additional chemical engineering investigations for arizona...
TRANSCRIPT
ADDITIONAL CHEMICAL
ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS FOR
ARIZONA'S MARICOPA SSC SITE
by
Edward A. Nowatzki, Eugene Mulier, Jay S. DeNatale,
German A, Ibarra-Encinas, Abdul-Hakim M. F. AlGhanem (1)
and John Welty (2)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SURFACE STUDIES ............................... 1
1.1 In~Place Testing: Field Slope Testing
2 • 0 IsABORATORY TESTING II.................. II . . . . . " .. II 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1 Sieve Analyses 2.2 Atteroorg Limits Analyses 2.3 Soil Classifications 2.4 Direct Shear Testing 2.5 Triaxial Testing 2.6 Ar1Ellyses of Collapse Potential
3 . 0 FINDINGS ..................................................... 5
3.1 Results of Drilling (Fanglcrnerate Boreholes Logs) 3.2 Re~llts of Field Slope Testing 3.3 Results of Laboratory Testing 3.4 Canparability of Fru1g1craerate Strength Data
3.4.1 Lab Data Versus Dilatometer Data 3.4.2 Lab Data Versus Field Slope Data 3.4.3 SPT Blow~Count Data Versus Seismic Survey Data
3.5 Open CUt Construction -- Stability Analyses for 90 degree, 60 degree, and 45 degree side slopes
4.0 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS .................................... 22
5 • 0 RElrEREN'CES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ell • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 23
APPENDIX A: FIELD BORING LOGS
APPENDIX B: FIELD SLOPE TEST FAILURE LOADS AND ~ES
APPENDIX C: LABORATORY DATA SHEETS AND CURVES
1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SURFACE STUDIES
1.1 In-Place Testing: Field Slope Testing
Much of the basin fill and fanglomerate is lightly to moderately cemented, and it is very d.ifficult to acquire undisturbed specimens from standard field sampling techniques. Disturbed and undis·turbed test speclmens will e>d1ibit nearly identical internal friction angles ¢, provIded that the specimens possess similar void ratios. HCJVI1ever, the materIal's apparent cohesion c generally decreases as the degr(~e of sampling·-induced disturbance increases. For this reason, laboratory testing rnay significantly underestimate the shear strength of the material in it's natural, undisturbed state, A novel program of field slope testing was therefore corlducted to .identify the shear strength of the basin fill in it's natural state. A 10-foot deep, 35~foot long benched trench was dug in the material with a ste~n shovel, and several separate slope failures were then illduced by applying a Slwface loading at the crest of the newly created vertical slope.
A one-inch thick, square steel plate, 8 inches or 15 inches in length, was placed near the crest of the slope, as shown in Figure 1 . 1 , 1 . A uniform load of increasing intensity was then applied to the plate by means of a 50--ton hydraulic jack. The rear-end of the steam shovel provided the reaction support for the hydraulic jack. The surface surcharge was gradually increased unt.i1 the slope failed, and the failure load and slip Sl"Lrface geometry were then recorded. Ten separate tests were performed -- five on the upper slope and five more on the lower slope (see Appendix A). The shear strength par~neters of the mldisturbed basin fill were then back-calcu.lated by means of an accepted analytical procedure (described in detail in Section 3.2).
5.0fJ If
Figure 1.1.1
Sketch of Field Slope Testing Set-up, Maricopa Site
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SURFACE STUDIES ............................... 1
1.1 In-Place Testing: Field Slope Testing
2 • 0 LABORATORY TESTING ........................................... 3
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6
Sieve Analyses Atterberg Limits Analyses Soil Classificatio~s Direct Shear Testing Triaxial Testing Analyses of Collapse Potential
3 • 0 FIlIDINGS ........•............................................ 5
3.1 Results of Drilling (Fanglomerate Boreholes Logs) 3.2 Results of Field Slope Testing 3.3 ReSlllts of Laboratory Testing 3.4 Canparability of Fanglomerate Strength Data
3.4.1 Lab Data Versus Dilatometer Data 3.4.2 Lab Data Versus Fi~J,d, Slope Data 3.4.3 SPT Blow-Count Data Versus Seismic Survey Data
3.5 Open cut Construction -- Stability Analyses for 90 degree, 60 degree, and 45 degree side slopes
4.0 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS .................................... 22
6.0 ~................................................... 23
APPENDIX A: FIELD BORING LOGS
APPENDIX B: FIELD SLOPE TEST FAILURE LOADS AND GEam'RIES
APPENDIX C: LABORATORY DATA SHEETS AND CURVES
1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SURFACE STUDIES
1.1 In-Place Testing: Field Slope Testing
Much of the basin fill and fanglomerate is lightly to moderately cemented, and it is very difficult to acquire undisturbed specimens from standard field sampling teclmiques. Disturbed and undisturbed test specimens will exhibit nearly identical internal friction angles ¢, provided that the specimens possess similar void ratios. However, the material's apparent cohesion c generally decreases a.s the degree of sampling-induced distu.rbance increases. For this reason, laboratory testing may significantly underestimate the shear strength of the material in it's natural, undisturbed state. A novel program of field slope testing was therefore conducted to identify the shear strength of the basin fill in it's natural state. A lO-foot deep, 35-foot long benched trench was dug in the material with a steam shovel, and several separate slope failures were then induced by applying a surface loading at the crest of the newly created vertical slope.
A one-inch thick, square steel plate, 8 inches or 15 inches in length, was placed near the crest of the slope, as shown in Figure 1.1.1. A uniform load of increasing intensity was then applied to the plate by means of a 50-ton hydraulic jack. The rear-end of the steam shovel provided the reaction support for the hydraulic jack. The surface surcharge was gradually increased until the slope failed, and the failure load and slip SlU'face geometry were then recorded. Ten separate tests were perfonned -- five on the upper slope and five more on the lemer slope (see Appendix A). The shear strength parameters of the undisturbed basin fill were then back-calclllated by means of an accepted analytical procedure (described in detail in Section 3.2).
Figure 1.1.1
" "
"""":---:: I
~""'" """'."'""' . ...".,....,,, """,',....,,""' .. ",'",.,','.', ""'., ,...;:, '~"-'>------ I ~ ~-r~'M;; ~,
~~ ja.QU ff
t~
Sketch of Field Slope Testing Set-up, Maricopa Site
2.0 LABORATORY TESTING
2.1 Sieve Analyses
Sieve analyses were performed on samples acquired from different depths within the various boreholes. All analyses were conducted in accordance with ASTM D421 and D422 standards for s~nple preparation and testing. A s~nple weighing between 100 and 500 grams was oven~dried and then placed in a sieve stack consisting of #20, #40, #60, #140, and #200 sieves. The stacl< was vibrated in a mechanical sieve shaker for about ten minutes, and the percentage (by weight) of material passing each sieve was recorded. 'I'he s~nple's grain size distribution curve was constructed from the five data points obtained by means of the sieve analysis. The in situ moisture content of each sample was also measured.
2.2 Atterberg Limits Analyses
Atterberg Limits analyses were performed on remolded samples acquired from different depths within the various boreholes. All analyses were conducted in accordance with ASTM 4318 standards.
2.3 Soil Classifications
The borehole samples were classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) using the standard ASTM D2487 procedure. The results of the sieve analyses and Atterberg Limits testing provided the necessary nunlerical data relating to grain size and plasticity.
2.4: Direct Shear Testing
Direct shear testing was performed on intact C'ME and diamond drill core samples from boreholes MA-12 and MO-12. All testing was conducted in accordance with ASTI1 D3080 standards. Tests were run at several different normal (vertical) stresses, and continuous measurement was made of both shear stress and shear deformation. Vertical displacement during shear was not recordecl.
2.5 Triaxial Testing
Unconsolidated Undrained (UU) triaxial testing was pel "formed on intact diamond drill core salnples from borehole MO-12 f in accordance wi th ASTM D2850 standards. Each 2-inch (50 llun) dialneter t 4. 5-inch (114 lIDn) high cylindrical sample was tested at it IS natul:'al moisture content. The testing was all strain-controlled, with an axial deformation rate of 0,40 in/hr (10 mm/hr). Each test was carried beyond the point of peak: deviator stress and to an axial strain of at leae;;t 5%.
2.6 Analysis of Collapse Potential
The procedure followed in determining the collapse potential of near-surface soils at the Maricopa Site is described in detail by Nowatzki (1980) and is referred to as the II one-dimensional pseudo"-consolidation test." The test is called a pseudo-consolidation test because the sample in the oedometer is not saturated prior to load application, as is the case in a conventional consoHdation test, Instead, a series of tests is performed in wrlich undisturbed samples, approximately two inches in diameter and one inch thick, are placed at in-situ moisture content in an oedometer. Following application of a 200 psf seating 1~1, each srunple is loaded in a sequence of vertical stress increments until a predetermined rnaximum stress is reached. The appUed stress increments generally double the magnitude of the existing stress. Following application of a given stress increment I displacement readings are taken periodically (usually 15 minutes apart for the first hotu~ and then once every ho'UI") until the difference between two successive readings is less than 0.001 inches. ~len the vertical stress on the sample has been incremented to a level approximately equal to the anticipated allowable foundation pressure, the sarr~le is saturated while still under load, and displacement read1ngs a1:'e taken in the same manner as described above. The anticipated al10wable foundation pressure is predetermined on the basis of design loarJ.s, the foundation soil's strength properties I and the type and size of fou:ndation system that is most economical. In general, the pseudo-consolidation test as described above can be completed within 24 ho'UI"s. The results are usually reported in terms of total applied stress and percent compression (strain). The following loading sequences were used in this study:
1. 200 psf, 1200 psf f saturation. 2. 200 psf, 2400 psf, saturation. 3. 200 psf, 1200 psf, 2400 psf, saturation. 4. 200 psf, 1200 psf, 2400 psf, 4800 psf, saturation. 5. 500 psf, 1000 pst, 2000 psf, 4000 pst, 8000 pst, 16000 psf,
32000 psf, 4000 psf, 32000 ];)Sf I saturation.
3.0 FINDINGS
3.1 Results of Drilling (Fanglomerate Borehole Logs)
Thirteen :new test borings were conducted as part of the most recent geotechnical investigations, The actual field boring logs are contained, for reference, in Appendix A. The borings were taken to a depth of up to 200 feet, A wide range of materials were encountered I ranging from boulders and cobbles, to clayey gravels (GC soils, according to the Unified Soil Cla..",sification System) I to well- and poorly-graded sands, silty sands, and clayey sands (8W, SP, SM and SC soils) I to silts, sandy silts I clays, and sandy clays of low plasticity (ML and cr. soDs). No sil ts or clays of hlgh pla..",tici ty were encountered, Standard penetration testing WOE done at boreholes MA-l, MA-3, MA~3A, MA~4, MA-6, MA-l0, MA-ll, MA-12 , and Mk~13, and all blow count information is contained on the respective boring logs (see AplJendix A) •
3.2 Results of Field Slope Testing
DisDJrbed and unclisttu~~.od test specimens exhibit nearly identical Internal friction angles 'I, provided that the specimens possess similar voId ratlos. Hence, the friction angle of the basin fi11 in its natuxal state may be fixecl at ¢ "'" 32 -- the value that was measured by direct shear laboratory testing on intact samples extracted from borehole MA-12.
A slope failure is associated with a safety factor of F ~ 1. Since the applied surface surcharge I failure suxface geometry, and in s1 tu unit 'Weight were measured for each of the ten individual field slope tests, the cohesive component of shear strength becomes the only relevant uriknow-n, Stability analyses of the slopes may therefore be used to back-calculate the h:'1Sin fill's undisturbed cohesion c. The relatively small loaded surface area led to the development of a roughly wedge-shaped slip surface (Figure 3.2.1), and conventional two-dimensional plane strain slope stabiU ty procedtlres I such as Bishop's Modified Method (Bishop, 1955), Jan.bu's Method (Janbu, 1973) I
or the Morgenstern-Price Method (Morgenstern and Price, 1965), would overestimate the cohesion associated with a given safety factor. The method of Hovlanct (1977), on the other hand, aCC01lnts for the "end-effects II associated with a truly three-dimensional failure suxface, and this procedure was therefore used to analyze the field test data,
The cohesion c is calculated from the equation (Hovland, 1977):
where:
C :::::::
rb'sin i [~---------][F
3B 3
tan III ---------] B tan i
2b' B = {[----- sin i]2 + 1}1/2
w
r/J ::::: internal friction angle ::::: 32 i := angle of inclination of the slip surface (measl..lred) b l = maximum depth of the failure surface perpendicular to the
crest of the slope (measured) w := maximum length of the failure surface parallel to the
crest of the slope (measw:'ed) ,. ::::: equivalent tmit weight (which accounts for the unit
weight of the soil plus the applied surface sl.;U'charge) F3= the three-dimensiorv'3l safety factor::::: 1 (at failure)
A complete record of the field slope testing is included, for reference, in Apperu.iix B, An example of the back<-calculation procedllI'e is also provided. nle cohesion values associated with the various tests are presented in Table 3,2,1. As may be observed, the cohesion values for the uppermost five feet of soil (Tests #1--#5) are significantly lower than the values corresponding to failure surfaces wi thin the five-to ten--foot depth range (Tests #6-#10), These results should be expected, since normal exposure and weathering reduces the cohesive particle bonding in the uppermost few feet of material, The value of c ::::: 2430 psf I which is the average value for the lower-bench failures (Tests #6--#10) I may therefore be regarded as a conservative lower estimate of the undisturbed cohesion of the basin fill material.
3.3 Results of Laboratory Testing
The data obtained from the laboratory sieve and Atterberg Limits analyses, and the direct shear, triaxial, and consolidation testing are included for reference in Appendix C. The results of the sieve and Atterberg Limits analyses are surmnarlzed in Table 3.3.1, and the results of the strength testing program are summarized in Table 3.3.2.
