alphabet soup: cdm, vra, cco, mets, mods, rdf - why metadata matters
DESCRIPTION
This presentation given to University of Iowa Libraries on Nov. 17, 2014, discussing 1) the alphabet soup of metadata standards, e.g. CDM, VRA, CCO, METS, MODS, RDF, including sample tagging and their applications for digital libraries, and 2) why metadata matters. It does not address metadata issues and tools for metadata creation, extraction, transformation, quality control, syndication and ingest.TRANSCRIPT
Alphabet Soup: CDM, VRA, CCO, METS, MODS, RDF – Why Metadata Matters
Amanda Xu
Candidate for Metadata Analyst at Iowa University Libraries
What is CDM (1)
• CDM = OCLC CONTENTdm Digital Collection Management Software
• CONTENTdm 6.8 was released on June 16, 2014 with improvements to Website configuration tool, XML sitemaps, and expanded range of available image download sizes
• CDM collection metadata fields compatible to qualified Dublin Core, VRA, OAI-PMH, etc.
• 125 fields per collection• 128,000 characters per field• Initiatives in 1) leveraging linked data in WorldCat via
WorldCat Digital Collection Gateway or 2) transforming CONTENTdm metadata into linked open data
What is CDM (2)
SOURCE: Ingram, G. (2014, August). OCLC CONTENTdm and the WorldCat Digital Collection Gateway. Available: http://www.contentdm.org/USC/training/CONTENTdm-DCG-Overview-20140812.pdf
Sample CDM Metadata Field Properties
SOURCE: Best Practices for CONTENTdm and other OAI-PMH Compliant Repositories; Creating Shareable Metadata (version 3.1)
Sample CDM OAI-PMH Record Using Qualified Dublin Core from Iowa Digital Library (1)
related collections
Sample CDM OAI-PMH Record Using Qualified Dublin Core from Iowa Digital Library (2)
SOURCE: Univ. of Iowa Libraries. Digital Research and Publishing (2014). Metadata extracted from OAI feed of records for materials in the Iowa Digital LibraryAvailable: http://www.lib.uiowa.edu/drp/technology/
sound
Sample CDM Compound Object Record Display from Iowa Digital Library (1)
SOURCE: Iowa Digital Library. Oral history interview with Dora Martin Berry, August 14, 1997 [excepts]Available: http://digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm/ref/collection/aawiowa/id/2102
Audio player
Sample CDM Compound Object Record Display from Iowa Digital Library (2)
SOURCE: Iowa Digital Library. Oral history interview with Dora Martin Berry, August 14, 1997 [excepts]Available: http://digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm/ref/collection/aawiowa/id/2102
Sound
Sample CDM Compound Object Record Display from Iowa Digital Library (3)
SOURCE: Iowa Digital Library. Oral history interview with Dora Martin Berry, August 14, 1997 [excepts]Available: http://digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cdm/ref/collection/aawiowa/id/2102
Page not found
Sample CDM Compound Object Record Display from Libraries’ Smart Search (1)
SOURCE: University of Iowa Libraries Smart Search. Available: http://smartsearch.uiowa.edu/
Page not found
Sample CDM Compound Object Record Display from Libraries’ Smart Search (2)
Regroup related collections into one field
Sample CDM Compound Object Record Display from Libraries’ Smart Search (3)
Refine search result by genre type “sound”
Initiatives in leveraging linked data in WorldCatvia WorldCat Digital Collection Gateway
SOURCE: Sarason, C. (2014, May). CONTENTdm update. CONTENTdm Users Group Meeting at University of South Carolina. Available: http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=cdmusers
Initiative in Transforming CONTENTdm Metadata into Linked Open Data
SOURCE: Lampert, C.K. & Southwick, S.B. (2013). Transforming CONTENTdm metadata into linked open data.CONTENTdm Virtual Conference, December 5, 2013.Available: http://www.contentdm.org/USC/training/2013/Lampert-Southwick-20131205.pdf
What is VRA Core
• “A data standard for the description of works of visual culture as well as the images that document them”
• Developed and maintained by the VRA Core Oversight Committee
• Current version VRA 4.0 in compliance to XML schema, released 4/9/2007
• VRA Core implementation from ARTstor
• In 2013, Linked Data in VRA 4.0 project converting VRA xml records into RDF/XML was completed by Jeff Mixter as his master thesis submitted to the College of Communication and Information of Kent State
Changes to Elements Between VRA 3.0 and 4.0
SOURCE: VRA Core 4.0 introduction. Available: http://www.loc.gov/standards/vracore/VRA_Core4_Intro.pdf
Outline of VRA Core 4.0 Elements
SOURCE: Eklund, J. “Got metadata?” VRA Core XML SEI 2007. Available: http://core.vraweb.org/pdfs/core4_xml.pdf
VRA Core 4.0 XML Schema
• “A schema is simply an XML file that contains the rules for what can and cannot reside in an XML data file.”
