adoptive immunotherapy of human cancer using low-dose … · low-dose ril-2 and lak cell cancer...

5
(CANCER RESEARCH 48, 5007-5010, September 1, 1988] Adoptive Immunotherapy of Human Cancer Using Low-Dose Recombinant Inter leukin 2 and Lymphokine-activated Killer Cells1 Deric D. Schoof, Barbara A. Gramolini, David L. Davidson, Anthony F. Massaro, Richard E. Wilson, and Timothy J. Eberlein2 Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 ABSTRACT The adoptive transfer of recombinant-methionyl human interleukin 2 (rIL-2)-activated autologous peripheral blood mononuclear lymphokine- activated killer (LAK) cells to cancer patients is being evaluated as an alternative to conventional cancer therapy. We have independently de veloped an alternative regimen to previously reported adoptive ¡niimino- therapy protocols using rIL-2 and LAK cells which features the prolonged administration of low-dose rIL-2 (30,000 units/kg) and an automated, entirely enclosed system of peripheral blood cell procurement, culture, harvest, and reinfusion of activated cells. The cell culture system was tested with a murine tumor model in which LAK cells generated in plastic culture bags were reinfused into tumor-bearing mice. Tumor regression was as effective with cells activated ¡n the bags as in conventional culture flasks. Twenty-eight cancer patients were treated for 5 consecutive days with low-dose rIL-2, followed by leukapheresis, infusion of LAK cells, and prolonged IL-2 administration. At least 50% tumor regression was observed in 46% of all patients treated. These data imply that human peripheral blood mononuclear cells retain fully their capacity for rIL-2- induced activation and effector cell function under this alternative ap proach, and further, that a low-dose rIL-2 regimen with markedly reduced toxicities can be as effective as high-dose rIL-2 regimens if low-dose rlL- 2 is given for a prolonged period of time following LAK cell infusion. INTRODUCTION The report of Grimm (1) first described the remarkable ability of IL-23 to induce in resting PBMC an antigen-nonspecific cytotoxicity uniquely different from NK activity. PBMC acti vated with IL-2 have been designated LAK cells and include as effectors, T-cells, non-T-cells, as well as potentiated NK activ ity, and, in the mouse, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (2-4). Several cancer research centers have instituted clinical protocols designed to exploit this unique observation for the treatment of certain tumors (5, 6). Each protocol requires that cancer patients be subjected to systemic administration of rIL-2 and a series of consecutive leukaphereses and PBMC activation with rIL-2, each step, subject to microbial contamination. In addition, this generic approach imposes on the patient rIL-2-induced, dose-limiting side effects of vascular leak, hypotension, and significant mental status changes as well as dermatológica! changes (7, 8). The present protocol attempts to address some of these problems by reducing the dose of rIL-2 while prolonging the length of rIL-2 administration following LAK cell infusion. We report the clinical results of 28 patients treated on a low-dose protocol using rIL-2-activated PBMC which were collected, cultured, and harvested using a closed, automated system. Received 10/13/87; revised 2/29/88; accepted 5/26/88. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1This work is supported in part by NIH Grant CA40555. 2 Recipient of an American Cancer Society Career Development Award. To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Department of Surgery, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. 3 The abbreviations used are: IL-2, interleukin 2; LAK, lymphokine-activated killer; rIL-2, recombinant-methionyl human interleukin 2 (ala 125); PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; NK. natural killer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Low-Dose rIL-2 Protocol. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained from cancer patients admitted to the Brigham and Women's Hospital Clinical Research Center following informed con sent. Twenty-eight patients with évaluable tumor and no other thera peutic options were treated on a 19-day protocol. During Wk 1, the patients received 14 doses of rIL-2 (Ala 125; Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, Raritan, NJ) at a dose of 30,000 units/kg every 8 h. After a 2-day hiatus the patients underwent leukapheresis for 5 consecutive days. Following the leukapheresis on Day 12 the patient received the cells obtained on Days 8 and 9 along with rIL-2 every 8 h. Cells obtained on Day 10 were infused on Day 13, and cells obtained on Days 11 and 12 were reinfused on Day 15. rIL-2 was continued every 8 h through Day 19 for a total of 23 scheduled doses. Measurement of all évaluable tumor nodules was performed before and 2 wk and 6 wk after completion of the protocol. A complete response was scored if all measurable tumors disappeared. A partial response to treatment was scored if the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all the measurable lesions decreased by more than 50%. If the decrease in tumor measurement was less than 50% but greater than 25%, a minor response was scored. One patient was retreated, yielding a total of 29 treatment courses. Leukapheresis. Vascular access was accomplished by antecubital venipuncture, or if necessary, central venous lines with double- or single- lumen catheters. Leukapheresis was also successfully accomplished using a single peripheral vein by adapting the software to accommodate an intermittent, or discontinuous flow procedure following the same protocol used for mononuclear cell collection. Mononuclear cells were collected on a Fenwal CS-3000 continuous flow blood cell separator (Fenwal Laboratories, Deerfïeld,IL). Closed system apheresis software, with preattached transfer packs, 1-liter bags of both 0.9% sodium chloride and acid citrate dextrose (Solution A), and two butterfly needles, was utilized to reduce the risk of bacterial contamination to the patient and to the cultured cells. Erythrocytes, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, platelets, and plasma were returned to the patient through another antecubital line. After 10 liters of peripheral blood were proc essed, the contents of the collection container consisted of 200 ml of plasma plus platelets and of a pellet containing platelets and mononu clear cells. The pellet was resuspended by manual agitation and centri fuged for 3 min at 1000 rpm to separate the platelet-rich plasma from the mononuclear pellet. The platelet-rich plasma was siphoned into a clean transfer pack and reinfused to the patient. None of the patients experienced any adverse reactions requiring discontinuation of the procedure, and there was no evidence of infection in any of the cell cultures or at the venipuncture site. The mononuclear cells that remained in the collection bag were then processed using a closed, automated protocol. The cells were resus pended by agitation without the addition of saline. Three hundred ml of Ficoll (lymphocyte separation medium; Litton Bionetics, Charleston, SC) were aseptically transferred to a 600-ml transfer pack and con nected to the apheresis software via the injection site on the component- rich plasma line. Ficoll was underlaid at 4 ml/min without centrifuga- tion to establish a density gradient until the collection container was full. The centrifuge was started, and the supernatant plasma and plate lets were collected into a waste bag until cells appeared in the super natant line. Cells were then diverted into an empty transfer pack, and processing was continued until all of the Ficoll was used. The residue in the collection bag was washed out and directed to a waste bag. The purified PBMC were resuspended in 400 ml of normal saline, returned to the collection bag within thes centrifuge chamber, and washed with 1 liter of normal saline. The PBMC were resuspended to 200 ml and 5007 on May 9, 2020. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Upload: others

