all forestry and forest products operations 2014 · 2015-12-08 · our team of 150 forestry...

Sustainability Summary All Forestry and

Forest Products Operations

2014

JDI SuStaInabIlIty RepoRt 20142

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

Legend

paper

Corrugating MeDiuM

Crown lanD1,046,966 ha

FreeholD lanD1,311,540 ha

ConsuMer proDuCts

tissue

tree nurseries speCialty wooD proDuCts

harDwooD

spF* luMber

white pine

CeDarsaw

Mil

ls pulp (nbsk**, nbhk***)

*spruce pine Fir**northern bleached softwood kraft***northern bleached hardwood kraft

Juniper

Fort edward, nY

toronto, ontario

Chipman

doaktown

SuSSextruro

St. Leonard

Veneer

kedgwiCk

Fort kent

dixFieLd

Saint John

monCton

Baker Brook

St. george

irVing woodLandS

QUEBEC

NOVA SCOTIA

PEI

NEW BRUNSWICK

MAINE

JDI MAP OF OPERATIONS

CLair

aShLand

JDI SuStaInabIlIty RepoRt 2014 3

All forests owned or managed are

SFI certified

All Maine woodlands are Forest Stewardship

Council® (FSC® C041515) certified

All forests owned or managed and IPP, IPL, ITC (Saint John) & LUP

Our new Brunswick and nova Scotia owned

or managed forests are certified by the

Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) while our

Maine woodlands are certified to the Forest

Stewardship Council® (FSC®) Standard. Our

sustainable forest management practices

require us to plan and forecast 80 years into the

future to responsibly sustain our forests. These

forest management plans and practices are

applied across all of our owned and managed

woodland, both in Canada and the U.S.


OUR APPROACh TO SUSTAINABlE FOREST MANAgEMENTtaking a Long-term, LandSCape View

Our business begins with the forest. JDI’s

approach to sustainable forest management

(SFM) is based on a long-term planning process

that reflects a full life cycle of trees on the land

we own or manage. As a company that owns

and manages forests as part of our integrated

value chain, JDI has been pro-actively

embracing the principles and practices of

SFM. Today, our commitment is stronger than

ever as we continue to invest in expertise and

advanced technologies, applying disciplined

science to forest modeling and forecasting.

Sustainable forest management at JDI means

balancing and managing environmental, social,

and economic outcomes in the working forests

we own or manage.

Focused on rigorous land management and

responsible stewardship, Irving Woodlands is

guided by a 100-year Management Plan that

preserves the environmental and ecological

integrity of our land, air, water, and wildlife.

Our team of 150 forestry professionals bring

an everyday commitment to ensuring healthy

forests - applying disciplined science, advanced

technology, and best practices while ensuring

accountability through independent audits and

environmental certification.

Our approach to sustainable forest

management includes:

• Nurseries and seed production

• Tree planting and stand tending

• Planning, modeling, growth, and yield

monitoring

• Road construction and maintenance

• Harvesting and transportation

• Wood procurement and sales

• Fish, wildlife, recreational and environmental

management

• Wildlife reserves

• Deer wintering areas

• Old spruce/fir habitat blocks

• Vegetation community and successional

stages

• Watercourse buffer zones

• Aesthetic buffers

• Voluntary unique and recreational area

conservation

• Forest fire and other forest protection

activities

• Research, development, and continuous

improvement

• Performance measurement and

accountability through internal and external

audits3

THIRDPARTY AUDIT

MAPPING

OPERATINGPLAN

RESOURCEANALYSIS

INVENTORY

MANAGEMENTPLAN

6

4

5 2

1

80-100YEARS AHEAD

Sustainable Forest Management Planning 80-100 Years Ahead


$714M in total

employment income

supported

$970M in local

purchases – a 5 year high

25% decrease

in our Recordable

Incident Rate (RIR)

506 new hires

EC

O

NOMIC

EN

VIR

ONMENTAL

SOC

IAL

HealthyEnvironment

Growing &Engaging

People

VibrantCommunities

Strong Partnerships for Business

Success

Safe andEfficient

OperationsSustainability at

J.D. Irving, LimitedOver 130 years

of quality products and service to valued

customers}25%

increase in Unique Areas

sites from 2012-2014

OUR SUSTAINABIlITy FRAMEWORKVaLueS and approaCh to SuStainaBiLitY

JDI’s core values and approach to sustainability enable us to operate at the highest standards and to meet the evolving needs and expectations of our stakeholders. Our sustainability framework consists of five focus areas which provide the structure for communicating our environmental, social, and economic performance.