The :i::'esul ts of the pseudo-consolIdation tests are summarIzed in Table 3.3.3 and shown graphically in Figure 3.3.1. Jennings and I{night ( 1975) regard the strain occurring at a saturation stress of 4000 ps:f as an index of collapse called the "Collapse Potential". They define the following critical values for the Collapse Potential (Cp ):
gp.J!l
0-1 1 - 5 5~1O
10 -20 >20
Severity
No problems Moderate problems Problems Severe problems Very severe problems
As can be seen from Table 3.3.3 and Figure 3.3.1, the data obtained from pseudo-consolidation tests performed on sol1s from the Maricopa S1 te suggest a Collapse Potential of approximately 9%. TIlis indicates that there is a potential for settlement problems as a result of collapse. However I the field samples were not retrieved directly into oedometer rings I as is usually the case. Thus, pseudo-consolidation test specimens had to be prepared in the laboratory by extruding them from the field salnpler into the oedometer rings. This dual handling proced:ure undoubtedly resulted in sample disturbances which caused the specimens to have greater values of Cp than conventional "undisturbed" salnples would have had. For this reason, the severity of the collapse problem is expected to be less than that suggested by the laboratory test data. This interpretation is consistent with the evaluation of collapse susceptibHi ty made on the basis of the Gibbs criterion as shown in Fi.gure 3.3.2. Therefore, methods typically recommended by geotechnical engineering consultants in Arizona for stabilizing such soils (e.g. excavation and recanpaction under controlled conditions) are expected to be effective for collapse susceptible soils at the Maricopa site.
The pseudo-consolidation tests in this study were performed on salnples retrieved from depths of from 30 to 60 feet. Ali (1987) has shown that the probability of encmmtering collapse susceptible soils decreases with depth. Therefore, so11s exhibiting a high degree of collapse potential are not expected to occur below a depth of about 30 feet, and protJably more shallow. Since the potential for collapse settlement is such an important consideration in the design of founclations for surface structures, and since the results of laboratory pseudo-consolidation tests are susceptible to sample disturbance I full scale field tests should be performed at the site of the main campus to verify the existence of collapse-susceptible so11s and determine their sever i ty with (:lepth.
3.4 Comparability of Fanglomerate strength Data
~J=?b~~Jl~I§,1~::fLPilatometer Data: The results of the field dilatometer testing program have not yet become available.
3.4.~Lab_Data Versus Field Sl~~: Direct shear testing was performed on intact specimens of basin fill material extracted from borehole MA-12 at depths of 30 to 65 feet. As mentioned previously in Section 3.3, this direct shear testing yielded minimul'll shear strength parruneters of ¢ = 32 and c ::::: 2160 psf. By comparison, the field slope testing on the unweathered lower bench (involving material at depths of 5 to 10 feet) yielded an average cohesion of c = 2430 psf. As a consequence of sampling-induced disturbance, the laboratory specimens should be expected to have a cohesion which is lower than that for the material in its natural (undisturbed) state. Indeed, it appears as though the process of sampling reduces the material's cohesion by at least 10%. The results of the laboratory and field testing are consistent, and minimum strength parameters of ¢ ::::: 32 and c ::::: 2430 IJSf may be assigned, with confidence, to the cemented basin fill material.
3.4.3 SPT_ BIO\l11.::Q9~!~~smi£_Surv~ Dat~: A comparison is made between elastic moduli determined from 8PT blaIJ counts obtained from boreholes on or near the ring alignment with moduli values computed fran velocity data obtained from seismic sturveys performed at or in the vicinity of the borehole locations. The seismic data were correlated to modultlS by the relationship:
where:
E ::::: VC2 [(1+Y)(1-2~}/(1-v)][l/g]
E ::::: modulus of elasticity Vc ::::: compression wave velocity " ::::: Poisson I s ratio ~ ::::: unit weight of soil or rock 9 ::::: acceleration due to gravity
This expression can be rewritten as:
where
E :: V 2K C
K ::::: a material constant
For the materials at the Maricopa site the following values of the material parameters were found to be appropriate:
~ "" 0.33 1" '"' 125 pcf
If these values are used with 9 - 32.2 ft/sec/sec to evaluate K, and Vc is expressed in ft/sec then:
E(tsf) = 0.00131Vc2
The SPT blow count data were correlated to modulus by the following relationship developed for sands and gravels by Wrench and Nowatzki (1987) :
E{tsf) = 22.2 N 0.888 a
Table 3.4.1 shavvs that although the moduli do not appear to correlate well nUJl1erically at shallow depths, there is consistency between the results regarding an increase of modulus with depth. Both sets of data suggest that the material within approximately 20 feet of the surface has a much lower modulus than the alluvial fanglomerate below that depth. At shallow depths the modul~s is generally less than 1000 tsf, whereas at depths greater than approximately 20 feet the modulus is generally greater than 3000 tsf and in some locations greater than 7000 tsf. This agrees with results reported elsewhere (see, for example, DeNatale et aI, 1987 and Beckwith et aI, 1988) .
It should be noted that seismic data give an integrated value for velocl ty and modulus over a range of depths, whereas blow counts are taken at specific depths. With the seismic data, discrete changes of strata dellc'Si ty are recorded by discrete changes in compression wave velocity. SPT blow counts, on the other hand, are non-integrative and. pertain only to the depth at which they are taken, It would not be correct to average blow counts over a range of depths and use the average value as representative of the stratum. In addition, for this study, the SPT blow counts were recorded for three 6--inch increments with the reported N-value (N ) being the sum of the blows over the last two 6-inctl increments. If "the full 6-inch penetration was not reached after 50 hammer blows in any increment, the test was discontinued, and the count was reported as 50 blows for the actual penetration obtained in that increment. In those cases the 8PT blow count was increased by linear proportion to the full 6-inch penetration, so that a value of N could be computed for use in the equation above. This extrapolation &n significantly underestimate the actual 6-inch penetration that would have occurred had the test been continued. Therefore the moduli reported in Table 3.4. 1 for depths greater than 10-20 feet represent lower limits of the in situ moduU that can be expected. In all cases, data were used from the seismic survey conducted closest to the borehole for which 8PT data were available.
3.5 Open-Gut Construction -- Stability Analyses For 90 Degree, 60 Degree, And 45 Degree Side Slopes
The primary component of the sse project is the 52-mile long collider ril19 that will be housed in a 10-foot di~neter concrete tunnel placed 30 feet or more below the ground surface. The most economical way to construct an underground tunnel of this type in Arizona is by the cut-and-cover method. In this approach, a tunnel is formed by excavating downward from the ground surface. Precast cylindrical concrete tm1nel s~nents are placed in the open trench with cranes, and the trench is then backfilled with the excavated soil. At the Maricopa
si te, about half of the underground accelerator ring can be placed by the cut-and-cover lllethod. Since the amount of material to be excavated decreases as the sides of the excavation become more steep, the cut-and-cover method becomes most economical when an l~~lpported
vertical excavation profile can be used.
Bishop's Modified Method (Bishop, 1955) provides a conservative relationship between the safety factor F and the excavation depth H in a homogeneous deposit where circ,"Ular sl ip surfaces are expected, If the cohesion and friction angle of the alluvial material are conservatively fixed at c ::::: 2430 psf and ¢ ::::: 32 , a computer-aided stability analysis based on Bishop's Modified Method indicates that it is possible to excavate vertically downward to a depth of 100 feet and still have a safety factor against slope failure in excess of one. Table 3.5.1 presents a SUlIDnary of safety factors for heights of up to 100 feet and slope angles of 45 , 60 I and 90. It should be pointed out that vertical slope faces are actually preferable to inclined ones, since vertical faces are less susceptible to weakening due to water infi! tration, in the event tha.t precipitation occurs before the excavation has b~en backfilled,
TABLE 3.2.1: VALUES OF COHESION AS BACK-GALCULATED FROM FIELD SLOPE TESTING.
Cohesion Test # Bench (in psf)
1 Upper 2 Upper 1393 3 Upper 1203 4 Upper 738 5 Upper 469
6 Lower 7 Lower 2619 8 Lower 2657 9 Lower
10 Lower 2007
Average Cohesion For Upper-Bench Failures 950
Average Cohesion For !.ower-Bench Failures 2430
TABLE 3.3.1: RESULTS OF LABORATORY SIEVE AND A'l'TERBERG LIMITS ANALYSES.
% < #200 Moisture Atterberg Limits Borehole Depth (ft) Sieve Content % LL PL PI
MA~lO 0.5 - 2.0 29 3.4 3.5 - 5.0 26 21 20 1 8.5 - 9.0 14 4.3
13.5 -13.9 17 19.5 -23.5 24 30.0 -30.5 13 23 19 40.0 -40.3 19 55.0 -55.4 22 60,0 -60.5 5.7 65.0 -65.4 30 68.5 -73.0 7 80.0 -80.2 35 85.0 -85.4 7.0 90.0 -90.4 37
MA-11 0.5 - 2.0 31 3.8 10.0 -10.4 14 6.7 20.0 -20.3 35 6.2 30.0 -31.5 14 4.2 19 18 1 40.0 -40.3 23 5.5 55.0 -55.2 21 6.4 65.0 -65.5 19 3.4 73.5 -73.8 11 6.3
MA-12 0.5 - 2.0 12 2.0 22 9 13 15.0 -15.7 22 7.1 25.0 ~25.8 38 7.6 30.0 -32.8 38 33.5 -34.9 16 3.7 48.5 -48.9 41 7.4 53.5 -54.2 34 8.0 61.0 -62.0 27 7.1 37 68.5 -69.1 38 12.6 73.5 -73.9 28 9.2
TABLE 3.3.1: RESULTS OF LABORATORY SIEVE AND ATTERBERG LIMITS ANALYSES. ( Continued)
% < #200 Moisture Atterberg Limits Borehole Depth (ft) Sieve Content % LL PL PI
MR-l 5 - 10 10 2.4 28 19 9 15 - 20 13 7.4 44 22 22 25 - 30 22 2.4 26 22 4 35 ~ 40 14 4.3 31 17 14 45 - 50 14 3.1 55 - 60 5 4.0 65 - 70 6 4.9 75 - 80 11 4.8
MR-2 5 - 10 11 6.2 54 50 4 15 - 20 21 4.3 32 22 10 25 - 30 4 2.9 35 27 8 35 - 40 17 3.6 37 20 17 45 - 50 17 0.9 55 - 60 19 2.5 65 - 70 19 3.6 75 -- 80 13 2.8
TABLE 3.3.2: RESULTS OF LABORATORY STRENGTH TESTING
Source of Type of Laboratory Cohesion Friction Specimens Ma.terial Test c (l2§f} AngIe !
MA--12 Basin Fill Direct Shear 2160 32~
MD~12 Fanglanerate Direct Shear 9000 27·
MD-12 Fanglomerate Trirudal 11400 26-(Peak Value)
MD-12 Fanglomerate Triaxial 2000 39· (at 5% Strain)
TABLE 3.3.3: ~ OF RESULTS OF PSEtJDO-CONSOLlDATION TESTS FOR BOREHOLE MA-12
Applied Stress Strain Sample Depth (psf) (%)
30 ' 3" -- 32' 9" 1200 2.38 1200 S 11.59
C = P 9.21
30'3" - 32'9" 2400 5.87 2400 S 13.01
C = P
7.14-
1200 1.85 2400 4,70 2400 S 11.45
C = P 6.15
30'3" - 32'9" 1200 1. 78 2400 4.38 4800 7.36 4800 S 16.68
C = P 9.32
61'0" - 63'6" 500 0.50 1000 1.42 2000 2.61 4000 3.49 8000 4.91
16000 6.89 32000 8.44
4000 7.20 32000 8.68 32000 S 25.00
Cp = 16.32
TABLE 3.4.1: COMPARISON OF ELASTIC MODULI OBTAINED FROM SPI' BLOW COUNTS WITH MODULI OBTAINED FROM SEISMIC SURVEYS.
SPI' Blow Count Data Seismic SUrvey Data Maximum
Depth Modulus Depth Modulus Boring (ft) (tsf) (ft) (tsf)
MA-l o - 11 < 500 o - 57 5694 11 - 75 >4000
MA-3 o - 11 <1000 o - 6 838 11 - 60 >4000 6 -300 20522
MA-4 o - 11 < 500 o - 5 1500 11 -100 >3000 5 - 36 23784
36 -509 78357
MA-6 o - 5 < 500 o - 15 2046 5 - 70 >5000 15 -260 24481
MA-I0 o - 9 < 500 o - 44 5909 9 - 65 >3000 44 -106 16379
65 -150 >7000 106 -319 56202
MA-ll o - 20 <1000 o - 8 258 MA-l1 20 - 40 >3000 8 - 29 7470
40 - 74 >7000 29 -221 14798
MA~-12 o - 10 < 500 o - 9 247 MA-12 10 - 74 >4000 9 -130 1.0926
MA-13 o - 22 <2000 o - 97 327 22 - 75 >5000 97 -161 16583
TABLE 3.5.1: SAFETY FACTORS AS A FUNCTION OF SLOPE HEIGHT AND SLOPE ANGLE.
Slope ---------- Safety Factor Values -------------Height Slope Angle Slope Angle Slope Angle (feet) of 45 Degrees of 60 Degrees of 90 Degrees
40 4.05 3.35 2.17 50 3.47 2.87 1.81 60 3.08 2.53 1.57 70 2.80 2.28 1.40 80 2.59 2.09 1.27 90 2.41 1.94 1.17
100 2.29 1.82 1.09
• ____________ ~2~.7Le~fut~· ______________ ~7/
- 7 ~
/' ._._/-._._. / /
----------.-4r---
----,---.----.~~-
20.00
-
--
15.00
-
-----
.r--..... -~ -
'--./ 10.00 -
0.. -o ---
--
--
5.00 --
-----
--
0.00
y
V V
V
V /
V V
V
10 Saturation Stress (ksf)
.-*
/ V
Collapse Strain (%) versus Saturation Stress (ksf) Maricopa SSC Site - Borehole MA-12
Collapse Potential = Collapse Strain at Saturation Stress = 4 ksf (Jennings & Knight, 1979)
20.00
15.00
,.-..... I:R
'----'"10.00 Q..
o
5.00
0.00
--------------------
-----------
-.---
1
~
V V V
V V
V V
V
10 Saturation Stress (ksf)
Figure 3.3.1
.--*
L V
Collapse Strain (%) versus Saturation Stress (ksf) Maricopa SSC Site - Borehole MA-12
Collapse Potential = Collapse Strain at Saturation Stress = 4 ksf (Jennings & Knight, 1979)
10 '
-u c..