• “Specifying the valid elements, sub-elements, and attributes as well as the values they can contain (either by data type or by providing a list of values)”
• “Specifying which elements are required and/or are repeatable”• “Controlling the structure by specifying which elements can be nested”• Having two versions of the VRA Core 4.0 schema: unrestricted imposing no
restrictions on the values entered, and restricted imposing restrictions on the data values entered into the type attributes
• Enabling the export of information from relational or proprietary database to XML for the purposes of sharing that data beyond local system
SOURCE: VRA Core 4.0 introduction. Available: http://www.loc.gov/standards/vracore/VRA_Core4_Intro.pdf
Screenshot of VRA Core 4.0 Restricted Schema Type Values
SOURCE: http://www.loc.gov/standards/vracore/VRA_Core4_Restricted_schema_type_values.pdf
VRA Core 4.0 Example from http://aal.ucsd.edu/vracore4/example001.html (1)
VRA Core 4.0 Example from http://aal.ucsd.edu/vracore4/example001.html (2)
VRA Core 4.0 Example from http://aal.ucsd.edu/vracore4/example001.xml (3)
Work
Image
VRA Core 4.0 Example from http://aal.ucsd.edu/vracore4/example001.xml (4)
VRA Core 4.0 Example from http://aal.ucsd.edu/vracore4/example001.xml (5)
VRA Core 4.0 Example from http://aal.ucsd.edu/vracore4/example001.xml (6)
VRA Core Implementation from ARTstor (1)
SOURCE: ARTstor Digital Library. Available: http://www.artstor.org/index.shtml
VRA Core Implementation from ARTstor (2)
SOURCE: ARTstor Digital Library. Available: http://www.artstor.org/index.shtml
Create image group in user preferred work folder
Screenshot of Linked Data in VRA Core 4.0 Project
SOURCE: Mixter, J. (2013). Linked data in VRA Core 4.0: Converting VRA XML records into RDF/XML. Available: http://jmixter.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/thesis/
What is CCO (1)
• CCO = Cataloging Cultural Objects: A Guide to Describing Cultural Works and Their Images for Cultural Heritage Community, including Museums, Libraries, Image Collections and Archives
• Provides a set of cataloging rules and syntax conventions surrounding various elements from CDWA (Categories for Description of Works of Art) (which contains elements and rules) and VRA Core (which contains elements); it is more directly analogous to AACR and DACS (Describing Archives: A Content Standard)
• Promotes cataloging best practice for creating sharable metadata, building common practice, complementing diverse data structure, and improving discovery and access of cultural works
• Sponsored by the Visual Resources Association Foundation• Published by the American Library Association (ALA) in June 2006
What is CCO (2)
SOURCE: CCO Commons. Available from http://cco.vrafoundation.org/index.php/toolkit/cco_pdf_version/
VRA Core 4.0 and CCO
SOURCE: VRA Core 4.0 introduction. Available: http://www.loc.gov/standards/vracore/VRA_Core4_Intro.pdf
A Sample CCO Record from CCO Commons
SOURCE: CCO Commons. Category examples: 4 paintings.http://cco.vrafoundation.org/index.php/toolkit/index_of_examples/category_examples_4_paintings/example_1_predella_panel_named_artist
Screenshot of Metadata Standards Crosswalk from Getty Research Institute
SOURCE: Getty Research Institute (2009). Metadata standards crosswalk. Available:
http://www.getty.edu/research/publications/electronic_publications/intrometadata/crosswalks.html
What is METS
• METS = Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard• Provides a standardized XML format for transmission of complex
digital library objects between systems by representing their hierarchical structure, the names and locations of the files that comprise those objects, and the associated metadata in XML
• Current version 1.10, adding International Council of Museums’ LIDO (Lightweight Information Describing Objects) to MDTYPE enumeration
• In discussion of METS 2.0 data model compatible to Semantic Web and other technologies
• Maintained by METS Editorial Board, committed to maintaining editorial control over METS, its XML Schema, METS Profile XML Schema, and official METS documentation
• Hosted by Library of Congress, and developed as an initiative of the Digital Library Federation
Seven Major Sections of a METS Document
SOURCE: Bredenberg, K. (2011, June). METS. Communicating Archival Metadataconference and workshops in Stockholm 28 - 30 June 2011
<metsHdr>
<dmdSec>
<amdSec>
<fileSec>
<structMap>
<structLink>
<behaviorSec>
<mets>
mets Header
descriptive metadata Section
administrative metadata Section
file Section
structural Map section
structural Link section
behavior Section
<mets> METS root element
• Establishes the container for the information being stored and /or transmitted by the standard