Jdi’S SuStainaBiLitY Framework

JDI Core Values

People & Teamwork

Quality Products & Service

Results Driven

Continuous Improvement & Innovation

Integrity

Fast & Flexible

Health, Safety & Environment

Customer Focus


PERFORMANCE AT A glANCE

HeAlTHY eNVIRONMeNT 2012 2013 2014Sustainable harvest levels Crown land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/HA/YR 1.4 1.3 1.6

Actual harvest levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/HA/YR 1.4 1.5 1.4

Sustainable harvest levels freehold land. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/HA/YR 2.2 2.1 2.2

Actual harvest levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/HA/YR 2.3 2.1 2.1

Total sustainable forest management audit non-conformities ( /143 requirements) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # 3/143 2/143 2/143

Greenhouse gas emissions from energy produced on site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS CO2e 318,872 321,000 350,890

Greenhouse gas from purchased electricity1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS CO2e 727,784 731,062 741,889

Sulphur dioxide emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS SO2 688 1,221 1,469

Permit non-compliances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # 7 1 4

Water usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3 65,501,158 64,860,806 62,836,364

Unique area sites protected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # 923 1,136 1,155

Size of unique areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HeCTAReS 80,638 80,933 78,976

Mapped watercourse buffers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HeCTAReS 192,270 192,270 192,270

SAFe & eFFICIeNT OPeRATIONS

Total direct energy usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . gIgAJOULeS 19,772,672 20,075,406 19,969,203

Total waste diverted from landfill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 76 90 2 73

Renewable fuels used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 60.8 62.6 58.3

Safety recordable incident rate (RIR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # FOR eVeRY 200,000 HOURS WORkeD 4.1 4.6 3.4

Lost time accident rate (LTA). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # FOR eVeRY 200,000 HOURS WORkeD 1.2 1.1 1.0

All financial data throughout this report is in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.

1 2012 and 2013 data has been restated to be comparable to 2014 data using GHG emission factors from the National Inventory Report – GHG Sources and Sinks In Canada 1990-2012, which was released by environment Canada in 2014. https://www.ec.gc.ca/ges-ghg/default.asp?lang=en&n=83A34A7A-1

2 The capital investment made at our Irving Tissue operation in Toronto resulted in a 200,058 tonne increase in our total waste and an overall diversion rate of 90%. Without this one-time construction-related increase, our diversion rate was 81%.


GROWING & eNGAGING PeOPle 2012 2013 2014Women in executive positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 29 27 27

new hires . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # 325 372 506

STRONG PARTNeRSHIPS FOR BUSINeSS SUCCeSS

Capital investment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ MILLIOnS 52 244 189

Total local purchases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ MILLIOnS 779 965 970

VIBRANT COMMUNITIeS

Total employment income supported. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ MILLIOnS 639 674 714


J.D. IRVINg, lIMITED’S FOREST MANAgEMENT STRATEgIESnew BrunSwiCk Crown ForeSt StrategY

On March 12, 2014, the Province of new

Brunswick announced a new Crown Forest

Strategy, “Putting our Resources to Work”. In

this landmark policy, the Province of New

Brunswick identified the forestry sector as a

mainstay of the provincial economy, pledging

to strategically manage forest land to ensure

that “both Crown and private woodlands can

support economic development opportunities”.

A key goal of the New Brunswick Crown Forest

Strategy is to create the certainty of supply

needed for industry to invest in its long-term

future. With more Crown wood available, JDI

has committed to substantial investments in

mill modernization and equipment, creating

new jobs and securing existing jobs for New

Brunswickers. The strategy to harvest more is

balanced by a shared commitment to a healthy,

vibrant forest with trees at various stages of

maturity and with practices that respect the

principles of conservation and biodiversity.

