alameda county community development agency...stokes associates, inc. (principal: david zippin;...

ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Chris Bazar Agency Director

Albert Lopez Planning Director

224 West Winton Ave

Room 111

Hayward California

94544

phone 510 6705400

fax

5107858793

wwwacgovorgcda

AGENDA ITEM __ July 8 2008

June 16 2008

Honorable Board of Supervisors County Administration Building 1221 Oak Street Oakland CA 94612

Dear Board Members

SUBJECT AUTHORIZE AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT NO 1017 WITH JONES amp STOKES ASSOCIATES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO COMPLETE THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION OPEN SPACE AND AGRICULTURAL ELEMENTS (ROSA) OF THE GENERAL PLAN

RECOMMENDATION

Approve and authorize the President to execute an amendment to Contract No 1017 with Jones amp Stokes Associates Inc (Principal David Zippin Location Oakland) to extend the term from September 30 2008 to July 31 2009 and to increase the total contract amount by $154736 from $ 155275 to $310011 for the continuation ofprofessional services related to the Resource Conservation Open Space and Agriculture Elements (ROSA) of the General Plan and other services that would continue implementation of Measure D for the Community Development Agencys Planning Department The contract amendment would provide for planning and environmental services biological technical support to complete the final phase of the General Plan Elements

DISCUSSION

The extension of the contract provides the expertise needed to complete the final phase of ROSA These efforts help the County implement its obligation to comply with the letter and spirit of Measure D the initiative passed by the voters in 2000 and also provide an opportunity to update the Countys General Plan as mandated by state law (the Agriculture Element is not mandatory under State law nevertheless its inclusion in the General Plan illustrates the Countys commitment to local agricultural enhancement)

The tasks necessary to complete the ROSA elements and the required CEQA documents generally include

bull Updating and finalizing the working drafts of all ROSA General Plan elements bull Holding stakeholder workshops to review the working drafts of all ROSA General Plan

elements bull Finalizing the ROSA elements based on stakeholder and County comment bull Presenting the elements to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for

approval and bull Completing CEQA documentation

Board of Supervisors July 82008 Page 2

This contract amendment comes as a result of continuing community discussions and input regarding creeks and riparian corridor preservation and agricultural enhancement and related definitions The County anticipates a broad public response after the release of the public draft This input will lead to new language to be incorporated into the draft ROSA as well as the CEQA-required documentation

SUMMARY

The Community Development Agencys Planning Department previously contracted with four consultants to provide professional services in conjunction with preparation of the Resource Conservation Open Space and Agriculture Elements an update of the Alameda County General Plan in accordance with Measure D Under the initial contract and extensions the consultants compiled geographic information hydrologic and biological data providing the CDA Planning Department with technical information graphics and descriptive text for use in the ROSA document This extension is for one of the four initial consultants to complete the remaining tasks for ROSA and is an outcome of the additional wide-ranging public input received during the workshops and limited external review of the ROSA which resulted in input from citizen groups that are active in the County The continued and growing interest shown by stakeholder groups in ROSA and Measure D related documents has extended the overall project timeframe

SELECTION CRITERIA AND PROCESS

The Community Development Agency issued a Request for Proposals for this project in 2002 through the General Services Agency which handled the press advertising and the County website posting A number ofqualified responses were received Planning staffconducted interviews ofconsultants and defined a team ofthem who were the most qualified to work together to develop and complete the ROSA document There were four selected consultants with technical expertise in the areas oflocal land use issues and environmental assessment biological resources assessment and expertise in local natural resources and water resource issues as well as technical digital mapping expertise From the original group ofconsultants this consultant was chosen to extend their contract to complete the project Jones amp Stokes is subcontracting 20 ofthe contract to Lamphier-Gregory a certified SLEB provider

FINANCING

Funding for this contract is included in the 2007-2008 CDA budget There is no additional Net County Cost as a result of this action

Very trulYjrS ~-~azar irector

Community Development Agency

cc Susan Muranishi CAO Richard Conway CAO Patrick OConnell Auditor - Controller Richard E Winnie County Counsel Albert Lopez Planning Director uB Singh CDA Finance Director

Contract 1017 (C-2003-294)

Standard Agreement Amendment

Reference is made to that contract made and entered into on the 26h day of February 2002 by and between the County of Alameda and Jones amp Stokes Associates Inc