Post on 10-May-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Adoptive Immunotherapy of Human Cancer Using Low-Dose … · LOW-DOSE rIL-2 AND LAK CELL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY transferred to a cell culture bag (PL 732 tissue culture flask, 330 cm2,

(CANCER RESEARCH 48, 5007-5010, September 1, 1988]

Adoptive Immunotherapy of Human Cancer Using Low-Dose RecombinantInter leukin 2 and Lymphokine-activated Killer Cells1

Deric D. Schoof, Barbara A. Gramolini, David L. Davidson, Anthony F. Massaro, Richard E. Wilson, andTimothy J. Eberlein2

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

ABSTRACT

The adoptive transfer of recombinant-methionyl human interleukin 2(rIL-2)-activated autologous peripheral blood mononuclear lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells to cancer patients is being evaluated as analternative to conventional cancer therapy. We have independently developed an alternative regimen to previously reported adoptive ¡niimino-therapy protocols using rIL-2 and LAK cells which features the prolongedadministration of low-dose rIL-2 (30,000 units/kg) and an automated,entirely enclosed system of peripheral blood cell procurement, culture,harvest, and reinfusion of activated cells. The cell culture system wastested with a murine tumor model in which LAK cells generated in plasticculture bags were reinfused into tumor-bearing mice. Tumor regressionwas as effective with cells activated ¡nthe bags as in conventional cultureflasks. Twenty-eight cancer patients were treated for 5 consecutive dayswith low-dose rIL-2, followed by leukapheresis, infusion of LAK cells,and prolonged IL-2 administration. At least 50% tumor regression wasobserved in 46% of all patients treated. These data imply that humanperipheral blood mononuclear cells retain fully their capacity for rIL-2-induced activation and effector cell function under this alternative approach, and further, that a low-dose rIL-2 regimen with markedly reducedtoxicities can be as effective as high-dose rIL-2 regimens if low-dose rlL-2 is given for a prolonged period of time following LAK cell infusion.

INTRODUCTION

The report of Grimm (1) first described the remarkable abilityof IL-23 to induce in resting PBMC an antigen-nonspecific

cytotoxicity uniquely different from NK activity. PBMC activated with IL-2 have been designated LAK cells and include aseffectors, T-cells, non-T-cells, as well as potentiated NK activity, and, in the mouse, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity(2-4). Several cancer research centers have instituted clinicalprotocols designed to exploit this unique observation for thetreatment of certain tumors (5, 6).