>-!::: C/)
z w 0
>-c:: 0
50r-----------------~--~----------------~--~----~
60
70
80
90
100
110
COLLAPSING SOILS Specific Gravity
2.6
Specific Gravity
2.7
Depth == 30'3" - 32'-9" A
NON-COLLAPSING SOILS
Depth == 61'0" - 63'6"
•
120~~~----~--------~----~~~--------~--------~ 30 40 50 60 10 20
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
Figure 3.3.2
Collapse-Susceptibility Diagram (After Gibbs,196l) Maricopa SSC Site - Borehole MA-12
/
.--. . ---;/-.
. --/ '--.
1.00 ft.
1.00fl.
'-- .---
Figure 3.2.1
A Typical Field Slope Failure Surface Geometry
20.00 ---------
15.00 -------
,--... -~ -
,---'' 10.00 -a.. o -
-------
5.00
----
.---
0.00
1
'y
/ V
V V
V V
V V
10 Saturation Stress (ksf)
Figure 3.3.1
/~ V
Collapse Strain (%) versus Saturation Stress (ksf) Maricopa SSC Site - Borehole MA-12
Collapse Potential = Collapse Strain at Saturation Stress = 4 ksf (Jennings & Knight, 1979)
,
'10'
50~--------------------------------------~----------~
.... -
60
70
u 80 a.
>-t:: C/)
z w o >- 90 c:: o
100
110
COLLAPSING SOILS Specific Gravity
2.6
Depth = 30'3" - 32'-9" A
NON-COLLAPSING SOILS
Depth = 61'0" - 63'6"
•
120~~~----~--------~--------~--------~--------~ 10 20 30 40
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
Figure 3.3.2
Collapse-Susceptibility Diagram (After Gibbs,1961) Maricopa SSC Site - Borehole MA-12
60
4.0 CONSTRUCTION REQUIRmlJENTS
Construction requirements for the injector complex, experimental chambers, and campus building area, as well as analyses for foundation bearing capacity, settlement, and swell/collapse potential are discussed in detail by Beckwith et al (1988). Details of these analyses need not be repeated herein.
5.0 REFERENCES
1. Ali, M.M, (1987), "A Probabilistic Analysis of the Distribution of Collapsing Soil in Tu.cson Using Kriging Method" I PhD. Dissertation, The University of Arizona, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics.
2. Beckwith, G.H., Weeks, R.E., and Cheng, S.S. (1988), "The Prelimina:ey Geotechnical Investigation Main Campus Area, Maricopa SSC Site," Technical Report, SHB Consulting Geotechnical Engineers, Phoenix, Arizona.
3. Bishop, A.W. (1955), "The Use of the S1ip Circle in the Stability Analysis of Slopes," Geotechnique, Vol. 5, pp, 7-17,
4. DeNatale I 3. S . ( 1986) , "Progr'am CSI.IPl : For Slope Stabili ty Analysis by Bishop's Modified Method, with a Search Routine :Based on the Simplex Metb.od of NeIder and Mead, II Technical Report, The University of Arizona, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics.
5. DeNatale, 3,S" Nowatzki, E.A., and Welty, 3.W. (1987), "Geotechnical Engineering Investigations for Arizona's SSC Sites If I
Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Open-File Report 87-7.
6. Gibbs, B.3. (1961), "Properties which Divide Loose and Dense Uncemented Soils I" U. S. Bureau of Reclamation Report No. EM-608.
7. Hovland, H .... !. (1977), "Three-Dimensional Slope StabHity Analysis Method, II Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT-9, pp. 971-986.
8. Janbu, N. (1973) I "Slope Stability Computations," Emba.nkment Dam Engineering, casagrande Volume, pp. 47-86.
9. Jennings, J.E. and Knight, K. (1975), "A Gl'I.ic1e to Construction on or with Materials Exhibiting Addi tiona1 Settlement Due to Collapse of Grain structure," Proceedings of the 6th Regional Conference for Africa on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering I Vol. 1, pp. 99-105.
10. Morgenstern, N,R. and Price, V.E. (1965) I "The Analysis of the Stability of General Slip SUrfaces I" Geotechnique I Vol. 15 I No.1, pp. 79-93.
11. Nowatzki, E.A. (1980), "Settlement Estimates in Collapse-Susceptible Soils I r' Journal of Civil Engineering Design, Vol. 2, No.2, pp. 121-148.
APPENDIX A: FIELD BORING LOGS
/~ /frtR-/ ~~e ",oS ~. cha~e. ~"
h~ wh,:;!l"/ f ~kd 8~S" .. !-1 -==-__
---.6'/1 S-~d..~~~ ~..s CR~....,,~_~ ..
~ Y~6~~~~/~----=-~.,t' .::5'k~ ~ _ _ t ~~ / ~ h ''c-h ;;ni!9~ ~~.rl!?~~.:/~c:;') ..,the c:h~~¢!_~!2_ $~"S.~.~_It:_~/c~,'~ _~~~<;{-.k.x~~~e . ---_____ _
~~J"'f!:_~a/_-6e-tt!3.---~ g._ t::r~ __ _
W~t5J.,t4~dd t.;,t1!'d~ck ~ .... ,
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
Memo from Paul Smith
To vW / S;~ Date //30h8
I
?' 2-0~L _f_
js:;~L I~I -t-
.;:a6~u I /80 I - Z<z'5~~~_d _
_ /2c_~~61e". .. ~~~~C.l~.~c-r . ~/~~
-----
~r 6'bC'"~_~$"~ 7iie h~~k ---L>---~~- -;nec;(8~"'4:;-J~X!:S.?z w4.,.,I~t'_.J'/2~~9'2~S -4,'b~ __
_ !,r.!.t!'#'f."'; eo 4JL C $' ~ # ~~,.ER~~ _~~_~,. e . ________ ._ __
.---------.. ---------
_~~,.,~wp~1' ~~~-~~j'- ... ~ /_~~dd _~~e_~--&~_k.-~~~>-~ ~&~_.
/50 1-200/ --------- ~--* -----.--
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
.. II II
&I..
.!: .r. 0. II o
o
5
20
WI C II
~ " u 0': c: ~ " " C " .. .~ ... ~ c C " " • II UQ.1r
" u ;c "" .. ~ " t!)..J
DATE
/~:..:J~ / C' -
LOG OF TEST lORING NO. M·L -/
RIG TYPE __ ~~d%1.L/.~C=~~~~~~ ___ ~ ___________________________ _
BORING TYPE ____ ~()~Yz~"~-H~~~.~ _________ ~t~,---------SURFACE ELEV. ________________________________________ ___
DATUM
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
SILI'-/ SAND .:p,ed- ~'h'\e ~rq '1Y)ed.
n01"\ p!C\s-tic -+0 low r-- .,.. /, brc>~(\ '-
Ncri-e , 5e>,.-,e C'hL/ ~Lu.0;"'IP e'en{, 6e 10 W '-11--1 '--
SANDY CLAY Rne 9ro..\"e~ WeC\. ~ -b l'\'\o:::\ ' \ i Me Lot...0 -Meed.. ~ I t,bro~1""'\ .
SILTY sAND SO'>")e clay U/. ~/?7e ~ ki-V p. I. .
/, brotAJ/,}
SILTY CLAY S=M.e -Alfie $6..~ W +0 ~ l ilN\e Ce,M.
Lc~ +0 Mec{ P.:x (.ko~"1
_1-jS:!11 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
1 ~ I CONSULTING GEOTCCHNICAL ENGINEERS - 1 -- PHOENIX • TUCSON • Al...8UQlJEAOUE • SANTA. FE • SAlT LAKE CITY • El PASO
/ -.J .
LOG OF TEST lORING NO. ,N,A-I ,JOB NO. DATE RIG TYPE ___________________________________ _
, ~ .,
• ., E --; ., g ~ E ., c: ., ... -. " ~ ~ u. WI >0 IooOZ U ~~ u "0 ~ "'" ... WI C c:
.... 0 c: ~ :> " "
u ., ., ., c: ~ • :r. a. a. WI.J:l ~ 0 ... of ..... ~ ..... ~ -"" >oM ... c c: .. E E ~!;~ .. " ., .. ~ 0 " " ~.J:l
0 UCL.~ "'.J III III
CO __ O.J
BORING TYPE ________________________________ __ SURFACE ELEV. ______________________________ ___
DATUM
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
85 1---;1
90 1---1
I 95 I ,
I I ~
! ! , I i I I
---i I i j , ! ! ..
lOt) GROUND WATER DEPTH HOUR DATE
l1P/ -
SAMPLE TYPE A - Auger cutlings. B._ Block sample S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T _ ~" n.n. thin-w"ll"d Sh .. lbv tube.
_'~' SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH 1 '" B I CONSUL T1NG GeO'l'ECHNICAL e"""eeAS
- 1 -.....- PHOENIX' rucSON • A.LB~AOUE • $NITA. FE • SAlT LAKE CITY' El pASO
, , I'
, v -
•• .; RIG TYPE TFiQM P. "1fl'.)£:: ~.:: c: >- BORING TYPE LI2"~AV(z.f.R
~ o ! E -~ c:
- • 0- - cO - ,~ ,
u. .. c: • '" '-: CI >- • 0_ SURFACE ELEV. all'!· :> 0 u "i
>- ~o": ;; e U 0 je .: 0";: c: l- t ... '" . - DATUM :> II II U c: ~
1~ c: ~ - :i • • • 0 -- ~ c:
of ; ... ~ Q, Q, ..... ~ 0'" :> -
'" c c: .. "'0 E E .- ... >-wI .~~ t.= "
• o • • ! 0 00- .- II
0 U~III: "..I II II -,.- ~ ... o _ t:- REMARKS
VI VI CD_'! 0..1 ~~ ::JU VISUAL. CL.ASSIFICATION
r ,..:U .. Jl_I..... , •. T" I ri j( . ), .... :.. t ~ !'; :
JOBNO ~~-,-I! .... DATE Ivf"" /' '7
0 j .... ~ I \ Sf s I .
- , ., . : . : r-o I ~t ~A~D
: .. ., . I i ! I ~G++ fo c"..,s"dcro b I e sllf
.~_Jo' D AD-.--,----l , fred. .f the - J TO''.. ref
I f' •
! ,0 . : i IViod. , ttt"" SII bt'l' J v , ti , 10 S ObtOUht/("J
S- io ()' "'--~--.---j i .t(, I
'0' lLt i I I ... - "-I" ( c::.f"'! c- •• ~. ( f:-. Lo..'t\/y II,.., c.
I 0 !
1-0, ISM
{l-tO( sf- (: c ..... co ... ~J
I \ () I LD I l-'okpIClJ+''c.. o 17 :
I
!6
r i :;rGyt:*L. I.ro~v ..
I 0 I ' ! , ~ .
10 , "
~:o , of I r t'"l
Cl i I S Ii •. iY S,A.NO -T'
~ --l trGc.c. to ~o('o1c c..1t:<'( _Jt'
I I 1) 1 , j I pf~ct. {,'"C -jrq1rted
,Z" ' (J j I r vba~j\J/& , to So vi:. ro (,II< (J rei
! I ) j f i ,
=y' i IN k /'1. '£'.:,' F.' jc et fo (l-!od (7
ML \ ; 1 A :D - I /
I I Ii r I . { I"," C C C. 1"'/ ('" "I'r'c:
A+ I low f.r. I I
'i) ! ) 20 I s r r TO y', sL. brow., fc b ruWJ.,
J-:- Ii r '-
/"" ;" .. \ I' (HOI ~ t Nofc.: fOr? e. we/I· :Jr~~~
/:/ iD SCI",d.. ---~~-- ~
I .x IV (; fe,'. C Of'! ~ I ~ S
~ -.
'O;"Sl~C'G Lie i rl -zr 0- 60 0
\ /1 I V ~ "I f/11c.a ' IC,o 0 (,} lVo fe!'"",Cc.cc J ~ 0" c. I ) ~o to. fed r /'/ .Ii Sf
I, ,,., ) i !D
~rGf)el tik.d, co~l5'fes . () i / D
i ; I ! I ')1 lot No1e: IkCreclsc:of ~II+ (..v/tl ,(),
'20 '0 Ii fa I &t~pft.1 fOP''! ft~e-~,r,,'~t'J
I . i
~I (f le 01 sc$. I' I
~ (; "", I( ,OJ \ I I : : G
6. ' X iD ! ~(I,d Sit T '.0 i / I
so r- e .fi" e • J to ( "cd 'Q",e/
'[1 I so~e c.t~y ~.r
J , I I
'e\ J I SM (/. "., 0 clJr II ,.... c. l C. f'1 e .. fed
o \0 7/ . lOW f.:r· , I
D (110(.5+
\ ! i() 1 f,;,ro w '" ;: I co., "der-" LI Co
...
{)! 10 (V6tc..: f"t l (.t:;
'10 ! o f cl~(' WIH..
!O I
(yo 1c..: , tic. re.& S t:
\ 0 hufd dC~T"" --
: /0 Xi)
.,,'
.r liND)' C" f'tY ( ,CoL.)