Said contract is hereby amended

The contract amount shall be increased by $15473600 from $15527500 to $31001100 and the term shall be extended by 10 months from September 302008 to July 312009 Jones amp Stokes Associates Inc shall continue to provide professional services for the Resource Conservation Open Space and Agriculture (ROSA) Elements of the Alameda County General Plan and the ROSA CEQA Compliance in accordance with the attached Jones amp Stokes Scope of Work to Complete the Update of ROSA General Plan Elements and Table I Cost Estimate to Complete the Update of ROSA General Plan Elements (revised 611108) which are incorporated herein

This amendment is effective July I 2008

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this amendment this 11 day of July 2008

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA CONTRACTOR Jones amp Stokes Associates Inc

President Board of Supervisors

268 Grand Avenue Street Address

Date Oakland CA 94610 City State Zip Code

Approved as to Form Richard E Winnie County Counsel Phone__loC-510lt)43=3--=89-6=2 _

by A~-lt------~rian E Washington ) Assistant County Counsel

By signing above signatory warrants and represents that heshe executed this Agreement in hisher authorized capacity and that by hisher signature on this Agreement heshe or the entity upon behalf of which heshe acted executed this Agreement

Scope of Work to Complete the Update of ROSA General Plan Elements This scope of work describes ICF Jones ampStokes work to assist

Alameda County with finalizing the Resource Conservation Open

Space and Agriculture (ROSA) elements of the Countys General

Plan and develop a gUidance document for County staff to apply

ROSA elements to planning decisions and provide CEQA

compliance

Phase 1 of this project was completed in early August of 2003 Major

applicable Phase 1 tasks included completion of the draft Biological

Resources Report and preliminary analysis of existing resource

protection policies Phase 2 of these projects is expected to be

completed in JUly 2009 under the proposed contract and budget

This scope of work contains the following major tasks

bull Task 1 Complete ROSA General Plan Elements

bull Task 2 Complete CEQA Compliance for ROSA Elements

Lamphier-Gregory will play an important role completing CEQA

Compliance for ROSA Lamphier-Gregory is a certified Small Local

Emerging Business (SLEB) in Alameda County This contract

ensures that at least 20 of the work will be done by Lamphiershy

Gregory to meet the SLEB requirement

Task 1 Complete ROSA General Plan Elements ICF Jones amp Stokes will assist the County in completing the ROSA

General Plan elements (Subtasks 26 and 29 of the original Scope

of Work for the project) This work will include completing the draft

elements leading stakeholder workshops for each of the three

elements creating the final elements and supporting County staff

through final adoption hearings

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes

rZOSA General Plan

ICF Jonesamp

Stokes -c------

Subtask 11 Complete Draft Elements

ICF Jones amp Stokes will assist the County in completing the draft

ROSA General Plan elements This work will include rewriting the

Introduction compiling a draft Glossary of terms implementing

revisions to the elements reconciling cross-references-which will

include developing spreadsheets listing policies and programs to

simplify cross~reference updates during the stakeholder review

process providing recommendations to the County on revisions to

and completion of figures and maps and preparing the document for

production This task inclutJes two meetings with County staff This

task continues and completes the work currently underway in Phase 2

Task 11 Deliverables

II Administrative Draft Introduction (electronic file)

III Revised Draft Introduction (electronic file)

IlII Administrative Draft Glossary (electronic file)

III Revised Draft Glossary (electronic file)

II Administrative Draft ROSA General Plan elements

(electronic file and two paper copies)

II Screencheck Draft ROSA General Plan elements


II Revised Draft ROSA General Plan elements including

list of references and acronymsabbreviations (printshy

ready electronic file)

fliI Spreadsheet of programs and policies to support

tracking of cross-references (electronic file)

III List of figures and maps to be revised or completed

(electronic file)

Task 11 Assumptions

This task assumes that the County will make substantive

policy decisions on the ROSA elements and provide explicit

direction on issues that are currently in County review

Alameda County Community Development Agency

This task assumes that the County will provide one

reconciled set of comments on each administrative or

screencheck draft document (ie Introduction Glossary

each of the ROSA General Plan elements)