Tracking Performance Against Our Commitments

Addressing concerns expressed by New

Brunswickers over transparency, a “results-

based” framework was introduced by

the Province of new Brunswick to make

management practices of the Crown forests

more accountable to the public. Additionally,

JDI posted a performance bond guaranteeing

its compliance, which will be assessed by a third

party.

Our performance is measured annually by

independent third parties and will be publicly

reported against our 1-year, 5-year, and 25-year

management plans. The framework is based

around three primary themes; the stewardship

nB ForeSt management Framework

Values goals

Terrestrial Biodiversity

The full variety of healthy and resilient native forested ecosystems are present and sustainable across their ecological ranges.

The full range of native forest-dwelling vertebrates are present and sustainable across their ecological ranges.

Populations of consumptively used wildlife are maintained at desired levels.

Water Quality & Aquatic Ecosystems

The integrity of watercourses and wetlands will be maintained so as to preserve the physical, chemical, and biological properties and functions of these systems in their natural state.

SoilHarvest and silviculture operations on Crown land will preserve soil function, processes, and health through minimizing disturbance and contamination.

growing the Resource

Crown forests will be used to sustainably supply timber to NB’s forest sector. Forest management will plan harvest and silviculture activities such to optimize the potential economic value of wood fiber from Crown lands.

Optimizing the Value Chain

Trees harvested from Crown forests will be used to provide maximum benefit to the people of new Brunswick.

Access to Crown Forests

Forest road networks will allow traditional non-commercial access to Crown lands.

Forests surrounding waterways of traditional high-recreational use will be managed to maintain aesthetic quality, user experience, and integrity.

Transparency DNR, Stakeholders, and members of the public will have access to important information regarding the management of Crown forests.

of the environment, supporting a vibrant

forest sector, and maintaining social license

to operate. It includes seven specific values

and related underlying goals and objectives

which are listed below. This framework will

be used for mandatory public reporting which

will begin in mid-2015, after our first full year

of operation under the new Brunswick Crown

Forest Strategy (April 1, 2014 – March 31,

2015).


hEAlThy ENVIRONMENTgroups we work with to protect wild Atlantic

salmon habitat:

• Atlantic Salmon Federation

• Miramichi Salmon Association

• Canadian Rivers Institute at UNB

• NB Salmon Council

• Restigouche River Watershed Management

Looking Forward

We are focused on fulfilling our commitments

related to protected areas, conservation, and

SFM. We will report on our progress related to

these commitments in 2015.

We continue to preserve and enhance

biodiversity on our owned and managed land.

In 2014, we increased the number of sites we

protect to 1,155 as part of our Unique Areas

voluntary conservation program - the largest of

its kind in Atlantic Canada. While the number

of sites increased, the total area decreased as a

result of land in Nova Scotia being sold as well

as donated to Nature Conservancy of Canada.

Further, in 2014 our Woodlands division

dedicated 1,300 hours to biodiversity and

conservation-related training including rare

plant identification, wildlife conservation, and

watercourse buffers.

Additionally, JDI has set an objective to designate and maintain old forest within the working forest landscape – to date, more than 48,434 hectares (119,679 acres) have been designated towards meeting this objective.

old ForestSites

48,434 ha

Aes

thet

ics

Bir

ds &

Mam

mal

s

Lakes &

Wetlands

Geological &

Fossil

Reptiles &

Invertebrates

Unique Forest

Stands

Fish

Old Growth &

High-Conservation

Forests

PlantsHistoric

7

1,155totaL # oF SiteS

totaL heCtareS: 78,976totaL aCreS: 195,147

93

45

470

2021

277

41

49

123

uniQue areaS – proteCted SiteS BY CategorY


SPOTlIghT ON ThE NB FORESTRY AGREEMENT:Investing $513 million in modernization

In Spring 2014, with the certainty of a secure fibre supply, JDI

announced $513 million in major investments to upgrade and

modernize our operations, including the largest investment in a kraft

pulp mill in Canada since 1993. JDI’s investments include:

IRVING PULP & PAPER MILL ($455 million):

• $200 million

New chip screening and handling system

new continuous chip digester

• $255 million

New pulp dryer

SAWMILLS DIVISION ($41.5 million):

