[advances in agronomy] volume 85 || crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil...
Post on 11-Dec-2016
220 views
TRANSCRIPT
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT FOR NUTRIENT
CYCLING AND IMPROVING SOIL
PRODUCTIVITY IN RICE-BASED CROPPING
SYSTEMS IN THE TROPICS
Yadvinder-Singh,1 Bijay-Singh1 and J. Timsina2
1Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India2CSIRO Land and Water, Griffith NSW 2680, Australia
I. Introduction
II. Availability of Crop Residues in Rice-Based Cropping Systems
III. Management Options for Crop Residues
IV. Crop Residue Decomposition
A. Kinetics of Crop Residue Decomposition
B. Factors AVecting Residue Decomposition
C. Fallow Period and Crop Residue Management
V. Crop Residue Management EVects on Nutrient Availability in Soils
A. Nitrogen
B. Phosphorus
C. Potassium
D. Sulfur
E. Micronutrients
VI. EVect of Crop Residues on Soil Properties
A. Soil Fertility
B. Chemical Properties
C. Physical Properties
D. Biological Properties
E. Crop Residues for Reclamation of Salt-AVected Soils
VII. Biological Nitrogen Fixation
VIII. Phytotoxicity Associated with Crop Residue Incorporation into
the Soil
IX. Weed Control and Herbicide EYciency
X. Emission of Greenhouse Gases
A. Methane
B. Nitrous Oxide
C. Mitigation Strategies
XI. Agronomic Responses to Crop Residue Management
A. Rice–Wheat Cropping System
B. Rice–Rice Cropping System
C. Rice–Legume Cropping System
D. Other Rice-Based Cropping Systems
269
Advances in Agronomy, Volume 85Copyright 2005, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
0065-2113/05 $35.00
270 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
I. INTRODUCTION
Rice is the most important crop in Asia, where more than 90% of all rice is
grown and consumed (Blake, 1992). About half of the total area planted to
rice is irrigated, and it accounts for the three-fourths of global production
(Huke and Huke, 1997). In tropical Asia, rice–rice constitutes an important
annual crop rotation. In the subtropical Asia, rice and wheat are grown in
rotation in more than 13 million hectares in the Indo-Gangetic plains of
South Asia (India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan) and on similar hectarages
in the basin of the Yangtze river in China (Timsina and Connor, 2001). In
addition to wheat, other crops grown in rotation with rice are barley, oats,
maize, sorghum, legumes (mung bean, peanuts, soybean, lentil, chickpea),
oilseeds (mustard, rapeseed), potato, sugarcane, and cotton.
Nutrient cycling in the soil–plant ecosystem is an essential component of
sustainable productive agricultural enterprise. Although during the last three
decades fertilization practices have played a dominant role in the rice-based
cropping systems, crop residues—the harvest remnants of the previous
crop—still play an essential role in the cycling of nutrients. Incorporation
of crop residues alters the soil environment, which in turn influences the
microbial population and activity in the soil and subsequent nutrient trans-
formations. It is through this chain of events that management of crop
residues regulates the eYciency with which fertilizer, water, and other
reserves are used in a cropping system. Another feature of rice-based crop-
ping system in the tropics is the inherent conflict between maximizing short-
term production at minimum cost versus providing sustainable health and
long-term productivity of the soil. One reason for this conflict is the general
below-average economic condition of the farmers practicing rice-based crop-
ping systems. In the tropics, crop residues have, in fact, played a pivotal role
in the maintenance of soil resources at acceptable levels because these are the
major sources of C inputs.
Tropical agricultural ecosystems are distinct from temperate ones in
terms of biological degradation of soils, which results in reduction in organic
matter content due to decline in the amount of C inputs from biomass
(Stewart and Robinson, 1997). Tropical soils vary widely in their properties
and are generally poor in native soil fertility and productivity. The removal
of crop residues leads to low soil fertility and thereby decreased crop
XII. Summary and Conclusions
XIII. Research Needs
References
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 271
production. Organic materials such as crop residues oVer sustainable and
ecologically sound alternatives for meeting the nutrient requirements of
crops. In addition to their role as the primary source of C inputs, crop
residues, and the way they are managed, have a significant impact on soil
physical properties (Boyle et al., 1989).
Future increase in food production in the tropics will only be possible
through improvement in soil productivity. Increased concern for the envi-
ronment and increased emphasis on sustaining soil productivity has resulted
in major interest in the maintenance and improvement in soil organic matter
in recent years. Proper management and utilization of crop residues and
other agricultural wastes will constitute an important factor in achieving this
objective. With widespread use of combine harvesters, crop residues (mainly
rice and wheat) largely remain in the field and must be managed to provide
the greatest advantages.
The increasing constraints of labor and time under intensive agriculture
have led to the adoption of mechanized farming in rice-based cropping
systems. For example, under highly intensive rice–wheat cropping system in
northwestern India, combine harvesting of rice and wheat fields, which leaves
large amounts of crop residues in the fields, is now a common practice. As
crop residues interfere with tillage and seeding operation for the next crop,
farmers often prefer to burn these residues. In addition to causing environ-
mental pollution, burning results in large losses of organic carbon and plant
nutrients. In recent years, the concept of soil quality has been suggested as a
tool for assessing the long-term sustainability of agricultural practices
at local regional, national, and international levels. Crop residue manage-
ment is known to aVect either directly or indirectly most of the soil quality
indicators—chemical, physical, or biological. It is perceived that soil
quality is improved by the adoption of sound crop residue management
practices. For example, Karlen et al. (1994) evaluated several soil quality
indicators and developed a soil quality index, which had values of 0.45, 0.68,
and 0.86 for removal, normal, and double residue treatments, respectively.
In comparison with green manures and legume residues, cereal straws are
relatively poor with respect to N and P content. Thus, crops sown immedi-
ately after the incorporation of residues of cereal crops suVer due to defi-
ciency of plant-available N. Addition of fertilizer N to the decomposing
residues only partially oVsets the immobilization process. Therefore, a major
problem encountered in the profitable utilization of cereal crop residues is
the occurrence of microbial immobilization of soil and fertilizer N (Mary
et al., 1996). Suitable manipulations of processes such as nutrient immobili-
zation are an important component of an eYcient crop residue management
program. For example, allowing adequate time for decomposition of crop
residues before planting the next crop can be beneficial in alleviating adverse
eVects due to N immobilization and phytotoxicity.
272 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
According to one estimate, more than 1000 million tonnes of cereal
residues are being produced annually in the developing world (FAO,
1999). If crop residues could be better managed, this would directly improve
crop yields by increasing soil nutrient availability, decreasing erosion, im-
proving soil structure, and increasing soil water holding capacity. Crop
residues can also lead to negative eVects on crop production in the short
term because of N immobilization and possible release of phytotoxic com-
pounds. Considerable research has been conducted in the last few decades
relating residue management to soil chemical, physical, and biological prop-
erties and consequent fertilizer management practices needed for successful
crop production. In this chapter, we have tried to use this knowledge to
make recommendations and conclusions for crop residue management in
rice-based cropping system. We have not attempted to review all available
literature; only pertinent data sets have been used to substantiate diVerent
conclusions that emerge from the literature. There may be two diVerent
systems of crop residue recycling: (1) when residues are applied directly to
the soil and (2) when residues are first allowed to decompose and are used as
compost. We have focused our attention mainly on the in situ incorporation
of crop residues left naturally in the field under rice-based cropping systems.
A special situation is created by the planting of green manure crops in a crop
rotation and increasing the amount of crop residues at planting time of the
next crop. The use of crop residues as green manures has already been
reviewed extensively (Buresh and De Datta, 1991; Yadvinder-Singh et al.,
1991) and is not included in this chapter. Similarly, depending on the scale
considered, although manures, diVerent organic by-products, animal and
human wastes, and food processing wastes originate mainly from harvested
plants, these are not categorized as crop residues in this chapter. The
challenge is to (1) scientifically understand the short- and long-term eVects
of diVerent crop residue management on the cycling of C, N, and other
nutrients, and (2) develop technologies for crop residue management that
are agronomically beneficial, environmentally friendly, and do not add extra
costs.
II. AVAILABILITY OF CROP RESIDUES IN RICE-BASEDCROPPING SYSTEMS
Rice, wheat, corn, soybean, barley, rapeseed, and potato are the major
residue-producing crops. Asia is the major producer of crop residues—
52.6% of the world residues production occurs in Asia. Rice, wheat, and
corn are the major crops, contributing about 84% of the total production of
crop residue in Asia. On a global basis, these seven crops produced 2956
Table I
Residue Production (�103 t) by Rice and DiVerent Crops Grown in Rotation with Rice in the
Tropics in 1998a
Crop Asia Africa South America World
Rice-straw 771,804 25,968 24,153 844,782
Rice-husk 154,361 5194 4831 168,956
Wheat 379,788 27,395 25,539 946,734
Barley 34,097 6753 2141 208,229
Sugarcane 53,855 8561 41,880 125,227
Cotton 6378 315 69 6801
Oats 2424 342 1604 51,604
Corn 166,205 38,729 54,626 604,013
aData pertaining to residue production was computed by multiplying grain yield data reported
by FAO (1999) with straw:grain ratios reported by Larson et al. (1978) for South America and
by Bhardwaj (1995) and Beri and Sidhu (1996) for Asia and Africa.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 273
million tons of residues in 1998; rice residues were around 1000 million
tons (FAO, 1999). Production of residues by di Verent crops that can be
grown in rotation with rice in di Verent countries is shown in Table I. Rice
contributes about 34.3% of the total residue production, which is 1.2 times
more than wheat. Reliable quantitative estimates of crop residues in tropical
countries are, however, lacking. Below-ground residue production has often
been ignored due to the di Yculty in measuring it. In India, an attempt has
been made to arrive at a figure based on estimates of crop yields and
knowledge of the harvest index of di Verent crops. For example, an estimate
for India was made by Bhardwaj and Gaur (1985) by assuming that all
residues generated were left in the field and that nutrient availability from
this component followed mineralization of 50% per cropping cycle. Average
yields of irrigated rice will have to increase from 4.9 t ha �1 in 1991 to about
8 t ha�1 in 2025 (Cassman and Pingali, 1995). If rice cropping is intensified at
this scale, grain yield and total biomass production will increase by about
60% during the next 30 years. Our rough estimates indicate that the expected
increase in biomass production will potentially increase the amount of
C remaining in straw and roots by about 90 million t year �1 and that of
N by about 1.8 million t year �1 (Doberman and Witt, 2000). This represents
an enlarged sink for CO2 but also a greater potential source for CH4
emission.
Globally, about 31, 26, and 154% of N, P, and K, respectively, of the
fertilizer consumption in 1998 were found in crop residues (FAO, 1999).
Residues of seven leading crops in all the continents contained about
18.8 million tons of N, 2.9 million tons of P, and 24.0 million tons of
K. An estimate of the quantity of N, P, and K contained annually in
Table II
Estimates of N, P, and K ( � 103 t) in Residue Produced by DiVerent Crops Grown in Rotation with
Rice in the Tropics in 1998a
Crop
Asia
Africa and
South America World
N P K N P K N P K
Rice 4862.4 771.8 4600.0 327.8 52.5 446.1 5345.6 849.5 5321.7
Wheat 1898.9 265.9 2354.7 308.1 37.1 417.6 5650.9 662.7 7758.2
Barley 221.6 30.7 235.3 59.9 8.4 73.4 1520.9 220.9 2374.1
Sugarcane 226.2 43.1 360.8 211.9 40.4 338.0 526.0 100.2 839.0
Cotton 64.4 9.6 63.8 4.4 0.6 4.2 69.5 10.3 68.5
Oats 15.3 3.9 40.0 12.3 3.1 32.1 325.1 82.6 851.5
Corn 781.2 216.1 1229.9 788.4 148.7 1013.1 5393.0 984.8 6824.3
aEstimates of N, P, and K in crop residues were computed by multiplying residue yield data
given in Table I with N, P, and K contents in straw reported by Larson et al. (1978) for South
America and by Bhardwaj (1995) and Beri and Sidhu (1996) for Asia and Africa.
274 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
the residues of major crops grown in rice-based rotations in di Verent con-
tinents is presented in Table II. These estimates are based on average
nutrient concentrations in crop residues as reported by Larson et al.
(1978) for Europe, South and Central America, and Oceania and by Beri
and Sidhu (1996) and Bhardwaj (1995) for Asia and Africa. The values
reported in Table II do not include nutrients contained in roots. The crop
residue N is available to the extent of 41% in Asia followed by 28% in North-
central America, 15% in Europe, 11% in South America, 4% in Africa, and
only 1% in Oceania. In addition to N, P, and K, crop residues also contain
substantial amounts of secondary and micronutrients. The fertilizer equiva-
lent value of field residues for nine Indian crops worked out to be 760,000
tons, a sizeable and significant figure (Bhardwaj and Gaur, 1985). In China,
straw yield of cereals has been calculated as 621.6 million tons per year, and
20–30% is commonly returned to fields following harvest (Compilatory
Committee, 1990).
III. MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR CROP RESIDUES
There exist several options for managing crop residues. These include
being removed from the field, left on the soil surface, incorporated into the
soil, burned in situ, composted, or used as mulch for succeeding crops.
Throughout the tropics there is little recycling of crop residues in the
field—these are either harvested for fuel, animal feed, or bedding or are
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 275
burned in the field. Crop residues removed from the field can also be used
as bedding for animals, a substrate for composting, biogas generation or
mushroom culture, or as a raw material for industry. Local conditions
determine the disposal method. Currently, in China, North Vietnam,
India, Bangladesh, and Nepal, complete removal of straw from the field is
widespread in areas with hand harvest and great demand for straw as fodder,
as fuel, or for industrial purposes, causing large nutrient export from rice
fields. Open-field burning of rice straw is predominant in areas with combine
harvesting (northern India, Thailand, parts of China) or where manual
thrashing is done in the field (Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines,
southern Vietnam). In many parts of the tropics, crop residues are burned in
the field due to the ignorance of farmers about their value and lack of proper
technology for in situ incorporation of residues (Samra et al., 2003). For
example, in the intensive rice–wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic
plains of South Asia, crop residues, particularly rice straw, are not used as
animal feed and are disposed of by burning. This is a cost-eVective method
of straw disposal and helps to reduce pest and disease populations resident in
the straw biomass, but it also causes pollution by releasing CO2, N2O, NH3,
and particulate, leading to global warming and health concerns (Kirkby,
1999). It also reduces the number and activity of soil microbes. The magni-
tude of C and nutrient loss during burning is influenced by the quantity of
residue burned and the intensity of the fire. Complete burning of rice straw
at 470 8C in muZe furnace resulted in 100, 20, 20, and 80% losses of N, P, K,
and S, respectively (Sharma and Mishra, 2001). The corresponding losses
due to burning of wheat straw were 100, 22, 22, and 75%. The losses of
nutrients were less due to incomplete burning of the crop residues in open air
under field conditions: 88.6% N, 1.8% P, 17.5% K, and 25.3% S for wheat
straw and 89.2% N, 5.5% P, 19.9% K, and 20.5% S for rice straw, as
compared to complete burning. No loss of micronutrients was noted
during incomplete burning of straw. The temperature of heating was more
important than the duration of heating.
In the Philippines, Indonesia, and parts of China, heaping of rice straw in
the field at threshing sites is common. Heaping the straw in successive
quadrants of a field each season is recommended to even out nutrient
distribution. The straw decomposes slowly, largely aerobically, and can be
easily spread and incorporated into the soil at the beginning of the next
season. Not much is known about the rate at which straw in heaps decom-
poses or about the loss of N via denitrification or loss of N and K through
leaching.
Because of air pollution concerns and nutrient losses, the burning of
residues is now being reconsidered in many regions of the world (Ocio
et al., 1991; Miura and Kanno, 1997). However, in double- or triple-cropped
rice-based systems with sustained flooding, incorporating straw may reduce
276 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
yields (Cassman et al., 1995). The crop residues can impede seedbed prepa-
ration and contribute to disease and weed problems. There are currently few
options for rice straw because of its poor quality for forage, bioconversion,
and engineering applications (Jenkins et al., 1997). Rice growers are there-
fore seeking alternative disposal options, such as incorporation of the straw
into the soil. The incorporation of rice residues and continuous flooding has
become common in tropical soils through intensification of rice cropping
practices (Cassman and Pingali, 1995).
In addition to introducing an extra cost, rice straw incorporation
in association with flooding likely impacts soil fertility through nutrient
and pest interactions (Cassman et al., 1995, 1997; Olk et al., 1996) and
environmental quality through greenhouse gas emissions (Bossio et al.,
1999; Delwiche and Cicerone, 1993). In rice–wheat cropping systems, too,
management of rice straw, rather than wheat straw, is a serious problem,
because there is very little turn-around time between rice harvest and wheat
sowing.
Incorporating the crop residues into the soil and allowing them to decom-
pose returns to the soil almost all the nutrients in the straw. The common
practice of burning the residues can have a net short-term beneficial eVect on
the N supply to subsequent crops but a deleterious eVect on overall N supply
and soil C. In North America and Europe, incorporation of cereal straw is
being considered as an alternative to burning because of concern over the
adverse environmental impacts of burning (Prasad and Power, 1991).
With the advent of direct drilling, there is now much interest in the
possibility of direct drilling of wheat into rice stubble—either the full stub-
ble, or after removal or burning of the header tailings. Current research in
Punjab, India shows that sowing into stubble using no-till seed drill is
impaired by blockages with the loose straw and inadequate closure of the
seed slots. Bed planting provides new opportunities and challenges for
stubble management in rice–wheat systems, which need to be addressed.
Conservation tillage and mulch farming techniques have proven useful
in the highly erodible soils of the Loess Plateau of China (Zhiqiang et al.,
1999). Keeping in mind both socioeconomic and biophysical factors, there is
a need to develop conservation tillage systems for a wide range of rice-
based cropping systems, soils, and agroecological environments. Use of
crop residues as mulch is important to the development of soil-specific
conservation tillage systems in the upland soils of the tropics.
DiVerent residue management technologies or strategies need to be devel-
oped at a regional level to fit diVerent rice-based cropping systems and to
accommodate the management diversity required within a single farming
enterprise. Estimates of relative costs of diVerent options must be developed,
as the most attractive choices might have significant impacts on environmen-
tal quality through their eVects on microbial processes that determine
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 277
the magnitude of C storage in the soil, methane emission into the atmo-
sphere, and long-term soil fertility. Incorporation of straw in the soil is the
management option dealt in detail in this chapter. After the crop is har-
vested, the straw is spread on the land and incorporated into the soil by
disking or plowing.
IV. CROP RESIDUE DECOMPOSITION
Decaying of crop residues starts as soon as the residues come into contact
with the soil. The process of decomposition is controlled by the interaction
of three components: the soil organisms or biological processes, the quality
of crop residues, and the physical and chemical environment. The combina-
tion of these components determines not only the rate of decomposition of
crop residues but also the end product of the decomposition process. The
amount of plant materials decomposed in the soils is determined by the loss
of dry weight of these plant materials buried in the soil or by the evolution
of CO2 from plant materials, either unlabeled or 14C or 13C. Burying of
rice straw in soil has been reported to accelerate the decomposition in
comparison with placing the straw on the soil surface (Kumar and Goh,
2000). Residues are managed diVerently; e.g., residues can be placed on the
surface, mixed into the soil, or confined in mesh bags within the soil. Surface
placement or heterogeneous distribution reduces the residue–soil contact as
compared with a homogenous distribution. This may aVect the decomposi-
tion dynamics. Knowledge of such eVects is important when results from
diVerent studies are being compared and is essential when developing
and calibrating decomposition models. It is also important when assessing
the eVects of tillage practices resulting in diVerent degrees of residue–soil
contact, e.g., no-till ploughing and rotovating. The degree of contact be-
tween crop residues and the soil matrix, as determined by the method of
residue incorporation, aVects decomposition dynamics under both natural
and experimental conditions. A dearth of information exists regarding straw
decomposition under upland conditions and its eVect on long-term
N availability in temperate regions.
A. KINETICS OF CROP RESIDUE DECOMPOSITION
Crop residues left in the field after harvest are the raw materials for
humus formation and may represent a significant supply of nutrients to
subsequent crops. Knowledge about residue decomposition is, therefore,
278 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
essential for management of agroecosystems. Most of the work on decom-
position of crop residues has been carried out in temperate soils (Kumar and
Goh, 2000). Soil C content depends on the amount of C that leaves the soil
through decomposition, erosion, or leaching. Under normal circumstances,
most of the C is lost from the system through decomposition. Kinetic models
of decomposition have commonly used some form of the first-order equation
(Molina et al., 1983). Although a single rate constant has been used to
describe decomposition over the long term in the field or laboratory (Havis
and Alberts, 1993; Schomberg et al., 1994b; Kuo et al., 1997), most short-
term laboratory studies have shown that crop residues contain two or more
decomposition fractions (Gilmour et al., 1985; Ajwa and Tabatabai, 1994).
In cases in which two or more fractions exist, decomposition can be de-
scribed by a sequence of first-order equations that allow all fractions to
decompose at the same time (simultaneous model).
The change of C in the soil can be expressed mathematically in one kinetic
rate constant of decomposition:
Ct ¼ C0e�k1t þ Cae
�k2t; ð1Þ
where Ct is the amount of soil C at time t, C0 is the amount of soil C at time
0, k1 is the decomposition rate constant (day�1) of the total soil C pool
before amendment of C added, Ca is the amount of C (crop residue) added,
and k2 is the added C. The decomposition process is often viewed as a series
of first-order reactions for various C fractions, each with its own size and
decomposition rate decomposition rate constant (day�1) (Jenkinson and
Rayner, 1977; Parton et al., 1988). The rapid and slow fractions with a
characteristic slope and intercept can be mathematically represented as two
simultaneous first-order reactions:
% decomposed ¼ % rapidð1 � exp½�k1t�Þ þð100 �% rapidÞð1 � exp½�k2t�Þ; ð2Þ
where % rapid is the amount of crop residue organic C in the rapid fraction,
(100�% rapid) is the amount of crop residue organic C in the slow fraction, k1
is the rapid-fraction first-order rate constant, k2 is the slow-fraction
first-order rate constant, and t is the elapsed time. The percentage of the
crop residue C remaining is 100 minus % decomposed in Eq. (2).
The rate constant increased with temperature and was significantly lower
under flooded conditions (Devevre and Howarth, 2000). The rate of decom-
position of rice straw at 25 8C under flooded conditions was as low as the
rate of decomposition of rice straw at 5 8C under nonflooded conditions.
Under nonflooded conditions at 15 and 25 8C, the model described two pools
of decomposable C (C1/k1 and C2/k2). The first pool (C1) in the nonflooded
treatment at 25 8C represented 30% of the straw C with a turnover time
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 279
of 12.5 days; the second pool (C2) represented 36% of the straw C with
a turnover time of 100 days. The corresponding values at 15 8C were
24% with a turnover time of 17 days and 53% with a turnover time of 333
days.
Under flooded conditions, only one pool of C could be described using
the equation. At 25 8C, C mineralized represented 52% of the straw C with a
turnover time of 50 days against 46% of the straw C at 15 8C with a turnover
time of 100 days. The most apparent reason for only one pool of decompos-
able C in flooded treatment was that recycling of waste products from
fermentative metabolism extended the availability of labile sources of C.
From the amount of C mineralized in the flooded treatments, it is evident
that the C2 pool (recalcitrant C compounds: cellulose, lignin, and microbial
melanins) was partially degraded and contributed to the total C mineralized.
The study indicated that the conversion of C2 straw components to C1
components under fermentive conditions most likely increased the C utiliza-
tion eYciency of the more recalcitrant C2 pool under flooded conditions.
The larger biomass, the simultaneously lower total amount of C mineralized,
and the higher eYciency of substrate C conversion to microbial biomass
(yield factor) in the flooded soil supported these observations (Devevre and
Howarth, 2000). These researchers reported values of C1 and C2 of 1086 and
1324mg C g�1 and k1 and k2 values of 0.08 and 0.01 day�1 under nonflooded
conditions, respectively. The C1 and k1 values for flooded soil were 1916 mg
C g�1 and 0.02 day�1 incubated at 25 8C.
If management changes are desired to achieve an increase in total soil C or
soil organic matter (SOM), Eq. (2) allows for two major options: increase
C input or reduce decomposition rates. Virtually no studies have explored a
reduction in decomposition rates in intensive lowland rice systems, and
hence no literature review can be presented.
Table III shows that rates of crop residue decomposition depend on
residue type, length of decomposition period, and climatic conditions.
Cheng and Wen (1998) studied the decomposition of rice straw over a
10-year period in two soils with diVerent mineralogical characteristics
in fields under upland and submerged conditions in China. Using the
first-order equation for residue decomposition, they calculated annual min-
eralization rates (k) of 0.127 under upland and 0.106 under submerged
conditions in yellow-brown soil (pH 7.7). The corresponding rates in red
soil (pH 4.6) were 0.159 and 0.0948. The half-lives of residual C in the two
soils were 4.4–5.5 years under upland and 6.5–7.3 years under submerged
conditions. The percentage of organic C retained in two soils under upland
and submerged conditions was 29.3–31.3% after year 1 and 7.92–11.6% in
year 10 in the yellow-brown soil and 33.5–35.2% in year 1 and 7.48–13.0%
in year 10 in the red soil. Mineralization of residual organic N followed
the same pattern as residual C. More N from plant material was retained in
Table III
Decomposition of DiVerent Crop Residues in DiVerent Laboratory and Field Studies
Reference
Type of
study
Method used
and experimental
conditions
Crop
residue Duration
Decomposition
(%)
Cookson et al.
(1998)
Field Litter bag Wheat straw 90 days 36
Barley straw 90 days 42
Saini (1989) Field Litter bag Rice straw 197 days 73
Reddy et al.
(1994)
Field Litter bag Rice straw 330 days 90
Ghidey et al.
(1985)
Field Wheat straw 10 months 36
Soybean 10 months 74
Sunflower 10 months 61
Saviozzi et al.
(1997)
Field Litter bag Soybean 1 year 66
Sunflower 1 year 73
Rape 1 year 75
Kaboneka et al.
(1997)
Laboratory Soybean 30 days 67
Wheat straw 30 days 39
Martin et al.
(1983)
Laboratory Rice straw 14 days 14
90 days 46
1 year 90
Yadvinder-Singh
et al. (2004b)
Field Litter bag Rice straw 10 days 23
20 days 35
40 days 51
77 days 61
280 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
the yellow-brown soil than in the red soil. Rice straw mineralized more
slowly under submerged conditions than under upland conditions.
Buyanovsky and Wagner (1997) described the C decomposition from
wheat straw using nonlinear regression to fit a two-component exponential
model. This relationship could be used to calculate the percentage of the
residue C remaining in the soil at any specified time. The first component
represents the rate of mineralization of the readily decomposable fraction.
This includes the simple sugars, soluble proteins, hemicellulose, and cellu-
lose. The second component represents the mineralization of the resistant
products of microorganisms. The half-life of the first component was 18 days
and that of second component was 433 days. The humification coeYcient for
wheat straw was 0.24.
Mishra et al. (2001a) studied the C and N mineralization from wheat
straw using the nylon mesh bag technique in a silty loam paddy soil. Wheat
straw decomposed at a faster rate initially for 2 weeks, and the rate of
decomposition (measured as loss in weight of straw) slowed down thereafter,
probably when soluble carbohydrates and proteins were exhausted. Within
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 281
2 weeks, 30.7 and 25.3% of wheat straw in the bags had decomposed in the
wheat straw plus green manure and wheat straw alone plots, respectively.
The green manuring accelerated the decomposition of the wheat straw by
lowering the C:N ratio of the decomposing material and by stimulating the
microbial population to carry out the decomposition. By the end of 22 weeks,
82–86% of the wheat straw was decomposed. The practice of wheat straw
incorporation in conjunction with green manure holds promise for improv-
ing the soil productivity in rice–wheat cropping systems. The decomposition
of wheat straw followed the first-order kinetic model. The decay rate con-
stant (k) for the wheat straw was 0.013 day�1 and the half-life was
60 days. The C loss could account for 48–49% of the weight loss during
22 weeks. The other constituent of weight loss from wheat straw could
be soluble components such as K, Cl, and organic substances released as
intermediate products during decomposition. Up to 90% of K can be lost
from the crop residues within a few weeks after incorporation into the soil.
Zhu et al. (1988) reported that about 75% of wheat straw was decomposed in
about 150 days under field conditions in China.
Using the nylon mesh bag technique, Mishra et al. (2001b) noted three
phases in the decomposition of rice straw in a silty loam soil during wheat
growing season. The first phase lasted for 5 weeks, during which the rate of
decomposition was relatively faster (38% of the rice residue decomposed),
followed by the second phase of slow rate of decomposition from the 6th to
the 15th weeks (22% of the rice residue decomposed), which may partly be
attributed to the prevailing low air temperatures, followed by the third phase
of fast rate of decomposition up to 23 weeks (19% of the rice residue
decomposed) due to the rising air temperatures. By the end of 23 weeks,
79% of the rice straw was decomposed. The decomposition of rice straw
was satisfactorily described by the Douglas and Rickman (1992) model
(R2 ¼ 0:97). The computed values of fN and k were 1.356 and �0.00045
CDD�1, respectively, where CDD is cumulative degree days. Witt et al.
(1998), using the litter bag technique, reported a 56% decrease in rice crop
residues within 56 days after incorporation at IRRI, Philipines.
Kanazawa and Yoneyama (1980) observed that the decomposition of rice
straw occurred in two phases in a clayey soil under flooded and upland
conditions in a laboratory at 30 8C. During the first 2 to 4 months of
incubation, the dry weight decreased by half. This was followed by a long
period of very gradual weight decrease. After 12 and 24 months, about 70
and 75% of the initial weight of rice straw, respectively, was lost under both
flooded and upland conditions. The above decay pattern has two phases:
rapid C loss in the first few months and then slow loss in the subsequent long
period. The period of rapid decay seems to be almost coincident with the time
of high population of bacteria and fungi. This study showed that the fungi
are the main agents in the decomposition of organic materials under upland
282 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
conditions. In contrast, anaerobes are the main agents in the course of
residue decomposition under flooded conditions, and the breakdown of
cellulose and lignin may be slow under such decomposing systems. Under
field conditions, soil moisture conditions may change from time to time, and
this may cause the shifting participation of diVerent microorganisms during
plant residue decomposition. The rate of decomposition was slightly higher
under flooded than under upland conditions, but the pattern of residue
decomposition was similar under the two moisture regimes. The residue
decomposition trend was closely related to the changes in the microbial
population (bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes) under flooded conditions.
On the other hand, under upland conditions, significant correlations were
observed between residue weight loss and bacteria or fungi, but not between
residue weight and actinomycetes. This suggested that the fresh crop residues
added to soil are a good substrate for microbial activities. Though the
numbers of microbes were small under flooded compared to upland condi-
tions, aerobic microbes may play some role in the decomposition process of
rice residues in the early incubation periods when the O2 concentration in the
soil is high. In the early incubation period, addition of rice straw caused an
increase in the microbial numbers under both flooded and upland condi-
tions. The decomposing ability of the anaerobes under flooded conditions
may be high enough to decompose the plant materials to a similar extent as
that of the aerobes under upland conditions. The numbers of microorgan-
isms in upland soil were larger than under flooded conditions, and the
addition of rice residues brought about a vigorous increase in the numbers,
especially of actinomycetes and fungi.
B. FACTORS AFFECTING RESIDUE DECOMPOSITION
In tropical systems, mineralization rates are potentially higher because of
high soil temperatures during cropping season, particularly at the time of
incorporation of residues. Several reviews have summarized the factors
aVecting crop residue decomposition, particularly in temperate climates
(Kumar and Goh, 2000; Parr and Papendick, 1978; Prasad and Power,
1991; Smith et al., 1992). We include here only a brief commentary on the
pertinent factors of crop residue decomposition that have relevance to rice-
based cropping systems in the tropics. Carbon and nitrogen cycling are
mainly caused by changes in the frequency, amount, type, and mode of
recycling of crop residues; the frequency, length, and intensity of wetting
and drying cycles, that is, disturbances that cause severe shifts in microbial
activities and also aVect soil physical properties; and the O2 supply to the soil
during rice growth, that is, the amount of irrigation water percolating
through the soil and the intensity of soil reduction processes.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 283
There are three main factors that aVect crop residue decomposition in the
soil: (1) crop residue factors, (2) edaphic factors, and (3) management
factors. The development of an eVective crop residue management program
depends on a thorough understanding of the ways in which these factors
influence the decomposition process. It has been recognized that organic
residue decomposition and hence soil organic matter dynamics are a
direct result of the physiocochemical environments, e.g., aeration (aerobic/
anaerobic, soil structure) and the quality of the resource acting through their
regulation of the decomposer community.
Crop residue chemical composition plays an important role in determin-
ing decomposition rates. Thus, in order to predict the decomposition and
nutrient mineralization patterns of plant residues, it is essential to under-
stand their constitution in terms of soluble and resistant fractions. Early in
the decomposition process, rapid loss of simple sugars and amino acids may
occur within a few hours to a few days, while polysaccharides, proteins, and
lipids decompose at much slower rates. Lignin makes up 5 to 30% of crop
residue material and is more resistant to decomposition than other plant
constituents. Lignin is an important substrate for soil humus formation due
to its resistance to decomposition.
Janzen and Kucey (1988) found that diVerences in decomposition rates of
crop residues were positively correlated with crop N content. There was no
significant relationship reported between decomposition rates and C:N ratio,
water-soluble C, lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose content of crop residues.
Using a perfusion system, Villegas-Pangga et al. (2000) observed that the
CO2 release rates in 30 rice varieties varied; the percentage of C released
from straw ranged from 15.4 to 38.4% in 42 days. There was an inverse
relationship (R2 ¼ 0.6) between cumulative C release and C:N ratio and a
direct relationship between digestible organic matter (DOM) and cumula-
tive C release. A straw quality index (SQI) was developed to describe the
decomposition rate of the rice straw as follows:
SQI ¼ �56:85 þ ð11:68 �% NÞ þ ð1:25 �% DOMÞ þ ð2:59 �% ligninÞ;R2 ¼ 0:81: ð3Þ
These findings suggested that SQI is a practical tool for assaying the quality
of the straw materials to predict their usefulness in crop residue management
systems. Despite a twofold diVerence between varieties in the amount of
C evolved over 20 days, the proportion of nutrient release did not diVer
significantly between them.
The availability to microbes of C and N contained in crop residues along
with lignin content greatly influence decomposition rates and N availability
to plants (Vigil and Kissel, 1991). It is generally accepted that residues with
low N content or a high C:N ratio decompose more slowly than those with
284 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
a low C:N ratio or high N content (Magid et al., 1997; Parr and Papendick,
1978). Christensen (1986) found that 44% of wheat straw containing 0.92%
N decomposed during the first month but only 7% of the straw containing
0.4% N decomposed during the same period of incubation. Luo and Cheng
(1991) found that the number of days required for 50% mass loss of crop
residues was significantly correlated with the N content of the residue.
Decomposition rates are normally greater for legume residues (low C:N
ratio) than those for cereal residues (high C:N ratio) (Ladd and Foster,
1988).
Although N content and C:N ratio are useful in predicting residue de-
composition rates, they should be used with some caution. Reinertsen et al.
(1984) and Stott and Martin (1989) indicated that the C:N ratio of straw was
not a good decomposition index. De Haan (1977) found no relationship
between percentage of N in added plant residue and the rate of decomposi-
tion. Gilmour et al. (1998) observed that initial (0–2 weeks) decomposition
was related to crop residues N and C:N ratio, while subsequent decomposi-
tion was not related to these factors. Since C:N ratio does not indicate
the availability of the C and N to the microorganisms, crop residue decom-
position based on available C and N seems to relate more closely to
field observations than decomposition based on total C and N contents
(Mtambanengwe and Kirchmann, 1995).
The concentration of polyphenol is generally greater in mature resi-
dues than in green leaves (Fox et al., 1990; Palm and Sanchez, 1991).
The rate of plant residue breakdown depends on the relative proportion
of these fractions. Hagin and Amberger (1974) estimated the half-life of
sugars, hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin as 0.6, 6.7, 14.0, and 364.5 days,
respectively. Other factors such as lignin, hemicellulose, and polyphenol
content should also be considered for predicting decomposition of crop re-
sidues. Lignin is known to be a recalcitrant fraction and is highly resistant to
microbial decomposition (Mellilo et al., 1982). Many workers have found
that increasing lignin concentration reduces the decomposition rate and
nutrient release from plant residues (Fox et al., 1990; Tian et al., 1992).
Saini et al. (1984) reported that the rates of decomposition of stubbles of
rice, wheat, and rape were lower than those of their straws due to high
ash and lignin contents. Polyphenol concentration in plant tissue also
reduces its rate of decomposition by binding to protein and forming com-
plexes resistant to decomposition (Vallis and Jones, 1973). Since polyphenols
have diVerent properties with respect to binding N-containing compounds
depending upon their molecular weight (Scalbert, 1991), these govern de-
composition and N release in some studies but not in others (Vanlauwe et al.,
1996).
The decomposition rate of plant residues cannot be predicted from a
single property of the organic material. When considered simultaneously,
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 285
these properties can predict the decomposition rate from a wide range of
plant residues. In some studies, polyphenol:N and (lignin þ polyphenol):
N ratios have been correlated with residue decomposition and nutrient
release (Constantinides and Fownes, 1994; Fox et al., 1990; Palm and
Sanchez, 1991; Tian et al., 1995). It has been suggested that the polyphe-
nol:N ratio may serve as a short-term index for green manures, while the
(lignin þ polyphenol):N ratio could be used for more mature or woody plant
materials (Palm, 1995).
1. Residue Particle Size
The accessibility of plant residues to soil microbes is of primary impor-
tance in their rate of decomposition. The particle size of the residue can
provide diVerent degrees of accessibility, which in turn aVect residue decom-
position rates as well as the mineralization-immobilization process. Gener-
ally, small particles decompose faster than large particles because the
increased surface area and better distribution in soil will increase the suscep-
tibility to microbial attack (Jensen, 1994). Angers and Recous (1997) studied
the eVect of particle size (0.03 to 10 cm) of wheat straw (C:N ¼ 270) on the
decomposition in a silt loam soil incubated at 15 8C. Early decomposition
(3–17 days) was faster for the small-sized particles (0.06–0.1 cm), followed by
the large-sized particle (5 and 10 cm). After 102 days, the very fine particles
(<0.1 cm) showed the greatest and the intermediate-sized classes (0.5–1.0 cm)
the lowest amount of C mineralization. On the other hand, finely ground
particles of ryegrass (C:N ¼ 9) decomposed at a lower rate than intermedi-
ate-sized classes. It was hypothesised that greater accessibility and availabil-
ity of N were responsible for the higher rate of decomposition observed for
finely ground wheat straw, while a physical protection of finally ground
residues was probably involved in the observed reverse eVect of ryegrass
with a low C:N ratio. Puig-Gimenez and Chase (1984), however, observed
no significant eVect of length of straw on its decomposition. The eVect of
plant residue particle size on C and N mineralization may thus be an
interaction between clay content, secondary metabolic products, plant resi-
due chemical composition, period of decomposition, and fanual activity
(Kumar and Goh, 2000).
2. Environmental Factors
Environmental conditions can aVect residue decomposition rates (Parr
and Papendick, 1978). Generally, decomposition rates are faster in tropical
areas and decrease as water availability and temperature decrease. Maxi-
mum activity of decomposers is near 30 to 35 8C and thus supports maximum
286 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
residue decomposition in this range (Roper, 1985; Stott and Martin, 1989).
Singh et al. (1995) found that 24.8–29.0% and 39.5–43.4% of the applied
C through rice and wheat residues was decomposed in 60 days at 258 and
40 8C, respectively.
Soil water content can dramatically influence crop residue decomposition
and nutrient cycling (Doel et al., 1990). The optimum water potential for
residue decomposition lies in soil water potentials between �30 and �100
kPa. Soil dried to a water potential of 10 MPa evolved CO2 at about one-half
the rate of soils incubated at optimum water content (�20 to �50 KPa)
(Sommers et al., 1981). Pal and Broadbent (1975) showed that the maximum
rate of decomposition of plant residues occurred at 60% water holding
capacity (WHC) and the rates decreased at either 30 or 150% WHC. The
lower rates of straw decomposition under lowland conditions are probably
due to limited aeration for microbial activity. However, Villegas-Pangga et al.
(2000) reported that there was 27–45% reductions in C evolution in rice straw
under anaerobic conditions compared to aerobic systems. These results sug-
gested that under flooded conditions, depletion of O2 decreases the decompo-
sition rate of straw but the initial rate of nutrient release is unaVected. This
uncoupling of C and nutrient release appears to be related to the more labile
components of the nutrients present in the plants and their physiological role.
Devevre and Horwath (2000) reported that flooding had a tendency to
reduce C mineralization, and the study showed that anaerobes recycled
fermentation waste products during the long-term incubation, resulting in
a lower net residue C mineralization in flooded systems compared to non-
flooded conditions. As a result, similar microbial production was observed
under flooded and nonflooded conditions even though anaerobes decom-
posed less straw C than aerobes. These results indicate that a significant
amount of decomposition occurred under flooded conditions, but because
substrate use eYciency was higher, less straw C was mineralized than under
aerobic conditions. Kinetic analyses of C mineralization curves confirmed
that C mineralized in the flooded treatment was mainly from labile pools,
with significant amounts coming from more recalcitrant pools, such as
cellulose and lignin depending on temperature.
Li and Lin (1993) reported that in the Wuxi province of China, decom-
position rates of rice straw were similar under upland and submerged con-
ditions. Drying and re-wetting conditions encountered under field situations
may also influence the decomposition of plant residues. Thus, Gestel et al.
(1993) found that soil drying and wetting increased the turnover of14C-labeled plant material. Nyhan (1976) summarized published data,
which showed that Q10 (the change in the rate of reaction for each 10 8C
change in temperature) for plant material decomposition averaged about 2.6
for temperatures from 12.5 to 40 8C. Later on, Howard and Howard (1993)
reported Q10 values from about 2.0 to 2.8 for soil respiration within the
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 287
10 to 20 8C temperature range. They also noted that the eVect was similar
across various soil moisture regimes.
3. Management Factors
The eVect of management is predominant in controlling the amount and
kind of plant residues returned to the soil and in determining the degree of
soil disturbance through tillage. Residues are managed diVerently; e.g.,
residues may be placed on the surface, mixed into the soil, or confined in
mesh bags within the soil. Surface placement or heterogeneous distribution
reduces the residue–soil contact as compared with a homogenous distribu-
tion. This may aVect the decomposition dynamics. Knowledge of such
eVects is important when results from diVerent studies are being compared
and is essential when developing and calibrating decomposition models. It
is also important when assessing eVects of tillage practices resulting in
diVerent degrees of residue–soil contact, e.g., no-till ploughing and rotovat-
ing. The degree of contact between crop residues and the soil matrix, as
determined by the method of residue incorporation, aVects decomposition
dynamics under both natural and experimental conditions.
Evidence from laboratory and field studies has suggested that the rates of
the decomposition of plant materials added to soil are proportional to the
amounts initially added (Larson et al., 1972). Generally, small amounts of
crop residues will decompose more rapidly than large amounts (Novak,
1974). However, Ladd et al. (1983) found the amount of 14C-labeled plant
material (Medicago littorallis) added was greater; the proportion of residual
organic C and N in soil was smaller.
Residue placement may be paramount in controlling the rate of crop
residue decomposition and nutrient cycling. Crop residue placement influ-
ences soil temperature, and water regimes indirectly influence microbial
activity and residue decomposition. Residue management practices that
involve intensive tillage and incorporation of residues increase residue de-
composition rates and loss of SOM. Residue incorporation eVects are diY-
cult to separate from tillage eVects because incorporation is accomplished
through some type of tillage operation. Decomposition rates of incorporated
residues (rice and wheat straw) faster than those of surface residues resulted
from greater soil–residue contact, a more favorable and stable micro-
environment, particularly soil moisture regime, and increased availability
of exogenous N for decomposition by microorganisms (Cogle et al., 1987;
Schomberg et al., 1994a). Important secondary eVects of tillage on the soil
microclimate include the influence of surface residue coverage on soil tem-
perature, water interception and infiltration, and the eVects of tillage-
induced changes in porosity and the eVects of soil structure on soil aeration
288 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
and water relations. Observed increases in organic matter with reduced
tillage systems are largely attributed to reduced decomposition rates of
surface residues compared to the rapid decomposition of incorporated resi-
dues (Schomberg et al., 1994b). However, the rate and degree of organic
matter accumulation associated with surface residues vary widely due to
diVerences in climate, soil type, and residue quality. Under conditions of
warm temperatures and increased water availability, SOM accumulation
from surface residues is reduced.
The depth of residue incorporation has also been shown to aVect
the decomposition of residues. Increasing the depth of residue incorpora-
tion from 50 to 200 mm resulted in a decrease in breakdown rate due to
less biological activity (Kanal, 1995). Likewise, the decomposition rate of
rice straw was reduced by 13% by increasing the depth of incorporation
of residues from 0–10 cm to 20–30 cm (V. Beri, Department of Soils, PAU,
Ludhiana, personal communication). In contrast, Breland (1994) found that
increasing the depth of incorporation up to 300 mm increased the decompo-
sition rate of residues, due to more favorable moisture regimes in lower
layers. Puig-Gimenez and Chase (1984), however, reported that straw
decomposition was not aVected by the depth of placement.
Crop residues managed previously can also significantly aVect the decom-
position of freshly applied crop residues. For example, Cookson et al. (1998)
observed that on a soil where wheat, barley, or lupin residues were previous-
ly managed for 3 years, wheat straw from the incorporated treatment had a
decomposition rate 50% greater than that from the burned or removed
treatment during 90 days.
