adsorption of nitroxide spin probes at the ...ps24/pdfs/adsorption of nitroxide spin probes … ·...

5
Reprinted from LANGMUIR, 1989, 5, 490. Copyright @ 1989 by the American Chemical Society and reprinted by permission of the copyright owner. Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes at the AluminaJCyclohexane Interface in the Presence of Aerosol OT Christophe A. Malbrel,t P. Somasundaran,..t and Nicholas J. Tuno. Langmuir Center lor Colloids and Interlaces, Henry Krumb School of Mines, and Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027 Received May 31, 1988. In Final Form: December 29, 1988 Electron spin resonance bas been recently applied 00the study of adsorbedsurfactant structures in aqueous solution. The extension of this technique to apolar media requires an accurate understanding of the absorption behavior of the nitroxide probes used in this type of investigation and of their interactions with the adsorbed species. In this study. adsorption on alumina in cyclohexane was carried out for two types of nitroxide probes: Tempo derivatives (hydroxy and amino) and n-doxylstearic acids (n = 5, 7,12, 16). All probes were found to adsorb on the mineral surface, but the addition of a surfaCtant, Aerosol OT, was found to affect the probe adsorption significantly. While the adsorbed layer of Aerosol OT solubilized the Tempo probes, it did not affect the adsorption of the 5- and 7-doxylstearic acids. Importantly, the molecular conf"tgUrationof the 12- and 16-doxylstearic was found to be highly sensitive to the amount of surfactant adsorbed on the mineral. It is suggestedthat the configuration of these probes depends upon the surface pressure developed on the solid surface by the adsorbed surfactant species. has beenextendedto the study of adsorbed polymers and surfactants. Information was obtained on the fluidity profile in the adsorbed layer of dodecyl sulfate at the alumina/water interface by using doxylstearic acids probes. 16 Similarly, studies conductedwith spin-labeled polymers haveallowedestimationof the train-to-loop ratio of the adsorbedpolymer chain and adsorbedlayer thick- ness.17 For successful FER investigationof interface structures, the selection of proper probes is a critical step. Two questions must be answeredfor the results to be mean- ingful: (1) Does the probe modify the adsorption char- acteristics of the adsorbate? (2) Can the information on Introduction The conformation of moleculesat the solid/liquid in- terface is of primary importance in understanding many interfacial processes such as aggregation/dispersion of colloidal suspensions, a phenomenon that controls the qQa1ity of pigment dispersionsused as inks and paints,l and is important in magnetic tape processing2 and in the cosmeticindustry.3 Structural features of molecules ad- sorbedat interfaces are alsoimportant in determining the efficiency of industrial processes such as flotation,4 en- hanced oil recovery,5 waste water treatment,6 and lubri- cation.7 Among the methods used for studying the ad- sorbed surfactant layer, conventional adsorption experi- ments have yielded valuable basic information on the surfacecoverage by the adsorbates on various solids. On the basis of this information,molecular conformations have been postulated. For example, in their work on the ad- sorption of various fatty acids on different substrates,8 Kipling et al. concluded