Each protocol requires that cancer patients be subjected tosystemic administration of rIL-2 and a series of consecutiveleukaphereses and PBMC activation with rIL-2, each step,subject to microbial contamination. In addition, this genericapproach imposes on the patient rIL-2-induced, dose-limiting

side effects of vascular leak, hypotension, and significant mentalstatus changes as well as dermatológica! changes (7, 8). Thepresent protocol attempts to address some of these problemsby reducing the dose of rIL-2 while prolonging the length ofrIL-2 administration following LAK cell infusion. We reportthe clinical results of 28 patients treated on a low-dose protocolusing rIL-2-activated PBMC which were collected, cultured,and harvested using a closed, automated system.

Received 10/13/87; revised 2/29/88; accepted 5/26/88.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment

of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1This work is supported in part by NIH Grant CA40555.2 Recipient of an American Cancer Society Career Development Award. To

whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Brigham and Women's

Hospital. Department of Surgery, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.3The abbreviations used are: IL-2, interleukin 2; LAK, lymphokine-activated

killer; rIL-2, recombinant-methionyl human interleukin 2 (ala 125); PBMC,peripheral blood mononuclear cell; NK. natural killer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Low-Dose rIL-2 Protocol. Human peripheral blood mononuclearcells were obtained from cancer patients admitted to the Brigham andWomen's Hospital Clinical Research Center following informed con

sent. Twenty-eight patients with évaluabletumor and no other therapeutic options were treated on a 19-day protocol. During Wk 1, thepatients received 14 doses of rIL-2 (Ala 125; Ortho PharmaceuticalCorporation, Raritan, NJ) at a dose of 30,000 units/kg every 8 h. Aftera 2-day hiatus the patients underwent leukapheresis for 5 consecutive

days. Following the leukapheresis on Day 12 the patient received thecells obtained on Days 8 and 9 along with rIL-2 every 8 h. Cellsobtained on Day 10 were infused on Day 13, and cells obtained onDays 11 and 12 were reinfused on Day 15. rIL-2 was continued every8 h through Day 19 for a total of 23 scheduled doses. Measurement ofall évaluabletumor nodules was performed before and 2 wk and 6 wkafter completion of the protocol. A complete response was scored if allmeasurable tumors disappeared. A partial response to treatment wasscored if the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diametersof all the measurable lesions decreased by more than 50%. If thedecrease in tumor measurement was less than 50% but greater than25%, a minor response was scored. One patient was retreated, yieldinga total of 29 treatment courses.

Leukapheresis. Vascular access was accomplished by antecubitalvenipuncture, or if necessary, central venous lines with double- or single-lumen catheters. Leukapheresis was also successfully accomplishedusing a single peripheral vein by adapting the software to accommodatean intermittent, or discontinuous flow procedure following the sameprotocol used for mononuclear cell collection. Mononuclear cells werecollected on a Fenwal CS-3000 continuous flow blood cell separator(Fenwal Laboratories, Deerfïeld,IL). Closed system apheresis software,with preattached transfer packs, 1-liter bags of both 0.9% sodiumchloride and acid citrate dextrose (Solution A), and two butterflyneedles, was utilized to reduce the risk of bacterial contamination tothe patient and to the cultured cells. Erythrocytes, polymorphonuclearleukocytes, platelets, and plasma were returned to the patient throughanother antecubital line. After 10 liters of peripheral blood were processed, the contents of the collection container consisted of 200 ml ofplasma plus platelets and of a pellet containing platelets and mononuclear cells. The pellet was resuspended by manual agitation and centrifuged for 3 min at 1000 rpm to separate the platelet-rich plasma fromthe mononuclear pellet. The platelet-rich plasma was siphoned into aclean transfer pack and reinfused to the patient. None of the patientsexperienced any adverse reactions requiring discontinuation of theprocedure, and there was no evidence of infection in any of the cellcultures or at the venipuncture site.

