agenda corporate governance and human resources committee - nerc.com of trustees governance...

Agenda Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee October 29, 2012 | 3:00-4:30 p.m. Eastern Conference Call Dial-In: 800-354-6885 No Pass Code Needed Introductions and Chair’s Remarks NERC Antitrust Compliance Guidelines Agenda

1. Minutes*— Approve

a. August 15, 2012 Meeting

2. Board of Trustees and Board Committees’ Self-Assessment Surveys; MRC Annual Effectiveness Survey of the Board of Trustees* — Approve

3. Proposed Amendments to Finance and Audit Committee Mandate* — Approve

4. Proposed Amendments to Standards Oversight and Technology Committee Mandate* — Approve

5. Board Compensation Study Request for Proposal* — Update

6. Savings and Investment Plan Items*

a. 2011 Year End Audit — Review

b. Plan Adminstrator Request for Proposal — Review

c. Apointment of Additional Member to Plan Committee — Approve

7. Schedule for Employee Climate Survey* — Review

8. 2012 Corporate Goals Update* — Review

9. Human Resources and Staffing/Recruiting Update* — Review

10. Next Meetings

a. December 11, 2012 – Closed Conference Call – Time TBD (Review compensation policies and plans; Plan Administrator RFP Results)

b. February 6, 2013 – Face-to-Face – San Diego, CA Adjourn into Closed Executive Session *Background materials included.

Antitrust Compliance Guidelines I. General It is NERC’s policy and practice to obey the antitrust laws and to avoid all conduct that unreasonably restrains competition. This policy requires the avoidance of any conduct that violates, or that might appear to violate, the antitrust laws. Among other things, the antitrust laws forbid any agreement between or among competitors regarding prices, availability of service, product design, terms of sale, division of markets, allocation of customers or any other activity that unreasonably restrains competition. It is the responsibility of every NERC participant and employee who may in any way affect NERC’s compliance with the antitrust laws to carry out this commitment. Antitrust laws are complex and subject to court interpretation that can vary over time and from one court to another. The purpose of these guidelines is to alert NERC participants and employees to potential antitrust problems and to set forth policies to be followed with respect to activities that may involve antitrust considerations. In some instances, the NERC policy contained in these guidelines is stricter than the applicable antitrust laws. Any NERC participant or employee who is uncertain about the legal ramifications of a particular course of conduct or who has doubts or concerns about whether NERC’s antitrust compliance policy is implicated in any situation should consult NERC’s General Counsel immediately. II. Prohibited Activities Participants in NERC activities (including those of its committees and subgroups) should refrain from the following when acting in their capacity as participants in NERC activities (e.g., at NERC meetings, conference calls and in informal discussions):

• Discussions involving pricing information, especially margin (profit) and internal cost information and participants’ expectations as to their future prices or internal costs.

• Discussions of a participant’s marketing strategies.

• Discussions regarding how customers and geographical areas are to be divided among competitors.

• Discussions concerning the exclusion of competitors from markets.

• Discussions concerning boycotting or group refusals to deal with competitors, vendors or suppliers.

NERC Antitrust Compliance Guidelines 2

• Any other matters that do not clearly fall within these guidelines should be reviewed with NERC’s General Counsel before being discussed.

III. Activities That Are Permitted From time to time decisions or actions of NERC (including those of its committees and subgroups) may have a negative impact on particular entities and thus in that sense adversely impact competition. Decisions and actions by NERC (including its committees and subgroups) should only be undertaken for the purpose of promoting and maintaining the reliability and adequacy of the bulk power system. If you do not have a legitimate purpose consistent with this objective for discussing a matter, please refrain from discussing the matter during NERC meetings and in other NERC-related communications. You should also ensure that NERC procedures, including those set forth in NERC’s Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, and Rules of Procedure are followed in conducting NERC business. In addition, all discussions in NERC meetings and other NERC-related communications should be within the scope of the mandate for or assignment to the particular NERC committee or subgroup, as well as within the scope of the published agenda for the meeting. No decisions should be made nor any actions taken in NERC activities for the purpose of giving an industry participant or group of participants a competitive advantage over other participants. In particular, decisions with respect to setting, revising, or assessing compliance with NERC reliability standards should not be influenced by anti-competitive motivations. Subject to the foregoing restrictions, participants in NERC activities may discuss:

• Reliability matters relating to the bulk power system, including operation and planning matters such as establishing or revising reliability standards, special operating procedures, operating transfer capabilities, and plans for new facilities.

• Matters relating to the impact of reliability standards for the bulk power system on electricity markets, and the impact of electricity market operations on the reliability of the bulk power system.

• Proposed filings or other communications with state or federal regulatory authorities or other governmental entities.

Matters relating to the internal governance, management and operation of NERC, such as nominations for vacant committee positions, budgeting and assessments, and employment matters; and procedural matters such as planning and scheduling meetings.

Draft Minutes — Open Session Corporate Governance and Human Resources August 15, 2012 | 7:30-8:30 a.m. Eastern Hilton Quebec 1100, Rene-Levesque Blvd East Quebec, QC Canada G1R 4P3 418-647-6500

Chair Janice Case convened a duly noticed open meeting of the Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation on August 15, 2012 at 7:30 a.m. Eastern, and a quorum was declared present. The agenda is attached as Exhibit A. Present at the meeting were: All Committee members, being Janice Case, Chair, Vicky Bailey, Tom Berry, Jan Schori and John Q. Anderson; Board members, Paul Barber, Roy Thilly, Fred Gorbet, Dave Goulding, Bruce Scherr and Ken Peterson; and NERC staff members Gerry Cauley, David Cook, Charlie Berardesco, Mike Walker, Damon Epperson, and Tina McClellan. Minutes The Committee approved the May 2, 2012 meeting minutes as presented at this meeting. Board of Trustees and Board Committees’ Self-Assessment Surveys; MRC Annual Effectiveness Survey of the Board of Trustees; Compliance and Certification Committee Survey Ms. Case reviewed the current progress on the Board and Board Committees’ Self-Assessments and the MRC Annual Effectiveness Survey, noting additional work needs to be completed based on comments from Board Committee Chairs. NERC management will review the comments and provide an updated draft for review by the Committee at its next meeting. Criteria Governing the Overall Composition of the Board of Trustees Ms. Case reported that she had been advised by the Nominating Committee that while Mr. Goulding is interested in continuing to serve on the Board, Vicky Bailey has informed the Nominating Committee that she will not seek re-election due to scheduling conflicts. Ms. Case then offered for consideration decreasing the number of independent Trustees to 10, reviewing with the Committee the background of the Board’s previous decision to increase the number of independent Trustees to 11, and opened the issue for discussion by the Committee. After discussion, and upon motion duly made by Mr. Gorbet and seconded, the Committee unanimously approved and recommended for Board approval the decrease in the number of independent Trustees to 10 independent Trustees, subject to any comments from the Member Representatives Committee at its meeting to be held later in the afternoon.

Agenda Item 1 CGHRC Meeting October 29, 2012

Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee Draft Minutes – August 15, 2012

Sarbane-Oxley Issues Mr. Berardesco reviewed NERC’s whistleblower policy, reporting that no complaints had been received since the last annual review of the policy with the Committee, and NERC’s document retention policy, noting that both policies met applicable legal requirements. He indicated that the legal staff will, in connection with next year’s annual review of these policies, undertake a best practices review. 2012 Corporate Goals Update Mr. Cauley reviewed performance through the end of June 2012 against the 2012 Corporate Goals, noting total progress for the second quarter is 45 percent of target and that emphasis continues to be on standards development and CIP initiatives. He also noted that management is working on action plans to address progress in lagging areas. The Committee requested that Mr. Cauley summarize the action plans for the Committee at its next regular meeting.

CGHRC Closed Sessions Ms. Case reported the Committee met in closed session via conference call on March 19, 2012 and reviewed NERC’s Savings and Investment Plan, noting that based on such review, the Plan continues to operate appropriately and that no changes were recommended. Ms. Case further reported that the Committee met in closed session the day prior and that four employee policies were reviewed and approved: a Travel and Expense Policy, Gift Policy, Employee Rewards and Recognition Policy, and a Relocation Policy. Additionally, the Committee approved a plan for the review of Board compensation, which will include the use of a compensation consultant to assist the Committee.

Human Resources and Staffing/Recruiting Update Mr. Epperson provided an update on current Human Resources activities and staffing/recruiting to date.