on the orientation of the major axis of the molecule relative to the substrate surface. Adsorptionexperiments are particularly useful in providing information on the adsorbed surfactant layer at low surface coveragewhen they are coupled with other analytical methods such as electrophoresis,s bulk ion concentration determination,10 or microcalorimetry.ll However,certain changes in the adsorbedlayer structure, especially those involVing modifications at the molecular level, are not directly detected by adsorption experiments. The mo- lecular configuration of polymers and surfactants is af- fected by their physicochemicalenvironment (pH, ionic strength in aqueous solutions, nature of the solvent, presence of water in the case of nonpolarsuspension). New methods are needed to follow in situ conformational changes of the surfactant molecules as their environment, especially at interfaces, is modified. Recently, electron spin resonance spectroscopy(ESR) hasbeenusedto investigate the structure of the adsorbed layers in aqueous suspensions at a molecular scale.12 Developed for microenvironmental studies of biological membranes13 or membrane-mimetic systemssuch as mi- celles14 or reversemicelles,15 the spin-probing technique (1) McKay, R. B. In Interfacial Phenomenain Apol4r Media; Sur- factant Science SeriesVol 21; Eicke, H. F., Parfitt, G. D., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1987; p 361. (2) Hudson. G. F.; Raghavan, S.; Roylance, D. A. In Surface and Colloid Science in Computer Technology; MittaI. K. L., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, 1987;p 61. (3) Fox, C.1n Surfactants in Cosmetics; Surfactant Science Series Vol 16; Rieger, M M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1985; p 401. (4) Fuerstenau, M. C.; Miller, J. D.; Kuhn, M. C. In Chemiltry of Flotation; A.LM.E.: New York, 1985. (5) Somaaundaran, P.; Chandar, P. In Solid-Liquid Interactiana in POroul Media; C_, J. M., Ed.; Technip: PariS, 1985; P 411. (6) Gregory, J. In Flocculation, Sedimentation and CoMolidatian; Moudgil. B. M., 8omaIUndar8n. P., Eds.;AIChE: New York, 1!MJ6; P 125. (7) Brieooe, B.; Tabor, D. In Interfacial Phenomena in Apolar Media; Eicke, H. F., Parfitt, G. D., Eda.;Marcel Dekker: New York, 1987; p 327. (8) Kipling, J. J.; Wright, E. H. M. J. Chern.Soc. 1964,3535.. (9) So_~l!d,,"-1"8D, P.; Healy,T. W.; Fuerstenau. D. W. J. PhYB. Chern. 1 "4, 68, 3562- (10) Harwen. J. H.; Schechter,R.; Wade, W. H. In Solid-Liquid In- teractions in Porous Media; C_, J. M., Ed.; Technip: PariS, 1985;P 371. (11) Partyka, S.; Lindheimer, M; Zaini, S.; Brun, B.1n Solid-Liquid Interactiona in Porous Media; Cases, J. M., Ed.; Technip: Paris, 1985; p 509. (12) Watennan, K. C.; Turro, N. J.; Chandar, P.; Somaaundaran, P. J. Phy.. Chern. 1986, 90, 6830. (13) Delvaux,P. F.1n BiolOlical Magnetic Re80nance; Berliner, L. J.; Reuben,J.IL, Eda,i Plenum Pre88; New York, 1983iP 183, (14) Berliner, L. J. In Spin Labelling 1: Theory and Applicationa; Academic Press: New York, 1979. (15) Barelli, A.; Eicke. H. F. Langmuir 1986,2,780. (16) Chandar, P.; Somaaundaran, P.; Waterman, K. C.; Turro, N. J. J. Phys. Chern. 1987,91.150. (17) (a) Hommel, H.; Legrand, A. P.; Balard. H.; Papirer, E. Polymer 19M, 2,;, 1297. (b) Sakal. H.; Fujlmort, T.; Imamura, T. BulL C1U!m. Soc. ,-- ..-oft ~.. " t I-angmuir Center for Colloids and Interfaces. t nft~ft"""ftM. ~.. {"'ft~;~._.