The mononuclear cells that remained in the collection bag were thenprocessed using a closed, automated protocol. The cells were resuspended by agitation without the addition of saline. Three hundred mlof Ficoll (lymphocyte separation medium; Litton Bionetics, Charleston,SC) were aseptically transferred to a 600-ml transfer pack and connected to the apheresis software via the injection site on the component-rich plasma line. Ficoll was underlaid at 4 ml/min without centrifuga-tion to establish a density gradient until the collection container wasfull. The centrifuge was started, and the supernatant plasma and platelets were collected into a waste bag until cells appeared in the supernatant line. Cells were then diverted into an empty transfer pack, andprocessing was continued until all of the Ficoll was used. The residuein the collection bag was washed out and directed to a waste bag. Thepurified PBMC were resuspended in 400 ml of normal saline, returnedto the collection bag within thes centrifuge chamber, and washed with1 liter of normal saline. The PBMC were resuspended to 200 ml and

5007on May 9, 2020. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 2: Adoptive Immunotherapy of Human Cancer Using Low-Dose … · LOW-DOSE rIL-2 AND LAK CELL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY transferred to a cell culture bag (PL 732 tissue culture flask, 330 cm2,

LOW-DOSE rIL-2 AND LAK CELL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY

transferred to a cell culture bag (PL 732 tissue culture flask, 330 cm2,

1000 ml; Fenwal Laboratories) which was transported to the laboratory.Cell Culture. A portion of washed PBMC were aseptically removed

from the transfer pack and counted by trypan blue exclusion (GibcoLaboratories, Grand Island, NY). PBMC were suspended in RPMI-1640 (Whittaker, M. A. Bioproducts) supplemented with 2% GroupAB serum, 50 units/ml of penicillin, 50 Mg/ml of streptomycin, 2 mML-glutamine, and 1000 units/ml of rIL-2. Cells and media were distributed into bags at a predetermined optimal density of 3 x IO6cells/mlusing a computerized auxiliary pump (Model SAV-EX2; Fenwal Laboratories) placed in a laminar flow hood. Bags were incubated at 37°C

in 5% CO2 without agitation. In some experiments PBMC were cultured in roller bottles at a predetermined optimal density of 1.5 x IO6cells/ml and were incubated at 37°Cin 5% COi with rotation. After 3

to 4 days of incubation, plastic bag cultures were harvested and washedwith the CS-3000. Cells were suspended in 200 ml of saline and 5%albumin (Massachusetts Public Health Biological Laboratories, Boston,MA) and received 75,000 units of rIL-2 before filtration (Model 4C2100blood-component recipient set; Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Deerfield,IL).

Assessment of Cell Activation. Cells were evaluated at the end of theincubation period for LAK activity against the lymphoma cell lineDaudi (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) and freshfrozen colon tumor targets. Natural killer cell activity was tested againstthe erythroleukemia K562 (American Type Culture Collection). Targetcells were labeled with 5'Cr (200 iiCi; Du Pont NEN Research Products,Boston, MA) for 60 min at 37°C,washed with RPMI-1640, andincubated for an additional 30 min at 37°C.Target cells (5 x 103/well)were incubated with various numbers of effector cells for 4 h at 37°C.

The supernatant was collected with the supernatant collection system(Skatron, Inc., Sterling, VA). Samples were counted in a gammacounter (Gamma Trac 1191; TM Analytic, Elk Grove Village, IL).Results were converted to percent specific release.

% release = 100 x Cpm (test) ~ «P»"(background)cpm (total) —cpm (background)

In Vivo Evaluation of Murine LAK Cell Activity. Murine LAK cells,generated in tissue culture bags or tissue culture flasks (75-cm2 culture

flask; Becton Dickinson Labware, Oxnard, CA), were compared for theability to mediate the regression of a lethal challenge of tumor usingthe murine MCA 105 fibrosarcoma model (9-11). C57BL/6 mice (TheJackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were given 4 x 10s tumor cellsi.v. Concurrently, syngeneic spleen cells were cultured at 3 x IO6cells/ml in RPMI-1640 plus 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco) and 1000 units/ml of rIL-2 (10) in either bags or tissue culture flasks. Three days laterthe LAK cells were harvested, and 10" cells were adoptively transferredi.v. into tumor recipients along with i.p. rIL-2 (50,000 units, every 8 hfor 5 days). Fourteen days after tumor injection, mice were killed. Theirlungs were insufflated with 15% India ink and preserved in Fekete's

solution (12) for subsequent enumeration. Multiple pairwise comparisons of treatment groups were made with Bonferroni's inequality (13).