4. Availability of Nutrients
Incorporation of crop residues increases the populations of all types of
macro- and microorganisms, and the new cells require all the essential
nutrients for their growth and activity. Residues of cereal crops such as
wheat, rice, barley, and maize have larger C:N ratios (low N contents) that
may require the addition of exogenous N in order for decomposition to
proceed. Mary et al. (1996) concluded that mineral N availability in soil is an
important factor controlling decomposition under field conditions. Accord-
ing to Jenkinson (1981), it is unusual for nutrients other than N to limit the
decomposition of plant materials in normal soils. Enhanced decomposition
rates of crop residues due to the application of N have been reported by
several workers (Bangar and Patil, 1980; Debnath and Sinha, 1993). In
contrast, no or even negative eVects of N added on decomposition and
microbial activity have also been reported (Cheshire and Chapman, 1996;
Clay et al., 1990; Hassink, 1994). The reduction in decomposition in the
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 289
latter studies was probably due to the adverse eVects of NH3 toxicity on
decomposers.
5. Soil Properties
Soil texture may aVect the decomposition of plant materials. Decomposi-
tion of crop residues was more rapid in soils with less clay content because
clay protected the organic matter from decomposition (Jenkinson, 1977;
Merckx et al., 1985; Ladd et al., 1996). As clay content increases, soil surface
area also increases which results in increased organic C stabilization poten-
tial. The role of clay in stabilizing organic matter appears to be more
important in warm soils, where decomposition occurs at higher rates.
Skene et al. (1997) showed that for high-quality substrates, physical protec-
tion by inorganic materials is a major limiting factor to decomposition,
whereas for low-quality substrates, chemical protection is the major limiting
factor. Hassink et al. (1993) reported that the texture influences the soil
physical environment, which further aVects microbial activity. Li and Lin
(1993) also stated that soil properties controlled the decomposition rates of
crop residues during the first 2 years at two diVerent locations in China. On
the other hand, Amato et al. (1987) could not observe a significant eVect of
soil properties on decomposition of wheat residues.
Soil pH aVects both the nature and the size of the microbial population,
both of which ultimately aVect the residue decomposition (Paul and Clark,
1989). In general, decomposition of crop residues proceeds more rapidly in
neutral than in acid soils. Consequently, the treatment of acid soils with lime
enhances the decomposition of plant residues (Condron et al., 1993). Like-
wise, soil salinity also aVects the residue decomposition through its direct
influence of osmotic potential on microbial activity or through alterations of
pH, soil structure, aeration, and other factors (Nelson et al., 1996). In the
absence of pH and aeration eVects, sodicity increased and salinity decreased
the decomposition of plant residues, but with no significant interaction
(Nelson et al., 1996). Jenkinson (1971) reported that the decomposition
pattern is not substantially aVected by soil properties or crop residue type
included in the study, and the patterns obtained in diVerent climates can
essentially be superimposed by using an appropriate rate constant factor.
Using the buried mesh bag technique, Henriksen and Breland (2002)
found that soil type had no eVect on decomposition of the easily degradable
clover residues, but cumulative C mineralization of barley straw after 52
days was less in the subsoil than in the topsoil by 12% of initial C. This study
showed the necessity of ensuring realistic conditions for the decomposer
microflora when studying eVects of substrate quality on decomposition
and when extrapolating the results for hemicellulose rich residues to field
290 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
conditions. The diVerences in decomposition as aVected by residue–soil
contact in laboratory experiments could be due to soil treatment before
incubation, for example, sieving, which seems to damage fungi in particular.
Thus, the diVerences may not be distinct under natural field conditions with
an undisturbed microflora.
C. FALLOW PERIOD AND CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT
In a traditional single-crop rice system, fallow periods between crops are
long and the soil is allowed to dry, resulting in re-oxidation of reduced
substances, more complete decomposition of added organic matter, and
large shifts in microbial communities. Similar changes occur in rice followed
by wheat or other upland crop systems. In contrast, in a double- or triple-
crop rice system, fallow periods are short, the soil is not allowed to dry and
re-oxidize completely, and large amounts of crop residues are returned to the
field more than only once per year. Fallow periods may range from very dry,
to dry-wet, to completely wet conditions and diVer in their length, but only
under drier conditions did a shallow early tillage accelerate soil N minerali-
zation during early growth stages of the rice crop grown thereafter
(Dobermann and Witt, 2000). It is therefore likely that years of intensive
rice–rice cropping lead to a decline in the steady-state soil redox potential
along with a gradual accumulation of reduced substances (Fe and organic
compounds), a change in the qualitative composition of SOM toward more
phenolic compounds, and possibly even an increase acidification of the
rice rhizosphere resulting from greater root-induced Fe2þ oxidation. Unfor-
tunately, we lack long-term experiments with rice-based systems of diVerent
cropping intensity in which such subtle changes with time have been
measured over periods more than 10 years.
In systems in which declining SOM content is a concern (rice-upland
crop), straw incorporation may be the only choice for maintaining or in-
creasing SOM content. In rice–rice (-rice) systems with short aerobic peri-
ods, organic matter management must focus on managing the quality of
soil organic matter, that is, avoiding the accumulation of highly complex
organic matter with slow N mineralization rates. In this case, the time of
incorporation of organic materials is more important than the amount.
Compared with the traditional method of wet incorporation shortly
before planting of the next rice crop, the potential benefits of shallow
incorporation of the rice straw shortly after the harvest of rice include
(1) accelerated aerobic decomposition of crop residues (about 50% of the
carbon within 30–40 days), leading to increased N availability (Witt et al.,
1998) and reduced CH4 emission; (2) re-oxidation of ferrous iron and other
Figure 1 EVect of decomposition period on the mass remaining of litter bag rice residue.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 291
reduced substances, leading to increased P availability; (3) reduced weed
growth; and (4) savings in irrigation water during land soaking for rice by
reducing cracking and bypass flow water losses in heavy clay soils. Early
incorporation of residues allows additional time for phenol degradation to
occur under aerobic conditions, thus possibly altering the rates of soil
organic matter formation and subsequent decomposition.
Using the litter bag technique, Yadvinder-Singh et al. (2004b) observed
that time of incorporation had a large eVect on the decomposition of rice
residue during the fallow phase (October–November) after rice harvest
(Fig. 1) in rice–wheat rotation in Punjab, India. At wheat seeding, the
mass loss of rice residue was 51% for a 40-day decomposition period,
compared with 35% for a 20-day decomposition treatment and 25% for a
10-day decomposition treatment. The amount of mass loss remained signifi-
cantly higher for the 40-day decomposition period compared to the 10-day
or 20-day period up to 72 days after seeding of wheat. At the end of the
study, no significant diVerence, however, was noted among the three
treatments.
The data for all three decomposition periods could be best described
using a single logarithmic equation:
Y ¼ 14:9 lnðXÞ � 8:74; R2 ¼ 0:951 ðn ¼ 15Þ; ð4Þwhere Y is the total decomposition period (days) and X is the percent mass
loss of rice residue. Equation (4) may prove useful in predicting residue
decomposition under soil and environmental conditions similar to those in
this study. Rice straw decaying for 0–10 days lost 2.45% of its initial mass
292 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
each day. In comparison, the values were 1.0% day�1 for 10–20 days and
0.8% day�1 for 20–40 days during fallow.
The N concentration of the rice residue increased continuously during
the 190-day decomposition period, indicating loss of C as CO2 and/or N
immobilization in the residue by microorganisms, which build up new micro-
bial protein from plant and soil N. The N content of rice straw at the time of
incorporation was 5.6 g kg�1, which increased to 14.8 g kg�1 at the end of the
study period. At the time of wheat sowing, residue N was significantly
lower (7.0 g kg�1) in the 10-day decomposition treatment than in the 20-day
(7.9 g kg�1) or 40-day (8.1 g kg�1) treatment. At the end of the study (150 days
after wheat sowing), the N concentration in rice residue was observed to be
similar (14.8 g kg�1) for 10-, 20-, or 40-day decomposition treatments.
Yadvinder-Singh et al. (2004b) observed substantial immobilization of
fertilizer N with straw incorporation at 10 days after fertilizer application in
treatments in which rice straw was incorporated at 0 and 10 days before
application of fertilizer compared to the no-straw treatment (Fig. 2). The
magnitude of immobilized N was influenced by the decomposition period of
rice straw prior to fertilizer application. Interestingly, immobilization of N in
the treatment where fertilizerN was applied concurrentlywith straw incorpora-
tion (0 day) always remained lower than the treatment without straw (Fig. 2).
Mineral N in the soil was significantly higher under the 20- and 30-day
pre-decomposition periods than under the no-straw treatment at all sampling
times. These data clearly demonstrated that incorporation of rice straw at
20 days or more before wheat sowing will minimize any adverse eVects on
crop growth due to N immobilization after straw incorporation (Fig. 2). This
Figure 2 EVect of pre-decomposition period of rice straw on mineral N (NH4 þ NO3)
dynamics in soil amended with 100 mg N kg�1 and incubated at 75% field capacity moisture
regime at 30 8C.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 293
study suggested a lower amount of N immobilization by rice straw containing
6.7 g N kg�1 when allowed to decompose for 20 or 30 days before fertilizer
N application comparedwith that reported for wheat and barley strawbyMary
et al. (1996). The results from the decomposition and N mineralization studies
suggested that rice residue is likely to have little adverse eVects on N availability
in the soil when it is allowed to decompose under aerobic conditions for at least
10 days before sowing of the next upland crop.
V. CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ONNUTRIENT AVAILABILITY IN SOILS
Rice straw is characterized by a high C:N ratio and abundant K, Si, and
C (Ponnamperuma, 1984). Wheat straw has comparable properties except for
low Si and low K concentration. The successful utilization of crop residues as
a nutrient source relies on manipulating the biological processes in the soil so
as to optimize nutrient availability with respect to plant demand.
A simplified model of the regulation of nutrient flux in the agoecosystem is
presented in Fig. 3. This conceptual model depicts the flow of carbon and
nutrients among organic residues, organic and inorganic pools in soil, and the
plant. Pathways of loss are also included. Decomposition and mineralization
of plant residue are mediated by both soil faunal and microbial populations.
Some of the carbon and associated nutrients are mineralized immediately
(pathway 1a) or are immobilized in the soil microbial pool (pathway 2a), later
to be transformed into other soil organic pools via microbial by-products
(3a). Recalcitrant plant material also may enter the soil organic pools directly
(3b). The carbon and nutrients held in the various soil organic matter pools
are subsequently decomposed and assimilated by soil biomass, resulting in
Figure 3 Conceptual model of nutrient pathways in crop residue amended soils (Myers
et al., 1994).
294 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
additional mineralization (1b). The inorganic nutrients released by minerali-
zation may be assimilated by soil biota via immobilization (2). Immobilization
occurs simultaneously with mineralization, and the rate at which nutrients are
available for plant uptake depends on the net balance between mineralization
(1a plus 1b) and immobilization (2). The inorganic nutrients may also be taken
up by plants (pathway 3), lost by leaching or volatilization (pathway 4), or
remain in the soil (Myers et al., 1994). The size of the inorganic pool depends
on the balance of the various processes that add to the pool (mineralization)
and those that subtract (immobilization, plant uptake, and losses).
The proportion of N transferred from the residue to the plant and the rate
at which it occurs are determined by the balance between the rates of the
various processes represented by these flux pathways. This balance is regu-
lated by a hierarchy of factors. Environment, which includes climate and
soil, is an overriding control and determines the rate of the transfer between
pools. The rates also vary depending on the quality of the decomposing
substrate. By manipulating the quality of crop residues, it should be possible
to manage nutrient release to coincide with the time course of the nutrient
requirements of the crop (Swift, 1987). When low-quality crop residues (low
N and P, high lignin or polyphenol contents) are incorporated into the moist
soil, nutrients become available to the plants. With high-quality residues,
nutrients are initially released rapidly in excess of plant demand with a risk
of nutrients such as N being lost via leaching or denitrification or a nutrient
such as P becoming chemically unavailable (Anderson and Swift, 1983).
A. NITROGEN
1. Kinetics of Nitrogen Mineralization–Immobilization
Mineralization and immobilization of N occur simultaneously in the soil.
Net rates of mineralization and immobilization are an integration of a
number of soil N processes and a number of factors, which act on the
interacting processes as well as directly on mineralization–immobilization.
Residues from rice, wheat, barley, maize, and other small grains with large
C:N ratios are noted for their initial N immobilization, which can negatively
aVect crop yields (Cassman et al., 1997; Christensen, 1986). Microbes
using the crop residues as an energy source compete with crop plants for
available N.
The addition of cereal residues often results in a net N immobilization
phase followed by a net re-mineralization phase (Muller et al., 1988; Nieder
and Richter, 1986; Robin, 1994; Yadvinder-Singh et al., 1988). Generally,
mineralization of N from low-N residues occurs only after 50–60% of
residues is decomposed or after the C:N ratio is below 30 (Christensen,
Table IV
Maximum Immobilization of Soil Mineral N Measured During Decomposition of Wheat/Rice
Straw under Laboratory Conditions
Reference Immobilized N (mg N g�1 C)
Simon (1960) 28.5
Guiraud (1984) 30.8
Reinertsen et al. (1984) 18.0a
27.0b
Bakken (1986) 15.1
Nieder and Richter (1986) 25.8
Robin (1994) 27.4
Beri et al. (1995) 35.0
aWithout N.bWith mineral N.
Modified from Mary et al. (1996).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 295
1986). A large number of papers have focused on N immobilization imme-
diately after straw incorporation under laboratory conditions and indicate a
narrow range of N immobilization values (Table IV). Under field conditions,
Mary et al. (1996) derived N immobilization values of 13.0, 24.3, and 32.0 mg
N g�1 added carbon under N0, N180, and N330 treatments, respectively. The
latter value was equal to the immobilization potential found with straw in
incubation studies. Mishra et al. (2001a) reported that the N content of
wheat straw increased from the initial level of 0.50% to 0.73% after 10 weeks
and to 0.88% after 22 weeks. The C:N ratio of wheat straw decreased from
90 to as low as 32 by the end of 22 weeks of decomposition period. During
first 2 weeks, 24% of the total N in wheat straw was released into the soil.
There was net immobilization between 3 and 10 weeks. After 10 weeks, net
N mineralization was noted in the study. By 22 weeks, apparent
N mineralization from wheat straw was 71%. The rate of N mineralization
was lower than that of C mineralization from wheat straw. It suggested that
incorporation of wheat straw at about 8 to 10 weeks before rice transplant-
ing can help to alleviate the adverse e Vect of wheat straw on rice growth due
to N immobilization. In another study, Mishra et al. (2001b) noted that
during the decomposition of rice straw, N content increased from 0.60 to
1.21% and the C:N ratio decreased from 70 to 21.3 with time. About 4.5% of
the total N present in rice straw was released within 5 weeks of its incorpora-
tion into the soil, and apparent N mineralization after 23 weeks was 57.5%
of the total N in the rice straw, of which more than 50% was mineralized
during the third phase.
Similarly, Yadvinder-Singh et al. (2004b) reported that the N content of
rice straw at the time of incorporation was 5.6 g kg�1, which increased to
296 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
14.8 g kg�1 at the end of the 190-day study period. At the time of wheat
sowing, residue N concentration was significantly lower (7.0 g kg�1) in the
10-day decomposition treatment than in the 20-day (7.9 g kg�1) or 40-day
(8.1 g kg�1) decomposition treatment. Rice residue appeared to have a brief
initial period of N release after incorporation. This study showed that for
every 10% increase in mass loss, there was about 2.75% (1.07 kg N ha�1)
release from the applied residue N. In this study, despite a substantial mass
loss of 69% residue, the amount of N release was small (6–9 kg N ha�1).
Residues go through several phases in their decomposition, with N dynamics
related to the stage or extent of mass loss. Using 15N-labeled rice residue,
Yoneyama and Yoshida (1977a) reported that 8% of the N in the rice leaf
sheath (8 g N kg�1) was mineralized in 30 days at 30 8C under upland
conditions in the laboratory.
In the tropics, the turnover of organic matter in flooded soils can be as
fast as that in aerobic soils. This causes net immobilization of N in flooded
rice soils after rice or wheat straw incorporation. A review of work on
interaction between decomposition of plant residues and N cycling in soils
showed that the amount of N immobilization can be large, and the intensity
and kinetics of N immobilization and subsequent mineralization depend on
the nature of plant residues and the type of associated decomposers (Mary
et al., 1996).
In a laboratory incubation study, rapid production of NHþ4 –N occurred
during the first week of incubation of untreated flooded soils, while in a soil
treated with rice straw only traces of NHþ4 –N were formed (Phongpan,
1987). However, during the subsequent 6 weeks, the accumulation of
NHþ4 –N was considerably higher in soil treated with rice straw than in
untreated soil. This suggests that NHþ4 –N was immobilized in the soil
amended with rice straw during the early stages followed by remineralization
in later stages. Similar observations have been made by Nishio et al. (1993),
who estimated a remineralization constant of 0.023 day�1 when 0.25 mM of
ðNH4Þ2SO4 was applied along with rice straw. Azmal et al. (1997) observed
that in rice straw amended soil (200 mg C per 100 g soil applied every 6
weeks) mineral N was immobilized immediately after each application of
rice straw due to its high C:N ratio. The immobilization increased until the
third application. This behavior was ascribed to the gradual accumulation in
soil of a portion of undecomposed organic N. Nieder and Richter (1989)
observed immobilization of about 30–40 kg N ha�1 in the soil after straw
incorporation.
Toor and Beri (1991) observed almost compelete immobilization of native
as well as applied N (120 mg kg�1) by the seventh day in a soil amended with
rice straw. At the end of 60 days of incubation, however, about 40 mg
mineral N kg�1 soil was remineralized. Patel and Sarkar (1993) observed
initial rapid rate and magnitude of immobilization of 15N-labeled urea in
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 297
three soils amended with wheat straw, and remineralization of immobilized
N occurred by 60 days. Singh et al. (1992) also found that about half of
N immobilized by rice straw was remineralized in 90 days after straw
incorporation. Yadvinder-Singh et al. (1988) observed that remineralization
of immobilized N in a soil amended with rice and wheat straw occurred
4 weeks after incorporation of residues at 35 8C under laboratory conditions.
Using 15N-labeled rice straw, Zhu et al. (1988) reported that about 1% of the
rice straw N was mineralized in 112 days.
Kawaguchi et al. (1986) observed that eventual mineralization of
rice straw N during 28 weeks of incubation period ranged from 17 to 24%.
Addition of rice straw also increased the mineralization of soil N due to a
priming eVect, which was estimated to be 30–100 mg N kg�1 soil. The degree
of the priming eVect correlated with the amount of mineralized rice straw N.
Incorporation of crop residue with low cellulose and high water-soluble
N contents results in more N being mineralized than had been added in
the residues, demonstrating this priming eVect (Bending et al., 1998).
Using 15N-labeled rice and maize straw, Wang et al. (2001) reported
that after a 112-day incubation period under submerged conditions, net
recovery of mineralized N from soil only accounted for 1.0–1.3% of the
straw N added to diVerent soils. About 2.0–4.3% of straw N was immobi-
lized by microbial biomass, and 0.2–14.2% was fixed by clay minerals.
Vertisol fixed a markedly higher amount of straw N than Ultisol. The loss
of straw 15N ranged from 29.7 to 46.3% during the incubation period. The
total amount of straw N mineralized during the 122-day incubation ranged
from 47.7 to 51.7%.
Kushwaha et al. (2000) reported that in residue removal treatment,
N mineralization rates were maximal during the seedling stage of crops
and then decreased through the crop’s maturity. In residue-retained treat-
ments, however, N mineralization rates were lower than in the residue-
removed treatments at seedling stage of both crops. At grain-forming
stage, the N mineralization rates in residue-retained treatments considerably
exceeded the rates in corresponding residue-removed treatments. Microbial
immobilization of available N during the early phase of crops and its pulsed
release later during the period of greater N demand of crops enhanced the
degree of synchronization between crop demand and N supply.
Using the first-order kinetics relationship, Mary et al. (1996) calculated
the maximum net immobilization at 51 kg N ha�1 and a rate constant of
0.031 day�1 in soil amended with wheat straw under field conditions. Islam
et al. (1998) estimated N mineralization potential (N0) under flooded condi-
tions at 35 8C for 12 weeks. The values of No for rice straw were 7 to 15 times
that of the control soil. The first-order rate constants for unamended soils
ranged from 0.35 to 0.52 mg N kg�1 week�1, and for rice straw-amended
soil, from 0.75 to 1.22 mg N kg�1 week�1.
298 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Dynamic computer models can be used to distinguish between immobili-
zation and mineralization of N and between availability and loss through
leaching and denitrification in soils treated with crop residues under field
situations.
2. Factors Affecting N Mineralization
The residue quality and availability of soil N are important determinants
of N mineralization–immobilization occurring during residue decomposi-
tion. Mineralization of organic N depends on the N requirements of the soil
microbial population, the biochemical composition of the decomposing crop
residue, and several soil and environmental factors. Crop residue manage-
ment can aVect N immobilization and stabilization processes important to
eYcient utilization of N from fertilizers, crop residues, and soil organic
matter. The availability of nutrients from crop residues depends to a great
extent on mineralization of nutrients from the crop residues in relation to
crop demand. Nitrogen mineralization is a crucial process of nutrient dy-
namics in the soil–plant system. It has been reported that the larger and
sustained microbial biomass found under flooded compared to aerobic
conditions may act to immobilize more N and make it less available for
plant uptake. Together with N losses, such as denitrification and leaching,
sustained flooding of soil may reduce the size of available N pools, as seen in
some areas of the tropics (Cassman et al., 1995).
a. Crop Residue Quality. It is well established that the chemical
composition of crop residue influences its rate of decomposition and
mineralization–immobilization in the soil and subsequent N uptake by the
crops (Jensen, 1997; Magid et al., 1997; Mary et al., 1996). The quality of
organic residues has been assessed by measuring diVerent biochemical prop-
erties that have been shown to delay or enhance the decomposition and
N mineralization processes. Incorporation of residues with low N contents,
such as rice, wheat, and barley, may result in microbial immobilization of
soil and fertilizer N, eVectively reducing N availability to plants.
Using 15N-labeled crop residues, Norman et al. (1990) found that N
mineralized from the time of residue incorporation until the rice harvest
from rice, wheat, and soybean straw was 9, 38, and 52%, respectively. The
respective amounts of residue N recovered by rice was 3, 37, and 62%
from those residues. Several workers have reported higher rates of N miner-
alization from crop residues with a lower C:N ratio and higher total
N content (Bending et al., 1998; Vigil and Kissel, 1991). Regression analysis
of the data showed that 72–75% of the variability in the measurement of
N mineralization from crop residues can be explained by using either the
C:N ratio or the square root transformation of the N concentration of
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 299
residues (Vigil and Kissel, 1991). The break point between net N mineraliza-
tion and net N immobilization was calculated to occur at a C:N ratio of 40,
which corresponds to 10 g N kg�1 residue (assuming residue carbon as 400 g
kg�1). The prediction of N mineralization was improved when regression
analysis included total N and the lignin:N ratio as independent variables.
The fitted equations provided an estimate of the maximum amount of N that
will potentially mineralize in a season from the incorporation of crop resi-
dues of diVerent N contents. Generally, mineralization of N from low-N
residues occurs only after 50 to 60% is decomposed or after the C:N ratio is
below 30.
But others have found quite diVerent results (Haynes, 1986). It is to be
expected that the significance of diVerent chemical parameters will depend
strongly on the condition (temperature and soil moisture content) under
which the experiments were conducted, the range of decomposability and
N concentration in the plant material, the N availability in the soil, and
whether the shorter or longer results are considered. When plant materials
with very diVerent decomposabilities are compared, lignin content is likely
to be an important parameter, as reported by Neely et al. (1991), whereas
when comparing young plant materials from young green manures it is
unlikely to show much relation to N release.
Polyphenol compounds have been shown to react with residue N and
render it unavailable for plant uptake (Palm and Sanchez, 1991), while lignin
is a not easily decomposable cell wall polymer. Azmal et al. (1996) observed
a negative relationship between N mineralized from crop residues and
the amount of cellulose and hemi-cellulose of added organic material. So
far, particle size has not been considered a quality parameter, but needs
attention, as a smaller particle size leads to higher substrate-decomposer
community contact, resulting in high decomposition and N mineralization.
Wide variation in the proportion of various constituents in crop residues
and their diVerential behavior in the soil after incorporation makes the
description of N release solely based on the C:N ratio of the residue too
simplistic (Jarvis et al., 1996). In a flooded soil, net N mineralization from
crop residues (legumes as well as cereals) was not correlated with N and the
C:N ratio, but it was correlated with the lignin:N ratio of the residue under
greenhouse conditions (Becker et al., 1994b). Similarly, initial soil NHþ4 –N
accumulation rates under field conditions were higher from residues
with a relatively low lignin:N ratio, suggesting that the lignin:N ratio of
the applied residue may be a suitable index for predicting N mineralization
rates in flooded soils. Quality components controlling N mineralization from
crop residues also change during decomposition (Bending et al., 1998).
While water-soluble phenolic content significantly correlated with net
N mineralization at early stages, C:N ratios and total N content were
correlated with net N mineralization toward the end of incubation
300 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
(6 months) only. In a field experiment, Clement et al. (1995) observed that
immediately after incorporation into wetland rice soil, N mineralization was
positively correlated with crop residue N content. However, at tillering, the
tannin:N ratio was best correlated with the rate of N release. Grain yield was
best predicted by the (lignin þ polyphenol):N ratio. This study emphasized
the importance of the interaction among chemical constituents of crop
residues in the dynamics of N release and uptake by rice.
b. Environmental Factors. Nitrogen mineralization is profoundly influ-
enced by temperature changes that are normally encountered under field
conditions. The majority of soil microorganisms are mesophyllic and prefer
moderate temperatures with optimum activity between 25 and 35 8C. Thus,
turnover of nutrients in plant residues would generally be accelerated in
tropical soils. Pal et al. (1975) suggested that the initial Q10 (2–3 days) for
N mineralization of crop residues recently incorporated into soil is > 2. Vigil
and Kissel (1995) reported that measured Q10 for N mineralization depended
on the C:N ratio of the residue and incubation time, indicating that for
predictive purposes a single Q10 value is inadequate for describing the eVect
of temperature on crop residue N mineralization. Honeycutt and Potaro
(1990) field tested the application of thermal units for predicting N minerali-
zation from crop residues. It was found that thermal units are valid for
predicting commencement of net mineralization of N from crop residues,
despite the harsh environmental conditions and wide temperature variations
to which these residues and soils were subjected.
Nitrogen transformations in flooded soils under rice are markedly diVer-
ent from those taking place in upland soils. The diVerence in the behavior of
N in upland and submerged soils is due to the diVerence in activity of
microorganisms functioning under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. In an
incubation experiment, Yoneyama and Yoshida (1977b) found that net
mineralization of soil N was depressed by the addition of rice straw, except
that the addition of leaf blade under lowland conditions gave more mineral
N at later stage than the unamended control (Table V). Under lowland
conditions, the amount of N immobilized in soil amended with rice straw
was small during the first week but increased substantially after 2 to 3 weeks.
Under upland conditions, the immobilized N reached its maximum during
the first week, but the amount of N immobilized was smaller than that under
lowland conditions. At 30 days of incubation, 26, 20, and 17% of total
N under lowland conditions and 14, 7, and 8% under upland conditions
were mineralized in leaf blades, stems, and leaf sheaths, respectively. This
suggests that mineralization of rice residue N takes place throughout the
decomposition of residue even if the net mineralization of N was not ob-
served by the incorporation of residue low in N content. The amount of
absorbed soil N in rice residue (influx) and the remaining original rice
Table V
Mineralization of Rice Residue in Soil under Upland and Lowland Conditions
Rice residue
Total N
added
(mg kg�1)
Incubation time (days)
2 5 10 30
Lowland conditions
Leaf sheath 32 2.8 4.5 5.3 5.3
Leaf blade 60 3.9 9.2 14.1 15.6
Stem 16.8 0.3 1.1 1.8 3.2
Upland conditions
Leaf sheath 32 0.8 1.3 1.4 2.5
Leaf blade 60 1.0 2.1 6.6 10.4
Stem 16.8 0.5 0.6 0.6 1.1
From Yoneyama and Yoshida (1977b).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 301
residue N (outflux) is more vigorous under lowland than under upland
conditions. Therefore, rice yields and N uptake will be greater under lowland
than under upland conditions. Kanazawa and Yoneyama (1980) observed
that mineral N in soil amended with 15N-labeled rice straw under upland
conditions remained at low levels compared with untreated control through-
out the 24 months of incubation. In flooded soil, the mineral N was lower in
straw-treated soil during the first 4 months, and the diVerences were small
between unamended and amended soil thereafter.
It is generally found that N mineralization is higher under anaerobic
conditions than under aerobic conditions (Ono, 1989). According to Liu
et al. (1996), higher mineral N levels in rice straw amended soil under
anaerobic compared to aerobic conditions possibly occurred because the
minimum need of microorganisms for release of ammonium N from crop
residues in flooded soil is about 0.5% compared with 1.7% in aerobic
systems. Thus, inorganic N is released in larger quantities in anaerobic
than in aerated soils, although the release rate may be slower. Mineralization
rate of N in crop residues is reduced at low soil water contents.
The eVect of soil temperature and water content on N mineralization can
be calculated by using a relationship derived by Andren and Paustin (1987).
A normalized time (equivalent to Qsum) was calculated as
TðnormalizedÞ ¼ tðrealÞ fðTÞ gð*Þ; ð5Þ
where f(T) is a correction factor due to soil temperature and g(*) is a
reduction factor due to soil water potential. The factor f(T) is a multi-
exponential function of temperature. It is set at 1 at a temperature of
25 8C. The eVect of soil moisture on N mineralization was described as
an exponential function of soil water potential. The combined eVect was
302 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
calculated as the product of the two terms, assuming that there were no
interactions between temperature and moisture. This approach enables the
comparison of field experiments diVering in climatic conditions to laborato-
ry experiments conducted under constant temperature and moisture. Mary
et al. (1996) found that when the normalized days were substituted to
real days, the diVerence in the kinetics of net N immobilization and
C decomposition in the soils where wheat straw was incorporated under
field conditions were not significant between two years (Fig. 4).
c. Placement of Crop Residues. Using 15N-labeled crop residues, Smith
and Sharpley (1990) found that surface placement of residues reduced
N availability as compared to soil incorporation, but the diVerences
were only equivalent to 1 to 7 kg N ha�1. Residue placement influences
N mineralization through an eVect on the microclimate of the residue.
Slower decomposition rates of surface residues may result in greater poten-
tial for immobilizing N for longer periods than for incorporated residues.
Schomberg et al. (1994b) reported that N immobilization period was longer
than 1 year for surface applied wheat and sorghum residues and about
4 months for buried residues. The maximum value for N immobilization
was 50% lower for buried residues. Although greater N immobilization may
occur with surface residues, subsequent N mineralization can occur within a
period that is optimum for crop utilization.
Residue incorporation with conventional tillage agroecosystems can
be characterized as bacterial-based food webs with fast rates of litter
Figure 4 (A) EVect of wheat straw on net immobilization of soil mineral N versus ‘‘normal-
ized’’ time. (B) Wheat straw C (fraction > 1mm) remaining in soil in the field experiments versus
‘‘normalized’’ time (Mary et al., 1996).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 303
decomposition and nutrient mineralization, while surface residues under no
tillage systems support fungal-based food webs that result in slower decom-
position and greater nutrient retention (Beare et al., 1996). Placement of
residues may play an important role in determining availability of soil N to
subsequent crops during the N immobilization-mineralization process.
d. Soil Type. Soil texture controls mineralization by (1) influencing
aeration/moisture status, (2) aVecting the physical distribution of organic
materials and hence potential for degradation, and (3) conferring some
degree of ‘‘protection’’ through an association of organic materials with
clay particles (Hassink et al., 1993). Becker et al. (1994b) observed that
residue N release in clayey soil was approximately twice that of sandy soil.
DiVerences in mineralization rates between soils would have an impact on
the fertilizer N requirement of the subsequent crop and the potential for
N loss due to leaching or denitrification. Using 15N-labeled wheat straw and
legume residues, Amato et al. (1987), however, observed that eVect of soil
properties and climate on the residual organic 15N was small. Decomposi-
tion and mineralization of crop residues, however, are inhibited under
strongly acidic conditions. For example, Fu et al. (1987) indicated that
N mineralization increased as soil pH increased from 5 to 7.
e. Soil and Fertilizer Nitrogen. Cereal residues generally possess low
N content and may require addition of exogenous N for decomposition to
proceed. From a series of experiments, Yoshida et al. (1973) inferred that
N mineralization in soil amended with rice straw increased with increasing
NHþ4 –N concentration up to 300 mg N kg�1 soil, but N mineralization
decreased when rates greater than 300 mg N kg�1 were applied. Mary et al.
(1996) concluded that immobilization intensity of crop residues expressed
per unit of mineralized carbon is reduced and N remineralization is delayed
in soils with low mineral N concentrations. Nitrogen availability in soil can
therefore strongly modify the mineralization–immobilization kinetics by a
feedback eVect. On bare plots, immobilization of mineral N by wheat straw
incorporation increased markedly by the addition of mineral N throughout
the decomposition. A better prediction of the evolution of mineral N in
soil may, therefore, require description and modeling of the respective
localization of both organic matter and mineral N in soil aggregates.
3. Effect of Crop Residues on Utilization of N by Crops
Availability of N from crop residues to subsequent crops is highly depen-
dent on decomposition rate, residue quality, and environmental conditions
(Fox et al., 1990). Application of crop residues has been shown to depress
304 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
the NHþ4 –N concentration in soil and flood water due to N immobilization
and consequential lower N uptake by rice compared with control (Huang
and Broadbent, 1988; Nagarajah et al., 1989). Rice is known to take up more
organic N than any other crop because (1) it takes up NHþ4 , amino acids, or
relatively high molecules of organic N, preferentially; (2) it has stronger
activity in competing with soil microorganisms than the other crops; (3)
it secretes organic substrates that support multiplication of microfauna,
resulting in rapid decomposition of organic residues; and (4) it has superior
Km (Michaelis constant), Vmax (maximum uptake velocity), and Cmin
(minimum concentration of a nutrient) for N uptake (Yamagata et al.,
1996). Thus, rice is expected to respond to crop residue N better than
other crops. Yoneyama and Yoshida (1977a) found that N uptake by rice
from residue-amended soil was at its peak during the intermediate stages of
growth, and N uptake from the fertilizer was rapid during early growth.
They recorded 25% N recovery from straw N by rice plants in 130 days.
Although contribution of 5 t straw ha�1 to the current N needs of rice is
relatively small, the long-term eVects may be substantial. For example,
Tanaka (1974), Chatterjee et al. (1979), and Kosuge and Zulkarnani (1981)
reported that continuous application of straw builds up soil organic matter
and ensures high N content and uptake and partial substitution of straw
N for fertilizer N.
Jiang et al. (1998) observed that N utilization by wheat in the presence of
wheat straw (4.5 t ha�1) was highest when N was applied in three equal splits
at sowing, tillering, and stem elongation. Guirad and Berlier (1971) reported
that the reduction in the N uptake from Ca(NO3)2 in the wheat straw-
amended plots was due to higher losses of NO3–N by denitrification, and
from (NH4)2SO4 it was caused by immobilization of N in the soil.
Malik et al. (1998) found that incorporation of wheat straw along
with green manure enhanced nutrient availability; and synchrony between
N release and plant uptake was best achieved in soil receiving straw
along with green manure. A temporary lag in N immobilization and
mineralization provided a N-conserving mechanism for the system. Broad-
bent and Nakashima (1965) followed mineralization and plant uptake of
N immobilized by application of straw. When N was added with the straw,
there were indications that remineralization of immobilized N was faster
than mineralization of N in the unamended soil. However, when no N was
applied with the straw, the results did not support the synchrony concept.
Support for the synchrony concept is found in the results of a field experi-
ment with flooded rice (Amarasiri and Wickramsinghe, 1988) in which rice
receiving a 60 kg N ha�1 fertilizer along with straw yielded about the same as
that receiving 90 kg N ha�1 as fertilizer alone. This role of straw may be
interpreted as one of N recycling in a system where losses from the mineral
N pool are potentially large and as such is a type of synchrony.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 305
Tanaka and Nishida (1996) observed that wheat straw decreased N uptake
by rice and increased the amount of 15N remaining in the soil at 17 days after
transplanting. At the booting stage, 6 days before heading, N uptake was
higher and the 15N remaining in the soil was lower in the treatments in which
wheat straw was applied than in unamended control treatment. It was
concluded that decrease in N uptake by wheat straw was caused by
N uptake inhibition and not by N deficiency in the early stages of rice
growth.
In a greenhouse study using 15N-labeled fertilizer, Masayna et al. (1985)
found that rice plants recovered 50–69% of applied fertilizer in the unamend-
ed soil and 45–53% in the rice straw-incorporated soil. In the second and
third crops of rice, recovery of residual N was slightly higher from rice straw-
amended soil than from unamended soil. Islam et al. (1998) found that large
amounts of mineral N pools were lost during the incubation that could not
be accounted for by microbial immobilization under field conditions. To the
contrary, Xu (1984) reported higher fertilizer utilization eYciency in rice
straw-amended soil (75.5 and 82.6%) than that in unamended light clay and
sandy loam soils (51.8 and 47.7%). This could be due to the increased
N immobilization and decreased losses of N via denitrification in residue-
amended soil (Craswell, 1978). Available data suggest that 10 to 20% of
N freshly supplied through cereal residues with a high C:N ratio (rice and
wheat straws) is assimilated by the rice crop, 10 to 20% is lost through
various pathways, and 60 to 80% is immobilized or stored in the soil under
field conditions (Koyama, 1981).
4. Losses of N
The presence of crop residues with high C:N ratios may also lead to
transformation of fertilizer or soil N into slowly available forms, which
may act as slow-release fertilizer and thereby improve N use eYciency.
Bird et al. (2001) reported that the total loss of N fertilizer, based on the15N isotope balance, was approximately 50% and was largely independent of
straw management practice. An increase in total soil microbial biomass in
combination with a large amount of added straw could have led to a
temporary strong sink for N fertilizer. The ensuing immobilization process
could lead to lower N fertilizer losses. Eagle et al. (2001) reported a decrease
in fertilizer N use eYciency with a concomitant increase in the plant avail-
able soil N following change in straw management from burning to in-
corporation. Only 1.8 kg ha�1 (3.5%) straw N was directly available to the
crop in the year following incorporation, and total N uptake increased by
23 kg N ha�1 5 years after straw incorporation. Huang and Lu (1996)
reported that heavy application of rice straw in combination with
306 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
N fertilizer at a C:N ratio greater than 40 would have a determental eVect on
the rice growth. Using 15N–labeled fertilizer, it was observed that total
recovery of N was reduced from 40.8% in no straw to 6.1% in straw
treatment with a C:N ratio of 40, but the total N loss was decreased from
13.7 to 5.5%. It was concluded from this study that for eYcient management
of rice straw and N fertilizer in flooded rice cultivation, it is advisable to
incorporate rice straw with a C:N ratio adjusted to <25.
a. Urea Hydrolysis and Ammonia Volatilization. Urea, the major fer-
tilizer N source, can be significantly less eYcient when used under soil and
climatic conditions conducive to NH3 volatilization. The rate of urea hydro-
lysis, a process mediated through soil enzyme urease, has a direct bearing on
losses of N via NH3 volatilization. The incorporation of crop residues causes
a significant increase in the soil urease activity (Gill et al., 1998b; Phongpan,
1987). Khind and Bajwa (1993) also observed that urea hydrolysis proceeded
more rapidly in the crop residue-amended soil than in the control soil. The
rate of urea hydrolysis increased with the increasing rate of crop residue and
with the length of decomposition period. The first order rate constants for
urea hydrolysis ranged from 0.021 to 0.024 h�1 after the application of
200 mg N kg�1 in the unamended soil and from 0.071 to 0.250 h�1 in the
rice straw-amended soil, depending upon the length of decomposition peri-
od. Gill et al. (1998a) reported that in wheat straw-amended soil, hydrolysis
of urea was completed in 6 days, compared to 12 days in the unamended soil
under flooded conditions.
The increased rate of urea hydrolysis on residue-amended soil may lead to
increased loss of N via NH3 volatilization. In a silt loam soil, application of
soybean straw increased the urea hydrolysis from 42.8% in control to 90.0%
2 days after incubation. The ammonia loss in the first 4 days was 12.3 and
28.2% of the applied N in the control and residue-amended Guthrie soil,
respectively (Caramona et al., 1990). The cumulative N losses were, howev-
er, similar (45 and 44%) under the two treatments. McInnes et al. (1986)
found that cumulative loss of NHþ4 –N was 7.6 and 16.6% of the N applied
from unamended and wheat-straw amended soil, respectively. Wheat straw
was found to have a urease activity of about 1830 mg urea kg�1h�1, a pH of
near 8, and a H ion buVering capacity of 53 mmol kg�1 (pH unit)�1. These
factors undoubtedly contributed to NH3 loss from upland soils. Singh and
Singh (1991), however, observed lower cumulative NH3 volatilization loss
from a saturated calcareous soil amended with rice straw than that from
unamended soil due to the lowering of soil pH by rice straw.
Gill et al. (1998a) measured more losses of N via NH3 volatilization from
flooded soils amended with wheat straw (11.6%) than from unamended soils
(7.1%) in 16 days. Application of nBTPT, a urease inhibitor, to the soils
amended with wheat straw reduced losses of NH3, although much less than
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 307
in the soil not amended with organic materials. These studies showed that
soils amended with crop residues would require two to four times more
nBTPT than the soils not amended with crop residues for eVectively reduc-
ing NH3 volatilization from flooded soils. Caramona et al. (1990) has also
drawn similar conclusions.
Residue left on the surface under no-till agriculture may also aVect NH3
volatilization. McGarity and Hoult (1971) found that plant material on the
soil surface influenced NH3 volatilization and ascribed this to urease asso-
ciated with the ureolytic phylloplane and litter microorganisms. Bacon et al.
(1986) reported that stubble management involving cultivation lost 7–8 kg
N ha�1, while zero cultivation treatments lost an average of 15 kg N ha�1.
They further reported that partial burial of urea reduced ammonia volatili-
zation from 36 kg under broadcast onto the surface of stubble retention
plots to 7 kg N ha�1. Retaining the stubble resulted in higher soil water
content increasing urea hydrolysis, leading to greater change in pH and
ammonium concentration. Additionally, some urea prills are retained within
the stubble above the soil surface. Under favorable conditions, urease activ-
ity associated with residue surfaces would enable urea hydrolysis in prills
held above the soil. Ash of crop residues at the soil surface also increased
ammonia volatilization due to its high pH (Bacon et al., 1986).
b. Leaching and Denitrification. Nitrogen immobilization by high C:N
ratio residues represents a potential temporary sink to reduce N loss from
leaching (Savant and De Datta, 1982). Immobilization of soil N within
surface residues may have a positive influence on subsequent crop growth
in that N remains near the root zone. However, leaching and denitrification
losses of N with in the soil profile may increase where surface-placed residues
result in increased water infiltration and reduced evaporation rates.
When residues are incorporated, depending on the placement and type, or
soil texture and water content, the potential for denitrification can be
increased dramatically (Aulakh et al., 1992). Generally, in lowland soils,
the rate of NO3 formation rather than available C limits denitrification.
Bacon et al. (1989) observed that incorporation of rice stubble in wheat
increased apparent denitrification of fertilizer N from an average of 34 to
53 kg N ha�1. The N loss occurred over several months, suggesting that
denitrification was maintained by continuous release of metabolizable car-
bohydrates from the decomposing rice stubble. Nugroho and Kuwatsuke
(1992b) found that under upland conditions (60% WHC), denitrification
hardly occurred when the level of NO3–N in soil was <5.5 mg g�1 soil.
The rate of denitrification substantially increased with the increase in the
level of NO3-N in the rice straw-amended soil, while in the soil without rice
straw, it only slightly increased with the increase in the level of NO3–N. The
maximum rate of denitrification was as high as 6.5 mg N2O–N g�1 day�1 in
308 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
the rice straw-amended soil. In a laboratory incubation study, Patrick and
Gotoh (1974) recorded reductions in fertilizer N losses by 30–40 mg kg�1
from the soil amended with rice straw. In pot and microplot studies, Xu
(1987) observed that application of rice straw with inorganic N enhanced
immobilization and reduced N losses via denitrification. Denitrification
losses from soil can be influenced by residue N content. Aulakh et al.
(1991) observed that denitrification losses from the soil at 90% water-filled
pore space were 87 to 127% of initial soil NO �3 and increased further with
increasing residue N content.
In a 2-year field study in subtropical Australia, Cogle et al. (1987) ob-
served that after 15 months, only 44% of applied 15N urea was recovered
from wheat residue incorporation treatment, compared to 55% from surface
retained treatment. The greater losses in incorporated straw treatment were
possibly due to greater availability of carbon to the denitrifying population
compared with treatment where wheat straw was retained on the soil
surface.
B. PHOSPHORUS
Phosphorus mineralization from crop residues is determined by the rate
of residue decomposition and microbial immobilization (Stevenson, 1986).
The activity of enzymes (phosphatases) that mineralize P is influenced by the
same factors that aVect microbial activity. Phosphorus content of the added
residue is perhaps the most important factor in regulating the mineralization
of P in crop residues. In general, net immobilization of P occurs following
addition of crop residues with less than 0.2 to 0.3% P, while net mineraliza-
tion occurs with higher P contents (Stevenson, 1986). During early stages of
residue decomposition, net immobilization of P can conserve a substantial
amount of P in slowly available organic forms. Cycling of P in soil is not
easily measured, since mineralized P may be removed from the soil solution
via adsorption to colloidal surfaces or precipitation as Ca, Fe, or Al phos-
phates or immobilized into organic P (Stevenson, 1986). Availability of P to
plants in crop residue-amended soils is, therefore, a function of organic
matter turnover, concentration of inorganic P in soil solution, and P
requirements of microorganisms.