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes at the ...ps24/PDFs/Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes … · determination,10 or microcalorimetry.ll However, certain changes in the adsorbed

Reprinted from LANGMUIR, 1989, 5, 490.Copyright @ 1989 by the American Chemical Society and reprinted by permission of the copyright owner.

Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes at theAluminaJCyclohexane Interface in the Presence of

Aerosol OT

Christophe A. Malbrel,t P. Somasundaran,..t and Nicholas J. Tuno.

Langmuir Center lor Colloids and Interlaces, Henry Krumb School of Mines, and Departmentof Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027

Received May 31, 1988. In Final Form: December 29, 1988

Electron spin resonance bas been recently applied 00 the study of adsorbed surfactant structures in aqueoussolution. The extension of this technique to apolar media requires an accurate understanding of theabsorption behavior of the nitroxide probes used in this type of investigation and of their interactions withthe adsorbed species. In this study. adsorption on alumina in cyclohexane was carried out for two typesof nitroxide probes: Tempo derivatives (hydroxy and amino) and n-doxylstearic acids (n = 5, 7,12, 16).All probes were found to adsorb on the mineral surface, but the addition of a surfaCtant, Aerosol OT, wasfound to affect the probe adsorption significantly. While the adsorbed layer of Aerosol OT solubilizedthe Tempo probes, it did not affect the adsorption of the 5- and 7-doxylstearic acids. Importantly, themolecular conf"tgUration of the 12- and 16-doxylstearic was found to be highly sensitive to the amount ofsurfactant adsorbed on the mineral. It is suggested that the configuration of these probes depends uponthe surface pressure developed on the solid surface by the adsorbed surfactant species.

has been extended to the study of adsorbed polymers andsurfactants. Information was obtained on the fluidityprofile in the adsorbed layer of dodecyl sulfate at thealumina/water interface by using doxylstearic acidsprobes. 16 Similarly, studies conducted with spin-labeledpolymers have allowed estimation of the train-to-loop ratioof the adsorbed polymer chain and adsorbed layer thick-ness.17

For successful FER investigation of interface structures,the selection of proper probes is a critical step. Twoquestions must be answered for the results to be mean-ingful: (1) Does the probe modify the adsorption char-acteristics of the adsorbate? (2) Can the information on

IntroductionThe conformation of molecules at the solid/liquid in-

terface is of primary importance in understanding manyinterfacial processes such as aggregation/dispersion ofcolloidal suspensions, a phenomenon that controls theqQa1ity of pigment dispersions used as inks and paints,land is important in magnetic tape processing2 and in thecosmetic industry.3 Structural features of molecules ad-sorbed at interfaces are also important in determining theefficiency of industrial processes such as flotation,4 en-hanced oil recovery,5 waste water treatment,6 and lubri-cation.7 Among the methods used for studying the ad-sorbed surfactant layer, conventional adsorption experi-ments have yielded valuable basic information on thesurface coverage by the adsorbates on various solids. Onthe basis of this information, molecular conformations havebeen postulated. For example, in their work on the ad-sorption of various fatty acids on different substrates,8Kipling et al. concluded on the orientation of the majoraxis of the molecule relative to the substrate surface.Adsorption experiments are particularly useful in providinginformation on the adsorbed surfactant layer at low surfacecoverage when they are coupled with other analyticalmethods such as electrophoresis,s bulk ion concentrationdetermination,10 or microcalorimetry.ll However, certainchanges in the adsorbed layer structure, especially thoseinvolVing modifications at the molecular level, are notdirectly detected by adsorption experiments. The mo-lecular configuration of polymers and surfactants is af-fected by their physicochemical environment (pH, ionicstrength in aqueous solutions, nature of the solvent,presence of water in the case of nonpolar suspension). Newmethods are needed to follow in situ conformationalchanges of the surfactant molecules as their environment,especially at interfaces, is modified.

Recently, electron spin resonance spectroscopy (ESR)has been used to investigate the structure of the adsorbedlayers in aqueous suspensions at a molecular scale.12Developed for microenvironmental studies of biologicalmembranes13 or membrane-mimetic systems such as mi-celles14 or reverse micelles,15 the spin-probing technique

(1) McKay, R. B. In Interfacial Phenomena in Apol4r Media; Sur-factant Science Series Vol 21; Eicke, H. F., Parfitt, G. D., Eds.; MarcelDekker: New York, 1987; p 361.

(2) Hudson. G. F.; Raghavan, S.; Roylance, D. A. In Surface andColloid Science in Computer Technology; MittaI. K. L., Ed.; PlenumPress: New York, 1987; p 61.