RESULTS

Evaluation of Tumor Cell Killing by LAK Cells Generated inClosed Culture Conditions. The characteristics of humanPBMC, processed in an enclosed system of peripheral bloodcell procurement, culture, and harvest, were assessed by measuring parameters such as cell yield, cytotoxicity against NK-resistant and NK-sensitive cell lines, fresh heterologous tumor,and cell surface phenotype, against conventional roller bottlecultures (14) of the same cell population. In agreement withothers (15, 16) we found no significant difference in rIL-2-induced PBMC cytotoxicity between cells cultured and harvested using the automated bag system and conventional rollerbottles (a representative experiment is shown in Table 1). Therewere no significant differences in any of the other parametersbetween cells cultured in roller bottles or cells cultured in bagsat a variety of cell densities (from 1 x 10* cells/ml to 3 x IO6

Table 1 Comparison of LAK cytotoxicity generated in 1-liter bags and rollerbottles against allogeneic fresh tumor

PBMC were cultured in roller bottles or bags for 3 days in 1000 units/ml ofrlL-2 and tested for cytotoxicity against tumor cell lines and FT-1, a freshcolorectal tumor.

TumortargetDaudiK562FT-1CulturevesselBag

RB*Bag

RBBag

RB%

of specificrelease84

7990

853020

" RB, roller bottle.

cells/ml) and harvested using the enclosed automated system(data not shown).

Evaluation of Murine Micrometastases in Response to Treatment with rIL-2 and LAK Cells Generated in Bags or Flasks.We adopted the murine MCA 105 pulmonary micrometastasesmodel to compare the ability of LAK cells generated in thetissue culture bags or culture flasks to mediate the regressionof tumor in vivo. A representative experiment is shown in whichmice given injections of a single-cell suspension of MCA 105developed extensive pulmonary tumor nodules by Day 14 (Fig.1). Mice treated with rIL-2 alone had significantly fewer tumornodules than controls. In contrast, mice treated with LAK cellsin conjunction with rIL-2 had significantly less tumor thanuntreated and rIL-2-treated controls. However, pairwise comparison of the number of pulmonary métastasesin treatmentgroups which received LAK cells plus rIL-2 uncovered nosignificant difference in tumor elimination by LAK cells generated in bags or flasks (Table 2).

Characteristics of Human LAK Cells Grown in Bags. Thetotal numbers of cells infused and lytic units/IO7 cells for all

patients, as well as for responders and nonresponders, areshown in Table 3. While both of these parameters were higherfor the responders, the differences were not statistically significant. LAK cells grown in bags demonstrated a high degree ofcytotoxicity against Daudi, fresh tumor, and K562 after activation with rIL-2. Thus, significant numbers of LAK cells forinfusion, possessing a high degree of cytotoxicity, were obtainedusing the automated bag system.

Regression of Evaluable Metastatic Disease in the HumanUsing LAK Cells Grown in Bags. Twenty-eight patients wereévaluable,and 1 patient was retreated, yielding a total of 29treatment courses. The distribution of responders according todiagnosis is shown in Table 4. Of the 28 initial treatmentcourses, 13 of the patients had responses exceeding 50%, anoverall response rate of 46%. Of these 13 patients, 4 hadcomplete responses (complete disappearance of all known met-astatic disease). The first was a 44-yr-old male with retroperi-toneal lymphoma causing bowel and biliary obstruction. Histumor mass at the start of the protocol measured 22 cm in theretroperitoneum and 18 cm in the pelvis. At follow-up laparot-omy 1 mo posttreatment, all of the tumor was entirely destroyed, and the patient's pelvis was entirely normal. The second complete response was seen in a 44-yr-old female withovarian carcinoma who had progressive disease, even after i.v.and then i.p. chemotherapy. At the time of entrance on theLAK cell protocol, the patient had extensive peritoneal anddiaphragmatic disease as well as an increasing serum level ofCAI25 antigen. Following completion of the protocol, herCAI25 antigen level decreased and was normal by 1 mo post-treatment. At 6 wk, she underwent a laparoscopy and biopsy ofall suspicious areas. All biopsies were negative except for one

5008on May 9, 2020. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 3: Adoptive Immunotherapy of Human Cancer Using Low-Dose … · LOW-DOSE rIL-2 AND LAK CELL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY transferred to a cell culture bag (PL 732 tissue culture flask, 330 cm2,

LOW-DOSE rIL-2 AND LAK CELL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY

Fig. 1. These are resected lungs from micegiven injections of equal numbers of MCA 105tumor cells. To provide contrast with the whitetumor nodules, the lungs were insufflated withIndia ink. I, control (no treatment): B, treatment with rlL-2 alone; C, treatment with rlL-2 + LAK cells generated in tissue cultureflasks; D, treatment with rIL-2 + LAK cellsgenerated in plastic bags. **«

Table 2 Effects of culture vessel on LAK cell activation and elimination ofestablished pulmonary tumor

Mice in each group (5 to 7/group) received 4 x 10s MCA 105 tumor cells i.v.

Lungs were harvested 14 days later, and the number of tumor nodules was countedin a blind fashion.

