advancements in modern startle response systems

34
Advancements in Modern Startle Response Systems Sponsored by:

Upload: insidescientific

Post on 31-Jul-2015

237 views

Category:

Science


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Advancements in Modern Startle Response Systems

Sponsored by:

InsideScientific is an online educational environment designed for life science researchers. Our goal is to aid in

the sharing and distribution of scientific information regarding innovative technologies, protocols, research

tools and laboratory services.

Advancements in Startle Reflex: An in-depth discussion on piezo/Plexiglas sensors versus load cell sensors

Michael Kinder

President, CEO

Kinder Scientific Company

VP Business Development

OtoScience Labs

Copyright 2015 Michael Kinder, Kinder Scientific and InsideScientific. All rights reserved.

Thank you to our event sponsor

Open Field

Cage Rack

Pulse Maze

Rotometer

Light / Dark

Startle Reflex

Forced Swim

Active / Passive Avoidance

Tail Suspension

Cue and Contextual Fear Conditioning

Place Preference

Learning Hole board

Kinder Scientific - Behavioral System Core

Today’s discussion

1. A history of piezo/Plexiglas sensing assemblies and why it’s time to move on: • What does it actually measure

• Is it a true accelerometer?

• Strengths & Weaknesses of the design

2. The applicability of Load Cell sensors: • Strengths &Weaknesses

The high speed videos in this presentation have been provided by:

Alexander Galazyuk, Ph.D.

Associate Professor Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology

Northeast Ohio Medical University

We are very grateful for Alex’s generosity and stunning quality

of work that he and Ryan Longenecker demonstrated in the creation of these videos.

What measure are we after ?

A Whole Body Reflex from a loud noise!

For over 20 years the piezo/Plexiglas sensing assembly was the dominant method for measuring startle responses Much of the science on startle reflex stands on the shoulders of this technique.

How the piezo/Plexiglas sensor works

Spring alone (no energy)

Subject’s mass Subject’s mass + Response

• Because the Plexiglas plate is a spring, the signal coming off the piezo necessarily contains the spring characteristics

• This adds significant and sometimes confounding complexity to analyzing the data

• The design requires some method of centering the subjects downward force over the piezo

• It is important to understand that the piezo is the transducer, not the sensor. The entire assembly is the sensor (or sensor assembly)

How the piezo/Plexiglas sensor works

Piezo glued to plate and sealed

Platform legs Plexiglas plate

Subject reflex response

• Animal mass preloads the spring of the Plexiglas plate

• Think if this as stored energy what will be released back into the data

How the piezo/Plexiglas sensor works

Plexiglas/Piezo Sensor

Animal Mass

• When the animal startles, the Plexiglas spring is now loaded with the animal mass + the startle response

• This is why the second positive peak can be larger than the first

How the piezo/Plexiglas sensor works

Subject reflex response bends the plate

Plexiglas/Piezo Sensor

Early Waveforms…25 years ago

Graph of – 115d20msHabit @ Trial 8

• This early approach provides only the absolute values and makes it very difficult to know what is actually happening from a study of the waveform.

Early Improvements to Full Wave Signal!

Graph of – 115d20msHabit @ Trial 8 • This is the exact

animal data from the previous slide.

• It is clear that the “spring” is oscillating

• And the sensing assembly is not faithfully following the animal response

• What does the output of the sensing assembly actually represent?

– The combination of the response and the spring!

• Is it truly an accelerometer?

– No! this is a misnomer. It is more of a kinetic energy measurement.

• Does the animal weight matter?

– Yes! Dampens Spring

• Can it be properly calibrated?

– Possibly, but with great difficulty.

Has the piezo/Plexiglas sensor outlived its usefulness?

Calibrating the piezo/Plexiglas sensor – or is it only equilibrating? • The piezo transducer produces a DC voltage analogous to the

amount of bend it experiences.

• However, because it bleeds off the signal so quickly, it only outputs a value when the plate is in motion. Likely here is where some of the confusion over being an accelerometer. But the voltage it creates is not analogous to acceleration but instead change in

distance (bend).

• Calibration - verb (used with object), calibrated, calibrating. 1. to determine, check, or rectify the graduation of (any instrument giving quantitative measurements).

• Because we are trying to measure the force exuded by the animal, “calibrating” in volts is not actually calibrating. The best we can hope for in this approach is “equilibration”, i.e., making the sensors from multiple stations produce the same output value for a known input force.

Equilibrating

Equilibrating the piezo/Plexiglas sensor with an eccentric vibrating motor

Challenges & weaknesses with an eccentric vibrating motor

1. The frequency difference between the Plexiglas plate and the revolutions of the motor cause inconsistent forces to occur. They beat against each other.

2. Makes it difficult to calibrate to a standard unit of force such as Newton.

3. Because the animal weight has a significant effect on the spring characteristics of the sensor, one would need a calibrator for each animal weight equal to the animal weight. Therefore, it is not practical to pursue true calibration, but rather, accept equilibration as the goal.

4. It is difficult to prove linearity

1. We are stuck with using arbitrary units such as volts or just a number or…

2. We can link the performance of the plate to a Newton with a single pulse solenoid that is calibrated on a NIST traceable apparatus. Still, this does not accurately tie the unit of measure to Newton because of the effect of the animal weight.

3. This is why you should not compare raw amplitudes of different weight animals, or even the same animal at different ages when using a piezo/Plexiglas sensing assembly. Not apples and apples, but rather apples and oranges.

Piezo/Plexiglas Sensors…

Moving to the next level

Load Cell Sensor Assembly

Strengths:

• Faithfully follows the animal response

• Easy static calibration with fixed weights (easily made NIST traceable)

• Easy to prove linearity

• Ability to compare responses of different weight subjects

Weaknesses:

• More expensive to manufacture

Load Cell Sensor

Faithfully follows

response

Post Session Trial Retrace with Load Cell Sensor

• Note the response from the system is very similar to the video. The negative peak is a result of the mass of the restrainer

0.0

4.0N

It’s about the data!

The Purpose of Nostim Trials

Is this the right question?

What is the purpose of Nostim (no stimulus) trials?

What was the subject doing during these times?

• What was the subject doing just prior to startle elicitation?

• That is what should determine the validity of the trial.

Evaluating pretrial activity

0.0

8.0N

0.0

8.0N

Dual Analysis Windows

• Each trial can be automatically evaluated for pre-startle activity?

Window A Window B

0.0

8.0N

Dual Analysis Windows

Window A

1. Determine True Pre-startle activity in the first window

2. Accurately set the second window for the first positive response

Window B

Final Thoughts

• Dr. Alexander Galazyuk’s publication in the Journal of Neuroscience Methods “An improved approach to separating startle data from noise”

• Pay close attention to how your system is calibrated or equilibrated and know the difference between the two. Make sure to continually convince yourself that your system is recording the same response for a known input. It is one of the most overlooked area of startle research.

• Ask yourself if comparing startle amplitudes of different size animals matters to you and decide accordingly

Thank You!

For additional information on startle response systems, sensor technologies, and best practices for calibration and protocol design, please visit:

http://www.kinderscientific.com

Michael Kinder

[email protected]

(858) 679-1515

Follow us on

Join our group

InsideScientific is an online educational environment designed

for life science researchers.

Our goal is to aid in the sharing and distribution of scientific

information regarding innovative technologies, protocols, research

tools and laboratory services.