Future Meetings Ms. Case noted that the next scheduled meeting of the Committee is via conference call on October 30, 2012. Adjournment There being no further business, and upon motion duly made and seconded, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:15 a.m. local time. Submitted by,

Charles A. Berardesco Secretary

Agenda Item 2 CGHRC Meeting

October 29, 2012

Board of Trustees and Board Committees’ Self-Assessment Surveys; MRC Annual

Effectiveness Survey of the Board of Trustees Action Approve Summary Taking into account feedback from the Board, Board Committee Chairs and TalentQuest, management has revised the Self-Assessment and Effectiveness Surveys. Substantive changes from prior drafts include:

• Conversion to a 3-point rating scale of “below expectations, meets expectations, and above expectations” to ensure more consistent ratings among respondents

• Conversion of questions to “yes/no” that are binary in nature and are not measured effectively by levels

• Requiring comments for “below expectations” and “no” responses and providing opportunity for comments for other ratings

• Clarifying survey instructions to ensure respondents have a clear understanding of when to use which ratings

• Elimination of redundant questions and modification in the text of certain questions to reflect comments and further review

Management is recommending the following timeline for the 2012 Board of Trustees, Member Representatives Committee, and Board Committees’ effectiveness surveys:

• Surveys distributed by December 7, 2012

• Responses due by December 28, 2012

• Summary of results prepared by TalentQuest and provided to the Board of Trustees Chair and Committee Chairs for review by January 15, 2013

• Summary of results presented for review and discussion at February 2013 meetings Marked and cleaned copies of the proposed final survey questions are attached.

Board of Trustees/Member Representatives Committee Proposed 2012 Survey Questions Levels of Effectiveness 1 = Below Expectations (“level of performance is clearly unsatisfactory”) 2 = Meets Expectations (“meets the required standard of performance”) 3 = Above Expectations (“Far exceeds the required standard of performance”) The survey will segment those questions that are “Pass/Fail” by nature and require a “Yes/No” answer to the item. Survey will also include a prompt requiring comments for any item rated “No” in response to a “Yes/No” item or a “Below Expectations” in response to the 3-point levels of effectiveness scale. Optional comments may be provided for items rated “Yes” in response to a “Yes/No” item or “Meets Expectations or Above Expectations” on the 3-point levels of effectiveness scale.

2012 BOT & MRC Proposed Questions BOT MRC

Strategy

The Board constructively engages in furthering NERC’s mission ensuring a reliable and adequate bulk power system. X X The Board clearly supports and advocates Electric Reliability Organization model. X X The Board demonstrates understanding of the key challenges NERC faces. X X The Board effectively sets priorities through the strategic plan. X The Board takes appropriate account of the international charter of the North American bulk power system. X X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Oversight

The Board is sufficiently involved in the ERO (NERC and the Regions) annual business planning and budgeting process. X X The Board ensures that the ERO (NERC and the Regions) business plan and budget appropriately balances the cost concerns of stakeholders with the need to meet the ERO’s responsibilities. X X

The board is sufficiently involved in monitoring the corporation’s compliance with regulatory requirements and directives.

X X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Stakeholder Relations

The Board works effectively with stakeholders in the prioritization of NERC work efforts. X X The Board effectively communicates with all stakeholders. X X The Board establishes a positive and cooperative dialogue with U.S. federal and state regulators. X X The Board establishes a positive and cooperative dialogue with Canadian federal and provincial regulators. X X The Board strikes an appropriate balance between the expectations of regulators and the expectations of stakeholders. X X

Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Composition/Structure

The Board's size is appropriate and effective. X X Board members reflect broad diversity of competency strengths and professional experience. X The Board's committees have suitable mandates and membership. X The director/trustee nomination process is effective. X X New Board member orientation and education is comprehensive and meaningful. X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Board Functioning

The Chair of the Board effectively oversees and facilitates Board activities and direction. X X The Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. X X

Board agenda items appropriately reflect priorities. X X

Priority matters are placed on Board Agendas in a timely manner. X X Background information provided in support of Board agendas is appropriate X X Background information in support of agendas is provided in a timely manner. X X The allocation of time to agenda items is appropriate. X X

Challenge of management proposals is encouraged and dissenting views are considered. X X

Board members participate as equals and communicate openly. X X The Board functions and makes decisions independently of management, as appropriate. X X The Board functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group. X X The process for taking action in writing without a meeting is effective. X Minutes are a fair record of Board proceedings. X X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

NERC Management

The Board has appropriate access to management. X The Board avoids excessive involvement in detail and day-to-day management. X X The Board is sufficiently involved in ensuring a competent and well-motivated senior management. X The Board ensures proper development and succession plans are in place for the CEO and senior management. X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Other Factors

I feel I am personally making a meaningful contribution to the corporation by my attendance and participation at the Board, committee meetings, and other activities. X X I feel my peers are personally making a meaningful contribution to the corporation by their attendance and participation at the Board, committee meetings, and other activities. X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Comment [e1]: Item will be segmented to 2nd half of the survey and converted to a “Yes/No” question



Finance and Audit Committee Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions

Corporation Annual Financial Statement Review

Ensure management maintains the quality, credibility, and the objectivity of the corporation's financial reports.

Review with the external auditor any significant emerging accounting and reporting issues and their potential impact on the corporation's financial statements.

Review and approve changes in accounting policies after considering the appropriateness of such selections and changes. Review with management, the external auditor and legal counsel, the corporation’s procedures to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Review with management, the external auditor and legal counsel any significant litigation, claim, or other contingency, including tax assessments, that would have a material effect upon the financial position or operating results of the corporation, together with related financial disclosures.

Determine, based on its review and discussion thereof with management and the external auditor, whether to recommend the acceptance by the Board of the audited financial statements.

Monitoring Relationship with External Auditor

Evaluate the performance of the external auditor and reappoint or take steps to replace the external auditor.

Review and approve the auditor's estimated annual audit fees.

Meet privately with management to assess the performance of the external auditor.

Meet privately with the external auditor to ascertain the level of access and cooperation received from management during the course of the audit.

Adequacy and Integrity of Internal Accounting Controls

Follow-up performed by management with regard to any recommendations from the external auditor or the committee relating to internal accounting controls.

Annual Business Plan and Budget

Review of the annual ERO (NERC and the Regional Entities) Business Plan and Budget preparation and approval, including associated assessments, as well as any other special budget and assessments of the corporation or a Regional Entity, and such other matters as are deemed necessary.

Review and report to the Board quarterly on actual unaudited quarterly results versus approved budgets of NERC and the Regional Entities.

Other Responsibilities Review of the policies for approval of senior management expenses, including those of the chief executive officer. Review of the financial aspects of the Corporation's Form 990 prior to it being filed with the Internal Revenue Service

Review of the investment policy governing the investment of funds held by the Corporation.

Committee Functioning

The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings.

The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues.

Committee members participate as equals and communicate openly.

The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group.

Open-ended Question

Observation and Opportunities for Improvement

Corporate Governance and Human Resources Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions Committee Responsibilities

Develop criteria governing overall composition of the Board for recommendation to the Board.

Monitor the members of the Board to ensure, per bylaws, their independence and qualifications are maintained.

Develop recommendations for the Board regarding Trustee Succession Policy.

Monitor the members of the Board to ensure, per bylaws, there are no conflicts of interest.

Coordinate an annual effectiveness evaluation of the Board, its structure, and processes.

Review annually the compensation plan for members of the Board.

Review the Trustee Code of Conduct; recommending changes to the Board as appropriate.

Review the structure and mandates of the committees, recommending changes to the Board as appropriate. Review the self-assessments of the Board committees and report the results thereof to Board.

Review of the CEO’s performance andprovide feedback, as appropriate.

Review overall staffing levels and trends. Approves the hiring or promotion of senior officers. Review and approve the remuneration of all senior officers, including salaries and bonuses as recommended by the CEO. Review and approve a general salary structure for the senior officers and management of the corporation.

Review management’s plans and activities for the development and improvement of key personnel.

Review with the CEO essential elements of senior management succession planning.

Review and approve, as appropriate, an employee manual.

Recommend to the Board the appointment of Board members to each of the committees.

Effectively communicates recommendations to the Board regarding the salary and bonus of the CEO. Plan Oversight

Review significant benefit plans (including the Corporation’s retirement plans) and make recommendations and provide feedback to the Board.

Oversight of the corporation’s Savings and Investment Plan through actions it deems prudent in connection with its oversight responsibilities and otherwise consistent with applicable law. Review the corporate governance aspects of the Corporation’s Form 990 prior to it being filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Committee Functioning The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings. The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. Committee members participate as equals and communicate openly. The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group.

Open-ended Question Observation and Opportunities for Improvement

Standards Oversight and Technology Committee Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions Committee Standards Oversight Responsibilities Evaluate the strategic direction of NERC’s standards development program. Identify strategic priorities for reliability standards development. Monitor overall results, including quality and timeliness of standards development work. Assess emerging reliability risks affecting standards, making recommendations as appropriate. Monitor progress in addressing regulatory mandates and directives related to standards. Serve as the Level 2 Appeals Panel as set forth in the NERC Standard Processes Manual, Appendix 3A to the NERC Rules of Procedure. Periodically review NERC’s status with the American National Standards Institute. Review and provide oversight regarding the Corporation's long-term technology strategy and budget. Provide recommendations for action regarding the strategic direction of NERC’s standards development program to the Board and NERC Standards Committee. Provide the Board with recommendations for action on proposed NERC projects that employ new technology. Provide advice and recommendations to the Board on any standards or technical issues referred to it by the Board. Make recommendations to NERC Standards Committee and Board regarding needed improvements in the quality and timeliness of standards development work.

