alternative proteins...protein with a protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (pdcaas) of...
TRANSCRIPT
Alternative PROTEINS
eHANDBOOK
TABLE OF CONTENTSComparing Plant-Based Proteins 4
PDCAAS, functionality, sustainability are among the variables driving applications.
High Protein Snacks: Beyond the Protein Bar 11
AD INDEXPLT Health Solutions • www.PLT.com 3
IDF • www.IDF.com 10
eHANDBOOK: Alternative Proteins 2
www.FoodProcessing.com
PLANT PROTEIN
Contact PLT Health Solutions for samples and more information.+1.973.984.0900 ext. 214 • www.PLTHealth.com
A PRODUCT OF:
VISIT US AT IFT19 • STAND 1525
Artesa® Chickpea Protein Advantages3 Excellent organoleptic profile3 Easier to formulate3 “White” color3 Small, uniform particle size3 Good oil & water binding3 Good foaming & emulsifying properties3 High protein loading potential3 Leaner, cleaner labels3 Non-GMO, non-allergenic3 Sustainable, low environmental impact
Artesa Chickpea Protein is a highly nutritious plant protein concentrate that canmatch dairy proteins for taste, texture, mouthfeel and formulation functionality.With Artesa, you can deliver higher levels of protein in consumer-pleasing productswith easier, faster processing, leaner, cleaner labels and unleashed creativity.
From the way it looks, smells and acts when it arrives in your facility – to how consumers react to it in finished products, Artesa Chickpea Protein has been engineered to deliver an incredible sensory experience for consumers in protein-fortified products.
Artesa addresses a number of formulating issues that you have run into workingwith plant proteins before. Because of the way that it is made, you can achievehigher protein loading with fewer production problems, faster processing and less waste. Our goal is to help you match gold standard products in every one ofyour applications.
THE GREAT,NEW TASTEOF PLANTPROTEIN
It’s time to change the way you think about plant protein.
Touted as a top trend for 2019 by a
number of market research firms
and food & beverage organizations,
plant-based proteins continue to gain
momentum in the U.S., with many large
corporations making significant invest-
ments in this realm.
Ingredion (www.ingredion.com), Westches-
ter, Ill., for one, announced in December
2018 it is investing a combined $140 mil-
lion to further position the company as
a supplier of a broad range of plant pro-
tein solutions.
University-based food science
researchers also are focusing
more on plant proteins. In
late November, the new Plant
Protein Innovation Center
(PPIC) (ppic.cfans.umn.edu)
at the University of Minnesota
in St. Paul held its inaugural
meeting. PPIC will take an
interdisciplinary approach,
bringing together food and agricultural
scientists from industry, academia and the
public sphere as well as other stakeholders
“to produce and study nutritious and func-
tional plant protein ingredients for food
applications,” as a brochure on PPIC’s web-
site explains.
“There has been quite an increase in
demand for plant protein from consumers,
who are seeking alternatives to meat for
many reasons,” notes B. Pam Ismail, PPIC’s
director and an associate professor of food
science and nutrition at the
Comparing Plant-Based ProteinsPDCAAS, functionality and sustainability are among the variables driving applications.
Aquafaba, the viscous water
in which chickpeas have been
cooked, mimics many of the
functional properties of egg
whites, so it can be used as a
replacement for products such as
mayonnaise. Sir Kensington’s is
now a Unilever brand.
eHANDBOOK: Alternative Proteins 4
www.FoodProcessing.com
University of Minnesota. “Consumers are
seeking protein sources that have health
and environmental benefits, such as reduc-
ing greenhouse gases and improving land
management.” Ismail’s goal is for PPIC to
become an international research center.
Although soy has been the leading plant-
based protein for decades — a complete
protein with a Protein Digestibility Corrected
Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) of .99 (1.0
being the highest) — the clean label move-
ment has shifted attention to other plant
protein sources due to concern that soy-
beans are often genetically modified. Soy is
also among the “Big 8” allergens in the U.S.
While pea protein is the main alternative
to soy at present, other pulse proteins are
gaining ground, such as chick-
peas, fava beans and lentils.
Additional popular plant pro-
tein sources include nut flours,
especially almond flour; cereal
grain proteins such as oats and
teff; pseudocereal grains like
amaranth and the ever-popular
complete protein quinoa; and
seeds such as chia and flaxseed.
SOY AS A TEMPLATE Benefiting from years of
research and production,
“Soy protein is the most
functional plant protein in
the market,” Ismail says.
