aep c1 rubric - student version

8/17/2019 AEP C1 Rubric - Student Version

1/3

Course 1, Energy Technologies and Real Estate Strategy: Scoring Rubric for In-Class Exercises (ICE)

General Scoring Criteria

Criteria Unsatisfactory = 0 Points Limited = 1 Points Proficient = 3 Points Exemplary = 5 Points

Critical Analysis

and Synthesis of

Course Materials

Credited elements are not addressed.

ICE submissions show little or no

evidence that readings or activities

were completed or understood.

Submissions, if made, are comprised of

personal opinions without support from

the materials, activities, outside

resources, relevant research, or

applicable experience.

Credited elements are minimally

addressed. ICE submissions repeat

and/or summarize basic, correct

information, but do not provide

support from the materials, activities,

outside resources, relevant research,

or applicable experience, or consider

alternative perspectives or

connections between ideas.

re e e emen s are par a y

addressed. ICE submissions

demonstrate a thorough

understanding of the requiredmaterials and their underlying

concepts, including correct use of

terminology. Thoughtful links are

made between concepts, and to

outside references, relevant research,

or alternative perspectives. Some

synthesis of class concepts can be

Credited elements are thoroughly

addressed. ICE submissions display an

excellent understanding of the required

readings and underlying concepts,

including correct use of terminology.

Class concepts are intelligently

synthesized, and responses integrate an

outside resources to support important

points.

Participation and

Professionalism

ICE responses are not completed at all,

and/or postings to the discussion board

do not contribute to the ongoing

conversation on the discussion board.

There is no evidence of engagement

with other students.

Postings on the ICE discussion board

show blatant disrespect for the

viewpoints of others, and/or are

submitted with numerous grammatical,

spelling or punctuation errors.

ICE responses are completed late

(without valid reason), and/or

postings to the discussion board

contribute only minimally to the

ongoing discussion by affirming prior

statements, asking basic questions, or

making oppositional statements.


show moderate disrespect for the

viewpoints of others, and/or include

enough grammatical, spelling or

punctuation errors to detract from

their clarity.

ICE responses are completed on time,

and/or postings to the discussion

board contribute somewhat to the

ongoing discussion by asking relevant

questions or sharing meaningful

ideas. Assertions are supported by

proper references to course materials

or other appropriate sources.


show respect for the viewpoints of

others, and are largely free from

grammatical, spelling or punctuation

errors. The style of writing is

sufficient to communicate.

ICE responses are completed on time,

and/or postings to the discussion board

actively stimulate and sustain further

discussion by introducing new ideas

and/or building on peers' responses.

Evidence may include asking creative

questions and sharing original ideas.

Assertions are supported by proper

references to course materials or otherappropriate sources.

Written interactions on the discussion

board show respect and sensitivity to

others, and are free of grammatical,

spelling or punctuation errors. The style

of writing facilitates communication.


2/3

General Scoring CriteriaCriteria Unsatisfactory = 0 Points Limited = 1 Points Proficient = 3 Points Exemplary = 5 Points

Critical Analysis

and Synthesis of

Course Materials


Homework submissions show little or

no evidence that readings or activities

were completed or understood.

Submissions, if made, are comprised of

personal opinions without support from

the materials, activities, outside

resources, relevant research, or

applicable experience.

Credited elements are minimallyaddressed. Homework

submissions repeat and/or

summarize basic, correct

information, but do not provide

support from the materials,

activities, outside resources,

relevant research, or applicable

experience, or consider

alternative perspectives or

connections between ideas.

Credited elements are partially

addressed. Homeworksubmissions demonstrate a

thorough understanding of the

required materials and their

underlying concepts, including

correct use of terminology.

Thoughtful links are made

between concepts, and to outside

references, relevant research, or

alternative perspectives. Some

synthesis of class concepts can be

found.

Credited elements are

thoroughly addressed.Homework submissions

display an excellent

understanding of the

required readings and

underlying concepts,

including correct use of

terminology. Class concepts

are intelligently synthesized,

and responses integrate an

outside resources to support

important points.

