aippi ip in germany and france paris, 7-8 november 2013 threee-dimensional marks contribution josé...
TRANSCRIPT
AIPPIAIPPI
IP IN GERMANY AND FRANCEIP IN GERMANY AND FRANCE
Paris, 7-8 November 2013 Paris, 7-8 November 2013
THREEE-DIMENSIONAL MARKSTHREEE-DIMENSIONAL MARKS
Contribution Contribution José MONTEIROJosé MONTEIRO
(L’Oréal)(L’Oréal)
04/19/23 1AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
04/19/23 2AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
The state of law and practice before the Directive 89/104 of
21 December 1988, to approximate the laws of the Member
States relating to trademarks
In France(Loi du 31 décembre 1964)
04/19/23 3AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
The question is whether the shape of the product per se,
or the shape of the container or the packaging, are likely to be registered as a trademark.
The issue was questionable for a certain doctrine.
04/19/23 4AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
However for the majority, the shape of a product is a material sign
capable of identifying the source of origin of the product to which it applies.
And the fact it fits into the product itself, doesn’t deprive it of this inherent dictinctive
character.
04/19/23 5AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
It is the same, and probably more surely, of the packaging
by the simple reason that if a packaging can be a protected trademark by its decoration,
it can also be a trademark because of its shape.
04/19/23 6AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
Obviously, a shape or a container, is not distinctive when it is
necessary to obtain a technical result.
04/19/23 7AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 8
DescriptionDescription Appl. Date /Appl. Date /
Reg.. NumberReg.. Number
DecisionDecision MarkMark
Boite de Boite de confiseries confiseries cylindriquecylindrique
26/01/198926/01/1989 15283191528319
CA Paris CA Paris 04/10/199004/10/1990
Flacon de Flacon de parfumparfum
23/07/198623/07/1986 13648101364810
CA Paris CA Paris 29/03/198929/03/1989
Sachet de Sachet de couleur rosecouleur rose
06/05/195906/05/1959 911 966911 966
Cass. Com. Cass. Com. 17/01/198917/01/1989
Some examples of TM that have been estimated admissible by the French Courts
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 9
784838
TGI Paris 26/04/1975
CA Nimes 12/10/1982
24/09/1991 1695187
CA Paris 13/07/1974; Cass. Com. 16/02/1976
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 10
11/03/1997 97 667 886
TGI Paris 14/01/2004
18/12/1989 1566540
CA Paris 24 février 2003
06/05/1994 94/519317
CA Paris 10/05/2002
The situation in Germany under the Warenzeichengesetz
04/19/23 11AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
Under the WZG, a trademark was understood to be a two-dimensional sign only.
In order to get trademark protection for a three-dimensional form, one had to register
a two-dimensional sign. The jurisdiction than also confirmed a likelihood of
confusion between the registered sign and the get up used by of a third party.
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 12
The shape of a product or its container could gain registration as a 3D trademark
only if it was regarded in the concerned trade circles, as sufficiently distinctive
i.e. if it had acquired a secondary meaning.
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 13
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 14
Registration no. Appl./Reg. Date Mark
DE 0109762427.11.1985/15.10.1986
DE 0094462322.08.1975/18.05.1976
DE 0048660804.05.1936/03.07.1936
DE 01128522 26.11.1987/
05.10.1988
EXAMPLES OF REGISTERED 2D SIGNSEXAMPLES OF REGISTERED 2D SIGNS
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 15
DE 0113111502.11.1988/25.11.1988
DE 0086652719.07.1968/24.02.1970
DE 00647809 25.04.1990/14.08.1991
DE 0084345826.10.1967/12.03.1968
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 16
DE 0095295706.11.1976/23.12.1976
DE 00205223025.09.1992/17.12.1993
The directive 89/104 of 21 December 1988 (now Directive 2008/95 of 22
october 2008)to approximate the laws of the Member
States relating to trademarks.
04/19/23 17AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
Preamble:
Attainment of the objectives at which the approximation of TM laws is aiming,
requires that the conditions forobtaining and continuing to hold a registered
trademark be, in general, identical in all Member States.
