alignment of funding in implementation of the european union strategy for the baltic sea region and...

12
Alignment of funding in implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and the role of Obj 1 and Obj 2 funds => Art. 37.6.b as a means to cooperate/align INTERACT Point Turku

Upload: patrick-pearson

Post on 13-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Alignment of funding in implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and the role of Obj 1 and Obj 2 funds

=> Art. 37.6.b as a means to cooperate/align

INTERACT Point Turku

14 June 2011 | Bergen, Norway

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the EUSBSR

Finances to support EUSBSR

•No new funding, no new institutions, no new legislation;

•Coordinate and interlink existing funds;

•Use existing funds more effectively to support key functions;

•Have to be innovative and open minded;

• to open discussions between the stakeholders of the EUSBSR;

• to present different funding sources available for implementation of the EUSBSR;

• to identify the challenges and obstacles in aligning various funding sources;

• to work on the solutions on how the EUSBSR activities (Flagship Projects) could be implemented in practice.

2

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the EUSBSR

Financial engineering:

–repacking of funds in a creative way;

–use of the Commission´s 4 existing initiatives: Jeramie, Jaspers, Jessica and Jasmine and bringing in IFI:s

–supported networking among the programmes/funds;

–elaborated various solutions on alignment of funding;

–sectors identified where the alignment of funding is needed;

–challenges and obstacles discussed in alignment of funding.

3

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the EUSBSR

Funds available:

–ERDF – Obj 1/Convergence, Obj 2/Competitiveness and Obj 3/ETC;

–European Agricultural fund for rural development;

- European Fisheries Fund;

- External Border Cooperation Programmes (ENPI);

–Other EU Programmes (FP 7, Life+, Eco-Innovation, CIP, TEN-E, BONUS …. Etc.);

–National, regional and local funds in MS;

–Intergovernmental funds (NCM, SIDA etc.);

–Own resources and other possible funds

4

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the EUSBSR

Cooperation and coordination:

–Between national and regional authorities is needed within MS and between MS;

–Needs willingness, awareness and transparence and good communication and an open mind;

–From isolation to a bigger picture for the joint contributions;

–Coordination also would minimise the risk of double funding;

–Coordination also a challenge with many stake holders and key players;

5

InvestmentsInvestments

ServicesServices

Feasability Study

Feasability Study StrategyStrategy Procuremen

tProcuremen

t

Simplified example / Flagship x in PAC y

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the EUSBSR

Steps to be taken:

–Awareness raising;

–Joint understanding of the importance of linking of funds;

–Clear roles of different stakeholders;

–Joint agreements e.g. use of art. 37.6.b;

–Pilot activities within funding of Flag ships;

–Then the design for future based on the experiences gained now

–Ask for joint cooperation, coordination and piloting supporting the whole region

7

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

INTERACT Point Turku

Spring 2011

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the EUSBSR

Time frame:

Two workshops during autumn 2011 (September; November/December); continued and developed in 2012.

Target group:

‐Workshop is planned for up to 30 participants;

‐Representatives of the national and regional development programmes (Managing Authorities/Joint Technical Secretariats/ Intermediate bodies), Priority Area Coordinators, Horizontal Action Leaders, other programmes/funds.

9

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the EUSBSR

Planned outcomes of the workshop:

–opened discussion on the possibilities to align the funding;

–information shared and raised awareness on various funding instruments;

–supported networking among the programmes/funds;

–elaborated various solutions on alignment of funding;

–sectors identified the where the alignment of funding is needed;

–challenges and obstacles discussed in alignment of funding.

10

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the EUSBSR

Draft Agenda:

–presentations on the national and regional development programmes (Convergence, Regional Competitiveness and Employment, European Territorial Cooperation); (European Fisheries Fund, European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development);

–presentations on the European Investment Bank and the Nordic Investment Bank support to the EUSBSR activities;

–presentation of some other programmes/funds;

–presentation on need aligning various funding sources, challenges and obstacles (PAC/FSP leader);

–practical exercise to work on the solutions in alignment of funding (to work on real cases/FSPs).

11

Workshop: Alignment of funding in implementation of the EUSBSR

Next steps:

–to contact PACs to specify the need for the discussion during the workshop – May 2011;

–to plan detailed agenda of the workshop – June 2011;

–to confirm the presentations – June 2011;

–to announce the workshop – July 2011;

–to organise the workshop – September 2011;

–to draw the conclusions and to plan second workshop in November/December 2011.

12