• Has optional attributes: ID, OBJID, Label, Type, Profile
<METS> Example from HathitrustGoogle Book Mets.xml
<METS:metsxmlns:METS="http://www.loc.gov/METS/"xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"xmlns:gbs="http://books.google.com/gbs"xmlns:PREMIS="info:lc/xmlns/premis-v2"xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/
http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd info:lc/xmlns/premis-v2 http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis.xsd
OBJID="UOM_39015000024524"PROFILE="gbs">
SOURCE: HathiTrust Google METS Examplehttp://www.hathitrust.org/documents/example-source-google-mets.xml
<metsHdr>
• Captures metadata about the METS document itself• <agent>provides for various parties and their roles with respect to
the METS record to be documented• <name>record s full name of document agent• <note>records any additional information regarding the agent's
activities with respect to the METS document• ROLE (string/R) specifies the function of the agent with respect to
the METS document• TYPE(string/O) specifies the type of AGENT, e.g. individual or
organization• <altRecordID>uses alternative record identifier values for the digital
object represented by the METS document• <metsDocumentID>a unique identifier for the METS document
itself
<metsHdr> Example from Hathitrust Google Book Mets.xml
<METS:metsHdr ID="UOM_39015000024524" CREATEDATE="2010-07-07T05:46:24" RECORDSTATUS="NEW">
<METS:agent ROLE="CREATOR" TYPE="ORGANIZATION">
<METS:name>Google</METS:name>
</METS:agent>
</METS:metsHdr>
<dmdSec>
• Records descriptive metadata pertaining to the METS object as a whole or one of its components
• A descriptive metadata element can either wrap the metadata (mdWrap) or reference it in an external location (mdRef) or both
• Descriptive metadata can be expressed according to many current description standards (i.e., MARC, MODS, Dublin Core, TEI Header, EAD, VRA, FGDC, DDI) or a locally produced XML schema
<dmdSec> Example from Hathitrust Google Book Mets.xml (1)
<METS:dmdSec xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" ID="DMDMARC">
<METS:mdWrap MIMETYPE="text/xml" MDTYPE="MARC" LABEL="Source MARC record">
<METS:xmlData><record>…</record>
</METS:xmlData></METS:mdWrap>
</METS:dmdSec>
<dmdSec> Example from Hathitrust Google Book Mets.xml (2)
SOURCE: http://www.hathitrust.org/documents/example-source-google-mets.xml
<amdSec>
• Contains the administrative metadata pertaining to the digital object, its components and any original source material from which the digital object is derived
• Separated into four sub-sections that accommodate technical metadata (techMD), intellectual property rights (rightsMD), analog/digital source metadata (sourceMD), and digital provenance metadata (digiprovMD)
• Each of these subsections can either wrap the metadata (mdWrap) or reference it in an external location (mdRef) or both
<amdSec> Example from Hathitrust Google Book Mets.xml
<METS:amdSec><METS:techMD ID="TMD1">
<METS:mdWrap LABEL="production notes" MDTYPE="OTHER" OTHERMDTYPE="Google Production Notes"><METS:xmlData>
<gbs:productionNotes><gbs:badPages>3.05</gbs:badPages><gbs:missingPages>0.00</gbs:missingPages><gbs:tightBoundPages>0.46</gbs:tightBoundPages>
</gbs:productionNotes></METS:xmlData>
</METS:mdWrap></METS:techMD>
…
<techMD> Example from Hathitrust Google Book Mets.xml
<METS:techMD ID="TABLE_OF_CONTENTS">
<METS:mdWrap LABEL="page tags" MDTYPE="OTHER" OTHERMDTYPE="Google">
<METS:xmlData>
<gbs:pageTag>TABLE_OF_CONTENTS</gbs:pageTag>
</METS:xmlData>
</METS:mdWrap>
</METS:techMD>
<sourceMD> Example from Hathitrust Google Book Mets.xml
<METS:sourceMD ID="S1">
<METS:mdWrap MDTYPE="OTHER" OTHERMDTYPE="Google" LABEL="DESCMDRecord_Source_Library"><METS:xmlData><gbs:sourceLibrary>UOM</gbs:sourceLibrary>
<gbs:sourceIdentifier>39015000024524</gbs:sourceIdentifier></METS:xmlData>
</METS:mdWrap></METS:sourceMD>
<digiprovMD> Example from Hathitrust Google Book Mets.xml (1)
<METS:digiprovMD xmlns="info:lc/xmlns/premis-v2" ID="PREMIS1"><METS:mdWrap MDTYPE="PREMIS">
<METS:xmlData><PREMIS:premis version="2.0"><PREMIS:object xsi:type="representation">
<PREMIS:objectIdentifier><PREMIS:objectIdentifierType>barcode</PREMIS:objectIdentifierType><PREMIS:objectIdentifierValue>UOM_39015000024524</PREMIS:objectIdentifierValue>
</PREMIS:objectIdentifier><PREMIS:significantProperties>
<PREMIS:significantPropertiesType>file count</PREMIS:significantPropertiesType><PREMIS:significantPropertiesValue>526</PREMIS:significantPropertiesValue>
</PREMIS:significantProperties><PREMIS:significantProperties>
<PREMIS:significantPropertiesType>page count</PREMIS:significantPropertiesType><PREMIS:significantPropertiesValue>262</PREMIS:significantPropertiesValue>