Black and Reitz (1972) and Qiu and Ding (1986) reported that application
of wheat straw decreased the NaHCO3-extractable P in all the soils used in
the study. In other studies, application of rice and wheat straw (with C:P
ratio >300) caused immobilization of P during the first 15 days and then
progressively increased the available P content in soil from the 30th day
onward (Mukherjee et al., 1995; Yadvinder-Singh et al., 1988). Addition
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 309
of crop residues to waterlogged soil, however, significantly increased the
Olsen-P content (Yadvinder-Singh et al., 1988). Mishra et al. (2001b)
reported that during the decomposition of rice straw, P content
increased from 0.10 to 0.195% with time. About 22.5 and 59.4% of the
total P present in rice straw was released within 5 and 23 weeks, respectively,
after its incorporation into the soil. McLaughlin et al. (1988) indicated that
crop residue P may not significantly contribute to the nutrition of the
subsequent crop but becomes incorporated into organic P forms. In that
study, only 5.4% of the legume residue (Medicago truncatula L.) P was
recovered by wheat plants, while 22 to 28% was recovered in microbial
biomass. The microbial biomass, therefore, controlled the rate of organic
P accumulation.
In a rice–wheat cropping system, Hundal and Thind (1993) reported that
incorporation of wheat straw (6 t ha�1) depressed labile P and dissolved
P but enhanced organic P content during the initial stages of plant growth.
In a rice-potato-groundnut rotation, application of crop residues increased
the available P content and reduced the depletion of P reserve of soil
(Chatterjee and Mondal, 1996).
In a typic xerofluvant soil, application of barley straw and other organic
materials decreased the P sorption of the soil (Berton and Pratt, 1997). Ohno
and Erich (1997) reported that management systems that return crop resi-
dues back into the soil may increase the availability of P by decreasing the
adsorption of P on the soil surface in an acid soil. The release of aluminum
into the soil increased linearly with increasing rates of crop residues. On the
other hand, P adsorption increased with addition of rice straw in several soils
during the first week of incubation under flooded conditions (Phongpan,
1989). Willet and Higgins (1978) also observed increase in P sorptivity of two
rice soils amended with rice straw under flooded conditions. The increase in
P sorptivity was due to a rise in the levels of oxalate Fe under waterlogged
conditions and was dependent on the free iron oxides content of the soils. In
a long-term study (1979–1991), soils amended with crop residues exhibited
more P adsorption and a greater P adsorption maxima than crop residues
that were removed or burned (Table VI). However, the value of the aYnity
coeYcient, i.e., the bonding strength with which P is adsorbed onto the soil
surface, was the least for the residue incorporation and largest for the residue
removal. Similarly, the Frendulich adsorption isotherm showed the largest
amount adsorbed P but the slowest rate of P adsorption when crop residues
were incorporated.
Organic matter in the surface of no-tillage soils has been shown to
influence P distribution and the availability of P in cropped soils. Higher
P availability in the upper layers in notillage soil was attributed to the
absence of mixing of added fertilizer P, increased quantities of organic P,
Table VI
Langmuir and Freundilich P Adsorption Factors for DiVerent Crop Residue
Management Practices (Average of 6.0 and 8.0 t ha�1 of Wheat and Rice Straw Applied
for 11 Years, Respectively)
Crop residue
management
practice
Langmur adsorption Freundlich adsorption
Adsorption
maxima
(mg g�1)
AYnity
coeYcient,
(mg mL�1)
Extent of
adsorption
(mg g�1)
Rate of
adsorption,
(mg mL�1)
Burned 58.8 3.82 13.7 0.65
Removed 66.7 5.00 13.7 0.74
Incorporated 71.4 3.00 32.7 0.29
From Beri et al. (1995).
310 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
and possibly shielding P adsorption sites on soil colloids (Schomberg et al.,
1994a). Additionally, surface application and reduced mixing of P fertilizer
in no-tillage systems may reduce P fixation, thus allowing the accumulation
of unreacted phosphate under those conditions.
Residue management plays an important role in determining distribution
and availability of P in cropped soils. Microbial activity, climate factors, and
soil chemical status all influence the cycling of P in soils. Future research on
residue influences on P availability to plants should consider changes in
organic P, microbial P, and inorganic P transformations in soil. Continued
research on interactions between these pools should help improve the
eYcient utilization of P in cropping systems.
Phosphorus is a costly plant nutrient, since both rock phosphate and
S sources are scarce in developing countries such as India. Because of the
low grade of rock phosphate deposits, about 260 million t in India, it is not
recommended for soils with pH > 7.0. Narayanasamy and Biswas (1998)
reported that application of organic matter along with rock phosphate
increased the P eYciency. The suggested reasons were (1) formation of
plant-assimilable phosphorus-humic compounds, (2) anion replacement of
P ion by humate ion, and (3) coating of sesquoxide particles by humus,
which reduces P fixation. Sharma et al. (2001) reported that Mussoorie rock
phosphate (MRP) and diammonium phosphate (DAP) proved equally
eYcient in increasing grain yield and P uptake of rice when residues of the
preceding wheat were incorporated before rice transplanting or rice residue
was incorporated before sowing of the preceding wheat (Table VII). Without
residue incorporation, MRP (8.1% total P, 12% as citrate soluble) had no
significant eVect on grain yield and P uptake of rice. Similarly, MRP and
DAP proved equally eYcient in increasing wheat yield on residue-amended
plots. Available P in soil did not diVer under no P control and MRP when
Table VII
EVect of Crop Residue Management and Phosphorus Source on Crop Yields in Rice–Wheat
Rotation in India
Residue management Rice yield Wheat yield
Rice Wheat 1993 1994 1995 1993–94 1994–95 1995–96
Removed Removed 4.6 4.3 4.0 4.9 4.7 4.4
Incorporated Removed 4.9 4.5 4.5 4.8 5.0 4.3
Removed Incorporated — 4.8 4.5 4.9 4.8 4.9
Incorporated Incorporated — 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.8
LSD ( p ¼ 0.05) ns 0.31 0.18 ns ns ns
P source
Control Control 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.8 4.6 4.3
DAP DAP 4.9 4.8 4.4 4.8 4.8 4.7
MRP MRP 4.9 4.8 4.5 4.8 4.8 4.7
LSD ( p ¼ 0.05) 0.38 0.19 0.15 ns 0.18 0.33
DAP, diammonium phosphate; MRP, mussoorie rock phosphate.
From Sharma et al. (2001).
Table VIII
EVect of Crop Residue Management and Phosphorus Source on Olsen-P in Rice–Wheat
Rotation in India
Straw treatment
P source (kg ha�1)
Control DAP MRP
Both straws removed 14.8 19.6 15.6
Wheat straw incorporated 16.4 18.0 18.2
Rice straw incorporated 18.6 22.0 21.4
Both straws incorporated 19.2 23.6 27.6
LSD. ( p ¼ 0.05) Residue management � P source ¼ 5.95
DAP, diammonium phosphate; MRP, mussoorie rock phosphate.
From Sharma et al. (2001).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 311
residues were removed, but the incorporation of crop residues resulted in
similar levels of available P in soil under DAP and MRP. The eVect was
more pronounced when both the residues were incorporated as compared to
incorporation of rice or wheat straw alone (Table VIII).
Biswas and Narayanasamy (2002) evaluated composts prepared by mix-
ing rice straw with diVerent sources of rock phosphates collected from within
India. Cow dung slurry and Trichoderma viridii, a cellulytic fungus, were
inoculated to hasten the composting process. A phosphorus-solubilizing
microorganism (Aspergillus awamori) was also introduced 1 month after
312 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
the start of composting. The study showed that composting enhanced the
mobilization of P from rock phosphate as evidenced through increases in
water-soluble, citrate-soluble, and organic P fractions. Verma and Mathur
(1990) found that incorporation of rice straw along with cellulytic micro-
organisms and rock phosphate at 15 days before wheat sowing resulted in a
significant increase in wheat yield over recommended fertilizer management
practices. Tian and Kolawole (1998) reported that application of diVerent
crop residues increased the P uptake by Crotolaria ochsolenca from rock
phosphate. For eYcient use of P from rock phosphate in the low-fertility
soils, it is suggested to apply plant residues with high polyphenol and low
lignin contents.
C. POTASSIUM
Crop residues contain large quantities of potassium, and their recycling
can markedly increase K availability in soils (Chatterjee and Mondal, 1996;
Ning and Hu, 1990; Patil et al., 1993; Sarkar et al., 1989). Recycling of crop
residues can improve crop yields at low rates of K application and decrease
the crop response to the K applications. The role of crop residue recycling in
K balance in the rice–wheat cropping system has been dealt with in detail by
Bijay-Singh et al. (2003).
Yadvinder-Singh et al. (2004b) reported that release of K from rice straw
occurred at a fast rate, and within 10 days after incorporation, available soil
K contents increased from 50 mg K kg�1 in the untreated control to 66 mg
K kg�1 in straw-amended treatments. Tian et al. (1992) reported that most
of K in the rice residue was released in less than 41 days. The amount of
K released from organic materials in the first month was highly correlated
with the water-soluble K (Patil et al., 1993; Sarkar et al., 1989). Potassium is
not bound in any organic compound in the plant material, and thus its
release does not involve microorganisms.
Mishra et al. (2001b) reported that during the decomposition of rice straw,
K contents decreased from 1.30 to 0.28%. About 79% of the total K present
in rice straw was released within 5 weeks after its incorporation into the soil,
and 95.3% of K from straw was mineralized by the end of 23 weeks.
D. SULFUR
Sulfur is a critical nutrient for crop growth, and its deficiency is accen-
tuated in soils of the tropics by intensive agricultural practices, less use of
organic manures, removal of crop residues, and leaching of SO4 by heavy
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 313
rains. It is generally accepted that plants assimilate S almost entirely in the
form of SO4, which is produced by the mineralization of organic S. Unlike
phosphates, sulphates are easily leached. Incorporating crop residues into
the soil is one way of reducing S losses by leaching.
Mineralization of S in soils is mediated by biological activity. Very limited
information is available on S mineralization rates and potentials of wetland
soils amended with crop residues. In an incubation study, application of
wheat and barley straw to two soils (pH > 7.0) increased the S concentration
in equilibrium solution, suggesting that the addition of crop residues to soil
would increase available S (Choi and Rossi, 1978). Organic materials with
high C:S ratios such as wheat straw and rice husk caused considerable
immobilization of S, particularly during the early stages of decomposition
(Somani and Saxena, 1975). Addition of inorganic S fertilizers may,
therefore, be necessary. Islam and Dick (1998b) observed that addition of
wheat straw with a low C:S ratio (100:1) had a significantly higher accumu-
lation of SO4–S than the control or the higher C:S ratio (400:1) wheat
straw treatment. The cumulative amount of C mineralized was linearly
related to S mineralization. Islam and Dick (1998a) reported that the
S mineralization from crop residues followed first-order kinetics and that
the amount of SO4 in flooded soils amended with crop residues would
depend on the soil type, the nature of the crop residues, and the time of
decomposition. Crop residue management is a major determinant of long-
term S fertilizer requirements. Singh and Sharma (2000) observed a signifi-
cant increase in the availability of S in soil with the incorporation of crop
residues. The burning of straw or straw removal from rice paddies increases
the demand of the cropping system and will lead to increases in
S requirements in long term. Whitbread et al. (1999) reported an improve-
ment in the S balance with the incorporation of rice straw over removal.
Long-term studies are needed to enable measurement of the eVects of
recycling crop residues and the impact of environmental inputs on
S dynamics in the soil–plant system.
E. MICRONUTRIENTS
A ton each of rice and wheat removes 96, 777, 745, 42, 55, and 4 g ha�1 of
Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, B, and Mo, respectively. The total crop residue production
in India stands at 105 million tons, and based on micronutrient contents of
the residues, the micronutrient potential associated with crop residues would
be about 35.4 thousand tons (Prasad, 1999). About 50 to 80% of Zn, Cu,
and Mn taken up by rice and wheat crops can be recycled through residue
incorporation (Prasad and Sinha, 1995b). Therefore, recycling of crop
residues can help improve the availability of micronutrients in soil.
314 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
1. Iron and Manganese
The application of crop residues to flooded soils leads to a reduced redox
potential (Eh) and, as a consequence, increases the Fe and Mn concentra-
tions in the soil solution. Katyal (1977) observed that not only did the
maximum concentrations of Fe and Mn occur earlier but also their concen-
trations were significantly higher in flooded soils amended with rice straw
compared to control. Yodkeaw and De Datta (1989) also noted that appli-
cation of rice straw increased Fe2þ and Mn2þ concentrations in soil solution,
resulting in increased uptake of Fe and Mn by rice crop. Under controlled
Eh and pH conditions, Atta et al. (1996) observed that at an Eh value of
�330 mV, soil suspension contained approximately double the amount of
water-soluble plus exchangeable Fe as compared with at Eh values of �150
to þ300 mV. Addition of wheat straw to soil suspension decreased the
exchangeable Fe fraction at pH 8.0, while it increased the same fraction at
both pH 6.0 and 7.0. Exchangeable and water-soluble Mn fractions were
reduced due to application of wheat straw at pH 8.0, while the easily
decomposable fraction increased at pH 7.0 and 8.0 and decreased at pH
6.0. In a greenhouse experiment, Sharma et al. (1989) measured significantly
higher leaching losses of Mn2þ and Fe2þ with increasing rates of rice straw
and percolation rate. As much as 111 kg Mn ha�1 and 110 kg Fe ha�1 were
lost through leaching in one cropping season.
2. Zinc
Kang (1988) observed that the availability of Zn in diVerent pools (water-
soluble, exchangeable, weakly and tightly complexed to organic matter) was
reduced by straw application at soil pH of 8.0. Several other workers (Yoon
et al., 1975; Dikshit et al., 1976; Raj and Gupta, 1986; Nagarajah et al.,
1989) have also reported that application of rice or wheat straw decreased
the Zn concentration in both flooded and upland soils. As a consequence, Zn
uptake and dry matter production were reduced compared to that in un-
treated control. Saviozzi et al. (1997), however, observed no significant eVect
of wheat straw (applied at 2% by weight) on the content and distribution of
Zn and Cu in soils. Even so, rice straw application has been found to
increase the Zn content of rice plants, possibly through its amelioritic
eVect on soil pH and ESP.
In calcareous soils, application of crop residues decreased the capacity
factor due to organic acids converting solid-phase labile Zn to soluble Zn
complexes (Prasad and Sinha, 1995a). The diVusion coeYcient of Zn was
increased with the addition of crop residues due to the presence of chelat-
ing agents released during their decomposition and thereby increasing the
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 315
concentration of total diVusible Zn. The diVusion coeYcient and Zn uptake
by rice in calcareous soils are related linearly.
VI. EFFECT OF CROP RESIDUES ON SOIL PROPERTIES
A. SOIL FERTILITY
Crop residues are an important constituent in nutrient cycling. The straw
of most cereal crops contains about 35, 10, and 80% of the total N, P, and
K taken up by the crop (Barnard and Kristoferson, 1985). Apart from the
straw is plant root material, which in most crops adds a substantial amount
of C to the soils. Long-term straw incorporation improves the fertility and
productivity of soils (Ponnamperuma, 1984). Soil organic matter has been
identified by many workers as a key factor in maintaining soil fertility and
crop production. Its maintenance is an essential requirement for increasing
and maintaining productivity. In most of Asia, rice straw incorporated into
the soil is the main source of SOM in the rice-based cropping systems. Since
the maintenance of soil nutrient status is an important aspect of sustain-
ability, the management of crop residues and fertilizer to maintain soil
fertility is necessary.
1. Soil Organic Matter
In tropical soils, SOM plays a major role in soil productivity because
it represents the dominant reservoir and source of plant nutrients. It
also influences pH, cation exchange capacity, anion exchange capacity,
and soil structure. Its level in soil was used as a general indicator of soil
productivity. A major factor contributing to the level of SOM is annual
input of plant residues. Residue managment impacts on SOM and long-term
fertility are becoming more relevant in the context of soil quality in tropical
environments.
The prominent means of maintaining SOM in irrigated rice-based crop-
ping systems in tropical countries have historically been the incorporation of
green manures, animal waste, or crop residues. In recent years, though, the
significance of green manures and animal wastes has been dramatically
altered by the increased use of mineral N fertilizers and other economic
considerations. More recently, crop residues including roots have become a
more common source of organic material added to the soil in many countries
in the tropics, where the use of combine harvesters is increasing (Flinn and
Marciano, 1984). For a given climatic region and soil type, the rate of
316 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
addition of carbon inputs is an important factor determining the amount of
organic matter that can be maintained in the soil. The soils tend to reach
equilibrium provided farming techniques and crop residue management
practices stay the same over a long enough period. Under conditions of
warm temperatures and increased water availability, organic matter
accumulation from residues is reduced.
Soil organisms use residues as a source of energy and nutrients, thereby
releasing CO2, inorganic compounds, and recalcitrant molecules, which
contribute to the formation of soil humus. Decomposition of crop residues
releases about 55–70% of the C to the atmosphere as CO2, 5–15% is
incorporated into microbial biomass, and the remaining C (15–40%) is
partially stabilized in soil as new humus (Stott and Martin, 1989). Because
the amount of carbon in soils is large and changes rather slowly, the
implications of a particular management system on the soil carbon may be
apparent only after several years to decades. Numerous calculations have
been made of the amount of residues needed to maintain organic matter at a
particular level (Paustian et al., 1997).
There exist only limited studies on the long-term eVect of crop residue
management on organic matter and N content of soils under rice-based
cropping systems in tropical and sub-tropical countries (Tables IX and X).
In these studies, increases in organic matter content due to crop residue
recycling are relatively small compared to those reported from temperate
regions (Prasad and Power, 1991). Incorporation of both residues increased
organic C and total N compared to removal or burning of straw (Dhiman
et al., 2000). When only rice or wheat straw was incorporated, organic C
content did not diVer significantly from removal or burning of straw. Rice
straw was more eVective in increasing total N content of soil than wheat
straw. Raju and Reddy (2000) reported that in rice–rice rotation, incorpora-
tion of rice straw to supply 25% of the recommended N fertilizer dose for
rainy season crop for 6 years significantly increased organic C content from
Table IX
EVect of Straw Management on the Nutrient Status of Mahaas Clay and Grain Yield Averaged for
Five Cultivars after the 16th Cropa
Straw
treatment
Organic C
(%)
Total N
(%)
Olsen P
(mg kg�1)
Exchangeable
K (mg kg�1)
Grain yield
(t ha�1)
Removed 1.81b 0.167b 9a 10.5b 3.2b
Burned 1.94b 0.173ab 11a 12.5a 3.4b
Incorporated 2.17a 0.182a 12a 11.6ab 4.1a
aIn a column, figures followed by a common letter are not significantly diVerent.
From Ponnamperuma (1984).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 317
0.98% in straw removal treatment to 1.29%. Sharma (2001) reported that
organic C content increased from 0.56% in straw removal to 0.66% when
both the residues were incorporated for 2 years in rice–wheat rotation.
Burning and removal of crop residues were at par for their eVect on organic
C content.
Yadvinder-Singh et al. (2004b) reported that rice residue incorporation
increased organic carbon content of the sandy loam soil more significantly
than straw burning or removal after 7 years (Table X). Carbon sequestration
derived from changes in soil C content in the soil from rice residue applied at
7.1 t ha�1 annually for 7 years averaged 14.6%. In another long-term study,
Yadvinder-Singh et al. (2004a) reported that wheat straw incorporation in
rice increased organic C content from 0.40% in straw removal treatment to
0.53% in straw incorporation treatment after 12 years of experimentation on
a loamy sand soil. The values after 6 years were 0.38 and 0.49%, respectively,
suggesting smaller increases in organic C between 6 and 12 years than during
0–6 years. Carbon sequestration derived from changes in soil C content in
the soil from wheat straw incorporation for 12 years represented 10% of
the added carbon. The rate of increase in organic C with straw incorporation
is generally smaller in coarse-textured soils than in fine-textured soils.
For example, Verma and Bhagat (1992) and Dhiman et al. (2000) ob-
served marked increases in organic C in sandy clay loam soils with residue
incorporation after 4–5 years.
Naklang et al. (1999) observed no significant eVect of rice straw incor-
poration for 3 years on total and labile C content of a sandy soil. In a
rice-barley rotation under dryland conditions in northern India, Kushwaha
et al. (2000) observed a significant increase (28%) in soil organic carbon and
33% increase in total N with the incorporation of crop residues compared to
their removal after one annual cycle. It was suggested that for soil fertility
enhancement in dryland agroecosystems, postharvest retention of crop resi-
dues (20–40% aboveground biomass) of previous crop and its incorporation
in soil through minimum tillage in the succeeding crop should be followed.
Application of rice straw at 10 t ha�1 to an upland sandy soil caused a net
increase in soil C by 0.31 t ha�1 over no rice straw treatment (Ono, 1989).
The increase in C represented 8% of the C applied in rice straw. At higher
rates of straw addition, the net increase in soil C was increased but the
percent C increase did not change significantly. The soil C buildup in the soil
was significantly positively correlated with %N and negatively correlated
with C:N ratio.
Using data from a 24-year long-term experiment at IRRI, Los Banos,
Alberto et al. (1996) showed that straw incorporation improved organic
C, total N, available P, and exchangeable K above that of the burned
straw and no straw treatments. There was an average increase of 0.4 t ha�1
in rice yield with straw incorporation, while burning the straw resulted in
Table X
EVect of Crop Residue Management on Organic Carbon and Total N Content of Soil
Reference and country Type of crop residue and soil
Duration
of study
(years)
Residue
management
Organic
C (%)
Total
N(%)
Beri et al. (1995), India Rice straw in wheat and wheat
straw in rice; sandy loam
10 Removed 0.38 0.051
Burned 0.43 0.055
Incorporated 0.47 0.056
Sharma et al. (1987), India Rice straw in wheat and wheat
straw in rice, silty clay loam
6 Removed 1.15 0.144
Incorporated 1.31 0.159
IRRI (1986), Philippines Rice straw in rice–rice rotation;
clayey
12 Removed 1.67 0.173
Burned 1.74 0.179
Incorporated 1.90 0.191
Liu and Shen (1992), China Milk vetch green manure or
milk vetch þ rice straw in
rice–rice rotation
9 Removed 1.91 0.176
Green manure 2.06 0.190
Green manure
þ rice straw
2.21 0.194
Zia et al. (1992), Pakistan Rice straw in rice in rice–wheat
rotation; loam
3 Removed 0.53 —
Incorporated 0.63 —
Yadvinder-Singh et al.
(2004a), India
Wheat straw, green manure and
wheat straw þ green manure
in rice in rice–wheat rotation;
loamy sand
12 Straw removed 0.41 —
Straw incorporated 0.53 —
Wheat straw þgreen manure
0.59 —
318Y
AD
VIN
DE
R-S
ING
HET
AL
.
Dhiman et al. (2000), India Rice straw in wheat and wheat
straw in rice in rice–wheat
rotation; clay loam
3 Removed 0.51 0.062
Burned 0.51 0.063
Incorporated 0.86 0.084
Kumar et al. (2000), India Mustard straw in rice in rice–
mustard rotation, acidic
sandy clay loam
Removed 0.36 —
Incorporated 0.61 —
Prasad et al. (1999), India Wheat straw in rice in rice–
wheat rotation; sandy clay
loam
2 Removed 0.53 —
Incorporated 0.61 —
Rice straw in wheat in rice–
wheat rotation; sandy clay
loam
2 Removed 0.68 —
Incorporated 0.84 —
Verma and Bhagat (1992),
India
Rice straw in wheat in rice–
wheat rotation; silty clay
loam
5 Removed 1.09 —
Incorporated 1.24 —
Yadvinder-Singh et al.
(2004a), India
Rice straw in wheat in rice–
wheat rotation; sandy loam
7 Removed 0.38 —
Burned 0.39 —
Incorporated 0.50 —
Ponnamperuma (1984),
Philippines
Rice straw in rice in rice–rice
rotation; clayey
19 crops Removed — 0.181
Burned — 0.183
Incorporated — 0.202
CR
OP
RE
SID
UE
MA
NA
GE
ME
NT
319
320 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
negligible improvements. This reported increase occurred over a 14-year
period and highlights the time frame over which SOM increases occur.
A small increase in SOM associated with improved residue management
demonstrates how diYcult it is to improve SOM levels and, consequently,
nutrient levels in coarse-textured soils of the tropics. Incorporation of rice
straw at 5 t ha�1 year�1 for 12 years showed only a small increase in organic
C and total N content of soil with 2% initial organic C level (IRRI, 1986).
Straw removal or burning caused a decline in organic matter content during
the first 3 years of the study, while the straw incorporation maintained the
original level.
Field experiments on a rice–wheat cropping system in India showed that
incorporation of crop residues as compared to burning or removal increased
organic carbon and total N contents (Table X). Adiningsih (1984) reported
that incorporation of rice straw into the soil for 4 years increased the soil
organic matter content from 2.4 to 3.9% and total N content from 0.25 to
0.33% over straw removal in Indonesia. In China, Liu and Weng (1991)
found that returning rice straw to rice fields for 2 years usually increased soil
organic matter content by 0.03 to 0.05%. From a long-term field experiment
in Japan, Gotoh et al. (1984) estimated that 13 to 25% of the organic matter
returned to soil through rice straw was incorporated into the soil organic
matter in a slowly permeable grey lowland soil. In a 3-year study on a barley-
early rice-late rice cropping sequence in China, He and Liu (1992) reported
that addition of organic materials (green manure, crop residues, and FYM)
resulted in a mean increase (average of six experiments) of 0.053% organic
C compared to loss of 0.04% under inorganic fertilizer treatment. They
calculated that supply of 3.2 to 4.6 t ha�1 (mean of 3.8 t ha�1) of crop
residues ha�1 year�1 would be needed to maintain the soil health and to
improve productivity.
In a long-term study on a rice–wheat cropping system in northwestern
India, the incorporation of crop residues along with green manure in rice
increased soil organic carbon and total N contents as compared to straw
removal, but the increase was almost similar to that when crop residues were
applied alone. These data suggested little eVect of green manure on soil
organic matter content in semi-arid climates, particularly in coarse-textured
soils (Table IX). In a long-term study (1981–1990) in China, Liu and
Shen (1992) studied the eVect of milk vetch green manure in early rice
and milk vetch plus rice straw in late rice in a rice–rice cropping system.
The increases in organic matter and total N concentrations in soil were in
the decreasing order: green manure plus rice straw, green manure, and
inorganic fertilizers. Further, mixed application of green manure and crop
residues improved the quality of soil organic matter (Table IX). Vityakon
et al. (2000) reported that application of rice straw at 10 t ha�1 increased
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 321
organic C content of upland soil by 0.31 t ha�1 year�1 over no straw in loam
soil in Thailand.
Naklang et al. (1999) used the two indices to calculate a carbon manage-
ment index (CMI). They measured two fractions of organic carbon in soil.
The more labile fraction (CL) was measured by oxidation with 333 mM
KMnO4, and the nonlabile C (CNL) plus the C not oxidized by 333 mM
KMnO4, (i.e., CT-CL). The total C (CT) was measured by combustion. On
the basis of changes in CT between a reference site and the cropped site, a
carbon pool index (CPI) was calculated:
CPI ¼ CTcropped=CTreference ð6Þ
On the basis of changes in the proportion of CL in the soil (labiality ¼ L ¼CL/CNL), a labile index (4) was determined.
CMI ¼ CPI � LI � 100 ð7Þ
Incorporation of leaf litters increased the CMI from 9 in 1992 (initial) to
about 20 after 3 years in 1996 and CMI in no-litter treatment increased to 13.
Straw incorporation did not significantly aVect the CT (4.44 versus 4.11 mg
g�1) and CL (0.78 versus 0.79) compared to straw removal treatments. The
measurement of CL is a more sensitive indicator of SOM dynamics. Total
C measurement is still required to estimate bulk soil C change; however, CL
more accurately and quickly detects the impact of management on soil
C. Calculation of the CMI takes into account the change in CT pool size
and its lability and gives a more definitive picture of soil C dynamics than
when only a single parameter is used.
The studies on soil organic matter dynamics suggest that soil texture,
C inputs, and climatic conditions are the primary factors controlling stabili-
zation of soil C. Simulation models allow us to account for such interacting
factors and thus can be profitably used to understand the dynamics of soil
organic matter in crop residue-amended soils on a long-term basis. Most of
these models predictions have not been tested using observed data, and there
is a need to revalidate these models for rice-based cropping systems. There is
no single fixed quantity of SOM that can be considered as optimal for all
soils. All other factors held constant, an increase of 1% in SOM content
will have greater eVects for a sandy soil than for a clay-loam soil on the
overall productivity level. Benefits of increased SOM will also depend on
land use. For example, improved physical properties in clay soils might be
more useful for upland crops than lowland rice, as the common practice of
puddling rice soils is intended to destroy soil structure.
Soil organic matter levels tend to be stable or increase under irrigated
rice double cropping (Cheng, 1984; Nambiar, 1994; Witt et al., 2000).
Organic matter content is generally lower in rice-upland crop rotations
322 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
such as rice–wheat or rice-maize (Cheng, 1984; Nambiar, 1994; Witt et al.,
2000). The reduced soil C sequestration in the rice-upland rotation re-
sulted primarily from an increased amount of microbially mediated
C mineralization compared to the C mineralization rate in the rice–rice
system (Witt et al., 2000). Carbon sequestration with continuous rice crop-
ping would also be favored by the accumulation of phenolic end products
that appears to occur when crop residues decompose under anoxic condi-
tions in lowland rice systems (Olk et al., 1996). When crop residues are not
regularly incorporated in the lowland-upland crop rotations, the amounts of
labile SOM can decrease to the point of reducing the continuous supply of
available N through mineralization–immobilization turnover (Stevenson and
Kelley, 1985), which could lead to lower grain yield. In the light textured soils,
nutrients and soluble C compounds may move down the profile, thus resulting
in very slow, or no, long-term increase in soil fertility when residues are added
(Naklang et al., 1999).
Management of crop residues might also carry longer term impacts on the
chemical nature of SOM. The eVects of crop management on SOM quantity
in lowland rice soils have received more attention than have their eVects on
SOM quality. Few or no studies have examined the eVects of agronomic
practices on the quantity or quality of SOM and nutrient supply in intensive
continuous rice or rice–wheat rotations.
The quantity of SOM is not the sole factor that should be considered
when devising management practices to optimize the agronomic benefits of
SOM. A higher quantity of SOM does not automatically lead to a higher
quality of SOM. If most SOM-bound nutrients are in SOM fractions that
have low turnover rates, that is, high residence times, their roles in nutrient
supply will remain marginal. If the soil in question is a sandy soil, for
example, and if the crop obtains the bulk of its nutrients through decompo-
sition of the various SOM pools rather than through the exchange of
nutrients present on CEC complexes, the nutrient supply power of the soil
will remain low. Ultimately, it remains the quality rather than the quantity
of SOM that will lead to improved soil quality, and hence a more sustainable
cropping system, in particular for those agrosystems that are prone to land
degradation.
It remains a diYcult task to identify and quantify the intrinsic quality of
an SOM pool in terms of nutrient supply power, microbial activity, or
physical or chemical indices. Labile SOM pools are key suppliers of nutri-
ents to the crop, whereas other SOM pools are more recalcitrant in nature
and will provide fewer nutrients, but their chemical and physical properties
provide stability to the soil. The relative sizes of the labile versus more
recalcitrant pools that make up total SOM might have pronounced eVects
on the indigenous nutrient supply and perhaps even yield (Biederbeck et al.,
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 323
1984; McGill et al., 1986), illustrating the complexities of managing SOM
quality. The chemical nature of humic acid fractions changed with an
increasing number of annual irrigated rice crops (Olk et al., 1996). The
increasingly phenolic nature of the humic acid was speculated to be a
contributing factor to an apparent decline in soil N supply and grain yield
in continuously cropped lowland rice soils, as phenols are known to stabilize
nitrogenous compounds under controlled conditions (Haider et al., 1965).
The eVect of rotating upland crops with rice on SOM quality indicated that
the phelonic nature of labile SOM extracted from rice–wheat soils is more
similar to that of labile SOM from lowland rice–rice soils than that from
upland rice soils (Olk et al., 2000). Again, the agronomic significance of this
finding is not clear.
Bird et al. (2002) examined the five soil organic matter fractions from soil
samples obtained after 4 to 6 years of rice residue management treatments
using 15N-labeled urea. After 4 years of straw management treatments, soil
incorporation of straw increased mobile humic acid (MHA) and light
fraction (LF) carbon and N compared with burned straw. Immobilization
of fertilizer N peaked in all soil organic matter fractions after one growing
season (120 days) and was greater in the MHA over the 2-year study.
Nitrogen fertilizer sequestration was in MHA and LF and was greatest
with straw incorporation compared with straw burned. Turnover of immo-
bilized 15N fertilizer was fastest in the labile MHA and MFA (mobile fulvic
acid) fractions (7–9 years half-life) compared with a half-life of the moder-
ately resistant MAHA (metal-associated humic acid) fraction (53 years) and
most stable humic (HUM) fraction (153 years). The MHA and LF fractions
represented the primary active sink and source of sequestered N, aVecting
both short- and long-term soil fertility. A study by Devevre and Howarth
(2000) suggested that it is not primarily the accumulation of degradation
byproducts that may sequester N in SOM, as suggested by Olk et al. (1996).
The larger and sustained microbial biomass found under flooded compared
to aerobic conditions may act to immobilize more N and make it less
available for plant uptake.
The composition and dynamics of SOM are generally the same in tem-
perate and tropical soils, except that turnover rates in tropical soils usually
are higher than in colder climates. Therefore, many results from temperate
soils can be used to explain SOM dynamics and control in tropical soils. The
main transformations occurring during residue decomposition and humifi-
cation are the loss of polysaccharides and phenolic moieties, modification of
lignin structures, and enrichment in recalcitrant, non-lignin aromatic struc-
tures (Zech et al., 1997). The rates of these transformations are controlled
primarily by climatic factors and only to a lesser extent by chemical factors
such as pH, C:N ratio, or litter quality. Soil organic matter stabilization by
324 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
interaction with minerals probably is more important in tropical than
temperate soils because of the more favorable climatic conditions for decom-
position of organic matter. The protective eVect of minerals is most
pronounced for labile constituents such as polysaccharides or proteins.
Studies on the contribution of labile fraction to SOM dynamics in tropical
ecosystems are very scarce.
Crop residue management can aVect N immobilization and stabilization
processes important to eYcient utilization of N from fertilizers, crop resi-
dues, and soil organic matter. Bird et al. (2002) reported that a consistently
larger soil microbial biomass N and C pool was observed when straw was
incorporated than when it was burned. Because soil microbial biomass is a
prime source of available N for the crop, the incorporation of straw led to an
increase in the crop-available soil N. Although total soil N content had not
changed after 5 years of straw incorporation or burning, a significant in-
crease had taken place in the more labile soil N pools (humic substances).
The more labile soil N pools remain key sources of readily available N for
crop utilization.
2. Total N
About 70% of the rice lands in south and south-east Asia contain
<0.2% N and are considered N deficient (Ponnamperuma, 1984). Incorpora-
tion of crop residues enhances the N content of several wetland rice
fields (Tables IX and X). Within 3 years of incorporating the rice straw at
6–7 t ha�1, total N content in soil increased by 0.021% over the straw
removal treatment. At IRRI, in situ incorporating the straw twice a year
caused an increase of 48 kg N ha�1 per season, averaged for two experiments
lasting 7 years (Ponnamperuma, 1984). In another study with three soils over
a 5-year period, the increase due to straw incorporation was computed to be
40 kg N ha�1 per season, about 10 kg N ha�1 per season more than the straw
N content. The extra N probably came from N fixation stimulated by straw
acting as an energy source for heterotrophs and as a CO2 supplement to
surface phototrophs (Ponnamperuma, 1984).
3. Available P and K
A number of studies (Alberto et al., 1996; Gangaiah et al., 1999;
Ponnamperuma, 1984; Prasad et al., 1999; Sharma, 2001; Singh and Sharma,
2000) (Tables IX and XI) showed a slight or no increase in the available P in
the soil and P uptake of rice and wheat in soils amended with rice or wheat
straw. In an 11-year field experiment on a loamy sand in Punjab (India),
incorporation of residues of both crops in rice–wheat rotation increased the
Table XI
EVect of Crop Residue Management on the Available P, K, and S Contents in Soil
Reference
and country
Type of crop
residue and soil
Duration
of study
(years)
Residue
management
Available nutrients
(mg kg�1)
Olsen-P NH4OAc-K S
Beri et al.
(1995),
India
Rice straw in
wheat and
wheat straw on
rice, sandy loam
11 Removed 17 45 55
Burned 14 58 34
Incorporated 21 52 61
Sharma et al.
(2001),
India
Wheat straw in
rice, sandy clay
loam
2 Removed 14.0b 151c —
Burned 14.5b 169ab —
Incorporated 16.1a 175a —
Verma and
Bhagat
(1992),
India
Rice straw in
wheat, sandy
clay loam
5 Removed 12.6b 49.7b —
Incorporated 15.4a 73.0a —
Prasad et al.
(1999),
India
Rice straw in
wheat, sandy
clay loam
2 Removed 63 —
Incorporated 70 —
Wheat straw in
rice, sandy clay
loam
2 Removed 113 —
Incorporate 120 —
Yadvinder-
Singh et al.
(2004a),
India
Wheat straw in
rice, loamy
sand
12 Removed 6.4b 32b
Incorporated 6.2b 38a
Wheat straw
þ GM
7.4a 40a
Yadvinder-
Singh et al.
(2004a),
India
Rice straw in
wheat, sandy
loam
7 Removed — 35c —
Burned — 41b —
Incorporated — 45a —
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 325
total and available P and K contents in soil over removal of residues
(Table XII). Similarly, in a long-term study in Bihar (India), Misra et al.
(1996) observed increases in availability of P and K in soil with the incor-
poration of crop residues in rice–wheat rotation. Application of wheat straw
continuously for 12 years in a loamy sand soil caused only a small increase in
available K while taking into consideration the total amount of total
K recycled through the straw (Yadvinder-Singh et al., 2003a). In another
study on a sandy loam soil, incorporation of rice residue caused a smaller
but more significant increase in available K content in the soil than did the
residue removal treatments (Table XI). On average, rice residue added about
175 kg K ha�1 annually in treatments. Despite such large additions, the
increase in K availability in the soil was small. One possible reason for the
small increases observed in residue-amended plots may be the loss through
Table XII
EVect of Crop Residue Management on Soil Fertility of a Loamy Sand Soil over 11 Years of
Rice–Wheat Cropping System
Soil property
Crop residue management
Burned Removed Incorporated
Total P (mg kg�1) 390 420 612
Total K (%) 1.71 1.54 1.81
Olsen P (mg kg�1) 14.4 17.2 20.5
Available K (mg kg�1) 58 45 52
Available S (mg kg�1) 34 55 61
From Beri et al. (1995).
326 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
leaching of a significant proportion of residue K during rice cultivation on
highly permeable coarse-textured soils. Beaton et al. (1992) reported no
significant eVect of crop residues on the available K concentration in soil.
The K added through crop residues was possibly leached from the soil,
converted to unavailable forms, or taken up by the subsequent crops. Prasad
et al. (1999) reported an increase of 7 mg K kg�1 soil with straw incorpora-
tion compared to straw removal after 2 years of study in a sandy clay loam
soil. In a 6-year study by Raju and Reddy (2000) in rice–rice rotation,
application of rice straw to supply 25% of the recommended N fertilizer
(60 kg N ha�1) in rainy season rice caused a small increase in Olsen-P
compared to straw removal, but available K increased from 113 mg K kg�1
in straw removal to 143 mg kg�1 in straw-incorporated treatment.
The benefits of straw incorporation are reflected not only in the increase
in soil K but also in plant uptake (Beye, 1977; Ponnamperuma, 1984). In a
field experiment on rice-potato-mungbean rotation, Chatterjee and Mondal
(1996) observed that crop residues applied at a rate to supply 25% of the
recommended N requirement (75% supplied through fertilizer) increased
the available K in soil and lowered the depletion of non-exchangeable
K compared to the inorganic fertilizer alone treatment. Gill and Adiningsih
(1986) observed a marked response to K application in two crops of rice and
one soybean crop when crop residues were removed at harvest on Orthoxic
Troppudult soil high in Al and low in K. Recycling of crop residues dramat-
ically improved the yields at low rate of K application and decreased crop
response to applied K. Magbanua et al. (1988) reported that there was a
strong K depletion when residues of previous crops were removed. Rice
straw incorporation improved nutrient (P, K, S) balance over straw removal.
Whitbread et al. (1999) also reported that removal of rice stubble resulted in
negative K and S balances in rice.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 327
4. Available Micronutrients and Silicon
Incorporation of residues decreased the availability of Zn but had no
significant eVect on Cu and Mn availability in soil (Bijay-Singh et al., 1992).
In another study over a 5-year period on a silt loam soil in Himachal Pradesh
(India), incorporation of rice straw in wheat, however, caused a slight
increase in the availability of P, Mn, and Zn and a marked increase in the
availability of K (Verma and Bhagat, 1992). Likewise, incorporation of
crop residues on a long-term basis has been found to increase the DTPA
extractable Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn contents in soil (Meelu et al., 1994).
Rice straw contains large amounts of Si that on incorporation can in-
crease its availability in soils. According to Sumida and Ohyama (1991),
application of rice straw increased the Si content of rice plants, which helped
increase the lodging resistance in rice.
B. CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
1. Redox Potential and Electrical Conductivity
Incorporation of crop residues is unlikely to have a significant eVect on
the changes in Eh of aerobic soils due to fast O2 diVusion into soil, except in
large aggregates. Fermentation of crop residues in waterlogged soils results
in low Eh (Beye et al., 1978) and high pCO2, which leads to initial increase in
the concentrations of Fe2þ and Mn2þ in soil solution followed by precipita-
tion of carbonates. In rice straw-amended flooded soils, not only did the
peaks of CO2 occur earlier, but the concentration also increased as com-
pared to control (Katyal, 1977). Murty and Singh (1976) observed an
increase of 0.04 atm of pCO2 due to the addition of wheat straw to flooded
rice. Yoo et al. (1990) observed that surface application of rice straw sup-
pressed the formation of an oxidized layer and increased reducing condi-
tions. Rice straw also reduced O2 concentration followed by an increase in
the accumulation of CO2.
Straw incorporation hastened and intensified soil reduction and also
increased pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of acid soils (Beye et al.,
1978) and decreased pH and EC of alkaline soils (Yodkeaw and De Datta,
1989). Katyal (1977) noted the acceleration and intensification of Eh and pH
changes and the achievement of peak concentrations of water soluble Fe,
Mn, and CO2 in three soils amended with crop residues. Several researchers
(Murty and Singh, 1976; Wu, 1996) observed increases in EC of soil with the
application of crop residues under anaerobic conditions.
328 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
2. Soil pH
Crop residues can influence soil pH through accumulation of CO2 and
organic acids during their decomposition in the soils. The reduction in Eh of
flooded soils after the incorporation of crop residues may increase soil pH
due to consumption of protons during the reduction of Fe and Mn oxides.
A sharp decrease in soil pH of flooded soils due to application of rice or
wheat straw has been recorded by Wu (1996) and Murty and Singh (1976).
Under controlled Eh levels, Atta et al. (1996) observed a slight decrease in
pH of soil suspension during 5 days of incubation. A slight decrease in
soil pH with the application of wheat or rice straw was also reported by
Saviozzi et al. (1997), Gangaiah et al. (1999), and Kushwaha et al. (2000).
However, Verma and Bhagat (1992) noted no significant eVect of rice straw
management on pH of an acidic sandy clay loam soils after 5 years of
experimentation.
Seki et al. (1989) observed that successive applications of rice straw and
wheat straw decreased the pH of the surface layer in coarse-textured grey
lowland and fine-textured yellow soils with a sharp decline in the first year.
In a silty clay loam soil (pH 7.3) amended with rice straw, Sharma et al.
(1989) recorded lower pH values of soil solution between 2 and 6 weeks after
transplanting compared to those from untreated soil. Retention of crop
residues on the soil surface can result in a decline in soil pH to levels that
may adversely aVect crop production (Schomberg et al., 1994a). In long-
term field experiments (over 10 years), Beri et al. (1995) and Bellakki et al.
(1998), however, observed no significant eVect of incorporation of crop
residue on soil pH. In contrast, Yoo et al. (1990) recorded a significant
increase in the pH of floodwater with the application of rice straw.
The eVect of application of plant materials on soil pH depends on the
composition of plant material used (Yan et al., 1996). The mineralization of
N-rich compounds followed by nitrification produces protons, resulting in
the acidification of the soil. The influence of residues on soil pH appears to be
rather small, but the method of residue management may greatly influence
the soil reaction. The potential for pH changes with surface-managed residues
is greatest in response to application of fertilizers or high-N residues to the
surface and the absence of mixing soil amendments through the soil profile.
C. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Crop residues play an important role in improving soil physical charac-
teristics, but the degree of improvement depends on particle size distribu-
tion. Sandy soils with low SOM contents lack substantial structure and are
prone to severe erosion. Adding crop residues or manure will increase
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 329
microbial activity, which in some studies has led to the buildup of SOM and
formation of macro- and micro aggregates (Sparling et al., 1992; Angers
et al., 1993). Di Verences in aggregate stability also depend on the sources of
the organic materials, such as fungal hyphae versus microbial polysacchar-
ides (Tisdall, 1991). On the other end of the particle spectrum, heavy clay
soils are often characterized by poor structure and aeration, but they can be
improved through the addition of organic amendments. Therefore, the
positive e Vect of SOM on soil structure will be more pronounced for a
clay soil than for a silty soil.
In most climates, removal or burning of crop residues leads to deteriora-
tion of soil physical properties (Kladivko, 1994; Prasad and Power, 1991). In
rice, puddling of soil by cultivation in standing water could adversely a Vect
soil structure through destruction of aggregates and peds (Sharma and De
Datta, 1985) and leads to formation of a pan of low permeability immediately
below the cultivated layer, particularly on fine-textured soils. This hard pan
could be detrimental for the productivity of the upland crop (say wheat) after
rice (Moorman and Van Breeman, 1978; Sur et al., 1981). A recent review has,
however, shown that puddling may or may not be detrimental to the suc-
ceeding non-rice crops and soil (Connor et al., 2003). Recycling of crop
residues influences soil structure, crusting, bulk density, moisture retention,
and water infiltration rate and may help reduce adverse e Vects of hard pan
formation in rice-based cropping systems, which may play an important role
in the upland crop (such as wheat or maize) after rice than the rice crop.
1. Aggregation
The role of soil organic matter in aggregate stability is summarized in Fig. 5.
Straw incorporation helps the formation and stability of aggregates through
increase in microbial cells, and excrets microbial products and decomposition
products released during the death of the microorganisms (Lynch and Elliott,
1983). The soil organic matter in turn is protected within aggregates for
decomposition (Dalal and Bridge, 1996). The amount and chemical composi-
tion of organic residues, temperature, and moisture conditions are the major
factors determining aggregation in soil (Prasad and Power, 1991). Thus, easily
decomposable plant residues such as green manure and grain legume residues
provide transient and temporary aggregate stabilizing agents, while cereal crop
residues provide persistent aggregate stabilizing agents (Elliott and Lynch,
1984). Chaudhary and Ghildhyal (1969) obtained a close relation (r ¼ 0.76)
between organic C increased by organic materials addition and aggregate
stability of soil under wetland rice. Likewise, Elliott and Lynch (1984) found
that the eVect of straw on aggregation in a silt loam soil decreased with
increasing straw N content in the range of 0.25 to 1.09%.
Figure 5 A generalized summary of soil aggregates stabilization by various sources of
organic matter (Dalal and Bridge, 1996).
330 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Several researchers have reported an improvement in soil aggregation
after incorporation of crop residues into the soil under rice-based cropping
systems (Bhagat et al., 2003; Liu and Shen, 1992; Liu et al., 1990; Meelu
et al., 1994; Oh, 1984). In a 10-year study on a rice–rice cropping system on a
vertisol, application of rice straw incorporated to meet either 25 or 50% of
recommended fertilizer N requirement increased the water stable aggregates
(Table XIII). In a rice–wheat cropping system on a loamy sand soil, incor-
poration of wheat straw over a 5-year period in rice promoted formation of
soil aggregates, particularly 1–2 mm size, and mean weight diameter (Table
XIV). A mixed application of green manure and crop residues was more
eVective compared to their separate applications. Similarly, in a long-term
experiment (1981–1990) on rice–rice rotation in China, Liu and Shen (1992)
noted that application of crop residues promoted aggregation. The contents
of micro-aggregates (0.25–1.0 mm) were increased from 10.9% in inorganic
fertilizer treatment to 12.1% in milk vetch green manure and to 13.6% in
green manure plus rice straw treatment.
In a 4-year barley-early rice-late rice crop rotation in China, Rixon
et al. (1991) found that addition of 3 t ha�1 of crop residues in late rice did
not significantly aVect distribution and stability of aggregates and moisture
retention characteristics of a gleyed paddy soil. However, after 5 years of the
above study, a continuous improvement in soil structure, volume weight,
porosity, aggregation, and plasticity was observed (Zhu and Yao, 1996).
The eVect of crop residues on aggregation also depends on the aggrega-
tion potential of the soil. Datta et al. (1989) have shown that when clay
Table XIII
EVect of Rice Straw Application on Soil Physical Properties in Rice–Rice Cropping System over a
10-Year Period on a Clayey Soil
Treatment to
summer rice
Bulk
density
(Mg m�3)
HC
(cm h�1)a
Water
stable
aggregates
(%)
Porosity
(%)
Water
retention
(kg kg�1)
Maximum
water
retention
capacity
(kg kg�1)33 kPa 1.5 MPa
Inorganic
fertilizers
1.43 1.18 37.6 46 0.35 0.21 0.49
Rice straw to
meet 50% N
1.26 1.93 51.3 52 0.43 0.28 0.58
Rice straw to
meet 25% N
1.27 1.78 49.6 52 0.41 0.26 0.56
Green leaf
manure to
meet 50% N
1.29 1.80 50.1 50 0.42 0.26 0.57
aHC, hydraulic conductivity.
From Bellakki et al. (1998).
Table XIV
EVect of Green Manure and Crop Residues on Soil Aggregation and Bulk Density in a Rice–Wheat
Cropping System on a Loamy Sand Soil after 5 Years
Treatment
Water stable
aggregates (%) Mean
weight
diameter
(mm)
Bulk density
(Mg m�3)
>2
mm
1–2
mm
0.5–1
mm
0.1–0.5
mm 0–10 cm 10–20 cm
Residue removed 9.8 10.0 5.6 11.3 1.42 1.59 1.72
Residue incorporated 11.7 15.0 5.5 11.3 1.56 1.49 1.72
Green manure (GM) 11.1 15.5 6.1 12.0 1.58 1.51 1.71
Crop residue þ GM 17.1 11.1 6.9 9.1 1.68 1.48 1.68
From Meelu et al. (1994).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 331
content in soil was low, burying of straw had a more favorable eVect on the
stability of aggregates, especially of crumbs 3–5 mm in diameter, than in soil
with 27% clay content. Likewise, Verma and Singh (1974) observed that
wheat straw caused a marked influence on soil aggregation in four diVerent
soils varying in texture. Maximum aggregation occurred in the sandy loam,
with minimum aggregation in alkali soil. Application of rice straw to alkali
332 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
clayey soil significantly increased water stable aggregates >0.25 mm. Total
organic C also increased, which resulted in a marked increase of macropores
as well as the aggregate size in the 2.0–0.84 mm size fractions (El Samanoudy
et al., 1993). In a friable self-mulching clay of the vertisol group, 34 years of
either stubble burning or incorporation had, however, little eVect on soil
structure (Dexter et al., 1982). The nature of plant material also plays an
important role in the development of soil structure. For example, Dhoot
et al. (1974) recorded the highest percentage of water-stable aggregates in
pearl millet-amended soil followed by rice straw or wheat straw and sesbania
green manure.
2. Porosity
In a long-term field study in China, rice straw incorporation increased the
porosity and formation of large micro-aggregates and decreased the bulk
density of paddy soils (Li et al., 1986; Xu and Yao, 1988). Rice straw and
rape straw were more eVective in increasing porosity of soils than sesbania
green manure or pig manure (Li et al., 1986). Bellakki et al. (1998) and
Bhagat et al. (2003) noted a significant increase in the porosity of fine-
textured soils after the application of rice straw and lantana residues. He
and Liu (1992) observed that in rice straw-amended soil, porosity (>200 mm)
increased quickly after drying, which is favorable for land preparation and
sowing of upland crop in time after rice harvest. Beaton et al. (1992)
reported that addition of rice straw (6 t ha�1) over a 68-year period com-
pared to inorganic fertilizers reduced the volume weight and increased the
porosity of paddy soils in Japan.
3. Hydraulic Conductivity and Infiltration Rate
Crop residues aVect hydraulic conductivity and infiltration by modifying
soil structure, proportion of macropores, and aggregate stability. Marked
increases in hydraulic conductivity and infiltration have been reported in
treatments where crop residues were retained on the surface or incorporated
by conventional tillage over the treatments where residues were either
burned or removed (Murphy et al., 1993; Valzano et al., 1997). In a 6-year
rice–wheat cropping system on a clay loam soil in India, Sharma et al. (1987)
noted increased cumulative infiltration of 7.39 cm h�1 under residue incor-
poration over 5.70 cm h�1 under residue removal. Similarly, in long-term
experiments on rice–wheat cropping system, incorporation of both rice and
wheat straw, as compared to their burning or removal, increased both
Figure 6 EVect of crop residue and green manure application on infiltration characteristics
of a loamy sand soil (Meelu et al., 1994).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 333
infiltration rate and cumulative infiltration in sandy loam soils (Singh et al.,
1996; Walia et al., 1995). In another 5-year study on a rice–wheat cropping
system on a loamy sand soil, Meelu et al. (1994) observed increased rates of
infiltration on soil amended with green manure and crop residues (Fig. 6).
A mixed application of green manure and crop residues was more eVective in
increasing infiltration compared to their separate applications. On an alkali
clayey soil application, rice straw significantly increased hydraulic conduc-
tivity and total and quick drainage pores (El Samanoudy et al., 1993). In a
long-term rice–rice cropping system on a vertisol, Bellakki et al. (1998)
also noticed a significant increase in hydraulic conductivity of soil from
incorporation of rice straw (Table XIII).
4. Bulk Density, Compaction, and Penetration Resistance
In general, incorporation of crop residues into the paddy soils reduced
bulk density, penetration resistance, and compaction of soils under both
rice–rice and rice–wheat cropping systems (Bellakki et al., 1998; Meelu et al.,
1994; Singh et al., 1996; Walia et al., 1995). Xie et al. (1987) also reported
that continuous return of rice straw to a paddy field for 7 years resulted in a
soil bulk density decrease of 0.17 Mg m�3. In another long-term field
experiment over 25 years, incorporation of crop residues improved the
porosity and decreased penetration resistance of a gleyed soil (Roppongi
334 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
et al., 1993). Likewise, combined application of cereal crop residues and
green manure has proved to be more e Ycient in reducing bulk density,
penetration resistance, and crusting of surface soil layers over their separate
applications (Liu and Shen, 1992; Meelu et al., 1994; Verma and Singh,
1974).
Bhushan and Sharma (2002) reported that with the application of lantana
residues to a silty loam soil continuously for 10 years in rice–wheat rota-
tion, clods <2 cm in diameter increased while those 2–4 cm and 4–6 cm in
diameter decreased with straw additions. The mean weight diameter of clods
varied between 2.15 and 2.34 cm in lantana-treated soil versus 2.83 cm in the
control. The bulk density and breaking strength of soil clods were lower in
lantana-treated soil by 4–9% and 29–42% than in control, respectively.
About 23–47% less energy was required to prepare seed bed in lantana-
treated soil than in control soil. The long-term addition of residues caused a
fundamental change in soil structural processes. A significant change in soil
consistency and the related physical properties such as surface cracking and
clod formation occurred after the addition of residues continuously for 10
years. Lantana-treated soil would become friable relatively soon, thereby
decreasing the turnaround time after rice harvest.
5. Soil Moisture Characteristics
In a long-term (1920–1988) study in Japan, Beaton et al. (1992) found
that addition of rice straw increased the water retention in paddy soil at 0 to
3.2 pF moisture tension, while no e Vect was observed at pF 4.2. Rice straw,
thus, improved the supply of readily available water. In a 10-year field study
on a vertisol, the application of rice straw significantly improved the water
retention characteristics of paddy soil (Bellakki et al., 1998) (Table XIII).
Likewise, Lanjewar et al. (1992), Kushwaha et al. (2000), and Bhagat et al.
(2003) reported significant increase in the water holding capacity of soil after
straw incorporation compared with removal or burning. Pandey et al. (1985)
also observed that incorporation of rice and wheat straw for 5 years
increased soil water retention at �33 k Pa over straw removal.
Application of lantana residue for 10 years on a silty clay soil in a rice–
wheat cropping system in northwest India significantly increased the liquid
limit, plastic limit, shrinkage limit, and plasticity index (Bhushan and
Sharma, 2002). The friability limit of residue-treated soil decreased from
8.9 to 7.8–8.2% gravimetric moisture content of soil, but soil became friable
at a relatively higher moisture content. Soil cracking changed from wide,
deep cracks in a hexagonal pattern to a close-spaced network of cracks. The
cracks of sizes <5 mm increased and those of 10–20 mm and wider decreased
with residue additions.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 335
D. BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES
The role of soil organisms as primary agents of decomposition, energy
flow, and nutrient cycling has become the subject of increased interest. Crop
residues provide energy for growth and activities of microbes and substrate
for microbial biomass, and provide conditions for a source-sink of nutrients.
Crop residue management alters soil environment, thereby influencing
microbiological populations and activity in soil and subsequent nutrient
transformations.
1. Microbial Biomass
Microbial biomass, a small (1–5% by weight) but active fraction of soil
organic matter, is of particular concern in soil fertility considerations be-
cause it is more susceptible to management practices than the bulk organic
matter (Janzen, 1987). Soil microbial biomass (SMB) acts as a reservoir of
plant nutrients and is a major determinant for governing the nutrient (like N,
P, and S) availability in soils. Although SMB values are only a small portion
of total C and N in soils, this living portion of soil contains a substantial
amount of nutrients needed for crop growth. The amount of microbial
biomass and microbial activity depends on the supply of organic substrates
in soil. Therefore, regular addition of a suYcient amount of organic materi-
als such as crop residue is important in the maintenance of microbial
biomass and improvement of soil fertility.
Several researchers (Azmal et al., 1996; Sridevi et al., 2003) have reported
a marked increase in microbial biomass following incorporation of crop
residues. After straw incorporation, microbial biomass-C (MBC) increased
by two- to fivefold in 10 days and reached the highest value by 30 days. For
example, Ocio and Brooks (1990) observed that straw addition, compared to
control, increased the microbial biomass by 87.5% in a sandy loam soil and
by about 50% in a clay soil. Malik et al. (1998) found that application of
wheat straw and green manure in a rice–wheat cropping system caused a
large increase in microbial biomass during the initial phases of rice crop. An
increase in microbial biomass was sustained throughout the growing season
of rice and resulted in synchronization between N release and N uptake.
Patra et al. (1992) found more biomass C in wheat straw than in cowpea
residue-amended soil, but the amount of microbial biomass N (MBN) was
significantly higher in the latter. Azmal et al. (1997) reported that the
amount of microbial biomass C and N increased immediately after rice
straw incorporation into a clay loam soil incubated under aerobic condi-
tions, reached maximum values after 1 week of each application (2 g C as
rice straw kg�1 soil after every 6 weeks), and decreased thereafter. The level
336 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
of maximum biomass formation reached a ceiling after the second applica-
tion, suggesting that soil has a certain capacity to hold biomass.
Singh (1991) reported that microbial C was maximum in the wheat straw
(10 t ha�1) plus fertilizer treatment (408–420 mg g�1) followed by straw (360–
392 mg g�1) and fertilizer treatments (238–246 mg g�1) in rice-lentil (Lens
esculenta) crop rotation under dryland conditions. With time, straw plus
fertilizer treatment accumulated 77% more microbial biomass C over con-
trol. The initial flush of microbial activity probably results from rapid
catabolism of simple soluble C compounds initially present in crop residues.
Biomass N is in a constant state of turnover and represents a significant
proportion of the total N, which is relatively constant throughout the year.
Application of labeled wheat straw to a clay loam soil increased the biomass
N from 46 mg N in control to 80 mg N g�1 soil by day 5 and remained at this
level by day 20 (Ocio et al., 1991). Bremer and Van Kessel (1992) studied the
dynamics of microbial C and N following the addition of 14C- and 15N-
labeled lentil and wheat straw in a sandy loam soil under field conditions.
Microbial 15N accounted for 65 to 81% of the added residue 15N. The results
suggested that microbial biomass may reduce losses of N and other nutrients
during the periods of low crop demand and may act as a source of nutrients
during the active crop growth.
Kushwaha et al. (2000) reported that straw incorporation increased the
SMB carbon during crop growth from 214–264 mg g�1 in straw removal to
368–503 mg g�1 in straw incorporation treatment after two annual rice-
barley crop cycles. The MBC was increased by 48% and N by 60% in residue
retention over residue removal plots. Along with residue retention, tillage
reduction from conventional to zero increased the levels of MBC and MBN
over control. Addition of plant residues with a high C:N ratio may facilitate
transformation of fertilizer or soil N into a slowly available N and thus may
improve N use eYciency. Microbial biomass may act as slow-release fertiliz-
er. It has been reported that the larger and sustained microbial biomass
found under flooded compared to aerobic conditions may act to immobilize
more N and make it less available for plant uptake, as seen in the some areas
of the tropics (Cassman et al., 1995).
Bird et al. (2001) observed that soil microbial biomass was always signifi-
cantly greater when straw was incorporated than when it was burned.
Because soil microbial biomass is a prime source of available N for the
crop, the incorporation of straw led to an increase in the crop-available
soil N. Although the total N content did not change after 5 years of straw
incorporation or burning, a significant increase was noted in the more labile
soil N pools (humic substances).
Witt et al. (1998), however, observed no significant eVect of residue
incorporation on microbial biomass C and N, suggesting that microbial
biomasses are not sensitive indicators of processes governing net
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 337
N mineralization. Instead, incorporation of crop residues may have led to
enhanced microbial activity rather than microbial growth.
2. Microbial Population and Activity
Residue incorporation into the soil leads to increased bacterial and
fungal activities (Beare et al., 1996; Doran, 1980). For example, protein-
decomposing microorganisms increased during the early stages of incuba-
tion of rice straw under waterlogged conditions (Fujii et al., 1972), which
was followed by an increase in the population of cellulose-decomposing
microorganisms. Sulphate-reducing microorganisms then increased after a
lag phase. Nugroho and Kawatskka (1992a) observed that application of
rice straw (C:N ¼ 52:1) increased all the microbial populations. In that
study, simultaneous application of rice straw and NHþ4 –N to soil under
upland conditions increased the number of denitrifiers but significantly
depressed the N2 fixation activity. Beri et al. (1992) also observed that soil
treated with crop residues inhabited 5–10 times more aerobic bacteria and
1.5–11 times more fungi than the soil for which residues were either burned
or removed. Fujii et al. (1970), in contrast, found that with a short-term
incubation period (10 or 20 days) in an aerobic soil, the population of
nitrifying bacteria was higher in the absence of rice straw, but the reverse
was true with longer incubation periods (60 or 90 days). Ladatko and
Emtsev (1984) observed marked increase in the growth of Clostridium spp.
in a soil amended with rice straw. The increase in the growth of anaerobic
microorganisms was due to the formation of artificial anaerobic microsites
around the straw particles. Last but not least, residue quality may aVect the
microbial population, as smaller bacteria and fungal populations are greater
on cereal residues compared to those on legumes. As compared to bacteria,
fungi are more influenced by residue quality (Wardle, 1995).
3. Macroorganisms
Earthworms and micro-arthropods play a dominant role in organic mat-
ter decomposition and nutrient cycling associated with diVerent crop residue
management systems (Prasad and Power, 1991; Tian et al., 1993). Although
enough information is not available from rice-based cropping systems,
residue quality greatly influences macroorganism populations in the soil.
For example, the earthworm population was negatively correlated with the
C:N ratio, lignin:N ratio, and polyphenol concentration of the plant materi-
al (Tian et al., 1992), and the population of ants was significantly correlated
to N concentration of plant residues (Tian et al., 1993).
338 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
4. Enzyme Activities
Barreto and Westerman (1989) and Gill et al. (1998b) observed a signifi-
cant increase in urease activity in surface soils after incorporation of wheat
straw. Likewise, Guan (1989) reported that application of wheat straw
increased the invertase activity of soil by 40–90 times compared to the
control treatment in both laboratory and field experiments and that the
activities of urease and alkaline phosphatase were also increased by wheat
straw additions. Gialhe et al. (1976) observed that dehydrogenase activity
increased with rice and wheat straw incorporation and was further increased
by N application. Goyal and Chander (1998) also reported an increase in the
microbial biomass and dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphates activities
with the addition of wheat straw to a sandy loam soil.
E. CROP RESIDUES FOR RECLAMATION OF SALT-AFFECTED SOILS
Organic materials have been used as amendments for reclaiming saline
and sodic soils. Incorporation of crop residues can bring about favorable
changes in the physico-chemical properties of such soils. Puttaswamygowda
and Pratt (1973) reported that addition of straw to sodic soil prior to
submergence for 130 days substantially lowered the pH and exchangeable
sodium percentage and increased the Na, Ca, Mg, and Fe2þ ions and
electrical conductivity. Xie et al. (1987) observed that incorporation of
wheat straw with and without sesbania green manure (GM) to a silt loam
saline-alkali soil decreased salt concentration of the top soil in the first 3
years. Similarly, Swarup (1992) found that incorporation of wheat straw and
rice husk alone or in combination with GM into a sodic soil significantly
reduced the pH and exchangeable sodium percentage, and increased PCO2
and exchangeable Ca þ Mg and extractable Fe, Zn, Mn, and P. The degree
of improvement was in the order GM þ rice husk > GM þ wheat straw >GM > rice husk > wheat straw > control. The increased availability of
nutrients resulted in improved yields and nutrient uptake by rice. Marked
decreases in pH, exchangeable sodium percentage, and electrical conductivi-
ty of salt-aVected soils amended with crop residues have also been reported
by many other workers (Abdul-Wahid et al., 1998; Hussain et al., 1996;
Illayas et al., 1997; More, 1994).
In a lysimeter study using calcareous sandy loam soil under a rice–
wheat–maize fodder system, Sekhon and Bajwa (1993) reported that
irrigation with sodic water caused precipitation of Ca and increased the
accumulation of Na in the soil and adversely aVected the crop yields.
Incorporation of rice straw decreased the precipitation of Ca and carbonates
increased the removal of Na in drainage water, decreased pH and electrical
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 339
conductivity of the soil, and improved crop yields. The release of organic
acids during decomposition of residues possibly mobilized the soil Ca. The
quantity of gypsum required for controlling the harmful eVect of sodic
irrigation water on soil properties can be considerably reduced in the
presence of crop residues.
Incorporation of wheat straw into a saline soil at 7 t ha�1 for 3 years
improved soil physical properties such as bulk density, pore volume, and soil
water retention and improved soil productivity (Wang et al., 1988). Im-
provement in soil physical properties (bulk density, porosity, and hydraulic
conductivity) due to addition of crop residues was also reported by Hussain
et al. (1996). Thus, recycling of crop residues on salt-aVected soils is likely to
have greater benefits than on normal soils (Swarup, 1992; Abdul-Wahid
et al., 1998).
VII. BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN FIXATION
Naturally occurring heterotrophic and phototrophic bacteria use the
straw either directly by the use of hemicellulose and simple carbohydrates
or indirectly following the decomposition of cellulose by decomposer micro-
organisms. Asymbiotic N2-fixing bacteria can use crop residues for energy
through the use of some hemicellulose components (Halsall et al., 1985) or
products of straw decomposition (Roper and Halsall, 1986). The heterotro-
phic diazotrophs depend on carbon for energy. Since most N2-fixing bacteria
are unable to use cellulose directly as a substrate for N2 fixation, cellulose
must be degraded to simpler intermediates before being used by diazotrophs.
Adachi et al. (1989) showed the existence of linkage between anaerobic
cellulytic bacteria and anaerobic N2-fixing bacteria during the decomposi-
tion of straw. The role of crop residues in biological N2 fixation by hetero-
trophic and phototrophic bacteria has been reviewed in detail by Roper and
Ladha (1995).
Anaerobic conditions and a decrease in inorganic N content of soil
following incorporation of straw favor N2 fixation by heterotrophic and
phototrophic bacteria in waterlogged soils (Yoneyama et al., 1977). Under
laboratory conditions, a wide range of values of N2 fixation (0.8 to 7.07 mg
N fixed per g of straw in 14 to 56 days) have been obtained due to diVerences
in the form and amount of straw, time of incubation, and methods used for
quantification (Roper and Watanabe, 1986). Only a few quantitative data
on the amount of N2 fixed or N gained following straw application in
greenhouse or field conditions are available.
Enhanced N2 fixation in flooded soils amended with straw has been
reported by Rice and Paul (1972) and Charyulu and Rao (1981). Rao
340 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
(1980) estimated that N2 fixation in 30 days in flooded soil amended with
chopped straw at 5 or 10 t ha�1 and planted to rice was two to four times
that of the unamended control. Based on a per hectare furrow slice of 0.7 �106 kg dry soil ha�1, extrapolation of the values of 15N incorporation in
straw-amended soil in a 30-day experiment indicates N2 fixation of about
7 kg ha�1 in the unamended soil and 25 kg N ha�1 in straw-amended soil.
Santiago-Ventura et al. (1986) measured twice the N gain following straw
incorporation equivalent to 10 t ha�1 after the three consecutive rice crops
compared with control pots; N gain ranged from 2 to 4 mg N fixed g�1 straw
added. Nugroho and Kwatsuka (1992b) found maximum rates of N2 fixa-
tion as stimulated by rice straw amendment to be as high as 220 mg g�1
day�1 when the level of NHþ4 –N in the soil was below 7.8 mg N kg�1 soil.
High levels of NH4–N (98–298 mg kg�1 soil) inhibited the initial N2 fixation
activity. When denitrification occurred at high rates, N2 fixation was sup-
pressed and vice versa. Yoo et al. (1990) reported that surface application of
rice straw increased the pH of the floodwater to an optimum level for the
growth of N2-fixing microorganisms, and thereby increased the N2 fixation
by phototrophic bacteria and blue-green algae.
In aerobic soils, intese microbial activity during the decomposition of
crop residues results in the development of anaerobic and microaerobic
microsites in soils, including surface soils (Hill et al., 1990). These sites can
support N2 fixation by a wide range of free-living, diazotrophic bacteria,
including anaerobic bacteria. In situ measurements of N2 fixation associated
with wheat straw indicated amounts fixed (based on the acetylene reduction
technique) ranging from 1 kg N ha�1 in 31 days to 12.3 kg N ha�1 in 22 days
(Roper, 1983). The amount of wheat straw added to soil ranged from 4.3 to
7.2 t ha�1 under conditions where moisture was not limiting (i.e., field
capacity). In a laboratory incubation study, Saha et al. (1995) observed
that berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum) and rice straw significantly increased
aerobic nonsymbiotic N2-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria,
and S-oxidizing microorganisms, resulting in greater availability of N, P,
and S in the soil.
Crop residue-associated N2 fixation is modified by mineral N, tempera-
ture, moisture, oxygen concentration, soil characteristics, and straw man-
agement techniques (Roper and Ladha, 1995). In fact, straw decomposition
is also directly aVected by these factors. In a field experiment, Roper (1983)
observed a positive correlation (r ¼ þ0.98) between nitrogenase activity and
wheat straw decomposition. As already discussed, the N2 fixation rates in
straw-amended soils are higher under waterlogged conditions than under
upland conditions (Rao, 1976). Roper et al. (1994) found that nitrogenase
activity under field conditions was the highest with straw incorporation and
the activity decreased in the order straw incorporation > straw mulched >no tillage. The depth of straw incorporation into soil also aVected the
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 341
nitrogenase activity. Straw mixed lightly with the soil near the surface
produced significantly higher nitrogenase activity than soil in which straw
was incorporated throughout the plough layer (Roper et al., 1989). Kanungo
et al. (1997) recorded higher nitrogenase activity in the top 1–2 cm soil layer
after the placement of organic residues, while residue placement in 2–6 cm
layers significantly reduced nitrogenase activity, irrespective of soil type. The
high nitrogenase activity in the topsoil was associated with larger popula-
tions of Azospirillum, Azotobacter, and anaerobic N2 fixers and favorable
redox potential supporting growth of N2 fixers.
VIII. PHYTOTOXICITY ASSOCIATED WITH CROPRESIDUE INCORPORATION INTO THE SOIL
The adverse e Vects of substances originating from decomposing crop
residues have long been considered as a cause of poor growth and yield of
many crops (Patrick et al., 1963). Since breakdown of cellulose occurs
readily, many of the adverse e Vects of residues occur within a relatively
short time after the incorporation of residues and the sowing of the follow-
ing crop. Warmer climates further accelerate the breakdown of crop resi-
dues. Thus, incorporation of crop residues can have adverse e Vects on
subsequent crops other than rice if anaerobic conditions develop (Cannell
and Lynch, 1984). However, anaerobic decomposition of crop residues with
no-tillage may have adverse e Vects on seedling establishment of rice. Lynch
(1977) reported that under certain conditions, substances toxic to cereal
seedlings are produced by cereal residues that decay near the seedlings.
These findings assume greater importance when crops are grown immediately
after cereals and with minimal cultivation. When seed drills operate in soils
where crop residues are placed on the soil surface or are only shallowly
incorporated, seed and residue can be placed in close contact, particularly in
fine-textured soils.Wet conditions that lead to anaerobic decomposition of the
residues can adversely aVect seedling growth (Elliott et al., 1978; Kimbler,
1973). Kimbler (1973) reported that the degree of inhibition of growth of
wheat by wheat straw depended on the length of decomposition period and
was greatest when the period was only 2–6 days. Surface retention leads to
slow decomposition, and incorporation is recommended as soon as possible.
Phytotoxic substances (e.g., phenolic acid and acetic acid) are produced
from degrading crop residues preferentially under anaerobic soil conditions
(at least in localized zones) and seldom accumulate in aerobic soil because of
rapid metabolization by microorganisms. Gaur and Pareek (1974), however,
detected a larger number of phenolic and aliphatic acids under aerobic
than under anaerobic conditions. In a laboratory incubation study, the
342 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
addition of rice or wheat straw produced large amounts of acetic acid
under anaerobic conditions 4 to 8 days after the incorporation of straw
(Bhat, 1991). Tanaka et al. (1990) reported that straw incorporation resulted
in accumulation of reducing substances and various aliphatic aromatic
acids in soil, which can inhibit rice root growth. Low temperature and
acidity further favor the production and persistence of fatty acids (Cho
and Ponnamperuma, 1971). At temperatures over 30 8C, these acids disap-
pear within 2–3 weeks of straw incorporation. The organic acids are phyto-
toxic in the millimolar concentration range and can cause significant crop
losses, which can be between 13 and 29% in heavy clay soils when seed is
direct drilled in the presence of wheat straw in winter (Graham et al., 1986).
Studies on homogenous slurries of a soil in a chemostat showed that the
formation of organic acids from plant residues is primarily linked to Eh; the
critical Eh being about zero (Lynch and Gunn, 1978).
Goodlass and Smith (1978) observed that evolution of C2H4 from soils
under anaerobic conditions was stimulated by amending soils with barley or
wheat straw. Temporary anaerobic conditions resulted in large increases in
C3 and C4 hydrocarbons. The association between degradation products and
C2H4 suggests that both may be implicated when root growth is adversely
aVected by the anaerobic decomposition of plant residues. Wu et al. (1997)
observed that application of rice straw increased the level of reducing
substances in soil at 20 days after application and reduced rice plant weight
at 30 and 70 days after planting. In a greenhouse study, Sharma et al. (1989)
found that total water soluble organic acids extracted from the root zone of
rice plants (100 mm soil depth) increased with increasing amounts of rice
straw (Fig. 7), but the acid production decreased with increasing rate of
percolation. Highest acid concentration (364 m mol L�1) was obtained with
the addition of 20 t rice straw ha�1 and a percolation rate of 15 mm day�1.
The organic acids formed at 2 weeks after transplanting did not persist in
soil solution; rather, they disappeared rapidly and the rice yields were same
under all the treatments.
The toxic eVects of aliphatic acids on rice growth have been widely
studied. Most investigations have been of short term and on young
plants. Nevertheless, in several instances, quite low concentrations of acetic
acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid have killed rice seedlings (Rao and
Mikkelsen, 1977). The injury caused by monobasic aliphatic acids depends
on the type of acid present and its concentration. The inhibitory eVect on
rice seedlings generally increases with increasing molecular weight, increas-
ing with order formic, acetic, propionic, and butyric acid (Chandrasekaran
and Yoshida, 1973). Tanaka et al. (1990) observed that rice root elongation
was markedly inhibited by the solution extracted from flooded soil
with incorporated wheat straw; the extract contained aliphatic and pheno-
lic acids under acidic conditions. Huang and Lu (1996) reported that
Figure 7 Temporal changes in volatile organic acid concentrations in the soil solution
collected at 100 mm soil depth as aVected by added rice straw (mean of three percolation rates)
(Sharma et al., 1989).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 343
pre-flooding after rice straw incorporation for 2 weeks is suYcient for
oVsetting any adverse eVect due to phytotoxicity and N deficiency in rice.
Wallace and Whitehead (1980) have reported that volatile fatty acids are
more toxic than nonvolatile aliphatic acids between 0.5 and 1.0 mM con-
centrations and that the organic acids produced at one site do not diVuse
very far onto the soil. Therefore, the establishing crop roots must not come
into close contact with decomposing residues.
Adverse eVects of decomposing residues on crops under aerobic condi-
tions have been widely reported (Bhowmik and Doll, 1982). Phenolic acids
such as ferulic, p-coumaric, and p-hydroxybenzaldehyde released from living
or dead tissues of variety of plant species caused adverse eVects on the
growth of crops (Nelson, 1996). Elliott et al. (1981) could not demonstrate
the phytotoxicity to winter wheat on plots when wheat straw was mixed into
the soil. N immobilization during straw decomposition rather than phyto-
toxicity appeared to be the primary factor adversely aVecting yield because
yield decline was largely overcome by high rate of N application. Chung
(2001) identified p-hydroxy benzoic acid (6.34–6.87 mg kg�1), p-coumaric
acid (0.34 mg g�1) and ferulic acid (0.05 mg g�1) during the decomposition
of rice straw. The nature and composition of allelopathic compounds
depended on the type of crop residue or variety. P-hydroxy benzoic acid
344 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
(10�3 M) showed the greatest inhibitory eVect on barnyard grass seed
germination, seedling growth, and dry weight.
In the rice field, the concentration of phytotoxins varies during the growth
period of the crop and is probably greater in the early stages of flooding. It
may also vary spatially within the rhizosphere. The rice crop can also show
considerable compensatory growth from adverse eVects on early growth after
rice straw has been ploughed into the soil (Gotoh and Onikura, 1971).
Organic acids accumulated around straw only in the early stages of decompo-
sition, and hence if straw decomposition could be accelerated by any means,
the danger period for seedling could be reduced. The concentration of organic
acids in flooded soils in the tropics receiving 5–10 t ha�1 of straw is not toxic
to rice (Ponnamperuma, 1984). Witt et al. (2000) noted no evidence that
late residue incorporation caused phytotoxic eVects as a result of reduced
organic compounds or toxins produced during residue decomposition.
It is recommended to plough crop residues shortly after harvest is com-
pleted, because the decomposition of the straw occurs early after incorpora-
tion, the phytotoxicity occurring in the initial period of growth of the rice
plant can be alleviated, and stable yields can be obtained.
IX. WEED CONTROL AND HERBICIDE EFFICIENCY
Weeds are a major problem in the productivity of rice-based cropping
systems. Depending upon their type and intensity, 20 to 50% or even greater
losses in grain yields of rice and wheat are common due to competition from
the weeds (Walia and Brar, 2003). Most studies in weed control in rice and
other crops have been confined to evaluating the eVects of herbicide, tillage,
water, and their interactions (Bhagat et al., 1999; Gajri et al., 1999). Few
studies have been conducted on the dynamics of weed population and
herbicide eYciency under residue management in rice-based cropping sys-
tems. Such information is needed in weed control strategies for rice-based
cropping systems to improve their productivity. Kumar and Goh (2000)
reported that crop residues can suppress weeds in many ways, for example,
(1) through their physical presence on the soil surface as mulch and by
restricting solar radiation reaching below the mulch layer, (2) by direct
suppression caused by allelopathy, and (3) by controlling N availability.
Burning of residues can help in eVective removal of weed seeds and weeds.
The major disadvantage of incorporation of rice straw compared to burning
is the increase in weed and possible pest pressure. Roeder et al. (1998)
reported that compared with farmers’ traditional burning of crop and
weed residues, mulching reduced rice yield by 43% in one out of four
comparisons and increased weed biomass by 19–100%.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 345
In addition to influencing the weed growth and population, crop residue
management and tillage practices also influence the eYciency of soil-applied
pre-emergence herbicides (Kumar and Goh, 2000). Because pre-emergence
herbicides are applied to the soil, the amount and quality of residues and ash
content left behind after residue burning might aVect their activity. Contin-
uous burning or incorporation of residues of both crops over years results in
buildup of ash or organic matter in the soil. The eYciency of soil-applied
herbicides may decline because of increased absorption capacity of soil. Brar
et al. (1998), however, observed that there was no significant eVect of
burning or incorporation of crop residues on the eYcacy of butachlor
applied to rice and isoproturon applied to wheat in a rice–wheat cropping
system. Mt. Pleasant et al. (1992) observed that mulching residues had little
eVect on weed control and crop yields were always higher when residues
were incorporated in a rice-based cropping system. The reports on the eVect
of crop residue management practices on weed growth and herbicide
eYciency are not conclusive and need further investigation to improve the
productivity of rice-based cropping systems.
The eVects of crop residue management on the pests and diseases in
rice-based cropping systems in the tropics have not received much attention.
X. EMISSION OF GREENHOUSE GASES
Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) are important greenhouse gases,
N2O being about 300 and CH4 being 15 times more radiatively active than
CO2 (mass basis, considering residence time in the atmosphere) (Rodhe,
1990). Flooded rice soils are a major source of atmospheric CH4, contribut-
ing about 10% of the total global emissions of CH4 (Mitra et al., 1999; Neue
and Sass, 1996; Rennenberg et al., 1992; Sass et al., 1990; Wassmann et al.,
1998). Global methane emission from flooded rice fields has been estimated
at 20–100 Tg year�1 (Neue, 1993). In comparison, the total agricultural
sources of N2O are quite small, ranging from 0.03 to 3.0 Tg N year�1
(IPCC, 1996).
Incorporation of organic materials (crop residues, green manures, com-
post) to regenerate depleted soil resources and promote sustainable food
productions in the tropics should significantly increase CH4 emissions. Thus,
residue management strategies may create conflicts between the goals of
sustainable agriculture and mitigation of greenhouse gases when used in
flooded rice-based systems. Soil properties, water management, organic
amendment, and temperature have been reported as the major factors
controlling the amount of CH4 emitted from rice fields (Sass et al., 1991;
Schutz et al., 1989). It has been estimated that CH4 emissions from rice
346 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
cultivation in India (45 million ha) should not exceed 2.5 t year�1. The main
reason for low CH4 emissions from rice fields in India is that the soils have
very low organic C or receive very little organic amendments (Jain et al.,
2000). The burning of crop residues also contributes to the global CH4
budget. For each ton of crop residue burned, 2.3 kg CH4 is emitted (Grace
et al., 2003). In rice–wheat cropping system, 0.14 t year�1 will be emitted, if
one-half of the 12 million ha under rice–wheat cropping system is burned.
A. METHANE
Organic C from added crop residues, organic manures, soil organic
matter, or rice plant roots is the major driving force for CH4 production in
rice-based agriculture systems (Wang et al., 1992; Yagi and Minami, 1990).
Numerous studies from all over the world have demonstrated that added
crop residues, composts, and green manures enhance CH4 fluxes relative to
unamended controls (Bossio et al., 1999; Chen et al., 1993; Chidthaisong
et al., 1996; Glissmann and Conard, 1999; Neue et al., 1994; Rath et al.,
1999; Wassmann et al., 1993). The seasonal emissions from paddy rice with
organic additions ranged from 1.1 to 148 g CH4 m�2 and increased methane
emissions 1.2- to 32-fold over unamended control soils. Crop residues serve
as a substrate for a complex microbial community, including methanogenic
microorganisms. Most studies on the microbiological aspect of CH4 produc-
tion in flooded rice soil have focused on methanogens (Asakawa and
Hayano, 1995; Asakawa et al., 1998). In addition to methanogens, the
degradation of organic matter to its most reduced status (CH4), however,
involves at least two other kinds of nonmethanogens: the zymogenic bacteria
and the acetic acid- and hydrogen-producing bacteria. Thus, from the point
of view of microbiological ecology, diVerent eVects of various organic ferti-
lizers on CH4 production potential might be closely related to the amount of
easily decomposable organic matter.
In principle, the degradation pattern in soils with and without amended
straw is similar, with acetate, propionate, and H2 as the main intermediates
of anaerobic degradation and CH4 being formed from H2/CO2 (11–27%)
and acetate (84–89%). However, the early phase of straw degradation diVers,
as a large variety of fatty acids accumulate transiently (Glissmann and
Conard, 1999). A study by Weber et al. (2001) indicated that the methano-
gens colonizing rice straw are less diverse than those inhabiting the soil.
Polysaccharolytic bacteria in rice soils constitute the first step in the degra-
dation process and eventually produce substrates needed for the production
of CH4. Distinct trends of multiple rate patterns for CH4 emission from
waterlogged soils have been shown in laboratory and field studies (Hou et al.,
2000). The first peak, between 20 and 40 days at 25 8C, probably originated
Figure 8 EVect of rice straw application on methane production in a sandy soil (Hou et al.,
2000).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 347
from the decomposition of easily decomposable forms of C in the rice straw,
such as microbial products and polysaccharides (Watanabe et al., 1995). The
second change in rate of CH4 emission observed may have been associated
with the decomposition of structural components of the rice straw, such as
cellulose and lignin.
The e Vect of rice straw application on CH4 production potential is shown
in Fig. 8. Methane production in the treatment without rice straw supple-
ment occurred at a much lower rate during the whole period of incubation, in
which the highest production rate was less than 40 mg CH4 kg�1 soil day �1.
After the application of rice straw, the CH4 production rate increased
substantially. Both the quantity and the quality of added organic materials
influence CH4 emission from soils. Yagi and Minami (1991) showed that
while rice straw increased CH4 emission by a factor of 3.3, addition of rice
straw compost increased CH4 emission only slightly compared to the appli-
cation of mineral fertilizers. The extent and variability of observed methane
enhancements by organic additions are governed by several factors, the most
obvious being quantity. Schutz et al. (1989) established that CH4 emissions
from paddy rice progressively increased with increasing rice straw additions
from 3 to 12 t ha�1. Straw levels over 12 t ha�1 did not increase CH4 fluxes
further. Likewise, Wang et al. (1992) found increasing CH4 flux to be
proportional to rice straw input levels. A field study (Yagi and Minami,
1990) also showed that rice straw applied at rates of 6–9 t ha�1 enhanced
CH4 emission rates by 1.8–3.5 times. As reported by Sass et al. (1991) and
348 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Watanabe et al. (1995), CH4 production was enhanced by the addition of
straw in flooded soil only.
Watanabe et al. (1995) proposed a simple straw rate response model to
predict cumulative CH4 emissions from a known rice straw application to
any soil:
Y ¼ k½aðEÞ=ð1 þ bðEÞe�cðEÞxÞ� þ Yð0Þ; ð8Þ
where Y is the fractional increase in CH4 emission relative to a chemical
fertilizer control, and x is the level of incorporated organic matter (t ha�1).
Adjustments to the coeYcients a, b, and c were added to account for
responses to temperature (E) and diVerences of soil type (k). Such modifica-
tions reflect observations that daily and seasonal CH4 fluxes are temperature
dependent (Parashar et al., 1991; Schutz et al., 1989; Yagi and Minami,
1991). Incubation studies have shown that large diVerences in CH4
production potential of soils are related to organic C content (Majumdar
et al., 1998).
The extent and rapidity with which added organic materials are decom-
posed depend greatly on chemical composition, including C:N ratio, lignin
and polyphenol content, and other critical compounds. Yadvinder-Singh
and van Cleemput (1998) reported that maximum methane (9980 mg g�1)
was emitted from soil amended with sugar beet leaves, and emissions of CH4
from wheat and rice straw were 4953 and 5030 mg g�1 in 40 days in a silty
clay soil under flooded conditions. The emissions of CH4 from composted
farmyard manure and poultry manure-amended soils were very low.
From an incubation experiment in a Chinese flooded rice soil, Hou et al.
(2000) reported that organic matter, added as rice straw and organic manure
(pig, chicken, and cattle manure), increased CH4 production rate significant-
ly. The results showed that organic manures had diVerent promoting eVects,
with pig manure increasing the CH4 production rate most, followed by rice
straw, chicken, and cattle manure. The CH4 production potential caused by
organic manures was closely related neither to the total C added to the
system nor to the C:N ratio of the materials. A significant linear relationship
between CH4 production and the logarithm of the number of zymogenic
bacteria was found, with an r value of 0.96. This finding suggests that the
number of zymogenic bacteria may be used as an index to predict CH4
production potential in flooded rice fields.
Bronson et al. (1997a) observed that organic matter additions as rice
straw (5.5 t ha�1, dry) or green manure (Sesbania rostrata, 12 t ha�1, wet)
stimulated methane flux several-fold. Rice straw resulted in higher CH4
emissions than GM. The GM plots showed highest CH4 fluxes in the first
2 weeks, but thereafter straw–amended emitted the most CH4. Green ma-
nure has more easily decomposable C than straw, although more C was
added as straw. Sesbania green manure, being easily degradable material,
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 349
required the lower activation energy by methanogens to use the substrate as
C source than wheat straw (Bhat and Beri, 2002). Rice straw applied before
the winter fallow period reduced CH4 emission by 11% compared with that
obtained from fields to which the same amount of rice straw was applied
during field preparation. Surface mulching of straw instead of incorporation
into the soil showed 12% less emission.