,/\ i COlli Cf c1. ere. I:> Ie S I II-
LfS" o 1/ \' W k Iy fD fl'toc1ly' I,,..... c
cert' .. J.
10 ~ 1 I
0\ ! low -f? (Mtld. f:r.
D,\/: \ rvotc.: ((J/o'SId.tl,~lr
, I )1 11\-1) : I j \ft' "f" """ , . ~t'!;'U'''''
.. /Vote: f, ... c- rrv1nrcJ $'.(r/Ad
ill I' . , I fIIIL rf""",~ t'fr.1', rle-C.yfl-../ r-,,~'fL I fI .. .,:. fr:Jf'oo v bou-f ? s-io 1.6
50 'I / I I . i t ~ -f-r
GROUND WATER DATE DEPTH HOUR
SAMPLE TYPE A - Aug •• cuttings. B - Block sampl. S - 2" O.D. 1.38" I.D. tub. sampl •• U - 3" O.D. 2.42" I.D. tube sample.
_1-_1l8J'" I SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH I'" B I ~JlTwnRFrYtYt'>NIt':"'l ~~~QC:
PROJECT ~::: ~ - LOG OF TEST lORING NO. f,,c_-: JOB NO ;.: r/_ I 1-'" . , .
.~ RIG TYPE TEXOfV,fl Ic;2"P): . ~ 4? 'I •• c ... BORING TYPE r~~ER .. ~ .i. . ~ c .. .;i .. • g~ cO 0 Q./(J . • .. c • CL -. II ... . 0_ =~ SURFACE ELEY. Ii. :> 0 U ... ·o~ ;; e U 0 ~ E .!: o ~ t: 'i I- 1 ~ g- .. DATUM :> II II U • • c ~ ~ i ~::
c ~ • ~ ..... ~ • • . "; .; ; .. .~ "i. "i. . -" o CL ·U CL
CL ca E E .. !! ~ ;. lilt c c .. !! 0 00- ~ ... - II REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION • II •• II ~ -·0 o • c-
O UII.CI:: C)-I .,.. ID __ 0-1 ~II. ::IU
ro ,~U y i , - , I J/L7, ~ !tNP (5",) I I ~l. ,
--~ll' I~. : I I
I (lltCIJ+ Jor-re cI#y , . D' ; I r red, .t1 H • ~ r C"I i I'I",d ---jll I ~ -. ! S I
--j tl' ,. -\ ----T- i I i t'1~_ , ["beu": "/4' ~ ~ vL rou /'I.e! cd , I i ""onf ~.r
, ! " i I ) (. , i ~CI,cf ('1od Iy II f'YI , C C {VI (1-1 tr~ J ! ... L. ' ) , I
-~'nIL 1; I J p.r, I loW
d I Ij
D! ,
fvlL ~ r:>w~ J' I
!-,\{; td ,
I D.I;' .,f) \ i Noie: ((>u/r1e.'G~ It ~'1IC.C. 6CJ lo~u"" Ii f'tv tc : fir; c t! l (oyfy 1-t1A1'
I o,~ f [ rw ., rc, 'j',(~! S,c"He/ (cj.,tn. 10 " " r:12 ' '"
.. , I I J - f!" ~ -, ((.1 t. ("J ::;:'i;'J '" " r Ii ( i Not: u~ f" e ,- .'
+r~f'-1 -,- J~ t ?
(;,S-o Jr, 0 \ I i I i .P'I S tet-..:.r;. -- I ( -Ci.;) •
j 0 • !\ II i i I C It-I(.. rt /lseeJ C e tf;t ('tA c.-t, () ;.. o t ~ G
, Note:
111;71 IWi I tI' k"
,:.e(lJW Ifl .ft occuri"'r ,':':t.g.C'
lit:> 1'1t. ' or pod.;; ! 1 I ,
rJt '" r /(. T (/t1L) I ~ I i I -70 I' I f. tie -, 1"CI(,.~ci Nt",d
S .!O~~ J
fro, e. fr.; ,oft! c( 1-'1 0 ,,--. C' c e ("I (I. !rei \'"' ... f?otlly . ",,'It k 9-1
.... 10 c,..J p.r. I . h 1"o(JJN I i I I 111
5 (Yolc: ve'y (VI1C~Cec'().~
I r;~Fc' I"JeHt of e(,y I Co
"\- -I I ~ he (S!:b ~~ ~:t;._,....J'O_" ,.: wi. I I Not;,: co ... ~,tfe,.c.LII' Cr.II:>o-, ....
~ - .. cc r"GI"~ 1<c,"" .f r!'cr. yt"d '00 ~
i CL!iyfY S(LT (M&.)
~I ') ('CI",~itfe".(,f2(e It ... , -r.rc;,.c~ toooc - ;;- I~"d Iy fb r fr<tltf ',/ JfC ~ (' .. ire! 1
V"
~ -,. ,OW -to f"'.(t/ - f.X· I
" l-o vJ ... q"."",.].;' , VI - /VofC.'. dec.rec,s e I~ /:.c'. f!~ 'ow S"'"t -t-+ . -, Co
NO*-: 1/ ~ t Y . ("1 ( CC C ~Q \) $ V" ~
... - !yoic: cov.!id ~'''er. (1' C(' riot:-' , "" G fIt, r;( ~C-"y"; rfJd .I t1"C t-w.s
! I Sf£. T (M&') , r ! ! ofLr r: fr. '" I! - i fc; IM·e! ~v .. d
I I I , ..
J S;. '01"-' t! c.l" Y j
, f1-Cbd Iy.~~ ~P'f /!,. ffd
I
I ! , ! \ \ {"LV p.r.
. , brow.., j i i \
- GROUND WATER
D"TE DEPTH HOUR SAMPLE TYPE
A - Aug •• cutting.. B - Block sampl. 5 - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tub •• ampl •• U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tub •• omple.
_1_ ,
-'~I SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH 1~1 ~1!'T1N(';n~~~"" ~C'CIC:
r>ROJECT .,}L._
JOB NO r;::-. S I- 'I 3 (~ "')IU'-'I' ~ (1 [ LOG Of lEST lORING NO. [Vi"; -t:!
'; • II..
.E
t ~
-
DATE ""P'I'C,:',!
• c: • g ~ ~ :> 10 10 c: .. .. ;- ... !! c: c: • o • •
UAoA::
.-__ 1
! I ~ I-I
I
1---
===i I
1--1
I I 1
l , I I j
L ! i !
, I
I , ,
Ii
1
i
I I
i I
\ I ! i i i 1
I GROUND WATER
DEPTH HOUR
f'I-" r-I ,Z
I
i.
I I i I I
DATE
::. >- • ~ e c: .. .. ..
Q Q.
>- .' .. ~ Q-l
RIG TYPE -r""X-;I""t It1U'fi'{JS BORINGT~Y;P;E-----:~~';~J~I'~f~~~'f'~/~)~('-I-:~P'~~~-----------SURFACE ELE~V~.----~~O~(er-~~~L-----------------DATUM
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
~ fYote: fiery (Vtic.c; c ~'" C) s 1'(Ok:, : frGcc- fD C (I ,... l' C (j, d·o -
If' S I ,,(;(CDJ.1 Y"tc.t~, pro~"I-.I'I dr-
:'! ,",01 S f 17C;:;-(;:-:'r~('~dr;o:-ro-;;-:;-"P\t:._-'-----J -, .sfiNOL~IIJ) '+ W6td
V" .-
s ~, '5"' V' c:-~ ... ~
\
SAMPLE TYPE A - Aug., c:uttings. B - Bloc:k lompl. S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tu". lompl •• U - 3" 0.0. 2,42" 1.0. tu". lampl ••
('o""fcf~,..~i.I'e 5Y'ti"~( SO{'-f e cobl>/e.:
wr//- JfPdt"cI SU.!:'v~1vlc" TO t()("J •• c/cJ wkJy -fr> {'-ttodl'l 111'1-7 e ( e 4-. ('I. kef
116", r Iv:' T;C
b ro c.J'" (VDte: d ec ('(.~ s ~ c.f rf.:;()~1 ot-.{../ COb b /'t'; h I:{o,-" 6 '2.
ft, SIl.T-( st'ttvP (SM) ... rCt c e +0 fO fV1 t'. C III"y
p,..~d. -{"'Ie - ~r&'''("d .!vbco"'i u1e ,. to sobrof)l.dl"eI
f\1DJ ''7 Ii", e cef'Vt(., 'k~ low f.j. IJrow,", N o1'G.' $0,..-': ,,~I(·f,.,J..~J j'o,,:/ (' .. ~r.
U' 1 (ML.)
.rOM e f,,,,e·if rO;l1tc.( f",,-d. fro", '- c I ~ ~ocJ 1'7 to S'Tr-oilljly C~f'.~",ttd /,w p,:z:, ht<>w,", to J'rfS'/;s(. brow", Nok: , ... c..~,se 0 f ..f.,.,e-rl'&''''''/ ~(/",d.. Gl.cJ C "'/ helow ''7
-?f. ". fV0ok,.: trot. ~ f.t '" ~ • " ffJ lIel ~ e· lo(.j t e f-l-, .'
/Vo1(!..: frO(( (~('l:.o ..... t~l,):" f\,I'.I+')
s-toprt'd cI "''''tlt c;+ 70 4+ ((;S.~cI. J,to'e c".JiH.. 36" cas,i,., I1CiCII,fo,..,.tI r~'I;f"1i"11'1 ai clepi/.J of ,oJ ?l, c;",,( 64 "./sf, . r,U /I flo! c(,:. i "'J OVId b:n" -. trll{'c/ hie ,,,,ntJ.... tt01 1('( U·,!
)~r\\/ . / PROJECT~MCco"d.('(c""/m SuPer Co/~ JOB NoE87-1/3 DATE ::5/6/1/7
~~ I<!'r:'J LOG OF TEST lORING
RIG TYPE em€" 55
IS
.. C to " 0 U 0'';: c " " " c .. ~ .: e .!' c c .. o to • uo..n:
35 '---1
95
50 ~ -
.:: BORING TYPE G~ II +tSA
)..,
~ " .. u
SURFACE ELEV, _________ _
c .. ., ., o Q.
).. iii .. .t> 0-1
DATUM
REMARKS
/--'-1--+---+---+---4---1;V~ :~!oveq f--+-+-----4---+---+-, ---j~/~ ;tM.-3A
~~JW~ ~+-+----+----+---~----~
r-r~--~--__ ~ __ +-__ ~MA-3. ; .
i I I ! I I
L I I I I I
i I , ! i I
GROUND WATER
VISUAL CLASSIFIC,
Au~er ,duseJ 01 eoe .;)0" !dey- @ 32 '
- 'I
~ Ie ct:lI/f:!'d -h:> 2/. ~ack .. I)~4 ~~/e ..
;/f"veti?b b.p~/;Y /UA'
I DEPTH I HOUR I DATE I T\nrVJ .
SAMPLE TYPE A - Auger cuttings, B - Block sample , _ "),. n f) , "Q" I r'\ .,'~'" .. - ..... -1 ...
r:Je 10-1'2 LOG OF TEST lORING NO.MA-.3A
_i RIG TYPE C/I?E .55 , ~
6 Y .. "+1SA. " C> C ... BORING TYPE - ., E .i ., ~ c .. ., 8": E ,,0
-.!:' SURFACE ELEV. • .. c • '" .... " ... . " ... '00 a.. " " u
... ... o.J: .; a U " Ci I-C>M '" " - II) u
DATUM .: o :: c c ~ .." ... " " II
U '" . " .. c C> • C> .,
" C> -= " .. - :.E D. D. ".0 ~ o '" ~u . ';
~ ;.~ J--O ; '" '" t: t: " "'co E E 00- ... ,,' '0 ~ .- II REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION • o •• f 0 II II -"'lIfo .. .0 c-
o u~C:: ~...J II) II) 1:0_ .... O...J ::::E~ :lU
0 .:::;;~o./s/ /Vole,' See ~3 MA - 3
i ---! 0-32~
t I
I i
J :5 ! I
, !Vole 1 (!ons ;cl~1::J
t I i (/,racleci drave I a ~~ - /0.' I I ,
Ie) I I
!Vofe: $/;~h+ //)creose ,
";1 §.ra ve s +ro m MA - 3-+0
15 /IA -3A \ !
,
20
2S I
,
\'/ 30 sp- CLAYEY :5AN~ +r-o.ce.g~('l:\."e
sc. Pv-d. \ll\.ed.-bcoo..rse ~i =""".70/$/ rn.ed. . - lOlA) ?.J: .
'/. '{'l/ ~;-e/ 1 ,6-0-....>("\ - \. rectd.,\s,h. b ro~1"\ 35 /;J) S:Z:S '-f2-5':J/'-I 'f
P Note::: Sc:>\"'\e o..~l.LIa.r +,'ne o 0/;) ,~\'"" .... vel 35'- '10'
/0/0 /
'NO+e.: /IAe~ -hi~1rt BI. below tt "" "
.,~ " 'sols ~" '3'!'- to/fA inc.rea:se Ii? 7'0 • • !5io::::S
c,h.j (~). ,
Il~ () 0 (,}
110 0h' " " ..
7'5 ~ ." ~:s .50/57:"
~ol' I J'l~! I o 0' I
-_ -J;o,tohj I. r .! i
50 I .. ';-~'5!~/.:5:~
GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE I I DEPTH I ;;;~ I DATE I A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample -"S~I SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. lube sample.
,
'!
-,
PROJECT :Sv..Dercorv-:Lc-+;rlQ <u r:>..-r-- CbIt1der LOG OF TEST lORING No.MA-~ JOB NO.£B7-LI3 DATE ~~/C;/P.7
.. .. u. .E .; 0. • Q
50
55
bCJ
, k ., ., - ., E ., g~ E -
.. c .. 0. -: 0 >. •
" 0 u >. kO.c .; B
o. c ;; ~ ., M 0.