Not only is it a complete protein, soy is
also very versatile and efficient, used in
everything from Silk milk to Tofurkey.
“When soy protein was first introduced in
the market, it had a stronger flavor,” Ismail
notes. “But over the years, processing tech-
nologies have been developed to ensure
that soy is bland-tasting and, therefore,
more adaptable.” PPIC aims to leverage
what the industry has learned from soy and
apply this knowledge and experience to
other plant protein sources.
“With soy, we know, ‘here is a product
that works,’ ” agrees M.J. Kinney, a Minne-
apolis-based food scientist with the Good
Food Institute (www.gfi.org), Washington,
D.C. “We understand its functionality to a
greater extent than any other plant
protein out there. So, soy can be
a template for plant proteins to
come.”
PULSES — RISING STARS Considered to be clean
label and allergen-free, pea
protein’s star continues to
rise. Compared to soy, pea
protein has a lower PDCAAS
Campbell Soup’s Bolthouse
Farms brand mixes both soy
and almond proteins for this
plant-protein beverage.
www.FoodProcessing.com
eHANDBOOK: Alternative Proteins 5
of approximately .82. What’s more, in a
typical pea protein isolate, roughly 80
percent of the of ingredient is protein,
compared to approximately 90 percent
for soy isolates, according to Kinney.
To attain 10g of complete protein in a
product, just over 15g of pea protein iso-
late would be needed, she explains, noting
that she arrived at that number by dividing
10 by .80 (protein percentage) and then by
.82 (PDCAAS).
One challenge with pea protein and other
new plant proteins is the early dominance
of certain manufacturers that develop pro-
prietary formulations, Kinney observes.
“There is a lack of a standard for process-
ing,” she says, noting that collaborative
industry research needs to be done to
more fully understand the manufacturing
processes that affect a plant protein’s func-
tional properties.
Minneapolis-based Puris (purisfoods.com),
for example, makes three pea protein
isolates derived from organic, non–geneti-
cally modified peas grown in the U.S., each
suitable for different applications.
One isolate the company says has high
functionality and excellent dispersibility and
mouthfeel is recommended for protein pow-
ders, dry beverage blends, ready-to-drink
products, meat alternatives, vegan spreads
and emulsified products. Another isolate,
designed for applications where low viscos-
ity and low water-hold are required, is more
appropriate for nutrition bars, acidic bever-
ages and low-pH products. The third isolate,
which has a neutral pH and great extrusion
properties, according to Puris, is well-suited
for cereals, crisps, protein bars and high-in-
clusion ready-to-drink protein beverages.
Puris also claims to be the only grower
of non-GMO and organic peas in the
U.S. market.
Kinney points out that food & beverage
processors that source pea protein from
Puris would not be able to source identical
“With soy, we know, ‘here is a product that works.’ We understand its functionality to a greater extent than any other plant protein
out there. So, soy can be a template for plant proteins to come.”
www.FoodProcessing.com
eHANDBOOK: Alternative Proteins 6
isolates from another ingredient supplier.
This limitation of supply is preventing
plant-based proteins from achieving even
stronger market growth, she says.
When assessing whether a plant protein
ingredient would be the right fit for a
particular application, Kinney says food
processors need to consider three key char-
acteristics of functionality:
• Can it hold water?
• Can it form a gel?
• Is it water-soluble?
“If the protein isolate has a low water-hold
and it doesn’t form a gel, it might be ideal for
a beverage, which we would want to have
minimum mouthfeel,” Kinney explains. “You
don’t want it to be a thick sludge. But if you
want to put the isolate into a plant-based
meat application, you do want that strong
gelation and you do want it to hold water.”
Beyond pea, other pulse proteins have
seized the attention of consumers and
the food industry. Ingredion recently
entered into a joint venture agreement with
Canadian firm Verdient Foods (www.ver-
dientfoodsinc.com) to make pulse-based
protein concentrates and flours from lentils
and fava beans, as well as peas.
“The pulses are rich in protein and fiber,
relatively low in fat, and are low-glyce-
mic-index foods that contain various
micronutrients and bioactive substances
(for example, phytochemicals) for health
and well-being,” says Jing Zhou a business
scientist with Ingredion.
The company’s pulse-based flours, con-
centrates and isolates can be used in many
applications. “While we continue to see a
lot of growth within snack and pasta appli-
cations, there has been a lot of interest in
pulse proteins for emerging application
areas like meat and dairy alternatives,”
points out Karen Constanza, project leader
for technical development at Ingredion.