Committee Technology Oversight Responsibilities Annually review the resource requirements and funding for IT-related investments and costs under the company’s business plan and budget and provide recommendations to the Finance and Audit Committee and Board. Review with management company computer systems environment, security procedures, and contingency plans. Committee Functioning The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings. The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. Committee members participate as equals and communicate openly. The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group. Open-ended Question Observation and Opportunities for Improvement

Nominating Committee Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions Committee Responsibilities Communicates to all stakeholders clear process and steps in Board candidate selection. Communicates Board and MRC best practice guidelines to field candidate slate. Develops clear, relevant and complete candidate specifications. Utilizes vetting process to select qualified search consultant. Provides opportunity for full and fair evaluation of incumbents. Evaluates potential candidates thoroughly. Conduct interview(s) and final selection process. Demonstrate application of the Board composition provisions of the bylaws in making its recommendations. Demonstrate application of the Board’s Conflict of Interest policy in making its recommendations. Demonstrate application of the Trustee Succession Policy in making its recommendations.

Committee Functioning The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings. The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. Committee members have the opportunity to participate and express viewpoints openly and freely The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group.


Compliance Committee Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions

Committee Responsibilities Appropriately review violations, regardless of their status, of the most recent month, known to the Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program staff. Appropriately review the progress of individual operating entities in mitigating confirmed violations. Appropriately review the progress of regional entities in processing all allegations of violations of NERC reliability standards to ensure accordance with the NERC Rules of Procedure. Appropriately review Notice of Penalty or Sanction, Settlement Agreement, and Remedial Action Directive documents. Hears and addresses appeals of compliance violations, penalties, or sanctions. Hears and addresses appeals of findings resulting from audits of the regional entity implementation of the NERC CMEP heard by the NERC Compliance and Certification Committee. Hears and addresses challenges by candidates for inclusion on the compliance registry. Effectively oversees the filing of Notice of Penalty or Sanction, Settlement Agreement, and Remedial Action Directive documents with FERC and other governmental authorities or remand to the appropriate regional entity. Effectively oversees audits of the NERC Organization Registration and Certification Program on a three-year basis. Advise the Board on the progress of individual operating entities in mitigating confirmed violations. Recommend to the Board such actions as may further the purposes of the NERC Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program. Recommend to the Board such actions as may further the purposes of the Organization Registration and Certification Program. Committee Functioning The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings. The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. Committee members participate as equals and communicate openly. The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group.


Board of Trustees/Member Representatives Committee Proposed 2012 Survey Questions Levels of Effectiveness 1 = Below ExpectationsNeeds Prompt Attention (“level of performance is clearly unsatisfactory”) 2 = Below Expectations (“a question exists in the rater’s mind as to the level of performance”) 23 = Meets Expectations (“meets the required standard of performance”) 4 = Exceeds Expectations (“fully meets and exceeds the expected and required standard of

performance”) 35 = Above ExpectationsOutstanding (“Far exceeds the required standard of performance”) The survey will segment those questions that are “Pass/Fail” by nature and require a “Yes/No” answer to the item. Survey will also include a prompt requiring comments for any item rated “No” in response to a “Yes/No” item or a “Below Expectations” in response to the 3-point levels of effectiveness scale. Optional comments may be provided for items rated “Yes” in response to a “Yes/No” item or “Meets Expectations or Above Expectations” on the 3-point levels of effectiveness scale.

2012 BOT & MRC Proposed Questions BOT MRC

Strategy

The Board constructively engages in furthering NERC’s mission ensuring a reliable and adequate bulk power system. X X The Board clearly supports and advocates Electric Reliability Organization model. X X The Board demonstrates understanding of the key challenges NERC faces. X X The Board effectively sets priorities through the strategic plan. X The Board takes appropriate account of the international charter of the North American bulk power system. X X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Oversight

The Board is sufficiently involved in the ERO (NERC and the Regions) annual business planning and budgeting process. X X The Board ensures that the ERO (NERC and the Regions) business plan and budget appropriately balances the cost concerns of stakeholders with the need to meet the ERO’s responsibilities. X X

The board is sufficiently involved in monitoring the corporation’s compliance with regulatory requirements and directives.

X X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X Stakeholder Relations

The Board works effectively with stakeholders in the prioritization of NERC work efforts. X X The Board effectively communicates with all stakeholders. X X The Board establishes a positive and cooperative dialogue with U.S. federal and state regulators. X X The Board establishes a positive and cooperative dialogue with Canadian federal and X X

provincial regulators. The Board strikes an appropriate balance between the expectations of regulators and the expectations of stakeholders. X X The delegation of authority to the Regional Entities under the Board approved Regional Delegation Agreements is effective in terms of fulfilling the ERO’s statutory obligations and corporate objectives. X X The Board works effectively with stakeholders in the prioritization of NERC work efforts. X X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Composition/Structure

The Board's size is appropriate and effective. X X Board members reflect broad diversity of competency strengths and professional experience. X The Board's committees have suitable mandates and membership. X The director/trustee nomination process is effective. X X New Board member orientation and education is comprehensive and meaningful. X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Board Functioning

The Chair of the Board effectively oversees and facilitates Board activities and direction. X X The Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. X X The number of Board meetings is appropriate. X X Board agenda items appropriately reflect priorities. X X Priority matters are placed on Board Agendas in a timely manner. X X Background information provided in support of Board agendas is appropriate X X Background information in support of agendas is provided in a timely manner. X X The allocation of time to agenda items is appropriate. X X There is sufficient opportunity for Board Members to discuss their views before a decision is taken. X Challenge of management proposals is encouraged and dissenting views are considered. X X Board members participate as equals and communicate openly. X X The Board functions and makes decisions independently of management, as appropriate. X X The Board functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group. X X The process for taking action in writing without a meeting is effective. X Minutes are a fair record of Board proceedings. X X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

NERC Management

The Board has appropriate access to management. X The Board avoids excessive involvement in detail and day-to-day management. X X The Board is sufficiently involved in ensuring a competent and well-motivated senior management. X The Board ensures proper development and succession plans are in place for the CEO and senior management. X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X

Other Factors

Comment [e1]: Item moved to top


The amount and form of trustee compensation is appropriate in relation to Trustee responsibilities. X X I feel I am personally making a meaningful contribution to the corporation by my attendance and participation at the Board, committee meetings, and other activities. X X I feel my peers are personally making a meaningful contribution to the corporation by their attendance and participation at the Board, committee meetings, and other activities. X Observation and Opportunities for Improvement: X X Finance and Audit Committee Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions

Corporation Annual Financial Statement Review

Ensure management maintains the quality, credibility, and the objectivity of the corporation's financial reports.

Review with the external auditor any significant emerging accounting and reporting issues and their potential impact on the corporation's financial statements.

Review and approve changes in accounting policies after considering the appropriateness of such selections and changes. Review with management, the external auditor and legal counsel, the corporation’s procedures to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Review with management, the external auditor and legal counsel any significant litigation, claim, or other contingency, including tax assessments, that would have a material effect upon the financial position or operating results of the corporation, together with related financial disclosures.

Determine, based on its review and discussion thereof with management and the external auditor, whether to recommend the acceptance by the Board of the audited financial statements.

Monitoring Relationship with External Auditor

Approve the hiring of the External Auditor. Evaluate the performance of the external auditor and reappoint or take steps to replace the external auditor.

Review and approve the auditor's estimated annual audit fees.

Meet privately with management to assess the performance of the external auditor.

Meet privately with the external auditor to ascertain the level of access and cooperation received from management during the course of the audit.



Adequacy and Integrity of Internal Accounting Controls

Annually obtain a report from management assessing the Corporation’s internal accounting controls.

Review the Ffollow-up performed by management with regard to any recommendations from the external auditor or the committee relating to internal accounting controls.

Annual Business Plan and Budget Review and make recommendations to the Board with respect to of the annual ERO (NERC and the Regional Entities) Business Plan and Budget preparation and approval, including associated assessments, as well as any other special budget and assessments of the corporation or a Regional Entity, and such other matters as are deemed necessary.

Review and report to the Board quarterly on actual unaudited quarterly results versus approved budgets of NERC and the Regional Entities.

Other Responsibilities Review of the policies for approval of senior management expenses, including those of the chief executive officer. Review of the financial aspects of the Corporation's Form 990 prior to it being filed with the Internal Revenue Service Review and recommend approval by the Board of thean investment policy governing the investment of funds held by the Corporation.

Perform such other functions as may be delegated from time to time by the Board.

Committee Functioning

The number of Committee meetings is appropriate.

The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings.

The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues.

Committee members participate as equals and communicate openly.

The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group.

Open-ended Question

Observation and Opportunities for Improvement

Corporate Governance and Human Resources Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions

Committee Responsibilities

Develop criteria governing overall composition of the Board for recommendation to the Board.

Monitor the members of the Board to ensure, per bylaws, their independence and qualifications are maintained.

Develop recommendations for the Board regarding Trustee Succession Policy.

Monitor the members of the Board to ensure, per bylaws, there are no conflicts of interest.

