agri benchmark organic an approach to understand and...

6
1 agri benchmark ORGANIC an approach to understand and compare organic farming systems world-wide International Conference on Sustainable Development of Natural Resources in Africa, Ghana, 5 - 7 December 2011 Jürn Sanders, Gerold Rahman Institute of Farm Economics Institute of Organic Farming 2 Sanders/Rahmann 1. Why do we need to compare organic systems world-wide? 2. What is agri benchmark? 3. Establishment of agri benchmark ORGANIC – step by step Contents 3 Sanders/Rahmann Why do we need to compare organic systems? 4 Sanders/Rahmann Growth of the global organic area and market for organic food and drinks, 2000-2008 Source: Own presentation based on IFOAM / FIBL (2011) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Area (million hectares) Revenues (billion US$) Organic Area Revenues 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 5 Sanders/Rahmann To sum up ! Organic supply and demand is growing international trade / quality standards / competitiveness are becoming more important ! General information on organic farming available FiBL/IFOAM: World of Organic ! BUT – There is a lack of detailed information on production structures economic performances processing and trade at global scale 6 Sanders/Rahmann What is agri benchmark?

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    agri benchmark ORGANIC an approach to understand and compare organic farming systems world-wide

    International Conference on Sustainable Development of Natural Resources in Africa, Ghana, 5 - 7 December 2011

    Jürn Sanders, Gerold Rahman Institute of Farm Economics Institute of Organic Farming

    2 Sanders/Rahmann

    1.  Why do we need to compare organic systems world-wide? 2. What is agri benchmark?

    3.  Establishment of agri benchmark ORGANIC – step by step

    Contents

    3 Sanders/Rahmann

    Why do we need to compare organic systems?

    4 Sanders/Rahmann

    Growth of the global organic area and market for organic food and drinks, 2000-2008

    Source: Own presentation based on IFOAM / FIBL (2011)

    2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Are

    a (m

    illio

    n he

    ctar

    es)

    Rev

    enue

    s (b

    illio

    n U

    S$)

    Organic Area

    Revenues

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    5 Sanders/Rahmann

    To sum up

    ! Organic supply and demand is growing → international trade / quality standards / competitiveness are

    becoming more important

    ! General information on organic farming available → FiBL/IFOAM: World of Organic

    !  BUT – There is a lack of detailed information on  production structures  economic performances  processing and trade

    at global scale

    6 Sanders/Rahmann

    What is agri benchmark?

  • 2

    7 Sanders/Rahmann

    Key characteristics

    !  International network of agricultural economists, advisors, producers and specialists in key sectors

    !  Internationally standardised methods to analyse farms

    !  Combination of farm-level knowledge, international commodity markets and value chains

    !  “You put your country in and get the world back”

    8 Sanders/Rahmann

    Countries in the agri benchmark Cash Crop Network

    Countries participating in agri benchmark Cash Crop

    Priorities for new countries

    Crops in the comparison: Corn Soybeans Wheat Sugar beet Rice Rapeseed Oats Rye (Malting) barley Sunflower Sorghum Cotton Peas Beans Palm oil Pipeline: Sugar Cane

    9 Sanders/Rahmann

    Countries in the agri benchmark Beef & Sheep Network

    Participating countries 2011

    Participating countries with national networks

    Participating countries with national networks based on agri benchmark

    Contacts for further growth

    Countries with sheep analysis

    10 Sanders/Rahmann

    Establishment of further agri benchmark branches

    Commodity related   Dairy   Pig and poultry   Horticulture

    Farming system related   Organic farming

    11 Sanders/Rahmann

    Establishment of agri benchmark ORGANIC – step by step

    12 Sanders/Rahmann

    Approach

    First step:

    Description of the organic sector

    Second step:

    Comparison of production costs

    Third step: Comparison of ecological parameter (e.g. GHG emission, soil quality)

  • 3

    13 Sanders/Rahmann

    Step 1 - Description of the organic sector Country profile

    !  Area under organic management !  Number of organic farms !  Production structure (e.g. farm size, land use, crop rotation) !  Number of farm animals per livestock category !  Production techniques (e.g. pasture, silage, feedlot, cut&carry for

    beef cattle) !  Physical performances / Yields !  Farm gate and consumer prices !  Processing and trade structure !  Import and export !  Production and certification requirements