</PREMIS:significantProperties></PREMIS:object>
<digiprovMD> Example from Hathitrust Google Book Mets.xml (2)
… <PREMIS:agent>
<PREMIS:agentIdentifier><PREMIS:agentIdentifierType>LCNAF</PREMIS:agentIdentifierType>
<PREMIS:agentIdentifierValue>Google (Firm)</PREMIS:agentIdentifierValue>
</PREMIS:agentIdentifier><PREMIS:agentType>organization</PREMIS:agentType>
</PREMIS:agent></PREMIS:premis>
</METS:xmlData></METS:mdWrap>
</METS:digiprovMD></METS:amdSec>
<fileSec>
• Provides an inventory of and the location for the content files that comprise the digital object being described in the METS document
• <fileGrp> grouping the digital files compromising the content of a METS object either into a flat file arrangement or into a nested arrangement
<fileSec> Example from HathitrustGoogle Book Mets.xml
<METS:fileSec><METS:fileGrp ID="FG1" USE="image">
<METS:file ID="IMG00000001" MIMETYPE="image/jp2" SEQ="00000001" CREATED="2008-03-27T00:00:00" SIZE="251854"CHECKSUM="0da406ad7d1957a4d544648bf504f518" CHECKSUMTYPE="MD5" OWNERID="13510798888116402-5">
<METS:FLocat xlink:href="00000001.jp2" LOCTYPE="OTHER" OTHERLOCTYPE="SYSTEM"/></METS:file> …</METS:fileGrp>
</METS:fileSec>
<structMap>
• Provides a means for organizing the digital content represented by the <file> elements in the <fileSec> of the METS document into a coherent hierarchical structure
• Facilitates users’ understanding of structural relationship of the content files or parts of the content files
• Encoded as a tree of nested <div>, and child file pointer <fptr>
• Provides a means for linking content at any hierarchical level with relative descriptive and administrative metadata
<structMap> Example from HathitrustGoogle Book Mets.xml
<METS:structMap ID="SM1" TYPE="physical"><METS:div TYPE="volume" ADMID="TMD1 PD1 S1">
<METS:div TYPE="page" ORDER="1" ADMID="FRONT_COVER IMAGE_ON_PAGE IMPLICIT_PAGE_NUMBER">
<METS:fptr FILEID="IMG00000001"/><METS:fptr FILEID="TXT00000001"/>
</METS:div>…<METS:div TYPE="page" ORDER="262" ORDERLABEL="258" ADMID="BACK_COVER
IMAGE_ON_PAGE IMPLICIT_PAGE_NUMBER"><METS:fptr FILEID="IMG00000262"/><METS:fptr FILEID="TXT00000262"/>
</METS:div></METS:div>
</METS:structMap></METS:mets>
<structLink>
• Allows for the specification of hyperlinks between the different components of a METS structure that are delineated in a structural map
• <smLink> indicating two a hyperlink between two nodes in the structural map
<behaviorSec>
• Provides a means to link digital content with applications or computer programming code that can be used in conjunction with other info in the METS doc to render or display the digital object or transform one or more of its component content files
• Associates executable behaviors with content in the METS document by means of a repeatable behavior <behavior> element
• <interfaceDef> represents an abstract definition of the set of behaviors represented by a particular behavior section
• <mechanism> points to a module of executable code that implements and runs the behavior defined by the interface definition
Screenshot of Sample HathitrustGoogle Book Mets.xml
SOURCE: http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001225921
Importance of METS
• Provides the means to specify metadata necessary for both management of digital objects within a repository and the exchange of such objects between repositories (or between repositories and their users)
• Allows the sharing of efforts to develop information management tools/services and facilitates the interoperable exchange of digital materials among institutions (including vendors)
• Used in the role of Submission Info Package (SIP), Archival Info Package (AIP) or Dissemination Info Package (DIP) within Open Archival Info System (OAIS) Reference Model
SOURCE: METS Primer, available: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets-schemadocs.html
What is MODS
• MODS = Metadata Object Description Schema• Is an XML schema for a bibliographic element set that may be used for a variety of
purposes, and particularly for library applications• Includes a subset of MARC fields and uses language-based tags rather than numeric
ones• Regroups elements from MARC 21 bibliographic format• Current version MODS 3.5 Schema, released July 8, 2013• MARC 21 to MODS 3.5 mapping, revised October 2014• MODS XSLT 1.0 Stylesheets for 1) MARCXML to MODS 3.5; 2) MOD 3.5 to DC updated in
August 2014• Maintained by the MODS Editorial Committee with support from the Network
Development and MARC Standards Office of the LC• MODS RDF Ontology in draft stage
