advancing glycemic control in an inpatient setting · nice-sugar: intensive vs conventional glucose...

30
Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting 1

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jun-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting

1

Page 2: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Background

2

Page 3: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Diabetes Statistics

CDC Nat’l Diabetes Fact Sheet, 2014WHO. Diabetes Action Now. 2004.

3

Page 4: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Prevalence of Obesity & Diabetes (U.S. Adults Aged > 18 Years)Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2)

Diabetes

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

4

Page 5: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Number and Percentage of U.S. Population with Diabetes, 1958-2009

Perc

enta

ge w

ith D

iabe

tes

0

5

10

15

20

25

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1958 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 02 06

Num

ber w

ith D

iabe

tes (

Mill

ions

)

YearPercentage with Diabetes Number with Diabetes

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

5

Page 6: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Significance• The Center for Disease Control reports 29.1 million people

(9.3% of the U.S. population) have diabetes

• Diabetes is 7th leading cause of death

• 20-50% of inpatients have diabetes or hyperglycemia

• 1 in 4 patients admitted to hospitals have a known diabetesdiagnosis

• 30% of patients with diabetes have 2 or more hospitaladmissions per year.

1: Umpierrez et al J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 978-82.2. CDC Nat’l Diabetes Fact Sheet, 2014

6

Page 7: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Why Does this Matter?• Significant impact on morbidity

and mortality– New hyperglycemia, higher in

hospital death rate– Missed diabetic diagnosis,

readmit 30.6% (vs 9.4%)– (Noncardiac) perioperative risk

of death increased with an ORof 1.19 for every 1mmol/Lincrease in BG

Robbins JM, Webb DA Med Care 2006; 44:292-6.Noordzji et al Eur J Endocrinol 2007; 156: 137-42. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:3001-3009

7

Page 8: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Why does this matter?• Regulatory Interest

– Emerging Metrics for CMS

• NQF2362, Hyperglycemia (2 values >200)

• NQF2363, Hypoglycemia (any value <40)

8

Page 9: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Number of US Hospital Discharges with Diabetes as Any-Listed Diagnosis

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Data and Trends. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/dmany/fig1.htm. accessed September 11, 2008.

9

Page 10: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Hyperglycemia and Mortalityin the Medical Intensive Care Unit

N=1826 ICU patients.Krinsley JS. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:1471-1478.

10

Page 11: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Mortality Increases With Increasesin Average BG Levels

Post-CABG

CABG, coronary artery bypass graft.

Furnary AP et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:1007-1021.11

Page 12: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Mortality Risk is Greater in Hyperglycemic Patients Without History of Diabetes

No History Diabetes, N=152,910

Mea

n BG

(mg/

dL)

111-145

146-199

200-300

>300

Odds Ratio

History Diabetes, N= 62,868

Odds Ratio

Falciglia M, et al. Crit Care Med. Epub ahead of print, Aug 2009.12

Page 13: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Hyperglycemia is Linked to Mortality Regardless of Diabetes Status

180-day Mortality in Patients Admitted for MI (%)

Rady MY, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:1558-1567.Ainla MIT, et al. Diabet. Med. 2005; 22:1321-1325.

13

Page 14: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Mortality in Inpatients with “New Hyperglycemia”

In-hospital Mortality Rate

(%)

Patients With Normoglycemia

Umpierrez GE, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87:978-982.

Newly Discovered

Hyperglycemia

Patients With History of Diabetes

14

Page 15: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Admission Hyperglycemia Is Also AssociatedWith Adverse Outcomes in Non-ICU Settings

% o

f Pat

ient

s

N = 2471

Non-ICU patients with community-acquired pneumonia

*P = .03; †P = .01. ‡ Complications include all in-hospital complications except for abnormalities of glucose.

Admission BG Level

McAlister FA et al. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:810-815.15

Page 16: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Outcomes Associated WithGlycemic Control in the Hospital

16

Page 17: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Benefits of Tight Glycemic Control: Observational Studies and Early Intervention Trials

Study Setting Population Clinical Outcome

Furnary, 1999 ICU DM undergoing open heart surgery 65% ↓ infection

Furnary, 2003 ICU DM undergoing CABG 57% ↓ mortality

Krinsley, 2004 Medical/surgical ICU Mixed, no Cardiac 29% ↓ mortality

Malmberg, 1995 CCU Mixed 28% ↓ mortalityAfter 1 year

Van den Berghe, 2001* Surgical ICU Mixed, with CABG 42% ↓ mortality

Lazar, 2004 OR and ICU CABG and DM 60% ↓ A Fib post op survival 2 yr

*RCT, randomized clinical trial.

Kitabchi & Umpierrez. Metabolism. 2008;57:116-120.17

Page 18: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Intensive Insulin Managementin Medical-Surgical ICU

Baseline group (n = 800)Krinsley JS. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004; 79:992-1000.