Coordinate an annual effectiveness evaluation of the Board, its structure, and processes.

Review annually the compensation plan for members of the Board.

Periodically rReview the Trustee Code of Conduct; recommending changes to the Board as appropriate.

Review annually the structure and mandates of the committees, recommending changes to the Board as appropriate. Review the self-assessments of the Board committees and report the results thereof to Board. Works to ensure the meaningfulness of support, information, and documentation from management to the Board. Based upon regular Rreview of the CEO’s performance,performance and provides feedback, as appropriate. Review overall staffing levels and trends. Approves the hiring or promotion of senior officers. Review and approve the remuneration of all senior officers, including salaries and bonuses as recommended by the CEO. Review and approve a general salary structure for the senior officers and management of the corporation.

Review management’s plans and activities for the development and improvement of key personnel.

Review with the CEO essential elements of senior management succession planning.

Review and approve, as appropriate, an employee manual.

Recommend to the Board the appointment of Board members to each of the committees.

Based upon annual compensation plan review, mMake effective Effectively communicates recommendations to the Board regarding theincluding salary and bonus of the CEO. Perform such other functions as may be delegated from time to time by the Board.

Plan Oversight

Review all significant benefit plans (including the Corporation’s retirement plans) and make recommendations and provide feedback to the Board.

Oversightee of the corporation’s Savings and Investment Plan through actions it deems prudent in connection with its oversight responsibilities and otherwise consistent with applicable law. Review the corporate governance aspects of the Corporation’s Form 990 prior to it being filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Committee Functioning The number of Committee meetings is appropriate. The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings. The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. Committee members participate as equals and communicate openly. The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group.


Standards Oversight and Technology Committee Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions Committee Standards Oversight Responsibilities Evaluate the strategic direction of NERC’s standards development program. Identify strategic priorities for reliability standards development. Monitor overall results, including quality and timeliness of standards development work. Assess emerging reliability risks affecting standards, making recommendations as appropriate. Monitor progress in addressing regulatory mandates and directives related to standards. Serve as the Level 2 Appeals Panel as set forth in the NERC Standard Processes Manual, Appendix 3A to the NERC Rules of Procedure. Periodically review NERC’s status with the American National Standards Institute. Review and provide oversight regarding the Corporation's long-term technology strategy and budget. Provide recommendations for action regarding the strategic direction of NERC’s standards development program to the Board and NERC Standards Committee. Provide the Board with recommendations for action on proposed NERC projects that employ new technology. Provide advice and recommendations to the Board on any standards or technical issues referred to it by the Board. Make recommendations to NERC Standards Committee and Board regarding needed improvements in the quality and timeliness of standards development work.

Perform such other functions as may be delegated from time to time by the Board. Committee Technology Oversight Responsibilities Annually review the resource requirements and funding for IT-related investments and costs under the company’s business plan and budget and provide recommendations to the Finance and Audit Committee and Board. Review with management company computer systems environment, security procedures, and contingency plans. Appropriately responds to Board requests for recommendations on technology-related issues. Committee Functioning The number of Committee meetings is appropriate. The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings. The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. Committee members participate as equals and communicate openly. The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group. Open-ended Question Observation and Opportunities for Improvement

Nominating Committee Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions Committee Responsibilities Communicates to all stakeholders clear process and steps in Board candidate selection. Communicates Board and MRC best practice guidelines to field candidate slate. Develops clear, relevant and complete candidate specifications. Utilizes vetting process to select qualified search consultant. Provides opportunity for full and fair evaluation of incumbents. Evaluates potential candidates thoroughly. Conduct interview(s) and final selection process. Recommend to the Member Representatives Committee candidates for election as Trustees. Demonstrate application of the Board composition provisions of the bylaws in making its recommendations. Demonstrate application of the Board’s Conflict of Interest policy in making its recommendations. Demonstrate application of the Trustee Succession Policy in making its recommendations.

Committee Functioning The number of Committee meetings is appropriate. The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings. The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. Committee members have the opportunity to participate and express viewpoints openly and freely The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group.


Compliance Committee Proposed 2012 Self-Assessment Questions

Committee Responsibilities Appropriately review violations, regardless of their status, of the most recent month, known to the Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program staff. Appropriately review the progress of individual operating entities in mitigating confirmed violations. Appropriately review the progress of regional entities in processing all allegations of violations of NERC reliability standards to ensure accordance with the NERC Rules of Procedure. Appropriately review Notice of Penalty or Sanction, Settlement Agreement, and Remedial Action Directive documents. Hears and addresses appeals of compliance violations, penalties, or sanctions. Hears and addresses appeals of findings resulting from audits of the regional entity implementation of the NERC CMEP heard by the NERC Compliance and Certification Committee. Hears and addresses challenges by candidates for inclusion on the compliance registry. Effectively oversees the filing of Notice of Penalty or Sanction, Settlement Agreement, and Remedial Action Directive documents with FERC and other governmental authorities or remand to the appropriate regional entity. Effectively oversees audits of the NERC Organization Registration and Certification Program on a three-year basis. Report to the Board at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. Advise the Board on the progress of individual operating entities in mitigating confirmed violations. Recommend to the Board such actions as may further the purposes of the NERC Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program. Recommend to the Board such actions as may further the purposes of the Organization Registration and Certification Program. Perform such other functions as may be delegated from time to time by the Board.

Committee Functioning The number of Committee meetings is appropriate. The information provided in support of the agenda is appropriate and available in a timely manner in advance of Board meetings. The Committee Chair manages meetings efficiently to allow for sufficient discussion and constructive input on important issues. Committee members participate as equals and communicate openly. The Committee functions without giving undue influence to any single stakeholder or stakeholder group.


Board of Trustees Finance and Audit Committee Mandate Approved by Board of Trustees: August 4, 2011August ___, 2012

1. The Finance and Audit Committee (FAC) shall be composed of not less than three and not more than six trustees.

2. The members of the FAC shall be appointed or reappointed by the Board of Trustees (Board) at the

regular meeting of the board immediately following each annual meeting of the Member Representatives Committee. Each member of the FAC shall continue to be a member thereof until his/her successor is appointed, unless he/she shall resign or be removed or shall cease to be a trustee of the corporation. Where a vacancy occurs at any time in the membership of the FAC, it may be filled by the Board of Trustees. The president and chief executive officer of the corporation shall not be eligible for appointment to the FAC.

3. The Board or, in the event of their failure to do so, the members of the FAC, shall appoint a chair

from among their members. The FAC shall also appoint a secretary who need not be a trustee. 4. The place of meetings of the FAC and the procedures at such meetings shall be the same as for

regular board meetings of the corporation, or as determined by the members of the FAC, provided that:

a) A quorum for meetings shall be a majority of the number of members of the FAC.

b) The FAC shall meet as required and at least once per quarter.

5. The duties and responsibilities of the FAC include:

a) Ensuring management maintains the quality, credibility, and the objectivity of the corporation’s financial reports;

b) Satisfying itself as to the adequacy and integrity of the supporting systems of internal accounting controls;

c) Appointing, receiving reports from and monitoring the independent external auditor (auditor), who shall report to the FAC on behalf of the board for purposes of the annual independent audit and such other matters that may be assigned to the auditor from time to time;

d) Reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the annual ERO (NERC and the Regional Entities) business plan and budget preparation and approval, including associated assessments, as well as any other special budget and assessments of the corporation


Board of Trustees Finance and Audit Committee Mandate

Approved by Board of Trustees: August __, 2012 Approved: August 4, 2011

2

Formatted: Default Paragraph Font, Font:(Default) +Body, 12 pt, Do not check spelling orgrammar

Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 6.5"

Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body, Do notcheck spelling or grammar

or a regional entity, and such other matters as are deemed necessary and advisable by the FAC in connection with the preparation and approval thereof, in each case consistent with applicable requirements of the rules of procedure, applicable laws, rules, regulations and directives of governmental and regulatory authorities with jurisdiction.

6. In fulfilling these duties and responsibilities, the FAC shall:

a) Review and recommend for Board approval the corporation’s audited annual financial statements. This review will include:

• Discussing with management and the auditor the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal accounting and financial controls, including the corporation’s system for monitoring and managing business risk;

• Reviewing and discussing the audited financial statements of the corporation with management and the auditor, including their judgment about the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of the disclosures in the financial statements;

• Reviewing with management, the auditor, and legal counsel the corporation’s procedures to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and any significant litigation, claim, or other contingency, including tax assessments, that would have a material effect upon the financial position or operating results of the corporation, as well as the disclosure or impact on the results of any such matters in the annual financial statements;

• Discussing the results of the annual audit, any matters required to be communicated to the FAC by the auditor under generally accepted auditing standards, and any other matters that the auditor feels should be communicated to the FAC;

• Reviewing with the auditor any significant emerging accounting and reporting issues and their potential impact on the corporation’s financial statements; and

• Meeting with the auditor, with and without management present, to discuss the results of the annual audit.

b) Review and approve the auditor’s estimated annual audit fees and expenses.

c) Review with management all interim and unaudited financial statements prepared for external distribution and recommend acceptance of any such statements to the Board.

d) Review the financial aspects of the Corporation’s Form 990 prior to it being filed with the Internal Revenue Service.

e) Review and recommend approval by the board of an investment policy governing the investment of funds held by the Corporation.

