aep c3 rubric - student version

8/17/2019 AEP C3 Rubric - Student Version

1/3

Course 3, Energy Change Leadership and Performance Assurance: Scoring Rubric for In-Class Exercises (ICE)

General Scoring Criteria

Criteria Unsatisfactory = 0 Points Limited = 1 Points Proficient = 3 Points Exemplary = 5 Points

Critical Analysis and

Synthesis of Course

Materials

Credited elements are notaddressed. ICE submissions show

little or no evidence that readings

or activities were completed or

understood. Submissions, if

made, are comprised of personal

opinions without support from

the materials, activities, outside

resources, relevant research, or

applicable experience.

Credited elements are minimallyaddressed. ICE submissions

repeat and/or summarize basic,

correct information, but do not

provide support from the

materials, activities, outside

resources, relevant research, or

applicable experience, or

consider alternative perspectives

or connections between ideas.

Credited elements are partially

addressed. ICE submissionsdemonstrate a thorough

understanding of the required

materials and their underlying

concepts, including correct use

of terminology. Thoughtful links

are made between concepts,

and to outside references,

relevant research, or alternative

perspectives. Some synthesis of

class concepts can be found.

Credited elements are thoroughlyaddressed. ICE submissions display

an excellent understanding of the

required readings and underlying

concepts, including correct use of

terminology. Class concepts are

intelligently synthesized, and

responses integrate an outside

resources to support important

points.

Participation and

Professionalism

ICE responses are not completed

at all, and/or postings to the

discussion board do notcontribute to the ongoing

conversation on the discussion

board. There is no evidence of

engagement with other students.

Postings on the ICE discussion

board show blatant disrespect

for the viewpoints of others,

and/or are submitted with

numerous grammatical, spelling

or punctuation errors.

ICE responses are completed late

(without valid reason), and/or

postings to the discussion board

contribute only minimally to theongoing discussion by affirming

prior statements, asking basic

questions, or making

oppositional statements.


board show moderate disrespect

for the viewpoints of others,

and/or include enough

grammatical, spelling or

punctuation errors to detract

from their clarity.

ICE responses are completed on

time, and/or postings to the

discussion board contribute

somewhat to the ongoing

discussion by asking relevantquestions or sharing meaningful

ideas. Assertions are supported

by proper references to course

materials or other appropriate

sources.


board show respect for the

viewpoints of others, and are

largely free from grammatical,

spelling or punctuation errors.

The style of writing is sufficient

to communicate.

ICE responses are completed on

time, and/or postings to the

discussion board actively stimulate

and sustain further discussion by

introducing new ideas and/or

building on peers' responses.

Evidence may include asking

creative questions and sharing

original ideas. Assertions are

supported by proper references to

course materials or other

appropriate sources.

Written interactions on the

discussion board show respect and

sensitivity to others, and are free of


punctuation errors. The style of

writing facilitates communication.


2/3

Course 3, Energy Change Leadership and Performance Assurance: Scoring Rubric for Homework Assignments


Criteria Unsatisfactory = 0 Points Limited = 1 Points Proficient = 3 Points Exemplary = 5 Points

Critical Analysis and

Synthesis of Course

Materials

Credited elements are not

addressed. Homeworksubmissions show little or no

evidence that readings or

activities were completed or

understood. Submissions, if

made, are comprised of

personal opinions without

support from the materials,

activities, outside resources,

relevant research, or applicable

experience.

Credited elements are minimallyaddressed. Homework

submissions repeat and/or

summarize basic, correct

information, but do not provide

support from the materials,

activities, outside resources,

relevant research, or applicable

experience, or consider

alternative perspectives or

connections between ideas.


addressed. Homeworksubmissions demonstrate a

thorough understanding of the

required materials and their

underlying concepts, including

correct use of terminology.

Thoughtful links are made

between concepts, and to outside

references, relevant research, or

alternative perspectives. Some

synthesis of class concepts can be

found.

