopted Lee County MPO Long Range Transportation Plan

The No-Build Alternative will remain a viable alternative throughout this PD&E study.

Build Alternatives Evaluation

Vertical and Horizontal Navigation Clearances In 2017 a waterway navigation survey was sent out to area residents to gather information on the heights and types of vessels traversing through Big Carlos Pass. A total of 355 responses were received from vessel owners and the tallest vessel was reported to be 60 feet in height. The Big Carlos Pass Bridge tender logs for years 2014, 2015, and 2016 were also evaluated to determine the mast heights of vessels traversing through Big Carlos Pass as recorded by the on-duty bridge tenders. The tender log evaluation found that a fixed bridge with a 60-foot vertical clearance allowance would accommodate approximately 95.5% of the vessels that navigated through Big

DRAFT

SECTION 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS


Carlos Pass during the three-year period. The results of the navigation survey and bridge tender log evaluation were included in a Navigation Impact Summary Memorandum that was transmitted to the U.S. Coast Guard for a preliminary determination of the vertical clearance requirement of a fixed bridge build alternative. The U.S. Coast Guard determined that a minimum vertical clearance of 60 feet and a minimum horizontal clearance of 90 feet would be appropriate for the evaluation of fixed bridge build alternatives at Big Carlos Pass. The summaries of the bridge tender logs are included in Appendix A and the U.S. Coast Guard preliminary determination of vertical clearance is included in Appendix B.

Typical Sections As discussed in Section 2.0, the initial build alternatives were developed using Lee County and 2016 Florida Greenbook design criteria. The alternatives were evaluated and presented at the January 2018 Alternatives Public Workshop.

The build alternatives require two roadway typical sections to accommodate both the at-grade and elevated roadway approaches on either side of the bridge. The at-grade roadway typical section is shown in Figure 3-1 and consists of two 10-foot travel lanes and an 11-foot center turn lane. A six-foot sidewalk, 10-foot shared use path, and five-foot bicycle lanes provide bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. The at-grade typical section changes to the elevated roadway scenario shown in Figure 3-2 to allow for an increase in the roadway’s profile as it approaches the bridge. The elevated roadway typical section consists of two 12-foot travel lanes, seven-foot bicycle lanes, a six-foot sidewalk, and a 10-foot shared use path. The underlying earthwork is stabilized using a retaining wall system. The elevated roadway typical section ties into the bridge typical section shown in Figure 3-3, which then allows CR 865 to span Big Carlos Pass. As shown in Table 2-1, the design speed of the typical sections is 40 mph.

Figure 3-1 At-grade Roadway Typical Section

DRAFT



Figure 3-2 Elevated Roadway Typical Section

Figure 3-3 Bridge Typical Section

Viable Alternatives

3.2.3.1 Alternative 1: Low-Level Drawbridge, Gulf Side Alignment Alternative 1 involves constructing a new low-level drawbridge along the Gulf of Mexico side of the existing bridge. The proposed drawbridge would provide 24.5 feet of vertical clearance above the Mean High Water (MHW) elevation when the bridge is in the closed position, and unlimited vertical clearance when the bridge is in the open position. This alternative would use the existing navigation channel alignment and would provide 50 feet of horizontal navigation width within a fender system under the bascule span. Alternative 1 would allow the passage of 100% of the watercraft currently navigating through Big Carlos Pass. The roadway approaches, bridge, and

DRAFT



stormwater management facilities would be constructed entirely within existing Lee County right-of-way. The existing bridge would be demolished following the construction of the proposed bridge.

3.2.3.2 Alternative 2: Low-Level Drawbridge, Bay Side Alignment Alternative 2 involves constructing a new low-level drawbridge along the Estero Bay side of the existing bridge. The proposed drawbridge would provide 24.5 feet of vertical clearance above MHW when the bridge is in the closed position, and unlimited vertical clearance when the bridge is in the open position. This alternative would use the existing navigation channel alignment and would provide 50 feet of horizontal navigation width within a fender system under the bascule span. Alternative 2 would allow the passage of 100% of the watercraft currently navigating through Big Carlos Pass. The roadway approaches, bridge, and stormwater management facilities would be constructed entirely within existing Lee County right-of-way. The existing bridge would be demolished following the construction of the proposed bridge.

3.2.3.3 Alternative 3: High-Level Fixed Bridge, Gulf Side Alignment Alternative 3 involves constructing a new fixed bridge along the Gulf of Mexico side of the existing bridge. The proposed bridge would provide 60 feet of vertical clearance above MHW. This alternative would relocate the navigation channel 303 feet east of the existing channel, towards Lovers Key, to facilitate a shift in the bridge’s crest. Shifting the crest of the bridge toward Lovers Key allows for a touchdown point on Estero Island that accommodates connection to the existing driveway location at the Islands End II residential building. The relocated channel would provide a minimum of 90 feet of horizontal navigation width under a fixed span. Alternative 3 would allow the passage of approximately 95.5% of the watercraft that navigated through Big Carlos Pass during the years of 2014, 2015, and 2016, as discussed in Section 3.2.1. The roadway approaches, bridge, and stormwater management facilities would be constructed entirely within existing Lee County right-of-way. The existing bridge would be demolished following the construction of the proposed bridge.

3.2.3.4 Alternative 4: High-Level Fixed Bridge, Bay Side Alignment Alternative 4 involves constructing a new fixed bridge along the Estero Bay side of the existing bridge. The proposed bridge would provide 60 feet of vertical clearance above MHW. This alternative would relocate the navigation channel 303 feet east of the existing channel, towards Lovers Key, to facilitate a shift in the bridge’s crest. Shifting the crest of the bridge toward Lovers Key allows for a touchdown point on Estero Island that accommodates connection to the existing driveway location at the Islands End II residential building. The relocated channel would provide a minimum of 90 feet of horizontal navigation width under a fixed span. Alternative 4 would allow the passage of approximately 95.5% of the watercraft that navigated through Big Carlos Pass during the years of 2014, 2015, and 2016, as discussed in Section 3.2.1. The roadway approaches, bridge, and stormwater management facilities would be constructed entirely within existing Lee County right-of-way. The existing bridge would be demolished following the construction of the proposed bridge.

DRAFT



3.2.3.5 Evaluation Matrix Each build alternative was evaluated based on environmental effects, residential and business relocations, right-of-way needs, and project costs. The matrix shown in Table 3-1 was displayed at the Alternatives Public Workshop on January 18, 2018, to share the results of the alternatives evaluation process. It quantifies considerations such as potential business and residential relocations, impacts to environmental resources, and the acres of right-of-way needed for roadway improvements and stormwater facilities. The potential for impacts to archaeological and historic sites, noise sensitive sites, recreational areas, threatened and endangered species, and existing utilities was qualified in the matrix. The matrix also contains estimated costs for design, right-of-way acquisition, construction, and construction engineering and inspection. The estimates were based on 2017 costs, and construction cost estimates and project life cycle costs are provided in Appendix D.

DRAFT



Table 3-1 Alternatives Public Workshop Evaluation Matrix

EVALUATION FACTORS No-Build

Alternative (Repair)1

Alternative 1 Low-Level

Drawbridge Gulf Side Alignment

Alternative 2 Low-Level

Drawbridge Bay Side

Alignment

Alternative 3 High-Level

Fixed Bridge Gulf Side Alignment

Alternative 4 High-Level

Fixed Bridge Bay Side

Alignment Vertical Navigation Clearance 24.5 ft 24.5 ft 24.5 ft 60 ft 60 ft Horizontal Navigation Clearance 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft 90 ft 90 ft

Right-of-Way Impacts Parcels Impacted 0 0 0 0 0 Relocations (Business/Residential) 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac

Social, Natural, and Physical Resources Species/Habitat Potential Impacts None Medium Medium Medium Medium Potential Contamination Sites (Medium/High) 0/0 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 Wetland Impacts 0 ac 0.07 ac 0.07 ac 1.9 ac 1.9 ac Seagrass Impacts 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac Live Bottom Impacts 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac Archaeological and Historic Site Impacts None None None None None Traffic Noise Impacts None Low Low Low Low Public Parks and Recreational Areas Impacts None Low Low Low Low Aquatic Preserve Impacts None None Low None Low

Utility Impacts Bonita Springs Utilities None Low Low Low Low Century Link None Medium Low Medium Low Comcast None Low Low Low Low Florida Power and Light None Medium Low Medium Low Lee County Utilities None Medium Low Medium Low Town of Ft. Myers Beach None Low Low Low Low

Estimated Project Costs (2017 Dollars)2 Design (10% of Construction Cost) $2,448,000 $5,059,000 $5,045,000 $4,012,000 $4,012,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Roadway Construction $0 $2,085,000 $1,946,000 $5,426,000 $5,426,000 Bridge Construction $24,478,000 $48,509,000 $48,509,000 $34,695,000 $34,695,000 CEI (10% of Construction Cost) $2,448,000 $5,059,000 $5,045,000 $4,012,000 $4,012,000 Subtotal, Initial Capital Investment $29,374,000 $60,712,000 $60,545,000 $48,145,000 $48,145,000 Bridge Lifecycle Maintenance and Operations $10,846,000 $106,891,000 $106,871,000 $39,626,000 $39,626,000 Total Project Cost $40,220,0003 $167,603,000 $167,416,000 $87,771,000 $87,771,000

Life of Alternative 20 years 75 years 75 years 75 years 75 years Notes: (1) The No-Build Alternative bridge repairs will extend the useful life of the bridge by approximately 20 years, after which replacement will be required. (2) Costs are estimated for the life of the alternative using a 4% inflation rate. (3) Cost for 20-year life of the No-Build Alternative. Total 75-year cost with bridge replacement at the end of the 20-year life of the No-Build Alternative is: (a) $183M if replaced with a High-Level Fixed Bridge, or (b) $276M if replaced with a Low-Level Drawbridge.

