alejandro cruz-cruz, a205 393 424 (bia dec. 23, 2015)

8/20/2019 Alejandro Cruz-Cruz, A205 393 424 (BIA Dec. 23, 2015)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/alejandro-cruz-cruz-a205-393-424-bia-dec-23-2015 1/7

Ne, Charles ChristopherNett Immigration Law Oice, PLLC746 E. BroadwayLouisville, KY 40202

Name: CRUZ-CRUZ, ALEJANDO

U.S Department of Justice

Execuive Oce r Immgraton Review

Board of Immigration AppealsOce of he Cerk

5107 leeshurg Pike, Se 2000Fa Cuc Vgn 2204

DHS/ICE Oice of Chie Counsel - MM80 Monroe Ave, Ste 502Memphis, TN 38102

A 20539324

Date of this notice: 12 /23/2015

nclosed s a copy o the Board's decson d rder n the abve-rerenced case.

Encosure

Panel Members:O'Ly, Bi .Gudg JohGt, Edwd R

Sncerey,

DO ctDonn CrrCief Cerk

Useream: Dockt

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visitwww.irac.net/unpublished/index/

I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n

t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a

c . n e t

Cite as: Alejandro Cruz-Cruz, A205 393 424 (BIA Dec. 23, 2015)



Executive Ofce r Imigraton Revew

Decson o the Board o mton Appels

Fs Chrch, Vr 22041

File A205 393 424 Memphis,

n re ALEJDO CRUZ-CRU

IN REMOVAL POCEDINGS

PP

Dae:

ON BEHALF F SPONDET: Chrles C. Net, sqre

APPLICATON: eopening

DEC 2 3 015

The responden, a nave and ciizen of Mexico, appeals om he Immiaon dge'sdeision daed Sepember 19, 2014, denying hs imely led moion o reopen of hise 23, 201, order of removal. The appeal will be ssned.

The Bord ders o e al ndings of an igraon Jdge, nless hey e clelyeoneos, i reains independen den and disreion, sbjec o appliable govegsdards, regding qesions of law and e applicon of a pilr sndrd of la o hosecs 8 CF.R §§ 1003 (d)(3)(i), (ii).

The Bod will reopen hese proceedings o allow he responden o apply r adsme ofsas purs o secion 245 of he Imiaion d Naonaliy Ac, 8 US.C § 1255 See

Matter of Velarde, 23 &N Dec 25 (BA 2002) holding ha a properly le moion o reopenr adsen of s base on a mage enered ino er he commenemen of proeedingsmay be ed in he exercse of discreion, nowisding he pendency of a visa peiion leon e aliens behal, where (1) e moion o reopen is imely led (2) he moon is nonmeially bed by he reglons (3) e moion is no baed by Matter o Shaar 21 I&NDe. 541 (BA 1996), or on ay oer procedural grods; ( ) cle d convinng evidene ispresened indiaing a song likelihood ha e mrriage is bona de; d 5) he Depen ofomeld Seciy DHS does no oppose he moion or es is opposiion solely on Matter ofArthur 20 I&N De. 475 (BA 1992)) ee also Maer ofLamus 25 &N De 61 (2009). Theresponden presened evidence esablshing ha he maied a ned Staes ciien onMay 3, 201, nd e cople has a hild wo was bo on Novemer 21, 2012 I addiion, he

responden's spose led a vsa peiion om -130) on his behalf on Ags 1, 2014, whiwa more h a mo aer he hering, d he saes a orae evens prevened herom g e vsa eon o o he en oeover, e DHS a no le a opposonon appeal o e reopeng o hese proeengs. n ligh of he regoing, he proceeings willbe reopened

I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n


c . n e t




A205 393 424

Accordingly, e lowing order will be entered.

OER: Te appeal is susained d ese proceens e reopened d remded frer proceens consistent i the regoing opinion.

2

I m m i g r a n t & R e f u

g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a

c . n e t




LYSS

A moton to reopen mst e ed witin nnety days of the date of ent of a naladmnistative ode of emoval. 8 CF § 100323() (211 e, the otionshal state the new cts that wll e poven at a heng to e hed f the moton s

anted ad sha be sppoed y aavits and other evdentay mateia 8 C.R. 100323()(3) (2011 Te Cot w ony grant the moton f t is satsed thatevdence soght to be oeed s mateial and was not avalale a cold not have eendiscoveed o pesented at the me heang" Id. Any moton to reopen in order topoceed th an appcaton eief mst e accompaned by the appropiate applicon elief an all sppoting docments Id Additionally, sch motons to eopen toapply dscretiony reief w not be ganted if it appeas that the aliens ight toapply sch rele was lly expained to him o e by the mmgaton Jdge and anopponity to apy teee was aded at the heang, ness te relief is soght onthe ass of ccmstances tat have aisen sseent to the eaing Id

Respondet was odeed emoved on ne 23, 2014 espondent led hs otonto eopen on eptemer 5, 2014, withn the 90-day peo, and theee his oton istimely