Av no. of métastases

GroupA"

BCDCellsNone

NoneLAK, flaskLAK, bagrIL-2

Exp.1144

+ 72+ 8+ 12Exp.

2250

2353553Exp.

3250

ND*

10181

" Pairwise comparison (Bonferroni's inequality) between Groups A and B. Aand C, A and D, B and C. and B and D is statistically significant (/' < 0.05).Pairwise comparison between Groups C and D is not significant.

* ND, not determined.

Table 3 Summary of cell culture data

All patients Responders NonrespondersNo. of cells infused"LU/107 cells'

4.3 ±2.4°

1,037 ±9064.9 ±2.5

1,042 ±9743.8 ±2.2

1,018 ±843•Number of cells infused (x 10'°).* Mean ±SD.' LU, lytic unit; a lytic unit is defined as the number of cells required to obtain

40% specific lysis.

Table 4 Distribution of responden by diagnosis

DiagnosisRenal

cellMelanomaColorectalLymphomaOvarianSarcomaRenal (retreatment)Responders/total

treated5/105/9"

0/42/3'1/1«

0/11/1°

" Complete responder lasting 4+ mo, 2 mo, 5+ mo. and 9+ mo, respectively.

small microscopic focus of tumor on the serosa of small bowelcompletely surrounded by a dense fibrotic response. The thirdcomplete responder presented with bilateral axillary métastasesfrom a melanoma. All of his axillary disease has disappearedsince treatment with rIL-2/LAK. The other nine patients showing partial responses manifest these responses as follows: inliver and lung (melanoma, renal cell, renal cell); lymph nodes(lymphoma, renal cell, melanoma); bone (renal cell); subcutaneous tissue (melanoma, renal cell). The duration of responsewas from one to greater than 8 mo. One patient with pulmonarymétastasesfrom a renal cell cancer had a partial response afterone treatment and was retreated. Now, more than 9 mo following his retreatment, he has no evidence of pulmonary métastases

Table 5 Characteristics ofrespondersDiagnosisRenalRenalRenalRenalRenalMelanomaMelanomaMelanomaMelanomaMelanomaLymphomaLymphomaOvarianRenal

(retreatment)Site

ofdiseaseLiverLungLymph

nodes,retroperitoneumScalp,boneLung,boneLymphnodesLymph

nodes,lungScalp,head, neck,backFace,

lymphnodesLung,liverRetroperitoneumMediastinum,

lung,lymphnodes,bonemarrowLiver,

peritoneum,diaphragmLungDuration

ofresponse4+34+4*3+4+'315+8+2*15+'9+*

" Nodules excised at 4 mo, now disease free (negative exam, negative bonescan) 6-1-mo later.

* Complete response.

on a chest computerized tomography scan. The duration of allresponders is shown in Table 5.

DISCUSSION

Our effort to improve upon existing protocols of adoptiveiniiminotlicrapy included modifications of methods for PBMCprocurement, cell culture, and harvest, as well as a meaningfulreduction in toxicity. We have independently verified the resultsof Muul (15) and Yannelli (16) which demonstrated the safetyand efficacy of LAK cell generation in bags as assessed by abattery of in vitro assays. Cell yields of rIL-2-activated PBMCcultured in bags were slightly but consistently higher than yieldsof PBMC cultured in roller bottles (data not shown). In addition, our data show that PBMC processed within the enclosedautomated system generated a population of LAK cells thatwere indistinguishable from those generated in roller bottles asjudged by their cell surface phenotype (data not shown) andtheir ability to kill chromium-labeled fresh tumor or Daudi. Inaddition, the enhanced natural killer activity against KS62generated in bags was found to be equivalent to that generatedin roller bottles.

Before this automated system of cell culture was implementedfor use in our human LAK cell protocol, we assessed the abilityof murine LAK cells, generated in bags or flasks, to mediatethe regression of pulmonary métastases.We found significantdifferences in the number of pulmonary métastasesbetweenmice treated with rIL-2 alone and those treated with rIL-2 plusLAK cells generated in flasks or plastic bags. Consistent with

5009on May 9, 2020. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 4: Adoptive Immunotherapy of Human Cancer Using Low-Dose … · LOW-DOSE rIL-2 AND LAK CELL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY transferred to a cell culture bag (PL 732 tissue culture flask, 330 cm2,

LOW-DOSE rIL-2 AND LAK CELL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY

all other parameters examined, no significant difference in thereduction of the number of pulmonary métastaseswas observedbetween groups treated with rIL-2 plus LAK cells generated inbags or flasks. This indicates that murine LAK cells generatedin bags were as effective as LAK cells generated in conventionalculture flasks in mediating tumor destruction in vivo.