This task assumes that ICF Jones amp Stokes will provide a

suggested list of terms for the Glossary and any definitions

that already appear either in the ROSA elements or in

County files and that the County will provide all other

desired terms and definitions

This task assumes that the County will complete any

revisions or additions to the figures and maps

Subtask 12 Conduct Stakeholder Workshops for Review of Draft Elements

Once the draft elements are complete ICF Jones amp Stokes will plan

organize and lead one stakeholder workshop for each of the three

elements and one joint workshop that addresses all three elements

(total of 4 workshops) The purpose of each workshop will be to

gather recommendations for revision and refinement of each

element

ICF Jones amp Stokes will consult with County staff to develop a clear

expression of the purpose of the workshops and the participants

needed to reach these objectives In order to enhance participation

by stakeholders ICF Jones amp Stokes will consult with County staff

and with key stakeholder representatives to develop the content and

the desired outcomes of the workshops On the basis of this and in

consultation with County staff ICF Jones amp Stokes will prepare draft

agendas for the workshops ICF Jones amp Stokes will also work

closely with County staff to identify prospective stakeholders to

participate in workshops for each ROSA element ICF Jones amp

Stokes will develop a potential participant list based on those

involved in earlier ROSA meetings and in similar public processes in

the County

ICF Jones amp Stokes will draft invitations for County approval and will

distribute them to invitees We will arrange and set up any necessary

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

fOSA General Plan

-ICF Joncsamp

Stokes

audio-visual equipment We will provide snacks and refreshments

appropriate for the time of day that each workshop is held

ICF Jones ampStokes will compile the Countys contact information

into a database of the stakeholder representatives participating in the

workshops maintain it and use this list for invitations and other

correspondence related to the ROSA review process

ICF Jones amp Stokes will prepare four brief Power Point

presentations accompanying sets of boards handouts and other

such materials that may be required for the workshops The

emphasis of the workshops will be on interactive discussions among

participants so the presentation will be short Each workshop will

have substantially different presentation materials Presentations will

focus on reviewing the process to date the purpose of the ROSA

element the main issues addressed in each element and the

expectations for stakeholders during the workshops

ICF Jones amp Stokes staff will distribute copies of the element(s) to be

discussed at least three weeks in advance of the stakeholder

workshop as well as any other needed workshop materials to

encourage participants to develop their comments before the

workshop This subtask assumes that at least half of the participants

(Le around eight per workshop) will receive the materials

electronically via email and the remainder will receive mailings by

mail

The project manager for the ROSA guidance document and CEQA

compliance tasks will participate with County staff in the delivery of

the presentations and will help respond to stakeholder questions

about the content of the elements the approval process

implementation of the elements and the planning regulatory and

physical environment

Three ICF Jones amp Stokes staff will attend each stakeholder

workshop A two-person ICF Jones amp Stokes team will facilitate each

of the stakeholder workshops and as mentioned above the project

manager will be present to help with delivery of the presentations

and response to questions Facilitation tasks will include the

monitoring of logistical support and of the delivery of presentation

materials welcoming participants facilitating the workshop according

Alameda County ComlTlunity Development Agency

-

to the agreed agenda creating a list of participants in the workshops

and creating a record of the workshop The record will not be a

verbatim record but rather will focus on proposed revisions to the

elements it will summarize the points discussed note the

conclusions reached and attribute comments to individuals where

possible One member of the facilitation team will facilitate the

workshops and the other member will be responsible for creating a

record of the workshop

The rCF Jones amp Stokes team will meet weekly by phone for the

three month period of the stakeholder workshop tasks County staff

will participate whenever they are available Workshops will serve to

plan stakeholder workshops and to coordinate and manage the

project

Subtask 12 Assumptions

This task assumes that approximately 15 participants will

attend each stakeholder workshop and that participants in

the element-specific workshops and the inclusive workshop

will be the same Each workshop is assumed to last for four

hours each

This task assumes there will be no more than 50 names on

the invitee list and that the contact information wilt be

provided by the County

This task assumes that the County will provide reproduction

for any hard-copy Draft Elements sent in pre-workshop

mailings

This task assumes that workshops will be held in County

facilities

This task assumes that the PowerPoint presentation

materials for the first and second series of workshops will be

substantially different from each other but that presentations

within each series will have considerable overlap This task

also assumes that presentations will be short (15 minutes or

less)