DRAFT


PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Selection of Preferred Alternative Based on the evaluation of the alternatives described in Section 3.0, Alternative 3: High-Level Fixed Bridge Alternative, Gulf Side Alignment, was selected as the Preferred Alternative to meet the documented purpose and need for this project. A Bridge Development Report has been prepared to document the structural details and construction methods of the Preferred Alternative.

Horizontal and Vertical Geometry The horizontal alignment for the Preferred Alternative contains four horizontal curves within the project limits and is described in Table 4-1. The vertical alignment of the Preferred Alternative contains three vertical curves and is described in Table 4-2. The maximum deck elevation of the Preferred Alternative is approximately 71.1 feet. Plan and profile sheets illustrating the Preferred Alternative are included in Appendix C.

Table 4-1 Preferred Alternative Horizontal Alignment

Centerline PI Station

Degree of Curvature Radius (ft) Length (ft) Superelevation

Rate (ft/ft)*

411+41.30 2° 30' 2,291.83 583.39 NC

416+58.98 2° 00' 2,864.79 454.19 NC

429+93.05 2° 00' 2,864.79 412.84 NC

442+71.06 2° 00' 2,864.79 2,051.48 NC

Table 4-2 Preferred Alternative Vertical Alignment

Centerline PI Station Type Length (ft)

Elevation Grade Back (%)

Grade Ahead (%) Begin (ft) End (ft)

410+31.00 Sag 339 5.30 13.27 -0.300 +5.000

425+32.59 Crest 700 62.37 62.37 +5.000 -5.000

439+93.52 Sag 301 14.34 6.37 -5.000 -0.300

Preferred Alternative Evaluation Matrix The Preferred Alternative evaluation matrix is shown in Table 4-3 and was presented at a Public Hearing on March 19, 2020. The Preferred Alternative results in 1.9 acres of wetland impacts and no impacts to the Estero Bay Aquatic Preserve. The initial capital investment cost of the Preferred Alternative is $48,145,000 and is expected to provide a total structural life of 75 years.

DRAFT

SECTION 4.0 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE


Table 4-3 Preferred Alternative Evaluation Matrix

EVALUATION FACTORS No-Build

Alternative (Repair)1

Preferred Alternative

Vertical Navigation Clearance 24.5 ft 60 ft Horizontal Navigation Clearance 50 ft 90 ft

Right-of-Way Impacts Parcels Impacted 0 0 Relocations (Business/Residential) 0/0 0/0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 0 ac 0 ac

Social, Natural, and Physical Resources Species/Habitat Potential Impacts None Medium Potential Contamination Sites (Medium/High) 0/0 0/1 Wetland Impacts 0 ac 1.9 ac Seagrass Impacts 0 ac 0 ac Live Bottom Impacts 0 ac 0 ac Archaeological and Historic Site Impacts None None Traffic Noise Impacts None Low Public Parks and Recreational Areas Impacts None Low Aquatic Preserve Impacts None None

Utility Impacts Bonita Springs Utilities None Low Century Link None Medium Comcast None Low Florida Power and Light None Medium Lee County Utilities None Medium Town of Ft. Myers Beach None Low

Estimated Project Costs (2017 Dollars)2 Design (10% of Construction Cost) $2,448,000 $4,135,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 Roadway Construction $0 $5,426,000 Bridge Construction $24,478,000 $35,919,000 CEI (10% of Construction Cost) $2,448,000 $4,135,000 Subtotal, Initial Capital Investment $29,374,000 $49,615,000 Bridge Lifecycle Maintenance and Operations $10,846,000 $38,157,000 Total Project Cost $40,220,0003 $87,772,000

Life of Alternative 20 years 75 years Notes: (1) The No-Build Alternative bridge repairs will extend the useful life of the bridge by approximately 20 years, after which replacement will be required. (2) Costs are estimated for the life of the alternative using a 4% inflation rate. (3) Cost for 20-year life of the No-Build Alternative. Total 75-year cost with bridge replacement at the end of the 20-year life of the No-Build Alternative is: (a) $183M if replaced with a High-Level Fixed Bridge, or (b) $276M if replaced with a Low-Level Drawbridge.

DRAFT


LIST OF TECHNICAL REPORTS

The purpose of the PD&E study is to evaluate engineering and environmental data and document information that will aid LCDOT in determining the type, preliminary design and location of the proposed improvements. The study was conducted in order to meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other related federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. The technical reports prepared in support of this study, along with their respective completion dates, are listed below.

Table 5-1 Technical Reports

Technical Report Completion Date

Public Involvement

Advance Notification Package February 2017

Comments and Coordination Report TBD

Public Hearing Transcript TBD

Public Involvement Plan January 2017

Engineering

Alternatives Analysis Memorandum January 2020 (Draft)

Bridge Development Report July 2019

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum August 2017

Drainage Technical Memorandum December 2017

Navigation Impact Summary Memorandum September 2017

Environmental

Contamination Screening Evaluation Report October 2017

Cultural Resource Assessment Survey November 2019

Natural Resources Evaluation January 2020

Noise Study Report August 2019

Type 2 Categorical Exclusion February 2020 (Draft)

Water Quality Impact Evaluation February 2020

DRAFT

APPENDIX A

Summary of Bridge Tender Logs

DRAFT

Big Carlos Pass Bridge PD&E Study

CN 160002

2016 Bridge Opening Summary

From (ft) To (ft) Total Count % of Total Count Cumulative % Unique Boats % of Unique Boats

≤ 21 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0%

>21 25 7 2.1% 2.1% 5 4.8%

>25 30 55 16.8% 19.0% 31 29.5%

>30 35 53 16.2% 35.2% 16 15.2%

>35 40 29 8.9% 44.0% 12 11.4%

>40 45 13 4.0% 48.0% 5 4.8%

>45 50 152 46.5% 94.5% 26 24.8%

>50 55 4 1.2% 95.7% 3 2.9%

>55 60 1 0.3% 96.0% 1 1.0%

>60 65 9 2.8% 98.8% 3 2.9%

>65 70 4 1.2% 100.0% 3 2.9%

>70 0 0.0% 100.0% 0 0.0%

327 100.0% 105 100.0%

Min Height (ft) 25

Max Height (ft) 70

Month Days in Month Openings Boats

Avg Openings per

Day Avg Boats per Day Total number of boats 327

January 31 35 37 1.13 1.19 Peak boat traffic month March

February 29 38 38 1.31 1.31 Peak boat traffic day Sunday

March 31 59 60 1.90 1.94 Average number of boats per day 0.89 (weekdays 0.84, weekend days 1.04)

April 30 36 36 1.20 1.20

May 31 16 16 0.52 0.52 Total number of openings 321

June 30 10 10 0.33 0.33 Peak bridge opening month March

July 31 8 8 0.26 0.26 Peak bridge opening day Sunday

August 31 7 7 0.23 0.23 Average number of openings per day 0.88 (weekdays 0.82, weekend days 1.02)