Ingredient manufacturers can blend pulses
with other proteins to offset nutrient defi-
cits. “Pulse proteins are generally rich in
lysine but lack in sulfur-containing amino
acids,” Zhou explains. “On the other hand,
cereal proteins are usually abundant in
sulfur-containing amino acids but lack in
lysine. Therefore, strategically combining
Beyond pea, other pulse proteins have seized the attention of consumers and the food industry.
www.FoodProcessing.com
eHANDBOOK: Alternative Proteins 7
pulse and cereal proteins can help provide a
higher protein quality than either alone.”
Vanessa Brovelli, product development
manager for Quincy, Mass.-based Bay State
Milling (www.baystatemilling.com), concurs
that combining pulses with grains allows for
optimal plant protein solutions. By combin-
ing the two, “the PDCAAS of the blend gets
closer to the gold standard of 1,” she says.
GRAINS, SEEDS AND NUTS Supplying a wide variety of grains, flours
and seeds for baked goods, bars and
breakfast cereals, Bay State Milling touts
the protein content, traceability and
sustainability of its non–GMO Project
Verified, certified-organic SowNaked oats.
“Our SowNaked oat is a special variety, grown
hulless (naked) with naturally higher protein
that can be used in several applications like
bars, oatmeal and oat milk to provide a plant-
based protein boost,” Brovelli says.
Among seeds, flax and chia contribute
omega fatty acids and functional gelling
properties as well as protein, she adds.
Sesame, pumpkin and sunflower seeds also
provide a protein boost while contributing a
nutty rich flavor and serving as a fat source.
Tree nuts constitute another critical plant
protein source. With 6g of protein per
ounce, almonds are the tree nut highest in
protein, according to the Almond Board of
California (www.almonds.com). Although
widely used in European confections such
as macarons and marzipans, almond flour is
only beginning to command some attention
in the U.S. as a way to add more protein
to desserts, baked goods, energy bars and
other food products.
Interestingly, as the recent (December
2018) Farm Bill removed hemp from the
Controlled Substances Act, it now can be
used as a protein source in food. Derived
from the hemp seed, hemp protein contains
30 percent fat and 25 percent protein, with
most of the oil composed of polyunsatu-
rated fatty acids. According to the Hemp
Industries Assn., hemp seeds are high in
essential fatty acids, B vitamins and fiber.
Among seeds, flax and chia contribute omega fatty acids and functional gelling properties as
well as protein.
www.FoodProcessing.com
eHANDBOOK: Alternative Proteins 8
The FDA in December said it had “no ques-
tions” about the Generally Recognized As
Safe (GRAS) status of hemp seeds, oil and
protein powder in response to a petition
from Fresh Hemp Foods.
FORMULATION CAVEATS When blending different plant
proteins or substituting higher-
protein for lower-protein flours, care
must be taken, Brovelli cautions.
“When replacing a portion of wheat, corn
or rice flour with higher-protein grains,
seeds or pulse flours, water absorption
may need to be adjusted and a func-
tional ingredient could be required in
an application such as bread, where the
gluten network may be disrupted by these
ingredients,” she explains. “Pulse flours
are known to require additional water for
full hydration and functionality. Seeds
such as pumpkin can add excess fat to a
formulation, so other fats may have to be
reduced.”
Flavor, of course, is also a major consid-
eration. Among the pulses, lentils and
chickpeas have milder sensory profiles,
Brovelli says. As she observes, “the flavor
of grains and seeds is sometimes easier to
incorporate into the overall sensory profile
of a bar or snack versus the beany note that
is common with pulses.”
“The flavor of grains and seeds is sometimes easier to incorporate into the overall sensory
profile of a bar or snack versus the beany note that is common with pulses.”
www.FoodProcessing.com
eHANDBOOK: Alternative Proteins 9
FORTIFY WITH
NEW HYDROLYZED
BROTH PROTEIN ISOLATE POWDER
FINALLY: A natural protein powder that
meets allergen-free, clean label, paleo, and keto requirements, and is also low in sodium
compared to other protein isolate powders.
New CHiKPRO® is a chicken broth protein
powder that delivers the benefits of a
complete protein to support development,
as well as collagen.
Dairy-free | Soy-free | Gluten-free | Hormone-free
Ketogenic and paleo diet-friendly
Made in the USA, from chicken raised on American farms
CHiKPRO® has solutionsfor manufacture and use in FDA, USDA, and dietary supplements.