" D 0 U ., ., 0. • 0 C k
C k - ~ -;~~ ., .,
; .. .~ Q. Q. o 0. 0. .. >.w{ C C .. e 0
E E 00-kJ> o •• D D -co !] un-a:: C...J Of) Of) O...J
--~! Zf-----+--o D 1 i
- f% -1' , ssl.5o~"<) "" / I
r--t
---;; i [
~So/3 I
+-f--I
I
I
i I
! I !
i i I
I i
I
! I I I
GROUND WATER I DEPTH I HOUR I DATE I !1/J()"o
-~ RIG TYPE C/l?E :55 ~!f "$"~ c >. BORING TYPE ., k
C cO -.!? 0_
'00 SURFACE ELEY. u 0 .,- Of) u DATUM k C "'tJ; " ., e ';
.~~ :: WI .- 0 REMARKS o ., c_ VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
~n- ::>u
SP- s,-"?o/sr CLAYEY SAND Aa".ej -I".c:rce 7~')l'?e ~ rr::t ve.l ~- ?~. /7?ec:( coar.se;J("
I C'.L /?Jed -h (Jh P. I.
Afore: 1%;, I..j;rowl'] - /.~t'sh br: dr;I/;~ lkloLC> SILlY CLA'I
55" -troce.. -10 solV\e -H{)e Sqf"o\ .:5" h')O /$/
~r4 tV\cd ~ S+ro~ l\\'V\.e <:eM.. w-.~ ~.J:.
~ l, browll
l\Io+c:.··~e.. +h"-e-+=~. ' dv-. ~nc\ ±:>elo~ S9 'i'. Nok : ~""'e. M"'v\.5C>.l1'\e'Sc::' o)(ic!.e (b\q.:::.k.) ce~V\-tc:...+lo~ F~
.:7f~/.~r:I A~er~ 59 ~/_ -~ny:"/~'" r~ u-sede. SCf'9't
l70le eel vec/ -1-0 .55/
Le.f:'f hole or:~n ant{ C~verczl WI+!, i!Jwooc/.
,
I I
I
f
I SAMPLE TYPE -'A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample
<; _ ?" n n , '1Q" I r"'I + .. 1... ................. 1_ AS~I SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
.. • &I..
.E of '" • Q
o
10
II c: • :> 0 u o -: c :> 0 0 c: ~ .. = ... ~ c: c: II o • • U~III:
15 ,--i
.30
D u
:E "' ... ! 0
()..J
LOG OF TEST lORING NO.,t\A-Li
RIGTYPE _____ ~~12~t: __ =~~·;?~-~~~------------------/'~ "','<~ BORINGTYPE ____ ~~~~-~~~.~~~ ________________ __
SURFACE ELEV. ______________________________ ___
DATUM
REMARKS
$, /~~; SO r .:so."cr
VISUAL CLASSI FICA TlON
.. • II.
~ of t-
O
• c: • :0 0 U o :; c :0 D D c: ~ -; ... ~ c: c: • o • •
UQ.Q:
. .:: ~ . ~ e c: ~ .. ..
Q ... ~ .. ~JJ
O..J
LOG OF TEST .ORING NO • .Ir1P-'f
RIGTYPE __ ~('~~~/~)-=' ~;S~.~'~ __ ~ ____________________ _ /' v "~~..L BORINGTYPE ____ ~,~,~~~_=. ~~' __________________ __
SURFACE ELEV. ______________________________ ___
DATUM
REMARKS
Alc.,t~ : Mde-ef h;t? e 61 Sz:. 66. / ¢-7//~76 '
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
-PROJECT ~ C, - M,c,[(![ClPr [!"if LOG OF TEST lORING NO. [V:p - 5 JOB NO F (:'-1; .... DATE f'1 ft 'I 7 87 - , I
.i RIG TYPE 'T~~O""'~ 7 £.~/I( (J':;: . ~ <-L Z /1 DIP. ~:.1.6r« •• c >- BORING TYPE .. ~ . ~ .. o ~ - 'Co c • 0- _ .e
SURFACE ELEV. • .. c • I>. -: 0 >- • o- le u. :> 0 u >- ~o.c :; B u 0
.!: 0;: c: "0 ~ • .., I>. C ~ .- DATUM :> I> I> U I>. • 0 ~ c -:~ • • • • :> •
of c ~ - ;: "i. "i.
.. ~ ~ o I>. __ u
;; .~ 1>.110 ~ -"" >--
:= -' I>. C C .. E E 00- ·0 • .- " REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION • o • • ~ 0 I> ~ - ... -; ~~ c-
o U~CIt "..J til
CD __ o..J ~~ ~u
0 q I' I I I I Sri ,I yY101,f ~'(.TY ~of1NO --J \: I I -; I .
SO#1'tc fc .. C'-ytGCJd ! __ I! .j --- - ~Od.t,l'{Vl I 0 9 • -y-- . I I ! .r. .,
I 6 II ':'0. t/l'~ - '/ (vl#Ocd I II' : I i I I" , I ~ ---1" I> 0, I i ... • 1,1 f"" I ( " ~ , I ! Hv .: iJ!.. :.1,.. ..• v/.;; , S
, '.-' - ...... '.'''''I-'''t. rc :CI ~(): I I I I
...; Ii I"J r: cell.. e., i-J -+0 i 0k/ y I co eo "V'I jOPol ~ 1 I I (I.
Ihe'dly. lI"...,e c c "" Cc..l ire.( ! C) 00 0 i
+P---+ I I . Q 11 (V1D!~+
I!o' r~/."J;\f;t l. ... ( (I I.J.) r·T I - •
I Su I 'D (e. 0 L rOL .. ,,, I '" 0
I I brow,", ('.. r ~'/ ;!.~ I iD 10 i '0 c> (.1 1\ I I I ! I, t~
J I
10 o '"-, [\/1 I ~~NP , . . _--;
" , ~() I C6f;fSl(fe. rG~ Ie "If I .;' C' , t I ! !'Ol""e +t,.,,~ q(Ctd , ,,: ! . S I • 1rc;ce fb ~(),... ~ cltJ.,/ Ir
, ==fo, \A I !
Wc.{( - jt'r;r! rtf v .~,
I f'l10( s+ -0 ,0 c
AiDI H'/~o .. t;ulc' frP .,);>f:)O",,:/c-d
" 0 ,! ,"'~cI:y /, IV: f C eJi' r, rJ
-' '20
.;..~ " I If' f.:> 1"0> f.:r. 1(, /. I/uy l1Ol'rf tiS It
c ';" To to fry ;:. t. r. rocoJ'" F>/ I tl't-I"'-! ~,.owc, - J
". ,,-10 Note: tt-tlCC > ",bal-ltvlvl
c c' D fD " C' II I cClbl:.lr r
'- ", ,. \ "2~ , -' u 1,\ Ii
, l1Ct,.cJ GrAt.>t:LL Y ~AN/~
J:; <'." .II +roc e it/f. cu.d clt7y =r' It> 5W -" ~, ,-": well - !fG ded i sf
" .;;., ~.) ~ f c 1/: I (' re c(. f, ~ ( ! I ,
'1G . ,"' ~ ,: I
I . . ' ! J I /)10 15+
\ 'vf::,CII"'l(.;/~t to '(.)~ ro()""df'~ ',' " '" \/: C C fI" n· fr /
G ,; l:P (.vk/y I(~( " "
. II VlOJ.1 r/~rll" , , .:"~ very \ 7, \' j
! .(If'~ b t"Owz.... to ~tldl:~ I~ rt1t."t, v ;:1
..;;.,; " c,.j J. \ (Vote: !of"l' "'(Jd.()/~!. of - /e· ,~ ,." '\
fo \ {Wod. ce,(I.'1r .. +((-f(o{" L;, r
0 1 'DI " horcR No~: .'cit{ fJfrCtitt-fz., t,
c [l 1 \i cI C' rr(J~4 . (l'o('V" ff rCl "" tl c., ~ • "
\: , '-if)
~ co Ii , T'C.'" + fOe. tt ''---- ,
C ,:;': c~ .Ii IV ote: .ll;q I.+, dec ftC;! € I~ c ~
D' rf'OCJd cvt+L. df'FTl. " rc CJ 1! {Vo'f!..: h'occ Sl.obC,.,;L ,e; f
~ ... \ I I '-[:;- (::/0/ 11 1 I ! ('oSble ~
~/lNP I, , - !' I~ I \
(01<', clf'''c~ Ie. ArC! f/'C/ I X iDi V
--1' ' C'iLt' $o(l!t! c.l~y
. t!t>c ( " /1-r~, V \ : I IJ.''f' li- CI"orlr/ .J (' ,."1
3;'0 GROUND WATER . SAMPLE TYPE
HOUR DATE A - Au"., cuttin"s. B - Block sompl. S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tub •• ompl •• U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube .omple.
_1-jS~1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
1~1 CONSUl 'I1NG OEOTECHHICAl E_IIS
DEPTH
NONe
\
I
.. co •
i ~ ~ ::> 0 0 CO ~ .. ; .. .~
CO CO .. o • • ua.c:
.:: >-0 • .. ::> .. u CO ~ • • o "->-or! ~.o
0...1
- I'" ..: Q·t I -----j!--+! ---I!,f.---------., 0 Q --~---;--~.---'
bU - i ~ '" •. ~/' --,-10 " c~ ~__ i r---
I ,I i
5' r I~::::::~: w ., • t ----; ------i : s w ;:;; ,-:;' c ". I '
1-----11 0 ~' '.:. " ~ I i I-----ilv,c ~:i,: 1- . ) __ -,I -L I !
60 1----'1" ,,-V ' I ! J - i r i I
---I ! 0 11' I I j' I ---{ () I '0 r-tt-:-i----1r--+---+--J. I---! ,0 . 1 I I I 1_-----11 I QV ,j~l! I I
" ,'0 -t----rj---+---!----l , _ I-_~ Ie i 51\A ~"'..) IV\
I---l'- :0 I! I i : II I I
:, I 1-? I I '
70 1----1--' C \ptti-r-' -t-: --t-.I_+--I---I
1
!
J
! I
I I I l
I , I l ! L r :
1 I
J ,
. I r--r-, i i I I , I
I I \ i I I I I I I
! i i ! i
LOG OF TEST lORING NO. tv. ,: - 't"" I I, _
RIG T Y P E-;;-_-.:...f .... E-:Y~O-:,...,;-::-,c-:-:-;!'.r.f1~U~'::::'(~~)~5::-;:-______ _ BORING TYPE (.../2 11 pl/1 PW'EK: SURFACE ELE:V~.-~~~~~-C~~~--------DATUM
REMARKS
~ I • i "'" -(hOI $ T
very +II~ fo j,..cltl
\ ,
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
~ IJbCt_"~L-I~ t ("!ocf/y 11,.,..1: (~:""'(cj,tf"(/ VlWp'C; ,;" ~ ("w f?· I. b~U)(" -t:~) (rf"~";:;i. l.tr'!:'<l-t~
\: r Nc)~: ,(.;."" c p\. - ./,.. .. (~ = t1,;-~
c n ... n,-fc. i/o:" Y'(ote.: (\'lei f'1 "rrrv I.:. .J..c" I>c (1.(,
(!,_.~J r~~d, 1i'~:f:'~'C:~,-j:( I ,---.~~'
, pc. K" ,."t r~~c {~. I ~--·'--l·{"''''1 fV of.(.·; II-'.!'._ Z,'II'" ~ r t- / ~.
is .j+~ ~.~. -:' I ~ ~
{Vok: d ec..IC!;J C I'.., '1 r, lIe- I below IS;-I {tree c -rc (' "t1 - '" 'i.i.
{Vot.: SClkC(,; (i('C GlAfvlo m t;./.)~# p",~ I./((U 4c /C'IA.) It'(-I -
IVok.~ ro(l->e '/ (Go eI f(Of'1'I& --e'Z"ft. ~ht>,;f so r~ 0 f rtrt;. rl Off.!'C"S ,,,,ir: fff!t.. 1t,~dl.,..r- ro"lo is
""'COf'lrOs~tf .".&1 ~tr:'(; 1(.1 aci.L'" "I'~" f.,.f;.,,/I ... ~ -f, .... c.f .... 1 -r'r -;(;-1.:
{Vote.: #, -, ' e«Qs~ ...;., f . ;1' {:!. J --, -~ ,. Je.~~'::;Y("'Y 1-{...A v :H~_; ttl"'c • .,' I ,<.\ p"'
f'lo-(e~ rcdd15~ brow .... (:>e(ort} 16
Ft. rObb/f,
No~: Wk I Y 11(Yt, ~ t:t,~j!!t he(M".; '!.o f+ ~ -~ i-\~- f£. _... (;..-, + ~ C' (ay S V,-I'I
Hoi:.: irGc'C- C 1& y CiA c1. sott-r e
s Ilf ffof'l YO f-t. +0 ~ I ·N-. Not: C()i:>blc~ beloW 1 r- {f'
.. '- f uG d'Z I -h... Co"'$..,:. -I flee;. 0 f,_--
NO*-: .[o,.,.IS ore. .tllf/.d/y
/, VIe If' ~",J cle~ f'('" U' j" ~rc/;e( beloW 53 f-l.
