air pollution control permitting - customer overvie aesc, inc. what to expect ... will provide ......
TRANSCRIPT
Air Pollution Control Permitting -Customer Overview
Self Generation Incentive Program SeminarCHP Project Planning & PermitsMarch 11, 2003 | San Diego, CA
Presented by:
Shirley F. RiveraAlternative Energy Systems Consulting, Inc.Carlsbad, CA
2 AESC, Inc.
What to expect ...Will provide ...
❙ Perspective on CustomerRole(s)
❙ Potential Pitfalls in the AirQuality Permit Process
❙ Customer responsibilities❘ Application process❘ Compliance demonstration
❙ Question & answer
Will not provide ...❙ Details of specific
agency requirements❙ Details on vendor
equipment❙ Sample application❙ Sample APCD info
❘ Authority to Construct❘ Permit to Operate
❙ BACT evaluation
4 AESC, Inc.
Statewide: California Districts
❚ 58 Counties❚ 35 Air Districts
❙ Nonattainment Areas❙ Attainment Areas
❚ There aredifferences.❙ Fees, forms, control
requirements, processtimeframe, expediting,emission factors(criteria, air toxics), etc.
5 AESC, Inc.
Permitting: General Process
Determ ine air perm it applicability
EXEMPT
No Permit Required
SB 1298
Certification
Complete required application forms with technical information
PERMIT
Permit to Construct
Permit to Operate
Emissions Testing
Emission estimates
BACT* /controls evaluation
Air toxics impacts
*BACT – Best Available Control Technology
6 AESC, Inc.
Air Agency Permit Approval❚ Several procedural issues
❙ Application forms, application fees❙ Technical support documents to submit❙ Agency interface
❚ Agency review time; iterative❙ Agency can ask for more data❙ 3-6 months for relatively simple❙ 6-9 months for more complex
8 AESC, Inc.
Project Development & Planning
❚ The “Project Team”❙ In-house & Contract services
❚ 5 Considerations … & Air Quality❙ Project alternatives❙ Project feasibility❙ Approval requirements❙ Construction & commissioning❙ Project operations
❚ Defining the “Project”
9 AESC, Inc.
The “Project Team”
❚ Design❚ Engineering❚ System Integration❚ Construction❚ Installation❚ Operation❚ Facility
management
… includes, but not limited to,
❙ Project managers❙ Sales❙ Procurement❙ Contracts❙ Engineers❙ Financial analysts❙ Facility operators❙ Government affairs❙ Consultants
10 AESC, Inc.
The Project: 5 Considerations
❚ Projectalternatives
❚ Project feasibility❚ Approval
requirements❚ Construction &
commissioning❚ Project operations
…& Air quality❙ Agency jurisdiction❙ Size & type of
equipment❙ Location of stack(s)❙ Emissions (with &
without controls)❙ Impact to public
11 AESC, Inc.
The Project: Characteristics❚ Type of facility
❙ New or modified site (e.g., commercial, industrial)❙ Existing minor or major source (per APCD)
❚ Type and number of units at a site❙ One unit vs. multiple units; other equipment
❚ Fuel type(s)❙ Natural gas, diesel, dual fuel, waste gas
❚ Emissions Impacts❙ criteria pollutants (NOx, SOx, CO, PM10, VOC)❙ air toxics (e.g., combustion by-products)❙ Op hours: tons/year, lbs/hr, lbs/day, ppm, lb/MW-hr
13 AESC, Inc.
“Issue” & Potential Pitfalls❚ AB 3205 - K-12 within 1,000 feet of site
❙ Requires public notification❙ Additional ~45 days after draft A/C for public review
❚ Air toxics impact – Data-specific needs❙ In SDAPCD, complete ToxEval; get % VOC control❙ May require public notification or revised project
❚ Source – Agency defines certain way❙ Definition includes common control/ownership, etc.❙ May trigger complex AQ (e.g., offsets, netting,
AQIA)
14 AESC, Inc.
“Issue” & Potential Pitfalls (cont’d)
❚ Design to comply – Demonstrate BACT❙ Generally prescriptive, but APCD allows “top down”❙ Can conduct cost-effectiveness for “top-down”
❚ Emissions testing – Initial & periodic❙ SDAPCD must “test witness”, at a minimum❙ Must include in project cost & schedule
❚ Operations – Hardware/records needed❙ Monitoring equipment of some level❙ Recordkeeping, reporting, notification