PBMC were procured from patients using the automated CS-3000 cell separator and were purified by Ficoll density gradientcentrifugation in the original cell collection bag. Cells weretransported to the laboratory where a computerized auxiliarypump dispensed appropriate volumes of culture medium andcells into plastic tissue culture bags. Following the activationperiod with rIL-2, cells were harvested by the CS-3000. All ofthe required manipulations were carried out in a completelyenclosed, aseptic system. Clinically significant numbers of cellswere easily generated using the automated system, and in keeping with our conclusions from data presented earlier (Table 3),the in vitro cytotoxic activity was preserved. Although thenumber of cells infused into our patients was fewer than thenumbers of cells infused in other studies, this is most likelyattributable to a smaller lymphocytosis prior to leukapheresisrather than the automated cell culture technique. The reducedlymphocytosis is most likely the result of the low-dose rIL-2

regimen administered during Wk 1 of our protocol. We used alower dose of rIL-2 during Wk 1 of the protocol than eitherRosenberg (5) or West (6), and fewer leukaphereses were performed on our patients than those of West (6).

The response rates in humans treated with this low-dose rlL-2 and completely automated system are as good as previouspublished reports (5, 6). While the overall response rate isslightly higher here, this may partially reflect patient selectionwith regard to diagnosis (for example, only four patients withcolon carcinoma were treated, all nonresponders). In addition,the patients treated on this protocol did not have overwhelmingdisease burdens; however, in data presented elsewhere,4 the

patients responding were comparable with regard to age,amount of disease, location of disease, and duration of response,as well as diagnosis of metastatic disease. Another cardinalfeature of this protocol, which may have an influence on theresponse rate, is the administration of rIL-2 for several daysfollowing LAK cell infusion. Patients tolerated the prolongedadministration of low-dose rIL-2 such that for each patient,100% of the scheduled 14 doses of rIL-2 were given during Wk1 of the protocol and, on average, approximately 90% of thescheduled 23 doses following LAK cell infusion were administered (doses were withheld at the patient's request only, none

were withheld for Grade III or Grade IV toxicity). This low-dose approach differs significantly from that of researchers atthe National Cancer Institute (5) in which high-dose rIL-2 isgiven for up to 2 days following LAK cell infusion or untiltoxicity dictates holding additional doses. Studies in murinetumor models suggest that this limitation may curb responserates, because the infused LAK cells are not consistently ex-possed to rIL-2 which is probably required for sustained LAKcell activity in vivo (9). The present protocol also differs fromthat of another study in which systemic rIL-2 was administeredas a constant infusion in a 25- to 30-day treatment protocol inwhich patients were subjected to 2 rounds of leukapheresis andLAK cell infusion (6). Our data, in the case of the one retreatment patient whose metastatic tumor burden completely resolved upon retreatment, imply the efficacy of multiple coursesof low-dose rIL-2 and LAK cell immunotherapy.

4T. Eberlein et al. A new regimen of interleukin 2 and lymphokine-activated

killer cells: efficacy without significant toxicity, submitted for publication.

Another advantage of this low-dose regimen is that toxicitiesare significantly minimized. In data submitted elsewhere,4 only

1 of 29 treatment courses required intensive care unit admissionduring or following completion of the protocol. The patientsare managed by surgical house staff on a routine nursing unit.None of the patients has required vasopressors, none had hypotension, mental status changes have not been observed aswith other protocols (7), and a total of 11 units of blood havebeen transfused during all 29 treatment courses. Similar reductions in toxicity associated with the constant infusion of rIL-2

have been reported (6).In summary, we present a low-dose rIL-2 regimen, in con

junction with an automated system of PBMC collection, culture, and harvest. This automated system offers a simplified,less expensive, and safer alternative to previously describedlabor-intensive manual techniques. Our low-dose regimen withprolonged administration of rIL-2 following LAK cell infusionprovides an alternative to other more toxic, longer regimens ofrIL-2 immunotherapy. In the future we plan to retreat allresponders at 3 mo and 6 mo after initial treatment in an effortto prolong the duration of response and further reduce diseaseburdens.

REFERENCES

1. Grimm, E. A., Mazumder, A., Zhang, H. Z., and Rosenberg, S. A. Lymphokine-activated killer cell phenomenon. Lysis of natural killer-resistant freshsolid tumor cells by interleukin 2-activated autologous human peripheralblood lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med., 155: 1823-1841, 1982.

