affidavit response to brian d. jones february 10th 2012

7/31/2019 Affidavit Response to Brian D. Jones February 10th 2012

1/4

1

PATRIK BERNARD KAPUSCINSKY February 15th 2012Office of the Director,Dually Appointed Administrator Court File Number: 35900-115-791 Braidwood Road, Court Location: Courtenay, British Columbia, Canada.Courtenay BC, Canada

V9N 3S1

This Notice is a matter of Public Record

Brian D. JONES and co-workers, CROWN ATTORNEYJONES & CO.Barrister & SolicitorsSuite 402-17 Church St Nanaimo, BC Canada, V9R 5H5

Hugh STANSFIELD, (The Honorable) CHIEF JUDGEThe Judicial Council of British Columbia,Office of the Chief Judge Suite 602 700 West Georgia StreetPO Box 10287 Pacific Centre Vancouver BC V7Y 1E8

Robert NICHOLSON,P.C., M.P. MINISTER OF JUSTICE ANDMinister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADAHouse of Commons Ottawa ON K1A 0A6 and284 Wellington St. Ottawa, ON K1A 0H8

Shirley BOND, PO Box 9053 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA B.C., V8W 9E2, MINISTER OF PUBLIC128 Parliament Buildings Victoria B.C., CanadaV8V 1X4, SAFETY AND SOLICITORC/o Legal Services Branch, Ministry of Attorney General, GENERAL OF BC1001 Douglas Street, Victoria, B.C., Canada

PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICES OF CANADA, PROSECUTORRobert Prior, Chief Federal Prosecutor, Regional Offices, British ColumbiaPublic Prosecution Service of Canada, British Columbia Regional Office (Vancouver),Robson Court, 900840 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2S9 604-666-5250

Brian SAUNDERS, Headquarters, Director of Public Prosecutions, PROSECUTOR P P S CPublic Prosecution Service of Canada, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions284 Wellington Street, Room 2359, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8

Andre A. MORIN A/Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions PROSECUTOR P P S CPublic Prosecution Service of Canada284 Wellington Street, Room 2329, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8

George DOLHAI A/Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions PROSECUTOR P P S CPublic Prosecution Service of Canada222 Queen Street, Room 1128, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8


2/4

2

Breach of Trust: Harassment Trespassing Abduction &93 hours unlawful Confinement

Affidavit: Court File Number: 35900-1, location: Courtenay BC Canada February 15th 2012

I, _____________________________________do swear and know these facts to be true and

accurate.

To the attention of Brian D. JONES, Marsha DOWN, Timothy MORGAN, Jill VIVIAN,A. MACDONALD, and Robert L. GIBSON and all other Public Servants involved,

We are in a common law jurisdiction. I am operating under common law since May 2010.

The law of Canada is that we in Canada are in a common law jurisdiction and the contract makes the law.

For statute law to become valid there must be agreement from both parties that this particular law is infact law. Without this agreement or consentthere is no law in effect. Acts of Statute Law are given theforce of law only through VALID consent. Acts that intentionally cause harm and are being forced by

any aspect of the less than perfect system in place with clear lack of valid consent is in fact criminalnegligence and now goes under contract law. I have not yet seen the contract that you require to dobusiness with me. I have asked numerous times for you to provide this contract; you have failed toproduce this necessary proof of a valid consensual contract.

You have already agreed to the fact that Acts do not apply to a private individual back in September of2011. There is no need for more of the tax payers money to pay for unnecessary court time when this hadbeen resolved through non-contested and non-disputed or non-rebutted sworn affidavits inserted intocourt file # 35900-1 on the 21rst of September of 2011. Also inserted into the Court file on the same date,is a Motion to Strike the Matter from the RecordNotice of Default Judgment and Notice of Duties andIntent, had been added to the court file on October 27th2011 According to actual Law you haveagreed with my claims by failing to rebut my affidavit within the 10 days specified in each affidavit.

Your ignorance of law or that of others is NO excuse. It is a maxim of law that an un-rebutted affidavitstands as truth, and which is recognized by our court systemtherefore there is no need for court sincethere is no controversy aside from bringing you to the front of the Queens Bench for unnecessarydamages done.

Your ongoing lack of response to my request to see a valid contract between our parties is veryirresponsible and juvenile behavior on your part. One member of your legal team, Robert L. GIBSON hasfinally responded by letter on the 8th day of February, 2012, stating his and apparently your ignorance oflaw. This printed and signed ignorance of law is truly remarkable.

Inform me, in writing Brian D. JONES, exactly whom do you represent in your claim of me owing you orthe corporation that you represent a hundred and fifty dollars for apparent damages done of breaking rulesthat only apply to Government Agents such as Public ServantsDo you claim to represent Queen Elizabeth from the House of Windsor..? or do you represent theprivately owned Crown Corporation operating out of Inner City London..?