LEARN MORE AT IDF.COM | (800) 641-6509©2019 International Dehydrated Foods, Inc. (IDF). All rights reserved.
Protein is on the mind of more and
more consumers who view snacks as
both a treat and a healthful choice.
Research from Mintel shows that 94% of
U.S. adults snack at least once daily and half
(50%) snack two or three times per day. As
snacking becomes more of an ingrained part
of the American diet, it will be increasingly
important for snacks to deliver nutrition ben-
efits, including high-quality protein.
According to Nielsen, over half (55%) of
U.S. households agree that “high protein”
is important to keep in mind when decid-
ing on food purchases. Additionally, there
are more than five million Americans fol-
lowing a high-protein diet. That’s a full six
percent of all U.S. households with some-
one trying to achieve high intake targets
for protein.
Fortunately, recent innovations have opened
the door to delivering ample servings of
complete proteins, as well as other attrac-
tive health benefits, in a myriad of snack
applications. This development has food
manufacturers looking beyond just bars and
shakes to deliver high-protein snacks.
DEMAND FOR HEALTHY SNACKS IS DRIVING GROWTH IN SNACKING CATEGORY According to a 2018 Food Insight study,
a majority of consumers (69%) said they
sometimes snack at least twice daily. The
snacking business grew globally in 2017,
according to Nielsen, and healthy snacks
are driving this growth. Separately, a
report from Hexa Research expects sales
of healthy snacks in the U.S. to reach
$5.3 billion by 2025 on rising demand
from younger market segments.
While conventional snacking slightly
declined in recent years, the $17 billion
health and wellness snacking category has
increased, according a 2018 Mintel report.
This may be due to changing patterns in the
American diet.
According to the 13th Annual Food and
Health Survey by the International Food
Information Council (IFIC) Foundation, more
than one-third of Americans followed a spe-
cific eating pattern or diet in the past year.
Restricted carbohydrate and intermittent
fasting were among the top diet patterns
High-Protein Snacks: Beyond the Protein BarBy IDF
eHANDBOOK: Alternative Proteins 11
www.FoodProcessing.com
mentioned in the survey. This trend could
drive consumers to seek more high-protein
food sources, including snacks.
U.S. SENIORS BENEFIT FROM MORE PROTEIN THROUGHOUT THE DAY Individuals seeking to increase the
amount of high-quality protein they
take in throughout the day may turn
to snacks to get additional servings
of the macronutrient. Studies suggest
that ingesting protein in even amounts
throughout the day may result in better
physical performance and overall
satiety, which may, in turn, promote
a generally more healthful diet. This
may affect seniors, in particular, and
motivate them to get a healthy serving
of protein at and between meals.
Recent research suggests that older adults
who evenly distribute intake of a total of
75 g to 90 g of protein throughout the
day may reduce or delay age-related sar-
copenia (loss of muscle mass). However,
the research also suggests that this mus-
cle-building response is reduced at lower
protein intake levels throughout the day,
all the more reason for older consumers to
reach for a serving of high-protein chips,
crisps, or even cookies.
In fact, according to Nielsen, Americans aged
65 and over are among the most well-in-
formed demographic groups regarding
the protein content of high-protein foods.
Perhaps surprisingly, millennials (age 18-36)
ranked above even their older counterparts
in their knowledge of high-protein sources.
When it comes to shopping behavior, fami-
lies with children ages six to 18 years old and
senior couples are the most likely to consider
protein as a “must have” or “good to have”
item in their cart. These data suggest that
consumers across a diverse range of age
groups are learning about protein’s benefits
and making purchase decisions based on
that knowledge.
MANY U.S. CHILDREN NOT EATING ENOUGH PROTEIN FOODS 2015 data from the Centers for Disease
Control & Prevention (CDC) suggest that
many U.S. children are not receiving the
number of recommended daily servings
of protein foods. Just over 20% of boys
and nearly 25% of girls ages one to
three years in the U.S. did not meet the
recommended daily intake of protein
foods. Furthermore, nearly 40% of boys
and girls ages four to eight years did not
meet their recommended intake per day.
Perhaps the most concerning trend is with
older children, especially teenage girls. The
CDC estimates that over half of boys and
over 60% of girls ages nine to 13 years did not
meet the recommended servings of protein.
Download the complete white paper here.
www.FoodProcessing.com
eHANDBOOK: Alternative Proteins 12