advanced emergency braking system / lane departure warning system
DESCRIPTION
Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System. Informal document No . GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008 Agenda item 4(a). OICA POSITION. Summary. Data: EU, F, J. Scope and justifications for a future UNECE regulation. Requirements for AEBS. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Advanced Emergency Braking System
/Lane Departure Warning
System
OICA POSITION1
Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008Agenda item 4(a)
Summary
2
Data: EU, F, J
Scope and justifications for a future UNECE regulation
Requirements for AEBS
Requirements for LDWS
Organization of the work
Fatalities and Serious Injuriesby Vehicle Category (EU19)
3
60,0%
16,2%
5,5%
15,6%
2,2%0,5%
HCV
Light vehicles
Cat L vehicles
Bikes
Pedestrians
Others
16,1%
47,3%
8,3%
5,4%
10,3%
12,7%
PLVL2RMVéloPiétonAutre
Light vehicles mainly collide with each other
Heavy commercial vehicles mainly
collide with light vehicles
Source: CARE, EU19 in 2006 (LAB)
Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one light vehicle
Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one heavy commercial vehicle
When 1 HCV involved, nearly ½ of all serious injuries and fatalities occur in light vehicles.
Accidents Caused by Large Trucksby Accident Type (Japan)
4Source: Macro Accident Data Japan 2005
When 1 HCV involved, more than ½ of all accidents are rear-end accidents
43,7%
19,0%
23,0%
14,3%
Others
Front-rear
Head on
Front-lateral5
Fatalities and Serious Injuriesby Accident Type (France)
10,6%
28,9%
47,0%13,5%
Others
Front-rear
Head on
Front-lateral
Source: BAAC, France in 2007 (LAB)
The part of front-rear accidents is nearly the
double for HCV compared to light vehicles
Conclusions about available data:The efficiency of one given AEBS/LDWS varies according to the vehicle category (slide 3)
The efficiency of a system potentially preventing front-rear accidents is nearly the double on a HCV compared to a light vehicle (slides 4 & 5)
Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one light vehicle
Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one heavy commercial vehicle
Current Situation forAdvanced Vehicle Systems
6
No safety need for rulemaking whenvoluntarily fitted
Advanced Vehicle Warning Systems already exist on a
few vehicles
Warning Systems
Safety is ensured by CEL Annex of UNECE
R13/13H and R79
Advanced Vehicle Active Systems already exist on a
few vehicles (acting on braking or steering)
Active (intervening) Systems
With regard to existing regulations, additional rulemaking has the only purpose to align the provisions if
the systems are fitted or required.
Installation of AEBS/LDWS
7
Scope proposed by EC:"Vehicles in Categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 shall be equipped with an AEBS/LDWS which shall meet the requirements of this Regulation."
Timeframe proposed by EC:
29 October 2013 for New Types29 October 2015 for New Registrations
In order not to waste time and resources, future UNECE Regulations on AEBS and LDWS should be “if fittedif fitted” requirements based on the scope proposed by OICA and the timeframe for
mandatory installation proposed by EC.
EU is the first region to require installation of AEBS and LDWS on some categories
Mileage data helps defining the relevant scope
8
0
500.000.000
1.000.000.000
1.500.000.000
2.000.000.000
2.500.000.000
3.000.000.000
3.500.000.000
4.000.000.000
4.500.000.000
5.000.000.000
35
01
bis
40
00
40
01
bis
50
00
50
01
bis
60
00
60
01
bis
70
00
70
01
bis
75
00
75
01
bis
80
00
80
01
bis
90
00
90
01
bis
10
00
0
10
00
1b
is1
20
00
12
00
1b
is1
40
00
14
00
1b
is1
60
00
16
00
1b
is1
80
00
18
00
1b
is2
00
00
20
00
1b
is2
20
00
22
00
1b
is2
40
00
24
00
1b
is2
60
00
Gross vehicle mass (kg)
Mileag
e x
Nu
mb
er
of
veh
icle
s (
km
)
N2, 3,5t to 12t N3, > 12t
Fahrleistungen (Annahme)> 12t 135.000 km7 - 12t 60.000 km< 7t 17.000 km
Average vehicle mileage:> 12 tonnes : 135.000 km/year7 – 12 tonnes: 60.000 km/year< 7 tonnes: 17.000 km/year
Source: VDA 2007
Gross Vehicle Mass (kg)
Mil
eage
x q
uant
ity
of v
ehic
les
(km
)
Implementation of new UNECE Regulation
9
The systems are the most efficient on the following categories:
M3 Class II and III, > 12 t 4 x 2 and 6 x 2
(exception for M3G)
and
N3 > 16 t 4 x 2 and 6 x 2
(exception for N3G)
A reasonable limitation of the scope is also necessary to respect the EU time frame
Should the installation be unavoidable,
OICA recommends to
limit the scope to these categories
Requirements for AEBS
10
This regulation to be separated from LDWS
Aim: Collision avoidance Aim: Collision mitigation/reduction
Some systems already available
Currently no specific regulation
No need to regulate categories where system
is not required
Avoid unnecessary packaging
AEBS to be introduced into a new UNECE
regulationKeep legal flexibility
for non EU CPs
Requirements for LDWS
11
This regulation to be separated from AEBS
Aim: lane keep and change assist
Aim: warning only
Some systems already available
Currently no specific regulation
No need to regulate categories where system
is not required
UNECE R79 covers active systems
LDWS to be introduced into a new UNECE
regulationKeep legal flexibility
for non EU CPs
• October 2013 for New Types• October 2015 for New Registration
Organization of work
12
• Time frame for development of the new regulation should be compatible with the introduction dates
• Content of the regulation should be compatible with the introduction dates
• One informal working group is sufficient
EU dates
Time frame
Content
Optimization of the resources