('l()-e.: ('c»~,t1c.tc~f-e s,,+ 0",:/
c (a y bt:lr-,tu .r 9 (-I. !1{..7"Y SAND ~D(Lte t:fOy h'o c c fr IA e - 'I to'/ f'/ (, 1(,//- (,,f'crlrrl
GROUND WATER ----' SAMPLE TYPE _1-DEPTH HOUR DATE A - Aug.r cuningl. 8 - Block lompl. NE S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tub. lampl •• _'~'
U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube lample. I'" B I SERGENT. HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
PROJECT ~ Cc. - ,..,:. !'? I ( () p J. !: II J: LOG OF TEST lORING NO. /L-,p.-S;
--- . I JOB NO t=.87-f/- DATE f1A '(? 8' -~ RIG TYPE "TF't.(2MA ,PUR-OS
, ~
'-I l. /I pu<rr . .. ., ).. BORING TYPE [)1t:J . -.. ~ .. ~ ., .. o ~ - i:0 • 0- - .~ SURFACE HEV. • .. ., . "- -. 0 ).. . o- le 1.1. ~ 0 " ).. -o~ :; e U 0
0:- c -0 ~ .. .., "- .. - DATUM ~ ~ 0 0 " "- • 0 ., ~ = i .,,-= ., ~ - :E • • ...... ~ .... . ';
of ..... !! D. D. o ... -u ..... ~ -" ).. .. . ~ ~ ~ .. ... ., ., .. E E J!~~ .- 0 REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION • o .. • ~ 0 II II ~ .... o .. c-o UQ.cr: "..J OIl OIl ~-- O..J :fQ. ::::IU -
, I I I :. I c{"9vlcr -tv t;r./~{l"$vlcr i ,
I
==J .----' --r-- , i ,... 0,' ; I yv,'od!y((tlAt: (Crl"f't-.1-c,( t---.~;--~ ! i ! --
! j
"0 fd P.I. ----< .~~-
I i loc...~J -=1 ---t---i ..
,--------brc-v.'''' -1::- c, r6 yf ~~ L rou'" , ! , !
! ... I il \ !
, I Note' !O("le pocr-cl:. of
, , _ I r-- :
, i I I
.rtro 119 c e f"l(' I'I-r-c. -I lO~ -~ J I 1 I
__ I J i I ! I ,
I I i , . I , i i I I ) ----I
i I AUG£I( ITT 70 FT -----! STOPPt:(? ! I I (" As£ I.) HOc.lE W/7H -:'6 II 1 I I I ! cA[./NG
I , I i ! o (J1AI/'IEP r.C/::'/'flcl 7", ff'IU
~ I ! i I f'/C.,. ~ AT DG--PTHs 0'::- 10
66? f--I /
i 2r tJt-. c1 p{Jt...I.~P /lNO
! C'IH INt;,. I ilflc. K' ~Jt.(.£ D i Hot..£. Wf7H -, I I tv,q7 lUI; !.O((..
I I
I \
==1 I i I
I f I ,
i
I I i
! , !
I , I
I
j
i I I i
I I I ! I I i i
~ I i ! , i_ I I
- GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE OEPTH HOUR OATE A - A"g.' cuttingl. B - Block lampl.
S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. t"b. lompl •• U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. t"be somple.
_1-_1~1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
1~1 CONSUl ....... OEtmC>NCAL _ERS
0.Y • '~ .,., ( ), .r.,...... ~, •• ':"?.,...- C£>' i;' I.a.--, PROJECT ~LA.O:;:Y:c(?' I';, t~r '.' ~~~' o':-!-
JOB NO r:'"87 ..J." -,' DATE ---' r,,I 9 /87
..",~ __ F -1_ '_._.
LOG OF TEST'-IORING NO. MA-b
RIGTYPE ____ ~~_L'IJ~·~i·~~~~=~~~=~~~-------------------BORING TYP E _____ b. ... :;:;;...: .... :!_·_· ....:..l_ ..... ' .::C:.,.A _____________ _
SURFACE ELEV. ______________________ _
DATUM
REMARKS VISUAL. CLASSIFICATION
• ~ . . ~ .: o ~ • 0-~ II. -. 0 ;
~ ~c.z: c; I- ...... II. .. U
U II. • 0 .,
~ • • II • :i Q. Q. .. ~ ~ Q II. • _-0
II.D E E .!!~:; ~ .. ! 0 0 0 ~~
().J .All V)
CD __ Q.J
.. • .. ., • "' g~ u .E c
:> 0 0
of c .. • ~ ... ~
II. C C .. • ·0 •• 0 UQ.D:
0
GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE A - Au"., cuttin"s. B - Block aompl. S - 2" O.D. 1.3S" I.D. tube sompl •• U - 3" O.D. 2.42" I.D. tube somple.
-'-_I~I SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
I~l CONSUL T1NG oecmCtNCAI. _ERS
I DEPTH I HDU' I DATE I
r
LOG Of TEST lORING NO • .1)1- • .0
RIG TYPE ____ ~.~~~~7~;._r_-~~.-__ .~ ____ ~---------------------BORINGTYPE ______ ~~~~~~_~ __ '_~_:·_~_· _~~. __________________ ___
.: '; • II.. .. c •
" 0 u 0": c
... . ;; e SURFACE ELEV. __________________________________ _
.E of D. • Q
" 0 0 C .. -; .. ~ C C .. o ••
U·Q.III:
~ .. •• Q D.
... -.. JJ Q...J
'---1}/C /1., L_I ~_ _+!'I __ .' __ J :;:~ .~ i v /, ./t---,--i--- I J;, .-i / / . ---<I' I ,-----. I I ! V / (?; !, J
DATUM
REMARKS
---I/O / @S50?S-...:.,-"/---+i---+----I 5.5 1< / I'! : ;' ~ I !
! / [ r~-t---'-I -~I --+-1-----, . 0 ------.------1----+----+---·1
1 J ,: I i ----: 0 i ~--_r!---~----~----+--~
; ,.'" ~ ---'·,--.~..-:I~--+---+----l _.---; - // '/Is:-S .:0p~ 1
6C~ _-V /0:!-' --,-1---''---_--+ __ -1-__ -+-__ -1
__ --1 : /0./ . ..---+----+---+-----1 1----'1/ /0 ll--!'_';"'I ---+---+--__;---1
10
/ / I I. ---'1/ c.," ~SSO/.s f;;"
C::5 1---, c ,- .)r1 j ! ---1,/( < li--+-" --'-! --+--+--+-------1
1(l t ,vr ,I : __ """"::-J D i) i.,:, +_-'-I---'I __ ~_._._-_+_--+--_; I_~ ___ .,~" ) D j,;) i:e:=...s:!~/s I; I _
70 i I ~_+__+---+--_4---__;----_;
i I
I
i
1 I I
I I I I I I
I
! I
I I
I
i I
I I
rI i ! i I \ !
l I , I ! ;
, : I
GROUND WATER DEPTH HOUR DATE
i
SAMPLE TYPE A - Au"., cuttings. B - Block sompl. S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sampl •• U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample.
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
~?~ A~~~ E'69 ~.' 15d~~/~sede69//"
~k ~rt;'~~6tJ~: Co~ A:,~ W/~ p/U(.(.Iooo/
/ J 6"/9.
I -'@{11 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH 1 '" B, CONSUL TlNG O£<mC>tNlCAl ENOtNE£AS
.. • u..
.~
of ... • Q
.. c .. ~ 0 u o :: c ~ 0 0 c ~ ~ .... . ~ c c .. o ••
UQ..Q:
~ )
15 1--11
llr t-----l
! iii ! iii
I
~.s Lo{3Jrl
.... ~ ~
.. u c ~ .. ..
Q ... ..... ' ~.J:J
Q..J
LOG Of TEST lORING NO. __
RIG T Y P E __ ---.C--"'-h--'-'F-_-_,,---?'r"...,.-r~-_-~J: .,......."r.-~-...,l-----BOR I NG TY P E ______ ~_..;..,_---'r..:..I,,_-_'_c:..._. ____ _ SURFACE ELEV. _____________________ __
DATUM
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
L.j" J c;; ~ /J -I,;;'
,/)~ -I C' A?,-'{'< ,,'-, , I
(!: I C', j')(':p
11k/;; lr"'c C-I Jc/ ./,;. /%_,? ,-..,.-,-.J
.{.o""-.' r-~ !...._.L ;"::$Je.:"'"'..1,...,
!:-ArJDi GLA 1 SC'A/"lj IS rfr/ /: /]c-
(1J~jcZ/C; 1-& L.ovJ P:
/;,r)r... - (<7--'".)"",/
j.f 6/2L/..-'?,
1; H:;; ...!:.A"",Q /~;I'lA:: -I~ ~"rrli(.',. Cre. ,,,,..-,,/
't.l'1b 1:":Jf" c...,-J.! /'V.f'. !..t f-/v"vl'1
L;tI\JJ) Y CL A ';'" -r;-e\ (fi? Ii,..,c .5 I ~ v~ r
5'1{/ J.:. .!:, rJe +_, Mr'/ 6 ""1 i~ NIDc/0 I/"'r- CIV'l-l(1
Low r-; /,.f e!' C' "V /'I
r/? WIt i l ;.."Pj/ IV / It-, --+,--,1---+---+---1----1
V\ »""\ ,r-4-~~I~i-t-i----~I----+----~----1
>0 r-______ ~i~i~! ____ ~I ____ ~ __ ~ ____ ~ ____________ ~ ______________________ __ GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE
A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" I.D. tube sample. T - 3" 0.0. thin-wall.d Shelby tube.
_1_ jS~1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
1~1 CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS -- t - PHOENIX' TUCSON • AlBlJOUEROUE • SANTA FE • SAlT lAKE CrTV • El PAS
DEPTH HOUR DATE
PROJECT fL1A1C I C<;) Of £Sc... f~,c2
LOG OF TEST lORING Nofl1A ~/o JOB NO. E- B~: (I DATE 2/ 7M/ ss
~i RIG TYPE ____ ~~~~~~~-~~~-'~~~~-------------------BORI NG TY P E_-L.h_' ""7'~ZI-2",--'_' H.....:....:....:. -::...(.:..... _4:..,.. _______ _ ~ ~ c >-
~ e ~ c o ~ ~ c ~ .. cO 0 c 0-
)0 • 0_ • " c: • Q. -. .,
~ " U 0 ~s ~O.c
SURFACE ELEV. ________________________________ __ u.. .: ..t: n. • O
" 0 u 0'., c " I> ., C ~ • .. .. .~ c: c " o • •
UQ.Q:
, -----~-.....:.
i -------1
! ----I
'0 U
~ d. .. ~ 0
t}..J
)0
l- t> CO) Q. '; U C ~
.... 0 c ~ ~ i -0':;:: • .. c> t> ., .~ ,,-" ~ Q. Q. ~ - "'0 o Q. OjU .:.;: WI
E E ..2~~ )0 ,,' '0 ~ .- .,
0 ., ~-" c-VI VI
co __ O..J 2;Q. ::>u
L_J_ u~--~-=-L-==-_~:~.;Z -(----.~---~.----' _ .. --: i; : -l_~ __ ~_ .. ___ ~-.-_ .... _____ .--~-----
!j·T·--l -_-+---r--"-
~ i-~ {fJt1~---··j-··---\ ! I Ii; r-:---r·--.-·--,·-·-----~··---·-
i I I I ! ! r-~; -----.-t-1_'--_·_-f---i---;---~~1~2L~':~L-t. -l ; _~~-1 _____ 1 ___ :~ _____ 1_~ ___ . l--i-.J.--l-~--....J---
-----. L....:_~ ---+---1---;--b> I ~ «:::; r C' r I ~/J "\: 1
~ __ J C~I---:r=-~JJ.2--L-i-. -t=.~~ i r- ,I I : ; =-. --4--r,cs:iu1 zo~L£'bj 7[.Jf:--!==-.-.. I, i 1 I l
7- t~ : LI l-i ----~-~---lj--, ------c'- . _. : tv" '~-''''''';'---''''''''----+------"l .r 1. J' rt'<e>v"}I' :,,,/'l ,
DATUM
REMARKS
, (
1'Jc: ~~r_·~T-t(?:-.. .....;l!r----.L---------:---1 1/ ! !, /'1.- / / __ ~I L-J '-' (J/'::; r/,,/C'
it ,_~!~~ ____ ~ ____ ~----~------I 1---; r , ____ ,',' I : ___ :-___ -\'--____ :--. __ -\ ',--:--r '
1 ___ ' iii I ! ii'
~:; 1---1' ~*Srr--(--rJ.
.../ I i I /'
II rl ~'--~--~---~----~---~ I i
'--~I ; , !..--J--~-----+_--~---J----_4
\ I'
r;2<::' 1---: (/ ........... ,------1
... I I . j.
I
rf" r /'1 ~-i-._+---+.:..---t--___I!__--J iJ-~r ,"f _ 0.': ~c rr.
C:KI---: ,/
i2J JA"t'f.5'
!--,......---+:S==--1i..::~::..O~{ f~f/j-:.;-~:-./lc..') _-+ __ -+-I ____ I/-ZZ S~ v8S -
I I
I J I J
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
---S1--r c l).;./r c:. ..... ~, "i.~.,·- ___ ,'",. ... ~
.f/rr--; '? 7'- gOb If'
fI?~~J6r ~ 5~', ioV ~ ~",,../ ?:- (·l ":- -.~., ~ ...
I I---i
/~~~~-L~~ __ ~~--~------~--------__ --GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE
A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" I.D. iube sample. U - 3" 0.0.-2.42" I.b. tube sample. T - 3" 0.0. thin-walled Shelby tube.
DATE _1-
jrMl SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKW
1~1 CONSlilTlNG GEO'll'CHNICAL E"""'EERS - 1 - PHOENIX· 'tUCS0f.4 • .-.t.SUOIJEAOUE • $.ANT" FE • SAll LAKE cm
~r3 LOG OF TEST lORING NO.I1;4-/D PROJECT .'/MtC. ) {D /;.1 .££ c. A
JOB NO F'!ICi,-1! DATE 2::2 -;: Ar-j S c.., RIG TYPE CCt,E- 7.> BORING TYPE J;/'2)/ /il4
• • IL .. c • :> 0 u 0';: c :> II II C ...