Board of Trustees Finance and Audit Committee Mandate

Approved by Board of Trustees: August __, 2012 Approved: August 4, 2011

3

Formatted: Default Paragraph Font, Font:(Default) +Body, 12 pt, Do not check spelling orgrammar

Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 6.5"

Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body, Do notcheck spelling or grammar

f) Review and make recommendations to the board regarding management authorization to enter into loan agreements, including but not limited to lines of credit.

g) Provide oversight of management’s compliance with the corporation’s working capital and operating reserve policy and make recommendations to the board regarding expenditures or transfers of working capital and operating reserves which require board authorization as set forth in such policy.

f)h) Review policies for the approval of senior management expenses, including those of the chief executive officer.

g)i) Whenever it may be appropriate to do so, to retain and receive advice from experts, including independent legal counsel and independent public accountants, and to conduct or authorize the conduct of investigations into any matters within the scope of the responsibility of the FAC as the FAC may consider appropriate.

h)j) Review this mandate on an annual basis and recommend to the Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee any changes to this mandate that the FAC considers advisable.

i)k) Complete a self-assessment annually to determine how effectively the FAC is meeting its responsibilities.

j)l) Perform such other functions as may be delegated from time to time by the board.

Standards Oversight and Technology Committee Mandate Approved by Board of Trustees: ___________, 2012 1. The Standards Oversight and Technology Committee (SOTC) shall be composed of not less than three and not more than six members of the Board of Trustees (the Board) of the

North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC).

2. The members of the SOTC shall be appointed or reappointed by the Board at the regular Meeting of the Board immediately following each Annual Meeting of the NERC Member Representatives Committee. Each member of the SOTC shall continue to be a member thereof until his/her successor is appointed, unless he/she shall resign or be removed by the Board or shall cease to be a member of the Board. When a vacancy occurs at any time in the membership of the SOTC, it may be filled by the Board of Trustees.

3. The Board of Trustees or, in the event of their failure to do so, the members of the SOTC, shall appoint a Chair from among their members. The SOTC shall also appoint a Secretary who need not be a Trustee.

4. The place of meeting of the SOTC and the procedures at such meeting shall be the same as for regular Board meetings of the Corporation, or as determined by the Chair of the SOTC or the members of the SOTC, provided that:

(a) A quorum for meetings shall be a majority of the number of members of the SOTC.

(b) The SOTC shall meet as required and at least twice a year.

5. In connection with technology related issues, the SOTC shall:

(a) As part of the annual business plan and budgeting process, provide the Finance and Audit Committee and Board with recommendations regarding management proposed resource requirements and funding for (i) the design, procurement, installation, operation and maintain information technology hardware, software and applications, including hardware, software and applications hosted by third parties, supporting NERC’s operations and Program Area initiatives and (ii) investments in or supporting the development of new technology to improve and ensure the reliability of the bulk power system in North America, historic examples of which included funding for the development of transmission system awareness tools, synchrophaser technology, technology used to monitor and manage transmission congestion, data reporting tools providing information regarding generator, transmission system and demand side resource availability and performance.

(b) Review with management NERC’s overall computer systems environment, including procedures to keep the systems secure and contingency plans developed to deal with possible computer failures.


Standards Oversight and Technology Committee Mandate Board of Trustees Approved: __________, 2012

2

(d) Respond to the Board’s requests for advice and recommendations on any technology-related issues referred to it by the Board.

6. In connection with the standards development program, the SOTC shall:

(a) In collaboration with the NERC Reliability Issues Steering Committee, work with management to identify strategic priorities for reliability standards development and provide feedback to NERC Standards Committee, Board and management on the annual standards development work plan.

(b) Monitor overall results of the standards development process, including quality and timeliness of standards development work, and make recommendations to the NERC Standards Committee, Board and management regarding potential improvements.

(c) In collaboration with the NERC Reliability Issues Steering Committee and management, assess emerging reliability risks affecting standards and make recommendations as appropriate.

(d) Monitor progress in addressing regulatory mandates and directives related to standards.

(e) Serve as the Level 2 Appeals Panel as set forth in the NERC Standards Process Manual, Appendix 3A to the NERC Rules of Procedure.

(f) Periodically review NERC’s status with the American National Standards Institute.

(g) Respond to the Board’s requests for advice and recommendations on any standards-related referred to it by the Board.

7. The SOTC shall also:

(a) Review this mandate on an annual basis and recommend to the Board Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee any changes to it that the SOTC considers advisable.

(b) Complete a self-assessment annually to determine how effectively the SOTC is meeting its responsibilities.

(c) Perform such other functions as may be delegated from time to time by the Board.


Board Compensation Study Request for Proposal

Action None Summary Management has issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to conduct a market analysis of Board compensation. The RFP was issued to Towers Watson, Mercer, Hay Group, SMN Associates, and Spencer Stuart and is due no later than November 1, 2012. A copy of the RFP is attached for reference. Compensation Study Timeline

November 2012 Select and retain consultant and commence study

February/March 2013 Consultant report delivered

May 2013 Committee meeting

Review study results

August 2013 Board of Trustees approval of any changes to the structure and level of compensation

January 2014 Implement changes

October 2, 2012 Recipient Re: Market Analysis of Board Compensation Dear____: The Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee (CGHRC), a committee of the Board of Trustees of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), is requesting proposals to perform a market analysis of board compensation. Your firm is invited to submit a proposal as noted herein. The CGHRC is composed of independent Trustees and is responsible to annually review the compensation plan for members of the board and make recommendations as appropriate. The committee also is responsible for conducting periodic market studies regarding board compensation. The last study was conducted in April 2010. The study should, at a minimum, include the following:

1. A review of the current board compensation methodology and levels,

2. Consideration of current board and board committee activities, committee assignments, calendar of activities, and quarterly and annual workload,

3. A list of recommended peer organizations and the underlying basis for including these organizations in the peer group,

4. A summary of peer organization board compensation models, appropriate benchmarks, and competiveness percentiles,

5. A review of other compensation models to the extent not utilized by any of the recommended peer organizations,

6. Recommendations regarding an appropriate model, including consideration of both variable and retainer (fixed) payment methods, given the relative scope and role of the board and its committees, and

7. A review of current company policies regarding reimbursement of board travel expense reimbursement and recommendations regarding any changes to that policy in light of current market practices by peer organizations.

Your proposal should describe your qualifications, the staff you would use for this assignment, your ability to meet our timetable, how you plan to conduct the project, and your proposed fees, which should be in the form of a fixed or not to exceed fee for the engagement. The proposal should also include a list of recent (at least three years of information) similar projects conducted, as well as references that can be contacted. In particular, we are interested in knowing your experience with

Agenda Item 5 Attachment 1 CGHRC Meeting October 29, 2012

2

respect to prevalence and (emerging) trends in board compensation for both for profit and not-for-profit organizations. Your proposal should also anticipate time to conduct interviews and conference calls as required with the Chair of the CGHRC and make a final presentation of your findings and recommendations to the CGHRC. Our deadline for receiving the proposal is November 1, 2012

. The CGHRC or its duly authorized representatives will make the final selection based upon your proposal and an evaluation of the competitiveness of the proposed fees. The Committee plans to make the final selection in November and the selected firm should expect to conduct telephone interviews with Trustees, which would be scheduled as soon as possible. Trustee bios are made as an attachment to this letter.

The proposed timetable is as follows:

October 2012 Issue Request for Proposal (RFP) for consultant to undertake study

November 2012 Select and retain consultant and commence study

February/March 2013 Consultant report delivered

May 2013 Committee meeting Review study results

August 2013 Board of Trustees approval of any changes to the structure and level of compensation

