advances in iris technology for wetland soil assessment...and j. p. megonigal, (eds). methods in...
TRANSCRIPT
w w w . e n s t . u m d . e d u
Martin C. Rabenhorst
Advances in IRIS Technology for Wetland Soil Assessment
Delaware Wetlands ConferenceJanuary 29, 2020
?
Identification and Delineation
• Hydrology
• Vegetation
• Soils
Also Restoration
Restoration Performance Standards(What are the metrics?)
• Hydrological Monitoring– Relatively straightforward– Multiple technologies available
• Vegetation – direct observation– Various indices available
Restoration Performance Standards• What do we do for Soils?
– Standards almost non-existent
– When present, often tied to morphological field indicators • Useful in evaluating natural systems
– Because they form slowly, and they persist
• Not appropriate for created or restored mitigation wetlands– Because they form slowly, and they persist
• Is there an alternative?
-500
-300
-100
100
300
500
700
4 5 6 7 8
Megonigal, J. P. and M. C. Rabenhorst. 2013. Reduction–Oxidation Potential and Oxygen. Pp 71-86. In R. DeLaune, R. Reddy, C. R. Richardson, and J. P. Megonigal, (Eds). Methods in Biogeochemistry of Wetlands. Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 10, Madison, WI.
Perhaps more realistic
NTCHS-TS
IRIS Technology(Indicator of Reduction In Soil)
IRIS Technology began as . . . Tubes
• Fe Oxide paint is applied to ½ inch schedule 40 PVC tubing while the tube is on a lathe device to ensure an even distribution of the paint.
• Pilot hole made for each IRIS
tube
• IRIS Tubes inserted into the soil
• The soil becomes anaerobic
• Microbes oxidizing OM seek
alternate e- acceptors
• Fe oxides on IRIS tubes utilized
as e- acceptors
• As Fe(III) in paint is reduced to
Fe(II), it dissolves
• Zones where Fe paint has been
removed is visible and can be
documented and quantified.
Fe(OH)3 + 3H+ + e- ---> Fe2+ + 3H2O Soluble
+3
Typically 5 replicates per plot
Soil Redox Conditions are Notoriously Variable
Documenting and measurement of coating removal
• The Challenge – Obtaining 2 dimensional information from a 3 dimensional object!
Mylar grids (+/- 3%)
Documenting and measurement of coating removal
• The Challenge – Obtaining 2 dimensional information from a 3 dimensional object!
Mylar grids (+/- 3%)
Summary of Strengths/Benefits
• Documents soil biogeochemical processes (reduction)
• Relatively easy to use (in contrast to measureing Eh).
– Install for 1 month, extract, measure.
• Integrates conditions over one month (not a snapshot)
• Conceptually simple
• Can view vertical changes within the soil
Challenges/Issues that have emerged with IRIS Tubes
1) Accurate Data - difficulty in acquiring a 2 dimensional image from a 3 dimensional cylindrical structure;
2) abrasion or scratching of the tubes during transport or upon installation (especially in sandy or dense soil conditions);
3) Issues with storage and expense of shipping and transport due to their size and weight;
4) general environmental/sustainability concerns related to using large quantities of non-reusable plastic tubing.
IRIS Innovation #1 – Films• Lightweight flexible coated PVC film is deployed
using a polycarbonate tube.
• The films . . . .
– Are flat, can be scanned or photographed for analysis
– Are lightweight and low volume
• The tube . . . .
– facilitates the installation of the film into the soil,
– protects the film during transport and installation,
– is 100% reusable.
• The Innovation
– figuring out how to deploy flexible films!
24” (60 cm) 50 cm
0.010” (10 mil; 0.25 mm) Rigid Vinyl Film
3”
IRIS Innovation #1 – Films
Loading films into delivery tubes
Deployment of films
Pilot hole Tube with film inserted into pilot
hole
Tube removed and film
expanded to pilot hole
Top (Plan) View
Film Expands
Example #1
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0 50 100
De
pth
(cm
)
Percent Removed
Individual Films
00004B.jpg 00007B.jpg
00008B.jpg 00011B.jpg
00013B.jpg Mean
Median Threshold
0-30cm Depth
30
15 cm contiguous zone within the upper 30 cm showing maximum removal
30
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0 50 100
Dep
th (c
m)
Percent Removed15 cm Running Averages
Individual Films15 cm Running Averages
00004B.jpg 00007B.jpg
00008B.jpg 00011B.jpg
00013B.jpg Mean
Median Threshold
Depth of Interest
% Removal
15 cm Zone 39.6 15.4 42.1 24.7 23.7
Y Y≥30%
30
Do a majority (3/5) have ≥30% paint removed?
Example #2
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0 50 100
De
pth
(cm
)
Percent Removed
Individual Films
00017B.jpg 00018B.jpg
00021B.jpg 00022B.jpg
00025B.jpg Mean
Median Threshold
0-30cm Depth
30
15 cm contiguous zone within the upper 30 cm showing maximum removal
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0 50 100
Dep
th (c
m)
Percent Removed15 cm Running Averages
Individual Films15 cm Running Averages
00017B.jpg 00018B.jpg 00021B.jpg 00022B.jpg 00025B.jpgMean
% Removal
15 cm Zone 35.5 46.0 68.6 38.0 22.0
Y Y Y Y≥30%
30
Do a majority (3/5) have ≥30% paint removed?
IRIS Innovation #2 – Mn Coating
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
4 5 6 7 8
Eh
pH
O2-H2O
NO3-N2
birnessite - Mn+2
pyrolucite - Mn+2
NTCHS-TS
Ferrihydrite - Fe+2
Goethite - Fe+2
(OR
P)
Stiles et al 2010.
The Problem
More easily/quickly reducedBetter indicator of important processes?
3”
Solution Achieved• Two years in the lab
• Lot’s of testing
FeMn
Rabenhorst, M. C. and K. A Persing. 2017. A Synthesized Manganese Oxide for Easily Making Durable Mn-Coated IRIS Tubes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 81:233–239. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2016.10.0348Rabenhorst, M.C. and J. Post. 2018. Manganese Oxides for Environmental Assessment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 82:509-518 doi:10.2136/sssaj2017.08.0256.
Zone 1 Fe Zone 2 Fe Zone 3 Fe Zone 1 Mn Zone 2 Mn Zone 3 Mn
Example Data
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
3/27 4/3 4/10 4/17 4/24
De
pth
(cm
)
Low
Mid
High
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0 10 20 30Days
March 27 - April 24
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
cm
cumulative days
saturated
Ongoing Testing of Mn-Coated IRIS
• Multiple sites
– Multistate project (VA, MD, DE, WV, PA, MA, RI, WY)
– Multiple projects in Maryland
– Projects coordinated with COE (VA, PA)
• Multiple years
• Currently Analyzing and Synthesizing Data
• Hoping to prepare a summary and proposal later this year
IRIS Technology - Summary• Documents actual wetland soil processes (functional
assessment) A reasonable soil performance standard– Shows wetland soils are doing what they are supposed to do– Microbially reduction of Fe oxides (and now Mn oxides)
• Becoming more commonly used – moved from the periphery into mainstream in hydric soils studies
• The appeal:– Ease of use– Conceptual simplicity– Approval of by the NTCHS (Fe-coated devices) – Some regulatory agencies (MDE; beginning to be recognized by COE)
• New Developments– System for delivering PVC films
• addresses issues/problems with IRIS tubes
– Advent of Mn Oxide coatings • more closely related to some important environmental/ecosystem services
Stop by Poster #29
Thank You
w w w . e n s t . u m d . e d u