• $23 million

New equipment upgrade at Chipman’s Grand lake

Timber Sawmill

• $15 million

New sawmill at Doaktown’s White Pine Value-added Centre

• $3.5 million

Upgrades to sawmill equipment in St. leonard and kedgwick

WOODLANDS DIVISION ($16.5 million):

• $7.3 million

Increased silviculture on freehold woodlands near St. Leonard

• $6 million

New forestry equipment in northern New Brunswick

• $3.2 million

New seedling research laboratory at Sussex Nursery

“This investment is a tribute to the everyday skill, passion, and dedication of all employees who help sustain world-class forest products operations from our home here in New Brunswick. The pulp mill is a cornerstone for thousands of jobs – from foresters and woods workers to private wood producers, sawmills, paper, corrugating medium and high value tissue products.”

Jim Irving Co-CEO of J.D. Irving, limited


Basis weight reduction is a win-win for the customer and the environment

At Irving Paper, we are continuously fine-tuning

our paper-making process to meet the needs

of our customers. Over the past five years,

we’ve been able to reduce our basis weight

without sacrificing key quality characteristics

like opacity. Today, a 30-pound basis weight roll

of paper would stretch 10% further than a roll

of 33-pound basis weight. Overall, less weight

means less trees, energy, and transportation

used in the production of the paper. Imagine

the savings of postage cost when mailing

inserts, catalogs, and magazines to 20 million

households. It’s a win-win-win for customers,

the environment, and our operations.

SAFE & EFFICIENT OPERATIONS

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

201420132012

Total Direct Energy Used

19,772,672 20,075,406 19,969,203

GIG

AJO

ULE

S

Rec

ord

able

Inci

den

t R

ate

Recordable Incident Rate

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

201420132012

Irving TissueLake Utopia Paper

Irving PaperIrving Pulp and Paper

SawmillsWoodlands

Looking Forward

Safety training continues to be a priority in

2015, as we roll out SafeStart® to our other

operations. In addition to SafeStart®, we will be

implementing increased incident investigation

reporting (near misses and root cause analysis)

in the year ahead.

As our mill modernizations move ahead,

the investment in new technology at Irving

Pulp & Paper is projected to reduce energy

consumption, GHG emissions, and wood ash

generation while further improving our safety

performance.

Lost

Tim

e A

ccid

ent

Rat

e

Lost Time Accident Rate

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

201420132012

Irving TissueLake Utopia Paper

Irving PaperIrving Pulp and Paper

SawmillsWoodlands


STRONg PARTNERShIPS FOR BUSINESS SUCCESSOur customers value our

commitment to research,

innovation, integrated

solutions, and superior

customer service. Investing for

the future enables us to build

even stronger partnerships

with businesses, universities,

community organizations, and

non-profit organizations.

perFormanCe

Our forestry and forest products divisions

depend on the strong relationships we’ve built

with over 1700 suppliers in 250 communities,

creating valuable partnerships and a reliable

supply chain that benefit our customers. In

2014, total local purchases, including goods

and services, wood purchases, and payments

to woodlands contractors increased slightly

to $970 million – an all-time high over the

past five years. In 2014 we purchased over

1,598,000 MT from private wood lot owners.

JdI is the largest purchaser of private wood in

new Brunswick.

To strengthen our competitive edge, we invest

in our operations when we can and when

opportunity arises. In 2013, we invested heavily

in our Irving Tissue (Toronto) operations.

2014 was another significant year for capital

investment with the beginning of Phase 2 of

the pulp and paper mill modernization project,

as well as the opening of the Ashland, Maine

Softwood Sawmill, for a total of $189 million.

keY initiatiVeS

Continuous product innovation

Our forestry and forest products businesses

have an excellent track record of being on

the leading edge of research, technology, and

product development. This has increased

operational efficiencies in the internal value

chain and also has created value for our

customers. examples across our divisions

include:

WOODlANDS DIVISION

liDAR

Seedling research & development

SAWMIll DIVISION

latest technology in one mill upgrade

(Chipman) and one new mill (Ashland)

New, value added products (animal bedding)

