allogeneic anti-bcma car t cells show tumour …...results to our knowledge, this is the first study...

1
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Specific cell lysis (%) E/T ratio REH-BCMA/UT cells REH-BCMA cells/BCMA-CART REH cells/BCMA CART REH cells/ UT cells MM #16 / BCMA CART MM #16 / UT cells Figure 2 – (A) Schematic diagram illustrating whole BM biopsy processing before the CTL assay. (B) Gating strategy to identify viable MM cells within the bulk BM biopsy by FACS. MM cells can be distinguished from normal plasma cells and other BM microenvironmental cells based on CD138 + CD38 + CD45 - CD19 - CD56 + profile. (C) Specific MM killing (%) assessed at the end of the 4 hour CTL assay by FACS (using the MM gating strategy described above). anti-BCMA CAR T cells are co-cultured with REH-BCMA (a BCMA positive control cell line), REH (a BCMA negative control cell line) and the processed MM biopsy using different E/T ratios. Untransduced T cells (UT) were used to measure background T cell killing. (D) Specific anti-BCMA CAR T cell killing (%) against different MM BM samples (14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 23, 27, 32 and 33) at 10:1 E/T ratio. The percentage was quantified as: (% MM cell death with BCMA-CAR T cell - % MM cell death with UT cell) / % spontaneous MM cell death. REH and REH-BCMA were used as negative and positive controls. MM 32 MM 33 MM 41 MM 42 Figure 3 – (A) List of MM BM samples used to test the activity of the allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cell product, including different patient characteristics: patient age, genomic subgroup, disease stage and prior lines of treatment. (B) BCMA levels of all the MM primary samples tested in the CTL assay, measured by FACS. FMO was used as negative control (in yellow). Two MM primary samples were negative for BCMA (shown in red), while seven MM primary samples were positive for BCMA, with a range of expression as shown in the histograms. (C) Correlation between relative BCMA levels and specific MM killing by anti-BCMA CAR T cells. Relative BCMA levels were measured by FACS and normalized as described: BCMA levels (MFI) in MM cells – BCMA levels (MFI) in endogenous BM T cells (used as an internal negative control in the BM sample). Autologous anti-BCMA CAR T cells have been successfully used in clinical trials for the treatment of relapsed refractory Multiple Myeloma (rrMM), achieving high initial response rates (>80%). However, these therapeutic responses are not durable with patients relapsing on average after 12-18 months 1,2 . Poor T cell fitness, CAR T cell exhaustion, the immunosuppressive effect of the tumour microenvironment and BCMA negative tumour escape are some of the factors contributing to treatment failure. In this study we describe for the first time the activity of an allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cell product derived from young healthy donors (HD) against primary MM cells using patient bone marrow (BM) biopsies. In addition, we compare the performance of HD and MM patient-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells. 1 Raje N et al. NEJM 2019; 380(18):1726-1737 ; 2 Zhao WH et al. J Hematol Oncol. 