SOURCES: 1. MODS: Uses and Features. Available: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-overview.html2. MODS: Conversions. Available: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-conversions.html2. MODS RDF Ontology. Available: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/modsrdf/
Changes for MODS 3.5
• Add attribute @unit to <physicalDescription><extent>
• Add rfc5646 as value for <language><languageTerm>
• Add @altFormat and @contentType attributes to <titleInfo>, <abstract>, <tableOfContents> and <accessCondition> (Approved 2012-09-17)
• Add @eventType to <originInfo> to indicate production, publication, distribution, manufacture
• Add @typeURI to <identifier>, <note>, and <physicalDescripton>/<note>
• Add @generator to <classification>
• Add <etal> element, a subelement of <name>
• Add @otherType to <titleInfo> element
SOURCE: Changes for MODS 3.5. Available: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/changes-3-5.html
MODS Elements
SOURCE: Outline of elements and attributes in MODS version 3.5. Available:http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-outline-3-5.html
MODS TitleInfo Element, SubElements, and Attributes (1)
SOURCE: Outline of elements and attributes in MODS version 3.5. Available:http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-outline-3-5.html
MODS Name Element, SubElements, and Attributes (2)
SOURCE: Outline of elements and attributes in MODS version 3.5. Available:http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-outline-3-5.html
MODS RelatedItem Element, SubElements, Attributes (3)
SOURCE: Outline of elements and attributes in MODS version 3.5. Available:http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-outline-3-5.html
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (1)
SOURCE: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/mets.xml
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (2)
SOURCE: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/mets.xml
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (3)
SOURCE:http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/mets.xml
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (4)
SOURCE: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/mets.xml
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (5)
SOURCE: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/mets.xml
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (6)
SOURCE: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/mets.xml
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (7)
SOURCE: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/mets.xml
Master & Service
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (8)
SOURCE: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/mets.xml
Master & Service
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (9)
SOURCE: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/default.html
Screenshot of “Library of Congress march” using MODS and METS (10)
SOURCE: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010802/default.html
Importance of MODS (1)
• Used as an SRU (Search/Retrieval via URL) specified format, e.g. MODS 3.3
• Used as an extension schema to METS
• Represents metadata for harvesting
• Provides resource description in XML syntax
• Represents a simplified MARC record in XML
• Bundles metadata in xml with an electronic resources
• Supports discovery and management of resources, and access to them, as well as exchange and management of encoded descriptions
Importance of MODS (2)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Rich Compatible User-oriented Simple
MODS
DC
ONIX
MARC
What is RDF• RDF = Resource Description Framework• A standard model for data interchange on the Web through RDF statement in
subject-predicate-object triples, including international resource identifiers (IRIs), or literals, blank nodes, multiple graphs
• Provides linking through IRIs by setting RDF links between datasets to enable the discovery of additional data and to support the integration of data from multiple sources
• Provides semantic info about resources through RDF vocabularies often defined by RDF schema, e.g. FOAF, Dublin Core, Schema.org, SKOS
• Serialized in various formats, e.g. Turtle, JSON-LD, RDFa, RDF/XML • Allows systems to make logical inferences by defining a model-theory semantics
for RDF graphs, the RDF, and RDFS vocabularies, e.g. {ex:allen foaf:knows ex:mary.}(foaf:knows rdfs:domain foaf:person .} ->{ex:allen rdf:type foaf:person .}
• Allows datasets to be published and interlinked on the Web using RDF, e.g. linked data, queried and manipulated through SPARQL
• Current version RDF 1.1, published in 2014• Acceptance by libraries, museums and cultural heritage communities for open
linked data initiatives
Importance of RDF• Adds machine-readable information to web pages using, e.g.