September 30 10 10 0.33 0.33

October 31 9 9 0.29 0.29 Average duration of opening (minutes) 3.6

November 30 47 48 1.57 1.60

December 31 46 48 1.48 1.55

366 321 327 0.88 0.89

Day Days in Year Openings Boats

Avg Openings per

Day of Week

Avg Boats per Day

of Week

Monday 52 47 48 0.90 0.92

Tuesday 52 52 52 1.00 1.00

Wednesday 52 45 46 0.87 0.88

Thursday 52 40 42 0.77 0.81

Friday 53 30 30 0.57 0.57

Saturday 53 46 47 0.87 0.89

Sunday 52 61 62 1.17 1.19

366 321 327 0.88 0.89

DRAFT


CN 160002



≤ 21 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0%

>21 25 15 3.6% 3.6% 8 8.2%

>25 30 80 19.2% 22.8% 28 28.9%

>30 35 81 19.5% 42.3% 12 12.4%

>35 40 57 13.7% 56.0% 10 10.3%

>40 45 9 2.2% 58.2% 5 5.2%

>45 50 144 34.6% 92.8% 17 17.5%

>50 55 2 0.5% 93.3% 2 2.1%

>55 60 7 1.7% 95.0% 2 2.1%

>60 65 5 1.2% 96.2% 4 4.1%

>65 70 14 3.4% 99.5% 9 9.3%

>70 0 0.0% 99.5% 0 0.0%

2 0.5% 100.0% 0 0.0%

416 100.0% 97 100.0%

Min Height (ft) 22

Max Height (ft) 70


Avg Openings per





April 30 50 50 1.67 1.67





September 30 7 7 0.23 0.23

October 31 18 19 0.58 0.61

November 30 32 32 1.07 1.07

December 31 23 23 0.74 0.74

365 408 416 1.12 1.14


Avg Openings per

Day of Week

Avg Boats per Day

of Week

Monday 52 68 69 1.31 1.33

Tuesday 52 33 33 0.63 0.63

Wednesday 52 45 47 0.87 0.90

Thursday 53 48 49 0.91 0.92

Friday 52 64 65 1.23 1.25

Saturday 52 74 74 1.42 1.42

Sunday 52 76 79 1.46 1.52

365 408 416 1.12 1.14

UNKNOWN

DRAFT


CN 160002



≤ 21 2 0.5% 0.5% 1 1.0%

>21 25 10 2.4% 2.8% 6 6.2%

>25 30 97 22.9% 25.8% 28 28.9%

>30 35 61 14.4% 40.2% 19 19.6%

>35 40 45 10.6% 50.8% 7 7.2%

>40 45 11 2.6% 53.4% 3 3.1%

>45 50 167 39.5% 92.9% 22 22.7%

>50 55 2 0.5% 93.4% 1 1.0%

>55 60 7 1.7% 95.0% 3 3.1%

>60 65 13 3.1% 98.1% 3 3.1%

>65 70 3 0.7% 98.8% 1 1.0%

>70 5 1.2% 100.0% 3 3.1%

423 100.0% 97 100.0%

Min Height (ft) 20

Max Height (ft) 80


Avg Openings per





April 30 54 56 1.80 1.87





September 30 17 17 0.57 0.57

October 31 41 41 1.32 1.32

November 30 39 41 1.30 1.37

December 31 29 30 0.94 0.97

365 411 423 1.13 1.16


Avg Openings per

Day of Week

Avg Boats per Day

of Week

Monday 52 75 77 1.44 1.48

Tuesday 52 38 39 0.73 0.75

Wednesday 53 48 48 0.91 0.91

Thursday 52 41 41 0.79 0.79

Friday 52 42 43 0.81 0.83

Saturday 52 82 84 1.58 1.62

Sunday 52 85 91 1.63 1.75

365 411 423 1.13 1.16

DRAFT

APPENDIX B

U.S. Coast Guard Coordination

DRAFT

APPENDIX C

Preferred Alternative Concept Plans

DRAFT

1/23/2020

bm

endoza

T:\

PR

OJE

CT

S\

Lee

Co Big Carlo

s\

Engin

eerin

g\

Road

way\

CA

DD\P

LA

N_

RE

C

ALT_

GU

LF_

HLF_01.d

gn

11:5

2:1

4

AM

160002CR 865

ROAD NO. CONTRACT NO.

NO.

SHEET

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

LEE COUNTY

PD&E STUDY

BIG CARLOS PASS BRIDGE

PRELIMINARY Aerial Flight Date: 2017

PROPOSED ROADWAY

PROPOSED BRIDGE

SHARED USE PATH

PROPOSED SIDEWALK/

¡ CONSTRUCTION

SURVEY/£

EXISTING R/W LINE

400

AIM ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC.

FAX: (813) 664-1899 WWW.AIMENGR.COM

TEL: (813) 627-4144

TAMPA, FLORIDA 33619

3802 CORPOREX PARK DRIVE, SUITE 225

RETAINING WALL

PROPOSED BARRIER/

PROPOSED DRIVEWAY

1

PT S

TA.

402+41.9

4

405

PC S

TA.

405+07.5

2

PC

C S

TA.

408

+48.0

2

410

PR

C S

TA.

414

+31.4

1

STA. 4

08+61.40

Estrellit

a Dr

Amberjac

k Dr

Estero Blvd

Marina Towers

Islands End III

Islands End II

Islands End I

Carlos Pointe

LEE

865COUNTY

85'

80'

100'

0 20 80

Feet

N

MA

TC

H LIN

ES

HE

ET 2

HTAP ESU DERAHS TF-01

Preferred Alternative: High-Level Fixed Bridge; Gulf Side Alignment

6-FT SIDEWALK

Touchdown Point

DRAFT

1/23/2020

bm

endoza

T:\

PR

OJE

CT

S\

Lee

Co Big Carlo

s\

Engin

eerin

g\

Road

way\

CA

DD\P

LA

N_

RE

C

ALT_

GU

LF_

HLF_02.d

gn

11:5

2:3

1

AM

160002CR 865


NO.

SHEET


LEE COUNTY

PD&E STUDY



PROPOSED ROADWAY

PROPOSED BRIDGE

SHARED USE PATH

PROPOSED SIDEWALK/

¡ CONSTRUCTION

SURVEY/£

EXISTING R/W LINE

400



TEL: (813) 627-4144



RETAINING WALL

PROPOSED BARRIER/

PROPOSED DRIVEWAY

2

PR

C S

TA.

414+31.4

1

415

PT S

TA.

418

+85.6

1

420 425

Estero Blvd

Aquatic Preserve

Estero Bay

Gulf of Mexico

LEE

865COUNTY

400'

0 20 80

Feet

N

MA

TC

H LIN

ES

HE

ET 3

MA

TC

H LIN

ES

HE

ET 1

10' from Existing Bridge

6-FT SIDEWALK

10-FT SHARED USE PATH


DRAFT

1/23/2020

bm

endoza

T:\

PR

OJE

CT

S\

Lee

Co Big Carlo

s\

Engin

eerin

g\

Road

way\

CA

DD\P

LA

N_

RE

C

ALT_

GU

LF_

HLF_03.d

gn

11:5

2:4

3

AM

160002CR 865


NO.

SHEET


LEE COUNTY

PD&E STUDY



PROPOSED ROADWAY

PROPOSED BRIDGE

SHARED USE PATH

PROPOSED SIDEWALK/

¡ CONSTRUCTION

SURVEY/£

EXISTING R/W LINE

400



TEL: (813) 627-4144



RETAINING WALL

PROPOSED BARRIER/

PROPOSED DRIVEWAY

3

PC S

TA.

427

+86.2

7

430

PR

C S

TA.

431

+99.1

2

435

Estero Blvd

Gulf of Mexico

Aquatic Preserve

Estero Bay

State Park

Lovers Key

Beach Club

Lovers Key

LEE

865COUNTY

250'

0 20 80

Feet

N

MA

TC

H LIN

ES

HE

ET 4

MA

TC

H LIN

ES

HE

ET 2

6-FT SIDEWALK

10-FT SHARED USE PATH


DRAFT

1/23/2020

bm

endoza

T:\

PR

OJE

CT

S\

Lee

Co Big Carlo

s\

Engin

eerin

g\

Road

way\

CA

DD\P

LA

N_

RE

C

ALT_

GU

LF_

HLF_04.d

gn

11:5

2:5

7

AM

160002CR 865


NO.

SHEET


LEE COUNTY

PD&E STUDY



PROPOSED ROADWAY

PROPOSED BRIDGE

SHARED USE PATH

PROPOSED SIDEWALK/

¡ CONSTRUCTION

SURVEY/£

EXISTING R/W LINE

400



TEL: (813) 627-4144



RETAINING WALL

PROPOSED BARRIER/

PROPOSED DRIVEWAY

4

440

445

450

ST

A.

441+43.9

2

ST

A. 449+51.6

7

Estero Blvd

State Park

Lovers Key

LEE

865COUNTY

400'

325'

0 20 80

Feet

N

MA

TC

H LIN

ES

HE

ET 3

End Construction

Touchdown Point

KLAWEDIS TF-6

HTAP ESU DERAHS T

F-01

KLAWEDIS TF-6


DRAFT

120')

≈Isla

nds End I (

120')

≈Isla

nds End II (

140')

≈Lovers

Key

Beach

Clu

b (

1/23/2020

bm

endoza

T:\

PR

OJE

CT

S\

Lee

Co Big Carlo

s\

Engin

eerin

g\

Road

way\

CA

DD\P

LA

N_

RE

C

ALT_

GU

LF_

HLF_05.d

gn

11:5

3:1

3

AM

NO.