Composts consistently produced lower CH4 emissions than fresh green
manures or straws. Aerobic composting reduces readily decomposable car-
bon to CO2 instead of CH4 (Inoko, 1984) and also modifies the original
organic constituents to forms more resistant to subsequent degradation
(Watanabe et al., 1995). Consequently, when compost is incorporated into
anaerobic soils, less available carbon is present for methanogenesis. Howev-
er, the agricultural benefit derived from compost is maintained, especially if
composts are applied year after year (Inoko, 1984). Thus, composting pro-
vides a compatible option for adding organic materials to flooded soils
without substantially enhancing methane emissions. Following the same
principal, Miura (1995) found that fall rice straw incorporation or winter
mulching combined with spring incorporation significantly reduced CH4
emissions during the subsequent summer rice season.
Jain et al. (2000) reported that additions of organic manures and crop
residues enhanced CH4 emissions from rice fields. There were wide varia-
tions in CH4 emissions because of the variety of organic amendments.
Rice fields amended with biogas slurry emitted significantly less CH4 than
those amended with other organic amendments. They further reported that
CH4 emission rates were very low (between 16 and 40 kg CH4 ha�1 season�1)
when the field was flooded permanently. Application of organic manure
(FYM plus wheat straw) in combination with urea (1:1 N basis) enhanced
CH4 emission by 12–20% compared with fields treated with urea only. The
site in New Delhi represents one example of very low CH4 emissions from
rice fields. Emissions from other sites in northern India may be higher than
those in New Delhi, but they are still lower than in other rice growing
regions in India. Jain et al. (2000) reported that organic amendment inputs
promoted CH4 emissions, but total emission remained less than 25 kg CH4
ha�1. This finding contrasts with results from other network stations with
irrigated rice where total emissions generally exceeded 100 kg CH4 ha�1 after
manure application (Wassmann et al., 2000a). The low impact of organic
manure in the experiment in New Delhi could be related to high percolation
rates. Constant inflow of oxygen into the soil and downward discharge of
methanogenic substrate resulted in low CH4 production (Inubushi et al.,
1992; Yagi et al., 1994). Thus, emissions were very low even when organic
matter was applied. In other stations of the network, organic amendments
stimulated emissions during the first half of the season (Wassmann et al.,
2000b).
350 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Ishibashi et al. (2001) studied the eVect of surface application of rice straw
in no-till rice on methane emission in three soils during rice growing season.
It was found that CH4 emissions from the no-tilled direct-seeded field on the
average were 21, 47, and 91% of that from the tilled transplanted field in
high-percolating site, low-percolating site, and extremely low-percolating
(4.4 mm day�1) site, respectively. Straw incorporation leads to significantly
more methane production than burning or removal. Over the long term,
however, incorporation may provide benefits through the accumulation of
C as soil organic matter.
B. NITROUS OXIDE
The biologically mediated reduction processes of nitrification and denitri-
fication are dominant sources of N2O generation in soils (Paul and Clark,
1989). Nitrous oxide is also produced to a much lesser extent by the abiotic
process of chemodenitrification (Bremner, 1997). Denitrification processes
can terminate with N2O, or, more commonly, N2O is further reduced to N2
gas. Conditions that promote N2O emissions over N2 are high NO�3 levels
and/or increasing O�2 , while increasing organic carbon levels tend to favor
N2 production (Firestone, 1982). Nitrous oxide emissions from rice fields
occur as a result of nitrification–denitrification during periods of alternating
wetting and drying. Emissions are usually small in irrigated rice systems with
good water control and small to moderate inputs of fresh organic material
(OM) (Bronson et al., 1997a,b).
Bronson et al. (1997a) reported that organic amendments, particularly
rice straw, helped in reducing N2O emissions. In the flooded rice soil, straw
addition possibly stimulates O2 consumption in the aerobic soil layer and in
the rhizosphere, resulting in smaller zones in which nitrification can occur.
Enhanced immobilization of fertilizer N with straw would result in less NH4
available for nitrification–denitrification. Additionally, the high CH4 con-
centration in straw-amended soil could inhibit nitrification (McCarty and
Bremner, 1991). Methane emissions ranged from 3 to 557 kg CH4 ha�1 with
an average of 182 kg CH4 ha�1.
Few measurements have been published for N2O emissions from flooded
rice soils amended with organic materials. The existing information indicates
that N2O emissions from flooded soils with organic additions are similar to
or less than soils receiving chemical fertilizers, indicating that organic
amendments do not appear to influence N2O emissions very much.
Most information on N2O emissions from rice soils focuses on water
management and nitrogen fertilizers as controlling variables (Cai et al.,
1997, 1999). A trade-oV relationship between CH4 and N2O, i.e., conditions
that favor CH4 production suppress N2O and vice versa, is also well
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 351
recognized (Mosier et al., 1998a). So, while organic amendments seemingly
have no impact on N2O emissions from flooded soils, management practices
before or after rice may produce a significant e Vect.
Aulakh et al. (2001) showed that denitrification is a significant N loss
process under wetland rice amounting to 33% of the recommended dose of
120 kg N ha�1 on a permeable sandy loam soil. Integrated management
of wheat straw (6 t ha �1) and GM (20 t ha�1 supplying 88 kg N ha�1) and
32 kg N ha�1 as urea fertilizer N significantly reduced cumulative gaseous
N losses to 51.6 kg N ha�1 as compared to 58.2 kg N ha �1 for 120 kg N ha�1
alone. The gaseous losses under wheat were 0.6–2% of the applied fertilizer
N. Interplay between the availability of NO3 and organic C largely con-
trolled denitrification and N2O fluxes in flooded summer-grown rice, where-
as temperature and soil aeration status were the primary regulators of the
nitrification–denitrification processes and gaseous N losses during winter
grown upland wheat. The irrigated rice–wheat system is a significant source
of N2O, as it emits around 15 kg N2O–N ha�1 year �1.
The quantity of organic additions may also aVect N2O emissions. In one
of the few studies looking at the impact of organic materials on N2O,
Bronson et al. (1997a) suggested that organic additions to flooded soils
stimulated oxygen depletion to the point of inhibiting nitrification and
thereby N2O emissions. From this, one could hypothesize that increased
oxygen depletion with more organic material and consequently N2O emis-
sions would decline even more. Burning of crop residues also contributes to
the global N2O budget. For each ton of crop residue that is burned, 40 g
N2O is emitted (Grace et al., 2003).
C. MITIGATION STRATEGIES
The objective of reducing CH4 emissions must be combined with
improvements associated with increased yields and straw recycling; adhering
to CH4 emission quotas might increasingly aVect rice production practices.
Possible mitigation options for reducing methane emission from rice fields
include reduced length of flooding, temporary drainage (Wassmann et al.,
2000b), rice cultivar selection, kind and application mode of mineral fertili-
zers, and soil and crop management strategies to achieve a high acceptance
(Mosier et al., 1998a,b; Neue, 1993; Yagi et al., 1994). CH4 emission was
reduced significantly by early incorporation of rice straw during the fallow
period, adding to the agronomic benefit of this practice.
Bronson et al. (1997b) recorded seasonal N2O emissions during a fallow
period as high as 172 and 183 mg N m�2, where rice straw and a green
manure had been incorporated the previous season, respectively. Such emis-
sions might be considered maximums because assimilation of nitrogen
352 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
mineralized from organic additions by fallow weed species or upland crops
helps to retain N within the system and minimize N2O emissions (Buresh
et al., 1993). Given the influence of soil type, climate, and organic additions
on CH4 and N2O emissions, comprehensive studies are needed to quantify
more thoroughly the trade-oV eVects between CH4 and N2O during an
annual cycle within rice-based cropping systems.
Water management is an important management factor when trying to
minimize CH4 or N2O emissions from rice-based cropping systems. Mid-
season drainage, which originally was developed in Japan as a means to
supply oxygen to rice roots, is also very eVective in reducing seasonal CH4
emissions from rice (Jain et al., 2000; Yagi and Minami, 1990). Despite
projected decreases in CH4 emission by such methods, aerobic soil condi-
tions during fallow and upland cropping intervals between rice crops
enhance N2O emissions generated by nitrification of mineralized organic
N and subsequent denitrification of NO3 when flooding is reestablished
(Bronson and Mosier, 1993). Unintentional mid-season drainage is possible
in many rice cropping systems of South and Southeast Asia where light
textured soils or water distribution and management problems influence
the ability of farmers to keep their soils flooded (Jain et al., 2000). Site-
specific adaptations will be required for an optimum eVect, considering rice
yields, water consumption, and CH4 emissions.
In summary, methane emissions can be reduced significantly by adopting
the following mitigation practices: water management through intermittent
irrigation or drainage, the use of composted organic manures instead of
fresh manure, allowing pre-decomposition of crop residues under aerobic
conditions before rice planting, and the selection of suitable cultivars that
emit less CH4. It appears that composted organic additions are the best way
to meet sustainable agriculture goals while minimizing greenhouse gas emis-
sions from paddy rice. Adding crop residues or green manures in suYcient
quantities to increase soil organic matter levels or replenish deficient nutri-
ents for flooded rice exacerbates N2O emissions to unacceptable levels. Of
course, it is important to establish that CH4 and N2O emissions arising from
the composting process do not exceed emissions during rice cultivation.
Direct dry seeding of rice as well as other crops following rice into surface
residues will reduce N2O and CH4 emissions. Grace et al. (2003) suggested
three feasible, cost-eVective agronomic interventions that would have an
immediate eVect by reducing greenhouse gases production in the rice–
wheat cropping systems and that will no doubt be applicable to other rice-
based cropping systems in the tropics: (1) a reduction in residue burning, (2) a
reduction in flood irrigation frequency for rice, and (3) the use of minimum
or no tillage for upland crops following rice (e.g., wheat or maize). It was
estimated that Adopting these measures would result in total savings in CO2
equivalent emissions of 1680 kg ha�1 year�1.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 353
XI. AGRONOMIC RESPONSES TO CROPRESIDUE MANAGEMENT
Recycling of crop residues is an essential component in achieving sustain-
ability in crop production systems. Since crops respond diVerently to the
application of diVerent organic materials to soil, evaluation of crop residues
in terms of fertilizer eVect is complicated by the variable nutrient contents of
the materials and the host of other eVects (as already discussed) these may
have on crops and soils. In some cases, straw incorporation can actually
lead to a reduction in crop yields due to release of phytotoxic compounds
during decomposition and immobilization of soil and fertilizer N, causing
N deficiency in the crop planted immediately after straw incorporation. In
many studies in which crop residues proved to be superior to inorganic
fertilizers, the eVect may be due only to better supply of nutrients from
organic matter. It is, in fact, impossible to monitor all the eVects of organic
matter on nutrient availability. Evaluation of the fertilizer eVects of an
organic resource (e.g., for N) requires that the material be assessed both at
an equal N application and on equal mass (or carbon) application, prefera-
bly in each case over a range of application rates. The eVect of residue
incorporation on succeeding crops depends on the amount of residues and
the time and method of incorporation. Though the long-term eVects of crop
residue incorporation are generally expected to be beneficial in terms of
increasing soil organic matter content, availability of nutrients, cation ex-
change capacity, and microbial, the time scale for these improvements is
generally long (e.g., >5 years). However, improvements in soil conditions do
not always flow to yields. Thus, despite the very large body of literature on
the recycling of crop residues, there exists very little information that enables
proper evaluation of organic residues for their fertilizer value.
A. RICE–WHEAT CROPPING SYSTEM
1. Effect on Crop Yields
Crop residue management as practiced in the rice–wheat cropping system
is of three types (1) wheat straw management in rice and its residual eVect in
following wheat, (2) rice straw management in wheat and its residual eVect
in following rice, and (3) wheat straw management in rice and rice straw
management in wheat (cumulative eVect). In several studies, incorporation
of wheat straw into the soil had pronounced but variable eVects on the
growth and yield of subsequent rice (Table XV). For example, in a field
experiment on clay loam soil, rice yields under removal or incorporation of
Table XV
E Vect of Wheat Straw Management on Grain Yield (t ha �1) of Rice and Its Residual EVect on the
Grain Yield of the Following Wheat in Rice–Wheat Cropping System in India
Experimental
details Crop
Wheat straw management in rice
Straw
removed
Straw
burned
Straw
incorporated
Straw þgreen
manure Reference
Haryana, 3-year
study, clay loam
soil
Rice 6.97 7.23 7.01 a7.17 Agrawal et al.
(1995)
Wheat 4.65 4.84 4.43 4.52
Punjab, 12-year
study, loamy
sand soil
Rice 5.74 — 5.37 5.99 Yadvinder-
Singh
et al.
(2004a)
Wheat 4.41 — 4.32 4.44
Madhya Pradesh,
2-year study
Rice 2.21 — 2.82 — Pandey et al.
(1985)
Wheat 4.48 — 5.59 —
West Bengal, acid
silty clay loam
soil, 2-year
study, Wheat
straw
incorporated 10
days before rice
planting
Rice 3.74 — 4.17 — Sharma and
Mittra
(1992)
Wheat 1.80 — 2.00 —
Uttar Pradesh, clay
loam soil (pH
8.6), wheat straw
(10 t ha�1)
incorporated 30
days before rice
transplanting
Rice
(a) 100%
NPK
4.10 — 4.45 Rajput
(1995)
(b) 50%
NPK
— — 4.08
Wheat 2.29 — 2.72 —
a30 kg ha�1 extra fertilizer N.
354 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
wheat straw were similar (Agrawal et al., 1995). On a loamy sand soil,
incorporation of wheat straw reduced rice yield by 7% (average for 12
years) compared to when it was removed (Yadvinder-Singh et al., 2004a).
Incorporation of wheat straw into an acidic clay loam soil significantly
increased the grain yield of rice, with significant residual e Vect in the suc-
ceeding wheat crop (Sharma and Mitra, 1992). Similar observations were
also made by Pandey et al. (1985) and Rajput (1995). A beneficial e Vect of
wheat straw on the grain yield of rice even in the first year of study has been
reported by many workers (Alam and Azmi, 1989; Zia et al., 1992).
Table XVI
EVect of Time of Rice Straw and Fertilizer N (120 kg N ha�1) Management in Wheat and Its
Residual EVect on the Following Rice in Rice–Wheat Cropping System in Indiaa
Experiment 1:
Bijay-Singh et al. (2001)
Experiment 2:
Yadvinder-Singh
et al. (2004b)
Grain yield (t ha�1)15N
recovery
(%)
15N
losses
(%)
Grain yield (t ha�1)
Treatment Wheat Rice
Wheat
(1993–2000)
Rice
(1994–1999)
Straw removed 5.06a 4.90a 40.9a 31.7b 4.94a 6.19a
Straw burned 5.11a 5.13a 40.8a 31.3b 5.10a 6.25a
Straw incorporated
(40 DBSb)
4.89a 4.87a 36.1ab 36.6ab 5.17a 6.34a
Straw incorporated
(20 DBS)
5.00a 4.97a 34.4bc 34.0ab 5.22a 6.29a
Straw incorporated
(20 DBS) and
25% N applied at
incorporation
4.79a 5.02a 30.4c 45.2a 4.95a 6.33a
Straw incorporated
(10 DBS)
— — — — 4.97a 6.29a
aIn a column, figures followed by a common letter are not significantly different.bDBS, days before sowing of wheat.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 355
In a long-term experiment (1984–94) in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India
(Rattan et al., 1996), both rice and wheat had a higher yield with inorganic
fertilizers than any of the crop residue management treatment in the first
year. After 2 to 3 years, the combination of wheat straw and inorganic
fertilizers produced yields similar to those with inorganic fertilizers. It was
after 3 to 4 years that the combined use of inorganic fertilizers and wheat
straw started giving higher yields than inorganic fertilizer treatment.
Interestingly, green manuring in conjunction with wheat straw helped to
mitigate the adverse eVect of wheat straw in rice (Yadvinder-Singh et al.,
2004a). Similarly, Aulakh et al. (2001) reported that compared to application
of 120 kg N ha�1 through urea alone, rice production was greater with wheat
straw incorporation when an average of 86 kg N ha�1 of a prescribed 120 kg
N ha�1 dose was applied as green manure and the balance as urea N. Green
manure and incorporation of wheat straw in rice–wheat cropping systems has
the potential to increase soil organic matter while maintaining high yields.
In a field experiment conducted using 15N-labeled urea, grain yields of
wheat and the following rice were not adversely aVected by incorporation
of rice straw at least 20 days before sowing of wheat (Table XVI). In
another 7-year study, compared with residue removal or residue burning,
356 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
incorporation of rice residue 10 to 40 days before seeding wheat did not
show any adverse eVect on wheat yield (Table XVI). The application of 25%
of fertilizer N as starter N at the time of residue incorporation showed some
depression in wheat yield in all years compared with no starter N under
20-day incorporation treatment, although the diVerences were not significant.
It was suggested that N applied concurrently with straw incorporation gets
immobilized and does not remineralize easily. In this study, annual additions
of 40–50 kg N ha�1 through rice residue for 7 years did not influence grain
yield of wheat, as the recommended split application of 120 kg N ha�1 (one
half drilled at sowing and the remaining half top dressed at 21–25 days after
sowing) was already applied to all the treatments in wheat.
There also exist several other reports showing similar rice and wheat
yields under diVerent residual management practices (burning, removal, or
incorporation) (Singh et al., 1996; Walia et al., 1995). Kavinandan et al.
(1987) reported that incorporation of wheat straw 10 days before rice
transplanting and rice straw 3 weeks before wheat sowing gave 0.25 and
0.42 t ha�1 higher yields of rice and wheat, respectively, over incorporation
of wheat straw at 3 days before rice transplanting and rice straw at 2 weeks
before wheat sowing; the diVerences, however, were not significant.
In a field experiment in Faislabad (Pakistan), incorporation of rice straw
into the soil produced significantly higher yields of wheat (3.51 t ha�1)
compared to when rice straw was removed (2.91 t ha�1) (Salim, 1995).
Singh et al. (1996) reported that in Pantnagar (India), incorporation of rice
straw 3 weeks before wheat sowing significantly increased wheat yields on a
clay loam but not on a sandy loam soil. In the Himachal Pradesh state of
India, however, incorporation of rice straw at 30 days before wheat sowing
produced significantly lower wheat yields than removal or burning of straw
in the first 2 years, remained at par in the third year, and produced a
significantly higher yield and N uptake from the fourth crop onward
(Table XVII) (Verma and Bhagat, 1992). The causes of lower yields with
straw incorporation, particularly in the initial period of study, were immo-
bilization of N and slow decomposition of rice straw at low temperatures
during wheat growth. However, with the advancement of time (fourth crop
and onward), the previously added rice straw might have decomposed,
resulting in significantly higher wheat yield and N uptake under this treat-
ment. Straw mulch increased the wheat yield and N uptake significantly over
straw incorporation during the 2 years, which might be due to more favor-
able soil moisture regime, regulation of soil temperature, control of weeds,
and an increase in the microbiological activity. Yield and N uptake of
following rice under straw burn treatment did not vary significantly from
the straw removal during the entire study period. Straw mulch produced the
lower yield and N uptake of rice as compared to other straw management
treatments without N application during the first two rice crops but had a
Table XVII
EVect of Rice Straw Management on Grain Yield (t ha�1) of Wheat and Its Residual EVect on
Grain Yield of the Following Rice in Rice–Wheat Cropping System in India
Crop residue management
Experimental
details Crop
Straw
removed
Straw
burned
Straw
incorporated Reference
Himachal
Pradesh, data
averaged for 4
years, acidic
clay loam soil,
rice straw
chopped and
incorporated 4
weeks before
wheat sowing
Wheat 2.76 — 2.79 Sharma et al.
(1985, 1987)
Rice 2.37 — 2.47
Himachal
Pradesh, 5-
year study,
acidic clay
loam soil, rice
straw chopped
and
incorporated 4
weeks before
wheat sowing
Wheat
(1984–87)
2.6 2.6 2.2 Verma and
Bhagat
(1992)
Rice 3.7 3.6 3.7
Wheat
(1987–89)
2.4 2.4 2.4
Rice 3.8 3.7 4.0
Punjab, sandy
loam soil. Data
are reported
for the fourth
cropping cycle
Wheat — 4.88 5.18 V. Beri and B. S.
Sidhu (personal
communication)
Rice — 6.05 6.00
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 357
significant residual eVect from the third crop onward. Straw incorporation in
wheat increased rice yield by 38% in the third crop and 45% in the fourth
crop over straw removal.
Sharma et al. (1985, 1987) observed no significant eVect of straw incor-
poration on the grain yield of wheat and on the following rice (Table XVII).
Pathak and Sarkar (1997) observed that at recommended fertilizer N (120
kg ha�1), rice straw incorporation produced lower rice yields than straw
removal.
In a long-term field experiment in Ludhiana in northwestern India, Beri
et al. (1995) found that incorporation of rice and wheat residues into soil
resulted in significantly lower yields than removal or burning of residues
(Table XVIII). It was suggested that the depression in rice yield was not due
Table XVIII
EVect of Wheat Straw Incorporation in Rice and Rice Straw Incorporation in Wheat on Crop
Yields in Rice–Wheat Cropping System
Reference
and country
Type of
residue and
soil type
Duration
(years)
Residue
management
practice
Grain yield
(t ha�1)
Rice Wheat
Beri et al.
(1995),
India
Rice straw
in wheat and
wheat straw
in rice,
sandy loam
11 Removed 5.50a 4.14a
Burned 5.65a 4.26a
Incorporated 4.63b 3.97b
Brar et al.
(1998),
India
Rice straw
in wheat and
wheat straw
in rice,
loamy sand
3 Removed 3.19a 4.25a
Burned 3.66a 4.41a
Incorporated 3.40a 4.01a
Sarkar
(1997),
India
Rice straw
in wheat and
wheat straw
in rice,
sandy clay loam
2 Removed 4.68b 3.50b
Half residues
incorporated
5.75a 4.25a
Full residues
incorporated
4.80b 3.75b
Table XIX
EVect of Wheat Straw Incorporation in Rice and Rice Straw Incorporation in Wheat on Crop
Yields in Rice–Wheat Cropping System in India
Residue
management
Grain yield of
wheat (t ha�1)
Grain yield of
rice (t ha�1)
1993–94 1994–95 1995–96 1996–97 1994 1995 1996
Removed 4.28 3.80 3.93 4.30 7.02 6.20 7.28
Burned 4.37 4.28 3.44 4.47 7.05 6.10 7.23
Incorporated 3.58 3.65 3.75 4.92 7.66 6.74 7.67
LSD ( p ¼ 0.05) 0.56 ns 0.29 0.28 0.30 0.26 0.31
From Dhiman et al. (2000).
358 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
to N immobilization. Dhiman et al. (2000) reported that on a clay loam
soil, rice yields increased significantly with the incorporation of residues of
both rice and wheat as compared to burning or removal (Table XIX),
but wheat yields decreased with residue incorporation, particularly in the
initial 2 years of the study. In the fourth cropping season, wheat yield was
higher in the residue-incorporated treatment than residue burning or re-
moval treatments. The average productivity during the 4-year period was
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 359
11.5 t ha�1 year�1 when residues of both the crops were incorporated, and it
was higher by about 0.61 t ha�1 year�1 than from burning and removal of
residues. In a calcareous sandy loam soil in Bihar (India), Prasad and Sinha
(1995b) studied the eVect of incorporation of crop residues after chop-
ping (2 cm size), soaking in 2% urea solution, and then inoculating with
cellulytic culture (Aspergillus spp.) to hasten the decomposition. At recom-
mended fertilizer levels, incorporation of crop residues compared to removal
increased mean yields of wheat and rice by 7.2 and 8.5%, respectively.
Prasad et al. (1999) concluded that residues of both rice and wheat
can safely be incorporated without any detrimental eVects on the crops of
rice and wheat grown immediately after incorporation. Rice straw was in-
corporated 32–42 days before sowing of wheat, and wheat straw was
incorporated 65–76 days before rice planting. Wheat yields were slightly
reduced with rice straw incorporation in the first year of study (3.7 versus
4.1 t ha�1).
In microplot experiments with early rice-late rice–wheat rotation in
China, fertilizer utilization by rice was 82.6 and 47.7% on a sandy loam
soil and 75.5 and 51.8% on a light clay soil for rice straw (C:N ¼ 89:1) plus
N fertilizer and N fertilizer alone, respectively. The grain yield from the total
rotation was also higher under rice straw plus fertilizer N than under
fertilizer N alone treatment (Xu, 1984).
In a field experiment at Yanco (Australia), Bacon et al. (1989) observed
that increasing quantities of rice stubble retained on the soil surface
increased soil NO�3 –N concentrations by 46% and wheat on these plots
had a 37% increase in grain yield and 29% increase in N uptake. Bacon
and Cooper (1985) obtained higher yields from wheat direct-drilled into
undisturbed rice stubble plots over where stubble was incorporated at sow-
ing. The high yields were due to increased availability of both soil and
fertilizer N. Delayed stubble incorporation until wheat sowing caused great-
er yield depression due to N immobilization than when stubble was
incorporated early after rice harvest. It is also possible that the wide range
of phytotoxins released during stubble decomposition directly inhibited
plant growth.
2. Fertilizer Management in Straw-Amended Soils
Incorporation of cereal residues into the soil generally causes rapid
immobilization of soil and fertilizer N during the early stages of decomposi-
tion, resulting in N deficiency in the succeeding crop. Proper management
of fertilizer N may lead to reduced rates of N immobilization by crop
residues, thus increasing the eYciency of N usage. The improved fertilizer
management practices may include optimum method, time, and rate of
360 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
fertilizer N application, which may diVer from that when residues are
removed or burned. One obvious solution to the N immobilization problem
would be to place the fertilizer below the C-enriched surface soil layer for-
med due to surface placement of crop residues (Doran and Smith, 1987).
Yadvinder-Singh et al. (1994b) concluded that on soils amended with crop
residues, band placement of urea prills and deep placement of large urea
granules would lead to significantly lower amounts of fertilizer N immobili-
zation than mixed application of commercial urea granules. The limited
contact between fertilizer N and the decomposing microorganisms was
the main reason for the low rates of N immobilization with large urea
granules. The adverse eVect of N immobilization on crop growth can also
be avoided by applying additional fertilizer N or by delaying planting.
Another fertilizer management option may be to apply a part N fertilizer
at the time of straw incorporation to enhance decomposition of residues or
to allow suYcient time for the decomposition of crop residues before the
planting of next crop. Thakur and Pandya (1997) reported that precondi-
tioning urea with rice straw and soil in the ratio 1:3:1 (urea:straw:soil) was
significantly superior to urea alone in respect of grain yield and N uptake of
wheat.
a. Fertilizer N Rate. The target of eYcient nutrient management is to
maintain stable nutrient cycling in the long term while supplying suYcient
nutrients to crops in the short term. From a 3-year study on a rice–wheat
cropping system in Uttar Pradesh (India), Misra et al. (1996) reported that
total grain yields of rice and wheat increased due to the incorporation of
both the straws, with an extra dose of 20 kg N ha�1 applied at straw
incorporation over burning and straw incorporation without an extra
N dose. Singh and Sharma (2000) showed that application of 20 kg extra
fertilizer N as compared to recommended N levels of 120 kg N ha�1 to wheat
on straw removal plots gave a significantly higher grain yield and nutrient
uptake on straw-amended plots. In another study, the application of 30 kg
extra N ha�1 compared to the recommended fertilizer increased the rice yield
only slightly (Table XV) (Agrawal et al., 1995).
Sharma and Mitra (1992) found that incorporation of rice straw 15–20
days before wheat sowing decreased the grain yield, while incorporation
of wheat straw 15–20 days before transplanting increased rice yields. How-
ever, application of 15 kg N ha�1 as a starter dose with straw application
increased the yields of both rice and wheat crops. From a 2-year study, Brar
et al. (2000) reported that application of 40 kg N ha�1 at rice straw incor-
poration in addition to the recommended N fertilizer dose (120 kg ha�1) in
two equal splits at sowing and 3 weeks after sowing produced a significantly
higher wheat yield (4.94 versus 5.31 t ha�1) and N uptake (101 versus 116 kg
N ha�1) than application of recommended N fertilizer. Application of
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 361
irrigation at straw incorporation to enhance straw decomposition further
increased the wheat yield by 0.2 t ha�1 compared to no irrigation.
Narang et al. (1999) reported that wheat responded significantly to
the application of 160 kg N ha�1 during the first 2 years of straw incor-
poration (both rice and wheat) as compared to the recommended N rate of
120 kg N ha�1 when residues are removed. In the third year of the study, a
significant response to fertilizer N was observed up to 120 kg N ha�1 in
straw-amended wheat plots. Irrespective of the residue load, response of rice
to fertilizer N was also observed up to 160 kg N ha�1 in the first year of
study, but the grain yield increased significantly up to 120 kg N ha�1 in the
second year of study. Results from this study suggested the application of
25–30 kg ha�1 higher fertilizer N doses to rice in wheat on straw-amended
fields during initial 1–2 years after residue incorporation compared to the
rates recommended for straw removal fields. Later on, recommended ferti-
lizers may be needed to achieve higher yield productivity of rice–wheat
systems.
Singh and Sharma (2000) reported that incorporation of wheat residue
(40–50 days before rice transplanting) with no N or at low N rates resulted
in an adverse eVect on crop yields of rice and wheat. When adequate
N (180 kg N ha�1) was applied, residue incorporation increased produc-
tivity by 0.4–0.7 t ha�1 and nutrient uptake by 40–65 kg ha�1 over remo-
val or burning of residues. Residue incorporation increased eYciency of
applied fertilizer N in rice and had a significant residual eVect in following
wheat.
Thakur and Singh (1987) estimated optimum N rates of 115 and 140 kg
ha�1 for rice on fields without and with wheat straw (5 t ha�1) incorporation.
Thus, higher fertilizer N may be required for crops grown on soils amended
with crop residues to get maximum benefits. Jha et al. (1992) obtained the
highest grain yield of rice when rice straw and green manure (mungbean)
along with 60 kg N ha�1 was applied in three equal splits compared to rice
straw or green manure applied alone. Grain yield of following wheat was
also higher when rice straw and green manure were incorporated.
In a 2-year field experiment in Modipuram (northwestern India), incor-
poration of half of the crop residues along with recommended fertilizers
consistently produced higher yields of both rice and wheat than incorpora-
tion of full residues or removal of residues (Sarkar, 1997). The rice grain
yield with half residue was 5.80 t ha�1 and wheat yield was 4.38 t ha�1
compared to 4.70 t ha�1 of rice and 3.71 t ha�1 of wheat for no straw
treatment.
In a rice–wheat rotation on a calcareous soil, application of crop resi-
dues along with FYM gave the highest yield followed by FYM, crop
residues, and no amendment (Prasad and Sinha, 1995b). The grain yield
recorded with 50% NPK plus FYM plus crop residues was higher than that
362 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
with the 100% recommended dose of NPK alone, indicating that FYM
plus crop residues substituted 50% of NPK in each of wheat and rice
production.
Malik and Jaiswal (1993) reported that application of 58 kg N ha�1
as urea super granules plus 28 kg N ha�1 as wheat straw produced a
significantly higher rice yield than the recommended practice of applying
87 kg N ha�1 as commercial urea granules. The grain yield of the following
wheat was not aVected by the previous residue management practices in the
rice crop. Under dryland conditions in Uttar Pradesh (India), Singh and
Singh (1995) found that incorporating rice straw (10 t ha�1; C:N ¼ 75.5) 3
weeks before planting rice integrated with 50% of recommended NPK
fertilizers produced the highest rice yield and improved the profitability
of the system. Rajput (1995) found that incorporation of wheat straw
(10 t ha�1) resulted in up to 50% savings in the recommended NPK fertilizers
(60 kg N þ 13.1 kg P þ 25 kg K ha�1). A higher yield potential of rice was
achieved when wheat straw was applied along with recommended NPK
fertilizers (Table XV). The residual eVects of wheat straw on the following
wheat were also substantial. In another study (Kundu et al., 1994), how-
ever, wheat straw applied to rice had little eVect on the grain yield of the
succeeding wheat crop. In fact, several other long-term studies also showed
that it is not possible to substitute a part of fertilizer N requirement of rice
with N added through wheat straw (Table XX).
Katyal et al. (1998) reported results from long-term field experiments
conducted at five sites in India during 1983–1991. At Kanpur (U.P.,
India), 50% recommended NPK fertilizers plus 50% N through wheat straw
in rice followed by 100% recommended NPK fertilizers in wheat stabilized
the yields of rice and wheat. However, at the three other locations it was not
possible to substitute a part of fertilizer N (25% N) with crop residues
(Table XX). In West Bengal (India), the application of semi-decomposed
wheat straw (0.78%N, dry weight basis) at 3 t ha�1 along with 25 or 50% of
the recommended NPK fertilizers (80 kg N þ 26 kg P þ 33 kg K ha�1) 30
days before sowing of rainfed rice resulted in the highest yields. In a rice–
wheat cropping system, 5 t wheat straw ha�1 was incorporated 3–10 days
before rice transplanting and 5 t rice straw ha�1 was incorporated 2–3 weeks
before seeding wheat (Kavinandan et al., 1987). Most of the studies on rice
straw management were conducted at recommended N rates, and thus it is
diYcult to quantify the contribution of rice straw in supplying N to plants in
the cropping system due to the fact that the amount of N fertilizer applied
exceeds that for optimum yields.
b. Time and Method of Fertilizer Application. Sharma and Bali
(1998) showed that application of 30 kg N ha�1 at straw incorporation
and remaining 90 kg N ha�1 top dressed during wheat growth soil produced
Table XX
EVect of Wheat Straw and Fertilizer Management in Rice and Their Residual EVect on Wheat in Rice–Wheat Cropping System in India
Location Year/site
Crop Treatment
Reference
Rice 100% NPK
50% NPK þ50% N as WSa
75% NPK þ25% N as WS
LSD
( p ¼ 0.05)
Wheat 100% NPK 100% NPK 75% NPK
Uttar Pradesh (Faizabad) 1984–87
1987–93
Rice 3.9 3.5 3.3 0.28 Kumar and Yadav (1995)
Wheat 3.4 3.0 3.1 NS
Rice 4.5 4.3 4.4 NS
Wheat 3.4 3.4 3.1 0.29
Madhya Pradesh, 3-year study Jabalpur
Raipur
Rice 4.14 3.37 3.27 0.24 Dubey et al. (1997)
Wheat 2.94 2.75 2.57 0.13
Rice 4.65 4.20 4.19 0.18
Wheat 1.77 1.84 1.78 0.13
Punjab (Ludhiana) 8-year study Rice 6.37 5.25 5.97 — Katyal et al. (1998)
Wheat 4.55 4.33 3.93 —
Uttar Pradesh (Kanpur) 8-year study Rice 3.98 3.31 3.54 — Katyal et al. (1998)
Wheat 4.63 4.48 4.11 —
Madhya Pradesh (Jabalpur) 8-year study Rice 4.72 3.89 4.03 — Katyal et al. (1998)
Wheat 2.68 2.61 2.08 —
West Bengal (Kalyani) 8-year study Rice 3.50 3.48 3.45 — Katyal et al. (1998)
Wheat 2.65 3.06 2.55 —
aWS, wheat straw.
CR
OP
RE
SID
UE
MA
NA
GE
ME
NT
363
364 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
a significantly higher yield (2.0 versus 3.12 t ha�1) than that from applying
120 kg N ha�1 in two equal split doses (half drilled at sowing and half top
dressed at 1 month after sowing) on a silty clay loam. Incorporation of rice
straw reduced the wheat yield over straw removal at recommended N level
through its beneficial eVect on residue decomposition. In field experiments
using N-labeled urea, application of a part of the recommended N (25%) at
the time of straw incorporation (to hasten decomposition of straw) led to
large N losses and low wheat yield (Bijay-Singh et al., 2001). Recovery
of 15N by wheat was maximum (41.8%) when rice straw was removed or
burned and the minimum (30.4%) when 30 kg of 120 kg N ha�1 fertilizer was
applied along with straw incorporation at 20 days before wheat sowing
(Table XVI).
From long-term field experiments (1990–96) in three locations in India,
Yadav (1997) reported that when 20 kg N ha�1 was applied at the time of
incorporation and the remainder of the recommended N (100 kg or 120 kg
N ha�1 for rice and 120 kg N ha�1 for wheat) during the growth period,
grain yields of rice and wheat were significantly lower than those obtained
with other N scheduling practices included in the study. However, when an
extra 20 kg N ha�1 was applied at the time of residue incorporation over and
above the recommended N dose at one location (Jammu and Kashmir) or
when N levels were enhanced by 20 kg N ha�1 over the recommended rates
at the other site (Uttar Pradesh), the crop yields were the highest. On average
of six crop cycles, these practices produced an additional 150 and 510 kg
grain ha�1 at the first site and 570 and 810 kg grain ha�1 at the second site in
rice and wheat crops, respectively. Jiang et al. (1998) recommended the
application of 105 kg N ha�1 in three equal splits (sowing, tillering, and
stem elongation) on plots amended with wheat straw (3 t ha�1). Split
application of fertilizer N increased wheat yield by 43% compared to fertil-
izer N applied in single or two splits. Bacon and Cooper (1985) found that
application of N to wheat at tillering or stem elongation, compared to at
sowing, significantly increased soil mineral N content at least until anthesis.
Wheat on the stubble-incorporated plots did not respond significantly to
N application at sowing or stem elongation, while N application at any time
more than doubled wheat productivity on the stubble-retention plots. Delay-
ing N application until tillering significantly increased yields on stubble
incorporation, stubble retention and burned plus till plots. While only 70
kg N ha�1 was required for maximum yield at stem elongation, 140 kg
N ha�1 was necessary at sowing. It was concluded that stubble and fertilizer
management techniques could be manipulated in order to regulate soil
mineral N status, which in turn determined plant N uptake and yield of
wheat. In Kanto (Japan), with continuous application of rice and wheat
straw, rice yields were low during the initial 3–4 years, but the yield of rice
increased dramatically by continuous application of rice straw (Roppongi,
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 365
1987). The adverse eVects were alleviated when the basal application of
N was increased.
B. RICE–RICE CROPPING SYSTEM
1. Effect on Crop Yields
Rice–rice is a dominant cropping system in Bangladesh, China, Philippines,
Korea, Japan, Indonesia, and eastern and southern parts of India. Studies
with rice straw in rice–rice systems in a number of countries demonstrate
widely varying response to straw incorporation. In sharp contrast to rice–
wheat cropping systems, the majority of the studies on rice–rice cropping
systems show that incorporation of rice residues enhances rice yield and
N use eYciency. Ismunadji (1978) from Indonesia reported that incorpora-
tion of 10 t rice straw ha�1 increased grain yield of rice to 2.6 t ha�1 from
2.2 t ha�1 in the untreated control. Burning of rice straw produced a rice
yield almost similar to that obtained with its incorporation. Experiments in
the Philippines showed that straw incorporation for more than 6 years
increased the rice yield by 0.4 to 0.7 t ha�1 compared with fields that used
to receive chemical fertilizers and where rice straw was either removed or
burned (Table XXI) (Ponnamperuma, 1984). On the unfertilized plot, when
the soil was a P-deficient acid clay, the extra yield amounted to 23%
(Ponnamperuma, 1984). The beneficial eVects of rice straw incorporation
were, however, small during the initial 2–6 years of the study. Sharma et al.
(1989), however, observed no significant eVect of rice straw incorporation
(6 t ha�1) on grain yield of rice in a short-term study in the Philippines. In a
long-term study in Japan, Beaton et al. (1992) noted no beneficial eVects of
Table XXI
EVect of Long-Term Management of Rice Straw on Crop Yields (t ha�1) in Rice–Rice
Cropping System
Straw
treatment
Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Experiment 3
2–5
years
6–10
years Mean
2–6
years
7–10
years Mean
1966–
1980
1981–
1985
1986–
1989
Removed 9.7 7.1 8.3 9.0 7.3 8.2 7.53 8.03 7.74
Incorporated 9.9 7.7 8.7 9.3 8.0 8.7 7.54 8.17 8.44
Burned 9.9 7.1 8.3 — — — — — —
Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 from Ponnamperuma (1984); Experiment 3 from Beaton et al.
(1993).
366 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
incorporation of rice straw over straw removal in the initial 15 years of the
study (Table XXI), but in the final 4 years (20–23 years), an average increase
of 0.70 t ha�1 in rice grain yield was observed with rice straw incorporation
over removal.
The length of the period allowed for decomposition of crop residues
before the sowing/planting of the next crop aVects the agronomic res-
ponse to applied residues. Houng and Hwa (1975) found that when rice
straw was allowed to decompose for 4 or more weeks before sowing, there
was no adverse e Vect on germination of rice seeds. In many other studies,
crop residues were allowed to decompose for 2 or more weeks before
rice transplanting to avoid the adverse e Vects of phytotoxicity and
N immobilization on crop growth (Ali et al., 1995; Lanjewar et al., 1992;
Wu et al., 1997). Sharma and Mitra (1990) observed that rice yields were
increased significantly when rice straw was applied 30 days before trans-
planting, and rice straw also exhibited a favorable residual e Vect on the yield
of the second rice crop.
Witt et al. (2000) reported that early residue incorporation improved the
congruence between soil N supply and crop N demand by wet season rice,
especially during the vegetative stage of crop growth. This has resulted in
13–20% greater rice yields with early (60–63 days before transplanting)
compared to late (14–15 days prior to transplanting) residue incorporation
in rice–rice systems without applied N or with moderate rates of applied N.
From South Korea, Han et al. (1991) reported that the application of
7.5 t rice straw ha�1 along with the recommended dose of fertilizers pro-
duced a rice yield of 4.8 t ha�1, which was significantly higher than the
4.3 t ha�1 obtained with the application of recommended fertilizers alone.
Similarly, Sistani et al. (1998) from Malawi, Lee et al. (1995) from South
Korea, Beye (1977) from Senegal, Ali et al. (1995) from India, and Gotoh
et al. (1984) from Japan also observed beneficial e Vects of rice straw in-
corporation on rice yield. From a 6-year field experiment, Finassi (1976)
observed that incorporation of rice straw caused a significant increase in rice
yield at the highest rate of N (120 kg ha �1) application only.
In a field experiment over four cropping seasons in Andhra Pradesh
(India), Vamadevan et al. (1975) obtained the highest rice yield and
N uptake in all the seasons when the rice straw was incorporated into the
soil, but there was a small eVect at high levels of applied N (100 or 150 kg
N ha�1). Houng and Lin (1976) and Oh (1979) observed that incorporating
rice root residues into the soil increased rice yield on a poor soil rather than
on a fertile soil. In a pot study, incorporation of 10 t rice straw ha�1 into
0–6 cm soil layer without fertilizer increased rice grain yield by 21.2%, while
application of fertilizer N along with rice straw increased yield by 52.5%
(Rao, 1973). The residual eVect of rice straw in the following rice crop was
equal to 42% increase in grain yield. The beneficial eVect of rice straw
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 367
was explained by the increased biological N2 fixation by the free-living
microorganisms in the flooded soil amended with rice straw.
Adverse as well as no eVects of incorporation of crop residues into soil
on rice yield have also been documented. In poorly drained paddy fields,
incorporation of rice straw adversely aVects the rice growth due to the
presence of strong reducing conditions in the soil (Kuboto, 1984). On such
fields, it is recommended to incorporate the rice straw shortly after harvest.
Allowing decomposition of the straw over longer period alleviates the
injury occurring in the initial growth of the rice. In paddy fields with heavy
clay soils, rice yield decreased in the first and second year after straw
incorporation; however, after 3–4 years of continuous application, as the
amount of soil mineralized N increased and reduction in soil becomes less
pronounced, plant growth and the yield increased (Kuboto, 1984). Proper
water management, which includes drainage, is also important in such soils.
In a lysimeter experiment, Kondo et al. (1980) observed that rice straw
tended to decrease the rice yield in the presence of fertilizer N compared
with no straw. Corft et al. (1985), however, reported that 6 t rice straw ha�1
along with recommended N, P, K, and S fertilizers showed no eVect on rice
yield over N, P, K, and S fertilizers alone.
2. Integrated Management of Fertilizers and Crop Residues
Crop residues incorporated during fallow periods will cause immo-
bilization of soil N, but net N mineralization occurring during the
following cropping season would need to be accounted for when evalua-
ting N requirements of the following crop. To determine the amount
of N fertilizer that can be reduced with annual straw incorporation, a
N fertilizer response study was conducted by Eagle et al. (2001). As the
level of N fertilizer applied increased, grain yield increased when straw was
burned or incorporated. However, grain yields when straw was incorporated
continuously for 5 years were higher than when straw was burned. These
trials indicated that N fertilizer application can be decreased when straw is
incorporated, because no yield response was further observed when more
than 115 kg of N ha�1 was applied. It was recommended that N rates can be
decreased by at least 30 kg N ha�1 after 5 years of straw incorporation.
Clearly, an active, labile N pool was formed when straw was incorporated
that led to a reduction in fertilizer N dependency for rice.
In long-term experiments carried out at four locations in India, Hegde
(1996) observed that at three locations it was not possible to substitute a part
of N (25% of the recommended N) needs through rice straw without ad-
versely aVecting crop yields (Table XXII). In Kerala, located in deep South
of India, however, rice straw incorporation could substitute for 25% of
Table XXII
E Vect of Integrated Management of Inorganic Fertilizers and Rice Straw on Crop Yields (t ha�1)
in Rice–Rice Cropping System at Four DiVerent Locations in India
Treatment Rainy season rice Winter season rice
Rainy season Winter season Site 1a Site 2b Site 3c Site 4d Site 1a Site 2b Site 3c Site 4d
100% NPK 100% NPK 5.21 3.62 4.72 3.68 5.42 3.86 4.51 2.99
75% NPK 75% NPK 4.46 2.93 3.93 3.65 4.71 3.88 3.85 2.90
50% NPK 100% NPK 4.40 2.59 3.23 3.64 4.61 3.80 4.73 3.04
75% NPK þ25% N as RSe
100% NPK 5.03 3.21 4.07 3.66 5.00 3.47 4.00 2.88
50% NPK þ50% N as RS
100% NPK 4.73 2.96 3.53 3.68 5.05 3.84 4.79 2.99
LSD ( p ¼ 0.05) 0.19 0.04 0.18 0.16 0.21 0.05 0.20 0.12
aSite 1: Kharagpur (West Bengal), data averaged for 5 years, Udic Ustochrepts sandy clay loam
soil (pH 5.4).bSite 2: Bhubneswar (Orissa), data averaged for 10 years, Haplustalts sandy loam soil (pH 5.9).cSite 3: Maruteru (Andhra Pradesh), data averaged for 4 years, Chromustrets clayey soil
(pH 7.0).dSite 4: Karemane (Kerala), data averaged for 8 years, Typic Tropfluvent sandy loam soil
(pH 5.2).eRS, rice straw.