(3) Fox, C.1n Surfactants in Cosmetics; Surfactant Science Series Vol16; Rieger, M M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1985; p 401.

(4) Fuerstenau, M. C.; Miller, J. D.; Kuhn, M. C. In Chemiltry ofFlotation; A.LM.E.: New York, 1985.

(5) Somaaundaran, P.; Chandar, P. In Solid-Liquid Interactiana inPOroul Media; C_, J. M., Ed.; Technip: PariS, 1985; P 411.

(6) Gregory, J. In Flocculation, Sedimentation and CoMolidatian;Moudgil. B. M., 8omaIUndar8n. P., Eds.; AIChE: New York, 1!MJ6; P 125.

(7) Brieooe, B.; Tabor, D. In Interfacial Phenomena in Apolar Media;Eicke, H. F., Parfitt, G. D., Eda.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1987; p 327.

(8) Kipling, J. J.; Wright, E. H. M. J. Chern. Soc. 1964,3535. .(9) So_~l!d,,"-1"8D, P.; Healy, T. W.; Fuerstenau. D. W. J. PhYB. Chern.

1 "4, 68, 3562-(10) Harwen. J. H.; Schechter, R.; Wade, W. H. In Solid-Liquid In-

teractions in Porous Media; C_, J. M., Ed.; Technip: PariS, 1985; P371.

(11) Partyka, S.; Lindheimer, M; Zaini, S.; Brun, B.1n Solid-LiquidInteractiona in Porous Media; Cases, J. M., Ed.; Technip: Paris, 1985;p 509.

(12) Watennan, K. C.; Turro, N. J.; Chandar, P.; Somaaundaran, P.J. Phy.. Chern. 1986, 90, 6830.

(13) Delvaux, P. F.1n BiolOlical Magnetic Re80nance; Berliner, L. J.;Reuben, J.IL, Eda,i Plenum Pre88; New York, 1983i P 183,

(14) Berliner, L. J. In Spin Labelling 1: Theory and Applicationa;Academic Press: New York, 1979.

(15) Barelli, A.; Eicke. H. F. Langmuir 1986,2,780.(16) Chandar, P.; Somaaundaran, P.; Waterman, K. C.; Turro, N. J.

J. Phys. Chern. 1987,91.150.(17) (a) Hommel, H.; Legrand, A. P.; Balard. H.; Papirer, E. Polymer

19M, 2,;, 1297. (b) Sakal. H.; Fujlmort, T.; Imamura, T. BulL C1U!m. Soc.,-- ..-oft ~.. "

t I-angmuir Center for Colloids and Interfaces.t nft~ft"""ftM. ~.. {"'ft~;~._.

Page 2: Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes at the ...ps24/PDFs/Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes … · determination,10 or microcalorimetry.ll However, certain changes in the adsorbed

Adsorption of Nitro%ide Spin Probes Langmuir, Vol. 5, No. 2,1989 .91

(J) ""'~~~'~\':f~' cooo

~

OH

~I0 ~(0)

VV"'I"""'~~'A~ '+

(5) V,~~,,'VVV'-

COOH

E,0~

~ax..

(~<~v~~./'V~/'"",-Figure 2. &SR spectra of 4-hydroxy- Tempo coadsorbed withdifferent amounts of Aerosol OT on alumina in cyclohexane.

cOmt

Figure 1. Nitroxide spin probe stzuctures: (1) 4-hydroxy-Tempo;(2) .-amino-Tempo; n-doxylatearic acids with n c 5 (3), n = 7(.), n c 12 (5), and n - 16 (6). umperature. Both supernatant and 8ediJnent were used for the

~R experiments.The Aerosol OT was analyZed by a two-phale titration tech-

nique where the surfactant is titrated against hexadecyltri-methylammonium bromide in cbloroformwith dimidium bromidedisulfIDe blue as the end point indicator.

the probe environment given by its ~R spectra be usedas a true representation of the environment constitutedby the adsorbed molecules?