PUlP & PAPeR DIVISION

New high Performance (hP) corrugating

medium grade developed

New Opulence® SCA++ Paper grade

developed

Customer specific customized paper grades

with world class technical support

TISSUe DIVISION

New Through-Air-Dried (TAD) tissue machines

New Velour® brand developed

2014 Wood Sources

27%

41%

32%

Wood harvested from Crown land

Wood harvested from Freehold land

Purchased wood


JDI FOREST PRODUCTS SCORECARDJDI forestry and forest products includes Irving Woodlands, Irving Pulp & Paper, Irving Paper, lake

Utopia Paper, Irving Tissue, and Irving Sawmills. It is headquartered in Saint John, nB.

eNVIRONMeNTAl 2012 2013 2014SUSTAINABle FOReSTRY

Woodlands land base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HeCTAReS 2,388,000 2,375,000 2,358,506

land base harvested (Crown) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 1.2 1.1 1.1

land base harvested (freehold) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 1.9 1.8 2.2

Trees planted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # OF SeedLIngS 19,161,244 24,802,323 20,462,290

Wood harvested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 6,744,791 6,297,344 6,315,957

Actual harvest levels (Crown). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/HA/YR 1.4 1.5 1.4

Sustainable harvest levels (Crown) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/HA/YR 1.4 1.3 1.6

Actual harvest levels (freehold). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/HA/YR 2.3 2.1 2.1

Sustainable harvest levels (freehold) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/HA/YR 2.2 2.1 2.2

Average annual growth of the forest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/HA/YR 2.2 2.1 2.2

Mapped watercourse buffers (total) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HeCTAReS 192,270 192,270 192,270

Watercourse distances under management (total) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .kM 27,422 27,422 27,422

Ability to successfully reforest (tree planting - second year survival rates) . . . . . . . . % SURVIVING/YR 91 91 85

Total forest management audits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # OF NON-COMPlIANCeS 3/143 2/143 2/143

Stream crossings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % COMPLIAnCe 100 100 100

BIODIVeRSITY

Volunteer conservation areas on JDI land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HeCTAReS 80,638 80,933 78,976

WATeR

Water usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .M3 65,501,158 64,860,806 62,836,364

Biological oxygen demand (BOD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 3,666 4,148 4,023

Total suspended solids (TSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 6,201 6,909 7,129


2012 2013 2014SOlID WASTe

Total waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 132,135 341,746 148,288

landfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 24 9 27

Waste diverted (recycled or reused) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 76 90 73

Hazardous waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 0.08 0.08 0.23

AIR eMISSIONS

nOx (oxides of nitrogen) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 1,481 1,459 1,512

SOx (oxides of sulfur) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 688 1,221 1,469

dust Total Particulate Matter (TPM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 2,387 2,442 2,780

ClIMATe CHANGe

Total GHG emissions (direct & indirect) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) TOnneS 1,262,020 1,257,292 1,092,780

eNeRGY

Total energy used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . gIgAJOULeS 26,177,893 26,453,528 26,596,816

Direct energy (produced on site) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 76 76 75

Purchased electricity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 24 24 25

Renewable fuels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 57 59 58

Nonrenewable fuels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 43 41 40

eNVIRONMeNTAl COMPlIANCe

Odour complaints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # 16 13 36

Permit non-compliances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # 7 1 4

JDI FOREST PRODUCTS SCORECARD


SOCIAL 2012 2013 2014Number of employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .# FUll-TIMe eqUIVAleNTS 3,850 4,033 4,185

Recruitment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% OF eMPlOYeeS JOINING THe COMPANY 8.4 9.2 12.1

DIVeRSITY

Women in the workforce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 16.3 13.8 12.0

Women in executive positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 29.3 27.0 27.0

HeAlTH AND SAFeTY

Fatalities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # 0 0 0

Recordable incident rate. . . . # OF ReCORDABle INCIDeNTS X 200,000/TOTAl HOURS WORkeD 4.1 4.6 3.4

Lost time accident rate. . . . . . . . . . . . .# lOST TIMe ACCIDeNTS X 200,000/TOTAl HOURS WORkeD 1.2 1.1 1.0

eCOnOMIC BeneFIT

Capital investment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ MILLIOnS 52 244 189

