agenda - oki funding€¦ · kytc or odot. Øwidening/new ... freight* % truck 5 pavement or bridge...
TRANSCRIPT
Ø Ohio STBG and KY SNKØEligibility and Available FundsØApplication ØPrioritization ProcessØQuestions
Ø Transportation Alternatives ØEligibility and Available FundsØApplicationØPrioritization ProcessØQuestions
Agenda
Solicitation for Projects using STBG/SNK/TA Federal Funds for FY24
March 10, 2020
What’s New
• Minor changes to STBG and TA factors• No separate CMAQ call this year• Ohio recipients can submit up to two STBG applications and
one TA application• Includes call for KY TA. Kentucky eligible recipients can submit
up to two SNK applications and one TA application.
ØArea Development DistrictsØCitiesØCountiesØTownsØTransit AuthoritiesØPort AuthoritiesØTransportation Improvement DistrictsØOther units of government eligible to sign contracts with
KYTC or ODOT
ØWidening/new roadway
ØReconstruction, realignment, geometric improvements
ØSignalization
ØAccess management
ØSafety improvements
ØTransit capital
ØBike/pedestrian
ØIntermodal facilities/freight
ØProjects are in or consistent with the 2050 PlanØSTBG/SNK are located within the urbanized boundaryØTA can be anywhere within the regionØRoadway projects must be on FC collector or higherØApplicant provides non-federal match (at least 20%)ØProcess is a reimbursement arrangementØMaximum 2 applications per LPA for OH STBG/KY SNKØMaximum 1 application per LPA for TA
Type Area (roadways must be functionally-classified)
Eligible Phases Funding Available
Maximum Funding
Request per Application
Max Applications per Sponsor
Ohio STBG Urbanized Area PE-RWS, ROW, UTIL, CON
$30 m $6 m 2
Ohio TA OKI Planning Area PE-RWS, ROW, UTIL, CON
$2.8 m $750,000 1
Kentucky SNK Urbanized Area PE (Design), PE-RWS, ROW, UTIL, CON
$7 m $5 m 2
Kentucky TA OKI Planning Area PE (Design), PE-RWS, ROW, UTIL, CON
$800,000 $500,000 1
Planning Factors for All Projects
TotalScore
45 points 60 points
105 points
Non HighwayFreightFactor
TransitFactor
Bike/PedFactor
RoadwayFactor
Factor Metric Max Point Value
Safety* Crashes per 100 MVMT 5
Impact on Safety Qualitative based on improvement type ( Appendix A) 5
Traffic Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5
Travel Time* Travel time reliability ratio 5
Impact on Travel Time Qualitative based on improvement type 5
Freight* % Truck 5
Pavement or bridge condition
IRI * or Bridge Rating * 5
Complete Streets Viable modes in the completed project 5
Status of project Where in the PDP is the project? 5* PAA
Factor Metric Max Point Value
Project Type vehicles, fixed facility, support 5
Ridership Impact Subjective (H, M, L) 10
Impact on Safety & Security Subjective (H, M, L) 10
Time to Implementation Years (< 1, 1 to 2, 3 to 4) 5
System Impact Positive impact on system, passenger or both 5
Existing Physical Condition poor, fair, good (FTA) 10
Factor Metric Max Point Value
Safety Crashes involving bike/ped in the project area 5
Impact on Safety High, Medium, Low 5
Network Connections Regional, connection to regional or local 10
Feasibility High, moderate, marginal, not feasible 10
Existing Surface Conditions poor, fair, good/new 5
Complete Streets 1 point for each viable mode 5
Project Status Where in the PDP is the project? 5
Factor Metric Max Point Value
Modal Traffic Flow mode vol/capacity 5
Impact on Roadway Congestion
# large trucks removed from roadway
20
Impact on Safety High, Medium, Low 5
Project Status Where in the PDP is the project?
5
Reliability Estimate of impact the project will have
5
Existing Facility Conditions poor, fair, good 5
Ø Technology
Ø Environmental Justice
Ø Economic Vitality
Ø Investment/Employment Bonus
Ø Air Quality
Ø Intermodal Elements
Ø Replacement/Expansion
Ø Strategic Regional Policy Plan
Ø Local Plans
Ø Local Share
Ø History of Project Delivery
Awards points for equipment, technologies or materials that advance the state of transportation in the region.
ØConnected vehiclesØAutonomous vehiclesØOptimized systemsØAdvanced materialsØAll modes eligible
ØOverall impacts to designated Environmental Justice (EJ) communities
� Benefits – direct or indirect� Impacts – positive or negative, temporary or permanent
ØDesignated EJ Communities—Minority, Low Income, Zero-Car households, Elderly, Persons with Disabilities
ØExamples of Impacts:• Will there be any relocations?• Any changes to access?• Have any EJ issues that could result in disproportionately high or
adverse impacts been raised during public involvement?• Are there other unique factors that could pose a
disproportionately high or adverse impact?