Nitroxide spin probes have been widely used in nonpolarmedia to study the structure of reverse micelles and W 10microemuiaions, but we are unaware of reports of theirbehavior at the solid/nonpolar liquid interface. Fur-thermore, the use of this technique to study the physico-chemical characteristics of the adsorbed layer requires agood understanding of the interactions between theseprobes and the coadsorbed surfactant species. In thispeper, we reJX}rt ~ults obtained for two types of nitroxideprobes at the alumina/ cyclohexane interface and on theeffects of the addition of a commonly used surfactant,Aerosol OT. The nitroxide probes ch~n are 4-hydroxy-and 4-amino-Tempo (Tempo = 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidinyi-l-oxy) and several doxyistearic acids (positionsof the nitroxide free radical on the stearic acid alkyl chain:5, 7, 12. and 16) (Figure 1). The use of Tempo derivativeswas B\Uested by the extensive literature available on theseprobes, which have been often selected to investigate thestructure of AOT reverse micelle and W /0 microemulaionsin nonpolar solvent.18 The doxylstearic acids offer theunique possibility of collecting data profiles within thesurfactant layer in reverse micelles 8.8 well as in the ad-sorbed state by monitoring the signal of the nitroxideradical in various positions along the alkyl chain of thestearic acid molecules.

Experimental SectionMaterial-. The alumina used in the p~nt mMiy was of 99~

purity (Linde A grade. Union Carbide Corp.). The ~cle .izewas 0.3 ,.m. and the Bgf lurrace area was specified to be 15 ml/ gby nitrocen adsorption. All the nitroxide spin probes werepW'chaled from Aldrich Chemical Co. and used as received.Cyclobexane obtained from Fjsher Scientific Co. was of certifiedACS grade. The aoIvent was dUtilled and stored on MolecularSieve 4A to avoid contamination by water. The .urfactant tiled.Aerosol CYr (sodium bia(2-ethylhexyl) 8ulf~te) was obtainedfrom Fisher Scientific Co. and was purified according to thep~ure described in the literature.lt

Sample PreparatloD. Sampl. were prepared by adding 15cml of cyclohexane aolutionof ACYr containiDI approximatively10-6 mol/L of the probe to 1 g of alumina previously desiccatedat 200 °C for 4 h and allowed to cool in a desiccator connectedto a vacuum pump using P sOl u desiccant. The luspension wasronditioned for 24 h with a wrist shaker before being centrifuged.

Method.. The ESR spectra were obtained with a Varian E9X-band apectrometer at a modulation frequency of 100 kHz usinga quartz capillary wile. All experiments wen performed at room

Results and DiscussionAdsorption of Tempo Derivatives at the Alumi-

najCyclohexane Interface. Analysis of the anisotropicfeatures of the ~R spectra provides information on therotational mobility of the nitroxide probe from which probeenvironment characteristics can be deduced. An isotropicspectrum characterized by a sharp three-line spectra isobtained when the nitroxide is tumbling in a nonviscousfluid. Immobilization of the probe leads to a line broad-ening and to a spectrum that has lost most of its details.If the molecule rotates slowly, an intermediate spectrumis obtained.

Changes in the ~R line shapes of the Tempo deriva-tives were studied as a function of the concentration ofcoadsorbed surfactant. When no AOT was added to thesuspension, the probe was found to adsorb completely onthe alumina surface. In this case, the spectrum obtainedfor the 4-hydroxy- Tempo (Figure 2) is typical of the probein a "frozen stateW. Similar results were obtained with4-amino- Tempo. The line broadening observed shows thatrotational reorientations are not fast enough to average outanisotropies and that the rotational motion of the probeis strongly hindered by the presence of the solid surface.Since the hyperfine splitting constant A.l cannot be readilymeasured on this type of highly anisotropic spectrum,calculation of the empirical order parameter S (propor-tional to the difference in the hyperfine splitting constantAI - A .l13) is not a simple procedure. Accurate quantifi-cation of the probe mobility from its ~R spectrum wouldrequire a complete simulation of the spectrum. However,detection of modifications in 2A1 usually provides mean-ingful information, due to the fact that a decrease in AIimplies a decrease in S and an increase in probe mobility.Furthermore, comparison of these changes with similarchanges obtained by using experimental conditions atwhich molecular conformations and probe environment arewell-known provides another way to obtain additional in-formation on the probe environment and its effect on the~R lineshape of the molecUle.