Total local purchases1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ MILLIOnS 779 965 970

Total employment income suppported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ MILLIOnS 639 674 714

1 Includes good and services, wood purchases and payments to woodlands contractors

JDI FOREST PRODUCTS SCORECARD


SAWMIllS SCORECARD

eNVIRONMeNTAl 2012 2013 2014lumber production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MFBM 778,773 821,308 904,264

eNeRGY

Total energy consumption (direct & indirect) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .gIgAJOULeS 2,552,729 2,813,106 2,889,604Total energy use intensity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .GIGAJOUleS/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 0.688 0.725 0.730

eNeRGY MIX

Renewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 80 80 82Non-renewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 18 18 17

ClIMATe CHANGe

Total GHG emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) TOnneS 90,487 100,173 89,600

Total GHG emissions intensity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kG GHGe/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 24 26 23AIR eMISSIONS

nOx (oxides of nitrogen) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 198 221 223SOx (oxides of sulfur) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 34 40 42dust Total Particulate Matter (TPM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 2,318 2,324 2,556

SOlID WASTe

Total waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 50,501 56,540 59,592Non-hazardous waste to landfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 51.1 45.0 54.3Non-hazardous waste diverted (recycled or reused) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 48.9 54.9 45.6Hazardous waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 0.1 0.1 0.1

SOCIALNumber of employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .FUll-TIMe eqUIVAleNTS 1,212 1,188 1,271

HeAlTH & SAFeTY

Recordable incident rate. . . . # OF ReCORDABle INCIDeNTS X 200,000/TOTAl HOURS WORkeD 7.3 7.8 5.7Lost time accident rate. . . . . . . . . # OF lOST TIMe ACCIDeNTS X 200,000/TOTAl HOURS WORkeD 2.1 2.3 1.6

IRVINg PUlP & PAPER SCORECARD

eNVIRONMeNTAl 2012 2013 2014Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 330,527 335,534 322,730Products available with SFI or FSC® Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 81 76 80

WATeR

Water usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .M3 38,634,893 38,063,833 36,180,598Water usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 117 113 112Biological oxygen demand (BOD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 2,480 2,825 2,607Total suspended solids (TSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 2,710 3,061 2,876

eNeRGY

Total energy consumption (direct & indirect) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .gIgAJOULeS 11,826,070 12,111,339 11,393,946eNeRGY MIX

Total energy use intensity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .GIGAJOUleS/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 35.8 36.1 35.3Renewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 91 91 89Non-renewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 9 9 11

ClIMATe CHANGe


Total GHG emissions intensity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kG GHGe/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 228 266 256AIR eMISSIONS

nOx (oxides of nitrogen) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 929 891 936SOx (oxides of sulfur) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 409 912 1,087dust Total Particulate Matter (TPM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 56 105 196


Odour complaints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # OF COMPLAInTS 6 3 1Permit non-compliances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAl # OF NON-COMPlIANCeS 3 0 2

SOlID WASTe

Total waste* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 27,604 28,132 32,240Waste to landfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 1.9 2.3 1.7Waste diverted (recycled or reused) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 98.1 97.7 98.2

SOCIALNumber of employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .FUll-TIMe eqUIVAleNTS 343 343 350

HeAlTH & SAFeTY


*Irving Pulp & Paper produces no hazardous waste

*lake Utopia Paper produces no hazardous waste

lAKE UTOPIA PAPER SCORECARD

eNVIRONMeNTAl 2012 2013 2014Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 172,647 186,425 186,107Amount of recycled input materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 61,803 62,595 63,074

WATeR

Water usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .M3 5,813,132 5,853,925 4,974,811Water usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 34 31 27Biological oxygen demand (BOD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 218 292 310Total suspended solids (TSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 272 268 316

eNeRGY

Total energy consumption (direct & indirect) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .gIgAJOULeS 1,851,316 1,780,202 1,583,280Total energy use intensity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .GIGAJOUleS/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 10.7 9.5 8.5

eNeRGY MIX

Renewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 23 18 24Non-renewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 77 82 76