SHEET

PRELIMINARY

160002CR 865



LEE COUNTY

PD&E STUDY

BIG CARLOS PASS BRIDGEAIM ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC.


TEL: (813) 627-4144



EXISTING PROFILE

PROPOSED PROFILE

OF ADJACENT BUILDINGS

APPROXIMATE PROJECTION 5

PRELIMINARY

50')

≈Isla

nds End III (

PI +31.0

0

EL.

4.7

9

339' V.C.

K = 64

+61.4

0 E

L.

5.3

0

+00.6

0 E

L.

13.2

7

(-) 0.3%

PI +93.5

2

EL.

6.8

2

301' V.C.

K = 64

+43.1

2 E

L.

14.3

4

+43.9

2 E

L.

6.3

7

700' V.C.

K = 70

+82.5

9 E

L.

62.3

7

+82.5

9 E

L.

62.3

7

PI +32.5

9

EL.

79.8

7

PI +72.8

9

EL.

5.6

8

50'

Estrellita

Dr

Isla

nds End

D/

W

Beach Parkin

g

Bla

ck Isla

nd

D/

W

VERTICAL: 1" = 30'

HORIZONTAL: 1" = 300'

SCALE

+1.9'

+24.6'

0

10

20

-10

30

40

70

80

50

60

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

405+00 410+00 415+00 420+00 425+00 430+00 435+00 440+00 445+00

Bla

ck Isla

nd

D/

WBeach Parkin

g and

Relo

cated

(+) 0.129%

(+) 5.0

%

(+) 0.0%

0

10

20

-10

30

40

70

80

50

60

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

90'

303-FT CHANNEL SHIFT

5% GRADES

VERTICAL CLEARANCE = 60 FT

MAX. DECK EL.: 71.1 FT (+40.1 FT)

7.95'

(-) 5.0%

+4.1'

303'

60' V.C.

CH

AN

NE

LE

XIS

TIN

G

CH

AN

NE

LP

RO

PO

SE

D

MHW EL. 1.4' (NGVD: 1929)

21.57' 24.90'

BRIDGE LENGTH = 2266'

(MIN.)


DRAFT

APPENDIX D

Cost Estimates

DRAFT

Alternative 1

Bridge Construction

Roadway

Construction Design (1)

R/W CEI (2)

Sub-Total

Operation

Costs(3)

Routine (3)

Maintenance Sub-Total Inflation (4%) Total

1 2017 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 100.00% $188,983

2 2018 $5,059,373 $5,059,373 $98,429 $90,554 $5,248,356 104.00% $5,458,291

3 2019 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 108.16% $204,404

4 2020 $48,508,734 $2,085,000 $5,059,373 $55,653,107 $98,429 $90,554 $55,842,090 112.49% $62,814,757

5 2021 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 116.99% $221,083

6 2022 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 121.67% $185,858

7 2023 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 126.53% $193,292

8 2024 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 131.59% $201,024

9 2025 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 136.86% $209,065

10 2026 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 142.33% $217,427

11 2027 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 148.02% $226,124

12 2028 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 153.95% $235,169

13 2029 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 160.10% $244,576

14 2030 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 166.51% $254,359

15 2031 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 173.17% $264,533

16 2032 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 180.09% $275,115

17 2033 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 187.30% $286,119

18 2034 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 194.79% $297,564

19 2035 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 202.58% $309,467

20 2036 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 210.68% $321,845

21 2037 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 219.11% $334,719

22 2038 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 227.88% $348,108

23 2039 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 236.99% $362,032

24 2040 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 246.47% $376,513

25 2041 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 256.33% $391,574

26 2042 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 266.58% $407,237

27 2043 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 277.25% $423,526

28 2044 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 288.34% $440,467

29 2045 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 299.87% $458,086

30 2046 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 311.87% $476,410

31 2047 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 324.34% $553,619

32 2048 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 337.31% $575,764

33 2049 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 350.81% $598,794

34 2050 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 364.84% $622,746

35 2051 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 379.43% $647,656

36 2052 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 394.61% $673,562

37 2053 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 410.39% $700,505

38 2054 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 426.81% $728,525

39 2055 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 443.88% $757,666

40 2056 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 461.64% $787,973

41 2057 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 480.10% $819,491

42 2058 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 499.31% $852,271

43 2059 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 519.28% $886,362

44 2060 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 540.05% $921,816

45 2061 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 561.65% $958,689

46 2062 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 584.12% $997,037

47 2063 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 607.48% $1,036,918

48 2064 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 631.78% $1,078,395

49 2065 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 657.05% $1,121,531

50 2066 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 683.33% $1,166,392

51 2067 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 710.67% $1,213,048

52 2068 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 739.10% $1,261,569

53 2069 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 768.66% $1,312,032

54 2070 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 799.41% $1,364,514

55 2071 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 831.38% $1,419,094

56 2072 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 864.64% $1,630,885

57 2073 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 899.22% $1,696,120

58 2074 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 935.19% $1,763,965

59 2075 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 972.60% $1,834,523

60 2076 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1011.50% $1,907,904

61 2077 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1051.96% $1,984,220

62 2078 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1094.04% $2,063,589

63 2079 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1137.80% $2,146,133

64 2080 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1183.32% $2,231,978

65 2081 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1230.65% $2,321,257

66 2082 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1279.87% $2,414,107

67 2083 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1331.07% $2,510,672

68 2084 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1384.31% $2,611,099

69 2085 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1439.68% $2,715,543

70 2086 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1497.27% $2,824,164

71 2087 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1557.16% $2,937,131

72 2088 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1619.45% $3,054,616

73 2089 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1684.23% $3,176,801

74 2090 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1751.60% $3,303,873

75 2091 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1821.66% $3,436,028

76 2092 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1894.53% $3,573,469

77 2093 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1970.31% $3,716,408

78 2094 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2049.12% $3,865,064

79 2095 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2131.08% $4,019,666

80 2096 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2216.33% $4,180,453

$48,508,734 $2,085,000 $5,059,373 $0 $5,059,373 $60,712,481 $7,874,320 $5,872,427 $74,459,228 $167,603,3621 Design fee equivalent to 10% of construction fee.

2 CEI fee equivalent to 10% of construction fee.

3 Operation and Maintenance Costs based on historical cost record from the existing Big Carlos and Matlacha bascule bridges.

Year

Total

G:\1201541 Big Carlos PDnE\Structures\eng_data\Life Cycle\BigCarlosPass_LifeCycle_12-08-17.xlsx 12/8/2017

DRAFT

Alternative 2

Bridge Construction

Roadway


R/W CEI (2)

Sub-Total

Operation

Costs(3)

Routine (3)


1 2017 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 100.00% $188,983

2 2018 $5,045,473 $5,045,473 $98,429 $90,554 $5,234,456 104.00% $5,443,835

3 2019 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 108.16% $204,404

4 2020 $48,508,734 $1,946,000 $5,045,473 $55,500,207 $98,429 $90,554 $55,689,190 112.49% $62,642,765