Glucose management group (n = 800)

18

Page 19: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Intensive Insulin Therapy in CriticallyIll Patients: SICU

Relative Risk Reduction (%)

Van den Berghe G, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359-1367.19

Page 20: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Severe Hypoglycemia in the MedicalICU - 2nd Leuven Study

Conventional Intensive(605) (595)

Hypoglycemia events # (%) 19 (3.1) 111 (18.7)

Two or more episodes 5 (0.8) 23 (3.9)

Glucose level (mg/dL) 31 ± 8 32 ± 5

Identified hypoglycemia as an “independent risk factor for death.”

Van den Berghe G, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:449-461.

20

Page 21: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

NICE-SUGAR Study OutcomesOutcome Measure

Intensive Group

Conventional Group

Morning BG (mg/dL) 118 + 25 145 + 26

Hypoglycemia (≤ 40mg/dL)

206/3016 (6.8%)

15/3014(0.5%)

28 Day Mortality (p=0.17) 22.3% 20.8%

90 Day Mortality (p=0.02) 27.5% 24.9%

Finfer S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283-1297.21

Page 22: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients

Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability Of Survival

% HR = 1.11 95 confidence interval:(1.01-1.23)

Finfer S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283-1297.22

Page 23: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Summary of the Clinical Trials• Hyperglycemia is associated with poor clinical

outcomes across many disease states in thehospital setting

• Despite the inconsistencies in the clinical trial results, good glucose management remains important in hospitalized patients

• It is likely that benefits on outcomes can bederived from somewhat higher glucose targets than previously proposed

• More conservative glucose targets would be predicted to result in lower rates of hypoglycemia

23

Page 24: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Landmark Trials: Why basal bolus?

• RABBIT2: Diabetes Care 2007– Patients with Type 2 diabetes not on insulin admitted

for medical diagnoses had better glycemic control withOUT significant adverse events on a combined basal-bolus insulin regimen

• RABBIT2 Surgery: Diabetes 2011– Patients with Type 2 diabetes undergoing surgery had

better glycemic control on a combined basal bolus regimen

24

Page 25: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

What Should We Take Awayfrom These Trials?

• Moderate glucose control, as opposed to near-normal control (tight), is likely sufficient to improve clinical outcomes in the ICU setting

• Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are markers of poor outcomes in critically and non-critically ill patients

• Importantly, the recent studies do not endorse a laissez-faire attitude toward inpatient hyperglycemia that was prevalent a decade ago

25

Page 26: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Background-The Evidence

CCU VanDenBer gheet al. NEJM 2001

Tight Control

NICESUGAR NEJM 2009

Moderate Control

SQ Sliding Scale Monotherapy

RABBIT2 Diabetes Care 2007

RABBIT2 Surgery Diabetes 2011

Basal Bolus Therapy

26

Page 27: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Current Recommendations

27

Page 28: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

ADA/SCC Target Glucose Levels in Critical Care/ICU Patients

• American Diabetes Association– Starting threshold of >180 mg/dL– Once IV insulin is started, the glucose level should be maintained between 140 and

180 mg/dL– Lower glucose targets (110-140 mg/dL) may be appropriate in selected patients – Targets <110 mg/dL or >180 mg/dL are not recommended

• Society of Critical Care Medicine– Starting threshold of >150 mg/dL and absolutely at 180 mg/dL– Use protocol to achieve low rate of hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL– Minimal excursions of <100 mg/dL

1. Diabetes Care 2016; 39 (Suppl. 1):S99-S1042. Crit. Care Med 2012 Vol 40, No 12. Guidelines for the use of an insulin infusion for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients

28

Page 29: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

ADA/Endocrine Society Target Glucose Levels in Non–Critical Care Patients

• Endocrine Society– Premeal glucose targets <100-140 mg/dL– Random BG <180 mg/dL– To avoid hypoglycemia, reassess insulin regimen if BG levels fall below 100 mg/dL– Occasional patients may be maintained with a glucose range below and/or above

these cut-points

• American Diabetes Association– Target 140 – 180 mg/dL– Certain groups <140 mg/dL– Certain groups with higher targets (terminally ill or comorbities)

Hypoglycemia = BG <70 mg/dLSevere hypoglycemia = BG <40 mg/dL

1. Umpierrez, GE; Hellman, R; Korytkowski, M; Kosiborod, M; Maynard, G; Montori, VM, Seley, JJ; Van den Berghe, G. (2012). Management of Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Patients in Non-Critical Care Setting: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. (2012). J ClinEndocrinol Metab 97: 16–382. Diabetes Care 2016; 39 (Suppl. 1): S99-S104

29

Page 30: Advancing Glycemic Control in an Inpatient Setting · NICE-SUGAR: Intensive vs Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. Kaplan–Meier Estimates For The Probability

Thank you

30