2018; 11(1):141. Allogeneic anti - BCMA CAR T Cells Show Tumour Specific Killing Against Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells from Different Genomic Sub - Groups Ana M. Metelo 1 , Ieuan Walker 2 , Agnieszka Jozwik 1 , Charlotte Graham 1,2 , Charlotte Attwood 1,2 , Katy Sanchez 2 , Alan Dunlop 2 , Kirsty Cuthill 2 , Carmel Rice 2 , Matthew Streetly 3 , Trevor Bentley 4 , Bijan Boldajipour 5 , Cesar Sommer 4 , Barbra Sasu 4 and Reuben Benjamin 1,2 1 King's College London, London, United Kingdom; 2 King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; 3 Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; 4 Allogene Therapeutics Inc., South San Francisco, CA; 5 Pfizer Inc., South San Francisco, CA INTRODUCTION CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS RESULTS To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells are therapeutically active against primary MM cells, in a clinically relevant model that includes the BM microenvironment; HD-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells were shown to have distinct phenotypic and functional characteristics compared to rrMM-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells; This work lends further support to the development of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial for the treatment of rrMM patients using this allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy. 1. Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells become strongly activated upon exposure to MM primary cells. 4. Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells from young healthy donors show higher CD4/CD8 ratio and reduced dysfunctionality compared to MM-derived CAR T cells. 2. Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells efficiently target primary MM cells within the BM niche. Figure 1 – (A) Schematic representation of the second generation anti-BCMA CAR construct with 4-1BB and CD3z intracellular domains. (B) Representative dot plot showing the percentage of anti-BCMA CAR + T cells present in the allogeneic product, measured at Day 14 by FACS using an anti-idiotype Ab. (C) BCMA levels of MM cell lines (U266 and H929) and MM primary cells from different MM patients (MM32, MM33, MM41 and MM42) measured by FACS. FMO was used as control. (D) Representative images of CD25 expression on anti-BCMA CAR T cells after 24h of co-culture with the MM cell line U266 and isolated CD138 + MM primary cells (measured by FACS). CD25 is a known T cell activation marker. (E) Table summarizing the different BCMA levels of the MM cell lines and MM primary cells, the activation achieved by the anti-BCMA CAR T cells (CD25 + ) after exposure to the MM cells for 24h at 1:1 E/T ratio, IFN-g and TNF-a secretion and MM cell killing. BCMA levels, percentage of CD25 + CAR T cells and MM killing were measured by FACS. IFN-g and TNF-a secretion (pg/mL) was detected in the supernatant by Luminex FLEXMAP 3D. MM primary cells were isolated from the BM using a CD138 + selection kit. Figure 4 – (A) List of MM patients used to generate MM-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells from peripheral blood samples: early MM group (n=6) refers to patients at diagnosis or up to two prior lines of treatment, rrMM group (n=4) refers to patients with 3 or more prior lines of treatment (eligible for anti-BCMA CAR T cell clinical trials). Healthy donor-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells were also generated from healthy male volunteers (HD), age <30 (n=6). Patient ID, patient age, disease progression stage and treatment regimens are shown for each MM patient. (B) Comparison of T cell counts (per 10.000 PBMCs) from HD PBMCs versus early MM and rrMM PBMCs (at baseline Day 0). (C) Memory phenotype of CD4 and CD8 T cells from the different groups, measured by FACS, using CD45 RO and CD62L to quantify: naïve, central memory (CM), effector memory (EF) and effector (EFF) T cells. (D) CD4/CD8 ratio of anti-BCMA CAR T cells derived from the different groups (at Day 14) measured by FACS. (E) Representative dot plot showing permanently dysfunctional T cells, characterized by CD38 + CD101 + , in HD-derived versus MM-derived CAR T cells. (F) Quantification of CD38 + CD101 + and TIGIT + T cells on HD-derived versus MM-derived CAR T cells (n=4). (G) Levels of the CD25 activation marker on UT, HD-derived CARTs and MM-derived CARTs (n=3), measured by FACS, after co-culture with U266 MM cells for 7 days. Data represent mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, paired, 2-tailed t test. 3. Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells efficiently kill MM primary cells irrespective of genomic subgroup and independent of BCMA expression. A ACKNOWLEDGMENTS King’s College Hospital Clinical Team 0 2000 4000 6000 HD Early MM rrMM T cell counts (per 10.000 cells) HD Early MM rrMM PB sample Age Disease progression Treatment regimen MM 14 64 4th relapse VTD, Melphalan Autograft, CD, RD, VD, Dara MM 26 71 3rd relapse CTD, Melphalan Autograft, BTD, VCD MM 29 57 4th relapse PAD, Melphalan Auto, KCD, CRD, Melphalan, Auto#2, Dara MM 36 61 3rd relapse CTD, Melphalan, Auto#2 * * HD-derived BCMA-CAR T cells MM-derived BCMA-CAR T cells 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 CD4/CD8 ratio A anti-BCMA scFv Off- switch Hinge 4-1BB CD3ζ E A B A B C C F D BCMA-CAR T only BCMA-CAR T + U266 BCMA-CAR T + CD138 + MM BCMA-CAR expression C MM cell lines MM primary samples FMO U266 H929 BM biopsy BM processing RBC lysis Quantify MM cells CTL assay 4 hours MM panel staining / FACS analysis D BM sample Patient age Genomic subgroup Disease Stage Treatment regimens #14 64 - 2 VTD, Melphalan Auto, Len, Dara #15 73 FGFR3 gain, 16q23 (4p) loss (std risk) 1 Newly diagnosed, Nil #16 88 - 2 Newly diagnosed, Nil #20 62 - Normal PCs - #21 79 p53 del (high risk) 2 VMP, DVD #23 81 Normal (std risk) 1 Newly Diagnosed, Nil #27 64 p53 del, 1q+, 1p del (high risk) 2 Carfilzomib/Cyclo/Dex #32 89 IgH rearrangement (but not 4,14 or 11,14) (std risk) IgGk MGUS 8% PCs - #33 57 Normal (std risk) 1 VTD, Melphalan Auto C PB sample Age Disease progression Treatment regimen MM 24 70 newly diagnosed Nil MM 37 79 newly diagnosed Nil MM 18 68 2nd relapse VCD, RVD MM 25 58 2nd relapse CTD, VCD MM 30 69 1st relapse VTD, Melphalan Autograft MM 38 39 1st relapse Car/Cyclo/Dex B D * * * ** E Dysfunctional T cells HD-derived CARTs MM-derived CARTs G HD-CART MM-CART B 0 25 50 HD-derived CART MM-derived CART TIGIT + cells (%) 0 25 50 HD-derived CART MM-derived CART CD38 + CD101 + cells (%) CD38 + CD101 + Early MM group rrMM group KCL Haemato-Oncology Tissue Bank Team Patients and families No BCMA expression BCMA expression Samples MM14 FMO MM15 MM16 MM21 MM27 MM32 MM33 Samples MM20 FMO MM23 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 UT CART HD CART MM CD25 levels ( MFI) -20 0 20 40 60 80 REH-BCMA REH 14 15 16 20 21 23 27 32 33 Specific BCMA-CAR T cell killing (%) MM samples Financial relationships to disclose: Research Funding or Employment: Allogene Therapeutics – AMM, TB, CS, BS, RB Pfizer – AMM, BB, RB Servier – AJ, GH, RB Honoraria, Consultancy or Conference Support: Gilead – GH, RB Janseen – KC Takeda - KC, RB Amgen – KC, RB Novartis – RB Eusapharm - RB 0 20 40 60 80 100 Naïve CM EM EFF CD4 T cells (%) HD early MM rrMM 0 20 40 60 80 100 Naïve CM EM EFF CD8 T cells (%) MM cell lines and CD138 + primary MM cells (24h co-culture) CAR Ts + U266 + H929 + MM 32 + MM 33 + MM 41 + MM 42 BCMA levels (MFI) - 2289 5598 291 1184 858 2235 CD25 + T cells (%) 5.3% 73.6% 64.2% 16.7% 55.5% 53.3% 51.4% IFN-g (pg/mL) 22.7 4980.9 1025.0 686.0 595.0 N/A N/A TNF-a (pg/mL) 5.9 616.3 74.4 157.2 65.6 N/A N/A 10:1 5:1 2.5:1 1:1 Samples Samples