SURFACEELEV. ____________________________ __
c
of D-• o
~ .. .~ c c .. o ••
uc..c:
--~_J ---~~
I
Jt 1---1
DATUM
REMARKS
~ So :::o({;ll) j r--F- 7r----lI----+------l
-tJ I I R) I ---+-I-~I-·-~
1---l---~-_4I_-~I_-__j nil , I
I ! i I I I i j I I Iii
I I I r-=s 1.9'01:-9
IJ!· I
SAMPLE TYPE DEPTH HOUR DATE A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample
{lJJN(., S - 2" 0.0. 1.3S" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T _ '" n~n. thin-woll~d 5h"lbv .ub~.
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
/) of-€ ; 1" .J /0. Or:;7 -10
C/r,'-j ~? SjdCJ )"
3,..::> I"?t:'S e>, .(1- rt /0$;
...L.. (Vl,dl"", C r« {"7//
(V-; t?d 1,/ Ie' ~7.:t C,...., -+ cJ
Lo"-l/ ?/~ S),i c ;-'7
U Gr'.0'" Il
_1-jS~1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWIT
1 ~ I CO!<SUl 'IlNQ GEOTECHNICAl ENGINEERS - 1 - PHOENIX· T\JCSON • ALBUQUERQUE· SANTA. FE • SALT LAKE erN • El
.. • u..
.: .; Q.
• o
.. c: " :> 0 " o ';: e :> '" '" r: .. -
-,: ... ~ c: c: ..
'" " " Uo.o:
, :
----1 ----1
C- --=i ~----1
-~
/0 ~ --I
I
)5 ------J! ---1 ---,
?o_~
I
liS
HOUR
I /..J
LOG OF TEST lORING 'No.dlt-,
RIG TYPE CLl2E-7S. BORING TYPE G I//) 11,:-";..{,4, SURFACE ELEV. ____________________________ __
DATUM
REMARKS
f
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
OA~:r !:rlr V'~ f':y .. '~! /:';'/~ j!/" ,/1 ,',J
f.-; n.z /' C r '5 r;o' 11 -I LD0 f>j~: fie,,:!?
i3 ( :>,....;I"!
£,flrJDl'" CU1Y r
~~ /"1(// i~ .{; "'C;- ./- r"" .., ,.,:.
,r'?",,/v r: Ji.> I,"'-'r?.- ,,,,'f -Ie I J-~~'/ L, r,../ t"';:
Lf' (2,-,,-"""'r'7
CLA f'bT .5:./riO '-
pr<J I " ..,,.,..
I, , """ e. r! r',..:, '" -,J
??,,-,J ..,.,. /'I,~ """ U Q I ::?~~,j'J /""-S-~-IV---#
.... 1------_·
l I I,
SAMPLE TYPE A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sampl" S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sampl". U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T - 3" O.C. thin-walled Sh"lbv tub .. ,
_1_
lrs.7l' SERGENT, HAUSKINS & I
-l~' CONSUL TlNG GEOTOCHNK;A!, ENGII -- t -.. PHOENIX· 'tUCSON • AlBUQUERQUE' SANTA. J:"E • So
DATE
.. • U.
.!: or;
c.. .. 0
WI t: II
6 .~ 1,1 t:
:> " " t: ~ -; i .~ t: t: WI 0 • II
un.o::
I
'=J ._---( ----:=]
» ==:J I --=1
&v ! --.-~ --'-1 ------,
br; ! ------/ -----1 ______ .. J
[ I j 1
i I I 1 I I I
GROUND WATER DEPTH I "0""
DATE
/---\ -.. /·iA; .... -
LOG OF TEST lORING Nolli ~/I RIG TYPE (/):: ~ 7 S BORING TYPE G 'I: I/.~ f.. !1 SURFACE ELEV. ______________________________ ___
DATUM •
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
- o. -, e j <.' ,o-~,. <~ '" ( v _
("-''/ ~ Ir .. ..,,, c,,-'" { ./
I.., ,I --.,.. /v. r: Y t;8 /<.0 1../ ""'7
I I SAMPLE TYPE
A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube somple. T - 3" O.D. thin-walled Sh~lbv tubpo
.. • u. r:
£ Q. • o
5
.. c • " 0 V 0 .. e " to I) C ~ •
-:: .. .~ r: r: WI o • •
UI1.D!
.. ----1 I
-----)
~-=i I -I
---;
/DI __ i
!
I f-S--1 ~=-=! I , -_.,-,
- .. ~ 61...-"'1--_1
j 1---
i
... . . " .. " c: ~ II> ~
0'" ..... ' ~.J:j
0..1
~.s 2''iS-r-! !r'1V1 . ~ '~---.q -i---, -----::;; -7- - -
: ;-'~---~----i ---~-;- --_. __ . : - -~-~;-- .. -~~---- .. , "-------~----:----.
~ I I \
I .1 ~o ( 1'/2)
I I I j I I
LOG OF TEST lORING NO.#J-/ RIG TYP E __ -=C::::.....:.../'7~.c"---_7L-.~::::.:-~ ______ _ BORING TYPE ____ ~6~/r/~7~1I~~!~-~r,~~~f~-----------------, SURFACE ELEV. __________________________________ _
DATUM
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
, I A ... .cV (" f·":;" L-l-/'" {......" --
~ A"NQ,~ r; 1 e j ~,r /!. (./;V,.A..I (t/A. {"'"
wI!';! It-.,., crll / t., ... .,1 r..:- Lr {:.' /t> v-./ h
SAIl/..} Y cL..4 V
/ ' -4;'::-' LelA? r..!. /7 ~C /".?e .,J/,,../.
j"l/."'l/"'/'-'.I& /.-.[ C-'-', F
1 C'I.-." ,£'::;. L r' /":' .. - ,F' '7
~ f-rl C; I(' a /J "f (.,/1,!..,'C/'i"· r. LJ-c ~/)/
S4?J I;;' r-.,,,,.c:: G,. '" /4£'J r7~~ ~ r,''''' C' c"..., -1&/
Lr ""./ r..:: L ',.!.. ~ ,o~ ....
GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE DEPTH DATE A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample
5 - 2" D.D. 1.38" I.D. tube .ample. U - 3" D.D. 2,42" 1.0. tube .ample. T - 3" O.D. thin-wolled Shelbv ."b~,
_1_
1~1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BEC
-1~1 CONSULtING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER' -- ,- PHOENIX' TUCSl:)III· AJ....AUOUfAOUf. SANTA FE' fJJ. T LA
HOUR
PROJECT .sye~I'{D",(/~I(.f;", ~ s..-r:.--/ ?//;/~I' JOB NO {;1:78-/( DATE /q' :s ,4"113';'
f11-/: /r':-c : LOG OF TEST lORING NO. 1"7/-1
.. .. u..
.: -E ... • o
7S
. ~ ~
o ! ~ ~ 0-
WI C • ... -: 0 ~ .!! u ... ~o..c
D .... ~ ~ g-o p c ~ " " u .. • c " p 1: .~ ".! Q. Q. .. Jl " ..... ~ -.., c c .. 2 0
E E ~~= 0 • • " " u~o: ~..J '" '" al_"s
i t I !
I ---Ll i t
i I'r- I 1 'I -t I, I I
~ \ I
I I j I I j I
1 I
I I
i I I I
==i I ! I 1 ! " I
I ! i I
I I
t I
I
p; c ~ ~ .:: 'Co
.t ,; 0-U 0 .. u ~ p c ~ ~ i ., ..
0 ... pU .. ..... '0 ~ ~Jl o..J ~~
i I I
\ I I
I I I I
I I
.
c 0
'0 '0 '" u ""t''::: • 'M
.;: ... .- " c-~u
RIG TYPE L/7E -7> BORING TYPE C.J L-, (l4,i..Z, . SURFACE ELEV. ____________ --------__________ _
DATUM
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATIOt-l
aA i bY S ,A/1I' P
F,'/I(t: 1..? /lp //v. 'I GrclI'/I,../ tJk'& ~ t'1~/!y /'r;7 ~ C .,1/
~...."j f'Z il I(:/';;>o.-~..,
~ ,... A (' -1. I 7')'/'/ . -, -', ~ "'I/Ct· .> ~
~~~/~..,.. rel""~"J >3'llp ~
C"V, ~ ft? 66'
I
III I I I GROUND WATER
DEPTH HOUR DATE
t)(i a..
SAMPLE TYPE A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample 5 - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. lube sample. T _ 3" 0.0. thin·walled Shelby lub~.
_1-lrs;:/jl SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
-1~1 CONSUlTING GEOTECHNIC>.L ENGINEERS - f""""" PHOENIX' TUCSON • ,\l8UOUEROUE • SANTA FT • SALT lAKE CITY • £1 P ..... c:
LOG OF TEST lORING NO/lflt-L:.. - ,
RIG TYPE ~~ZS ~; , . II II C ... BORING TYPE_ dl.? "/.is. A . ~ II ~ II •
C • o • - 'Co 0 .. 0- SURFACE ELEV. • WI c: II A- -. 0 ... . 0_ je II. " 0 u
... _'O..r .; e U 0
o ~ c '0 I- 11M A- .. ~ DATUM .E " 0 0 U A- • 0 C • ~ i .,,~ .. .! .. II
of. C • ~ :E .. .. oS> • o A- .~~
., .~
" .... ~ A-",
A- ~ _"0 ..... ' .:; ~ A- C C WI E E .E~~
.- 0 REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION II 011" ~ 0 0 0 • oS> o II c-O un-a: "'..J 11'1 11'1
cO __ O..J ~n- ::lU
I ~Si.LLI'~~ ! _ Lei-_ f)? ~(1-JOY C!lly -----i ----J ' '0' I I I r~-j? /: r '" ~
./~ /~/r, f,' v"'? r --,---1 ----1----<-------- (-,' ?c c~/.,. ~'., ;e. I ~ ~ \ \ I --~ i /_0/ ".s-- l ;-
! - I I -l--~-- fr.:1 I :"r --- i---rj--- , I P ('--7 leVi r'~ .s
~ IDsf~2{f6 I
,:?/;J "- J..t r::::: r .::>"11 '" 1----
I 'i--t-~-~t.71 J== -Sr1,--JoY c/~v 1-+---1 ' 1-/ ~J I : I j r/PC /" /' "2"';::; i,., ,. '\ Pc.
JD I I I I I I I 0.:>c15 /;<7(2 Cr(""t'('/
I p;Tr ! :: '-"0f~3 i fV- f?c/,,,~~ , rZ .!.,.,it C r ~~ ""7 '?-c", -----,
i --
-~ I-L+--- ;70-1 e: in cr (?c. z; ",? S-I vO, ---1 I ' ! IT-, \ , i r," ,.,./-t!' /II -. ( /./ 10 '
--] I
IS I I' I I I sc 00) /-I .. rc/ CillYf'( Cds \ c- L'!i v) 5 t1,/IIP I I j I -1 I--TI-~- 21? t
1-; /7 e ..f/?..rO/""',", 6r~ , ..... -1' I /,_C',/oc+!p- crle/ ! ! I I ----i
1--1; i "-+--i~~~ Dr' J} f-I",c/ /"Ie! P/?£-!;c,'Jy {-/ (j lo""?
20 -----1
-~ OOSI2;,Zi'i.;6 I 1 S i)l;;; .5:,),119 T
! I! r 6~ I I
I I - r I" . I.- ('-J~,./",-. ,.9/p; ~ I !" j ,
! (P .. /', "l" ' 'l"
I 5c- /J/? J/vrJ ~ i/C" -.,4 --~ tl .. 1<-11'00042"' L ,I, : <'Ie? ~
;?S I ","- /'I, f". i·/ ,E /-::-' / /) ) t' I ! i ! -, ~. I ()C?-l~ ; i ,') ( ,
C~""t'l (3.e 5';'cveJ ~r'S' I ~ i
r. +- :1-/6 "-2'2'" i ~ ~1 --r I I i , I
i I i --=1.1 tI;4'1,5Y SANO
)~ I i ! I i I
~/.r) Fr'l-c.. f) r,,/;v.., I ! I I ! I I --....,
I
! I /7.>,ju('"J..j {.. f7 f./ L,p .... pz~ .... , I !
I j l_f_L I I Cro? .... " 1-/ {' •. ,;~J,;; L C:,.-~s. I C:o{ll'/z"} I I
It' I I , 1/ /lC'i~, (" C"r-. ,!. , :::("': I) C"' I
.>- I I , th r .(,f,v ?c" fe.., Y2~ - /}c- "" ~c/ c; ,.. ....- ..-'
I (1~l.(:
r ' s~"." I
CCC.(~·.,,~;
I ~ >0 (2 ") CI f1 0' 47' 70 £2" lto I
I aa::l 5 ><1 (zit '')
1;s I I . ! I
~-l ~51 ~'" (>"'j I >0 I i I I I ;
GROUND WATER SAMPt~E:;TYPE'c ~ __ DEPTH " ~
A - AUII .. ltings. B - Block sample S - 2'JJ 1.38" I.D. tube sample. U - 3''''':' •• 2.42" I.D. tube sample. T - 3" 0.0. thin-walled She Ibv 'ub~_
HOUR DATE _1-jM' SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWIT
1~' COOSUlTlNG GEOTECI<N1CAl ENGINEERS ~ t - PHOENIX· TUCSON' AUlUOlJE"ROUE· SANT,A. FE • SAlT lAKE CITY· E\
'i • WI c: • LL. ; .~ u c c:
:> " " ~
c: ~ ~
''= ... ~ "" c: c: WI • o • • Q Ut:l.1t
"0 u
.:e "" ... 2 0 ~..J
LOG OF TEST lORING NO~ -/j /' I/,:;:- - 7_::-
RIGTYPE __ ~C-=Z'/ __ -~~~~(f~~~/~.~> ______________ __
BORING TY P E ______ (:-_''-/-::~· ____ ~=__.;..".:..._'....:.:...-______ _ SURFACE ELEV. ________________________ ___
DATUM
REMARKS
[)~ f-It-. r J 17 c-IrP,' CI c{J t'/ v!(,y IS;" /":,, (".I."" (,
.,.- J . /. ,~.' A~,.!""'r'" r"1 .. -::(r f ,;..::-.