16 AESC, Inc.
Air Quality Permitting & Compliance:
A “12-Step” Program
Application Process1. Application Preparation2. Pre-Application Meeting3. Responding to Agency
Data Requests4. Negotiating Permit
Conditions5. Initial Source Testing6. Facility Inspection
Compliance Demonstration7. Emission Limits8. Monitoring9. Notification10. Recordkeeping of
Operating Activities11. Reporting of Select
Operating Activities12. Emissions Source Test
17 AESC, Inc.
Application Process: 1st 6 Steps
❚ Application Preparation❚ Pre-Application Meeting❚ Responding to Agency Data Requests❚ Negotiating Permit Conditions❚ Emissions Source Testing❚ Facility Inspection
18 AESC, Inc.
Permitting: General Process
Determ ine air perm it applicability
EXEMPT
No Permit Required
SB 1298
Certification
Complete required application forms with technical information
PERMIT
Permit to Construct
Permit to Operate
Emissions Testing
Emission estimates
BACT* /controls evaluation
Air toxics impacts
*BACT – Best Available Control Technology
19 AESC, Inc.
SDAPCD: Application Content
❚ General App116❚ Supplemental❚ ToxEval❚ Checklists❚ Figures: site map,
plot plan, receptors❚ APCD fee estimate
❚ Emissions❚ Equipment info❚ Vendor info❚ Optional
❙ Regulatory info❙ AQ modeling/toxics❙ Emission calcs
www.sdapcd.co.san-diego.ca.us/permits/permits_applications.html
20 AESC, Inc.
CHP: Controlled Emissions (BACT)
❚ Gas Turbines❙ Zero NH3 Technology❙ SCR❙ CO Oxidation Catalyst❙ Combustion
Modifications❘ Dry Low NOx❘ Catalytic Combustion
❚ ReciprocatingEngines❙ Rich burn (Natural Gas)
❘ NSCR, O2 controller
❙ Lean burn (Natural Gas)❘ SCR❘ OEM
❙ Diesel gensets withultra-low sulfur fuel
❘ Possible PM filter
www.sdapcd.co.san-diego.ca.us/permits/BACTab/bact.pdf
21 AESC, Inc.
CARB SB1298 Guidance: GTs < 50 MW
2 ppm0.03 lb/MW-hr
6 ppm0.15 lb/MW-hr
5 ppm0.20 lb/MW-hr
>12 & < 50 MW
NG; S < 1 grain/100 scf
5 ppm0.1 lb/MW-hr
10 ppm0.4 lb/MW-hr
9 ppmvd0.5 lb/MW-hr
< 3 MW Waste Gas3-12 MWPollutant
--PM10
--2 ppm0.04 lb/MW-hr
VOC
--6 ppm0.2 lb/MW-hr
CO
25 ppm1.25 lb/MW-hr
5 ppm0.25 lb/MW-hr
NOx
[Reference: Guidance for Permitting of Electrical GenerationTechnologies, CARB, September 2001; see CARB website.]
www.arb.ca.gov/energy/dg/dg.htm
- For GTs in electrical generation, 3-hr rolling avg; ppm by vol. (dry) at 15% O2.- Emission levels based on most stringent level deemed BACT or on most stringent level achieved in practice given source tests.
[Reference: Guidance for Permitting of Electrical GenerationTechnologies, CARB, September 2001; see CARB website.]
www.arb.ca.gov/energy/dg/dg.htm
22 AESC, Inc.
CARB SB1298 Guidance: Recip Engines
0.02 g/bhp-hr0.06 lb/MW-hr
25 ppm; 0.15 g/bhp-hr0.5 lb/MW-hr
56 ppm; 0.6 g/bhp-hr1.9 lb/MW-hr
9 ppm; 0.15 g/bhp-hr0.5 lb/MW-hr
Fossil Fuel Waste GasPollutant
NAPM10
130 ppm; 0.6 g/bph-hr1.9 lb/MW-hr
VOC
300 ppm; 2.5 g/bhp-hr7.8 lb/MW-hr
CO
50 ppm; 0.6 g/bhp-hr1.9 lb/MW-hr
NOx
- For reciprocating engines in electrical generation; ppm by vol. (dry) at 15% O2.- Emission levels based on most stringent level deemed BACT or on most stringent level achieved in practice given source tests.