ØGoalDemonstrate a working philosophy to ensure that whenpossible your project will NOT cause undue or a disproportionatehardship on any of the five designated communities. When that’s not possible due to scale, scope or location of the project remember to mitigate as much as possible.
Economic Vitality (5 points plus 5 point Bonus)
ØExisting EmploymentØEmployment within ½ mile bufferØOKI staff will score
ØNew Investment or New Employment Bonus Points ØDocumented new investment or new employment within project area provided by the applicant
ØReduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled
ØReduction in Vehicle Hours Traveled
ØCleaner vehicle emissions
No Reduction Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled
Reduce Vehicle Hours Traveled
Reduce Vehicle Emissions
Road resurfacing Road connector resulting in shorter route
Traffic flow improvements
Bus Replacement
Replacing existing infrastructure
New multi-use path or sidewalk (non-recreational trips)
Traffic signal interconnect
Geometric correction Multi-modal facility Intersection turn lanes, roundabouts
ØNew and direct connections between modes.
Ø i.e. between barge and railØRoadway to port
ØNew pedestrian connection to transit
ØMetropolitan Transportation Plan places emphasis on maintaining existinginfrastructure
ØRange of points available depending upon nature of the project:
• 100% Replacement
• 75% Replacement/25% Expansion
• 50% Replacement/50% Expansion
• 25% Replacement/75% Expansion
• 100% Expansion
ØMinimum 20% local match = 0 pointsØAdditional points will be awarded for applicants who
pledge more than minimum local match
History of Project Delivery} Applicants with projects behind schedule or canceled will be assessed
penalties on new applications (up to -10 points)} Projects not yet awarded for construction and listed in the current TIP
as of September 1st will be evaluated for history of project delivery.
Øwww.howdowegrow.org
ØPrimary goal being to bring about more consistency between regional long range transportation planning, and local land use planning.
ØStrategic Policy Recommendations for Transportation, Housing, Public Facilities, Natural Systems, Economic Development and Land Use
Points awarded for:Ø Projects located in/or will enhance an area with mixed land uses
Ø Projects serving brownfield or greyfield properties or areas where infrastructure is underutilized
Ø Projects for going beyond the state permitting compliance (not simply meeting) to minimize or offset/compensate for environmental impacts, including green infrastructure strategies
Ø Projects located along functionally classified major collector or higher roadway within a developed area consistent with categories T4-T6 of the Center for Applied Transect Studies SmartCode transect
Points awarded for:
ØProjects consistent with an up-to-date local comprehensive plan
ØPartial points if consistent but > 5 years old
Important points to include in the application:
Ø Reference the specific location in the Comprehensive Plan, such as page number(s), where the project is referenced/supported.
IF you are requesting consideration for another plan (corridor study, small area plan):
Ø Highlight the Public Participation process for the plan.Ø Describe the Land Use/Transportation relationship.
ØSidewalksØBike/Ped SignalsØSafe Routes for Non-DriversØTraffic CalmingØShared Use Path FacilityØLighting for SafetyØOn-road Bike Facilities
ØHistoric PreservationØEnvironmental MitigationØTurnouts, Overlooks &
Viewing AreasØVegetation ManagementsØControl Outdoor Advertising
Factor Max Point Value
Project Type 10
Safety 5
OKI Metropolitan Transportation Plan Consistency 10
Connections 10
Project Status 10
ØSidewalks and/or Crossing Improvements
ØSchool On-Site Travel Improvements
ØLighting for Safety and Security
ØBike Racks
ØProjects must be within two miles of a school
ØElementary and Middle School only eligible
Factor Max Point Value
School Travel Plan 10
Education Activities 5
Encouragement Activities 5
Enforcement Activities 5
Project Type 5
Connections 10
Projects Status 5
Factor Max Point Value
Environmental Justice 5Existing Employment 5Air Quality 10Intermodal Connections 5Replacement/Expansion 5SRPP 5Local Planning 5Local Share 10History of Project Delivery 0Technology 5Additional Funding Request 0
SRTSFactor
Planning Factors for All Projects
TotalScore
TA Factor
55 points 45 points 100 points
March 10, 2020 Program Announcement and WorkshopJune 5, 2020 Applications DueSeptember 8, 2020 Prioritization SubcommitteeSeptember 15, 2020 Prioritization Subcommittee (if needed)October 6, 2020 ICC ApprovalOctober 8, 2020 OKI Board ApprovalSpring 2021 Included in OKI TIP
ØOnline application - funding.oki.org
ØContact information
ØProject name, description, primary goal
ØCost estimates by phase
ØCertifications
ØTransportation factors
ØPlanning factors
ØAttachments (including map and cost estimate)
Review of Online Application
• funding.oki.org• Project Application Guidance Document
ØSTBG/SNKAndy Reser – [email protected]
ØTransportation AlternativesSummer Jones – [email protected]