04/19/23 18AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
To this end, it is necessary to list examples of signs which may constitute a trademark, provided that such signs are capable of
distinguishing the goods or services of oneundertaking from those of other undertakings.
04/19/23 19AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
The grounds for refusal or invalidity concerning the trademark itself, for example, the absence
of any distinctive character or conflicts between the trademark and earlier rights,
should be listed in an exhaustive manner, even if some of these grounds are listed as an
option for the Member States.
04/19/23 20AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
Article 2Article 2Signs of which a trademark may consistSigns of which a trademark may consist
A trademark may consist of any signs capable of being represented graphically, particularly …
the shape of goods or of their packaging, provided that such signs are capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other
undertakings.
04/19/23 21AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
Article 3Grounds for refusal or invalidity
1. The following shall not be registered or, if registered, shall be liable to be declared invalid:
(a) signs which cannot constitute a trademark;(b) trademarks which are devoid of any distinctive
character;
04/19/23 22AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
e) signs which consist exclusively of:
(i) the shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves;(ii) the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result;(iii) the shape which gives substantial value to the goods;
04/19/23 23AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
The ECJ and CFI case-law and the CTM practice by the OHIM
04/19/23 24AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
The main principlesThe main principles::
1° the distinctive character of a trademark, must be assessed, firstly, by reference to the goods or services in respect of which registration has been applied for and, secondly, by reference to the perception by the relevant public, 2° The criteria for assessing the distinctive character of three-dimensional marks consisting of the shape of the product itself are not different from those applicable to other categories of trademarks.
04/19/23 25AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
3° None the less, for the purpose of applying those criteria, the relevant public's perception is not necessarily the same in the case of a 3D mark consisting of the shape of the product itself, as it is in the case of a word or figurative mark consisting of a sign which is independent from the appearance of the products.
04/19/23 26AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
Average consumers are not in the habit of making assumptions about the origin of products on the basis
of their shape or the shape of their packaging,in the absence of any graphic or word element
and it could therefore prove more difficult to establish distinctiveness in relation to such a three-
dimensional mark than in relation to a word or figurative mark.
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 27
A recent application reminds and explains more than usually, these principles
CFI 28 May 2013, 28 May 2013, Case T-178/11, Voss of Case T-178/11, Voss of
Norway Norway
04/19/23 28AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
It follows from the case-law that average consumers
(buyers of alcoholic or non-alcoholic beverages throughout the EU)
do not normally choose a product or distinguish it from a competitor’s product,
merely on the basis of its design or the design of its packaging.
04/19/23 29AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
On the contrary, they look for verbal or graphic signs, words,
names, emblems, devices, images, etc., on the product or its packaging
that will inform them more reliably about the origin of such product.
04/19/23 30AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
Le Court also says that this ruling reflects the common sense the common sense
and the practical experience the practical experience as regards consumers’ behavior in respect of
most products, which entails those consumers instinctively looking for a verbal or graphic sign
on the product or its container.
04/19/23 31AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
That will tell them about the industrial or commercial origin of the product
and then using that sign in order to distinguish that product from identical products made by
other undertakings.
04/19/23 32AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
By contrast, consumers will not rely on the outline or shape
of a product or its container in order to determine its origin without having
been exposed to that outline or shape for a sufficiently long period
to have learned to recognize it ‘at a glanceat a glance’ without even needing to look for a verbal or
graphic sign (as in the case of Coca Cola bottles) ‑
.
04/19/23 33AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
That’s why the case-law dealing with the distinctive character of trademarks
consisting of the appearance of a product or its container,
says that ‘it might be more difficult to establish the distinctive character of that typology of marks than for verbal or figurative marks’.
04/19/23 34AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
It is also a well-known fact, well-known fact, for the Court,that very few products are offered on the market
without any “verbal or graphic element” to identify them.
Consumers are not, for that reason, used to choosing among unmarked products or packages.
04/19/23 35AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
Finally, branding practices are important and must be taken into consideration,
when assessing the ability of a sign to function as a trademark.
04/19/23 36AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS
And it’s time now to see with Laurence, Jochen and Ralf,
how these principles are applied and enforced by our TM Offices and the Courts.
Many thanks([email protected])
04/19/23 AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS 37