From Hegde (1996).
368 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
fertilizer N needs of kharif rice. The relatively high temperatures during both
kharif and winter seasons in Kerala might have helped for quick decomposi-
tion of rice straw. At low-fertility levels (50% N, P, K), application of rice
straw significantly increased the grain yield of rainy season rice over no
straw treatment at all the four sites. Raju et al. (1987) and Elankumaran
and Thengamuthu (1986) also concluded that it is not possible to substitute a
part of N through rice straw due to its high C:N ratio, which causes
immobilization of soil and fertilizer N. In a field trial in eastern India,
Bhattacharyya et al. (1996) recorded N substitution of up to 50% of the
recommended fertilizers from the incorporation of 5 t rice straw ha �1 in an
acidic red soil. Russo (1974) reported that incorporating 3–6 t chopped rice
straw ha�1 with 65 kg N plus 28 kg P ha�1 produced a slightly higher rice
yield than that obtained with the application of 120 kg N plus 43.1 kg P plus
110 kg K ha �1. Kamalan et al. (1989) obtained 0.3 t ha�1 of additional rice
yield with the application of urea super granules (USG) combined with rice
straw over USG alone. In another study in Malawi, Sistani et al. (1998)
observed that on rice straw-amended plots, application of urea in briquette
form compared with prilled urea significantly increased rice grain yield in
two of the three experiments.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 369
Raju and Reddy (2000) conducted a 6-year study on a clay loam soil to
investigate the eVect of rice residue management on crop yields in rice–rice
system. Rice straw equivalent to supply 25 and 50% fertilizer N requirement
of the rainy season crop was incorporated before rice transplanting, and
the residual eVect of rice straw was studied in the succeeding winter rice.
The incorporation of rice straw along with recommended fertilizers proved
superior to inorganic fertilizers alone in increasing rice yield, soil organic
matter, and available K contents in soil. This study showed that it is possible
to reduce the total fertilizer needs of both rainy and winter season rice by
25% without any adverse eVect on system productivity. The N balance was
negative in all the treatments, but the P balance was positive. The K balance
was positive when 50% of the fertilizer N was applied as rice straw.
In a greenhouse experiment, Shen et al. (1993) obtained a higher rice grain
yield by adding 10 g wheat straw plus 350 mg urea N kg�1 soil, but the 10 g
straw plus 150 mg urea N treatment registered higher fertilizer use eYciency. It
was suggested that an adequate N supply to rice plants could be maintained by
applying suYcient N fertilizer with straw to have a C:N ratio equal to 20.
Huang and Lu (1996) observed no adverse eVect of rice straw on plant growth
and total 15N recoverywhen rice straw was incorporated alongwith (NH4)2SO4
at a C:N ratio of <25:1. The application of rice straw helped alleviate the
adverse eVects of excessive N rates and thus increased the rice growth and
yield response to high N rates. Patel et al. (1997) found that preconditioning
of urea with rice straw plus soil in the ratio of 1:3:1 was significantly superior
to urea alone with respect to grain yield and N uptake of rice.
In Maharashtra state of India, Bulbule et al. (1996) observed that man-
agement practices consisting of basal incorporation of rice straw (2 t ha�1)
integrated with deep placement of urea briquette (2.1 g per four hills) at
transplanting using a modified 20 � 20 cm spacing produced significantly
higher grain yield (average increase of 1.3 t ha�1) of rainfed transplanted rice
than did the rice straw incorporation integrated with two equal splits of
prilled urea at the same N rate. The additional yields obtained with deep
placement of urea briquettes were possibly due to reduction in immobiliza-
tion of fertilizer N over top dressing of prilled urea. Similarly, Elankumaran
and Thandamuthu (1986) reported that USG combined with rice straw
produced about 10% higher rice grain than USG alone at the same rate of
N application in south Indian state of Kerala.
Pandey and Tripathi (1992) reported that application of 33% of recom-
mended fertilizer N (87 kg ha�1) through rice straw plus 66% as prilled urea
produced a rice yield of 4.7 t ha�1, which was higher than that obtained with
the application of prilled urea in three equal splits (4.0 t ha�1). In South
India, Ramaswami (1979) observed that incorporation of 10 t rice straw
ha�1 along with 39 kg P ha�1 produced a rice yield that was similar to that
obtained with the application of 180 kg N plus 39 kg P plus 75 kg K ha�1.
370 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
The straw application increased biological N2 fixation and P availability in
soil. Rutu and Widjaja (1994) reported that application of crop residues
increased N and P use eYciency from <20 in control to 40 kg grain kg�1
N and from 30 kg in control to 60 kg grain kg�1 P. Similarly, Sudjadi et al.
(1989) observed a twofold increase in N use eYciency in rice after 4 years of
incorporation of rice straw in Indonesia. In another field experiment in
Indonesia, incorporation of 3 t rice straw ha�1 increased grain yields of 13
rice cultivars by up to 1.3 t ha�1 and significantly increased the K content of
shoot compared with untreated control (Ismunadji et al., 1973). It was
suggested that rice straw could be incorporated into soil as a substitute for
K fertilizer. Kwak et al. (1990) reported that rice straw application increased
rice yield in the no-P plots.
Becker et al. (1994a) reported that co-incorporation of green manure and
straw from previous rice depressed yield and N use eYciency in the second
rice dry season when yield potential is high. A residual eVect equivalent to
10% increase in grain yield however, was, observed in the third rice crop.
Synchronizing soil N supply with N demand by incorporating residues with
suitable chemical fertilizers may not immediately increase rice grain yield but
will improve long-term soil fertility.
In pot and laboratory studies using 15N-labeled rice straw and15N-labeled (NH4)2SO4, Hwang et al. (1993) found that 17.5 to 23.5% of
straw N was mineralized during rice growth, of which 30–50% was subse-
quently absorbed by rice plants. Rice straw inhibited plant growth in its
early stages, but application of fertilizer N with rice straw stimulated its
decomposition, thereby increasing the mineralization of straw N and
subsequent recovery by rice plants and reducing levels of residual N in
soils. He et al. (1994) measured N recovery by rice grain from rice straw
N incorporated in the field from 9.8 to 14.5%. At IRRI, Philippines, Broad-
bent and Reyes (1972) obtained a high recovery of fertilizer N (>72%) by
rice in two soils even when chopped rice straw was incorporated under
greenhouse conditions. In a pot study in Japan, Shiota et al. (1984) found
that recoveries of fertilizer 15N and rice straw compost N were 58–61% and
13–15%, respectively. Total N uptake at harvest was the highest when rice
straw compost was applied along with fertilizer. Li et al. (1981) from China
reported that rice straw incorpotaton increased N uptake by rice compared
to straw removal.
In Bangladesh, continuous cropping with rice–rice–rice has led to destruc-
tion of soil clay through the process known as ferrolysis This is the major
degradation process in the fine-textured soils, which may be one of the causes
of yield decline/stagnation of rice, including organic matter depletion (Farid
et al., 1998). Rice straw incorporation after each rice harvest continuously for
12 years resulted in average yield of 10.99 t ha�1 (for three rice crops in a year)
compared with 6.48 t ha�1 in the traditional practice of growing rice. The
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 371
sustainability of rice yields was also achieved with straw incorporation, as rice
grain yields declined from 7.15 t ha�1 in 1984–85 to 6.15 t ha�1 in 1994–95
under the farmers’ practice, but grain yields increased from 9.50 t ha�1 in
1984–85 to 12.20 t ha�1 in 1994–95 under straw incorporation treatment. The
yield increase and sustainability in the straw-incorporated treatment was
ascribed to improvement in the physical and chemical properties of soil
and the release of several plant nutrients such as K, S, and micronutrients
from the decomposing straw, thereby increasing soil fertility. On average, 12
t ha�1 of rice straw were incorporated each year, which recycled 70 kg N, 12
kg P, and 166 kg K ha�1. The nutrient balance for N, P, and K was positive
in straw-incorporated plots, but large negative nutrient balances were
recorded when rice residues were removed from the fields.
C. RICE–LEGUME CROPPING SYSTEM
Green gram (Vigna radiata), black gram (Vigna mungo), cowpea
(V. unguicuata), soybean (Glycine max), and groundnut (Arachis hypogae)
are the important summer food legumes that fit into the rice-based multiple
cropping systems; they leave substantial amount of residues. Legume resi-
dues provide biological fixed N to the next crop in addition to the benefits
oVered by non-legume crops. Food legumes are capable of fixing large
amounts of N, but removal of seed or green pods can constitute an export
of considerable N. Accumulation of N by legumes in tropical rice-based
cropping systems is influenced by water regimes, inoculation, soil fertility,
nutrient supply, and soil and crop management (Buresh and De Datta, 1991;
Yadvinder-Singh et al., 1994a).
The quantity of N in above-ground residues remaining after grain harvest
ranges from 17 kg to 101 kg N ha�1, and N fertilizer equivalent ranges from
37 to 100 kg N ha�1, with a mean value of 40–45 kg N ha�1 (Buresh and De
Datta, 1991). In addition to above-ground residues, roots of food legumes
contain up to 40 kg N ha�1 at final harvest, which is progressively released
during crop growth. This may explain in part the reported considerable
benefits of legumes to a subsequent rice crop despite a modest return of
N in residues (Kulkarni and Pandey, 1988) or even when all the above-
ground residues had been removed prior to cultivation (De et al., 1983).
Residues of grain legumes after harvesting pods have a lower N content than
those of green manure but rapidly release N in tropical flooded soils. The
potential benefits of legume residues and legume green manures in rice other
than fixed N are described by Buresh and De Datta (1991) and Yadvinder-
Singh et al. (1991). Studies with 15N-labeled legume residues indicate that
N recovered by subsequent rice ranges from 25 to 45% of the N originally
contained within the legume residues (Yadvinder-Singh et al., 1991).
372 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
In a rice–wheat-mungbean system, Rekhi and Meelu (1983) incorporated
straw of mungbean grown after wheat just before rice planting and observed
an increase in rice yield equal to the application of 60 kg fertilizer N ha�1.
Similar results were also obtained by Bhandari et al. (1992). Incorporation
of legume residues after harvesting grains exhibited high agronomic
eYciency and apparent N recovery compared to cowpea used as green
manure under both lowland and upland conditions in Philippines (John
et al., 1989). Prasad and Palaniappan (1987) reported than incorporation
of mungbean and soybean residues along with recommended fertilizers
produced the highest rice yield. In a 2-year field experiment on lentil-rice
crop rotation, Prasad et al. (1990) found that incorporation of lentil residues
(2.7 to 5.6 t ha�1) in rice exhibited no additional benefit over lentil root
biomass. Incorporation of lentil residues, however, resulted in recycling of
about 50–60% of the total N, P, and K removed by the lentil crop.
Sangakkau (1987) reported that rice yields after ploughing residues of
mungbean or Phaseolus vulgaris were 3.2 and 3.4 t ha�1, respectively, as
compared to the 3.0 t ha�1 after fallow. In that study, no residual eVect from
residue incorporation was detected in the second rice crop. In the
rice-soybean cropping system, Adisarwanto et al. (1996) reported that appli-
cation of rice straw increased soybean yield by 103% at two sites in Indone-
sia. In upland rice-soybean rotation, Ismunadji (1978) recorded soybean
yields of 410, 450, and 810 kg ha�1 under untreated control, 20 t rice straw
ha�1 incorporated, and 20 t rice straw ha�1 applied as mulch treatments,
respectively. In that study on upland rice-soybean cropping system on
orthoxic tropudult soil high in A1 and low in K, response to K application
was obtained when crop residues were removed at harvest. Recycling of crop
residues dramatically improved the yields at low rates of K application and
reduced the crop response to K application. In a greenhouse study with a
rice-lentil cropping system, Tamak et al. (1993) observed that incorporation
of rice straw increased lentil yields by 34% over control. In field trials on
groundnut-rice, groundnut-maize-rice, and maize-soybean-rice in Peru, Loli
and Chuguizuta (1993) reported that incorporation of legume residues in
rice significantly increased rice yields, while incorporation of maize residue
inhibited germination and reduced rice yields.
D. OTHER RICE-BASED CROPPING SYSTEMS
Sugar beet produces large quantities of crop residues. In most cases,
residues from sugar beet resulted in higher yields of the following crop
(Watanabe, 1989). In a rice-sugar beet cropping sequence in Punjab (India),
incorporation of sugar beet tops containing 90 kg N ha�1 increased rice
grain yield by 52% over untreated control. Rice yield increased significantly
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 373
up to 120 kg N ha �1 without and up to 80 kg N ha�1 with sugar beet tops
(Kapur and Kanwar, 1994). The estimated urea N equivalent of sugar beet
tops was 37 kg N ha�1 in rice and 19 kg N ha�1 in the following crop of
sugar beet. The apparent recovery of N from sugar beet tops by rice was
20–32% at di Verent levels of N application.
In rice-potato-sesame and rice-potato-mung bean cropping sequences,
incorporation of crop residues along with 75% of the recommended N, P,
and K fertilizers consistently increased the productivity of constituent crops
in the two sequences (Jayaram et al., 1990). In a 2-year field experiment on a
red yellow podzolic soil on a rice-maize-cowpea sequence in Indonesia, crop
residues supplied a significant amount of N to the following rice crop (Sisworo
et al., 1990). As expected, cereal residues were of lower value as a source of
N than were legume residues. In a rice-potato-groundnut rotation, Sanyal
et al. (1993) recorded similar yields of rice with 100% recommended NPK
fertilizer applied alone and incorporation of crop residue along with 75% of
recommended NPK fertilizers. Crop residue incorporation increased nutrient
uptake by 14%. Suyamto (1993) observed that in a rice-maize cropping
system, the application of 5 t rice straw ha �1 significantly increased the rice
yield by 26% over control. The beneficial e Vect of rice straw on crop yield was
equivalent to 73 kg K ha �1. The e Vect of rice straw mulch on maize, however,
was not significant. In a 3-year field experiment on rice-mustard rotation on a
deep clayey soil, application of rice straw mulch in mustard conserved more
water in the profile during the early stages of growth and resulted in low soil
mechanical resistance, leading to better root growth. Rice straw mulch signif-
icantly reduced the grain yield of mustard and chickpea in rice-mustard and
rice-chickpea rotations (Rathore et al., 1998). Cotton stalks after picking are
normally uprooted and used as fuel. In a rice-cotton-rice cropping system in
Tamil Nadu (South India), incorporating 22.6 t cotton sticks ha�1 (adding
270 kg N ha�1) on a clay loam soil significantly increased the rice yield by
22.2% over no stick incorporation (Budhar and Palaniappan, 1999). These
data suggest that cotton residues can be incorporated in the following rice for
higher yields and fertilizer N dose can be reduced.
XII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The intelligent management and utilization of crop residues is essential
for the improvement of soil quality and crop productivity under rice-based
cropping systems of the tropics. Crop residues, usually considered a prob-
lem, when managed correctly can improve soil organic matter dynamics and
nutrient cycling, thereby creating a rather favorable environment for plant
growth. Crop residues contain large quantities of nutrients, and thus the
374 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
return of crop residues to the soil can save a considerable quantity of
fertilizers. The most viable option is to retain residue in the field; burning
should be avoided. The major issue is adapting drills to sow into loose
residues. Strategies include chopping and spreading of straw during or
after combining or the use of disc-type trash drills.
The important conditions that influence crop residue decomposition
under field conditions are temperature, moisture, aeration, and N applica-
tion. Several other factors, such as residue quality, tillage, and soil proper-
ties, also aVect microbial decomposition of crop residues. Residues rich in
lignin and polyphenol contents experience the lowest decay. Decomposition
of crop residues occurs at a rapid rate (about 80% of crop residue C is lost in
the first year) under the warm and humid conditions of the tropics. Expo-
nential models have often described the process of C decomposition carried
out by soil microorganisms, and these have suggested the existence of at least
two carbon fractions—labile and resistant.
Factors that control C decomposition also aVect the N mineralization
from crop residues. Decomposition of poor-quality residues with low
N contents, high C:N ratios, and high lignin and polyphenol contents
generally results in microbial immobilization of soil and fertilizer N. The
period of N immobilization varied from 4 to 8 weeks depending on temper-
ature and mineral N content of the soil. The N immobilization potential of
cereal residues is very high (26–35 mg N g�1 added C) and is often higher
than available mineral N content in soils. Net rates of N mineralization will
occur when plant residues with C:N ratios <40 are incorporated. C:N ratios
have been criticized because they are species specific and are influenced by
soil N supply (site specific). Most of the studies on N mineralization–
immobilization have been carried out under laboratory conditions, and it
is not precisely known to what extent these can be extrapolated to field
conditions. The extent of N immobilization is less in anaerobic than
aerobic conditions. Nutrient immobilization caused by the addition of resi-
dues will last only a few years before the system adjusts to a new equilibrium,
and the rate of mineralization of nutrients in the whole system is increased.
The qualitative controls (factors) on the amounts and timing of N release
from crop residues are known, but quantification of mineralization–
immobilization over both a short- and long-term basis and understanding
of the relationship with diVerent types of residues, inputs, and management
are not adequate. Little is known about the eVect of tillage on mineralization
of N from crop residues and mechanisms controlling mineralization in
rice-based cropping systems under tropical conditions.
Application of crop residues with a high C:N ratio often leads to adverse
impacts on available N in soil and growth of crops planted immediately after
straw incorporation. A large number of organic compounds, particularly
phenolic acid and acetic acid, are released during the decomposition of crop
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 375
residues under anaerobic conditions. The accumulation of these organic
compounds can adversely aVect the seedling growth. The accumulation of
organic acids in residue-treated soils occurred during the initial 15–20 days
of the decomposition period. The accumulation of organic acids is likely to
be greater in soils with low percolation rates. The serious decrease in soil
available N content can be oVset by proper application of N fertilizer in
combination with rice straw, and the toxic eVects of organic acids and some
reducing substances resulting from decomposition of rice straw may be
alleviated or eliminated by allowing the rice or wheat straw to decompose
for some time (2–4 weeks) before planting the next crop.
Crop residue management may aVect N cycling and N use eYciency of
crops in several ways. Rice has been found to recover up to 25% of the rice
straw N. Although the total amount of N contributed by straw from a single
application will be relatively small, the long-term eVects should be substan-
tial. The eVect of crop residues on N losses by leaching and denitrification,
and on the availability of fertilizer N, particularly under surface placement
of residues, is not conclusive and needs further investigation under field
conditions. Both the positive and the negative eVects of residues on fertilizer
use eYciency have been reported. Incorporation of crop residues markedly
increases the activities of urease and many other enzymes in soil. Large NH3
volatilization losses from urea applications to soils amended with crop
residues both under flooded and upland conditions have been reported.
The application of crop residues can cause short-term immobilization of
both P and S, particularly in aerobic soils. Only a small fraction (5%) of the
residue P is available to the plants in the first year, and a major fraction is
immobilized as microbial biomass. The availability of P in the soil and
uptake by rice increased with straw incorporation in flooded soils. Crop
residue incorporation generally increased the P adsorption and P sorption
maxima in soils but markedly reduced the aYnity coeYcient or rate of
adsorption. Incorporation of crop residues in rice increased the eYciency
of P in rock phosphates. Crop residues contain large amounts of K, which
upon incorporation increased K availability in soil and helped to reduce
K depletion from nonexchangeable K fraction of soil.
Long-term application of crop residues increased the organic matter, total
N content, and availability of several nutrients (though to a small extent) in
soils. The rate of increase in soil organic matter is low due to high turnover
rates of C under tropical conditions. The increase in soil organic matter
levels due to crop residue recycling was determined by the duration of the
study, amount and quality of residue, soil type, climatic conditions, and
cropping system followed. Crop residues influence the chemical and
biological properties of the soil. In many situations, residue retention may
reduce nutrient availability, and additional fertilizer applications may be
required to attain yields equal to those previously achieved.
376 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Crop residues exerted a favorable, though highly variable, influence on
diVerent soil physical parameters. Residue management alters soil proper-
ties, mainly by causing a gradual increase in soil organic matter content. The
eVects of residues on soil physical properties were dependent on soil type,
tillage, soil moisture conditions, duration of study, and cropping system
followed. The beneficial eVects of crop residues on soil physical properties
are likely to be greater under the rice–wheat than under the rice–rice crop-
ping system.
Crop residues caused marked increases in microbial populations and
microbial biomass in soils. The addition of crop residues to flooded soils
enhanced biological N fixation by phototrophic and heterotrophic bacteria.
The estimate of biological N fixation showed that 15–25 kg ha�1 more N may
be fixed per season by amending the soils with crop residues under field
conditions. The values of biological N fixation under upland conditions are
lower than under flooded conditions.
The many reports of investigations into crop residue management and
yield showed that results have been variable—no eVect, yield increase,
or yield decline. Yield decline associated with stubble retention may be due
to three main factors: short-term nitrogen immobilization, fungal diseases,
and phytotoxicity. The degree of stubble decomposition at the time of
planting has a great bearing on the likelihood of problems for the crop.
Furthermore, some of these problems are likely to decrease over time. In
cases in which rice yield increases occurred with stubble retention, these
increases took at least 3–5 years to be expressed.
In the rice–wheat cropping system, rice is likely to be more benefited than
wheat. The rice straw recycling in wheat will have small or even negative
eVects on wheat yields over the short term (1–3 years). These negative eVects
can, however, be eVectively mitigated by co-incorporation of cereal residues
and leguminous green manures. Long-term recycling of crop residues can have
substantial beneficial eVects, and high crop yields could be obtained from the
combined use of inorganic fertilizers and crop residues. The eVects of crop
residue recycling on growth and yields of crops are influenced by residue load,
time allowed for decomposition, temperature and moisture conditions during
decomposition and crop growth, nutrient supply, and soil type. The crop
residues are likely to have greater eVects on yields of crops grown in fine-
textured than in coarse-textured soils. The beneficial eVect of a starter dose
on crop yields in straw-amended soils has been reported in a few studies, and it
needs further evaluation. The time of fertilizer N application is important in
enhancing the yields of crops on residue-treated soils.A few studies showed that
a dose of fertilizer N higher than recommended for untreated soils may be
needed in the initial 1–2 years for straw-amendedfields. Information from long-
term studies indicated that it may not be possible to replace a part of fertilizer
N by wheat straw in the rice crop.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 377
Under the rice–rice system, the yield advantage due to rice straw incor-
poration over straw burning or removal ranges from 0.2 to 0.7 t ha�1 per
season, and it increases with time and soil fertility buildup. Higher rice yield
responses to straw incorporation were obtained on acidic and sodic soils
than on normal soils. The length of the decomposition period for crop
residues before planting of the next crop influenced the agronomic response
to applied residues. In most of the studies carried out in India, it was not
possible to substitute a part of fertilizer N requirement through rice straw. In
addition to N, increased P use eYciency has been observed in some studies
conducted on straw-amended soils. As compared to non-legume residues,
legume residues showed greater potential in meeting the fertilizer N
requirement of the succeeding crop. The results from experiments on the
agronomic value of crop residues are variable because of a number of factors
involved, including residue quality, management factors, and edaphic
factors, and their complex interactions with various management factors
in determining the ultimate crop yield. This suggests that one residue
management system in unlikely to be suited to all situations.
As emphasis is placed on environmentally sound practices, the envi-
ronmental consequences of crop residue recycling in rice-based cropping
systems need more attention. In submerged soils, crop residues may encour-
age emission of CH4, and techniques may be developed to minimize CH4
production. On the other hand, the increase in soil organic matter levels with
crop residue incorporation will be useful in sequestering C so as to reduce
CO2 levels in the atmosphere.
The application of current knowledge on residue management will help
reduce the adverse eVects of crop residues on crop yields. It may be con-
cluded that nutrient cycling through crop residues holds great promise in
securing not only a high level of crop productivity but also improved soil
health. Greater knowledge in this area should improve our ability to manage
soil nutrients eYciently.
XIII. RESEARCH NEEDS
Regions with plummeting numbers of draft animals due to increasing
farm mechanization will simultaneously increase the straw available for
incorporation and create new straw disposal issues in continuous rice sys-
tems. The introduction of new farming implements will allow more diverse
options for straw incorporation. New issues will thus call for a new genera-
tion of studies to optimize straw management. Because economic constraints
often clash with agronomic objectives in straw management, future studies
should focus on strategies that are economically feasible for local farmers.
378 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
These studies should also integrate eVects of straw management on nutrient
cycling with the precise formulation of mineral fertilizer applications so that
farmers can attain desired yield targets and minimize costs while reducing
environmental degradation through excessive fertilizer application. The
participation of farmers at the research, development, and implementation
stages is of paramount importance because of the wide range of rice-based
cropping systems that must be considered and biophysical variations. Al-
though a great deal of information is available from temperate regions,
much needs to be done in tropical climates where rice is the major crop.
Some research needs are the following:
1. In order to interpret soil organic matter dynamics and nutrient cycling,
more reliable data on yields of both above- and below-ground crop
residues are needed. Evaluation of crops in terms of residue production,
decomposition, and nutrient retention with the objective of improving
organic inputs to soil is needed.
2. At present, proper technology for in situ incorporation of crop residues is
not available. Development of better technology for in situ incorporation
and rapid decomposition of crop residues by appropriate tillage, irriga-
tion, fertilizer management, and inoculation of suitable microorganisms,
particularly for intensive rice-based cropping systems commonly fol-
lowed in Asia is a need of the time.
3. Better characterization of crop residues for their chemical composition
(macro- and micronutrients, organic compounds) that will help in im-
proved prediction of release of C, N, S, and other nutrients is needed.
A database on residue qualities should be prepared.
4. More information needs to be collected on the eVects of management
(including residue quality, application rate and method, timing, inter-
actions with inorganic fertilizers, temperature, soil moisture, soil type,
and tillage) on decomposition and nutrient release rates and production
of phytotoxic compounds from crop residues. Better quantification of
mineralization–immobilization would help improve fertilizer N manage-
ment and minimize losses of N to the environment. Available informa-
tion is restricted to a limited number of situations, mainly for temperate
regions. Data based on decomposition and N mineralization rates will
be useful for model development and validation.
5. Several plant quality parameters and indices have been proposed for
predicting decomposition and N release. There is a need to identify
some robust plant indices that provide improved prediction of nutrient
release and soil organic matter formation. These indices, coupled
with decomposition models, should be able to assess crop residues for
decomposition, nutrient release, and soil organic matter formation. The
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 379
measurement of a few quality parameters then can replace the need for
detailed decomposition studies for each plant material in each location.
6. More research on N cycling and fate of nutrients added through crop
residues needs to be carried out in rice-based cropping systems. Detailed
experiments are required to measure gross and net mineralization–
immobilization in residue-amended soils for representative sites across
a range of rice-based cropping systems, climates, and soils. There is a
need to extrapolate short-term incubation results to field situations.
7. Evaluation of crop residue eVects on the interaction between inorganic,
organic, and microbial forms of P and S in the soil and subsequent P and
S availability is needed. Future studies should also focus on the miner-
alization and transformations of micronutrients contained in crop resi-
dues.
8. Encouragement of the use of multidisciplinary approaches to problems
associated with residue management is needed.
9. The fate of nutrients in residue-amended fields should be investigated.
10. Investigation of nutrient cycling within residue management and re-
duced tillage practices to provide a better understanding of changes in
nutrient availability to plants and SOM dynamics is needed. Such
studies will help further increase our understanding of how soil manage-
ment influences the quality and quantity of various organic matter pools
important in the cycling and release of nutrients or the quantification of
ecosystem C budget.
11. More research is needed on whether diVerent crop residues have diVer-
ent eVects on SOM quality. Specifically, contributions from crop straw
and crop roots to SOM formation could all be distinguished from each
other, and rice materials should be distinguished from wheat materials
in rice–wheat systems. These materials vary considerably in their lignin
content, which might have some significance to the phenol accumulation
reported by Olk et al. (1996).
12. Many of the changes in soil properties and nutrient cycling may become
apparent only after several years (10 years or more) of residue manage-
ment, and the long-term results may diVer from those obtained over
short-term. Therefore, there is a strong need to establish long-term
experiments at sites carefully selected for variations in temperature,
moisture regimes, soil mineralogy, and agricultural management cover-
ing diVerent rice-based cropping systems in tropical countries.
13. Direct and indirect eVects of crop residue incorporation on soil quality
and crop productivity in rice–rice and rice-upland crop systems should
be investigated.
14. Because of a number of variables and complexities of interactions
among soils, crops, and climate, an accurate prediction of the eVect of
crop residue management practices on nutrient cycling, crop growth and
380 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
yield, and soil properties will be possible only through the development
of realistic process-based computer simulation models. Research pro-
blems related to residue management should be carried out with consid-
eration of potential modeling uses of data. Collection of additional data
needed for model validation and exploration of alternate modeling
scenarios could then help in understanding research results. Several
models are available to simulate the impact of management practices
on soil organic matter and crop yield, but most of them have not been
evaluated and tested for tropical regions.
15. Investigation of largely unexplained benefits that arise from crop
residue recycling, such as microbiological, biological N2 fixation, pest
suppression, physical, etc., is needed.
16. Estimates of the relative costs of diVerent options must be developed, as
the most attractive choices might have significant impacts on environ-
mental quality through their eVect on microbial processes that deter-
mine the magnitude of C storage in the soil, methane emission into the
atmosphere, and long-term soil fertility.
Addressing these research needs will provide information to properly
integrate crop residues with inorganic fertilizers. The most critical output
in this regard will be the ability to accurately adjust the rate and timing of
fertilizer addition in line with crop residue management for diVerent crops,
soil types and agroclimatic situations.
REFERENCES
Abdul-Wahid, A., Shamshad, A., Iftikhar, A., and Ejaz, A. (1998). Amelioration of saline sodic
soils with organic matter and their use for wheat growth. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 29,
2307–2318.
Adachi, K., Watanabe, I., Kobayashi, M., and Takahashi, E. (1989). EVect of application of
glucose, cellulose, and rice straw on nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction and soil-nitrogen
components) in anaerobic soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 35, 235–243.
Adiningsih, S. J. (1984). Pengarub beberapa factor tarhadap penyediaan Kaluim tanah Sawah
daarah Sukabumica dam Bogor. Ph.D. Thesis, IPB, Bogor.
Adisarwanto, T., Utomo, W. H., Kirchhof, G., and So, H. B. (1996). Composition of food
legume crops to diVerent soil management practices after rainfed lowland rice East Jawa.
In ‘‘Proc. Management of Clay Soils for Rainfed Lowland Rice-Based Cropping Systems’’,
pp. 142–147. ACIAR Int. Workshop, Quizon City, Philippines.
Agrawal, R. P., Phogat, V. K., Chand, T., and Grewal, M. S. (1995). Improvements of soil
physical conditions in Haryana. In ‘‘Research Highlights’’, pp. 69–75. Dept. of Soil Science,
CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
Ajwa, H. A., and Tabatabai, M. A. (1994). Decomposition of diVerent organic materials in soils.
Bull. Fert. Soils 18, 175–182.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 381
Alam, S. M., and Azmi, A. R. (1989). Influence of wild plant and crop residues on growth and
nutrient content of wheat. Pakistan J. Scientific Indust. Res. 32, 749–751.
Alberto, M. C. R., Neue, H. U., Capati, A., Castro, R. U., Bernardo, I. M., Aduna, J., and
Lantin, R. S. (1996). EVect of diVerent straw management practices on soil fertility,
rice yields and the environment. In ‘‘Proc. Int. Symp. on Maximising Sustainable Rice
Yields Through Improved Soil and Environmental Management’’ (T. Attanandana, I.
Kheonruenomne, P. Pongsakui, and T. Vearaslip, Eds.), Vol. 1, pp. 197–206. Khon
Kaen, Thailand.
Ali, A., Medhi, D. N., Dekamedhi, B., and Baroova, R. (1995). EVect of rice straw in combina-
tion with diVerent levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and potash on transplanted rice. J. Agril.
Sci. Soc. North East India 8, 248–250.
Amarasiri, S. L., and Wickramasinghe, K. (1988). Nitrogen and potassium supplied to flooded
rice by recycling rice straw. Trop. Agriculturist 144, 21–34.
Amato, M., Ladd, J. N., Ellington, A., Ford, G., Mahoney, J. E., Taylor, A. C., and Walsgott, D.
(1987). Decomposition of plant material in Australian soils. IV. Decomposition in situ of14C- and 15N-labelled legume and wheat materials in a range of southern Australian soils.
Aust. J. Soil Res. 25, 95–105.
Anderson, J. M., and Swift, M. J. (1983). Decomposition in tropical forests. In ‘‘Tropical Rain
Forest: Ecology and Management’’ (S. L. Sutton, T. C. Whitmore, and A. C. Chadwick,
Eds.), pp. 287–309. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Wallingford, London.
Andren, O., and Paustin, K. (1987). Transformation of 14C-labelled plant components in
soil in relation to immobilization and remineralization of 15N fertilizer. Plant Soil 86,
15–25.
Angers, A., and Recous, S. (1997). Decomposition of wheat and rye residue as aVected by
particle size. Plant Soil 189, 197–203.
Angers, D. A., Samson, N., and Legere, A. (1993). Early changes in water stable aggrega-
tion induced by rotation and tillage in soil under barley production. Can. J. Soil Sci. 73,
51–59.
Asakawa, S., Akagawa-Matsushita, M., Koga, Y., and Hayano, K. (1998). Communities of
methanogenic bacteria in paddy field soils with long-term application of organic matter.
Soil Biol. Biochem. 30, 299–303.
Asakawa, S., and Hayano, K. (1995). Populations of methanogenic bacteria in paddy field soil
under double cropping conditions (rice-wheat). Biol. Fertil. Soils 20, 113–117.
Atta, S. K., Mohammed, S. A., van Cleemput, O., and Zayed, A. (1996). Transformations of
iron and manganese under controlled Eh, Eh-pH conditions and additions of organic
matter. Soil Technol. 9, 223–237.
Aulakh, M. S., Doran, J. W., and Mosier, A. R. (1992). Soil denitrification—significance,
measurement, and eVect of management. Adv. Soil Sci. 18, 1–57.
Aulakh, M. S., Doran, J. W., Walters, J., and Power, J. F. (1991). Legume residue and soil
water eVects on denitrification in soils of diVerent textures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23,
1161–1167.
Aulakh, M. S., Khera, T. S., Doran, J. W., and Bronson, K. F. (2001). Denitrification, N2O and
CO2 fluxes in rice-wheat cropping system as aVected by crop residues, fertilizer N and
legume green manure. Biol. Fertil. Soils 34, 375–389.
Azmal, A. K. M., Marumoto, T., Shindo, H., and Nishiyama, M. (1996). Mineralization and
changes in microbial biomass in water-saturated soil amended with some tropical plant
residues. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 42, 483–492.
Azmal, A. K. M., Marumoto, T., Shindo, H., and Nishiyama, M. (1997). Changes in microbial
biomass after continuous application of azolla and rice straw in soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.
43, 811–818.
382 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Bacon, P. E., and Cooper, J. L. (1985). EVect of rice stubble and nitrogen fertilizer management
techniques on yield of wheat sown after rice. Field Crops Res. 10, 241–250.
Bacon, P. E., Hoult, E. H., McGarity, J. W., and Alter, D. (1989). Crop growth and nitrogen
transformations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) planted after wetland rice (Oryza sativa
L.). Biol. Fertil. Soils 7, 263–268.
Bacon, P. E., McGarity, J. W., Hoult, E. H., and Alter, D. (1986). Soil mineral nitrogen
concentration within cycles of flood irrigation: EVect of rice stubble and fertilizer manage-
ment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 18, 173–178.
Bakken, L. R. (1986). Microbial growth, assimilation and mineralization of carbon and nitrogen
during decomposition barley straw. Sci. Rep. Agric. Univ. Norway 14, 1–14.
Bangar, S. G., and Patil, P. L. (1980). EVect of C:N ratio and phosphatic fertilizer on decom-
position of wheat straw. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 28, 543–546.
Barnard, G., and Kristoferson, L. (1985). ‘‘Agricultural Residues as Fuel in the Third World’’.
Technical Report No. 4. International Institute for Environment and Development.
Earthscan, London.
Barreto, H. J., and Westerman, R. L. (1989). Soil urease activity in winter wheat residue
management system. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 1455–1458.
Beare, M. H., Cookson, W. R., and Wilson, P. E. (1996). EVects of straw residue management
practices on the composition and activity of soil microbial communities and patterns
of residue decomposition. In ‘‘Proceedings of the ASSS and NZSSS National Soils
Conference’’, pp. 11–12. Melbourne, Australia.
Beaton, J. D., Hasegawa, M., Jiung-Chang, X., Keng, J. C. W., and Halstead, E. H. (1992).
Influence of intensive long-term fertilization on properties of paddy soils and sustainable
yields. In ‘‘Proceedings of International Symposium on Paddy Soils’’, pp. 246–251.
Nanjing, China.
Becker, M., Ladha, J. K., and Ottow, J. C. G. (1994a). Nitrogen losses and lowland rice yield as
aVected by residue nitrogen release. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 1660–1665.
Becker, M., Ladha, J. K., Simpson, I. C., and Ottow, J. C. G. (1994b). Parameters aVecting
residue nitrogen mineralization in flooded soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 1666–1671.
Bellakki, M. A., Badanur, V. P., and Setty, R. A. (1998). EVect of long-term integrated nutrient
management on some important properties of a Vertisol. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 46,
176–180.
Bending, G. D., Turner, M. K., and Burns, I. G. (1998). Fate of nitrogen from crop residues as
aVected by biochemical quality and the microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30,
2055–2065.
Beri, V., and Sidhu, B. S. (1996). Management of crop residues for better envionment.
In ‘‘Agriculture and Environment’’ (B. D. Kansal, G. S. Dhaliwal, and M. S. Bajwa, Eds.),
pp. 179–198. National Agriculture Technology Information Centre, Ludhiana, India.
Beri, V., Sidhu, B. S., Bahl, G. S., and Bhat, A. K. (1995). Nitrogen and phosphorus transfor-
mations as aVected by crop residue management practices and their influence on crop yield.
Soil Use Management 11, 51–54.
Beri, V., Sidhu, B. S., Bhat, A. K., and Bhupinder Pal-Singh (1992). Nutrient balance and soil
properties as aVected by management of crop residues. In ‘‘Proc. Int. Symp. Nutrient
Management for Sustained Productivity’’ (M. S. Bajwa et al., Eds.), Vol. II, pp. 133–135.
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Berton, R. S., and Pratt, P. F. (1997). Evaluation of phosphorus requirement by the sorption
isotherm technique in soils amended with organic materials. Revista Brasil. Ciencia. Solo
21, 197–206.
Beye, G. (1977). Study of the eVects of applied nitrogen and ploughed-in rice straw on rice
development in Lower Casamance (Senegal). Agronomie Tropicale 32, 41–50.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 383
Beye, G., Toure, M., and Arial, G. (1978). EVect of incorporating straw on the physico-chemical
properties of paddy soils of Lower Casamance and on the development of rice. Agronomie
Tropicale 33, 381–389.
Bhagat, R. M., Bhardwaj, A. K., and Sharma, P. K. (2003). Long-term eVect of residue
management on soil physical properties, water use and yield of rice in north-western
India. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 51, 111–117.
Bhagat, R. M., Bhuiyan, S. I., and Moody, K. (1999). Water, tillage and weed management
options for wet seeded rice in the Philippines. Soil Till. Res. 52, 51–58.
Bhandari, A. L., Sood, A., Sharma, K. N., and Rana, D. S. (1992). Integrated nutrient
management in a rice-wheat system. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 40, 742–747.
Bhat, A. K. (1991). Existence of organic acids on incorporation of crop residues to the soil. Adv.
Plant Sci. 4, 329–336.
Bhat, A. K., and Beri, V. (2002). Methanogenesis in rice soil: EVect of temperature, pH,
fertilizers and organics. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 50, 306–308.
Bhardwaj, K. K. R. (1995). Recycling of crop residues, oil cakes and other plant production
agriculture. In ‘‘Recycling of Crop, Animal, Human and Industrial Wastes in Agriculture’’
(H. L. S. Tandon, Ed.), pp. 9–30. Fertiliser Development and Consultation Organisation,
New Delhi, India.
Bhardwaj, K. K. R., and Gaur, A. C. (1985). ‘‘Recycling of Organic Wastes’’. Indian Council of
Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Bhattacharyya, H. C., Saud, R. K., and Saikia, L. (1996). Partial substitution of inorganic
nitrogen through organics in Kharif rice. In ‘‘Proceedings of the Seminar on Problems and
Prospects of Agricultural Research and Development in North-East India’’, pp. 119–123.
Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, India.
Bhowmik, P. C., and Doll, J. D. (1982). Corn and soybean response to allelopathic eVects of
weed and crop residue. Agron. J. 74, 601–606.
Bhushan, L., and Sharma, P. K. (2002). Long term eVects of lantana (Lantana spp. L.) residue
additions on soil physical properties under rice-wheat cropping. I. Soil consistency, surface
crusting and clod formation. Soil Till. Res. 65, 157–167.
Biederbeck, V. O., Campbell, C. A., and Zetner, R. P. (1984). EVect of crop rotation and
fertilization on some biological properties of a loam in South Western Saskatchewan.
Can. J. Soil Sci. 64, 355–367.
Bijay-Singh, Bronson, K. F., Yadvinder-Singh, Khera, T. S., and Pasuquin, E. (2001). Nitrogen-
15 balance as aVected by rice residue management in a rice-wheat rotation in northwest
India. Nut. Cycl. Agroeco. 59, 227–237.
Bijay-Singh, Yadvinder-Singh, Imas, P., and Xie, J. C. (2003). Potassium nutrition of the rice-
wheat cropping system. Adv. Agron. 81, 203–259.
Bijay-Singh, Yadvinder-Singh, Sadana, U. S., and Meelu, O. P. (1992). EVect of organic
amendments and moisture regimes on the kinetics of micronutrients in a calcareous
sandy loam soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 40, 114–118.
Bird, J. A., Howarth, W. R., Eagle, A. J., and Van Kessel, C. (2001). Immobilization of
fertilizer nitrogen in rice: EVects of straw management practice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65,
1143–1152.
Bird, J. A., van Kassel, C., and Howarth, W. R. (2002). Nitrogen dynamics in humic fractions
under alternate straw management in temperate rice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 478–488.
Biswas, D. R., and Narayanasamy, G. (2002). Mobilization of phosphorus from rockphosphate
through composting using crop residues. Fert. News 47(3), 53–56.
Black, A. L., and Reitz, L. L. (1972). Phosphorus and nitrate-nitrogen immobilization by wheat
straw. Agron. J. 64, 782–785.
Blake, R. O. (1992). Sustainable and increased food production. Agric. Syst. 40, 7–19.
384 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Bossio, D. A., Horwath, W. R., Mutters, R. G., and van Kessel, C. (1999). Methane pool and
flux dynamics in a rice field following straw incorporation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31,
1313–1322.
Boyle, M., Frankenberger, W. T., Jr., and Stolzy, L. H. (1989). The influence of organic matter
on soil aggregation and water infiltration. J. Prod. Agri. 2, 290–299.
Brar, S. S., Kumar, S., Brar, L. S., Walia, S. S., and Kumar, S. (1998). EVect of crop residue
management systems on the grain yield and eYcacy of herbicides in rice-wheat sequence.
Indian J. Weed Sci. 30, 39–43.
Brar, S. S., Kumar, S., and Narang, R. S. (2000). EVect of moisture regime and nitrogen on
decomposition of combine harvested rice (Oryza sativa) residue and performance of suc-
ceeding wheat (Triticum aestivum) in rice-wheat system in Punjab. Indian J. Agron. 45,
458–462.
Breland, T. A. (1994). Enhanced mineralisation and denitrification as a result of heterogenous
distribution of clover residues in soil. Plant Soil 166, 1–12.
Bremer, E., and Van Kessel, C. (1992). Plant available nitrogen from lentil and wheat residues
during a subsequent growing season. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 1155–1160.
Bremner, J. M. (1997). Sources of nitrous oxide in soils. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosys. 49, 7–16.
Broadbent, F. E., and Nakashima, T. (1965). Plant recovery of immobilized nitrogen in
greenhouse experiments. Soil Sci. Am. Proc. 29, 55–60.
Broadbent, F. E., and Reyes, O. C. (1972). Uptake of soil and fertilizer N by rice in some
Philippine soils. Soil Sci. 112, 200–205.
Bronson, K. F., and Mosier, A. R. (1993). Nitrous oxide emissions and methane consumption in
wheat and corn-cropped systems innortheasternColorado. In ‘‘AgriculturalEcosystemEVects
on Trace Gases and Global Climate Change. ASA Spec. Publ. No. 55’’ (L. A. Harper et al.,
Eds.), pp. 133–144. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.
Bronson, K. F., Neue, H.-U., Singh, U., and Abao, E. B., Jr. (1997a). Automated chamber
measurements of methane and nitrous oxide flux in a flooded soil: I. Residue, nitrogen and
water management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 81–987.