5 2021 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 116.99% $221,083

6 2022 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 121.67% $185,858

7 2023 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 126.53% $193,292

8 2024 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 131.59% $201,024

9 2025 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 136.86% $209,065

10 2026 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 142.33% $217,427

11 2027 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 148.02% $226,124

12 2028 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 153.95% $235,169

13 2029 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 160.10% $244,576

14 2030 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 166.51% $254,359

15 2031 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 173.17% $264,533

16 2032 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 180.09% $275,115

17 2033 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 187.30% $286,119

18 2034 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 194.79% $297,564

19 2035 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 202.58% $309,467

20 2036 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 210.68% $321,845

21 2037 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 219.11% $334,719

22 2038 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 227.88% $348,108

23 2039 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 236.99% $362,032

24 2040 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 246.47% $376,513

25 2041 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 256.33% $391,574

26 2042 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 266.58% $407,237

27 2043 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 277.25% $423,526

28 2044 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 288.34% $440,467

29 2045 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 299.87% $458,086

30 2046 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 311.87% $476,410

31 2047 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 324.34% $553,619

32 2048 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 337.31% $575,764

33 2049 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 350.81% $598,794

34 2050 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 364.84% $622,746

35 2051 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 379.43% $647,656

36 2052 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 394.61% $673,562

37 2053 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 410.39% $700,505

38 2054 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 426.81% $728,525

39 2055 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 443.88% $757,666

40 2056 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 461.64% $787,973

41 2057 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 480.10% $819,491

42 2058 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 499.31% $852,271

43 2059 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 519.28% $886,362

44 2060 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 540.05% $921,816

45 2061 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 561.65% $958,689

46 2062 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 584.12% $997,037

47 2063 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 607.48% $1,036,918

48 2064 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 631.78% $1,078,395

49 2065 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 657.05% $1,121,531

50 2066 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 683.33% $1,166,392

51 2067 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 710.67% $1,213,048

52 2068 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 739.10% $1,261,569

53 2069 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 768.66% $1,312,032

54 2070 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 799.41% $1,364,514

55 2071 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 831.38% $1,419,094

56 2072 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 864.64% $1,630,885

57 2073 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 899.22% $1,696,120

58 2074 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 935.19% $1,763,965

59 2075 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 972.60% $1,834,523

60 2076 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1011.50% $1,907,904

61 2077 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1051.96% $1,984,220

62 2078 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1094.04% $2,063,589

63 2079 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1137.80% $2,146,133

64 2080 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1183.32% $2,231,978

65 2081 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1230.65% $2,321,257

66 2082 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1279.87% $2,414,107

67 2083 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1331.07% $2,510,672

68 2084 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1384.31% $2,611,099

69 2085 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1439.68% $2,715,543

70 2086 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1497.27% $2,824,164

71 2087 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1557.16% $2,937,131

72 2088 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1619.45% $3,054,616

73 2089 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1684.23% $3,176,801

74 2090 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1751.60% $3,303,873

75 2091 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1821.66% $3,436,028

76 2092 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1894.53% $3,573,469

77 2093 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1970.31% $3,716,408

78 2094 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2049.12% $3,865,064

79 2095 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2131.08% $4,019,666

80 2096 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2216.33% $4,180,453



3 Operation and Maintenance Costs based on historical cost record from the existing Big Carlos and Matlacha bascule bridges.

Year

Total


DRAFT

Alternatives 3 and 4

Bridge

Construction

Roadway


R/W CEI (2)

Sub-Total

Operation

Costs

Routine


1 2017 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 100.00% $188,983

2 2018 $4,012,105 $4,012,105 $98,429 $90,554 $4,201,088 104.00% $4,369,131

3 2019 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 108.16% $204,404

4 2020 $34,695,048 $5,426,000 $4,012,105 $44,133,153 $98,429 $90,554 $44,322,136 112.49% $49,856,375

5 2021 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 116.99% $221,083

6 2022 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 121.67% $39,541

7 2023 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 126.53% $41,123

8 2024 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 131.59% $42,768

9 2025 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 136.86% $44,478

10 2026 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 142.33% $46,258

11 2027 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 148.02% $48,108

12 2028 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 153.95% $50,032

13 2029 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 160.10% $52,034

14 2030 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 166.51% $54,115

15 2031 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 173.17% $56,279

16 2032 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 180.09% $58,531

17 2033 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 187.30% $60,872

18 2034 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 194.79% $63,307

19 2035 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 202.58% $65,839

20 2036 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 210.68% $68,473

21 2037 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 219.11% $71,212

22 2038 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 227.88% $74,060

23 2039 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 236.99% $77,022

24 2040 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 246.47% $80,103

25 2041 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 256.33% $83,307

26 2042 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 266.58% $86,640

27 2043 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 277.25% $90,105

28 2044 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 288.34% $93,709

29 2045 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 299.87% $97,458

30 2046 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 311.87% $101,356

31 2047 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 324.34% $145,953

32 2048 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 337.31% $151,791

33 2049 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 350.81% $157,863

34 2050 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 364.84% $164,177

35 2051 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 379.43% $170,744

36 2052 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 394.61% $177,574

37 2053 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 410.39% $184,677

38 2054 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 426.81% $192,064

39 2055 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 443.88% $199,747

40 2056 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 461.64% $207,736

41 2057 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 480.10% $216,046

42 2058 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 499.31% $224,688

43 2059 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 519.28% $233,675

44 2060 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 540.05% $243,022

45 2061 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 561.65% $252,743

46 2062 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 584.12% $262,853

47 2063 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 607.48% $273,367

48 2064 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 631.78% $284,302

49 2065 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 657.05% $295,674

50 2066 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 683.33% $307,501

51 2067 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 710.67% $319,801

52 2068 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 739.10% $332,593

53 2069 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 768.66% $345,896

54 2070 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 799.41% $359,732

55 2071 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 831.38% $374,122

56 2072 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 864.64% $605,246

57 2073 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 899.22% $629,456

58 2074 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 935.19% $654,634

59 2075 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 972.60% $680,819

60 2076 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1011.50% $708,052

61 2077 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1051.96% $736,374

62 2078 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1094.04% $765,829

63 2079 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1137.80% $796,462

64 2080 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1183.32% $828,321

65 2081 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1230.65% $861,453

66 2082 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1279.87% $895,911

67 2083 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1331.07% $931,748

68 2084 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1384.31% $969,018

69 2085 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1439.68% $1,007,779

70 2086 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1497.27% $1,048,090

71 2087 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1557.16% $1,090,013

72 2088 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1619.45% $1,133,614

73 2089 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1684.23% $1,178,958

74 2090 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1751.60% $1,226,117

75 2091 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1821.66% $1,275,161

76 2092 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1894.53% $1,326,168

77 2093 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1970.31% $1,379,215

78 2094 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 2049.12% $1,434,383

79 2095 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 2131.08% $1,491,758

80 2096 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 2216.33% $1,551,429



Year

Total


DRAFT

No Build - Alternative 1

Bridge Construction

Roadway


R/W CEI (2)

Sub-Total

Operation

Costs

Routine


1 2017 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 100.00% $188,983

2 2018 $2,826,875 $2,826,875 $98,429 $90,554 $3,015,858 104.00% $3,136,492

3 2019 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 108.16% $204,404

4 2020 $28,268,751 $2,826,875 $31,095,626 $98,429 $90,554 $31,284,609 112.49% $35,190,931

5 2021 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 116.99% $221,083

6 2022 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 121.67% $229,927

7 2023 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 126.53% $239,124

8 2024 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 131.59% $248,689

9 2025 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 136.86% $258,636

10 2026 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 142.33% $268,982

11 2027 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 148.02% $279,741

12 2028 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 153.95% $290,931

13 2029 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 160.10% $302,568

14 2030 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 166.51% $314,671

15 2031 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 173.17% $327,257

16 2032 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 180.09% $340,348

17 2033 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 187.30% $353,962

18 2034 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 194.79% $368,120

19 2035 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 202.58% $382,845

20 2036 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 210.68% $398,159

21 2037 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 219.11% $414,085

22 2038 $5,059,373 $5,059,373 $98,429 $90,554 $5,248,356 227.88% $11,959,787

23 2039 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 236.99% $447,874

24 2040 $48,508,734 $2,085,000 $5,059,373 $55,653,107 $98,429 $90,554 $55,842,090 246.47% $137,634,868

25 2041 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 256.33% $391,574

26 2042 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 266.58% $407,237

27 2043 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 277.25% $423,526

28 2044 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 288.34% $440,467

29 2045 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 299.87% $458,086

30 2046 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 311.87% $476,410

31 2047 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 324.34% $495,466

32 2048 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 337.31% $515,285

33 2049 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 350.81% $535,896

34 2050 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 364.84% $557,332

35 2051 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 379.43% $579,625

36 2052 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 394.61% $602,810

37 2053 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 410.39% $626,922

38 2054 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 426.81% $651,999

39 2055 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 443.88% $678,079

40 2056 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 461.64% $705,203

41 2057 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 480.10% $733,411

42 2058 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 499.31% $762,747

43 2059 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 519.28% $793,257

44 2060 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 540.05% $824,987

45 2061 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 561.65% $857,987

46 2062 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 584.12% $892,306

47 2063 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 607.48% $927,998

48 2064 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 631.78% $965,118

49 2065 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 657.05% $1,003,723

50 2066 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 683.33% $1,166,392

51 2067 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 710.67% $1,213,048

52 2068 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 739.10% $1,261,569

53 2069 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 768.66% $1,312,032

54 2070 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 799.41% $1,364,514

55 2071 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 831.38% $1,419,094

56 2072 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 864.64% $1,475,858

57 2073 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 899.22% $1,534,892

58 2074 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 935.19% $1,596,288

59 2075 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 972.60% $1,660,139

60 2076 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1011.50% $1,726,545

61 2077 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1051.96% $1,795,607

62 2078 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1094.04% $1,867,431

63 2079 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1137.80% $1,942,128

64 2080 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1183.32% $2,019,813

65 2081 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1230.65% $2,100,606

66 2082 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1279.87% $2,184,630

67 2083 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1331.07% $2,272,015

68 2084 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1384.31% $2,362,896

69 2085 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1439.68% $2,457,412

70 2086 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1497.27% $2,555,708

71 2087 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1557.16% $2,657,937

72 2088 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1619.45% $2,764,254

73 2089 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1684.23% $2,874,824

74 2090 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1751.60% $2,989,817

75 2091 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1821.66% $3,436,028

76 2092 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1894.53% $3,573,469

77 2093 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1970.31% $3,716,408

78 2094 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2049.12% $3,865,064

79 2095 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2131.08% $4,019,666

80 2096 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2216.33% $4,180,453



Year

Total


DRAFT

No Build - Alternative 2

Bridge Construction

Roadway


R/W CEI (2)