Credited elements are thoroughlyaddressed. Homework

submissions display an excellent

understanding of the required

readings and underlying concepts,

including correct use of

terminology. Class concepts are

intelligently synthesized, and

responses integrate an outside

resources to support important

points.

Participation and

Professionalism

Homework submissions are not

completed at all, or are

submitted with numerous


punctuation errors.

Homework submissions are

completed late (without valid

reason), or include enough


punctuation errors to detract

from their clarity.


completed on time, and are

largely free from grammatical,

spelling or punctuation errors.

The style of writing is sufficient to

communicate.


completed on time, and are free

from grammatical, spelling or

punctuation errors. The style of

writing is strong, and fosters clear

communication.


3/3

Course 3, Energy Change Leadership and Performance Assurance: Scoring Rubric for AEP Final Project


Criteria Unsatisfactory = < 10 points Limited = 10-15 points Proficient = 15-20 points Exemplary = 20-25 points

Presentation Content

(Group)

Credited elements are not

addressed. Presentation slides lack

information needed to understand

the topic; content is confusing or

contains inaccuracies; there is no

clear plan for the organization of

information.

Credited elements are minimally

addressed. Presentation slides

include general information to give

an understanding of the topic;

content maycontain some

inaccuracies and/or information is

not logically sequenced in places.


addressed. Presentation slides

include adequate information

needed to give an understanding

of the topic; content is mostly

accurate and sequenced in a

logical way for the most part.

Credited elements are thoroughly

addressed. Presentation slidesinclude information needed to give

a thorough understanding of the

topic; content is accurate and

sequenced in a clear, logical way.

Presentation Design

(Group)

Slides generally lack visual appeal

and are text-heavy with little or no

visuals and/or exhibit an overuse

of color or animations. Media,

(e.g., images), if used, are rarely

cited on each slide. No theme is

evident and the presentation

appears disjointed rather than

unified and/or frequent written

errors on the slides.

Slides generally include a mix of

white space, visuals, and/or text

but not consistently and/or some

overuse of color or animations.

Media (e/g., images), if used, may

not be consistently cited to give

proper attribution. Theme (e.g.,

template) is not consistently

evident throughout the

presentation and/or some written


Slides are effectively designed

with visual appeal including white

space, visuals, and minimal text

for the most part. Color and

animations are used

appropriately. Media (e.g.,

images), if used, are generally

cited to give proper attribution.

Theme (e.g., template) is evident

in the presentation for the most

part to produce a cohesive

presentation and/or little written


Slides are visually well designed,

aesthetically pleasing with

appropriate use of white space,

visuals, and minimal text, on each

slide. Color and animations are

used judiciously. Media (e.g.

images), if used, are always cited

on the slide to give proper

attribution. Theme (e.g., template)

is evident throughout to produce a

highly cohesive presentation.

Basically free from written errors

on the slides.

Timeliness and Length

of Presentation

(Group)

Presentation is completed after the

deadline and/or substantially lacks

the required length.

Presentation is completed by the

deadline, but just falls short of the

required length.

Presentation is completed by the

deadline and meets the required

length.

Presentation is completed before

the deadline and meets or exceeds

the required length (5-7 slides).

Contribution to Group

(Individual)

Group member rarely participated

or contributed to the project

towards achieving the project goals

and meeting the deadline; did not

share workload fairly.

Group member participated in the

project but emphasis was in

completing own work; allowed

others to assume leadership

and/or may have not shared

workload fairly towards achieving

the project goals and meeting the

deadline.

Group member participated in the

project and shared the workload;

contributed to the development of

one or more slides; worked

towards achieving the project

goals and meeting the deadline.

Group member participated fully in

the project and shared the

workload fairly; contributed to the

development of one or more slides

and assisted in editing others’

slides to produce a polished

presentation. Demonstrated

leadership to facilitate and achieve

the project goals and meet

deadline.

aep c3 rubric - student version

Documents