[Reference: Guidance for Permitting of Electrical GenerationTechnologies, CARB, September 2001; see CARB website.]
www.arb.ca.gov/energy/dg/dg.htm
23 AESC, Inc.
Permitting: General Process
Determine air permit applicability
EXEMPT
No Perm it Required
SB 1298
Certification
Complete required application forms with technical information
PERMIT
Perm it to Construct
Perm it to Operate
Em issions Testing
Em ission estimates
BACT* /controls evaluation
Air toxics impacts
*BACT – Best Available Control Technology
30-day APCD review for completeness
Completeness
weeks
24 AESC, Inc.
Authority/Permit to Construct
… will include, but not be limited to:
❚ SDAPCD rule requirements❚ Policy and guidance (local, state, feds)❚ Work practices to ensure compliance with
rule requirements❚ “Completion of Construction” (a.k.a. first-
fire) form to notify SDAPCD
25 AESC, Inc.
Source Testing: Initial & periodic
❚ Source Test Methods❙ Emissions Testing (i.e., select pollutants)
❚ Source Test Contractor❙ Source Test Protocol & Agency Approval❙ Certified Test Firm
❚ Conduct of Source Test❚ Source Test Results
❙ Prescriptive information needed
26 AESC, Inc.
A/C Issued
3-5 Weeks before test date,protocol to SDAPCD.
San Diego APCD: Testing
ConstructionComplete
Schedule test witness atleast 3-weeks, prior tosource test.
SDAPCD ProtocolReview and Approval
Conduct Source Test
Test results toSDAPCD
Within 30-days after test,submit results to SDAPCD.
30-D
AY
S60
-DA
YS
CLOCK START:CONSTRUCTION
COMPLETIONDATE
CRITICAL PATH:AVAILABILITY
OF SOURCETESTER & APCDTEST WITNESS
Notify Source TestFirm (Certified)
Schedule Test Date
Coordinate withFirm, APCD, Site
Coordinate withFirm and APCD
27 AESC, Inc.
Permitting: General Process
Determine air permit applicability
EXEMPT
No Perm it Required
SB 1298
Certification
Complete required application forms with technical information
PERMIT
Perm it to Construct
Perm it to Operate
Em issions Testing
Em ission estimates
BACT* /controls evaluation
Air toxics impacts
*BACT – Best Available Control Technology
30-day APCD review for completeness
Completeness
weeks
Final A/C
weeks
“First-fire”(or start-up)+ 60-daysto complete test
weeks
28 AESC, Inc.
Customer & Permitting
Application Preparation
Pre-App Meeting
Respond to Agency
Negotiate Conditions
Facility Inspection
Drawings - site planNearby residentsNearby businessesSchools < 1,000 ftStack parametersEmissions
Engine shakedownPre-test engineTest Contractor
Site compliance with conditions
Post permit at siteEngine installation
30-Day Review
Permit to Construct
Permit to Operate
Application FormsFee paymentTech Support Doc’tsEmissions, Toxics
Initial Source Testing
Customer =========> Air District
29 AESC, Inc.
Compliance Demonstration: 2nd 6 Steps
❚ Emission Limits❚ Monitoring❚ Notification❚ Recordkeeping❚ Reporting❚ Testing❚ Inspection & Maintenance
30 AESC, Inc.
Deciphering the Conditions❚ Emission Limits
❙ ppmvd, gm/bhp-hr, lb/hr, etc.
❚ Monitoring❙ visual for opacity, totalizing meter for hours, I&M log book❙ operating parameters of engine & catalyst: T, O2, A/F ratio, inlet/outlet info
❚ Recordkeeping❙ operating parameters of engine & catalyst: T, O2, A/F ratio, inlet/outlet info❙ sulfur content
❚ Reporting❙ construction completion, test protocol, test results
❚ Notification❙ breakdown reporting
❚ Source Testing❙ < 24 months, < 3 years, annual (depending on circumstances)
31 AESC, Inc.
Non-Compliance Management… NOT explicit in the SDAPCD Permit (!!!)
❚ Emergency breakdown❚ Breakdown / malfunction❚ Variance❚ Notice to Comply; Notice of Violation❚ Mutual settlement program❚ Public Compliant❚ Replacement of equipment
32 AESC, Inc.
Customer =========> Air DistrictPermit
to Construct
Permitto Operate
Annual PermitRenewal
Inspections
Breakdowns& Emergencies
Complaints& Nuisance
Emission Limits
Monitoring
Notification
Recordkeeping
Reporting
Source Testing
Post permit at site
Engine operations
I & M
APCD Fees
Completion ofpaperwork
Customer/SiteProcedures
Engine MfrProcedures
Customer & Compliance
33 AESC, Inc.
For questions or more information:
AESC, Inc.Alternative Energy Systems Consulting, Inc.
| ENERGY EFFICIENCY || RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY |
| ENGINEERING & CONSULTING |
Shirley F. [email protected]
Tel: 760-431-4365 | Fax: 760-438-5020