Upload: others

Post on 11-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T Cells Show Tumour …...RESULTS To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells are therapeutically active against

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Spe

cifi

c ce

ll ly

sis

(%)

E/T ratio

REH-BCMA/UT cells

REH-BCMA cells/BCMA-CART

REH cells/BCMA CART

REH cells/ UT cells

MM #16 / BCMA CART

MM #16 / UT cells

Figure 2 – (A) Schematic diagram illustrating whole BM biopsy processing before the CTL assay. (B) Gating strategy to identify viable MM cells

within the bulk BM biopsy by FACS. MM cells can be distinguished from normal plasma cells and other BM microenvironmental cells based onCD138+CD38+CD45-CD19-CD56+ profile. (C) Specific MM killing (%) assessed at the end of the 4 hour CTL assay by FACS (using the MM gating strategydescribed above). anti-BCMA CAR T cells are co-cultured with REH-BCMA (a BCMA positive control cell line), REH (a BCMA negative control cell line) andthe processed MM biopsy using different E/T ratios. Untransduced T cells (UT) were used to measure background T cell killing. (D) Specific anti-BCMACAR T cell killing (%) against different MM BM samples (14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 23, 27, 32 and 33) at 10:1 E/T ratio. The percentage was quantified as: (% MMcell death with BCMA-CAR T cell - % MM cell death with UT cell) / % spontaneous MM cell death. REH and REH-BCMA were used as negative andpositive controls.

MM 32MM 33MM 41MM 42

Figure 3 – (A) List of MM BM samples used to test the activity of the allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cell product, including different patient

characteristics: patient age, genomic subgroup, disease stage and prior lines of treatment. (B) BCMA levels of all the MM primary samples tested inthe CTL assay, measured by FACS. FMO was used as negative control (in yellow). Two MM primary samples were negative for BCMA (shown in red),while seven MM primary samples were positive for BCMA, with a range of expression as shown in the histograms. (C) Correlation between relativeBCMA levels and specific MM killing by anti-BCMA CAR T cells. Relative BCMA levels were measured by FACS and normalized as described: BCMAlevels (MFI) in MM cells – BCMA levels (MFI) in endogenous BM T cells (used as an internal negative control in the BM sample).

Autologous anti-BCMA CAR T cells have been successfully used in clinical trials for the treatment of relapsed refractory Multiple Myeloma (rrMM), achieving high initial response rates (>80%). However, these therapeutic responses arenot durable with patients relapsing on average after 12-18 months1,2. Poor T cell fitness, CAR T cell exhaustion, the immunosuppressive effect of the tumour microenvironment and BCMA negative tumour escape are some of the factorscontributing to treatment failure. In this study we describe for the first time the activity of an allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cell product derived from young healthy donors (HD) against primary MM cells using patient bone marrow (BM)

biopsies. In addition, we compare the performance of HD and MM patient-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells. 1 Raje N et al. NEJM 2019; 380(18):1726-1737 ; 2 Zhao WH et al. J Hematol Oncol. 2018; 11(1):141.

Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T Cells Show Tumour Specific Killing

Against Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells from Different Genomic Sub-Groups

Ana M. Metelo 1, Ieuan Walker 2, Agnieszka Jozwik 1, Charlotte Graham 1,2, Charlotte Attwood 1,2, Katy Sanchez 2, Alan Dunlop 2, Kirsty Cuthill 2, Carmel Rice 2,

Matthew Streetly 3, Trevor Bentley 4, Bijan Boldajipour 5, Cesar Sommer 4, Barbra Sasu 4 and Reuben Benjamin 1,2

1King's College London, London, United Kingdom; 2King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; 3Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; 4Allogene Therapeutics Inc., South

San Francisco, CA; 5Pfizer Inc., South San Francisco, CA

INTRODUCTION

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

RESULTS

➢ To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells are therapeuticallyactive against primary MM cells, in a clinically relevant model that includes the BM microenvironment;

➢ HD-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells were shown to have distinct phenotypic and functional characteristicscompared to rrMM-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells;➢ This work lends further support to the development of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial for thetreatment of rrMM patients using this allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy.

1. Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells become strongly activated upon exposure to MM primary cells.

4. Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells from young healthy donors show higher CD4/CD8 ratio and reduced dysfunctionality compared to MM-derived CAR T cells.

2. Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells efficiently target primary MM cells within the BM niche.

Figure 1 – (A) Schematic representation of the second generation anti-BCMA CAR construct with 4-1BB and CD3z intracellular domains. (B)

Representative dot plot showing the percentage of anti-BCMA CAR+ T cells present in the allogeneic product, measured at Day 14 by FACS using ananti-idiotype Ab. (C) BCMA levels of MM cell lines (U266 and H929) and MM primary cells from different MM patients (MM32, MM33, MM41 andMM42) measured by FACS. FMO was used as control. (D) Representative images of CD25 expression on anti-BCMA CAR T cells after 24h of co-culturewith the MM cell line U266 and isolated CD138+ MM primary cells (measured by FACS). CD25 is a known T cell activation marker. (E) Tablesummarizing the different BCMA levels of the MM cell lines and MM primary cells, the activation achieved by the anti-BCMA CAR T cells (CD25+) afterexposure to the MM cells for 24h at 1:1 E/T ratio, IFN-g and TNF-a secretion and MM cell killing. BCMA levels, percentage of CD25+ CAR T cells andMM killing were measured by FACS. IFN-g and TNF-a secretion (pg/mL) was detected in the supernatant by Luminex FLEXMAP 3D. MM primary cellswere isolated from the BM using a CD138+ selection kit.

Figure 4 – (A) List of MM patients used to generate MM-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells from peripheral blood samples: early MM group (n=6)

refers to patients at diagnosis or up to two prior lines of treatment, rrMM group (n=4) refers to patients with 3 or more prior lines of treatment (eligiblefor anti-BCMA CAR T cell clinical trials). Healthy donor-derived anti-BCMA CAR T cells were also generated from healthy male volunteers (HD), age <30(n=6). Patient ID, patient age, disease progression stage and treatment regimens are shown for each MM patient. (B) Comparison of T cell counts (per10.000 PBMCs) from HD PBMCs versus early MM and rrMM PBMCs (at baseline Day 0). (C) Memory phenotype of CD4 and CD8 T cells from thedifferent groups, measured by FACS, using CD45RO and CD62L to quantify: naïve, central memory (CM), effector memory (EF) and effector (EFF) T cells.(D) CD4/CD8 ratio of anti-BCMA CAR T cells derived from the different groups (at Day 14) measured by FACS. (E) Representative dot plot showingpermanently dysfunctional T cells, characterized by CD38+CD101+, in HD-derived versus MM-derived CAR T cells. (F) Quantification of CD38+CD101+ andTIGIT+ T cells on HD-derived versus MM-derived CAR T cells (n=4). (G) Levels of the CD25 activation marker on UT, HD-derived CARTs and MM-derivedCARTs (n=3), measured by FACS, after co-culture with U266 MM cells for 7 days. Data represent mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, paired, 2-tailed t test.

3. Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells efficiently kill MM primary cells irrespective of genomic subgroup and independent of BCMA expression.

A

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

➢ King’s College Hospital Clinical Team

0

2000

4000

6000

HD Early MM rrMM

T ce

ll co

un

ts

(pe

r 1

0.0

00

ce

lls)