January 2014 Implement changes

If you have questions about this request, please do not hesitate to call or email Damon Epperson at 404-446-9734 or [email protected], and please send your proposal via the same e-mail address. About NERC NERC is an international, independent, not-for-profit organization, whose mission is to ensure the reliability of the bulk power system in North America. NERC is subject to oversight by the U. S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and governmental authorities in Canada. To achieve its mission, NERC develops and enforces reliability standards, assesses adequacy annually via a 10-year forecast and winter and summer forecasts, monitors the bulk power system, analyzes system events and disturbances, and educates, trains and certifies industry personnel. More information regarding NERC is available at www.nerc.com. Sincerely, DRAFT Damon Epperson Director of Human Resources

mailto:[email protected]�

http://www.nerc.com/�

Agenda Item 6a CGHRC Meeting October 29, 2012

Review of 2011 NERC Savings and Investment Plan Audit

Action Accept the Plan Financial Statements and Audit Report as provided to the Committee. Background Due to the number of participants in NERC’s Savings and Investment Plan (“Plan”), the company is required to have the plan audited annually. NERC’s outside auditor, WeiserMazars (“Weiser”), was retained to perform the audit. A copy of the Plan financial statements, together with a summary report prepared by Weiser, is attached. As you will note, subject to the limitations of the scope of their audit, the findings by Weiser were favorable. In addition to the audit performed by Weiser, Vanguard, the Plan trustee, prepares the Annual Plan-level Financial Reporting Package which includes preliminary financial reports, supplementary financial information, the preliminary Plan tax returns (Form 5500) for filing by the company, performs annual compliance testing, and prepares the Summary Annual Report that is distributed to all participants in the plan following the filing of the Form 5500. The financial reports, supplementary information and Form 5500 are also reviewed by management and the company’s outside auditors. Vanguard’s compliance testing includes: a comparison of current year compensation to the prior year eligible compensation with explanations required for significant differences; submission of the number of hours worked to validate eligibility for the 10 percent contribution; and, a reconciliation of eligible compensation, pre-entry compensation and excluded compensation. From this data, Vanguard tests the actual match contributions and 10 percent contributions received to determine if NERC has administered the Plan properly. If there are variances between the actual contributions received and the calculated required contributions, NERC is required to explain the differences. Upon completion, Vanguard issues the ‘Final Results Letter’ that includes a summary of the Coverage and Non-Discrimination Tests and the Compliance and Plan Limit Tests, noting correction required for one (1) participant whose total contributions exceeded the IRC section 415(c)(1) Annual Additions Limit by $0.01. Corrective action was not taken because the participant had terminated and withdrawn all funds from the NERC Plan.

Plan 91529

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL June 22, 2012 Susan Turpen Controller North American Electric Reliability Corporation 3353 Peachtree Road, NE Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30326 RE: December 31, 2011 Plan Year-End Coverage, Nondiscrimination and Compliance Test Results

Plan 091529 Dear Susan Turpen: This letter summarizes the results of the December 31, 2011 plan year-end coverage, nondiscrimination, compliance and plan limit tests for the North American Electric Reliability Corporation Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”). The results are based upon data submitted by North American Electric Reliability Corporation, in conjunction with data previously provided to Vanguard’s recordkeeping system. Should you notice any data discrepancies or have any questions while reviewing the enclosed reports, please contact me immediately, as changes to data may affect the results of these tests.

Coverage and Nondiscrimination Tests – See test results provided. IRC §414(s) Compensation Ratio Test – N/A IRC §410(b) Minimum Coverage – Ratio Percentage Test Satisfied Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) – Pass Actual Contribution Percentage (ACP) – Pass

Compliance and Plan Limit Tests – See test results provided. IRC §402(g) Deferral Limit – Pass IRC §415(c)(1) Annual Additions Limit – Correction Required/ one (1) participant Pretax and/or Roth Percentage Limit – No Issues Identified After-tax Percentage Limit – N/A Combined Pretax and After-tax Percentage Limit – N/A

Sincerely,

Stacey Yoder, QKA Compliance Consultant Compliance & Annual Plan Reporting Services Phone: (800) 662-0106 x37945 Fax: (484) 582-4465 cc: Kal Muchnick

Post Office Box 2600, Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482~2600 610~669~1000 · www.vanguard.com

2

North American Electric Reliability Corporation North American Electric Reliability Corporation Savings and Investment Plan

Test Results for the Plan Year Ended December 31, 2011 IRC §414(s) Compensation Ratio Test – N/A

For the December 31, 2011 plan year-end, the Plan utilizes an IRC safe-harbor definition of Compensation; therefore, the IRC §414(s) Compensation Ratio Test was not necessary.

3

North American Electric Reliability Corporation

North American Electric Reliability Corporation Savings and Investment Plan Test Results for the Plan Year Ended December 31, 2011

Nondiscrimination and Compliance Tests – Employee Counts and Test Results

The following chart contains employee counts based on plan year-end testing information.

Employee Data ADP Count ACP Count

Ineligible 34 34 Eligible 156 156

HCE Count 23 23 NHCE Count (Over 21 & 1) 77 77 NHCE Count (Under 21 & 1) 56 56

Highly Compensated Employee (HCE)/ Non-highly Compensated Employee (NHCE)

The Current Year Methodology was utilized. The percentages reflected for HCEs and NHCEs are based on actual compensation and contribution data for the current testing period.

Employee Test Results ADP Test ACP Test

Current Year NHCE 7.82% 3.77% Maximum HCE 9.82% 5.77%

Current Year HCE 7.40% 4.28% Test Margin 2.42% 1.49%

Result Pass Pass

4

Nondiscrimination and Compliance Tests – Reference Sheet: Eligibility Determination Plan eligibility was based on the eligibility requirements as defined by the Plan document. The results were based solely on the employee population provided for testing. HCE Determination The Plan elected to apply the top-paid group for purposes of determining Highly Compensated Employees (HCEs). The members of the top-paid group were based on the non-excludable employee population provided by North American Electric Reliability Corporation. A threshold of $157,033.18 was determined based on prior year compensation for this population. Any eligible employee with prior plan year compensation of $157,033.18 or higher is considered an HCE for this testing period. In addition, any 5% owners in the current and/or prior plan year are considered HCEs. IRC §414(s) Compensation Ratio Testing For both the Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) and Non-highly Compensated Employee (NHCE) groups, the Plan definition of Compensation is compared to an IRC safe-harbor definition of Compensation using the Individual Percentage Method. Under the Individual Percentage Method, each individual is given a ratio and an average of ratios is taken for both the HCE and NHCE groups. The Compensation Ratio Test is satisfied if the HCE Compensation Ratio does not exceed the NHCE Compensation Ratio by more than a de minimis amount. (Treasury Regulation §1.414(s)-1(d)(3)). Early Participation Rule – Treasury Regulation §1.401(k)-2(a)(iii) and §1.401(m)-2(a)(iii)– “Otherwise Excludable” NHCEs Plans with initial eligibility requirements which are more liberal than the IRS statutory requirements of semi-annual entry into the Plan (the first day of the next plan year or the first day of the seventh month of the plan year after reaching age 21 and completion of one year of service) may exclude any Non-highly Compensated Employee (NHCEs) who do not meet these statutory age and service requirements from ADP and ACP testing for the plan year being tested. This “early participation” rule does not apply to Highly Compensated Employee (HCEs), regardless of age or service. Please note that the NHCEs who are not subject to ADP or ACP testing are still taken into consideration for all other non-discrimination and compliance testing purposes. The ADP/ACP testing results may be reflective of this methodology. ADP/ACP Testing Methodology In order for a plan to satisfy the requirements of ADP and/or ACP testing, the ADP and/or ACP of the Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) group cannot exceed the greater of 1.25 times the Non-highly Compensated Employee (NHCE) group or the alternative 2% test of the lesser of two (2) plus or two (2) times the NHCE group. The ADP test(s) may include pretax, Roth, or qualified non-elective contributions. The ACP test(s) may include employer match, employee after-tax, or qualified matching contributions. If necessary, Excess Contribution (ADP) and/or Excess Aggregate Contribution (ACP) refund amounts were calculated in order to satisfy the ADP and/or ACP test. If applicable, Excess Contributions were recharacterized as catch-up prior to the calculation of refunds. IRC 410(b) Minimum Coverage Testing The Coverage Test will be satisfied if the Plan benefits a sufficient number of Non-highly Compensated Employees (NHCEs) in proportion to the Highly Compensated Employees (HCEs). Specifically, the ratio of NHCEs that benefit under the Plan over the total number of non-excludable NHCEs of the organization must be at least 70% of the same ratio of HCEs. The results of the coverage testing may be incomplete if the entire population of the employer’s controlled group was not made available to Vanguard. For purposes of the 401(k) Minimum Coverage Test, any employee who was eligible to make

employee pretax and/or Roth contributions was deemed to be “benefiting” for the plan year. For purposes of the 401(m) Minimum Coverage Test, any employee who was eligible to receive a

matching contribution or make employee after-tax contributions was deemed to be “benefiting” for the plan year.

For purposes of the 401(a) Employer Contribution Minimum Coverage Test, any employee who received an employer contribution was deemed to be “benefiting” for the plan year.

5

§415(c) Annual Additions Percentage Limit 100% 100%

Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) Threshold $110,000 $110,000

Limits 2010 2011

§402(g) Deferral Limit $16,500 $16,500

Catch-up Contributions $5,500 $5,500

§415(c) Annual Additions Dollar Limit $49,000 $49,000

§401(a)(17) Annual Limitation on Compensation $245,000 $245,000

2012

$17,000

$5,500

$50,000

100%

$115,000

$250,000

For purposes of the ESOP Contribution Minimum Coverage Test, ESOP and Non-ESOP Contributions are tested separately under Section 401(k), 401(m) and 401(a) for the plan year.