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

an fCF In(CIIhkmoBl Company

HOSA General Plan

-ICFJonesamp

Stokes

This task assumes that ICF Jones amp Stokes will prepare the

display boards from maps and graphics already created for

ROSA by ICF Jones amp Stokes the County or other

consultants

This task assumes that stakeholder workshops will be held

in County facilities

Proposed Subtask 12 Deliverables

iii Record of each stakeholder workshop as described

above

IlII Set of six display boards (two boards for each element)

to be used at all four stakeholder workshops

I1li Four PowerPoint presentations

Subtask 13 Revise and Finalize ROSA Elements As described in Subtask 12 the ICF Jones amp Stokes project

manager will attend all stakeholder review workshops and will work

with the workshop facilitators to compile revision suggestions based

on discussion in these workshops She will coordinate changes to

the elements with County staff ICF Jones amp Stokes will also edit and

format the revised ROSA Elements as needed

ICF Jones amp Stokes staff will update the Introduction based on

revisions to the elements and changes in the physical planning and

regulatory environment since the Introduction was first drafted

After the public hearings rCF Jones amp Stokes will make requested

revisions to the ROSA Elements to prepare the document for

presentation to the Board of Supervisors

Subtasllt 13 Assumptions

This subtask assumes a total of three internal ROSA team

meetings to discuss revisions (eg one meeting after the

stakeholder workshops for the individual elements one

meeting after the joint stakeholder workshop and one


meeting after the Planning Commission and Board of

Supervisors Subcommittee hearings) The project manager

will attend all of these meetings and the Principal-in-Charge

will attend the first of these meetings

This subtask also assumes that comments from the Planning

Commission and the Board of Supervisors Subcommittee

will be limited in number and extent

Proposed Subtasllt 13 Deliverables

III Revised draft of each element for submission to County

staff based on revisions from the stakeholder

workshops for each individual element (electronic file)

ID 2nd revised draft of each element for submission to

workshop participants at the joint stakeholder workshop

based on County comments (electronic file)

II 3d revised draft of each element for submission to

County staff based on revisions from the joint

stakeholder workshop (electronic file) This draft will

serve as a screencheck draft for submission at Planning

Commission and Board of Supervisors Subcommittee

hearings

III Final draft of each element for submission to the Board

of Supervisors hearing based on comments received at

the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors

Subcommittee hearings

Subtask 14 Assist at Public Hearings

ICF Jones amp Stokes staff will assist the County at three public

hearings to review and adopt the final ROSA element These three

hearings are assumed to be the Planning Commission Board of

Supervisors Subcommittee and Board of Supervisors However

other public hearings could substitute for those assumed The ICF

Jones amp Stokes project manager will attend these hearings and

assist the County by making portions of the presentation and

answering questions about the elements if necessary This task

assumes that ICF Jones amp Stokes will prepare the Power Point

ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes

presentations that will be jointly made by County staff and the ICF

Jones amp Stokes project manager

Subtask 15 Create Guidance Document for Implementation of ROSA Elements

ICF Jones amp Stokes will assist the County as needed in

implementing the ROSA Element Specifically ICF Jones amp Stokes

will develop a guidance document for County Planning staff on how

to apply the ROSA elements to proposed projects

ICF Jones amp Stokes will prepare a conformity matrix or set of

matrices providing a comprehensive listing of all ROSA policies

categorized by element with a commentary on how each policy is

intended to be implemented This includes a description of the

implementation tools that are to be used for each policy such as

zoning subdivision regulations specific plan capital improvements

building codes redevelopment acquisitions or easements The

matrix will also indicate ROSA policies that are directory (shall)

versus those that are recommended (shoUld) The ROSA

Conformity Matrix will be a working document that helps County

planners to determine which ROSA policies could apply to a

proposed project

The Conformity Matrix will be developed as a reproducible document

that can be used as a checklist during project review The matrix will

allow County planners to clearly and quickly identify policies

appropriate for each project type This will support efficient

development of conditions of project approval and contribute to

environmental analysis for each project (ie CEQA land use

conformity analysis)

ICF Jones amp Stokes will prepare a Guidance Report for ROSA

Implementation The Guidance Report will be used in conjunction

with the Conformity Matrix to clearly explain the types of projects and

under what circumstances the ROSA policies are to be applied The

Guidance Report will include an introduction summary of the ROSA

elements implementation guidance and relationship to other County

planning efforts The Report will contain a master version of the

Conformity Matrix The Report will also recommend potential tools

Alameda County Community Development A~Jency

-ICF Jonesamp Stokes

and approaches for new implementation programs designed to

achieve broad ROSA policies The Report will use terminology as it

is defined in the ROSA Elements glossary and will refer the reader

to that glossary

ICF Jones amp Stokes will incorporate Alameda Countys comments

into a final version of the Guidance Report If necessary we will

meet with Alameda County staff to review the Administrative Draft

Report discuss the Countys comments and determine an approach

to Report revisions


ICF Jones amp Stokes assumes that all County comments on

the draft implementation report and draft conformity matrix

will be provided in one reconciled set

Task 15 Oeliverables

III Draft ROSA Conformity Matrix (digital file)