Sub-Total

Operation

Costs

Routine


1 2017 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 100.00% $188,983

2 2018 $2,826,875 $2,826,875 $98,429 $90,554 $3,015,858 104.00% $3,136,492

3 2019 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 108.16% $204,404

4 2020 $28,268,751 $2,826,875 $31,095,626 $98,429 $90,554 $31,284,609 112.49% $35,190,931

5 2021 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 116.99% $221,083

6 2022 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 121.67% $229,927

7 2023 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 126.53% $239,124

8 2024 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 131.59% $248,689

9 2025 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 136.86% $258,636

10 2026 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 142.33% $268,982

11 2027 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 148.02% $279,741

12 2028 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 153.95% $290,931

13 2029 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 160.10% $302,568

14 2030 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 166.51% $314,671

15 2031 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 173.17% $327,257

16 2032 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 180.09% $340,348

17 2033 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 187.30% $353,962

18 2034 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 194.79% $368,120

19 2035 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 202.58% $382,845

20 2036 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 210.68% $398,159

21 2037 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 219.11% $414,085

22 2038 $5,045,473 $5,045,473 $98,429 $90,554 $5,234,456 227.88% $11,928,112

23 2039 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 236.99% $447,874

24 2040 $48,508,734 $1,946,000 $5,045,473 $55,500,207 $98,429 $90,554 $55,689,190 246.47% $137,258,013

25 2041 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 256.33% $391,574

26 2042 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 266.58% $407,237

27 2043 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 277.25% $423,526

28 2044 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 288.34% $440,467

29 2045 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 299.87% $458,086

30 2046 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 311.87% $476,410

31 2047 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 324.34% $495,466

32 2048 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 337.31% $515,285

33 2049 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 350.81% $535,896

34 2050 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 364.84% $557,332

35 2051 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 379.43% $579,625

36 2052 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 394.61% $602,810

37 2053 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 410.39% $626,922

38 2054 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 426.81% $651,999

39 2055 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 443.88% $678,079

40 2056 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 461.64% $705,203

41 2057 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 480.10% $733,411

42 2058 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 499.31% $762,747

43 2059 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 519.28% $793,257

44 2060 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 540.05% $824,987

45 2061 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 561.65% $857,987

46 2062 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 584.12% $892,306

47 2063 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 607.48% $927,998

48 2064 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 631.78% $965,118

49 2065 $0 $98,429 $54,332 $152,761 657.05% $1,003,723

50 2066 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 683.33% $1,166,392

51 2067 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 710.67% $1,213,048

52 2068 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 739.10% $1,261,569

53 2069 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 768.66% $1,312,032

54 2070 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 799.41% $1,364,514

55 2071 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 831.38% $1,419,094

56 2072 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 864.64% $1,475,858

57 2073 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 899.22% $1,534,892

58 2074 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 935.19% $1,596,288

59 2075 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 972.60% $1,660,139

60 2076 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1011.50% $1,726,545

61 2077 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1051.96% $1,795,607

62 2078 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1094.04% $1,867,431

63 2079 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1137.80% $1,942,128

64 2080 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1183.32% $2,019,813

65 2081 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1230.65% $2,100,606

66 2082 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1279.87% $2,184,630

67 2083 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1331.07% $2,272,015

68 2084 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1384.31% $2,362,896

69 2085 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1439.68% $2,457,412

70 2086 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1497.27% $2,555,708

71 2087 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1557.16% $2,657,937

72 2088 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1619.45% $2,764,254

73 2089 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1684.23% $2,874,824

74 2090 $0 $98,429 $72,262 $170,691 1751.60% $2,989,817

75 2091 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1821.66% $3,436,028

76 2092 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1894.53% $3,573,469

77 2093 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 1970.31% $3,716,408

78 2094 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2049.12% $3,865,064

79 2095 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2131.08% $4,019,666

80 2096 $0 $98,429 $90,192 $188,621 2216.33% $4,180,453



Year

Total


DRAFT

No Build - Fixed

Construction

& Mitigation Design (1)

R/W CEI (2)

Sub-Total

Operation

Costs

Routine


1 2017 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 100.00% $188,983

2 2018 $2,826,875 $2,826,875 $98,429 $90,554 $3,015,858 104.00% $3,136,492

3 2019 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 108.16% $204,404

4 2020 $28,268,751 $2,826,875 $31,095,626 $98,429 $90,554 $31,284,609 112.49% $35,190,931

5 2021 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 116.99% $221,083

6 2022 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 121.67% $229,927

7 2023 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 126.53% $239,124

8 2024 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 131.59% $248,689

9 2025 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 136.86% $258,636

10 2026 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 142.33% $268,982

11 2027 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 148.02% $279,741

12 2028 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 153.95% $290,931

13 2029 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 160.10% $302,568

14 2030 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 166.51% $314,671

15 2031 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 173.17% $327,257

16 2032 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 180.09% $340,348

17 2033 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 187.30% $353,962

18 2034 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 194.79% $368,120

19 2035 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 202.58% $382,845

20 2036 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 210.68% $398,159

21 2037 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 219.11% $414,085

22 2038 $4,012,105 $4,012,105 $98,429 $90,554 $4,201,088 227.88% $9,573,305

23 2039 $0 $98,429 $90,554 $188,983 236.99% $447,874

24 2040 $34,695,048 $5,426,000 $4,012,105 $44,133,153 $98,429 $90,554 $44,322,136 246.47% $109,241,457

25 2041 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 256.33% $83,307

26 2042 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 266.58% $86,640

27 2043 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 277.25% $90,105

28 2044 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 288.34% $93,709

29 2045 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 299.87% $97,458

30 2046 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 311.87% $101,356

31 2047 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 324.34% $105,410

32 2048 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 337.31% $109,627

33 2049 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 350.81% $114,012

34 2050 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 364.84% $118,572

35 2051 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 379.43% $123,315

36 2052 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 394.61% $128,248

37 2053 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 410.39% $133,378

38 2054 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 426.81% $138,713

39 2055 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 443.88% $144,261

40 2056 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 461.64% $150,032

41 2057 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 480.10% $156,033

42 2058 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 499.31% $162,274

43 2059 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 519.28% $168,765

44 2060 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 540.05% $175,516

45 2061 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 561.65% $182,537

46 2062 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 584.12% $189,838

47 2063 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 607.48% $197,432

48 2064 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 631.78% $205,329

49 2065 $0 $20,000 $12,500 $32,500 657.05% $213,542

50 2066 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 683.33% $307,501

51 2067 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 710.67% $319,801

52 2068 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 739.10% $332,593

53 2069 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 768.66% $345,896

54 2070 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 799.41% $359,732

55 2071 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 831.38% $374,122

56 2072 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 864.64% $389,087

57 2073 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 899.22% $404,650

58 2074 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 935.19% $420,836

59 2075 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 972.60% $437,669

60 2076 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1011.50% $455,176

61 2077 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1051.96% $473,383

62 2078 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1094.04% $492,319

63 2079 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1137.80% $512,011

64 2080 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1183.32% $532,492

65 2081 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1230.65% $553,791

66 2082 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1279.87% $575,943

67 2083 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1331.07% $598,981

68 2084 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1384.31% $622,940

69 2085 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1439.68% $647,858

70 2086 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1497.27% $673,772

71 2087 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1557.16% $700,723

72 2088 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1619.45% $728,752

73 2089 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1684.23% $757,902

74 2090 $0 $20,000 $25,000 $45,000 1751.60% $788,218

75 2091 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1821.66% $1,275,161

76 2092 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1894.53% $1,326,168

77 2093 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 1970.31% $1,379,215

78 2094 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 2049.12% $1,434,383

79 2095 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 2131.08% $1,491,758

80 2096 $0 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 2216.33% $1,551,429

$62,963,799 $8,252,875 $4,012,105 $6,838,980 $82,067,759 $3,482,296 $3,410,796 $88,960,851 $187,956,2451 Design fee equivalent to 10% of construction fee.