Whom exactly do you represent and work for?

I do not abide by any acts of Statute Law due to the misuse and abuse of law being perpetrated by mal-intentioned men through abuse of Statute law in the form of harmful Acts created by Corporations.


3/4

3

As a private individual, I require a contract from you to prove our agreement of contract within thiscommon law jurisdiction. I did not choose to engage into contract with you, you chose to continue toengage into conflict with me, despite my Notice of clarification along with a Notice to stand down.

You presently have an outstanding balance of Fee Schedule activation of $ 634 556.00 due to your choiceof conflict, despite my clear and honest actions taken to clarify proper status claim with you, non-disputed

or non-contested by you and others, having made these claims facts, and that you are in agreement tothese facts by September 21rst 2011. Your lack of rebut IS your agreement to the claim, making theclaims, Facts due to lack of contest.

Should another illegal and unlawful warrant be issued over this nonsense, you will be billed an additional$ 6 936 936.00 over and above your original bill and your corporate boss will be billed much more thanthe present outstanding bill due to your insistence on attempting to continue to perpetrate fraud upon aprivate individual.

An additional $ 500 000.00 per day of detainment will be billed to you, the Province and any other PublicServant involved in the event of further illegal and unlawful unwanted services of abduction or unwantedservice of detainment or the unwanted service of unlawful confinement in the event of any further law

breaking choices made by Servants of the Public.

In order for law to be broken, there must be an injured party.

Are you claiming that I have injured you or anyone else in this process of criminal Public Servantbehavior?

Are you claiming that I have perhaps injured Queen Elizabeth from the House of Windsor?

Are you claiming that I have injured any of the men who own and operate the privately owned CrownCorporation out of Inner City London?

Are you claiming that I have injured the unlawful Constables who blatantly stole life & health promotingand pain management medication from me? (For your own information, concerning facts of actuallawStealing is truly criminal behavior in this Common Law Jurisdiction.)

Are you claiming that the Officers who abducted me over a previously addressed and resolved warrantand proceeded to lock me in a jail cell for nearly 94 hours total have been injured by me?Abduction of another human being is very criminal behavior. Illegally detaining someone for any lengthof time is severely criminal behavior especially coming from people who claim to be Peace Officers andPublic Servants working the legal system, known as members of the Law Courts or Court ServicesClear lack of consent makes this behavior of Servants very illegal as well as unlawful.

So far the collective Servants involved in this ongoing nonsense are guilty of all three legitimate ways to

actuallybreak the law and that is,

#1, to hurt or harm another#2, to steal or damage anothers property and#3, to knowingly participate in fraud

There have been 12 dates set for this nonsense in court of which I had attended 7 to clarify and spell itout for a host of law breaking Servants operating in Breach.


4/4

4

Failure to produce a valid contract between our two parties is reason and grounds for me to order you tocease and desist from attempting to continue to perpetrate fraud upon me, as I have by way of Notice.

Failure to stand under this fair warning will cause your bill to grow remarkably. Your Bill and that ofothers that you have dragged into this lawsuit will grow substantially due to your choice of engagementinto conflict, after failing to produce a valid contract upon my reasonable and valid request.

Whether you are simply unable to grasp the facts through taking the time required to read my Noticesor are simply in denial of facts of law I have shared and served plenty of factual claims with you in theform of documents concerning accurate law Your claimed ignorance does not change the law or howlaw comes about. Ignorance of law is of no excuse.

You are the creator of an outstanding balance for your insistence on damages done to me despite mymultiple communications of relevant facts with you and others, and despite my demand that you standdown, through registered mail and Process Server. It is up to you if your outstanding bill and that ofothers increases drastically from this date forward.

Despite the fact that I have showed you my contract, you continued to attempt to process me as property

of the Crown, with which I have seen no subsiding contract as per my valid request.I am a private individual presently operating under the common law, since May of 2010. I have officiallyrevoked consent to be governed due to horrific damages done to me by words of deception in the form ofacts which led to the study of human rights and in turn, the intense study and application of law for the

purpose of gaining remedy through law within this common law jurisdiction.

I am bound by contract to not participate in fraud therefore I will not be participating in tax fraud of yetanother non-consensual court appearance on the 23rd of February or the 3rd day of April, 2012 over thisabusive process for any reason or anyone unless you produce a valid contract to verify the legitimacyof your claim to do business with me against my will, under your terms and conditions without myconsent. Show me the contract that you claim to have the right to exercise and abuse force upon mewithin this common law jurisdiction.

Your lack of contest or rebut to this affidavit is your agreement to all details contained within.

Witnesses: Sincerely, Patrik-Bernard:Kapuscinsky

Dually Appointed Administrator

affidavit response to brian d. jones february 10th 2012

Documents