aep c2 rubric - student version

8/17/2019 AEP C2 Rubric - Student Version

1/3

Course 2, Energy Project Finance: Scoring Rubric for In-Class Exercises (ICE)

General Scoring Criteria

Criteria Unsatisfactory = 0 Points Limited = 1 Points Proficient = 3 Points Exemplary = 5 Points

Critical Analysis and

Synthesis of Course

Materials

Credited elements are not

addressed. ICE submissions show

little or no evidence that readings

or activities were completed or

understood. Submissions, if

made, are comprised of personal

opinions without support from

the materials, activities, outside

resources, relevant research, or

applicable experience.

Credited elements are minimally

addressed. ICE submissions

repeat and/or summarize basic,

correct information, but do not

provide support from the

materials, activities, outside

resources, relevant research, or

applicable experience, or

consider alternative perspectives

or connections between ideas.

Credited elements are partiallyaddressed. ICE submissions

demonstrate a thorough

understanding of the required

materials and their underlying

concepts, including correct use

of terminology. Thoughtful links

are made between concepts,

and to outside references,

relevant research, or alternative

perspectives. Some synthesis of

class concepts can be found.

Credited elements are

thoroughly addressed. ICE

submissions display an excellent


readings and underlying

concepts, including correct use of

terminology. Class concepts are

intelligently synthesized, and

responses integrate an outside

resources to support important

points.

Participation and

Professionalism

ICE responses are not completed

at all, and/or postings to the

discussion board do not

contribute to the ongoing

conversation on the discussion

board. There is no evidence of

engagement with other students.

Postings on the ICE discussion

board show blatant disrespect for

the viewpoints of others, and/or

are submitted with numerous

grammatical, spelling or

punctuation errors.

ICE responses are completed late

(without valid reason), and/or

postings to the discussion board

contribute only minimally to the

ongoing discussion by affirming

prior statements, asking basic

questions, or making

oppositional statements.


board show moderate disrespect

for the viewpoints of others,

and/or include enough


punctuation errors to detractfrom their clarity.

ICE responses are completed on

time, and/or postings to the

discussion board contribute

somewhat to the ongoing

discussion by asking relevant

questions or sharing meaningful

ideas. Assertions are supported

by proper references to course

materials or other appropriate

sources.


board show respect for the

viewpoints of others, and are

largely free from grammatical,

spelling or punctuation errors.The style of writing is sufficient

to communicate.

ICE responses are completed on

time, and/or postings to the

discussion board actively

stimulate and sustain further

discussion by introducing new

ideas and/or building on peers'

responses. Evidence may include

asking creative questions and

sharing original ideas. Assertions

are supported by proper

references to course materials or

other appropriate sources.

Written interactions on the

discussion board show respect

and sensitivity to others, and are

free of grammatical, spelling orpunctuation errors. The style of

writing facilitates

communication.


2/3

Course 2, Energy Project Finance: Scoring Rubric for Homework Assignments


Criteria Unsatisfactory = 0 Points Limited = 1 Points Proficient = 3 Points Exemplary = 5 Points

Critical Analysis and

Synthesis of Course

Materials


addressed. Homework

submissions show little or no

evidence that readings or

activities were completed or

understood. Submissions, if

made, are comprised of

personal opinions without

support from the materials,

activities, outside resources,

relevant research, or applicable

experience.


addressed. Homework

submissions repeat and/or

summarize basic, correct

information, but do not provide

support from the materials,

activities, outside resources,

relevant research, or applicable

experience, or consider

alternative perspectives or

connections between ideas.

Credited elements are partially

addressed. Homework

submissions demonstrate a

thorough understanding of the

required materials and their

underlying concepts, including

correct use of terminology.

Thoughtful links are made

between concepts, and to outside

references, relevant research, or

alternative perspectives. Some

synthesis of class concepts can be

found.

Credited elements are thoroughly

addressed. Homework

submissions display an excellent


readings and underlying concepts,

including correct use of

terminology. Class concepts are

intelligently synthesized, and

responses integrate an outside

resources to support important

points.

Participation and

Professionalism

Homework submissions are not

completed at all, or are

submitted with numerous


punctuation errors.

Homework submissions are

completed late (without valid

reason), or include enough


punctuation errors to detract

from their clarity.


completed on time, and are

largely free from grammatical,

spelling or punctuation errors.

The style of writing is sufficient to

communicate.


completed on time, and are free

from grammatical, spelling or

punctuation errors. The style of

writing is strong, and fosters clear

communication.


3/3

Course 2, Energy Project Finance: Scoring Rubric for Final Project


Criteria Unsatisfactory = < 10 points Limited = 10-15 points Proficient = 15-20 points Exemplary = 20-25 points

Presentation Content

(Group)


addressed. Presentation slides

lack information needed to

understand the topic; content is

confusing or contains

inaccuracies; there is no clear

plan for the organization of

information.



include general information to

give an understanding of the

topic; content maycontain some

inaccuracies and/or information

is not logically sequenced in

places.

Credited elements are partially


include adequate information

needed to give an

understanding of the topic;

content is mostly accurate and

sequenced in a logical way for

the most part.

Credited elements are

thoroughly addressed.

Presentation slides include

information needed to give a

thorough understanding of the

topic; content is accurate and

sequenced in a clear, logical

way.

Presentation Design

(Group)

Slides generally lack visual

appeal and are text-heavy with

little or no visuals and/or exhibit

an overuse of color or

animations. Media, (e.g.,

images), if used, are rarely cited

on each slide. No theme is

evident and the presentation

appears disjointed rather than

unified and/or frequent written

errors on the slides.

Slides generally include a mix of

white space, visuals, and/or text

but not consistently and/or some

overuse of color or animations.

Media (e/g., images), if used, may

not be consistently cited to give

proper attribution. Theme (e.g.,

template) is not consistently

evident throughout the

presentation and/or some

written errors on the slides.

Slides are effectively designed

with visual appeal including

white space, visuals, and

minimal text for the most part.

Color and animations are used

appropriately. Media (e.g.,images), if used, are generally

cited to give proper attribution.

Theme (e.g., template) is

evident in the presentation for

the most part to produce a

cohesive presentation and/or

little written errors on the

slides.

Slides are visually well designed,

aesthetically pleasing with

appropriate use of white space,

visuals, and minimal text, on

each slide. Color and animations

are used judiciously. Media (e.g.

images), if used, are always

cited on the slide to give proper

attribution. Theme (e.g.,

template) is evident throughout

to produce a highly cohesive

presentation. Basically free from

written errors on the slides.

Timeliness and

Length of

Presentation

(Group)

Presentation is completed after

the deadline and/or

substantially lacks the required

length.

Presentation is completed by the

deadline, but just falls short of

the required length.

Presentation is completed by

the deadline and meets the

required length.

Presentation is completed

before the deadline and meets

or exceeds the required length

(5-7 slides).

Contribution to

Group

(Individual)

Group member rarely

participated or contributed to

the project towards achieving

the project goals and meeting

the deadline; did not share

workload fairly.

Group member participated in

the project but emphasis was in

completing own work; allowed

others to assume leadership

and/or may have not shared

workload fairly towards achieving

the project goals and meeting the

deadline.

Group member participated in

the project and shared the

workload; contributed to the

development of one or more

slides; worked towards

achieving the project goals and

meeting the deadline.

Group member participated

fully in the project and shared

the workload fairly; contributed

to the development of one or

more slides and assisted in

editing others’ slides to produce

a polished presentation.

Demonstrated leadership to

facilitate and achieve the

project goals and meet

deadline.

aep c2 rubric - student version

Documents