Year

Total


DRAFT

LRE - R3: Project Details by Sequence Report

https://www3.dot.state.fl.us/longrangeestimating/estimates/LREAESR04R3E.asp[12/5/2017 7:08:23 PM]

Date: 12/5/2017 7:08:02 PM

FDOT Long Range Estimating System - ProductionR3: Project Details by Sequence Report

Project: BCP___-1-22-01 Letting Date: 01/2099

Description: BCP Engineer's Estimate - Statewide Costs

District: 07 County: 99 DISTRICT/STATE WIDE Market Area: 99 Units: EnglishContract Class: Lump Sum Project: N Design/Build: N Project Length: 1.000 MI

Project Manager:

Version 1-P Project Grand Total $10,554,274.34Description: BCP Engineer's Estimate - Statewide Costs

Sequence: 1 NUU - New Construction, Undivided, Urban Net Length: 0.214 MI1,128 LF

Description: Alternative 1 Low-Level Drawbridge Gulf Side AlignmentSpecial Conditions:

Total Length = 0.52 mi (2,728.30) Roadway Length = 0.21 mi (1,128.30 ft) <- LRE LENGTH Bridge Length = 0.30 mi (1,600 ft)

EARTHWORK COMPONENT

User Input DataDescription ValueStandard Clearing and Grubbing Limits L/R 87.50 / 87.50 Incidental Clearing and Grubbing Area 0.00 Alignment Number 1 Distance 0.214 Top of Structural Course For Begin Section 101.00 Top of Structural Course For End Section 101.00 Horizontal Elevation For Begin Section 100.00 Horizontal Elevation For End Section 100.00 Front Slope L/R 6 to 1 / 6 to 1 Outside Shoulder Cross Slope L/R 2.00 % / 2.00 % Roadway Cross Slope L/R 2.00 % / 2.00 %

Pay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount110-1-1 CLEARING & GRUBBING 4.54 AC $20,881.20 $94,800.65120-6 EMBANKMENT 730.68 CY $17.41 $12,721.14 X-Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount120-6 EMBANKMENT 11,327.75 CY $17.41 $197,216.13 Earthwork Component Total $304,737.92

ROADWAY COMPONENT

DRAFT



User Input DataDescription ValueNumber of Lanes 3 Roadway Pavement Width L/R 20.50 / 20.50 Structural Spread Rate 275 Friction Course Spread Rate 165

Pay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount160-4 TYPE B STABILIZATION 5,784.40 SY $5.89 $34,070.12285-709 OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 09 5,137.79 SY $25.61 $131,578.80

334-1-13 SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONC, TRAFFIC C 706.45 TN $109.88 $77,624.73

337-7-83 ASPH CONC FC,TRAFFIC C,FC-12.5,PG 76-22 423.87 TN $133.47 $56,573.93

Turnouts/Crossovers SubcomponentDescription ValueAsphalt Adjustment 15.00 Stabilization Code Y Base Code Y Friction Course Code Y

Pay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount160-4 TYPE B STABILIZATION 867.66 SY $5.89 $5,110.52285-709 OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 09 770.67 SY $25.61 $19,736.86



Pavement Marking SubcomponentDescription ValueInclude Thermo/Tape/Other N Pavement Type Asphalt Solid Stripe No. of Paint Applications 2 Solid Stripe No. of Stripes 4 Skip Stripe No. of Paint Applications 2 Skip Stripe No. of Stripes 2

Pay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount

706-3 RETRO-REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS 115.00 EA $3.90 $448.50

710-11-101 PAINTED PAVT MARK,STD,WHITE,SOLID,6" 1.71 GM $976.84 $1,670.40

710-11-131 PAINTED PAVT MARK,STD,WHITE,SKIP, 6" 0.85 GM $388.64 $330.34

Peripherals Subcomponent

DRAFT



Description ValueOff Road Bike Path(s) 0 Off Road Bike Path Width L/R 0.00 / 10.00 Bike Path Structural Spread Rate 150 Noise Barrier Wall Length 0.00 Noise Barrier Wall Begin Height 0.00 Noise Barrier Wall End Height 0.00

Pay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount160-4 TYPE B STABILIZATION 1,754.37 SY $5.89 $10,333.24285-701 OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 01 1,253.12 SY $15.51 $19,435.89

334-1-11 SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONC, TRAFFIC A 93.98 TN $137.34 $12,907.21

Roadway Component Total $389,950.54

SHOULDER COMPONENT

User Input DataDescription ValueTotal Outside Shoulder Width L/R 13.25 / 7.25 Total Outside Shoulder Perf. Turf Width L/R 5.00 / 5.00 Sidewalk Width L/R 6.00 / 0.00

Pay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount520-2-4 CONCRETE CURB, TYPE D 1,127.81 LF $25.65 $28,928.33520-2-4 CONCRETE CURB, TYPE D 1,127.81 LF $25.65 $28,928.33

522-1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAYS, 4" 751.87 SY $44.28 $33,292.80

570-1-2 PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 1,253.12 SY $3.19 $3,997.45 Erosion ControlPay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount104-10-3 SEDIMENT BARRIER 2,255.62 LF $1.67 $3,766.89104-11 FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER 53.40 LF $9.78 $522.25

104-12 STAKED TURBIDITY BARRIER- NYL REINF PVC 53.40 LF $5.01 $267.53

104-15 SOIL TRACKING PREVENTION DEVICE 1.00 EA $2,530.68 $2,530.68

104-18 INLET PROTECTION SYSTEM 11.00 EA $101.36 $1,114.96107-1 LITTER REMOVAL 2.59 AC $37.52 $97.18107-2 MOWING 2.59 AC $60.79 $157.45 Shoulder Component Total $103,603.85

DRAINAGE COMPONENT

DRAFT



Pay ItemsPay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount

400-2-2 CONC CLASS II, ENDWALLS 3.84 CY $1,503.43 $5,773.17425-1-351 INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-5, <10' 8.00 EA $5,015.57 $40,124.56425-1-451 INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-5, <10' 3.00 EA $7,345.13 $22,035.39425-1-521 INLETS, DT BOT, TYPE C, <10' 2.00 EA $3,301.06 $6,602.12425-2-41 MANHOLES, P-7, <10' 2.00 EA $4,049.27 $8,098.54

430-175-124 PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND, 24"S/CD 504.00 LF $83.92 $42,295.68


430-175-148 PIPE CULV, OPT MATL, ROUND, 48"S/CD 1,072.00 LF $176.93 $189,668.96

570-1-1 PERFORMANCE TURF 64.93 SY $1.36 $88.30 Retention Basin 1Description ValueSize .5 AC Multiplier 1 Depth 1.00 Description

Pay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount110-1-1 CLEARING & GRUBBING 0.50 AC $20,881.20 $10,440.60120-1 REGULAR EXCAVATION 806.67 CY $13.39 $10,801.31400-2-2 CONC CLASS II, ENDWALLS 18.00 CY $1,503.43 $27,061.74425-1-541 INLETS, DT BOT, TYPE D, <10' 1.00 EA $3,960.64 $3,960.64425-2-71 MANHOLES, J-7, <10' 1.00 EA $6,249.52 $6,249.52



550-10-220 FENCING, TYPE B, 5.1-6.0', STANDARD 600.00 LF $12.13 $7,278.00

550-60-234 FENCE GATE,TYP B,SLIDE/CANT,18.1-20'OPEN 1.00 EA $2,123.91 $2,123.91

570-1-1 PERFORMANCE TURF 2,420.00 SY $1.36 $3,291.20 Retention Basin 2Description ValueSize .5 AC Multiplier 1 Depth 1.00 Description

Pay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount110-1-1 CLEARING & GRUBBING 0.50 AC $20,881.20 $10,440.60120-1 REGULAR EXCAVATION 806.67 CY $13.39 $10,801.31

DRAFT



400-2-2 CONC CLASS II, ENDWALLS 18.00 CY $1,503.43 $27,061.74425-1-541 INLETS, DT BOT, TYPE D, <10' 1.00 EA $3,960.64 $3,960.64425-2-71 MANHOLES, J-7, <10' 1.00 EA $6,249.52 $6,249.52





570-1-1 PERFORMANCE TURF 2,420.00 SY $1.36 $3,291.20 Drainage Component Total $575,884.72

SIGNING COMPONENT


700-1-11 SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I GM, <12 SF 5.00 AS $330.75 $1,653.75