III Administrative Draft Guidance Report (5 paper copies

andor digital file)

IlIl Public Draft Guidance Report (digital file)

Task 2 Complete CEQA Compliance for ROSA Elements ICF Jones amp Stokes together with Lamphier-Gregory will assist the

County in completing the appropriate documentation for compliance

with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) consistent

with Subtask 33 of the Countys Overall Scope of Work This scope

assumes that an Initial Study (IS)Mitigated Negative Declaration

(MND) will be prepared

We assume that an ISNO or ISMND will fully disclose the

environmental impacts of the ROSA element updates However the

first task will be to confirm this assumption by conducting a

preliminary assessment of the CEQA checklist to determine whether

significant impacts are likely or public controversy is sufficient to

warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

The Draft ISMND will include an introduction the project description

the IS Checklist (including all revisions requested by the County)

and proposed findings that all potentially significant impacts of the

project can be reduced to less than significant

ICF Jones amp Stokes will work closely with the Alameda County

project manager to prepare an accurate and thorough project

description for the ROSA element updates The project description

will describe the extent of policy revision background information

and timing of policy implementation associated with the ROSA

elements

Following completion of the project description ICF Jones amp Stokes

and Lamphier-Gregory will prepare the IS Checklist The IS Checklist

will address each of the topics indicated in the environmental

checklist in the CEQA Guidelines (Appendix G) Each topic area will

include a discussion of the criteria for determining significance of an

impact impact assessment and mitigation measures jf needed

As the analysis is being conducted ICF Jones amp Stokes will keep the

Countys project manager informed regarding the status and

conclusions of the impact assessment If significant impacts are

identified the project team will propose mitigation measures to

reduce those impacts to a less-than-significant level We will develop

enforceable mitigation that can be readily incorporated into a

mitigation reporting and monitoring plan

ICF Jones amp Stokes staff will submit the Administrative Draft ISMND

to the County for review and if necessary will meet with Alameda

County staff to review the Administrative Draft ISMND discuss the

Countys comments and determine an approach to ISMND

revisions ICF Jones amp Stokes will incorporate Alameda Countys

comments into a final public version of the ISMND

Once the ISMND is complete ICF Jones amp Stokes will file

necessary notices with the State Clearinghouse the County Clerk

and the local newspaper and will mail 15 copies of the ISMND to

the State Clearinghouse

Following a 3D-day public review period for agency and public

review ICF Jones amp Stokes will assist Alameda County in reviewing

Alameda COlirity Community Development Agency

and considering agency and public comments on the ISMND ICF

Jones amp Stokes will prepare the administrative record on how agency

and public comments were considered by Alameda County If

necessary we will meet with Alameda County staff to review the

comments and determine an approach to responses

After public comments are addressed Alameda County Supervisors

can consider and adopt the MND ICF Jones amp Stokes will then file

the Notice of Determination (NOD) with the State Clearinghouse and

the County Clerk

Alameda County must adopt a mitigation reporting and monitoring

plan (MMRP) upon adopting the ROSA General Plan Elements ICF

Jones amp Stokes will prepare an MMRP that describes the mitigation

measures how the measures will be implemented who will be

responsible for implementing the measures and performance

standards to be used

Tasllt 2 Assumptions

This scope assumes that the IS Checklist will be drafted

based on existing data sources and that the analysis will not

require an extensive collection effort or new field surveys

ICF Jones amp Stokes assumes that all comments on the

Administrative Draft IS Checklist will be provided in one

reconciled set and that all comments on the Administrative

Draft ISMND will be provided in one reconciled set

This scope assumes that Alameda County will submit the

appropriate number of public Draft ISMND copies to ICF

Jones amp Stokes for distribution to interested parties for their

review as well as 15 copies for ICF Jones amp Stokes to

submit to the State Clearinghouse

This scope assumes that Alameda County will be

responsible for filing and DFG review fees associated with

the NOD

We assume that the MMRP would be prepared based on

final mitigation adopted in the ISMND however an

Administrative Draft MMRP could also be submitted with the

raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes

Administrative Draft ISMND at the Countys discretion In

that situation ICF Jones amp Stokes would revise the

Administrative Draft MMRP if any changes are made to the

mitigation measures as a result of public review

Task 2 Deliverables

IllI Draft Project Description (digital file)