2. Damle, N. K., Doyle, L. V., and Bradley, E. C. Interleukin 2-activated humankiller cells are derived from phenotypically heterogeneous precursors. J.Immunol., 137: 2814-2822, 1986.

3. Tilden, A. B., Itoh, K., and Balch, C. M. Human lymphokine-activated killer(LAK) cells: identification of two types of effector cells. J. Immunol., 138:1068-1073, 1987.

4. Shiloni, E., Eisenthal, A., Sachs, D.. and Rosenberg, S. A. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity mediated by murine lymphocytes activated in recombinant interleukin 2. J. Immunol., 138: 1992-1998, 1987.

5. Rosenberg, S. A., Lotze, M. T., Muul, L. M., Chang, A. E., Avis, F. P.,Leitman, S., Linehan, W. M., Robertson, C. N., Lee, R. E., Rubin, J. T.,Seipp, C. A., Simpson, C. G., and White, D. E. A progress report on thetreatment of 157 patients with advanced cancer using lymphokine-activatedkiller cells and interleukin-2 or high-dose interleukin-2 alone. N. Engl. J.Med., 316:889-897, 1987.

6. West, W. H., Tauer, K. W., Yannelli, J. R., Marshall, G. D., Orr, D. W.,Thurman, G. B., and Oldham, R. K. Constant-infusion recombinant interleukin-2 in adoptive immunotherapy of advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.,316: 898-905, 1987.

7. Denicoff, K. D., Rubinow, D. R., Papa, M. Z., Simpson, C., Seipp, C. A.,Lotze, M. T., Chang, A. E., Rosenstein, D., and Rosenberg, S. A. Theneuropsychiatrie effects of treatment with interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells. Ann. Intern. Med., 107: 293-300, 1987.

8. Gaspari, A. A., Lotze, M. T., Rosenberg, S. A., Stern, J. B., and Katz, S. I.Dermatologie changes associated with interleukin 2 administration. JAMA,25«:1624-1629, 1987.

9. Mule, J. J., Shu, S., Schwarz, S. L., and Rosenberg, S. A. Adoptive immunotherapy of established pulmonary métastaseswith LAK cells and recombinant interleukin-2. Science (Wash. DC), 225: 1487-1489, 1984.

10. Lafreniere, R., and Rosenberg, S. A. Successful immunotherapy of murineexperimental hepatic métastaseswith lymphokine-activated killer cells andrecombinant interleukin 2. Cancer Res., 45: 3735-3741, 1985.

11. Lafreniere, R., Rosensstein, M. S., and Rosenberg, S. A. Optimal methodsfor generating expanded lymphokine activated killer cells capable of reducingestablished murine tumors in vivo. J. Immunol. Methods, 94: 37-49, 1986.

12. Wexler, H. Accurate identification of experimental pulmonary métastases.J.Nati. Cancer Inst., 36:641-643, 1966.

13. Miller, R. G. Simultaneous Statistical Inference. New York: McGraw-Hill,1966.

14. Muul, L. M., Director, E. P., Hyatt, C. L., and Rosenberg, S. A. Large scaleproduction of human lymphokine activated killer cells for use in adoptiveimmunotherapy. J. Immunol. Methods, 88: 265-275, 1986.

15. Muul, L. M., Nason-Burchenal, K., Carter, C. S., Cullis, H., Slavin, D.,Hyatt, C., Director, E. P., Leitman, S. F., Klein, H. G., and Rosenberg, S.A. Development of an automated closed cell system for generation of humanlymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells for use in adoptive immunotherapy.J. Immunol. Methods, 101:171-181, 1987.

16. Yannelli, J. R., Thruman, G. B., Dickerson, S. G., Mrowca, A., Sharp, E.,and Oldham, R. K. An improved method for the generation of humanlymphokine activated killer cells. J. Immunol. Methods, 700:137-145,1987.

5010on May 9, 2020. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 5: Adoptive Immunotherapy of Human Cancer Using Low-Dose … · LOW-DOSE rIL-2 AND LAK CELL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY transferred to a cell culture bag (PL 732 tissue culture flask, 330 cm2,

1988;48:5007-5010. Cancer Res   Deric D. Schoof, Barbara A. Gramolini, David L. Davidson, et al.   CellsRecombinant Interleukin 2 and Lymphokine-activated Killer Adoptive Immunotherapy of Human Cancer Using Low-Dose

  Updated version

  http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/48/17/5007

Access the most recent version of this article at:

   

   

   

  E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts

  Subscriptions

Reprints and

  [email protected] at

To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications

  Permissions

  Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)

.http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/48/17/5007To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link

on May 9, 2020. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from