Bronson, K. F., Singh, U., Neue, H.-U., and Abao, E. B., Jr. (1997b). Automated chamber
measurements of methane and nitrous oxide flux in a flooded soil: II. Fallow period
emissions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 988–993.
Budhar, M. N., and Palaniappan, S. (1999). EVect of incorporation of preceeding cotton
(Gossypium species), on succeeding rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J. Agron. 39, 461–463.
Bulbule, A. V., Talashilkar, S. C., and Savant, N. K. (1996). Integrated rice straw-urea
management for transplanted rice. J. Agril. Sci. 127, 49–55.
Buresh, R. J., and De Datta, S. K. (1991). Nitrogen dynamics and management of rice-legume
cropping systems. Adv. Agron. 45, 1–59.
Buresh, R. J., Chua, T. T., Castillo, E. G., Liboon, S. P., and Garrity, D. P. (1993). Fallow and
Sesbania eVects on soil nitrogen dynamics in lowland rice-based cropping systems. Agron.
J. 85, 316–321.
Buyanovsky, G. A., and Wagner, G. H. (1997). Crop residue input to soil organic matter on
Sanborn field. In ‘‘Soil Organic in Temperate Agroecosystem: Long-Term Experiments in
North America’’ (E. A. Paul, K. Paustin, E. T. Elliot, and C. V. Cole, Eds.), pp. 73–83.
CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Cai, Z. C., Xing, G. X., Shen, G. Y., Xu, H., Yan, X. Y., Tsuruta, H., Yagi, K., and Minami, K.
(1999). Measurements of CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddies in Fengqiu, China. Soil
Sci. Plant Nutr. 45, 1–13.
Cai, Z. C., Xing, G. X., Yan, X., Xu, H., Tsuruta, H., Yagi, K., and Minami, K. (1997).
Methane and nitrous oxide emission from rice paddy fields as aVected by nitrogen fertilizers
and water management. Plant Soil 196, 7–14.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 385
Cannell, R. Q., and Lynch, J. M. (1984). Possible adverse eVects of decomposing crop residues
on plant growth. In ‘‘Organic matter and Rice’’, pp. 455–475. International Rice Research
Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Phillippines.
Caramona, G., Christianson, C. B., and Byrnes, B. H. (1990). Temperature and low concentra-
tion eVects of the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (nBTPT) on
ammonia volatilization from urea. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 933–937.
Cassman, K. G., De Datta, S. K., Olk, D. C., Alcantara, J., Gamson, M., Descalsota, J., and
Dizon, M. (1995). Yield decline and the nitrogen economy of long-term experiments on
continuous, irrigated rice systems in the tropics. In ‘‘Soil Management: Experimental Basis
for Sustainability and Environmental Quality’’ (R. Lal and B. A. Stewart, Eds.),
pp. 181–222. CRC/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
Cassman, K. G., and Pingali, P. L. (1995). Intensification of irrigated rice systems learning from
the past to meet future challenges. Geo. J. 35, 299–305.
Cassman,K.G.,Peng,S., andDobermann,A. (1997).Nutritionalphysiologyof the riceplantsand
productivitydeclineof irrigated rice systems in the tropics.SoilSci.PlantNutr.43, 1101–1106.
Chandrasekaran, S., and Yoshida, T. (1973). EVect of organic acid transformations in
submerged soils on growth of rice plant. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 19, 39–45.
Charyulu, P. B. B. N., and Rao, V. R. (1981). Influence of carbon substrates and moisture
regime on nitrogen fixation in paddy soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13, 39–42.
Chatterjee, B. N., and Mondal, S. S. (1996). Potassium nutrition under intensive cropping.
J. Pot. Res. 12, 358–364.
Chatterjee, B. N., Singh, K. I., Pal, I., and Maiti, S. (1979). Organic manures as substitutes for
chemical fertilizers for high yielding rice varieties. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 44, 188–192.
Chaudhary, T. N., and Ghildyal, B. P. (1969). Aggregate stability of puddled soil during rice
growth. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 17, 261.
Chen, Z., Li, D., Shao, K., and Wang, B. (1993). Features of CH4 emission from rice paddy
fields in Beijing and Nanjing. Chemosphere 26, 239–245.
Cheng, L., and Wen, Q. X. (1998). EVect of land use pattern on mineralization of residual C and
N from plant materials decomposing under field conditions. Pedosphere 8, 311–316.
Cheng, Y. S. (1984). EVects of drainage on the characteristics of paddy soils in china.
In ‘‘Organic Matter and Rice’’, pp. 417–430. International Rice Research Institute, Los
Banos, Philippines.
Cheshire, M. V., and Chapman, S. J. (1996). Influence of the N and P status of plant material
and of added N and P on the mineralization from 14C-labelled ryegrass in soil. Biol. Fertil.
Soils 21, 166–170.
Chidthaisong, A., Inubushi, K., Muramatsu, Y., and Watanabe, I. (1996). Production potential
and emission of methane in flooded rice soil microcosms after continuous application of
straws. Microbes Environ. 11, 73–78.
Cho, D. Y., and Ponnamperuma, F. N. (1971). Influence of soil temperature on the chemical
kinetics of flooded soils and the growth of rice. Soil Sci. 112, 184–194.
Choi, W. K., and Rossi, N. (1978). EVect of organic residues on sulphur content in soil.
Agrochimica 22, 18–24.
Christensen, B. T. (1986). Barley straw decomposition under field conditions: EVect of place-
ment and initial nitrogen content on weight loss and nitrogen dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem.
18, 523–529.
Chung, I. M. (2001). Identification of allelopathic compounds from rice (Oryza sativa L.) straw
and their biological activity. Can. J. Plant Sci. 81, 815–819.
Clay, D. E., Clapp, C. E., Molina, J. A. E., and Dowdy, R. H. (1990). Influence of nitrogen
fertilization, tillage, and residue management on a soil nitrogen mineralisation index.
Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 21, 323–335.
386 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Clement, A., Ladha, J. K., and Chalifour, F. P. (1995). Crop residue eVects on nitrogen
mineralization, microbial biomass, and rice yield in submerged soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
59, 1595–1603.
Cogle, A. L., Strong, W. M., SaYgna, P. G., Ladd, J. N., and Amato, M. (1987). Wheat straw
decomposition in subtropical Australia. II. EVect of straw placement on decomposition and
recovery of added 15N-urea. Aust. J. Soil Res. 25, 481–490.
Compilatory Committee (1990). In ‘‘Chinese Agricultural Yearbook’’ pp. 36–50. Agricultue
Publishers, Beijing, China.
Condron, L. M., Tiessen, H., Trasar-Cepada, C., Moir, J. O., and Stewart, J. W. B. (1993).
EVects of liming on organic matter decomposition and phosphorous extractability in an
acid humid Ranker soil from northwest Spain. Biol. Fertil. Soils 15, 279–284.
Connor, D. J., Timsina, J., and Humphreys, E. (2003). Prospectous of permanents beds in rice-
wheat cropping systems. In ‘‘Improving the Productivity and Sustainability of Rice-Wheat
Systems: Issues and Impact.ASA, Spec. Pub 65’’ (J. K. Ladha, J. E.Hill, J. M. Duxbury, R. K.
Gupta, and R. J. Buresh, Eds.), pp. 197–210. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Constantinides, M., and Fownes, J. H. (1994). Nitrogen mineralisation from leaves and litter of
tropical plants: Relationships to nitrogen, lignin and soluble polyphenols concentration.
Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 49–55.
Cookson, W. R., Beare, M. H., and Wilson, P. E. (1998). EVects of prior crop residue
management on microbial properties and crop residue decomposition. Appl. Soil Ecol. 7,
179–188.
Corft, R., Le, Mufran, K., Buntan, A., and Corpuz, I. T. (1985). Yield response of IR 32 to
inorganic and organic fertilizers. Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 10(6), 31–32.
Craswell, E. T. (1978). Some factors influencing denitrification and nitrogen immobilization in a
clay soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 241–245.
Dalal, R. C., and Bridge, B. J. (1996). Aggregation and organic matter storage in subhumid and
semi-arid Soils. In ‘‘Structure and Organic Matter Storage in Agricultural Soils’’ (M. R.
Carter and B. A. Stewart, Eds.), pp. 263–307. Adv. Soil Sci., CRC Lewis Publishers, Boca
Raton, FL.
Datta, B., Patruno, A., and Cauazza, L. (1989). Ploughing in straw to concentrate nitrate over
14 years. I. Influence on the structural stability of the soil. Agrochimica 33, 1–2.
De Haan, S. (1977). Humus, its formation, its relation with the mineral part of the soil and its
significance for soil productivity. In ‘‘Soil Organic Matter Studies’’, Vol. I, pp. 21–30.
IAEA/FAO, Vienna.
De, R., Rao, V. Y., and Ali, W. (1983). Grain and fodder legumes as preceding crops aVecting
the yields and N economy of rice. J. Agri. Sci. 101, 463–466.
Debnath, M., and Sinha, N. B. (1993). EVect of diVerent C:N ratios and microbial culture
inoculations on decomposition of rice straw. Environ. Ecol. 11, 1–6.
Delwiche, C. C., and Cicerone, R. J. (1993). Factors aVecting methane production under rice.
Global Biochem. Cycles 7, 143–155.
Devevre, O. C., and Howrath, W. R. (2000). Decomposition of rice straw and microbial carbon
use eYciency under diVerent soil temperatures and moistures. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 32,
1773–1785.
Dexter, A. R., Bein, D., and Hewitt, J. S. (1982). Macro structure of the surface layer of a self-
mulching clay in relation to cereal stubble management. Soil Tillage Res. 2, 251–264.
Dhiman, S. D., Nandal, D. P., and Om, H. (2000). Productivity of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat
(Triticum aestivum) cropping system as aVected by its residue management and fertility
levels. Indian J. Agron. 45, 1–5.
Dhoot, J. S., Singh, N. T., and Brar, S. S. (1974). Polysaccharides in relation to soil aggregation
under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 22, 217–219.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 387
Dikshit, P. R., Singh, M., and Sharma, D. (1976). EVect of soil amendments on uptake and
distribution of soil-applied 65Zn in flooded rice. Pantnagar J. Res. 1, 36–39.
Dobermann, A., and Witt, C. (2000). The potential impact of crop intensification on carbon
and nitrogen cycling in intensive rice systems. In ‘‘Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in
Flooded Soils. Proceedings of the Workshop on Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in
Flooded Soils’’ (G. J. D. Kirk and D. C. Olk, Eds.), pp. 1–25. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los
Banos, Philippines.
Doel, D. S., Honeycutt, C. W., and Halteman, W. A. (1990). Soil water eVects on the use of heat
units to predict crop residue carbon and nitrogen mineralization. Biol. Fertil. Soils 10,
102–106.
Doran, J. W., and Smith, M. S. (1987). Organic matter management and utilization of soil and
fertility nutrients. In ‘‘Soil Ferttility and Organic Matter as Critical Components of
Production Systems. ASA Spec. Pub. 19’’ (R. F. Follet et al., Eds.), pp. 51–70. ASA,
SSSA, and CSSA, Madison, WI.
Doran, J. W. (1980). Soil microbial and biochemical changes associated with reduced tillage.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 765–771.
Douglas, C. L., and Rickman, R. W. (1992). Estimating crop residue decomposition from air
temperature, initial nitrogen content and residue placement. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56,
272–278.
Dubey, S. K., Sharma, R. S., and Vishwakarma, S. K. (1997). Integrated nutrient management
for sustainable productivity of important cropping systems in Madhya Pradesh. Indian
J. Agron. 42, 13–17.
Eagle, A. J., Bird, J. A., Hill, J. E., Howarth, W. R., and Van Kessel, C. (2001). Nitrogen
dynamics and fertilizer use eYciency in rice following straw incorporation and winter
flooding. Agron. J. 93, 1346–1354.
Elankumaran, S., and Thangamuthu, G. S. (1986). Integrated organic and inorganic nitrogen
fertilizer in lowland rice. Int. Rice Res. Newsl 11(5), 40.
Elliott, L. F., and Lynch, J. M. (1984). The eVect of available carbon and nitrogen in straw on
soil and ash aggregation and acetic acid production. Plant Soil 78, 335–343.
Elliott, L. F., Cochran, V. L., and Popendick, R. I. (1981). Wheat residue and N placement
eVects on wheat growth in the greenhouse. Soil Sci. 131, 48–52.
Elliott, L. F., McCalla, T. M., and Weiss, A. (1978). Phytotoxicity associated with residue
management. In ‘‘Crop Residue Management Systems’’ (W. R. Oschwald, Ed.),
pp. 131–146. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.
El Samanoudy, I. M., Askar, F. A., and El-Shakweer, M. H. A. (1993). Suitability of natural soil
conditioners for improving hydrophysical and chemical properties of alkaline clayey soil.
Egyptian J. Soil Sci. 33, 35–45.
Farid, A. T. M., Miah, M. A. M., and Karim, Z. (1998). Innovative residue management in a
typical rice soil of Bangladesh. Thai. J. Agril. Sci. 31, 360–368.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1999). ‘‘Yearbook of Fertilizers’’. Food and Agri-
culture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Finassi, A. (1976). Incorporation of rice straw. Riso 25, 9–18.
Firestone, M. K. (1982). Biological denitrification. In ‘‘Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils. Agrono-
my Monograph No. 22’’ (F. J. Stevenson, Ed.), pp. 289–326. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison,
WI.
Flinn, J. C., and Marciano, V. P. (1984). Rice straw and stubble management. In ‘‘Organic Matter
and Rice’’, pp. 593–611. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines.
Fox, R. H., Myers, R. J. K., and Vallis, I. (1990). The nitrogen mineralization rate of legume
residues in soil as influenced by their polyphenol, lignin and N contents. Plant Soil 129,
251–259.
388 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Fu, M. H., Xu, X. C., and Tabatabai, M. A. (1987). EVect of pH on nitrogen mineralization in
crop residue-treated soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 5, 115–119.
Fujii, K., Kobayashi, M., and Takahashi, E. (1972). Changes in the soil microflora and in their
metabolic activity. 4. Changes during the decomposition of plant residues. J. Sci. Soil
Manure Jap. 43, 155–159.
Fujii, K., Kobayashi, M., Takahashi, E., Suzuki, T., Matsuguchi, T., Araragi, M., and Tanabe, I.
(1970). Changes in the soil microflora and in its metabolic activity. 2. Changes during the
decomposition of rice straw added to soil. J. Sci. Soil Manure Jap. 41, 323–327.
Gajri, P. R., Gill, K. S., Singh, R., and Gill, B. S. (1999). EVect of pre-planting tillage on crop
yields and weed biomass in a rice-wheat system on a sandy loam soil in Punjab. Soil Till.
Res. 52, 83–89.
Gangaiah, B., Prasad, R., and Prasad, R. (1999). EVect of wheat residue management practices
and fertilizers on productivity, nutrient removal and soil fertility of rice-wheat sequence.
J. Soils Crops 6, 10–13.
Gaur, A. C., and Pareek, R. P. (1974). Organic acids in soil during degradation of organic
residues. Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad. B 40, 68–76.
Gestel, M., van Merckx, R., and Vlassak, K. (1993). Soil drying and rewetting and the turnover
of 14C-labelled plant residues: First order decay rates of biomass and non-biomass 14C. Soil
Biol. Biochem. 25, 125–134.
Ghidey, F., Gregory, J. M., McCarty, T. R., and Alberts, E. E. (1985). Residue decay evaluation
and prediction. Trans. Am. Soc. Agricult. Engin. 28, 102–105.
Gialhe, H., Din, A. E., and Scherier, A. (1976). The influence of straw, particularly rice straw, in
combination with calcium cyanamide on microbiological activity of two Portugese soils.
Zant. Bacter. Parast. Infek. Hygn. II 131, 405–418.
Gill, D. W., and Sri Adiningsih, J. (1986). Response of upland rice and soyabeans to potassium
fertilization, residue management and green manuring in Sitiung, West Sumatra. Pember-
itaan Penelitian Tanah dan Pupuk Indonesia 6, 26–32.
Gill, J. S., Bijay-Singh, Khind, C. S., and Yadvinder-Singh (1998a). EYciency of N-(n-butyl)
thiophosphoric triamide in retarding hydrolysis of urea and ammonia volatilization losses
in a flooded sandy loam soil amended with organic materials. Nut. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 53,
203–207.
Gill, J. S., Khind, C. S., Bijay-Singh, and Yadvinder-Singh (1998b). Ammonia volatilization
under flooded conditions as aVected by urease activity of soils amended with crop residues
on long-term basis. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 46, 448–450.
Gilmour, J. T., Clark, M. D., and Sigua, G. C. (1985). Estimating net N mineralization from
carbon dioxide evolution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49, 1398–1402.
Gilmour, J. T., Mauromoustakos, A., Gale, P. M., and Norman, R. J. (1998). Kinetics of crop
residue decomposition: Variability among crops and years. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62,
750–755.
Glissmann, K., and Conard, R. (1999). Fermentation pattern of methanogenic degradation of
rice straw in anoxic paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 31, 117–126.
Goodlass, G., and Smith, K. A. (1978). EVects of organic amendments on evolution of ethylene
and other hydrocarbons from soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 201–205.
Gotoh, S., and Onikura, Y. (1971). Organic acids in a flooded soil receiving added straw and
their eVect on the growth of rice. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 17, 1–8.
Gotoh, S., Koga, H., and Ono, S. I. (1984). EVect of long-term application of organic residues
on the distribution of organic matter and nitrogen in some rice soil profiles. Soil Sci. Plant
Nutr. 30, 273–285.
Goyal, S., and Chander, K. (1998). Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities as aVected by
incorporation of wheat straw in sandy loam. Environ. Ecol. 16, 393–396.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 389
Grace, P. R., Jain, M. C., Harrington, L., and Robertson, G. P. (2003). Long-term sustainability
of the tropical and subtropical rice-wheat system: Environmental perspective.
In ‘‘Improving the Productivity and Sustainability of Rice-Wheat Systems: Issues and
Impact. ASA, Spec. Publ. 65’’ (J. K. Ladha, J. E. Hill, J. M. Duxbury, Gupta, and R. J.
Buresh, Eds.), pp. 27–43. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Graham, J. P., Ellis, F. B., Christian, D. G., and Canell, R. G. (1986). EVects of straw residues on
the establishment, growth and yield of autumn-sown cereals. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 3, 33–49.
Guan, S. Y. (1989). Studies on the factors influencing soil enzyme activities: I. EVects of
organic manures on soil enzyme activities and N and P transformations. Acta Ped. Sinica
26, 72–78.
Guiraud, G. (1984). Contribution du marquage isotopiquea l’evaluation des transferts d’azote
entre les compartiments organiques et mineraux dans les systems sol-plante. These de
Doctrat d’Etat, Universite’ Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, France.
Guirad, G., and Berlier, Y. (1971). EVect of straw on the uptake of nitrogenous fertilizers
studied by means of 15N. Recent Adv. Plant Nutr. 1, 402–415.
Hagin, J., and Amberger, A. (1974). ‘‘Contribution of Fertilizers and Manures to N and P Load
of water. A Computer Simulation Model’’. Final report to the Deutsche Forischangs
Gemein Schaft from Technicon, Israel.
Haider, K., Fredrick, L. R., and Flaig, W. (1965). Reactions between amino acid compounds
and phenols during oxidation. Plant Soil 22, 49–64.
Halsall, D. M., Turner, G. L., and Gibson, A. H. (1985). Straw and xylem utilization by pure
cultures of nitrogen fixing Azotobacter spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49, 423–428.
Han, H. S., Lee, M. H., and Slum, J. S. (1991). EVects of long-term fertilizer application on
growth, yield and grain development of rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 36, 41–45.
Hassink, J. (1994). EVects of soil texture and grassland management on soil organic C and
N rates on C and N mineralization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 1221–1231.
Hassink, J., Bouwman, L. A., Zwart, K. B., and Brussard, L. (1993). Relationships between
habitable pore space, soil biota and mineralizable rates in grassland soils. Soil Biol.
Biochem. 25, 47–55.
Havis, R. N., and Alberts, E. E. (1993). Nutrient leaching from field decomposed corn and
soyabean residue under simulated rainfall. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 211–218.
Haynes, R. J. (1986). The decomposition process: mineralization, immobilization, humus pro-
duction and degradation. In ‘‘Mineral Nitrogen in the Soil-Plant System’’ (R. J. Haynes,
Ed.), pp. 52–106. Academic Press, London.
He, D. Y., Liao, X. L., Xing, T. X., Zhou, W. J., Fang, Y. J., and He, L. H. (1994). The fate of
nitrogen from 15N labelled straw and green manure in soil crop domestic animal system.
Soil Sci. 158, 65–73.
He, N., and Liu, Z. (1992). EVect of organic and chemical fertilizers on the grain yields and soil
properties. In ‘‘Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nutrient Management for
Sustained Productivity’’, Vol. II, pp. 130–132. Punjab Agric. Univ., Ludhiana, India.
Hegde, D. M. (1996). Integrated nutrient supply on crop productivity and soil fertility in rice
(Oryza sativa)-rice system. Indian J. Agron. 41, 1–8.
Henriksen, T. M., and Breland, T. A. (2002). Carbon mineralization, fungal and bacterial
growth, and enzyme activities as aVected by contact between crop residues and soil. Biol.
Fertil. Soils 35, 41–48.
Hill, N. M., Patriquin, D. G., and Sircom, K. (1990). Increased oxygen consumption in warmer
temperatures favours aerobic-nitrogen fixation in plant litters. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22,
321–325.
Honeycutt, C. W., and Potaro, L. J. (1990). Field evaluation of heat units for predicting crop
residue carbon and nitrogen mineralization. Plant Soil 125, 213–220.
390 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Hou, A. X., Wang, Z. P., Chen, G. X., and Patrick, W. H., Jr. (2000). EVects of organic and
N fertilizers on methane production potential in a Chinese rice soil and its microbiological
aspect. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 58, 333–338.
Houng, K. H., and Hwa, C. (1975). The eVect of crop resdiues on the growth of following crops
II. EVect of decomposing rice straw and bagasse on the nutrient uptake of rice seedlings.
J. Chinese Agril. Chem. Soc. 13, 412–415.
Houng, K. H., and Lin, T. P. (1976). The eVect of crop residues on the growth of following
crops. III. EVects of root residues of the first rice crop on the second rice crop. J. Chinese
Agril. Chem. Soc. 14, 145–150.
Howard, D. M., and Howard, P. J. A. (1993). Relationships between CO2 evolution, moisture
content, and temperature for a range of soil types. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 1537–1546.
Huang, Z. W., and Broadbent, F. E. (1988). The influences of organic residues on utilization of
urea N by rice. Fert. Res. 18, 213–220.
Huang, Z. W., and Lu, R. J. (1996). EVects of rice straw incorporation and soil pre-flooding on
the fate of applied (15NH4)2SO4-N and growth of rice. Pedosphere 6, 57–61.
Huke, R. E., and Huke, E. H. (1997). ‘‘Rice Area by Type of Culture: South, Southeast and East
Asia’’. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.
Hundal, H. S., and Thind, S. S. (1993). EVect of crop residue incorporation on labile and
dissolved P forms in soil. Indian J. Ecol. 20, 22–26.
Hussain, N., Hassan,G., Ullah, M. A., Tahir, A. G., Naseem, A. R., and Khan, G. D. (1996). Bio-
amelioration of sandy clay loam saline sodic Soil. In ‘‘Drainage in the 21st Century: Food
Production and Environment. Proc. 7th Int. Drainage Symp’’. pp. 293–300. Orlando, FL.
Hwang, K. N., Lee, Y. H., Shin, Y. K., and Rhee, G. S. (1993). A study on the behaviour of rice
straw nitrogen in paddy soil. RDA J. Agril. Sci. Soil Fert. 35, 289–294.
Illayas, M., Qureshi, R. H., and Quadir, M. A. (1997). Chemical changes in a saline-sodic soil
after gypsum application and cropping. Soil Technol. 10, 247–260.
Inoko, A. (1984). Compost as a source of plant nutrients. In ‘‘Organic Matter and Rice’’,
pp. 137–145. Int. Rice Res. Institute, Los Banos, Philippines.
Inubushi, K., Muramatsu, Y., and Umerayasi, M. (1992). Influence of percolation on methane
emission from flooded paddy soil. Japan J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 63, 184–189.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (1996). ‘‘Climate Change 1995. The
Science of Climate Change’’. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
IRRI (1986). ‘‘Annual Report’’. Int. Rice Res. Institute, Los Banos, Philippines.
Ishibashi, E., Akai, N., Ohya, M., Ishii, T., and Tsuruta, H. (2001). The influence of no-tilled
direct seeding cultivation on methane emission from three paddy fields in Okayama,
Western Japan. 2. The relationship between the continuation of no-tilled cultivation and
methane emission. Japan J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 72, 542–549.
Islam, M. M., and Dick, R. P. (1998a). EVect of organic residue amendment on mineralization
of sulfur in flooded rice soils under laboratory conditions. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.
29, 955–969.
Islam, M. M., and Dick, R. P. (1998b). EVect of wheat straw carbon: sulfur ratio on minerali-
zation of sulfur in soils under simulated laboratory aerobic-flooding cycles. Commun. Soil
Sci. Plant Anal. 29, 983–995.
Islam, M. M., Iyamuremye, F., and Dick, R. P. (1998). EVect of organic residue amendment on
mineralization of nitrogen in flooded rice soils under laboratory conditions. Commun. Soil
Sci. Plant Anal. 29, 971–981.
Ismunadji, M. (1978). Utilization of cereal crop residues and its agricultural significance in
Indonesia. Contributions, Central Research Institute for Agriculture, Bogor. (No. 37).
Ismunadji, M., Zulkarnaini, I., and Yazawa, F. (1973). The eVect of straw incorporation
on growth and nutrient status of lowland rice. 1. The eVect of straw incorporation on 13 rice
varieties. Contributions, Central Research Institute for Agriculture, Bogor. (No. 8).
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 391
Jain, M. C., Kumar, S., Wassmann, R., Mitra, S., Singh, S. D., Singh, J. P., Singh, R., Yadav,
A. K., and Gupta, S. (2000). Methane emissions from irrigated rice fields in northern India
(New Delhi). Nutrient Cycling Agroecosys. 58, 75–83.
Janzen, H. H. (1987). Soil organic matter characteristics after long-term cropping in various
spring wheat rotations. Can. J. Soil Sci. 67, 845–856.
Janzen, H. H., and Kucey, R. M. N. (1988). C, N and S mineralization of crop residues as
influenced by crop species and nutrient regime. Plant Soil 106, 35–41.
Jarvis, S. C., Stockdale, E. A., Shepherd, M. A., and Powlson, D. S. (1996). Nitrogen
mineralization in temperate agricultural soils: Process and measurement. Adv. Agron. 57,
187–235.
Jayaram,D.,Chatterjee,B.N., andMondal,S.S. (1990).EVectofFYM,cropresiduesand fertilizers
management in sustaining productivity under intensive cropping. J. Pot. Res. 6, 172–179.
Jenkins, B. M., Bakkar, R. R., Williams, R. B., Goronea, M. A., Carlson, W., DuVy, J., Baxter,
L. L., and Tiangco, V. M. (1997). Combustion of leached rice straw in Wheelbrator-Shasta
Boiler No. 1 at temperatures above 900 C. Paper No. 97 S-032, Western States Section/The
Combustion Institute. Spring Meeting, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA.
Jenkinson, D. S. (1971). Studies on the decomposition of C14 labelled organic matter in soil. Soil
Sci. 111, 64–70.
Jenkinson, D. S. (1977). Studies on the decomposition of plant material in soil. V. The eVects of
plant cover and soil type on the loss of carbon from 14C labelled ryegrass decomposing
under field conditions. J. Soil Sci. 28, 424–434.
Jenkinson, D. S. (1981). The fate of plant and animal residues in Soil. In ‘‘The Chemistry of Soil
Processes’’ (D. A. Greenland and M. H. B. Hayes, Eds.), pp. 505–561. John Wiley,
Chichester.
Jenkinson, D. S., and Rayner, J. H. (1977). The turnover of soil organic matter in some of the
Rothamsted classical experiments. Soil Sci. 123, 298–305.
Jensen, E. S. (1994). Mineralisation-immobilisation of nitrogen in soil amended with low C:N
ratio plant residues with diVerent particle sizes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 519–521.
Jensen, E. S. (1997). Nitrogen immobilization and mineralisation during initial decomposition
of 15N labelled pea and barley residues. Biol. Fertil. Soils 24, 39–44.
Jha, J. N., Roy, B., and Singh, S. P. (1992). EVect of combined-application of organic manures
and inorganic fertilizer on rice and their residue on wheat. J. Appl. Biol. 2, 55–59.
Jiang, Y. F., Jiang, X. H., and Zhou, L. (1998). Techniques for return of straw to fields and
combined application of nitrogen fertilizer. Jiangsu Agril. Sci. 4, 43–45.
John, P. S., Prasad, R., Pandey, R. K., Buresh, R. J., and Prasad, R. (1989). Lowland rice
response to urea following three cowpea cropping systems. Agron. J. 81, 853–857.
Kaboneka, S., Sabbe, W. E., and Mauromoustakos, A. (1997). Carbon decomposition kinetics
and nitrogen mineralization from corn, soybean, and wheat residues. Commun. Soil Sci.
Plant Anal. 28, 1359–1373.
Kamalan, J., Tomy, P. J., and Nair, N. R. (1989). Integrated organic and inorganic fertilizers for
flooded rice in Kerala, India. Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 14(1), 20.
Kanal, A. (1995). EVect of incorporation depth and soil climate on straw decomposition rate in
a loamy Podzoluvisol. Biol. Fertil. Soils 20, 190–196.
Kanazawa, S., and Yoneyama, T. (1980). Microbial degradation of 15N-labelled rice residues in
soil during two years incubationunder flooded and upland conditions. II. Transformation
of residue nitrogen. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 26, 241–254.
Kang, Y. L. (1988). EVects of organic matter and its anaerobic decomposition products on the
growth and zinc uptake by Oryza sativa. Disser. Abst. Int. B (Sci. and Eng.) 49, 953B.
Kanungo, P. K., Ramakrishnan, B., and Rao, V. R. (1997). Placement eVects of organic sources
on nitrogenase activity and nitrogen-fixing bacteria in flooded rice soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils
25, 103–108.
392 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Kapur, M. L., and Kanwar, R. S. (1994). Sugarbeet top as a source of N for maize and
rice grown in rotation with sugarbeet in subtropical north-west India. Trop. Agri. 71,
12–16.
Karlen, D. L., Wollenhaupt, N. C., Erbach, D. C., Berry, E. C., Swan, J. B., Eash, N. S., and
Jordahl, J. L. (1994). Crop residue eVects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn.
Soil Tillage Res. 31, 149–167.
Katyal, J. C. (1977). Influence of organic matter on the chemical and electrochemical properties
of some flooded soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 9, 259–266.
Katyal, V., Sharma, S. K., and Gangwar, K. S. (1998). Stability analysis of rice (Oryza sativa)-
wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in integrated nutrient management. Indian
J. Agril. Sci. 68, 51–53.
Kavinandan, S. K., Gupta, J. P., and Mahapatra, I. C. (1987). Studies on residue management
and biofertilizers in rice-wheat sequence. Indian J. Agron. 32, 278–279.
Kawaguchi, S., Kai, H., and Aibe, T. (1986). Nitrogen dynamics in soils following the addition
of 15N-labelled rice straw. J. Faculty Agri. Kyushu Univ. 30, 247–252.
Khind, C. S., and Bajwa, M. S. (1993). Urea hydrolysis in wetland soil amended with Sesbania
aculeata green manure and rice straw. Biol. Fertil. Soils 15, 65–67.
Kimbler, R. W. L. (1973). Phytotoxicity from plant residues. 3. The relative eVect of toxins and
nitrogen immobilization on the germination and growth of wheat. Plant Soil 38, 543–555.
Kirkby, C. A. (1999). Survey of current rice stubble management practices for identification of
research needs and future policy. RIRDC Project NO. CSL-5A.
Kladivko, E. J. (1994). Residue eVects on soil physical properties. In ‘‘Managing Agricultural
Residues’’ (P. W. Unger, Ed.), pp. 123–141. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
Kondo, A., Arai, F., Tachikawa, Y., Iizuka, K., Kanai, H., Abe, M., and Shimada, T. (1980).
Prevention of paddy rice growth by manuring with wheat straw after harvest and its
control. Bull. Gunma Agril. Exptl. Stn. 20, 1–10.
Kosuge, N., and Zulkernaini, I. (1981). EVect of straw application to paddy field in Indonesia.
Bull. Hokuriku Natl. Agric. Exptl. Stn. 23, 167–186.
Koyama, T. (1981). The transformations and balance of nitrogen in Japanese paddy fields. Fert.
Res. 2, 261–270.
Kuboto, M. (1984). The influence of the application of rice straw and nitrogen manuring on
heavy clayey paddy fields. J. Nilgata Agric. Expl. Stn. 33, 81–93.
Kulkarni, K. R., and Pandey, R. K. (1988). Annual legumes for food and as green manure in a
rice-based cropping system. In ‘‘Sustainable Agriculture-Green Manure in Rice Farming’’,
pp. 280–289. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Banos, Philippines.
Kumar, A., and Yadav, D. S. (1995). Use of organic manure and fertilizer in rice (Oryza sativa)-
wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system for sustainability. Indian J. Agri. Sci. 65, 703–707.
Kumar, K., and Goh, K. M. (2000). Crop residues and management practices: EVects on soil
quality, soil nitrogen dynamics, crop yields, and nitrogen recovery. Adv. Agron. 68,
197–319.
Kumar, V., Ghosh, B. C., and Bhat, K. (2000). Complementary eVect of crop wastes and
inorganic fertilizers on yield, nutrient uptake and residual fertility in mustarad (Brassica
juncea) rice (Oryza sativa) cropping sequence. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 70, 69–72.
Kundu, A. L., Ghosh, R. K., and Mondal, T. K. (1994). EVect of crop waste on production in a
rice-wheat crop sequence under rainfed condition in the Gangetic plains of West Bengal.
Adv. Plant Sci. 7, 228–234.
Kuo, S., Sainju, U. M., and Jellum, E. J. (1997). Winter cover crop eVects on soil organic carbin
and carbohydrate in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 145–152.
Kushwaha, C. P., Tripathi, S. K., and Singh, K. P. (2000). Variations in soil microbial biomass
and N availability due to residue and tillage management in a dryland rice agroecosystem.
Soil Till. Res. 56, 153–166.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 393
Kwak, H. K., Lee, C. S., and Lim, S. K. (1990). Influence of soil amendments on phosphorus
response and changes of available phosphate amount in paddy soil. Res. Rep. Rural Dev.
Admin. Soil Fertil. 32, 52–56.
Ladatko, A. G., and Emtsev, V. T. (1984). The eVect of rice straw application on the activity of
the anaerobic microflora in submerged rice field soils. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoi Sel’skokho-
zyaistvennoi Akademii 1, 97–103.
Ladd, J. N., Amato, M., Jackson, R. B., and Butler, J. H. A. (1983). Utilization by wheat crops
of nitrogen from legume residues decomposing in soils in the field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15,
231–238.
Ladd, J. N., and Foster, R. C. (1988). Role of soil microflora in nitrogen turnover. In ‘‘Advances
in Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems’’ (J. R. Wilson, Ed.), pp. 113–133. CAB
International, Great Britain.
Ladd, J. N., van Gestel, M., Monrozier, L. J., and Amato, M. (1996). Distribution of organic14C and 15N in particle-size fractions of soils incubated with 14C, 15N-labelled glucose, NH4,
and legume and wheat straw residues. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 893–905.
Lanjewar, M. M., Shelke, D. K., Jadhao, S. L., and Hiwase, B. J. (1992). Studies on eVect of
incorporation of rice straw in soil on its properties, rice yield and its residual eVect on
succeeding chickpea. J. Soils Crops 2, 52–55.
Larson, W. E., Clapp, C. E., Pierre, W. H., and Morachan, Y. B. (1972). EVects of increasing
amounts of organic residues on continuous corn. II. Organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus
and sulfur. Agron. J. 64, 204–208.
Larson, W. E., Holt, R. F., and Carlson, C. W. (1978). Residues for soil conservation. In ‘‘Crop
Residue Management System. ASA Spl. Publication No. 31’’ (W. R. Oschwald, M. Stelly,
D. M. Karl, and J. H. Nauseef, Eds.), pp. 1–15. American Society of Agronomy, Madison,
WI.
Lee, K., Kang, J. G., Uhm-Taek, Y., Kim-Jong, G., Kim-Sun, K., and Rhee, G. S. (1995). The
eVect of long-term organic matter application on N, P and K uptake by rice in paddy soil.
RDA J. Agril. Sci. Soil Fert. 37, 291–297.
Li, H. Z., Han, H. R., Wu, Z. C., Yang, J. C., and Ge, L. M. (1986). A study on the eYcacy of
organic manures in improvement of paddy soil fertility. J. Soil Sci. China 17, 252–258.
Li, S. Y., Wang, J. Y., and Kong, W. G. (1981). Characteristics of the nitrogen supply in paddy
soils. 1. In diVerent paddy soils. Acta Pedologica Sinica 18, 50–57.
Li, Z., and Lin, X. X. (1993). Decomposition of plant materials in upland and submerged soils
under diVerent climatic conditions. Pedosphere 3, 89–92.
Liu, J. R., and Shen, R. P. (1992). The eVects of fertilization on the properties and role of soil
organic matter. In ‘‘Proceedings of International Symposium on Paddy Soils’’, pp. 246–251.
Nanjing, China.
Liu, C. G., and Weng, B. Q. (1991). The function and potential of biofertilizer and organic
manure in agricultural production. The new models and research advances in Fujian,
China. Regional OYce for Asia and the Pacific (RAPA) Report No. 7, 11–126.
Liu, J. R., Zhang, D. Y., and Zhou, W. (1990). The eVects of mixed application of organic and
inorganic fertilizers to paddy soil (third report). Acta Agric. Universitatis Jiangxiensis 12,
37–42.
Liu, Z. P., Gao, Z. M., Shi, R. J., Dai, Z. X., and Feng, K. (1996). EVect of carbon and C to
N ratio on the characteristics of soil nitrogen supply under aerobic and anaerobic incuba-
tion. J. Nanjing Agricultural Univ. 19, 70–74.
Loli, O. O., and Chuguizuta, F. (1993). EVect of crop rotations and incorporation of residues on
yield of dry season rice (Oryza sativaL.). In ‘‘Proceedings of the 11thLatin-AmericanCongress
and the 2nd Cuban Congress of Soil Science, Vol. V’’, pp. 1418–1424. Havana, Cuba.
Luo, S. M., and Cheng, C. H. (1991). Research on decomposition dynamics of organic matter in
rice fields. J. South China Agril. Univ. 12, 14–18.
394 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Lynch, J. M. (1977). Phytotoxicity of acetic acid produced in the anaerobic decomposition of
wheat straw. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 42, 81–87.
Lynch, J. M., and Elliott, L. F. (1983). Minimizing the potential phytotoxicity of wheat straw by
microbial degradation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 221–222.
Lynch, J. M., and Gunn, K. B. (1978). The use of the chemostat to study the decomposition of
wheat straw in soil slurries. J. Soil Sci. 29, 531–536.
Magbanua, R. D., Torres, R. O., and Garrity, D. P. (1988). Crop residue management
for sustaining crop productivity in acid upland cropping systems. Philippines J. Crop Sci.
13, 1–6.
Magid, J., Mueller, T., Jensen, L. S., and Nielsen, N. E. (1997). Modelling the measurable
Interpretation of field-scale CO2 and N-mineralisation, soil microbial biomass and light
fractions as indicators of oilseed rape, maize and barley straw decomposition. In ‘‘Driven
by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition’’ (G. Cadisch and K. E. Giller, Eds.),
pp. 349–362. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Majumdar, D., Kumar, S., and Jain, M. C. (1998). Methane entrapment in diVerent rice soils of
India. Curr. Sci. 75, 951–955.
Malik, N., and Jaiswal, L. M. (1993). Integrated use of organic and inorganic nitrogen sources
and levels of N in wetland rice (Oryza sativa) in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian J. Agron. 38,
641–643.
Malik, V., Kaur, B., and Gupta, S. R. (1998). Soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineraliza-
tion in straw incorporated soils. In ‘‘Ecological Agriculture and Sustainable Development,
Proceedings of the International Conference on Ecological Agriculture: Towards Sustain-
able Development, Vol. 1’’, pp. 557–565. Chandigarh, India.
Martin, U., Neue, H. U., Scharpenseel, H. W., and Becker, P. M. (1983). Anaerobic decompo-
sition of rice straw in a flooded rice soil in the Philippines. Mitteil. Deutsch. Bodenk. Gesell
38, 245–250.
Mary, B., Recous, S., Darwis, D., and Robin, D. (1996). Interactions between decomposition of
plant residues and nitrogen cycling in soil. Plant Soil 181, 71–82.
Masayna, W., Kai, H., and Kawaguchi, S. (1985). Nitrogen behavior in tropical wetland rice
soils. 2. The eYciency of fertilizer nitrogen, priming eVect and A-values. Fert. Res. 6, 37–47.
McCarty, G. W., and Bremner, J. M. (1991). Inhibition of nitrification in soil by gaseous
hydrocarbons. Boil. Fertil. Soils 11, 231–233.
McGarity, J. W., and Hoult, E. H. (1971). The plant component as a factor in ammonia
volatilization from pasture swards. J. Brit. Grassld. Soc. 26, 31–34.
McGill, W. B., Cannon, K. R., Robertson, J. A., and Cook, F. D. (1986). Dynamics of soil
microbial biomass and water soluble organic C in Breton after 50 years of cropping to two
rotations. Can. J. Soil Sci. 66, 1–19.
McInnes, K. J., Ferguson, R. B., Kissel, D. E., and Kanemasu, E. T. (1986). Ammonia loss from
applications of urea-ammonium nitrate solution to straw residue. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50,
964–974.
McLaughlin, M. J., Alston, A. M., and Mattin, J. K. (1988). Phosphorus cyling in wheat-
pasture rotations. I. The source of phosphorus taken up by wheat. Aust. J. Soil Res. 26,
323–332.
Meelu, O. P., Yadvinder-Singh, Bijay-Singh, Khera, T. S., and Kumar, K. (1994). Crop residues
recycling and green manuring for soil and crop productivity improvement in rice-wheat
cropping system. In ‘‘Temperate Rice-Achievements and Potentials’’ (E. Humphreys, E. A.
Murray, W. S. Clampett, and L. Q. Lewin, Eds.), Vol. 2, pp. 605–613. NSW Agriculture,
GriYth, NSW, Australia.
Mellilo, J. M., Aber, J. D., and Muratore, J. F. (1982). Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood
leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecol. Monograph 63, 621–626.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 395
Merckx, R., Den Hartoy, A., and van Veen, J. A. (1985). Turnover of root-derived material and
related microbial biomass formation in soils of diVerent texture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17,
565–569.
Misra, R. D., Pandey, D. S., and Gupta, V. K. (1996). Crop residue management for increasing
the productivity and sustainability in rice-wheat system. In ‘‘Abstract of Poster Sessions’’,
2nd International Crop Science Congress, p. 42. National Academy of Agricultural
Sciences and ICAR, New Delhi, India.
Mishra, B., Sharma, P. K., and Bronson, K. F. (2001a). Kinetics of wheat straw decomposition
and nitrogen mineralization in rice field soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 49, 49–54.
Mishra, B., Sharma, P. K., and Bronson, K. F. (2001b). Decomposition of rice straw and
mineralization of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in wheat field soil in western
Uttar Pradesh. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 49, 419–424.
Mitra, S., Jain, M. C., Kumar, S., Bandyopadhyay, S. K., and Kalra, N. (1999). EVect of rice
cultivars on methane emission. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 73, 177–183.
Miura, Y. (1995). Mitigation of methane emission from rice paddy fields by organic matter
management. Sekkai Chisso Dayori 130, 19–23in Japanese.
Miura, Y., and Kanno, T. (1997). Emissions of trace gases (CO2, CO, CH4 and N2O) resulting
from rice straw burning. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 43, 849–854.
Molina, J. A. E., Clapp, C. E., SchaVer, M. J., Chichester, F. W., and Larsen, W. E. (1983).
NCSOIL a model of nitrogen and carbon tranformations in soil: Description, calibration
and behavior. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47, 85–91.
Moorman, F. R., and Van Breeman, N. (1978). ‘‘Rice, Soil, Water and Land’’. International
Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines.
More, S. D. (1994). EVect of farm wastes and organic manures on soil properties, nutrient
availability and yield of rice and wheat grown on sodic vertisol. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 42,
253–256.
Mosier, A. R., Duxubury, J. M., Freney, J. R., Heinemeyer, O., and Minami, K. (1998a).
Assessing and mitigating N2O emissions from agricultural soils. Climatic Change 40,
7–38.
Mosier, A. R., Duxubury, J. M., Freney, J. R., Heinmeyer, O., Minami, K., and Johnson, D. E.
(1998b). Mitigating agricultural emissions of methane. Climate Change 40, 39–80.
Mtambanengwe, F., and Kirchmann, H. (1995). Litter from a tropical savanna woodland
(miombo): Chemical composition and C and N mineralisation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27,
1639–1651.
Mt Pleasant, J., McCollum, R. E., and Coble, H. D. (1992). Weed management in low-input
cropping system in the Peruvian Amazon region. Tropical Agric. 69, 250–259.
Mukherjee, D., Chattopadhyay, M. K., and Chakravarty, A. (1995). Some aspects of chemical
changes as influenced by diVerent organic additives in Entisol of Gangetic origin. Adv.
Plant Sci. 8, 169–176.