Pursuant to Treasury Regulation §1.410(b)-6(f), separate testing of employees who are considered to be “otherwise excludable” (eligible employees who have not reached age 21 or have not completed a year of service) may have been applied to these portions of the Plan where permitted. The minimum coverage testing results may be reflective of this methodology. Catch-Up Contributions If elected in your plan document, pretax and/or Roth contributions for participants age 50 or older that exceeded the regulatory and/or pretax plan limits have been excluded from the test prior to calculating year-end results. If applicable, the Plan limit imposed administratively for HCEs was applied for purposes of calculating Catch-Up Contributions. Qualified Regulatory Limits Plan Limit Tests The provisions of the Plan define the limits on pretax, Roth and after-tax contributions that participants may make, if any. Additionally, all the Plan contribution formulas are subject to the §401(a)(17) compensation limit which in turn limits the dollar amounts that can be contributed under the respective plan provisions. The tests were performed based on the available information from the most recent plan document made available to us, the regulations in effect for the year, and the data provided. These amounts are shown for informational purposes only and are subject to further review by the plan sponsor/administrator. Additional information on nondiscrimination and compliance testing can be found in the Compliance Center within the Plan Sponsor Bridge®.

North American Electric Reliability Corporation Savings and Investment Plan Presentation to the Corporate Governance and Human Resource Committee July 31, 2012

July 31, 2012 Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee North American Electric Reliability Corporation Savings and Investment Plan 3353 Peachtree Road, NE Suite 600, North Tower Atlanta, GA 30326 Dear Committee Members: We have performed an audit of the financial statements of North American Electric Reliability Corporation Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011. We have prepared the accompanying audit summary highlighting certain required auditor communications which were discussed with Michael Walker and Susan Turpen during our conference call on July 22, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Plan experienced net depreciation in the fair value of investments of approximately $670,000. For 2010, there was net appreciation in the fair value of investments of approximately $1,674,000. The performance of the Plan appears to be in line with most of the 2011 plans that we are in the process of auditing for other clients. The volatility of the stock market accounts for this. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. We shall be pleased to discuss any question or other matters with you. Sincerely,

James M. Sausmer, CPA Partner

AUDIT SUMMARY

Background In 1974, the Department of Labor issued rules and regulations for reporting and disclosure of retirement plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The purpose of these rules and regulations was to protect the participants of retirement plans. ERISA contains a requirement for annual audits of plan financial statements by an independent qualified public accountant. Generally, plans with 100 or more participants as of the beginning of the Plan year, are subject to the audit requirement. NERC files Form 5500, Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan, to report certain information annually to the Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service. The audit report accompanies Form 5500. Audit Status We have completed our audit of the financial statements of North American Electric Reliability Corporation Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 and have issued our report to you. Our professional standards require that we communicate with you concerning certain matters that may be of interest to you in fulfilling your obligation to oversee the financial reporting and disclosure process for which the management of the Plan is responsible. We have prepared the following comments to assist you in fulfilling your obligation. Our Responsibility under Generally Accepted Auditing Standards Our audit was conducted in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards except that, as permitted by Regulation 2520.103-8 of the DOL’s Rules and Regulations for Reporting and Disclosure under ERISA and as instructed by you, we did not perform any auditing procedures with respect to information prepared and certified to by Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, the trustee, in accordance with DOL Regulation 2520.103-5, other than comparing the information with the related information included in the financial statements and supplemental schedule. Because of the significance of the information that we did not audit, we did not express an opinion on the financial statements and schedule taken as a whole. The form and content of the information included in the financial statements and schedule, other than that derived from the information certified to by the trustee, was audited by us in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards, and was subjected to tests of your accounting records and other procedures we considered necessary to enable us to express an opinion that they are presented in compliance with the DOL’s Rules and Regulations for Reporting and Disclosure under ERISA. The audit of the financial statements does not relieve management or those charged with governance of their responsibilities.

AUDIT SUMMARY

We are responsible for performing the audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United State of America. The audit is designed to obtain reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Those standards require, among other things, that we obtain an understanding of the Plan and its environment, including internal control, as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Plan’s internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is limited to the period covered by our audit and does not extend to any later periods for which we are not engaged as auditors. As auditors we must necessarily rely upon the integrity and cooperation of management and assistance of your accounting staff. As a condition of our engagement, we will receive management’s signed written representation letter attesting to the completeness and truthfulness of representations and disclosures made to us during the course of our audit. Overview of Scope of Audit Our procedures included tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; therefore, our audit involved judgment about the number of transactions examined and the areas tested, except that assets and related transactions certified to by the trustee were tested. The areas tested included, but are not limited to, participant eligibility, participant accounts, participant loans, distributions to participants, employer contributions, participant contributions, and timeliness of remittance of employer contributions, and compliance with ERISA and IRS rules and regulations and the provisions of the Plan document. The audit was also planned and performed to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether from errors, fraudulent financial reporting, misappropriation of assets, or violations of laws or governmental regulations prohibited transactions with parties in interest or other violations of ERISA rules and regulations, that are attributable to the Plan or to acts by management or employees acting on behalf of the Plan. Significant Accounting Policies The Plan’s significant accounting policies are set forth in Note 2 to the plan’s 2011 financial statements. During the year ended December 31, 2011, there were no significant changes in previously adopted accounting policies or their application. Management Judgments and Accounting Estimates Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management’s current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience about past and current events and on assumptions about future events. Significant Audit Adjustments As previously mentioned, the form and content of the information included in the 2011 financial statements and supplemental schedule, other than that derived from the information certified by the custodian, have been audited by us in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and, in our opinion, are presented in compliance with the Department of Labor’s Rules and Regulations for Reporting and Disclosure under ERISA. Our audit was designed to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements, whether caused by error or fraud. In addition, we are obligated by auditing standards generally accepted

AUDIT SUMMARY

in the United States of America to inform you of any uncorrected misstatements aggregated by us for the most recent period that were determined by management to be immaterial and therefore not adjusted. All adjustments we identified during the audit have been recorded. Disagreements with Management We have not had any disagreements with management related to matters that are material to the financial statements. Consultation with other Accountants We are not aware of any consultations with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters affecting the 2011 financial statements. Major Issues Discussed with Management Throughout the audit, routine discussions regarding the application of accounting principles or auditing standards were held with management in connection with the transactions that have occurred, transactions that are contemplated or reassessment of current circumstances. Such discussions have been helpful in the conduct of the audit. There were no major issues that required discussions with management. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no difficulties in dealing with management related to the performance of our audit. We received the full cooperation of the Plan’s accounting personnel during the audit. Independence There are no relationships between WeiserMazars LLP and the Plan that, in the professional judgment of WeiserMazars LLP, may reasonably be thought to bear on independence and that WeiserMazars LLP is independent of the Company in all respects.

Agenda Item 6b CGHRC Meeting October 29, 2012

NERC Retirement Plan Administrator Request for Proposal

Action Authorize the Plan Committee to proceed with the issuance of Plan Request for Proposal (RFP). Summary NERC 401(k) plan has been with Vanguard for more than 20 years. During this time, the assets under management have grown to over $24,000,000. As plan fiduciaries, it is important to evidence due diligence by periodically requesting and evaluating proposals from qualified administrative service providers to ensure the plan administrative service provider’s fees are reasonable. Therefore, the Plan Committee is recommending that it be authorized to initiate an in-depth search for the administrative services providers. Since NERC also has a 457(b) Plan (implemented in January, 2011), which is not administered by Vanguard, the search will focus on service providers that are capable, and willing, to administer both plans, as well as the 401K Plan on a standalone basis should a decision be made to switch from Vanguard as the administrator of the 401(k) Plan and stay with the current administrator of the company’s 457B Plan, Employee Fiduciary Corporation. Three documents have been prepared by Rob Swails, our independent advisor, that will be used throughout the RFP process:

• A Vendor Service Questionnaire – This will be used for the 401(k) and the 457(b) Plans. It will be sent to each prospective service provider for completion and remittance to Rob Swails.

• A Sample RFP Summary Report – Rob Swails will consolidate the information contained in the completed/returned questionnaire’s, proposed fund lists, and fee schedules into a report similar in format to this report.

• An RFP Finalist Scorecard – After reviewing and consolidating the various service provider responses, working with Rob Swails, the Plan Committee will narrow the search to two (2) to three (3) finalists and invite each finalist to present their proposal to the committee in person. The Plan Committee will then make a recommendation to the Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee regarding whether to initiate steps to replace Vanguard and if so the recommended replacement service provider.

Copies of these three documents can be made available to the members of the Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee upon request. Rob Swails has placed retirement plan administration with the following service providers and is recommending the companies marked with an asterisk (*) be contacted for a proposal. PNC provides banking services to NERC and requested they be provided an opportunity to respond to the RFP.

• American Funds

• Great West

• Fidelity *

• John Hancock *

• One America

• Principal *

• Prudential *

• PNC Bank * (included at the request of NERC)

• Putnam *

• Scudder (DWS)

• The Standard

• TIAA-CREF

• Transamerica *

• T. Rowe Price

• Vanguard * The Plan committee anticipates that it will take approximately 60 days to complete the RFP process and prepare a recommendation to the Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee. Assuming authorization to proceed with the RFP is granted, the Plan Committee anticipates the need to schedule a meeting with the Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee in January to review and take action based upon the Plan Committee’s recommendation.