Participation and

Professionalism

Homework submissions are not

completed at all, or are submitted with

numerous grammatical, spelling or

punctuation errors.

Homework submissions are

completed late (without valid

reason), or include enough

grammatical, spelling or

punctuation errors to detract

from their clarity.


completed on time, and are

largely free from grammatical,

spelling or punctuation errors.

The style of writing is sufficient to

communicate.


completed on time, and are

free from grammatical,

spelling or punctuationerrors. The style of writing is

strong, and fosters clear

communication.

Course 1, Energy Technologies and Real Estate Strategy: Scoring Rubric for

Homework Assignments


3/3

Course 1, Energy Technologies and Real Estate Strategy: Scoring Rubric for Final Project

General Scoring Criteria

Criteria Unsatisfactory = < 10 points Limited = 10-15 points Proficient = 15-20 points Exemplary = 20-25 points

Presentation

Content (Group)


Presentation slides lack information

needed to understand the topic;

content is confusing or contains

inaccuracies; there is no clear plan for

the organization of information.

Credited elements are minimally

addressed. Presentation slides

include general information to give

an understanding of the topic;

content maycontain some

inaccuracies and/or information is

not logically sequenced in places.

Credited elements are partially

addressed. Presentation slides include

adequate information needed to give

an understanding of the topic; content

is mostly accurate and sequenced in a

logical way for the most part.

Credited elements are thoroughly

addressed. Presentation slides

include information needed to give

a thorough understanding of the

topic; content is accurate and

sequenced in a clear, logical way.

Presentation

Design (Group)

Slides generally lack visual appeal and

are text-heavy with little or no visuals

and/or exhibit an overuse of color or

animations. Media, (e.g., images), if

used, are rarely cited on each slide. No

theme is evident and the presentation

appears disjointed rather than unified

and/or frequent written errors on the

slides.

Slides generally include a mix of white

space, visuals, and/or text but not

consistently and/or some overuse of

color or animations. Media (e/g.,

images), if used, may not be

consistently cited to give proper

attribution. Theme (e.g., template) is

not consistently evident throughout

the presentation and/or some written

errors on the slides.

Slides are effectively designed with

visual appeal including white space,

visuals, and minimal text for the most

part. Color and animations are used

appropriately. Media (e.g., images), if

used, are generally cited to give proper

attribution. Theme (e.g., template) is

evident in the presentation for the

most part to produce a cohesive

presentation and/or little written

errors on the slides.

Slides are visually well designed,

aesthetically pleasing with

appropriate use of white space,

visuals, and minimal text, on each

slide. Color and animations are used

judiciously. Media (e.g. images), if

used, are always cited on the slide

to give proper attribution. Theme

(e.g., template) is evident

throughout to produce a highly

cohesive presentation. Basically free

from written errors on the slides.

Timeliness and

Length of

Presentation

(Group)

Presentation is completed after the

deadline and/or substantially lacks the

required length.

Presentation is completed by the

deadline, but just falls short of the

required length.

Presentation is completed by the

deadline and meets the required

length.

Presentation is completed before

the deadline and meets or exceeds

the required length (5-7 slides).

Contribution to

Group

(Individual)

Group member rarely participated or

contributed to the project towards

achieving the project goals and

meeting the deadline; did not share

workload fairly.

Group member participated in the

project but emphasis was in

completing own work; allowed others

to assume leadership and/or may

have not shared workload fairly

towards achieving the project goals

and meeting the deadline.

Group member participated in the

project and shared the workload;contributed to the development of one

or more slides; worked towards

achieving the project goals and

meeting the deadline.

Group member participated fully in

the project and shared the workload

fairly; contributed to the

development of one or more slides

and assisted in editing others’ slides

to produce a polished presentation.

Demonstrated leadership to

facilitate and achieve the project

goals and meet deadline.

aep c1 rubric - student version

Documents