Muller, M. M., Sundman, V., Soininvaara, O., and Merilainen, A. (1988). EVect of chemical
composition on the release of nitrogen from agricultural plant materials decomposing in
soil under field conditions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 6, 78–83.
Murphy, B. W., Koen, T. B., Jones, B. A., and Huxedrup, L. M. (1993). Temporal variation of
hydraulic properties for some soils with fragile structure. Aust. J. Soil Res. 31, 179–197.
Murty, G. K., and Singh, T. A. (1976). Interrelationships between electrochemical changes and
reduction conditions in submerged calcareous soils. Riso 25, 271–282.
Myers, R. J. K., Palm, C. A., Cuevas, E., Gunatilleke, I. U. N., and Brossard, M. (1994). The
synchronisation of nutrient mineralisation and plant nutrient demand. In ‘‘The Biological
Management of Tropical Soil Fertility’’ (P. L. Woomer and M. J. Swift, Eds.), pp. 81–116.
John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
396 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Nagarajah, S., Neue, H.-U., and Alberto, M. C. R. (1989). EVect of Sesbania, Azolla and rice
straw incorporation on the kinetics of NH4, K, Fe, Mn, Zn and P in some flooded rice soils.
Plant Soil 116, 37–48.
Naklang, K., Whitbread, A., Lefroy, R., Blair, G., Wonprasaid, S., Konboon, Y., and Suriya-
Arunroj, D. (1999). The management of rice straw, fertilizers and leaf litters in rice
cropping systems in northeast Thailand. Plant Soil 209, 21–28.
Nambiar, K. K. M. (1994). ‘‘Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity under Long-Term Fertilizer
Use in India’’. Indian Council for Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Narang, R. S., Brar, S. S., and Kumar, S. (1999). EVect of crop-residue incorporation load on
nitrogen requirement of succeeding crops and soil productivity in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat
(Triticum aestivum) system. Indian J. Agron. 44, 8–11.
Narayanasamy, G., and Biswas, D. R. (1998). Phosphate rocks of India: Potentialities and
constraints. Fert. News 43(10), 21–28.
Neely, C. L., Beare, M. H., Hargrove, W. L., and Coleman, D. C. (1991). Relationships between
fungal and bacterial substrate-induced respiration biomass and polant residue decomposi-
tion. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 947–954.
Nelson, C. J. (1996). Allelopathy in cropping systems. Agron. J. 88, 991–996.
Nelson, P. N., Ladd, J. N., and Oades, J. M. (1996). Decomposition of 14C-labelled plant
material in a salt-aVected soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 433–441.
Neue, H.-U. (1993). Methane emission from rice fields. Bioscience 43, 466–474.
Neue, H.-U., and Sass, R. (1996). Trace gas emissions from rice fields. Global Atmos. Biospheric
Chem. 48, 119–147.
Neue, H.-U., Lantin, R. S., Wassmann, R., Aduna, J. B., Alberto, C. R., and Andales, M.
J. F. (1994). Methane emission from rice soils of the Philippines. In ‘‘CH4 and N2O:
Global Emissions and Controls from Rice Fields and Other Agricultural and Industrial
Sources’’ (K. Minami, A. Mosier, and R. L. Sass, Eds.), pp. 55–63. Yokendo, Tokyo,
Japan.
Nieder, R., and Richter, J. (1986). Einflub der Strobdungung auf den Verlauf der N-mineraliza-
tion eines Lob Parabraunde-Ap Horozontes in Saulen Brut versuch. Z. Pflanzen. Bodenkd.
149, 202–210.
Nieder, R., and Richter, J. (1989). The significance of wheat straw decomposition with regard to
the C- and N-cycle of a cultivated loess soil. Z. Pflanzen. Bodenkd. 152, 415–420.
Ning, C. G., and Hu, T. G. (1990). The role of straw-covering in crop production and soil
management. Better Crops Int. 6(2), 6–7.
Nishio, T., Sekiya, H., and Kogano, K. (1993). Estimate of nitrogen cycling in 15N-amended soil
during long-term submergence. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 785–788.
Norman, R. J., Gilmour, J. T., and Wells, B. R. (1990). Mineralization of nitrogen from
nitrogen-15 labeled crop residues and utilization by rice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54,
1351–1356.
Novak, B. (1974). Nitrogen immobilization as aVected by straw. Ann. Microbial. Enzymol. 24,
151–157.
Nugroho, S. G., and Kuwatsuka, S. (1992a). Concurrent observation of several processes of
nitrogen metabolism in soil amended with organic materials. III. Changes in microbial
populations following application of ammonium-nitrogen. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 38,
601–610.
Nugroho, S. G., and Kuwatsuka, S. (1992b). Concurrent observation of several processes of
nitrogen metabolism in soil amended with organic materials. IV. Regulatory eVects of
ammonium- and nitrate-nitrogen on denitrification and N2 fixation. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.
38, 611–617.
Nyhan, J. W. (1976). Influence of soil temperature and water tension on the decomposition rate
of carbon-14 labeled herbage. Soil Sci. 121, 288–293.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 397
Ocio, J. A., and Brooks, P. C. (1990). An evaluation of methods for measuring the microbial
biomass in soils following recent additions of wheat straw and the characterization of the
biomass that develops. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 685–694.
Ocio, J. A., Brooks, P. C., and Jenkinson, D. S. (1991). Field incorporation of rice straw and its
eVect on soil micribial biomass and soil inorganic N. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 171–176.
Oh, W. K. (1979). EVect of incorporation of organic materials on paddy Soils. In ‘‘Nitrogen and
Rice’’, pp. 435–449. Int. Rice Res. Institute, Los Banos, Philippines.
Oh, W. K. (1984). EVects of organic matter on rice production. In ‘‘Organic Matter and Rice’’,
pp. 477–488. Int. Rice Res. Institute, Los Banos, Philippines.
Ohno, T., and Erich, M. S. (1997). Inhibitory eVects of crop residue-derived organic ligands on
phosphate adsorption kinetics. J. Environ. Qual. 26, 889–895.
Olk, D. C., Cassman, K. G., Randall, E. W., Kinchesh, P., Sanger, L. J., and Anderson, J. M.
(1996). Changes in chemical properties of organic matter with intensified rice cropping in
tropical lowland soil. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47, 293–303.
Olk, D. C., van Kessel, C., and Bronson, K. F. (2000). Managing soil organic matter in rice and
nonrice soils: Agronomic queations. In ‘‘Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Flooded Soils.
Proceedings of the Workshop on Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Flooded Soils’’
(G. J. D. Kirk and D. C. Olk, Eds.), pp. 27–47. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Banos, Philippines.
Ono, S. (1989). Nitrogen mineralization from paddy and upland soils under flooded and
nonflooded incubation. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 35, 417–428.
Pal, D., and Broadbent, F. E. (1975). Influence of moisture on rice straw decomposition in soils.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 39, 59–63.
Pal, D., Broadbent, F. E., and Mikkelson, D. S. (1975). Influence of temperature on the kinetics
of rice straw decomposition in soils. Soil Sci. 120, 442–449.
Palm, C. A. (1995). Contribution of agroforestry trees to nutrient requirements of intercropped
plants. Agroforestry Syst. 30, 105–124.
Palm, C. A., and Sanchez, P. A. (1991). Nitrogen release from the leaves of some tropical
legumes as aVected by their lignin and polyphenolic contents. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 83–88.
Pandey, N., and Tripathi, R. S. (1992). Grain yield of lowland rice (Oryza sativa) as influenced
by integrated use of inorganic and organic nitrogen fertilizer. Indian J. Agron. 37, 561–562.
Pandey, S. P., Shankar, H., and Sharma, V. K. (1985). EYcacy of some organic and inorganic
residues in relation to crop yield and soil characteristics. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 33, 178–181.
Parashar, D. C., Rai, J., Gupta, P. K., and Singh, N. (1991). Parameters aVecting methane
emission from paddy fields. Indian J. Radio Space Phys. 20, 12–17.
Parr, J. F., and Papendick, R. I. (1978). Factors aVecting the decomposition of crop residues by
microorganisms. In ‘‘Crop Residue Management Systems. ASA Special Publication No.
31’’ (W. R. Oschwald, Ed.), pp. 101–129. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.
Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B., and Cole, C. V. (1988). Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland
soil: A model. Biogeochemistry 5, 109–131.
Patel, R. G., and Sarkar, M. C. (1993). Mineralization and immobilization of nitrogen in soils
mixed with wheat straw. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 41, 33–37.
Patel, S. R., Thakur, D. S., and Pandya, K. S. (1997). Response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to
nitrogen levels and preconditioned urea in an Inceptisol. Fert. News 42(8), 37–40.
Pathak, H., and Sarkar, M. C. (1997). Nitrogen supplementation with rice straw in an Usto-
chrept. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 45, 103–107.
Patil, M. N., Zade, K. B., Naphade, K. T., and Kharkar, P. T. (1993). Decomposition of organic
materials in soil in relation to nutrient mineralization. J. Maharashtra Agril. Univ. 18,
348–351.
Patra, D. D., Bhandari, J. C., and Misra, A. (1992). EVect of plant residues on the size of
microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralization in soil: Incorporation of cowpea and wheat
straw. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 38, 1–6.
398 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Patrick, W. H., Jr., and Gotoh, S. (1974). The role of oxygen in nitrogen loss from flooded soils.
Soil Sci. 118, 78–81.
Patrick, Z. A., Toussoun, T. A., and Snyder, W. C. (1963). Phytotoxic substances in arable soils
associated with decomposition of plant residues. Phytopathology 53, 152–161.
Paul, E. A., and Clark, F. E. (1989). ‘‘Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry’’. Academic Press,
San Diego, CA.
Paustian, K., Collins, H. P., and Paul, E. A. (1997). Management controls on soil carbon.
In ‘‘Soil Organic Matter Agroecosystems: Long-Term Experiments in North America’’
(E. A. Paul, K. Paustian, E. T. Elliott, and C. V. Cole, Eds.), pp. 15–49. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, FL.
Phongpan, S. (1987). EVects of organic materials and urea on the release of ammonium nitrogen
and urease activity in a flooded soil. Thai J. Agri. Sci. 20, 111–120.
Phongpan, S. (1989). Phosphorus adsorption in flooded soils of the Central Plain. Thai J. Agri.
Sci. 22, 113–127.
Ponnamperuma, F. N. (1984). Straw as a source of nutrients for wetland rice. In ‘‘Organic
Matter and Rice’’, pp. 117–135. Int. Rice Res. Institute, Los Banos, Philippines.
Prasad, B. (1999). Conjoint use of fertilizers with organics, crop residues and green manuring for
their eYcient use in sustainable crop production. Fert. News 44(5), 67–73.
Prasad, B., and Sinha, S. K. (1995a). EVect of recycling of crop residues and organic manure on
capacity factor and diVusion rate of zinc in calcareous soil. J. Nuclear Agri. Biol. 24,
185–188.
Prasad, B., and Sinha, S. K. (1995b). Nutrient recycling through crop residues management for
sustainable rice and wheat production in calcareous soil. Fert. News 40(11), 15–2325.
Prasad, R., Ganagiah, B., and Alpe, K. C. (1999). EVect of crop residue management in a rice-
wheat cropping system on growth and yield of crops and on soil fertility. Exptl. Agric. 35,
427–435.
Prasad, R., and Power, J. F. (1991). Crop residue management. Adv. Soil Sci. 15, 205–239.
Prasad, R., John, P. S., George, M., Singh, S., and Sharma, S. N. (1990). EVect of lentil residue
management on the productivity and NPK removal by lentil-rice double cropping. Lens
Newsl. 17(1), 5–9.
Prasad, R., and Palaniappan, S. P. (1987). Pulse crop residue as N source in rice-based cropping
system. Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 12(1), 31.
Puig-Gimenez, M. H., and Chase, F. E. (1984). Laboratory studies of factors aVecting microbial
degradation of wheat straw residues in soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 64, 9–19.
Puttaswamygowda, B. S., and Pratt, P. F. (1973). EVects of straw, calcium chloride and
submergence on a sodic soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 208–212.
Qiu, F. Q., and Ding, Q. T. (1986). Role of organic matter in regulating soil ferttility. II. EVect
of organic matter on availability of phosphorus and trace elements in soil. J. Soil Sci. China
17(Suppl.), 73–76.
Raj, H., and Gupta, V. K. (1986). Influence of organic manures and zinc on wheat yield and Zn
concentration in wheat. Agril. Wastes 16, 255–263.
Rajput, A. L. (1995). EVect of fertilizer and organic manure on rice (Oryza sativa) and their
residual eVect on wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J. Agron. 40, 292–294.
Raju, R. A., Reddy, G. V., and Reddy, M. N. (1987). Green leaf and paddy straw incorporation
as supplemental sources of nitrogen to rice. Indian J. Agron. 32, 170–171.
Raju, R. A., and Reddy, M. N. (2000). Integrated management of green leaf, compost, crop-
residues and inorganic fertilizers in rice (Oryza, sativa)-rice system. Indian J. Agron. 45,
629–635.
Ramaswami, P. P. (1979). Economic recycling of crop residues for soil fertility improvement.
Madras Agric. J. 66, 737–743.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 399
Rao, D. N., and Mikkelsen, D. S. (1976). EVect of rice straw incorporation on rice plant growth
and nutrition. Agron. J. 68, 752–755.
Rao, D. N., and Mikkelsen, D. S. (1977). EVects of acetic, propionic, and butyric acids on rice
seedling growth and nutrition. Plant Soil 47, 323–334.
Rao, V. R. (1973). The eVect of straw as a fertilizer on rice yields. Izvestiya Akad. Nauk. USSR
Biolgic. 3, 420–422.
Rao, V. R. (1976). Nitrogen fixation as influenced by moisture content, ammonium sulphate
and organic sources in a paddy soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8, 445–448.
Rao, V. R. (1980). Change in nitrogen fixation in flooded paddy field/soil amended with rice
straw and ammonium sulphate. Riso 28, 29–31.
Rath, A. K., Mohanty, S. K., Mishra, S., Kumaraswamy, S., Ramakrishnan, B., and
Sethunathan, N. (1999). Methane production in unamended and rice-straw-amended
soil at diVerent moisture levels. Biol. Fertil. Soils 28, 143–149.
Rathore, A. L., Pal, A. R., and Sahu, K. K. (1998). Tillage and mulching eVects on water use,
root growth and yield of rainfed mustard and chickpea grown after lowland rice. J. Sci.
Food Agri. 78, 149–161.
Rattan, K. R., Singh, M. P., Singh, R. O., and Singh, U. S. P. (1996). Long term eVect of
inorganic and organic-inorganic nutrient supply system on yield trends in rice-wheat
cropping system. J. Appl. Biol. 6, 56–58.
Reddy, M. V., Reddy, V. R., Yule, D. F., Cogle, A. L., and George, P. J. (1994). Decomposition
of straw in relation to tillage, moisture, and arthropod abundance in a semi-arid tropical
Alfisol. Biol. Fertil. Soils 17, 45–50.
Reinertsen, S. A., Elliott, L. F., Cochran, V. L., and Campbell, G. S. (1984). Role of available
carbon and nitrogen in determining the rate of wheat straw decomposition. Soil Sci.
Biochem. 16, 459–464.
Rekhi, R. S., and Meelu, O. P. (1983). EVect of complementary use of moong straw and
inorganic fertilizer N on the nitrogen availability and yield of rice. Oryza 20, 125–129.
Rennenberg, H., Wassmann, R., Papen, H., and Seiler, W. (1992). Trace gas exchange in rice
cultivation. Ecol. Bull. 42, 164–173.
Rice, W. A., and Paul, E. A. (1972). The organisms and biological process involved in asym-
biotic nitrogen fixation in waterlogged soil amended with straw. Can. J. Microbiol. 18,
715–723.
Rixon, A. J., Xianliang, Y., and Xia, Z. H. (1991). EVect of heavy applications of organic
residues on the physical properties of paddy soils in China. Soil Tillage Res. 20, 101–108.
Robin, D. (1994). EVect de la disponibilite de l’azote sur les flux bruts de C and N au cours de la
decomposition des residus vegetaux dans le sol. These INA-PG, Paris, France.
Rodhe, H. (1990). A comparison of the contribution of various gases in the greenhouse eVect.
Science 248, 1217–1219.
Roeder, W., Keoboulapha, B., Phengchanh, S., Prot, J. C., and Matias, D. (1998). EVect of
residue management and fallow length on weeds and rice yield. Weed Res. (Oxford) 38,
167–174.
Roper, M. M. (1983). Field measurements of nitrogenase activity in soils amended with wheat
straw. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34, 725–739.
Roper, M. M. (1985). Straw decomposition and nitrogenase activity (C2H2 reduction): EVect of
soil moisture and temperature. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 65–71.
Roper, M. M., and Halsall, D. M. (1986). Use of products of straw decomposition by N2-fixing
(C2H2-reducing) populations of bacteria in three soils from wheat growing areas. Aust.
J. Agri. Res. 37, 1–9.
Roper, M. M., and Ladha, J. K. (1995). Biological N2 fixation by heterotrophic and phototropic
bacteria in association with straw. Plant Soil 174, 211–224.
400 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Roper, M. M., and Watanabe, I. (1986). Technologies for utilizing biological nitrogen fixation
in wetland rice: Potentialities, current usage, and limiting factors. Fert. Res. 9, 39–77.
Roper, M. M., Marschke, G. W., and Smith, N. A. (1989). Nitrogernase activity (C2H2
reduction) in soils following wheat straw reduction: EVects of straw management. Aust.
J. Agric. Res. 40, 241–253.
Roper, M. M., Turpin, J. A., and Thompson, J. P. (1994). Nitrogenase activity (C2H2 reduction)
by free living bacteria in soil in a long-term tillage and stubble management experiment in a
vertisol. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 1087–1091.
Roppongi, K. (1987). EVects of continuous application of rice and wheat straw on the growth of
crops and fertility of paddy soil. Bull. Saltamn Agric. Exp. Stn. 42, 17–60.
Roppongi, K., Ishigami, T., and Takeda, M. (1993). EVects of continuous application of rice
straw compost on chemical and physical properties of soil in an upland field. Japanese
J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 64, 27–33.
Russo, S. (1974). EVects of ploughing under rice straw in submerged soils with monocultural
rotation. Preliminary results obtained during the first year. Riso 23, 209–218.
Rutu, I., and Widjaja, A. G. (1994). The use of chemical fertilizers combined with organic
fertilizers in crop production in Indonesia. In ‘‘Combined Use of Chemical and Organic
Fertilizers’’, pp. 1–16. Mardi, Malaysia.
Saha, N., Das, A. C., and Mukherjee, D. (1995). EVect of decomposition of organic matter on
the activities of microorganisms and availability of nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur in
soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 43, 210–215.
Saini, R. C. (1989). Mass loss and nitrogen concentration changes during the decomposition of
rice residues under field conditions. Pedobiologia 33, 229–235.
Saini, R. C., Gupta, S. R., and Rajvanshi, R. (1984). Chemical composition, and decomposition
of crop residues in soil. Pedobiologia 27, 323–329.
Salim, M. (1995). Rice crop residue use for crop production. In ‘‘Organic Recycling in Asia and
the Pacific. RAPA Bulletin Vol. 11’’, p. 99. Regional OYce for Asia and the Pacific, FAO of
the United Nations, Bangkok, Thailand.
Samra, J. S., Bijay-Singh, and Kumar, K. (2003). Managing crop residues in the rice-wheat
system of the Indo-Gangetic plain. In ‘‘Improving the Productivity and Sustainability of
Rice-Wheat Systems: Issues and Impact. ASA, Spec. Publ. 65’’ (J. K. Ladha, J. E. Hill, J. M.
Duxbury, R. K. Gupta, and R. J. Buresh, Eds.), pp. 173–195. American Society of
Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Sangakkau, U. K. (1987). Legume for intensification of rice-based farming systems of mid
country Sri Lanka. In ‘‘Food legumes and Improvement for Asian Farming System’’,
pp. 222–223. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Banos, Philippines.
Santiago-Ventura, T., Bravo, M., Daez, C., Ventura, V., Watanabe, I., and App, A. A. (1986).
EVects of N-fertilizers, straw and dry fallow on the nitrogen balance of a flooded soil
planted with rice. Plant Soil 93, 405–411.
Sanyal, B., Mondal, S. S., and Chatterjee, B. N. (1993). Fertilizer management with bulky
organic manure in rice-potato-groundnut sequence for sustaining productivity. J. Pot. Res.
9, 218–227.
Sarkar, A. (1997). Energy-use patterns in sub-tropical rice-wheat cropping under short term
application of crop residue and fertilizer. Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 61, 59–67.
Sarkar, S., Rathore, T. R., Sachan, R. S., and Ghildyal, B. P. (1989). EVect of wheat straw
management on cation status of Tarai soils. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 37, 402–404.
Sass, R. L., Fisher, F. M., Harcombe, P. A., and Turner, F. T. (1990). Methane production and
emission in Texas rice field. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 4, 47–68.
Sass, R. L., Fisher, F. M., Harcombe, P. A., and Turner, F. T. (1991). Mitigation of methane
emission from rice fields: Possible adverse eVects of incorporated rice straw. Global Bio-
geochem. Cycles 5, 257–287.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 401
Savant, N. K., and De Datta, S. K. (1982). Nitrogen transformations in wetland rice soils. Adv.
Agron. 35, 241–302.
Saviozzi, A., Levi-Minzi, R., RiValdi, R., and Vanni, G. (1997). Laboratory studies on the
application of wheat straw and pig slurry to soil and the resulting environmental implica-
tions. Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 61, 35–43.
Scalbert, A. (1991). Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry 30, 3875–3883.
Schomberg, H. H., Ford, P. B., and Hargrove, W. L. (1994a). Influence of crop residues on
nutrient cycling and soil chemical properties. In ‘‘Managing Agricultural Residues’’ (P. W.
Unger, Ed.), pp. 99–121. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
Schomberg, H. H., Steiner, J. L., and Unger, P. W. (1994b). Decomposition and nitrogen
dynamics of crop residues: Residue quality and water eVects. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58,
372–381.
Schutz, H., Holzapfel-Pschorn, A., Conrad, R., Rennenberg, H., and Seiler, W. (1989). A 3-year
continuous record on the influence of daytime, season, and fertilizer treatment on methane
emission rates from an Italian rice paddy. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 16405–16416.
Sekhon, B. S., and Bajwa, M. S. (1993). EVect of organic matter and gypsum in controlling soil
sodicity in a rice-wheat-maize system irrigated with saline waters. Agril. Water Manage 24,
15–25.
Seki, M., Imaizami, M., Imai, K., Kitmura, H., Kato, T., and Shiota, Y. (1989). EVects of
successive applications of rice straw on changes in inorganic components in paddy soil. Res.
Bull. Aichi-Ken Agric. Res. Center 21, 62–68.
Sharma, A. R., and Mittra, B. N. (1990). Response of rice to rate and time of application of
organic materials. J. Agril. Sci. 114, 249–252.
Sharma, A. R., and Mitra, B. N. (1992). Integrated nitrogen management in rice (Oryza sativa)-
wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 62, 70–72.
Sharma, H. L., Modgal, S. C., and Singh, M. P. (1985). EVect of applied organic manure, crop
residues and nitrogen in rice-wheat cropping system in north-western Himalayas. Hima-
chal. J. Agril. Res. 11, 63–68.
Sharma, H. L., Singh, C. M., and Modgal, S. C. (1987). Use of organics in rice-wheat crop
sequence. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 57, 163–168.
Sharma, M. P., and Bali, S. V. (1998). EVect of rice (Oryza sativa) residue management in wheat
yield and soil properties in rice-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian J. Agric.
Sci. 68, 695–696.
Sharma, P. K., and De Datta, S. K. (1985). EVects of puddling on soil physical properties and
processes. In ‘‘Soil Physics and Rice’’, pp. 217–234. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Banos,
Philippines.
Sharma, P. K., and Mishra, B. (2001). EVect of burning rice and wheat crop residues: Loss of N,
P, K and S from soil and changes in nutrient availability. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 49,
425–429.
Sharma, P. K., De Datta, S. K., and Redulla, C. A. (1989). EVect of percolation rate on nutrient
kinetics and rice yield in tropical rice soils. II. Role of straw amendments. Plant Soil 119,
121–126.
Sharma, S. N. (2001). EVect of residue management practices and nitrogen rates on chemical
properties of soil in a rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian
J. Agric. Sci. 71, 293–295.
Sharma, S. N., Singh, S., and Prasad, R. (2001). EVect of crop residue incorporation on the
relative eYciency of diammonium phosphate and Mussoorie rock phosphate in a rice
(Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 71, 77–81.
Shen, Q. R., Xu, S. M., and Shi, R. H. (1993). EVect of incorporation of wheat straw and urea
into soil on biomass nitrogen and nitrogen supplying characteristics of paddy soil. Pedo-
sphere 3, 201–205.
402 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Shiota, V., Sano, K., and Okimura, I. (1984). Short- and long-term eVects of successive
application of rice straw compost evaluated by nitrogen uptake by rice plants. Res. Bull.
Aichi-Ken Agril. Res. Centre 16, 43–51.
Simon, G. (1960). L’enfouissement des pailles dans de sol.-Etude general et repercussions sur la
microflore du sol. Ann. Agron. 11, 5–54.
Singh, G. P., Beri, V., and Sidhu, B. S. (1995). Humification of rice and wheat residues in soil.
J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 43, 17–20.
Singh, H. (1991). EVect of crop residue management on microbial biomass accumulation in the
soil. Curr. Sci. 65, 487–488.
Singh, H., and Singh, K. P. (1995). EVect of plant residue and fertilizer on grain yield of dryland
rice under reduced tillage cultivation. Soil Tillage Res. 34, 115–125.
Singh, M., and Sharma, S. N. (2000). EVect of wheat residue management practices and
nitrogen rates on productivity and nutrient uptake of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum
aestivum) cropping system. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 70, 835–839.
Singh, M., and Singh, T. B. (1991). Influence of organic and inorganic amendments, modified
urea, and application methods on ammonia volatilization in saturated calcareous soil. Int.
Rice Res. Newsl. 16(2), 17–18.
Singh, S., Renu-Batra, Mishra, M. M., Kapoor, K. K., and Sneh-Goyal (1992). Decomposition
of paddy straw in soil and the eVect of straw incorporation in the field on the yield of wheat.
Z. Pflanzen. Bodenk. 155, 307–311.
Singh, Y., Singh, D., and Tripathi, R. P. (1996). Crop residue management in rice-wheat
cropping system. In ‘‘Abstracts of Poster Sessions’’, 2nd International Crop Science Con-
gress, 43. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sistani, K. R., Reddy, K. C., Kanyika, W., and Savant, N. K. (1998). Integration of
rice crop residue into sustainable rice production system. J. Plant Nutrition 21,
1855–1866.
Sisworo, W. H., Mitrosuhardjo, M. M., Rasjid, H., and Myers, R. J. K. (1990). The relative
roles of N fixation, crop residues and soil in supplying N in multiple cropping systems in a
humid, tropical upland cropping system. Plant Soil 121, 73–82.
Skene, T. M., Skjemstad, J. O., Oader, J. M., and Clarke, P. J. (1997). The influence of inorganic
matrices on the decomposition of eucalyptus litter. Aust. J. Soil Res. 35, 73–87.
Smith, J. L., Papendick, R. I., Bezdicek, D. F., Lynch, J. M., and Metting, F. B., Jr. (1992). Soil
organic matter dynamics and crop residue management. In ‘‘Soil Microbial Ecology
Applications in Agricultural and Environmental Management’’ (F. B. Metting, Jr., Ed.),
pp. 65–94. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY.
Smith, S. J., and Sharpley, A. N. (1990). Soil nitrogen mineralisation in the presence of surface
and incorporated crop residues. Agron. J. 82, 112–116.
Somani, L. L., and Saxena, S. N. (1975). EVects of some organic matter sources on nutrient
availability, humus build-up, soil physical properties and wheat yield under field condi-
tions. Ann. Arid Zone 14, 149–158.
Sommers, L. E., Gilmour, C. M., Wildung, R. E., and Beck, S. M. (1981). The eVect of water
potential on decomposition processes in Soils. In ‘‘Water Potential Relations in Soil
Microbiology. ASA Spec. Pub. 9’’ (J. F. Parr, W. R. Gardner, and L. F. Elliott, Eds.),
pp. 97–117. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Sparling, G. P., Shepherd, T. G., and Kettles, H. A. (1992). Changes in soil organic C, microbial
C and aggregate stability under continuous maize and cereal cropping, and after restoration
to pasture in soils from the Manawatu region, New Zealand. Soil Till. Res. 24, 225–241.
Sridevi, S., Katyal, J. C., Srinivas, K., and Sharma, K. L. (2003). Carbon mineralization and
microbialass dynamics in soil amended with plant residues and residue fractions. J. Indian
Soc. Soil Sci. 51, 133–139.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 403
Stevenson, F. J. (1986). ‘‘Cycles of Soil: Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Micronutri-
ents’’. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
Stevenson, F. J., and Kelley, K. R. (1985). Stabilization, chemical characteristics and availability
of immobilized nitrogen in Soils. In ‘‘Nitrogen and the Environment’’ (K. A. Malik, S. H. M.
Naqui, and M. I. H. Aleem, Eds.), pp. 239–259. Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and
Biology, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Stewart, B. A., and Robinson, C. A. (1997). Are agroecosystems sustainable in semi-arid
regions? Adv. Agron. 60, 191–228.
Stott, D. E., and Martin, J. P. (1989). Organic matter decomposition and retention in arid soils.
Arid Soil Res. Rehabil. 3, 115–148.
Sudjadi, M., Putu, I., Widjaja, A. G., and Adiningsih, J. S. (1989). Management of nitrogen to
improve its use eYciency in lowland and upland soils of Indonesia. In ‘‘Nutrient Manage-
ment for Food Crop Production in Tropical Farming Systems’’, pp. 95–107. Int. Rice Res.
Institute, Los Banos, Philippines.
Sumida, H., and Ohyama, N. (1991). The eVects of application of organic matter and calcium
silicate on silica uptake by rice plant. Japanese J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 62, 386–392.
Sur, H. S., Prihar, S. S., and Jalota, S. K. (1981). EVect of rice-wheat and maize-wheat rotations
on water transmission and wheat root development in a sandy loam of the Punjab, India.
Soil Tillage Res. 1, 361–371.
Suyamto, S. (1993). Direct and residual eVect of potassium fertilizer on rice-maize cropping
rotation on Vertisols. Indonesian J. Crop Sci. 8(2), 29–38.
Swarup, A. (1992). EVect of organic amendments on the nutrition and yield of wetland rice and
sodic soil reclamation. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 40, 816–822.
Swift, M. J. (Ed.) 1987. In ‘‘Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: Interregional Research Planning
Workshop’’. Special Issue 13. Biology International, IUBS, Paris, France.
Tamak, J. C., Narwal, S. S., and Singh, S. (1993). EVect of rice residues incorporated in soil on
seedling emergence, growth and yield of lentil (Lens esculanta). Legume Res. 16, 77–78.
Tanaka, A. (1974). Methods of handling of cereal crop residues in Asian countries and related
problems. ASPAC Ext. Bull. 43.
Tanaka, F., and Nishida, M. (1996). Inhibition of nitrogen uptake by rice after wheat straw
application determined by tracer NHþ4 –15N. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 42, 587–591.
Tanaka, F., Ono, S., and Hayasaka, T. (1990). Identification and evaluation of toxicity of rice
root elongation inhibitors in flooded soils with added wheat straw. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 31,
97–103.
Thakur, D. S., and Pandya, K. S. (1997). Response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to nitrogen levels
and pretreated urea in an Inceptisol. Fert. News 42(8), 37–40.
Thakur, K. S., and Singh, M. N. (1987). EVect of organic wastes and N levels on transplanted
rice. Indian J. Agron. 32, 161–164.
Tian, G., and Kolawole, G. O. (1998). Phosphorus availability of rock phosphate incubated
with plant residues with various chemical composition. In ‘‘Abstracts of Papers’’, p. 208.
ASA, CSSA, SSSA.
Tian, G., Brussard, L., and Kang, B. T. (1993). Biological eVects of plant residues with
contrasting chemical compositions under humid tropical conditions—eVects on soil
fauna. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 731–737.
Tian, G., Brussard, L., and Kang, B. T. (1995). An index for assessing the quality of plant
residues and evaluating their eVects on soil and crop in the (sub-) humid tropics. Appl. Soil
Ecol. 2, 25–32.
Tian, G., Kang, B. T., and Brussaard, L. (1992). Biological eVects of plant residues with
contrasting chemical compositions under humid tropical conditions—decomposition and
nutrient release. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 1051–1060.
404 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Timsina, J., and Connor, D. J. (2001). Productivity and management of rice-wheat cropping
systems: Isssues and challenges. Field Crops Res. 69, 93–132.
Tisdall, J. M. (1991). Fungal hyphae and structural stability of soil. Aust. J. Soil Res. 29,
831–835.
Toor, G. S., and Beri, V. (1991). Extent of fertilizer N immobilized by the application of rice
straw and its availability in soil. Bioresource Technol. 37, 189–191.
Vallis, I., and Jones, R. J. (1973). Net mineralization of nitrogen in leaves and leaf litter of
Desmodium intortum and Phaseolus atropupureus mixed with soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5,
391–398.
Valzano, F. P., Greene, R. S. B., and Murphy, B. W. (1997). Direct eVects of stubble burning on
soil hydraulic properties in a direct drill tillage system. Soil Tillage Res. 42, 209–219.
Vamadevan, V. K., Shinde, J. E., Asthana, D. C., and Chakravarty, S. P. (1975). Management
of crop residues. Int. Rice Commission Newsl. 24(1), 53–59.
Vanlauwe, B., Nwoke, O. C., Sanginga, N., and Merckx, R. (1996). Impact of residue quality on
the C and N mineralization of leaf and root residues of three agroforestry species. Plant Soil
183, 221–231.
Verma, S., and Mathur, R. S. (1990). The eVects of microbial innoculation on the yield of wheat
when grown in straw-amended soil. Biol. Wastes 33, 9–16.
Verma, S. M., and Singh, N. T. (1974). EVect of some indigenous inorganic materials on soil
structure. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 22, 220–225.
Verma, T. S., and Bhagat, R. M. (1992). Impact of rice straw management practices on yield,
nitrogen uptake and soil properties in a wheat-rice rotation in northern India. Fert. Res. 33,
97–106.
Vigil, M. F., and Kissel, D. E. (1991). Equations for estimating the amount of nitrogen
mineralized from crop residues. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 757–761.
Vigil, M. F., and Kissel, D. E. (1995). Rate of nitrogen mineralized from incorporated crop
residues as influenced by temperature. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59, 1636–1644.
Villegas-Pangga, G., Blair, G. J., and Lefroy, R. (2000). Measurement of decomposition and
associated nutrient release from straw (Oryza sativa L.) of diVerent rice varieties using a
perfusion system. Plant Soil 223, 1–11.
Vityakon, P., Meepech, S., Cadisch, G., and Toomsan, B. (2000). Soil organic matter and
nitrogen transformation mediated by plant residues of diVerent qualities in sandy acid
upland and paddy soils. Netherlands J. Agril. Sc. 48, 73–90.
Walia, S. S., Brar, S. S., and Kler, D. S. (1995). EVect of management of crop residues on soil
properties in rice-wheat cropping system. Environ. Ecol. 13, 503–507.
Walia, U. S., and Brar, L. S. (2003). ‘‘Weed Management in Rice-Wheat Cropping System’’.
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Wallace, J. M., and Whitehead, L. C. (1980). Adverse synergistic eVects between acetic, pro-
pionic, butyric and valeric acids on the growth of wheat seedling roots. Soil Biol. Biochem.
12, 445–446.
Wang, Y. O., Gao, J. L., Ma, W. P., and Xia, S. X. (1988). The role of wheat straw and maize
straw application in the amelioration of saline wasteland. J. Soil Sci. China 19, 274–275.
Wang, Z., Delaune, R. D., Lindau, C. W., and Patrick, W. H., Jr. (1992). Methane production
from anaerobic soil amended with rice straw and nitrogen fertilizers. Fert. Res. 33, 115–121.
Wang, Z., Zhu, P., Huang, D., Liu, H., and Jiang, L. (2001). Transformation of straw 15N in the
submerged soil. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci. 17, 236–240.
Wardle, D. A. (1995). Impact of disturbance on detritus food-webs in agroecosystems of
contrasting tillage and weed management practices. Adv. Ecological Res. 26, 105–185.
Wassmann, R., Neue, H.-U., Bueno, C., Lantin, R. S., Alberto, M. C. R., Buendia, L. V.,
Bronson, K. F., Papen, H., and Rennenberg, H. (1998). Methane production capacities of
diVerent rice soils derived from inherent and exogenous substrates. Plant Soil 203, 227–237.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 405
Wassmann, R., Neue, H.-U., Lantin, R. S., Buendia, L. V., and Rennenberg, H. (2000a).
Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. 1. Comparison among
field sites in five countries. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. 58, 1–12.
Wassmann, R., Neue, H.-U., Lantin, R. S., Makarim, K., Chareonsilp, N., Buendia, L. V., and
Rennenberg, H. (2000b). Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. 2.
DiVerences among irrigated, rainfed and deepwater ecosystems. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst.
58, 13–22.
Wassmann, R., Wang, M. X., Shangguan, X. J., Xie, X. L., Shen, R. X., Papen, H.,
Rennenberg, H., and Seiler, W. (1993). First records of a field experiment on fertilizer
eVects on methane emission from rice fields in Hunan Province (PR China). Geophys.
Res. Lett. 20, 2071–2074.
Watanabe, A., Katoh, K., and Kimura, M. (1995). Estimation of the increase in methane
emission from paddy soils by rice straw application. Plant Soil 173, 225–231.
Watanabe, F. (1988). EVect of wheat straw application on accumulation of organic acid in
paddy soil and rice growth in early stage. Kyushu Agric. Res. 50, 87.
Watanabe, J. (1989). Increasing fertility with crop residues and green manures. Agri. Hort. 64,
223–228.
Weber, S., Lueders, T., Friedrich, M. W., and Conard, R. (2001). Methanogenic populations
involved in the degradation of rice straw in anoxic paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 38,
11–20.
Whitbread, A., Blair, G., Naklang, K., Lefroy, R., Wonprasaid, S., Konboon, Y., and Suriya-
Arunroj, D. (1999). The management of rice straw, fertilizers and leaf litters in rice
cropping systems in northeast Thailand. Plant Soil 209, 29–36.
Willet, I. R., and Higgins, M. L. (1978). Phosphate sorption by reduced and reoxidized soils.
Aust. J. Soil Res. 16, 319–326.
Witt, C., Cassman, K. G., Olk, D. C., Biker, U., Liboon, S. P., Samson, M. I., and Ottow, J. C. G.
(2000). Initial eVects of crop rotation and residue management on carbon sequestration,
nitrogen cycling and crop productivity of irrigated rice systems. Plant Soil 225, 263–278.
Witt, C., Cassman, K. G., Ottow, J. C. G., and Baker, U. (1998). Soil microbial biomass and
nitrogen supply in an irrigated lowland rice soil as aVected by crop rotation and residue
management. Biol. Fertil. Soils 28, 71–80.
Wu, J. G., Ren, C., Li, H. Z., Geng, Y. H., and Liu, J. F. (1997). The eVects of undecomposed
organic materials on rice yield in paddy soils. J. Jilin Agricultural Univ. 19, 68–73.
Wu, Y. X. (1996). Study on water-soluble organic reducing substances: III. Electrochemical
properties of decomposition products of rice straw and their interactions with variable
charge soils. Pedosphere 6, 167–173.
Xie, C. T., Yan, H. J., and Xa, J. X. (1987). Experiments on improving alkali-saline soil with
organic manures. J. Soil Sci. China 18, 97–99.
Xu, J. (1984). The eVect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the change of nitrogen nutrient in
the highly productive paddy soil in Taihu lake area of Jiangsu Province. J. Soil Sci. China
15, 112–114.
Xu, J. (1987). Annual equilibrium value of carbon and nitrogen in paddy soil in the Taihu Lake
area. J. Soil Sci. China 18, 17–19.
Xu, X. Y., and Yao, X. L. (1988). EVect of organic matter on the physical properties of two
paddy soils. Soils (Turang) 20, 69–174.
Yadav, R. L. (1997). Urea-N management in relation to crop residue recycling in rice-wheat
cropping system in north-western India. Biores. Technol. 61, 105–109.
Yadvinder-Singh, and van Cleemput, O. (1998). EVect of diVerent organic materials and urea
fertilizer on methane emission from two Soils. In ‘‘Proc. Agro-environmental Issues and
Future Strategies towards 21st Century’’ (J. K. Syal, M. Y. Bhatti, and S. M. Azeemi,
Eds.), pp. 49–53. University of Agriculture, Faislabad, Pakistan.
406 YADVINDER-SINGH ET AL.
Yadvinder-Singh, Bijay-Singh, Ladha, J. K., Khind, C. S., Gupta, R. K., Meelu, O. P., and
Pasuquin, E. (2004a). Long-term eVects of integrated management of organic inputs on
yield and soil fertility in the rice-wheat rotation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. (in press).
Yadvinder-Singh, Bijay-Singh, Ladha, J. K., Khind, C. S., Khera, T. S., and Bueno, C. S.
(2004b). Effects of residue decomposition on productivity and soil fertility in rice-wheat
rotation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 854–864.
Yadvinder-Singh, Bijay-Singh, Maskina, M. S., and Meelu, O. P. (1988). EVect of organic
manures, crop residues and green manure (Sesbania aculeata) on nitrogen and phosphorus
transformations in a sandy loam at field capacity and under waterlogged conditions. Biol.
Fertil. Soils 6, 183–187.
Yadvinder-Singh, Khind, C. S., and Bijay-Singh (1991). EYcient management of leguminous
green manures in wetland rice. Adv. Agron. 45, 135–189.
Yadvinder-Singh, Ladha, J. K., Bijay-Singh, and Khind, C. S. (1994a). Management of nutrient
yields in green manure systems. In ‘‘Green Manure Production Systems For Asian Rice
Fields’’ (J. K. Ladha and D. P. Garrity, Eds.), pp. 125–154. Int. Rice Res. Institute, Los
Banos, Philippines.
Yadvinder-Singh, Malhi, S. S., Nyborg, M., and Beauchamp, E. G. (1994b). Large granules,
nests or bands: Method of increasing eYciency of fall applied urea for small grains in North
America. Fert. Res. 38, 61–87.
Yagi, K., and Minami, K. (1990). EVect of organic matter application on methane emission
from some Japanese paddy fields. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 36, 599–610.
Yagi, K., and Minami, K. (1991). Emission and production of methane in the paddy fields of
Japan. J. Agric. Res. Quart. 25, 165–171.
Yagi, K., Tsuruta, H., and Kanda, K. (1994). EVect of water management on methane emission
from rice paddy fields. Res. Rep. Div. Environ. Planning Nat. Inst. Agro-Environ. Sci. 10,
61–70.
Yamagata, M., Ae, N., and Otani, T. (1996). Nitrogen uptake response of crops to organic
nitrogen. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 67, 345–353.
Yan, F., Schubert, S., and Mengel, K. (1996). Soil pH changes during legume growth and
application of plant material. Biol. Fertil. Soils 23, 236–242.
Yodkeaw, M., and De Datta, S. K. (1989). EVects of organic matter and water regime on the
kinetics of iron and manganese in two high pH rice soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 35,
323–335.
Yoneyama, T., and Yoshida, T. (1977a). Decomposition of rice residue in tropical soils. 1.
Nitrogen uptake by rice plants from straw incorporated, fertilizer (ammonium sulfate) and
soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 23, 33–40.
Yoneyama, T., and Yoshida, T. (1977b). Decomposition of rice residue in tropical soils. 3.
Nitrogen mineralization and immobilization of rice residue during its decomposition in soil.
Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 23, 175–183.
Yoneyama, T., Lee, K. K., and Yoshida, T. (1977). Decomposition of rice residues in tropical
soils. 4. The eVect of rice straw on nitrogen fixation by heterotrophic bacteria in some
Philippine soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 23, 287–295.
Yoo, I. D., Kimura, M., Wada, H., and Takai, Y. (1990). The release of organic and inorganic
nutrients from soil-surface-applied rice straw and its contribution to biological N2 fixation.
Japanese J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 61, 579–585.
Yoon, S. K., Gilmour, J. T., and Wells, B. R. (1975). Micronutrient levels in the rice plant leaf as
a function of soil solution concentration. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 39, 685–688.
Yoshida, T., Kai, H., and Harada, T. (1973). The harmful eVect of ammonium ion on the
mineralization and accumulation of organic matter in soil. J. Faculty Agri. Kyushu Univ. 17,
227–246.
CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 407
Zech, W., Sensi, N., Guggenberger, G., Kaiser, K., Lehmann, J., Miano, T. M., Mitner, A., and
Schroth, G. (1997). Factors controlling humification and mineralization of soil organic
matter in the tropics. Geoderma 79, 117–161.
Zhiqiang, G., Jun, Y., Guoyuan, M., and Fawang, G. (1999). EVects of tillage and mulch
methods on soil moisture under wheat fields of Loess Plateau, China. Pedosphere 9,
161–168.
Zhu, H. X., and Yao, X. L. (1996). Influence of organic materials on some physical properties of
paddy soils. Soils 28, 38–41.
Zhu, X. Q., Wang, W. Z., Wang, M., and Liu, H. (1988). EVects and techniques of burying
wheat straw in rice-wheat double cropping system. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci. 4(3), 19–23.
Zia, M. S., Munsif, M., Aslam, M., and Gill, M. A. (1992). Integrated use of organic manures
and inorganic fertilizers for the cultivation of lowland rice in Pakistan. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.
38, 331–338.