ID Draft Initial Study Checklist (digital file)

Ill Administrative Draft ISMND (5 paper copies andor

digital file)

IIj Public Draft ISMND (digital file)

Ill Notice of Intent distributed to appropriate parties and

published in the local newspaper

III Responses to Comments prepared for administrative

record (digital file)

R Notice of Determination distributed to appropriate

parties

III Administrative Draft MMRP (5 paper copies andor

digital file)

jga Public Draft MMRP (digital file)

Cost Estimate The estimated cost for this work is $154736 Allocation by task is

provided in the attached budget This cost estimate is valid for 90

days from the date of this proposal

i Alarneda County Con)lnunity Developll1ent A~Jency

Table 1 Cost Estimate to Complete the Update of ROSA General Plan Elements

Subcontnlctor Production Staff

Lampruer

Consulting Staff

GregoryEmployee Name I ZLPPrl D Roberts 0 Stewart R Dewar N Rivas~la~ A Rahnug T Haut-er S MesSlCk T Glendening P

DlrettAUOC SI CCl1sul1 Sr CotIsull Sr Consult As$OC I I I I leiJ~ Pub Task JampS label Classi6cdtltn 1 Proj Dir Cons)t II I Tec~ Dir Te~ OIl I It Consult III S COlsult I Subtotal SIbtolar E~tor Spec I Subtotal I Lacor To~al ExpeltIses ITela Price

Task 1 Complete ROSA Genetal Plan Elements SO SO SO SO

5250

52100~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~ti~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~i~ ~~[~II~[II~~~ H~~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~H~ Task loS Relse ctO~ Flnalie Drat EIlmen~s iO CO 10 Si4JOO SO 20 20 S3200 S17500 5200