HD Early MM rrMM

PB sample AgeDisease

progressionTreatment regimen

MM 14 64 4th relapseVTD, Melphalan

Autograft, CD, RD, VD, Dara

MM 26 71 3rd relapseCTD, Melphalan

Autograft, BTD, VCD

MM 29 57 4th relapse

PAD, MelphalanAuto, KCD, CRD,

Melphalan, Auto#2, Dara

MM 36 61 3rd relapse CTD, Melphalan,

Auto#2

* *

HD

-der i

ved

BC

MA

-CA

R T

cells

MM

-der i

ved

BC

MA

-CA

R T

cells

0 .0

0 .2

0 .4

0 .6

0 .8

1 .0

CD

4/C

D8

ra

tio

Aanti-BCMA

scFv

Off-

switch

Hinge

4-1BB

CD3ζ

E

A B

A B

C

C

F

DBCMA-CAR T only BCMA-CAR T + U266 BCMA-CAR T + CD138+ MM

BCMA-CAR expressionC

MM cell lines MM primary samples

FMO

U266

H929

BM biopsy

BM processingRBC lysis

QuantifyMM cells

CTL assay

4 hours

MM panel staining / FACS analysis

D

BM sample

Patient age

Genomic subgroup

Disease Stage

Treatment regimens

#14 64 - 2VTD, Melphalan Auto,

Len, Dara

#15 73FGFR3 gain, 16q23 (4p) loss (std risk)

1 Newly diagnosed, Nil

#16 88 - 2 Newly diagnosed, Nil

#20 62 -Normal

PCs-

#21 79 p53 del (high risk) 2 VMP, DVD

#23 81 Normal (std risk) 1 Newly Diagnosed, Nil

#27 64p53 del, 1q+, 1p del

(high risk)2 Carfilzomib/Cyclo/Dex

#32 89IgH rearrangement

(but not 4,14 or 11,14) (std risk)

IgGk MGUS 8% PCs

-

#33 57 Normal (std risk) 1 VTD, Melphalan Auto

C

PB sample AgeDisease

progressionTreatment regimen

MM 24 70 newly diagnosed Nil

MM 37 79 newly diagnosed Nil

MM 18 68 2nd relapse VCD, RVD

MM 25 58 2nd relapse CTD, VCD

MM 30 69 1st relapseVTD, Melphalan

Autograft

MM 38 39 1st relapse Car/Cyclo/Dex

B D

*

**

**

EDysfunctional T cells

HD-derivedCARTs

MM-derivedCARTs

G

HD-CART

MM-CART

B

0

25

50

HD-derived CART MM-derived CART

TIG

IT+

cells

(%

)

0

25

50

HD-derived CART MM-derived CART

CD

38

+ CD

10

1+

cells

(%

)

CD38+CD101+

Earl

y M

M g

rou

prr

MM

gro

up

➢ KCL Haemato-Oncology Tissue Bank Team ➢ Patients and families

No BCMA expression BCMA expression

Samples

MM14FMO

MM15MM16MM21MM27MM32MM33

Samples

MM20

FMO

MM23

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

UT CART HD CART MM

CD

25

leve

ls (

MFI

)

-20

0

20

40

60

80

REH-BCMA REH 14 15 16 20 21 23 27 32 33

Spe

cifi

c B

CM

A-C

AR

T c

ell

killi

ng

(%)

MM samples

Financial relationships to disclose: Research Funding or Employment: Allogene Therapeutics – AMM, TB, CS, BS, RB Pfizer – AMM, BB, RB Servier – AJ, GH, RB Honoraria, Consultancy or Conference Support: Gilead – GH, RB Janseen – KC Takeda - KC, RB Amgen – KC, RB Novartis – RB Eusapharm - RB

0

20

40

60

80

100

Naïve CM EM EFF

CD

4 T

ce

lls (

%)

HD early MM rrMM

0

20

40

60

80

100

Naïve CM EM EFF

CD

8 T

ce

lls (

%)

MM cell lines and CD138+ primary MM cells (24h co-culture)

CAR Ts + U266 + H929 + MM 32 + MM 33 + MM 41 + MM 42

BCMA levels

(MFI)

- 2289 5598 291 1184 858 2235

CD25+ T cells (%)

5.3% 73.6% 64.2% 16.7% 55.5% 53.3% 51.4%

IFN-g (pg/mL)

22.7 4980.9 1025.0 686.0 595.0 N/A N/A

TNF-a(pg/mL)

5.9 616.3 74.4 157.2 65.6 N/A N/A 10:1 5:1 2.5:1 1:1

Samples Samples