Agenda Item 6c CGHRC Meeting

October 29, 2012

Savings and Investment and 457(b) Plan Committee Appointment of Additional Committee Member

Action Approve Summary As the committee is aware, NERC’s Savings and Investment Plan and 457(b) Plan Committees (Plan Committees) are comprised of the chief financial and administrative officer, controller, and director of human resources. In connection with the performance of its responsibilities under the NERC Savings and Investment Plan 401(k) and 457(b) Policy Statements and given the amount of assets currently invested in the company’s retirement plans, management believes the appointment of an additional senior staff member to the Plan Committees would be beneficial in providing an additional perspective to the Plan Committees’ oversight of the company’s retirement plans and otherwise furthering the purpose and intent of the plan policy statements and objectives. Each Policy Statement permits the appointment of additional members to the Plan Committees subject to approval of the Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee. Based on his background, experience and attention to detail, the Plan Committees’ recommend that Jerry Hedrick be appointed as an additional member of the Plan Committees. Jerry joined NERC in June 2012 as the Associate Director of Compliance Operations with responsibility for refining the Regional Entity Audit Oversight Program and supporting the development of internal controls development in support of risk-based compliance monitoring efforts and the Compliance Enforcement and Monitoring Program. Prior, Jerry was with Vectren Corporation in Evansville, Indiana as a Director-Corporate Audit with responsibilities for the strategic and tactical direction and operations of the audit department as well as Dell, Inc. as an Audit Manager-Fraud Deterrence and Examination, Senior Materials Manager, Program Manager, and Senior Financial Analyst. Jerry previously worked for Union Pacific Railroad. Jerry has a Bachelors of Business Administration in Accounting and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Oklahoma.

Employee Climate Survey

Damon Epperson, Director of Human Resources Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee Meeting October 29, 2012


2 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY

Survey Goals

• To quantitatively measure current organization climate

• Provide staff a vehicle to provide feedback about their work experiences

• Identify areas for organizational/operational improvement

• Enhance employee engagement and improve retention

• Establish a baseline against which year-over-year improvements can be made


Topic Areas

• Job satisfaction

• Pay, benefits and recognition

• Work-life balance

• Education and training

• Department and organizational effectiveness

• Performance management

• Management and leadership

• Stakeholder engagement

• Commitment to diversity and positive work environment

• Strategy, mission, values, and ethics

• Company overall


Survey Features

• Participation is anonymous and guaranteed confidential

• Survey is completed on the TalentQuest electronic platform

• Items are rated on a 5-point rating scale to allow for fine distinctions amongst topic items

• Survey includes qualitative, open-ended questions

• Survey would segment respondents by department and manager/individual contributor


Timeline

• Final survey questions provided as an update at February 2013 CGHRC meeting

• Survey launched in March 2013

• Responses due by April 2013

• Findings report presented at May 2013 CGHRC meeting

• Responsive-to-feedback action plans launched in Q3 2013 and reported on as appropriate periodically

2012 NERC Performance Report through September 30, 2012 Gerry Cauley, President and CEO October , 2012



Background

• 2012 corporate performance measures based on: 2012-2015 ERO Enterprise Strategic Plan (goals,

objectives, and pre-established metrics)

2012 corporate business plan and budget

Three-year ERO Performance Assessment

• Progress is reviewed quarterly with management team

• Results are used in determining performance compensation at corporate and department levels


Three Major Goal Areas

• Corporate performance measures are structured around the framework provided by the ERO Enterprise Strategic Plan, spanning goals in three areas: Standards and compliance

Risks to reliability

Coordination and collaboration


Department Performance – Q3

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

64.23% 67.45%

75.78% 71.45%

61.97% 62.64% 60.91%

84.66% 83.62%

69.20%

Percent Progress

Q3 Target

Q3 Threshold


Department Contributions

* Executive and Corporate Support includes: IT, Government Relations, Finance, and other corporate support functions and measures.

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

9.60% 9.58% 9.93% 10.15% 8.89% 5.79%

4.14%

9.99%

1.13%

Incomplete

Complete

Total company progress for Q3: 69% of target


Leading Results at Q3

• Develop technical references/guides for reliability standards

• Identify nature of violations associated with most significant events

• Trend reliability issues and share results

• Provide event analysis (cataloging, prioritizing and assessing)

• Develop and maintain situational awareness (SAFNR)

• Deliver reliability assessments and emerging issues

• Assist industry in improving reliability data modeling

• Qualify and train staffs (NERC and REs): develop certification criteria

• Deliver initial modules of a secure information management system

• Develop an ERO-wide risk management program with effective internal controls

• Implement recommendations from three year ERO assessment


• Reduce standards-related directives remaining - NERC is developing a plan for an omnibus project to review and address a large number of directives in a single project – anticipated 2013 filing.

• Process time objectives for FFTs – Improvements are needed in the timeliness of data collection from the Regions required to make FFT determinations and the time it takes to classify possible violations as FFT. NERC continues to work with the Regions and registered entities to improve this metric.

• Develop risk-based compliance monitoring approaches to maximize reliability benefits – Pilots are expected in 2013 following the outcomes of the CEI initiatives.

• Implement risk management plan and project initiation – RISC is reviewing the Cold Weather recommendation. NERC staff is working on supporting data analyses to initiate other projects.

Lagging Results at Q3

Agenda Item 9 CGHRC Meeting

October 29, 2012

Human Resources and Staffing/Recruiting Update Action None Summary Benefits and Total Rewards Pay Practices Optimization Human Resources (HR) is utilizing the total remuneration policy adopted by the Committee in connection with employee recruiting, engagement, and retention activities. Consistent with the FERC audit recommendations, HR is also engaged in a comprehensive review of job descriptions and grading is underway to ensure that they capture the particular skills and competencies required to perform necessary tasks of each organizational position. This work is expected to be completed in concert with the annual performance management cycle. To improve the ratio of employees electing HSA to PPO and create momentum to phase out the PPO offering no later than 2014, HR will continue to provide staff education about plan features. A lunch and learn on features and benefits of the HSA was conducted in Q3 and further education is planned in Q4. Development of a Learning Culture As the committee is aware, all staff have been assigned a minimum mandatory 20-hour training expectation linked to 2012 performance goals. Since January 1, 2012, NERC staff have completed over 2,500 hours on the SkillSoft e-learning platform, including substantial participation rates in business effectiveness modules such as management of quality, critical thinking, business writing/grammar/punctuation, project management and a variety of Office Suite productivity courses. In addition to online training, staff have had access to several skills development opportunities in 2012 including presentation skills classroom training, a lunch and learn series covering NERC programs, cause analysis, compliance investigation processes, electric power system basics training, human performance on the grid, effective communications, and offsite tours of control centers and electric sub stations. In Q4 and in 2013, staff will have broader access to outside tours and power system fundamentals training. HR Products and Services Automation and Enhancement Over the last year, HR has made significant advances in the automation and use of electronic systems including installation and optimization of an e-learning portal, online performance management system, effectiveness surveys, tied-to-payroll time and attendance, and employee self services – all geared towards increasing convenience to the employee and encouraging more consumption.

Since the last update HR has:

• Indentified and is in-process of launching a benefits enrollment system (which eliminates new-hire paperwork, makes open enrollment paperless, and automates several currently manual processes).

• Designed and is in-process of implementing the next phase of NERC’s workforce (time keeping) management system, consistent with the approach outlined by NERC in the audit proceeding. A suite of more detailed activity codes and associated employee training will be launched in early November. Each month, standard reports showing employee time by activity and department will be provided to management personnel to support resource management and planning.

• Launched a single sign on project that enables secure, seamless entry to all HR products (i.e., e-learning portal, performance management tool, etc.) without entering additional log-in credentials as well as significantly reduces duplicative and manual data entry that will reduce the need for the existing part-time HR specialist role beginning in 2013.

Social Responsibility and Team Building Management believes that NERC has an opportunity to strengthen culture and build employee morale by promotion of employee engagement and team-building through community based charitable activities. To help capitalize on this opportunity, management has created the Community Responsibility and Employee Engagement Committee (CREEC). CREEC has launched an employee-sponsored donation drive to support four Atlanta and D.C. charitable organizations. Additional volunteer and charitable event activities are planned for later in the year. Succession Planning and Career Mobility As the committee is aware, management developed succession planning tools in 2012 to minimize disruption from loss of critical knowledge, skills, and abilities. As a key component of this planning, management periodically reviewed in 2012 the alignment of staff skills to roles and readiness to acquire new responsibilities and has completed 26 promotions year to date. Potential for staff promotion will be considered during year-end performance management cycle and periodically ongoing. Staffing and Recruiting Talent acquisition remains a top priority and HR continues to support management initiatives tosignificantly enhance the quality and fit of talent. The period of July through September 2012 saw the exit of 14 and hiring of 16 employees. HR anticipates filling the remaining open, approved headcount in the 2012 Business Plan and Budget by year-end, as well as continues to work to backfill attrition with top talent at or under budget.

agenda corporate governance and human resources committee - nerc.com of trustees governance...

Documents