700-1-12 SINGLE POST SIGN, F&I GM, 12-20 SF 1.00 AS $1,086.69 $1,086.69

700-2-15 MULTI- POST SIGN, F&I GM, 51-100 SF 1.00 AS $5,961.21 $5,961.21

Signing Component Total $8,701.65

LIGHTING COMPONENT

Conventional Lighting SubcomponentDescription ValueSpacing MAX Pay Items


630-2-11 CONDUIT, F& I, OPEN TRENCH 1,127.81 LF $7.27 $8,199.18

630-2-12 CONDUIT, F& I, DIRECTIONAL BORE 147.17 LF $18.82 $2,769.74

635-2-11 PULL & SPLICE BOX, F&I, 13" x 24" 5.00 EA $634.91 $3,174.55

715-1-13 LIGHTING CONDUCTORS, F&I, INSUL, NO.4-2 3,824.94 LF $2.16 $8,261.87

715-4-13 LIGHT POLE COMPLETE, F&I- STD, 40' 5.00 EA $5,580.05 $27,900.25

715-500-1 POLE CABLE DIST SYS, CONVENTIONAL 5.00 EA $576.34 $2,881.70

Subcomponent Total $53,187.29

Lighting Component Total $53,187.29

DRAFT



Sequence 1 Total $1,436,065.97

DRAFT




Description: Alternative 2 Low-Level Drawbridge Bay Side AlignmentSpecial Conditions:

Total Length = 0.50 mi (2,620.19 ft) Roadway Length = 0.19 mi (1,020.19 ft) <- LRE LENGTH Bridge Length = 0.30 mi (1,600 ft)

EARTHWORK COMPONENT

User Input DataDescription ValueStandard Clearing and Grubbing Limits L/R 87.50 / 87.50 Incidental Clearing and Grubbing Area 0.00

Alignment Number 1 Distance 0.193 Top of Structural Course For Begin Section 101.00 Top of Structural Course For End Section 101.00 Horizontal Elevation For Begin Section 100.00 Horizontal Elevation For End Section 100.00 Front Slope L/R 6 to 1 / 6 to 1 Outside Shoulder Cross Slope L/R 2.00 % / 2.00 % Roadway Cross Slope L/R 2.00 % / 2.00 %


110-1-1 CLEARING & GRUBBING 4.09 AC $20,881.20 $85,404.11120-6 EMBANKMENT 658.98 CY $17.41 $11,472.84

X-ItemsPay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount

120-6 EMBANKMENT 11,327.75 CY $17.41 $197,216.13

Earthwork Component Total $294,093.08

ROADWAY COMPONENTUser Input DataDescription ValueNumber of Lanes 3 Roadway Pavement Width L/R 20.50 / 20.50 Structural Spread Rate 275 Friction Course Spread Rate 165


160-4 TYPE B STABILIZATION 5,231.96 SY $5.89 $30,816.24285-709 OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 09 4,647.10 SY $25.61 $119,012.23



DRAFT





160-4 TYPE B STABILIZATION 941.75 SY $5.89 $5,546.91285-709 OPTIONAL BASE,BASE GROUP 09 836.48 SY $25.61 $21,422.25








Peripherals SubcomponentDescription ValueOff Road Bike Path(s) 0 Off Road Bike Path Width L/R 0.00 / 10.00 Bike Path Structural Spread Rate 150 Noise Barrier Wall Length 0.00 Noise Barrier Wall Begin Height 0.00 Noise Barrier Wall End Height 0.00





DRAFT



SHOULDER COMPONENTUser Input DataDescription ValueTotal Outside Shoulder Width L/R 13.25 / 7.25 Total Outside Shoulder Perf. Turf Width L/R 5.00 / 5.00 Sidewalk Width L/R 6.00 / 0.00


520-2-4 CONCRETE CURB, TYPE D 1,020.10 LF $25.65 $26,165.56520-2-4 CONCRETE CURB, TYPE D 1,020.10 LF $25.65 $26,165.56

522-1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAYS, 4" 680.06 SY $44.28 $30,113.06

570-1-2 PERFORMANCE TURF, SOD 1,133.44 SY $3.19 $3,615.67

Erosion ControlPay Items




104-18 INLET PROTECTION SYSTEM 10.00 EA $101.36 $1,013.60107-1 LITTER REMOVAL 2.34 AC $37.52 $87.80107-2 MOWING 2.34 AC $60.79 $142.25

Shoulder Component Total $93,955.67

DRAINAGE COMPONENTPay Items

Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount400-2-2 CONC CLASS II, ENDWALLS 3.48 CY $1,503.43 $5,231.94425-1-351 INLETS, CURB, TYPE P-5, <10' 7.00 EA $5,015.57 $35,108.99425-1-451 INLETS, CURB, TYPE J-5, <10' 2.00 EA $7,345.13 $14,690.26425-1-521 INLETS, DT BOT, TYPE C, <10' 1.00 EA $3,301.06 $3,301.06425-2-41 MANHOLES, P-7, <10' 1.00 EA $4,049.27 $4,049.27




570-1-1 PERFORMANCE TURF 58.73 SY $1.36 $79.87

Retention Basin 1

DRAFT



Description ValueSize .5 AC Multiplier 1 Depth 1.00 Description


110-1-1 CLEARING & GRUBBING 0.50 AC $20,881.20 $10,440.60120-1 REGULAR EXCAVATION 806.67 CY $13.39 $10,801.31400-2-2 CONC CLASS II, ENDWALLS 18.00 CY $1,503.43 $27,061.74425-1-541 INLETS, DT BOT, TYPE D, <10' 1.00 EA $3,960.64 $3,960.64425-2-71 MANHOLES, J-7, <10' 1.00 EA $6,249.52 $6,249.52





570-1-1 PERFORMANCE TURF 2,420.00 SY $1.36 $3,291.20

Retention Basin 2Description ValueSize .5 AC Multiplier 1 Depth 1.00 Description








Drainage Component Total $531,559.23

SIGNING COMPONENT

DRAFT








LIGHTING COMPONENTConventional Lighting SubcomponentDescription ValueSpacing MAX Pay Items










Sequence 2 Total $1,340,178.65DRAFT




Description: Alternative 3 High-Level Fixed Bridge Gulf Side AlignmentSpecial Conditions:


EARTHWORK COMPONENT




110-1-1 CLEARING & GRUBBING 7.30 AC $20,881.20 $152,432.76120-6 EMBANKMENT 1,174.55 CY $17.41 $20,448.92


120-6 EMBANKMENT 15,866.83 CY $17.41 $276,241.51





334-1-13 SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONC, TRAFFIC C 1,138.05 TN $109.88 $125,048.93


DRAFT


















DRAFT






522-1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAYS, 4" 1,211.23 SY $44.28 $53,633.26














Retention Basin 1

DRAFT




















SIGNING COMPONENT

DRAFT




Description: Alternative 4 High-Level Fixed Bridge Bay Side AlignmentSpecial Conditions:


EARTHWORK COMPONENT






120-6 EMBANKMENT 15,866.83 CY $17.41 $276,241.51







DRAFT


















DRAFT




















Retention Basin 1

DRAFT




















SIGNING COMPONENT

DRAFT




Description: High-Level Fixed Bridge Frontage RoadsSpecial Conditions: Total Length = 0.38 mi (2,031.43 ft) <- LRE LENGTH

EARTHWORK COMPONENT











Turnouts/Crossovers SubcomponentDescription ValueAsphalt Adjustment 15.00 Stabilization Code Y

DRAFT



Base Code Y Friction Course Code Y















SHOULDER COMPONENTUser Input Data

DRAFT



Description ValueTotal Outside Shoulder Width L/R 13.25 / 7.25 Total Outside Shoulder Perf. Turf Width L/R 5.00 / 5.00 Sidewalk Width L/R 6.00 / 0.00


















SIGNING COMPONENTPay Items

DRAFT



Date: 12/5/2017 7:08:02 PM

FDOT Long Range Estimating System - ProductionR3: Project Details by Sequence Report

Project: BCP___-1-22-01 Letting Date: 01/2099

Description: BCP Engineer's Estimate - Statewide Costs

District: 07 County: 99 DISTRICT/STATE WIDE Market Area: 99 Units: EnglishContract Class: Lump Sum Project: N Design/Build: N Project Length: 1.000 MI

Project Manager:

Version 1-P Project Grand Total $10,554,274.34Description: BCP Engineer's Estimate - Statewide Costs

Project Sequences Subtotal $8,636,178.98

102-1 Maintenance of Traffic 10.00 % $863,617.90101-1 Mobilization 10.00 % $949,979.69

Project Sequences Total $10,449,776.57

Project Unknowns 0.00 % $0.00Design/Build 0.00 % $0.00

Non-Bid Components:Pay item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount

999-25 INITIAL CONTINGENCY AMOUNT (DO NOT BID) LS $104,497.77 $104,497.77

Project Non-Bid Subtotal $104,497.77

Version 1-P Project Grand Total $10,554,274.34DRAFT

alternatives analysis memorandum florida department …

Documents