ClIMATe CHANGe

Total GHG emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) TOnneS 108,148 110,818 104,401

Total GHG emissions intensity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kG GHGe/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 626 594 561AIR eMISSIONS

nOx (oxides of nitrogen) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 169 162 169SOx (oxides of sulfur) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 244 243 176dust Total Particulate Matter (TPM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 7 5 12


Odour complaints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # OF COMPLAInTS 10 10 35Permit non-compliances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAl # OF NON-COMPlIANCeS 4 1 2

SOlID WASTe

Total waste* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 18,843 19,191 5,923Waste to landfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .% 14 19 72Waste diverted (recycled or reused) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 86 81 28

SOCIALNumber of employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .FUll-TIMe eqUIVAleNTS 140 138 143

HeAlTH & SAFeTY


IRVINg PAPER SCORECARD

eNVIRONMeNTAl 2012 2013 2014Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 410,541 401,539 412,530Products available with SFI or FSC® Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 64 75 84

WATeR

Water usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3 12,180,611 12,302,291 12,609,568Water usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 29.7 30.6 30.6Biological oxygen demand (BOD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 622 646 647Total suspended solids (TSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 2,398 2,763 2,816

eNeRGY

Total energy consumption (direct & indirect) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . gIgAJOULeS 6,103,260 6,059,714 6,107,838eNeRGY MIX

Total energy use intensity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GIGAJOUleS/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 14.9 15.1 14.8Renewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 14 14 25Nonrenewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 86 86 75

ClIMATe CHANGe

Total GHG emissions (direct & indirect) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) TOnneS 760,072 744,642 610,058

Total GHG emissions intensity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .kG GHGe/TONNe OF PRODUCTION 1,851 1,854 1,479AIR eMISSIONS

nOx (oxides of nitrogen) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 103 108 108SOx (oxides of sulfur) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 0.5 25.9 162.8dust Total Particulate Matter (TPM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 6.0 7.7 16.5


Odour complaints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # OF COMPLAInTS 0 0 0Permit non-compliances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # 0 0 0

SOlID WASTe

Total waste* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 49,302 51,404 59,920Waste diverted (recycled or reused) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 99.0 99.1 99.1Waste to landfill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 1.00 0.90 0.87

SOCIALNumber of employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FUll-TIMe eqUIVAleNTS 313 311 306

HeAlTH & SAFeTY

Recordable incident rate. . . .# OF ReCORDABle INCIDeNTS X 200,000/TOTAl HOURS WORkeD 2.8 2.4 1.8Lost time accident rate. . . . . . . . .# OF lOST TIMe ACCIDeNTS X 200,000/TOTAl HOURS WORkeD 2.5 0.9 0.6

*Irving Paper produces no hazardous waste

IRVINg TISSUE SCORECARD

eNVIRONMeNTAl 2012 2013 2014WATeR

Water usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M3 8,872,522 8,640,757 9,071,387Biological oxygen demand (BOD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 346 385 460Total suspended solids (TSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOnneS 821 817 1,121

eNeRGY

Total energy consumption (direct & indirect) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . gIgAJOULeS 3,844,518 3,689,167 4,330,694eNeRGY MIX

Renewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 23 31 26Non-renewable energy use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 77 69 74

ClIMATe CHANGe


AIR eMISSIONS

nOx (oxides of nitrogen) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 82 77 76SOx (oxides of sulfur) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 1.2 0.2 0.2dust Total Particulate Matter (TPM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 0 0 0


Odour complaints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . # OF COMPLAInTS 0 0 0Permit non-compliances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOTAl # OF NON-COMPlIANCeS 0 0 0

SOlID WASTe

Non-hazardous waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 6,221 207,269* 14,108Non-hazardous waste to landfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 32 1 17Non-hazardous waste diverted (recycled or reused) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 68 99 76Hazardous waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOnneS 85 233 274

SOCIALNumber of employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .FUll-TIMe eqUIVAleNTS 1,053 1,107 1,116

HeAlTH & SAFeTY


*One time event, Toronto Tissue Mill expansion.

all forestry and forest products operations 2014 · 2015-12-08 · our team of 150 forestry...

Documents