oeve, Respondents oton does not demonstrate that the evidence he wisesto oe is matea and as not available nd cold not have een discoveed opesented at a mer heag." espondt ages that at his master calenda heang onne 23, 2014 this Cou asked Respondents pio consel, sty OBien whethe anmmigat vsa petition ad een ed, to wich r OBien answeed n the negatveand eqested a cotnance espondent states that his Cort inqied as to why sch apetition had no een ed, an [ ]ere espondent cold oe a esponse, hemaintans that M OBien advised the Co that he had noted Respondent/hs wion multiple occasions o the need o e an Immigant Vsa Petiton and thatRespondent had ied to contact hm" Motion at 2 Respondent states that the Co tendenied Resondents eqest a continance, alowed espondent to consdervoln departe, and then odeed Respondent emoved Responent ages that hsand his wis ile to e an immgant visa petton po to his maste caendaheaing as good case, icding: is/hs wfes peoccpation with the lotom two seos mes apparntly pepetated st aganst hs two yong step-chidrenand then agans his wfe and step-daghte; (2) Hs tempoay inabity as the soepovide a mily of sx, whose income was dspted a peod of two months aehis eay 203 aest to meet OBriens demand a $2,00000 ayment towadhe 876800 raing alance of his accont and (3) is nawareness of he seveecnseecs of iig e mgt isa etion ed s benet oeehis Jne 23, 204 heang" oton a 3 In sppo of his petition, Respondent povidesan Assesset of Aleged Cd Ase o Neglect evdence o his step-cidensconselng, n Incdent Repo om the Jeesonville Police Depatment, an ndictmentin tate ofndiana v Chaes Evans, coespondence om Respondents pevosconsel, a copy of Respondent's wis immgnt isa petiton, and a recept notice that petition otion to eopen

2

I m m i g r a n t & R e f u

g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n


c . n e t



esite Resodets ssertos dug hs herg ts Cou red s to whys etto had ot bee led, to whic Mr. Ore exaed that thee was soequestio to weer t woud e e, becuse Resodet ad hs wfe were workg

through soe ssues" Addtioay, ths Court ud that Respodet had otramfce elgity r an -30 etto, as he ha ot rovided a coof hs rrge cecate h d s we or r ceicate his chld. As aresult of Resodet's le to demosate pimc elgty the ourt deiedesodet's reest a cotiuce to le s 3 ettio. Resodet thedeced voutary deure d te Cour odered hm remove.

Whie he o sythzes wit the Resodets l's situatio rior to hsater cae heg, he Cour canot d that the edece Resoet has owroded ot availabe could ot hve bee dscovered or reseted at a rmereg." Resodet d hs w wee med o May 3, 23 d Resodet'sdaughter s o Novemer 2 212, wel ere Resodet's Je 23 214 eghe abuse to Respodets stechidre was reored o or about ebruy 24, 23 de cidet with ales Evs i Resodets home occured i October 23, ohror to esodets eg. Resoet hs ot exlaied ow the evets outlied is dvt preete h om rovdig Ore wth the aage d bcecates ecessry to suo is oto to Cotue. herere, the Cou will deResoets oto to eoe

Fuher, te Resoet ers to e gug that OBre ws eectve his reesetato o Resodet Respoets Moto he states, Resodetmts that r. Orie eie asked h wh he/s w ha led to schede aoitmet to e a iigt vs etto o gave hm te ooui to ex theses r hs ure to the Court. oto to Reoe at 3.

The Uited tates Court of Apeas te Sxth Circut s recogzed thth Amedmet gutees of due rocess eted to aes i eoato roceedgsetitg the to l a ir herg" coeu v IN, 339 F3d 47, 43 (6th Cr23) Ieective assstce of couse viotes a les de ocess ghts. Hmd v.Ashco 336 F.3d 465468 (6th ir. 23) I oder to prove deal of de rocess,e le ust estlish that the ieective ssistce of cousel resuted rejuice or ade�l of deta iess Sco 33 Fd at 43 33 3d at 48Sted ote way eectve sistace of cousel w se to the leve of a hAmedet due rocess violto oy f the oceedg as so undetally u

ht e e ws eee easoay eseig hs cse" Deko v. I 351F. 717 723 6th C 23); Mte oLozd 19 &N ec. 637 638 (IA 1988). Isdeg weter e e ws redce te Ccu scts t e Coshoud evuate ether te es cms cou hve spoe deet outcome." o Gonzles 434 3 857, 864 (6t Cr 26)

Me o ozd te A mdated tat dtio to estshg eudce,the e ust aso coy wt ce ocedr ctos. ozd 9 I& Dec. t 639A oto [to ree] se uo cla of eecte ssste of couse s

3

J(t

I m m i g r a n t & R e

f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e

n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r

a c . n e t



.

\.

uod an v o t gly aggved espon etg o rec . [] d sod icd m h se t eti gt w n o wh m unl . I Moe, "b

algio t o o1sel ae peee o e B cs be gas n all poi A es r e res e s sbe w hm . Fia, i er ta e usel hadg o e e voa vai h egl epnil m hl f ee coa appit ipl ar oi rgg hptat o, nt. d A w i o cl wh t ozadaqmt i r nc aia o ai. See Hamid, 36 a 9; but se w;je v. Ahcrof 350 3 528 (6 Cr 200) (berng h ih e mse bps e rs Loada eme beae heaoy ha i h ies b he fng h al a fld

t i irmet bfe o ha e , eree akedjio w he cai)

I t rse Ret s oe wh e oada odqim Resp dv dos t o e e s eevc Rsot coce 'B e to im o alegdcvs Reode a pv n ee h mpi s a O B w t pa dpli utes A Resde t ced wh ada ie o pr Mr Or t a as rpn esot c.

Ro e ein sbm Mt to Re "a al an ot v e cee r rene ata e n ha i m eremes ozaa Tfe o a n est w eeig s su Cu wl l dn ton Rp e Cu ls en acmyig e Mon Say Ro

Il. ORDER

eo ao h l ig ORDES r EEBY ENTERED:

I EREBY ORDERED a Rep' oo Rpe b DENIED

t FUTHER ORDERED t sp Emeny i t Soa DENIED

DED eJ dy te 4

4

I m m i g r a n t & R e

f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e

n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r

a c . n e t

alejandro cruz-cruz, a205 393 424 (bia dec. 23, 2015)

Documents