1. Effect of Surfactant Addition. When the sur-factant is added to the suspension, it coadsorbs with thenitroxide probe on the solid surface, affecting the mobilityof the latter, a phenomenon that can readily be observedvia the ~R technique. As the concentration of the sur-factant is increased, AI decreases (Figure 2). This resultis a clear indication that the probe mobility increases,suggesting that the probe molecule is SQlubilized inw the~..-" '_~-L" ~- ~. . - -

(18) (a) Lim. Y. Y.; Fendler, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1178, 100,7490.(b) YCMhiob. H.; Kazama, s. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1183, ~, 240.

(19\ Kluh... A .T. Ph- rill... ,~ I:Q 9'7AA

Page 3: Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes at the ...ps24/PDFs/Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes … · determination,10 or microcalorimetry.ll However, certain changes in the adsorbed

492 Langmuir, Vol. 5, No.2, 1989 Malbrel et aL

'"~

~

~ aL~~

50;-+

0 I 10 100 1000

WIT~T TIfoE WITH AIR. min

Figure 5. Variation of 2A. with the time of contact of the solidwith air before the addition of the Aerosol OT solution ([AOT]= 5 X 10--3 kM/m3).

SI.O.

"51 ~.OM.. «1.0-

~.O~ :11.0.

m.o,

~.a

~ 15.0

110.0

5.0t . .. .~0.00.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 ~.O ~.O :11.0 ~.O ~.O

RESIDUAL CONC£NTRA"noN. /,;,3 .10-3

Figure 3. Equilibrium adsorption iaotherm of Aeroeol OT onalumina incyclobeune.

~"""'~~

{MIT].

~..~ ~

"'"""

~ ..;..I ;;.-,

30lIl-' ~ (

Figure 6. ESR spectra of 5- and 16-doxylstearic acid solubilizedin cyclohexane with different AOT concentrations: 0.5 x 10"" and5 x 10-3 kM/m3 are respectively below and above the surfactantcmc.

Figure 4. ~R spectrum of 4-hydroxy-Tempo adsorbed (a) onheat-treated alumina and (b) on as-received alumina.

isotherm of AOT on alumina in cyclohexane. The aff"mityof the surfactant for the alumina surface is rather highsince the maximum absorption is reached before any re-sidual surfactant concentration is detected in the super-natant. (Using a specific surface area of 15 m2jg for thealumina and a parking area of 70 A2 for the AOTmolecule,the maximum adsorption was found to correspond to themonolayer coverage.) Above the surfactant concentrationcorresponding to the monolayer coverage, the excess AOTremains in solution to form reverse micelles where the spinprobe is also solubilized. Preferential partitioning of thenitroxide probe into the reverse micelles is apparentlyfavored since the ESR signal of the supernatant does be'-come increasingly stronger as the surfactant residualconcentration in the supernatant increases.

2. Effect of Water on the Probe Mobility. The ESRresponse of the 4-hydroxy-Tempo was found to be verysensitive to the presence of water adsorbed on the aluminasurface. The spectra obtained with the dehydrated alu-mina and with the alumina used as received were markedlydifferent (Figure 4). The spectral anisotropy observedwith the desiccated mineral was much larger (higher AI)than when tl1e mineral was used without any pretreatment.The role postulated for the water present on the ''asreceived" alumina surface was COnIlrmed by leaving thedesiccated alumina exposed to air for different intervalsprior to the addition of the surfactant solution. In Figure?, th? hy~~fin~ spl!tti~g .cons~nt.~I. i~ plotted ~ .a

air (containing moisture). The line broadening observedat low water content decreases as the contact time withair is increased, indicating a change in the probe envi-ronment due to an increase in the amount of water ad-sorbed from the air on the mineral surface. Eventually,the mobility of the probe reaches a limiting value, whichcorresponds to the spectral anisotropy observed for theuntreated alumina. These results COnIlrm that the asreceived alumina contains adsorbed water which evapo-rates during the heating step but readsorbs when thesample is left in air.