    14 Sanders/Rahmann

    Overview of ecological indicators Indikators Environmental areas

    1 Nitrogen saldo + + ++ ++ +

    2 Phosphorous saldo ++ ++ ++ +

    3 Organic matter level ++ + +

    4 Energy efficiency ++ +

    5 Greenhouse gase emission ++

    6 Soil compaction ++

    7 Biodiversity potential ++

    8 Soil erosion ++ +

    9 Pesticid intensity + ++

    10 Landscape protection ++

    Bio

    dive

    rsity

    Air

    Wat

    er

    Soi

    l

    Res

    sour

    ces

    15 Sanders/Rahmann

    Organic farms

    Conventionell farms

    Experimental stations

    Example: sustainable indicators for German organic and conventional farms

    Gefördert durch die Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung und das Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut

    16 Sanders/Rahmann

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    30000

    35000

    1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50 5,00 5,50 6,00

    Nutzungsdauer [a]

    Lebe

    nsle

    istu

    ng [k

    g*Ku

    h-1 ]

    Ökol. Betriebe Süd (6) Konv. Betriebe Süd (5) Ökol. Betriebe West (6) Konv. Betriebe West (5)

    Ökol. Betriebe Ost (2) Konv. Betriebe Ost (4) Ökol. Betriebe Nord (2) Konv. Betriebe Nord (2)

    Milk yield per cow life

    Years of lactation

    Milk

    yie

    lds

    per c

    ow li

    fe (k

    g)

    Organic cows

    Organic cows

    Organic cows

    Organic cows

    Conventional cows Conventional cows

    Conventional cows Conventional cows

    17 Sanders/Rahmann

    Biodiversity

    !

    Num

    ber f

    lora

    spe

    cies

    Organic Conventional

    18 Sanders/Rahmann

    Energy input and –output of a farm ha-1

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    Energie-Input [GJ ha-1 a-1]

    Net

    to-E

    nerg

    ieou

    tput

    [GJ

    ha-1

    a-1

    ]

    PB öko.

    PB konv.

    Organic Conv.

    Energy input (GJ ha-1 a-1)

    Ene

    rgy

    oupu

    t (G

    J ha

    -1 a

    -1)

  • 4

    19 Sanders/Rahmann

    GHG emission per ha and year

    -1000

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    Energie-Input [GJ ha-1 a-1]

    THG-

    Emiss

    ionen

    [kg C

    O 2 eq

    ha-1

    a-1 ]

    PB öko. PB konv.G

    HG

    em

    issi

    ons

    (CO

    2eq

    ha-1

    a-1

    )

    20 Sanders/Rahmann

    C sequestion in the soil (CO2 sink)

    conventional organic

    21 Sanders/Rahmann

    increasing emissions

    GHG emission from conventional and organic farms (20:20) per ton of wheat and crop rotations

    Wheat conv.

    Wheat org.

    Crop rotation conv.

    Crop rotation org.

    (Heißenhuber 2008)

    22 Sanders/Rahmann

    Visualisation of nutrient cycles (Bavaria; Hülsbergen 2008)

    23 Sanders/Rahmann

    Summary and outlook

    24 Sanders/Rahmann

    What agri benchmark is bringing to the table

    1.  National and local capacity building through

    –""trainings –""joint data collection / focus group discussions – joint research projects.

    2.  Exposure of national experts to global developments: creates ability to judge external impacts; allows to built own networks.

    3.  A lasting national infrastructure of experts, farmers (groups) and advisors (if any).

    4.  Make transparent natural, political and economic framework conditions and use of technologies and their impact on farmers decisions and production/income.

    5.  Creation of time series: demonstrate how production systems evolve over time.

  • 5

    25 Sanders/Rahmann

    Headquator Institut für Betriebswirtschaft Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI) Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig Germany

    Contact

    Jürn Sanders Tel.: +49-531-596-5123 Fax: +49-531-596-5199 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.agribenchmark.org

    www.vti.bund.de

    agri benchmark - passionate about facts

    Source: www.oekolandbau.de / Copyright BLE 26 Sanders/Rahmann

    Mission statement

    agri benchmark – understanding agriculture worldwide agri benchmark is a global, non-profit network of agricultural economists, advisors, producers and specialists in key sectors of agricultural the value chains. We use internationally standardised methods to analyse farms, production systems and their profitability. Our farm-level knowledge is combined with analysis of international commodity markets and value chains. In this way we are able to provide scientifically consistent and soundly based answers on strategic issues to decision makers in policy, agriculture and agribusiness.