schema.org vocabulary, enabling them to be displayed in an enhanced format on search engines or to be processed automatically by third-party applications
• Enriches a dataset by linking it to third-party datasets• Interlinks API feeds, making sure that clients can easily discover
how to access more information• Uses the datasets currently published as linked data, and builds
aggregations of data around specific topics• Builds distributed social networks by interlinking RDF descriptions
of people across multiple web sites• Provides a standards-compliant way for exchanging data between
databases• Interlinks various datasets within an organization, enabling cross-
dataset queries to be performed using SPARQLSOURCE: 1. W3C RDF 1.1 Primer, W3C Working Group note 24 June 2014. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/ 2. Schmachtenberg, M., Bizer, C., & Paulheim, H. (2014). Adoption of the Linked Data best practices in different topic domains. 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2014) –RDB
Track. Available: http://linkeddatacatalog.dws.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/state/#toc8
Sample RDF 1.1 XML Syntax (1)
Sample RDF 1.1 XML Syntax (2)
Screenshot of LC Linked Data Service (1)
SOURCE: http://id.loc.gov/
Screenshot of LC Linked Data Service (2)
SOURCE: LCNAF. Available: http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79041626.html
Screenshot of LC Linked Data Service (3)
Screenshot of LC Linked Data Service (4)
SOURCE: LC Bib Resources. Available: http://id.loc.gov/resources/bibs/634533
Screenshot of BIBFRAME.org (1)
SOURCE: LC BIBFRAME. Available: http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/
Screenshot of BIBFRAME.org (2)
SOURCE: Available: http://bibframe.org/tools/compare/bibid/634533
Screenshot of WorldCat Linked Data Explorer (1)
SOURCE: Gandi, an autobiography story of my experiments with truth.Available: http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/1151002411
Screenshot of WorldCat Linked Data Explorer (2)
SOURCE: Gandi, an autobiography story of my experiments with truth.Available: http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/1151002411
Screenshot of VIAF (1)
SOURCE: VIAF. Available: http://viaf.org/viaf/14817771/
Screenshot of VIAF (2)
SOURCE: VIAF. Available: http://viaf.org/viaf/14817771/
Screenshot of VIAF (3)
SOURCE: VIAF. Available: http://viaf.org/viaf/14817771/
Screenshot of VIAF (4)
SOURCE: http://viaf.org/viaf/71391324/rdf.xml
Screenshot of FAST Linked Data
SOURCE: Available: http://experimental.worldcat.org/fast/1354198/
Acceptance by Libraries, Museums and Cultural Heritage Communities for Open Linked Data Initiatives
SOURCE: Crawlable linked datasets as of April 2014. Available: http://linkeddatacatalog.dws.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/state/LODCloudDiagram.html
Why Metadata Matters
• Markup different types of digital resources by applying content description rules and administration best practices, controlled vocabularies, metadata standards, e.g. Qualified Dublin Core, VRA Core 4.0, CCO, METS, MODS, RDF, etc.
• Supports intended users, including end users who search and discover the resources, and stakeholders who develop and manage the resources
• Supports intended uses, e.g. searching, browsing, navigating, discovering, consuming, publishing, accessing, citing, linking, repurposing, interchanging, sharing, archiving, preserving, managing, right management, securing, reporting and analysis, accessibility, etc.
• Indicates how resources get used, e.g. usage analysis by metadata fields• Enables systems capabilities, e.g. out of box metadata generation and
capture• Enables integration, analysis, and enhancement of digital resources
despite of systems, disciplines, data types, formats, file sizes, granularity, etc.
SOURCE: Xu, A. (2014, Feb.) Role of Cataloger in the 21st Century Academic Library. Available: http://www.slideshare.net/elephantsmith/interview-presentation-roleofcataloger21stcenturyacademiclibrary