Behavior of II -Doxylstearic Acids in the Alumi-na/ AOT /Cyclohexane System. Doxylstearic acidprobes offer the unique possibility to collect informationon structure profiles within the surfactant layer in reversemicelles as well as in the adsorbed state.12,16 Figure 6 showsESR spectra of 5- and IG-doxylstearic acid probes solu-bilized in cyclohexane in the presence of various amountsof surfactant. It can be seen that the spectral anisotropyvaries with both the position of the nitroxide radical onthe alkyl chain of the stearic acid molecule and the sur-factant concentration. In Figure 7, the peak ratio ho/ h_1is plotted as a function of surfactant concentration for. - - - -- .

Page 4: Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes at the ...ps24/PDFs/Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes … · determination,10 or microcalorimetry.ll However, certain changes in the adsorbed

Adsorption 01 Nitroxide Spin Probes Langmuir, Vol. 5, No.2, 1989 493

&.~;~S

(~)""'~ -- -

..8-,..,

~

---

~

AJ\""!k""/~'

~

v

~

~

~v

Figure 8. ESR spectra of 5- and 16-doxylstearicacid probescoadsorbed on alumina with various amounts of AOT. Theconcentrations shown are the initial ones. An initial AOT con-centration of 0.5 X 10-3 kMjm3 gives incomplete surface coveragewith no surfactant left in the s~rnatant; 5 X 10-3 kMjm3leadsto a monolayer coverage with a micellar supernatant solution.

(1) (2)

",\""""""""b""""""".. """"" "" """'~"""'" "" ~"""

fJ:)0.J::.;::" "\t .;;:::~ ~ .::,.

~,~~, ~,~~,~ ~~~~~~[~~Figure 9. Effect of surfactant adsorption on the conformationof (I) the5-doxylstearic acid molecule and (2) the 16-doxylstearicacid molecllie adsorbed on alumina.

conilguration. This hypothesis is in agreement with theresults of Cadenhead et at on the 12-doxylstearic acidconfiguration in a monolayer of dipalmitoyllecithin at thewater I air interface.20

peak-to-peak line width being identical for all these probes,changes in the rotational correlation time of the probe areproportional to changes in the peak ratio ho/ h_1 <ho andh-l are respectively the heights of the central line and ofthe high field line). The use of the concept of the rota-tional correlation time as a measure of the probe mobilityis justified only when the probe rotational motion may beconsidered as isotropic, an assumption valid in the caseof doxylstearic acids in solution, even in the presence ofsurfactant. When the nitroxide free radiCal is very closeto the polar head (5-doxylstearic acid), the spectral an-isotropy increases sharply above the surfactant cmc (forAOT in cyclohexane, cmc = 1.35 X 10-3 kM/m3). Thisobservation allows one to draw the conclusion that thestearic acid probe carrier is integrated into the reversemicelle, affecting the probe environment. No change inspectral anisotropy is observed with the 16-doxylstearicacid, suggesting that, although the probe carrier isinte-grated into the reverse micelles, the nitroxide free radiCalremains outside the surfactant shell of the micelle, becausethe length of the AOT molecule is equivalent to only aboutnine caroon-carbon bonds.