570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250

Tak 2 Complete CEQA Compliance tor R05A Element 20 60 50 12 24 38 10 0 _~~l~Q 522000 bullbullbullbull~~f9~ 40 45 bullbull~~9Q _bull ~_2_~

~~~~~~~~_~~~il~~~~~t~OP~~~~~~~[ltI~~ 1~~bullq~ ~l __ qbullbullbullbullbull~bullbullbullbullbullbullbull ) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbull~fll S1Qi~ bullbullbull _~lQflll bullbullbullbull~9_ ~ _~~~9Qbullbull ~~3ql1 5375

To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95

ICF Jc~s3lt Stolte5 DUng rates S200 S110 5130 5200 5200 5130 5140 S120 Sj30 $80 sao

Subolals I 512000 538940 513000 516000 56400 53120 5320 53600 51300 I 599680 I 532000 I 532000 I 56400 57600 I 514000 I 5145680

Direct Expense5

Marlt up on aU non-labor costs and subcorfcactors 10 53525

DIrect expense sublotal 55770

SUBTOTAL 5152450

Escalation fer 50~1 of WC1k 10 be completed In oear 2009 300 52287

Total price S154736

Ibl pnnkd bIIJ211l15 Inn -M pprord b~ fn1~c $h CCD_ROSA_GP_Clgtsf_Rmiddot_1l611IlX(hnl

Board of Supervisors July 82008

This contract amendment comes as a result of continuing community discussions and input regarding creeks and riparian corridor preservation and agricultural enhancement and related definitions The County anticipates a broad public response after the release of the public draft This input will lead to new language to be incorporated into the draft ROSA as well as the CEQA-required documentation

SUMMARY

The Community Development Agencys Planning Department previously contracted with four consultants to provide professional services in conjunction with preparation of the Resource Conservation Open Space and Agriculture Elements an update of the Alameda County General Plan in accordance with Measure D Under the initial contract and extensions the consultants compiled geographic information hydrologic and biological data providing the CDA Planning Department with technical information graphics and descriptive text for use in the ROSA document This extension is for one of the four initial consultants to complete the remaining tasks for ROSA and is an outcome of the additional wide-ranging public input received during the workshops and limited external review of the ROSA which resulted in input from citizen groups that are active in the County The continued and growing interest shown by stakeholder groups in ROSA and Measure D related documents has extended the overall project timeframe

SELECTION CRITERIA AND PROCESS

The Community Development Agency issued a Request for Proposals for this project in 2002 through the General Services Agency which handled the press advertising and the County website posting A number ofqualified responses were received Planning staffconducted interviews ofconsultants and defined a team ofthem who were the most qualified to work together to develop and complete the ROSA document There were four selected consultants with technical expertise in the areas oflocal land use issues and environmental assessment biological resources assessment and expertise in local natural resources and water resource issues as well as technical digital mapping expertise From the original group ofconsultants this consultant was chosen to extend their contract to complete the project Jones amp Stokes is subcontracting 20 ofthe contract to Lamphier-Gregory a certified SLEB provider

FINANCING

Funding for this contract is included in the 2007-2008 CDA budget There is no additional Net County Cost as a result of this action

Very trulYjrS ~-~azar irector

Community Development Agency

cc Susan Muranishi CAO Richard Conway CAO Patrick OConnell Auditor - Controller Richard E Winnie County Counsel Albert Lopez Planning Director uB Singh CDA Finance Director

Contract 1017 (C-2003-294)



















compliance




















-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes

rZOSA General Plan

ICF Jonesamp

Stokes -c------



























(electronic file)

Task 11 Assumptions






















element













the County



ICF Jonesamp Stokes

fOSA General Plan

-ICF Joncsamp

Stokes























mail















-













project






hours each






mailings


facilities






less)

ICF Jonesamp Stokes


HOSA General Plan

-ICFJonesamp

Stokes




consultants





above









































hearings















ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736


Contract 1017 (C-2003-294)



















compliance




















-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes

rZOSA General Plan

ICF Jonesamp

Stokes -c------



























(electronic file)

Task 11 Assumptions






















element













the County



ICF Jonesamp Stokes

fOSA General Plan

-ICF Joncsamp

Stokes























mail















-













project






hours each






mailings


facilities






less)

ICF Jonesamp Stokes


HOSA General Plan

-ICFJonesamp

Stokes




consultants





above









































hearings















ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736







compliance




















-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes

rZOSA General Plan

ICF Jonesamp

Stokes -c------



























(electronic file)

Task 11 Assumptions






















element













the County



ICF Jonesamp Stokes

fOSA General Plan

-ICF Joncsamp

Stokes























mail















-













project






hours each






mailings


facilities






less)

ICF Jonesamp Stokes


HOSA General Plan

-ICFJonesamp

Stokes




consultants





above









































hearings















ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736


ICF Jonesamp

Stokes -c------



























(electronic file)

Task 11 Assumptions






















element













the County



ICF Jonesamp Stokes

fOSA General Plan

-ICF Joncsamp

Stokes























mail















-













project






hours each






mailings


facilities






less)

ICF Jonesamp Stokes


HOSA General Plan

-ICFJonesamp

Stokes




consultants





above









































hearings















ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736



















element













the County



ICF Jonesamp Stokes

fOSA General Plan

-ICF Joncsamp

Stokes























mail















-













project






hours each






mailings


facilities






less)

ICF Jonesamp Stokes


HOSA General Plan

-ICFJonesamp

Stokes




consultants





above









































hearings















ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736


-ICF Joncsamp

Stokes























mail















-













project






hours each






mailings


facilities






less)

ICF Jonesamp Stokes


HOSA General Plan

-ICFJonesamp

Stokes




consultants





above









































hearings















ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736


-













project






hours each






mailings


facilities






less)

ICF Jonesamp Stokes


HOSA General Plan

-ICFJonesamp

Stokes




consultants





above









































hearings















ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736


-ICFJonesamp

Stokes




consultants





above









































hearings















ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736





















hearings















ICFJonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736


-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes



















proposed project





















to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736






to that glossary





to Report revisions








andor digital file)













warrant an EIR

r-OSA Genclal Plan

$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736


$L

ICF Jonesamp Stokes










elements



































the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736










the County Clerk






















the NOD




raquo

ICF Jonesamp Stokes

ROSA General Plan

-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736


-ICF Jonesamp

Stokes





Task 2 Deliverables




digital file)







parties


digital file)








Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736




Lampruer

Consulting Staff




5250


570~ I~~ ~~~~ ~~~t~ ~~~I~~f~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ iqI ~~I 1 ~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~Q 5250



To1hOUrgt 60 354 100 80 32 24 38 30 0 eo 95



Direct Expense5



SUBTOTAL 5152450


Total price S154736


alameda county community development agency...stokes associates, inc. (principal: david zippin;...

Documents