alexander hamilton federalist #78 john marshall marbury v. madison (1803)

17

Upload: gerald-pitts

Post on 01-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Page 2: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Alexander Hamilton

Federalist #78

John MarshallMarbury v.

Madison (1803)

Page 3: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Scott v. Sandford (1857)

Missouri Compromise of 1820

13th Amendment (1865)

Page 4: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Brown v. Bd. of Education (1954)

Southern Manifesto.

Page 5: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

Communist, anti-Reagan protestor.

Flag burning =free speech

Page 6: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

“Rights in conflict.”

Schenck v. U.S. (1919)

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

“Clear and Present Danger” Test

Page 7: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Roe v. Wade (1973)7-2 decision

Today’s Supreme Court:

5 appointed by Republican (pro-life) presidents.

4 appointed by Democrat (pro-choice) presidents.

Page 8: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Korematsu v. U.S. (1944)

Japanese internment5th Amendment –

Due Process?

Page 9: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Thesis: The 14th Amendment greatly increased the power and the reach of the Supreme Court!

Page 10: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Business damaged by state action.

Barron sues.

Maryland state courts refuse compensation.

Barron appeals to federal S.C. on 5th Amendment grounds.

Page 11: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Government can’t deny life, liberty or property without due

process (“Due Process” clause).

Chief Justice John Marshall.

Does the Bill of Rights restrict STATE actions?

S.C. says, NO!

Page 12: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

FEDERALISM

StateS.C.S.C.

President

Congress

StateGovt.

Const.

Bill of

Rights

State Const

.

Page 13: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

13th Amendment (1865) – outlawed slavery.

Black codes (STATE laws) limited the rights of freed

slaves.

Barron decision limited STATE cases to STATE courts.

Page 14: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

StateS.C.

State District Courts

State Appeals Courts

To Fed.Courts

Jury

Page 15: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Gives citizenship to anyone born in the United States.

“No STATE can deny life, liberty or property without due

process.”

“Nor shall any STATE deny the equal protection of the laws.

Page 16: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

FEDERALISM

StateS.C.

S.C.14th Amendment

Congress

President

StateGovt.

Const.

Bill of

Rights

State Const

.

Page 17: Alexander Hamilton Federalist #78 John Marshall Marbury v. Madison (1803)

The Barron decision limited state cases to state courts.

Black codes showed that not all states are fair to all citizens.

14th Amend was originally intended to help freed slaves.

Now it can be used by anyone to challenge unfair state laws & actions.

Re-statement of Thesis: The Supreme Court is immensely more powerful as a result of

the 14th Amendment!