agri-environmental programs in ontario
DESCRIPTION
2010 Land Grant and Sea Grant National Water ConferenceAgri-environmental Programs in Ontario: ImprovingOur Measures of Environmental PerformanceDarryl FinniganOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural [email protected] use performance measures to gauge progress on achieving objectives. Suchmeasures are increasingly important in the public sector in order to demonstrate progressmade on government programs and initiatives.The Government of Ontario defines performance measurement as a method fordemonstrating results. The Ministry of Agriculture is particularly interested in enhancingperformance measures for agri-environmental programs. This presentation will provide asynopsis of how the Ministry is currently approaching performance measures.TRANSCRIPT
1
Agri-Environmental
Programs in OntarioImproving Our Measures of
Environmental Performance
2010 Land Grant & Sea Grant National Water Conference
February 21-25, 2010, Hilton Head
Darryl Finnigan, M.R.M., B.Sc.(Ag)
Program Analyst – Environmental ProgramsProgram Coordination, Research & PartnershipsEnvironmental Management BranchFood Safety & Environment DivisionOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs (OMAFRA)[email protected]://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/environment
2
Presentation Outline
1. Agriculture in Ontario
2. Agri-environmental programs
3. Measuring program performance
4. Learning from other jurisdictions
5. Moving forward
3
1. Agriculture in Ontario
Ontario:
• One third of world’s freshwater
• 12.9 million people
• 38% of Canada
• 5.4M in Greater Toronto
• 1,076,395 km2 (1.5x Texas)
• Most agriculture in southern part of province
• 6.0% of land used for farming
4
Top Commodities 2008*
*Based on Market Receipts, 2008 Source: http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/agriculture_summary.htm#commodities
Fruits &
Vegetables
11%
Dairy
14%
Dairy Products
14%
Tobacco
2%Eggs
2%
Other
10%
Hogs
10%
Cattle
10%
Floriculture &
Nursery
9%
Poultry
6%
Soybeans
5%
Corn
4%
Wheat
3%
5
2. Agri-environmental programs
1. Regulatory Approach
• Nutrient Management Act, 2002
• EPA, OWRA, other environmental laws etc
2. Stewardship Approach
• Best Management Practices
• Canada-Ontario Environmental Farm Plan
• OMAFRA Great Lakes Program
• OMAFRA Lake Simcoe Program
• Greenbelt Farm Stewardship
• Biogas and green energy programs
See also: http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/environment
6
• Demonstrating to Ontarians that government programs are helping achieve a cleaner environment
is a priority of the Premier
• In the 2009 Ontario Public Service Framework For
Action, Driving Change, Delivering Results report, the Secretary of Cabinet stated that
“performance measurement is critical to demonstrate
results and identify areas for improvement.”
Source: http://www.mgs.gov.on.ca
3. Measuring Program Performance
If you don't know where you're going, you might not get there
--Yogi Berra
� “Environmental targets were set …� … but the Department cannot yet measure
their achievement”Targets:
1. residual nitrogen in the soil2. risk of water contamination by nitrogen3. risk of water erosion4. emissions of greenhouse gases5. organic carbon in agricultural soil6. wildlife habitat on farmlands
Source: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_cesd_200812_03_e_31820.html#hd5e
It's déjà vu all over again (Yogi Berra)
11
Top 12 On-Farm BMPs# of Projects (based on allocations, COFSP Year One)
38
63
65
82
91
93
122
124
151
170
194
215
0 50 100 150 200
Erosion Control Structures (Riparian)
Cover Crops
Shelterbelt Establishment
Energy Conservation Measures
Product & Waste Management
Resource Planning
Improved Manure Storage and Handling
Farmyard/Horticultural Runoff Control
Water Well Management
Upland and Riparian Area Management
Improved Cropping Systems
Precision Agriculture
Total: 1829 approved projects
(Some) Outputs ...
12
... but what about Outcomes?
The challenge is with measures of environmental outcomes
• We want to be able to say, our programs worked because:
• The water is cleaner• The air is cleaner• The soil is healthier• Biodiversity is improved• Greenhouse gases were reduced
But … it’s very challenging!
• Challenges: attribution, scale, time-lag, data, modelling versus monitoring
13
Since 2005: Grant recipients must document outputs and "to the extent practicable" outcomes …
1. OUTPUTS: activities or deliverables • number of workshops• number of nutrient management plans • number of on-farm projects
2. OUTCOMES: measurable impacts or results
(short, medium, and long-term)• Increased knowledge• Documented adoption of BMPs• Documented reduction of phosphorus loading
US EPA: Outputs versus Outcomes
Source: http://yosemite.epa.gov/R10/ECOCOMM.NSF/webpage/measuring+environmental+results
14
EPA identifies the following five types or categories of performance measures:
• A project measures its Output relative to a Baseline• Outcomes flow from outputs, and are compared to Targets• Targets are pursued to realize Benchmarks
US EPA
Source: http://tinyurl.com/yf943xl
1. Baselines2. Outputs3. Outcomes4. Targets5. Benchmarks
15
4. Learning From Other Jurisdictions
Jurisdictional Scan of Agri-Environmental Performance Measures (2009/2010)
Project:
• Report on approaches to performance measures by government agencies
• Review of agri-environmental performance
measures literature
• Examine social indicators [eg. Prokopy et al, 2009, Journal of Extension]
• Apply knowledge to adjust programs (adapt)
Objectives:
To better understand performance measures by examining approaches outside of Ontario
Purpose:
16
“Performance Measures”“Environmental Indicators”
“BMP Verification”
16
17
Environmental Indicators
• Must be meaningful • Generally understandable
• Data readily available
Source: http://www.jswconline.org/content/60/1
18
Source: http://tinyurl.com/ygfkwna
OECD
19
Environmental Indicators
Outcome 4: Environmental cost of the food
chainHeadline
> H4a River water quality: nitrate and phosphate levels in rivers> H4b Greenhouse gas emissions
Core> 4.01 Fertiliser use> 4.02 River water quality
> 4.03 Pesticide use> 4.04 Pollution incidents
> 4.05 Waste> 4.06 Good agricultural and environmental condition
> 4.07 Energy use> 4.08 Air quality
Source: https://statistics.defra.gov.uk/esg/indicators/default.htm
UK - DEFRA
19
20
• National Agri-Environmental Health Analysis and Reporting Program (NAHARP)
• To improve and develop a suite of agri-environmental indicators to assess and report on important environmental issues that the Canadian agricultural sector faces
1. Environmental farm management2. Soil quality3. Water quality4. Air quality5. Biodiversity6. Food and beverage industry
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Source: http://www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/display-afficher.do?id=1181580464260&lang=eng
21
22
• National Agri-Environmental Standards Initiative (NAESI) [2004-2008]
• Establish non-regulatory national environmental performance standards
• Ideal Performance Standards
• Achievable Performance Standards
• Watershed Evaluation of BMPs (WEBs) information from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Source: http://www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/display-afficher.do?id=1209128121608&lang=eng
Environment Canada
23
• Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP)• National and Watershed Studies• Quantify natural resources effects of conservation practices
Source: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/NRI/ceap/
USDA
Source: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/new_csp/perform.html
24
25
28
• Many challenges: Attribution, Scale, Time-lag, Data, Modelling versus monitoring
• Need to coordinate and enhance output measures to move toward outcome measures
• Learn from measures and adjust programs (adapt)
• Enhance use of national indicators at regional scales
• Learn from other jurisdictions
• Move toward a more comprehensive framework
of performance measures
• “Tell the story” to demonstrate results
Moving Forward …