    27 Sanders/Rahmann

    Step 2 - Comparison of production costs The data and the methods

    ! Typical farms representing majority of production in important regions (e.g. typical organic dairy or beef farm)

    ! Typical production systems = prevailing

    ! Harmonised selection of regions, farming systems, data collection and processing (standard operating procedure)

    ! Feedback with advisors and producers

    ! Detailed production systems and economic / financial data

    ! Whole farm data and allocation of costs to enterprises

    ! Consistent data sets and comparability of results 28 Sanders/Rahmann Source: agri benchmark

    Pasture Silage Feedlot Cut & Carry

    Feed % in > 30% > 30% > 50% grains > 30%dry matter pasture silage and and other freshly cut grass

    other forages energy feed & other vegetation

    Management/ Outdoor Closed or semi- Confined, large, Mix of pens and Housing year round or open barns with open pens, grazing of paths System part of the year slatted floors partially with and paddies

    and/or straw bedding sun-covers

    Extent of Low Medium High Low purchase feed

    Type of animals Mainly steers Mainly bulls Mainly steers Mainly bulls(and heifers) (and heifers) (and heifers) (and heifers)

    Main locations Southern Europe, North America, Asia and AfricaHemisphere, China, Australia, Italy,Ireland, UK increasingly Spain, South Africa,

    South America incr. South America

    Farm sizes Small to large Medium Large Small1,000-50,000 headone time capacity

    Step 2 - Comparison of production costs / Example beef Production systems– feeding and management

    29 Sanders/Rahmann

    Step 2 - Comparison of production costs / Example beef Total cost by production systems 2010

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    UA-

    275

    BR-6

    00B

    BR-6

    00BR

    -340

    CO

    -160

    BR-2

    40AR

    -600

    AU-3

    10BR

    -140

    AR-5

    50C

    O-1

    30C

    O-3

    50AU

    -540

    ID-1

    00AU

    -450

    UK-

    35C

    O-4

    5U

    K-80

    UA-

    5600

    CN

    -300

    DE-

    285

    DE-

    525T

    AR-1

    200

    PL-3

    0D

    E-28

    0U

    K-90

    PL-1

    2D

    E-23

    0FR

    -200

    SE-2

    10FR

    -90B

    AT17

    5TC

    Z-50

    0FR

    -60

    AT-1

    20FR

    -70

    UK-

    98AT

    -35

    SE-1

    00D

    E-80

    0N

    O-1

    7AT

    -25F

    NO

    -60

    CO

    -800

    PE-1

    700

    MX-

    1500

    US-

    75K

    AU-2

    7KAR

    -40K

    BR-1

    550

    AU-4

    5KU

    S-72

    00AU

    -15K

    ZA-7

    5KC

    A-96

    00ZA

    -300

    0ES

    -550

    0ES

    -440

    CN

    -200

    0IT

    -288

    0TIT

    -910

    ES-6

    00C

    N-9

    40

    Total capital cost Total land cost Total labour cost Other non-factor costs Feed Animal purchases

    US$ per 100 kg carcass weight sold

    Pasture

    Feedlot

    Silage

    Source: agri benchmark 30 Sanders/Rahmann

    Annex

  • 6

    31 Sanders/Rahmann

    Share of organic area in total UAA, 2009

    Source: Own presentation based on IFOAM / FIBL (2011)

    % < 0.5

    0.5 - < 1.0 1.0 - < 2.0

    > 2.0

    32 Sanders/Rahmann

    Estimated value of exports of organic food and drinks in selected countries, 2009

    Source: Own presentation based on IFOAM / FIBL (2011)

    Aus

    tral

    ia1)

    Aus

    tria

    Bol

    ivia

    Can

    ada

    Cos

    ta R

    ica

    Cro

    atia

    Cze

    ch R

    epub

    lic

    Den

    mar

    k Fa

    lkla

    nd

    Finl

    and

    Hun

    gary

    In

    dia

    Mex

    ico

    Net

    herla

    nds1

    )

    New

    Zea

    land

    Pe

    ru 0

    40 80

    120 160 200 240 280 320

    Mio

    . €

    525

    1) 2007