advances in testing and evaluation using human-biometric sensor interaction modules
DESCRIPTION
This is the presentation given at the Biometrics 2014 conference in London on October 21st, 2014TRANSCRIPT
BIOMETRICS 2014 – OCTOBER 21st
ADVANCES IN TESTING AND EVALUATION USING HUMAN-BIOMETRIC SENSOR
INTERACTION MODULES
•Examine the advances in Human Biometric Sensor Interaction model
• Current models
• Work ongoing in the Center
TALK TODAY
WHAT IS THE HUMAN BIOMETRIC SENSOR INTERACTION MODEL
•Traditional biometric testing
• Algorithm testing
• Well established metrics
• Well understood testing methodologies
•Operational testing
• Harder to do
• Access to environments
• Test methodologies dependent in some cases on the test
EVALUATION OF BIOMETRIC TESTING
•Training
• How do users get accustomed to devices?
• Can they remember how to use them?
• How do we provide good training to the users that has a consistent message?
GAPS IN BIOMETRIC TESTING
•Accessibility
• How many people know people who have problems with interacting with a biometric systems?
• How do we deal with accessibility and usability issues?
• Hearing and sight issues
GAPS IN BIOMETRIC TESTING
•Human Factors
• Testing and evaluating biometric systems by looking at how the users interact with the system
• Are performance results different in an operational environment than collect in a lab?
• Are these performance results due to the environment?
GAPS IN BIOMETRIC TESTING
• Is the error always subject centric?
• The role of the device?
• The role of the operator?
GAPS IN BIOMETRIC TESTING
TESTING ENVIRONMENTS ARE MORE COMPLEX
BACKGROUND OF THE HBSI MODEL
HBSI MODEL
•Development of the model
• Initially tested the model on iris, fingerprint
• Then introduced the “Dynamic HBSI model” in partnership with University of Kent, Canterbury
• On to more complex systems such as border gates and mobile platforms
HUMAN BIOMETRIC SENSOR INTERACTION
• Challenges are that devices and biometric systems are:
• Now multifaceted
• Variety of form factors, deployments, applications
• In the hands of more customers
• They become more demanding
• Technology development cycle is short
• Opportunity is how to test and evaluate the interactions without it becoming burdensome to a test facility
CHALLENGES / OPPORTUNITIES
•Border gate – the interaction is more than just presenting your biometric
• Heathrow last night….
USE CASE: BORDER GATES
•Token - the passport
•People traveling - potential incorrect passport
•Throughput issues - how to measure
CHALLENGES
•Token
•False Claim
•Attack
NEW ADDITIONS TO THE HSBI MODEL
• HBSI and Border Gates
• Building a border gate in the center to test various technologies, including iris, fingerprint, documents
• Throughput research
• Usability using the Kinect
• Novel performance metrics such as the Stability Score Index
TESTING AND EVALUATION RESEARCH
•Mobile devices are important as well, and we continue to work in this area:
• Wild testing
• Illumination / Noise / Controlled environments
• Voice, face, signature, palm, and multi-factor authentication
TESTING AND EVALUATION RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
TOKEN HBSI MODEL
TOKEN HBSI MODEL
TOKEN HBSI MODEL