Figure 8 shows the spectra obtained for cases where thevarious doxylstearic acid probes are coadsorbed on thealumina surface with various amounts of coadsorbedsurfactant. For the 5-doxylstearic acid, the spectra arecharacteristic of the probe in a frozen state, irrespectiveof the coadsorbed surfactant concentration. A similarphenomenon was observed with the 7-doxylstearic acid.This poor probe motion in these cases suggests that theprobe is close to the surface, even when the coadsorbedAOT molecules cover the whole surface. The spectra ob-tained for 16-doxylstearic acid (Figure 8) and for 12-do~c acid show the nitroxide inafrozen state whenno surfactant is present. But, as the surfactant is added,a progressive shift toward an increased mobility is ob-served. This result may be interpreted as follows: at lowsurface coverages, interactions between the nitroxideradical of the 12- and 16-doxylstearic acids and the aluminasurface lead to a bent con1lgUration of the probe at whichthe rotational motion of the nitroxide is hindered, givinga characteristic frozen spectrum. These interactions arenot strong enough to resist the "surface pressure" generatedby the adSorbed surfactant as the concentration of coad-sorbed surfactant increases. Under these conditions, thenitroxide probe is pushed away from the surface,allowinJ{

ConclusionsAdsorption of various nitroxide probes on alumina in

cyclohexane was studied by ~R. The effect of surfactantaddition on the adsorption of the probes and their ESRresponse was investigated. Tempo derivatives and n-doxylstearic acids were found to adsorb on alumina whenno surfactant was added to the system. The ~R spectraobtained in this case indicated that the rotational motionof the probes was hindered by the presence of the surface,suggesting that the nitroxide free radiCals were close to thesolid surlace, in the case of all probes, including n-doxylstearic acids.

When Aerosol OT was added to the suspension, thebehavior of the two types of probes differed. The decreasein spectral anisotropy observed for the Tempo derivativesshows the mobility of the probe to increase, possibly dueto solubilization of the probe in the adsorbed surfactant

-~~~

(')t\\ "'~_ft"_.1 n .. V -""ft. Q ~. T. ~..."ft- T --.1- . D:_..J.,:-

Page 5: Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes at the ...ps24/PDFs/Adsorption of Nitroxide Spin Probes … · determination,10 or microcalorimetry.ll However, certain changes in the adsorbed

494

to the surfactant concentration.Changes in the ESR line shape of the n-doxylstearic

acids were used in this investigation to monitor differencesin the adsorption behavior of the n-doxylstearic acids whensurfactant is added to the system. When the probe wasadsorbed on alumina, the ESR response was found todepend upon the position of the nitroxide free radical Thenitroxide probe is pulled away from the alumina surfaceby the adsorbed surfactant only in the case of the 12- and16-doxylstearic acids. It is suggested that the strength ofnitroxidejalumina interaction depends upon the positionof the spin probe along the alkyl chain of the carriermolecule.

layer. When the intensity of the ESR signal was used as,a qualitative indicati~n o~ the probe concentration and the

~urfactant concentration m the supernatant was measured,'the result suggested that the probe stays preferentially inthe adsorbed surfactant layer as long as the AOT con-centration in the supernatant is not high enough to formmicelle. When reverse micelles were present in the sur-rounding solution, the probe was preferentially solubilizedinto the micelles. Under adsorption conditions, the probewas found to be sensitive also to the presence of water onthe alumina surface.

The behavior of the n-doxylStearic acids (n = 5, 7, 12,and 16) in the presence of surfactant was found to dependon the position of the nitroxide radical on the stearic acidalkyl chain. When the probe was close to the polar headof the carrier molecule (n = 5 and 7), ESR was able todetect the presence of AOT reverse micelles. When thefree radical was away frOm the carboxylic end of the carriermolecule (n = 12 and 16), it was found to be less sensitive

Acknowledgment. We thank K. C. Waterman and P.Chandar for many helpful and stimulating discussions. Weacknowledge the rmancial support of NSF MSM-86-17183(C.A.M. and P .S.), of ARO (N.J. T .), and of I.B.M. (P .S.and N.J.T.).