/
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
~I'>/ ' ~ /+ ... ,/ ;,'''JC
cr-,Icl
751=~!~H~i ~j ~! ~li~!~~ .... --......~ .. ~_~_ 1_.-= t rr l: I : ..... "~.-- t.~;::::::=:::::::::::::::::/J====C===-===I'=/==·-:==.
I r-f I ' I fJ,..r. (, .....JJ~T/7C., 1_ ......J i /
(!.' I I. I I/'/ (" £7ICJ' I' <!'" -1-,,: "'-,.' 1---·1 :! I I ~~~'2"
! I i
I j I I I
I I I i j !
--i I I I I
I
I ,
I , I I
I j
I I ! I I
I
GROUND WATER DEPTH HOUR DATE
(V oNf
SAMPLE TYPE A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. r - 3" 0.0. thin.walled Shelby tube.
_1-jS~1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWr
I~I CONSUlTING GEOTEC>*I1CAl ENGINEERS - t --- PHOENIX' TUCSON • AlBUQUERQUE· WIT'" FE • SAl. T LAKE crrv •
;0- /c;F :5 r' .
PROJECT 41?/zonrr S">'c. JOB NO G1?}?-I/ DATE 17 z'i/ f?
LOG OF TEST lORING NO.t7It?-a /.J 12 4oc. ..-- GI"9I'?/.)I'1E - c-NI/G: /
.~ RIG TYPE . ~ -6~"" rfl,e. /Zor~l'Cy
* • • c ... .. BORING TYPE . . ~ . ~ c
148"0.r 10 '" I .. o ~ .:: to 0 • 0- SURFACE ELEV • • .. c • .. -. " ... . 0_ ]8 u.. ... ~O..l: - :> U 0 US(i;JS 70PO ~.~ ~ 'ii .... • M ..
OM U • • DATUM . ~ :> " "
u • • ... 0 i • ~ i 1~ of c .. - :E a. a. ..,I) .. 0" ·u
'. ".! ..... ,- ... ti .. ~ ~ .. c c .. E E 00= '0 C .- " REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION • o • • l! 0 " " - .... " c-
o UQ.~ ~..J II> II> 10 __
O..J ::IOQ. ::>u
0 / 5/' m~/:sr SA/JDI' /-Jred. ;;;--_. 1\1 1 .- ro /7J,t)/~ r 5/-'"..-"01./ j/ar. -10 :S~/)LJ)' - J -"- -
\ cJ -I $)..:..r ,,1 SIL-T'1 Srir7()/ • \ 111L -'6
5 it \ I i' 'II.. t:='«~, ;1/t"""d-C'c..Br-CC
li V " j/. $/ ~,.-,c/ ~ ?J-' {:-?Y'c 0 , ...... l\ Ii "" "- II 1?J~/~r s/.(6~;.r?- $46r nd,...
/0 l'" i\ pCLa~1 \"\ \ /YI/- :s 7 /"~e crrJ,.t~ ." \ / /,:..1
///-:;; ~ I trw P / /~ . l:' X j. 1- ~ .::;; ,/ ,
\. !fJ If 6r. ~Q 1-/ nd-=I-? br, IS p') 1 ~G7O) ~' \ i 1. ~()I')S· /'
-~ \ I' ---I);;J , ~ :\0' c.-;: .,::;, r;/~d ~ A --- ;;--- Gro~~/~1-' z.c.
11 ~ O~F' ~ sc:-nd -f/ ;t;.,.. -1 - I w/ I?CC.::!
v ~ ,..... /YJL 51"~'ve~ It/-IS.) i\ ,. t Sf - 46/ j/C?~. /f'-')' ff \
e~
\7 /?IC';' ;"'()c:h:.. ;J'1/::>c"::,, I
('.j ~- ~
+ /\ . \ ~. ~'~~
~o 1,,1 \ /1£ ' C"C' "C/ ..
I/~r 'rr I~k- ( Con,c.r.:::1: \ \i 11 ,
.1~ I C;;..~r/.~,JV~'" --"" (\ \
36' ~.
\l'
.. ~ \ ! L. "'-p-..... \. , --1\
40 \
. A -\ \ ... A Kill ;" \
4~-': t-,- \
~'l' *' [),.., -/1 rc!¥ I~ ... \ ; ~) ,,~ ,.." ,',,,IA .,tes-/
\~ .~ ,
OJL ~
, \ ~Ct-r ' \
'-.l , 50
\ GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE I
10m
" I "OOR I om I A - Auger cuttings. B - Bloc~ sample 5 - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube .ample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tub •• ampl •• T _ 3" 0.0. thin-wall.d Sh.lby tube.
j[!H;l' SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECK'
1 '" B I coos<>-T .. O OEOTl'CHHCAl ENGINEERS - t - Pt-tO£NlX·WCSON·M.Bl.JC)(J(nouEoSIIHT",rEoSA.l.1 LAKE 0
, GI*'?I'? ()r7 e - eN 1/&"/2 / oc. .i RIG TYPE , ~ -5 ~ # r?1,e. /Zo rl9rLY
* ~ ~ c )0. BORING TYPE -. ~ . . ~ o ~ . 'Co c Z;j Po =t: /Q/ I .. • 0- - 0
SURFACE ELEV • • I>. -. 0 )0. • o- j'S .. c • .; B U 0 u.. :> 0 u )0. ""o..c: US($S 7~PO .!: 0" c: ;; to- • M ... C ~ . - DATUM :> 0 0 u • .! I>. • 0 •• ~ ; 1~ of
c ~ ~ :E ~ "JJ ~ 01>. ;u
--= .. .~ ..... I>. . -." )0."
;: W'l ... C C .. E E 00= '0 • •• 0 REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATIOH • o • • f 0 0 Jl - .. 0 ~JJ c-o un.1I: ~.J II'>
10 __ o.J :::En. ::lU
I' ·PROJECT 4/?lzon~ S',>C JOB NO ~II DATE I/zg-)Ry
LOG O' TEST lORING NO/?7~-1
t< LJ 4
50 ._t;-f¥-
.:5A/JL) / t/r!?r. ';0 SI<-1/J{)Y ~. j
S~ Sjt..{ If" SI1..71 ~r!I/~\ -
"'" \ r t/. 65
"
(c~;7~W. ) i:. ~V 0()/~T " ./ Se-me. .)0 tCc:>r;:: I '\ 'A 111' /J ~ .; e ! c;;-1"~r1 W /IY Y" /n::: tI ~ \
.c-r:::. -~o - I S,..A:>n c/, ... / ~/ ~~e..
V ,I, C?C'C If' S . ;;; , :3 ~~l'!; vC J. r 1/\
I " &;;- 50-70; &5-c?O/
" 1\ ! y '16 -100 I
I~~ V liT " IA '" 70 ,
/)~/~, Sl~#ed c?"!/-a , ;t r-! 11 ,\ 1\ ,.
",., 1/26 /8S@loa /' ,
r- II 75""
, ~ E,n t:L) t/' r; -Ie' If!f rtf:' d [\-. ~ / /'.. ,. .' l c:.. -/0 J \ ,/ ~. tl -C'ul-y (';tf·, .
'" y '" .A/ll e7xce .c.:.~' ve /'" c: I .... ··.. r! r:'i
l' - - <;"
~o ~ / \ ,6.-f q5~ -- fv 11
X I' ~ r'l~-k,. ,If; IF_
4 C--C ~',rl -r 06'~ '."1 .... - ~ /// ...-: / -/'.!'"-c,S .. 1\ .. l (!": 0' / r.;; (" r:' -
('\.J \! ,"\.... ~ I~ -SP
"--
/J~/e: 6'ore.hok d~,-"H~~ 90
Vi 1\ r')1~/ be "'-r~vla~~ s ,
r' 1\ I 11
" V I- I'-- ....." -/0 CCVr ·rt4 belou..::> 90,....
V f\ ' 'l.- e?>;:> ~ .,t;!.o r>7 90 /- /061'.
'fs--~ , ""' 1\ * D,.,·II role '....) \; ,:'" ,.",.,.,u-les-/
~ I;": t:'""'..A
\ Iloo.Jr .,4"r , /PD GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE _1-JMI SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
1~1 CONSUlllNG GEOTECHNICAl. ENGINEERS -.... t ~ PHOENIX· rucSON • ALBtJOU(ROUE • SAN1 A. FE • SALT l»'.E em'· rt PI\SO
.,:,L. r;;:- .r; r; J ".- I. /.. , ,-'
r'V ... P ROJE cT--,....!..A~I?~/~2~o..::.-n~~-!.--,.=.S-=>-;--c.-r=-:-:-____ LOG 0' T ES T lOR IN G NO o_/1_IIf_-JOB NO. ~II DATE 1/ -Zq 799 .", /1 /1 ."" / A"""
.. * • .. I: • II-" 0 u
.!: o 'Z c " 0 "
of ~ --.. .. .~ 0. ~ ~ .. • 0 • • Q UQ.Q:
/00
----1
'Vi /30 1-\.,--1
;; u
:c 0. .. ~ a
(!).J
1401--~
1\
>- • .; 8 ~ -II ..
Q 0.
t-i Q.J
RIG TYPE GI"9/'1, ... ,d1e,< - "...leN I/Gi'/'C. ~~ ~~ BORING TYPE 6 ~ # r1lte ;eorl'9~Y ~~ -.~ SURFACE ELEV. 14,¥D ?' /0/ I
~ ~ j'8 DATUM US~s 7c:>!=>o ~ • 1~ .?~ ::; M
·c~ -1~ :JU
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
oS I'::J /) ~ )""C~.)"" . -It? H--I-+-Il---j----I---, ----
-Z S / ~ rIA' 5/? 1'7/.J oft" ~,,/,/J!) J If 1\ J V I
I
[\ \/ A P-
It-:- -+---;---+---1----/
!t -1---4-----l---f---l
A;'" 1/
"\ 1/
I \.
\
f".A I ...
SI.:..rC~H7':.J )
J~"C:' r. 2;/'1 ,h~"?C"'-. // '-. I'>~./t:: ~~i/eh::,.J l'l.,.V tI~dc;-/1~"'-f. ~":)./ I
'. U/1/,1C? G6..~h-l-1 Z'5~ _. ~ \ t '~'l /,.,,....,,~J-/r ./ ~ 1 /.1- ~~,£Jr()K"rr/' /t--_...._/ .r.> :' ~ 1/' -J---f.--1I--i-- /:;>,c.6sb!y ;'-/"for, F C/'C'
I.{ S~~. t',,--~ 1/ ,~l h\·-'!:-l-+I--.f---+--~---I1f D,.,,/I role. p,qr;t:.tor1;'·::-/2r'JTt~-:--~') ). t" ,.~ ,..., /t1u -Ie$'/ \ ...... h,'t1\ ~--t---f---I---I ~(j -t- C Co;-? / /./:J
v~/~~~~ __ ~J~~~ __ ~ __ ~ __ ~ ________ ~ ______________ __ """'-'" GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE
A - Auger cuttings. B - Block .ompl" S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sampl". U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T - 3" O.D. thin-walled Shelby tube.
PEPTH HOUR PATE _'~' SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWIT! I" B I CONSUl TOIO OEOTtCHHICA1. ENOINEERS
- ,- PHOENIX. nJCSOti • Al.,BUOVEFOJE • smT A FE • SAL 1 tAXI CrT'!' • El
p. ~ pI
r' .. p ROJ ECT=-=~,4.-:....:../z'.:....:/:......!Z!::::=:..O:.:..-n!..-.,4-=-----r-5'_S"'_c.-r=~____ LOG 0' TIS T lOR IN G NO. n If - / JOB NO. €ES'-II DATE / / ZC!f /I?Y /1 /1 -", A
RIG TYPE GI"'9/1 ()rJ e,< - '-IaN 1/tGi"/C. /~oc.
• • u. c
..c Q. • Q
* C .. • :> a u o ~ c :> 0 " C ~ ~
''; ... ~ c: c: .. a • • uc..o::
! ,
J 17 ~ I ..; I
t
/90 ' •
. i ~ BORING TYPE -5 ~,,~/,e. ;eo r-"9t't y g~ -.~ SURFACE HEV. I#foljc::/ I
.:: .. . -" .. u c ~ e e
Q Q.
u o ja ~ e ~ '" ~ DATUM U,?<P S 7C'Pc> ~ i •. ~ ;U = M
'0 ~ 'c .! ::E c.. :l U
ti Q-l
1/\ I
J
~\ /_. I \ ,
If ',--+---t--~--~-I 1\ .l,...,-l--l----I---jl--- ---I
A f P ,-+--+---+--1---1
\ ~+--1-----1---4--~~--1 \;' /
D;-. --4----1---4----1
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATIO~
~-~----~--~~~----~----~--~----~------------~--------------------------.- GROUND WATER
DEPTH HOUR DATE SAMPLE TYPE
A - Auger cullings. B - Block sample S - 2" 0.0.1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T - 3" 0.0. thin-walled Shelby tube.
-'-jS~1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
1~1 CONSUlTING OEOTtCHNC'I. F""INEER! - 1 --- PHOENIX' TUCSON· Al8UOVEnouE' SANlA FE· SA.lT lJtJ<E em· El PAY)
JOB NO. Glf!?-/! DATE 1/ 7::; 12ir' G~/?.or; e t< - /.Jl:,v 1/6~ /4OC
~i RIG TYPE , ~ 6~""" rfl,e. ,tZOr~~y
~ ~ ~ c: >- BORING TYPE
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c: I .. o ~ ~ cO 0 1420 r/o~ • 0- SURFACE ELEV • • .. c: • ... -. " >- • o- j] U. " 0 u
>- ... 'O..c :; e U 0 US($S 7~PC> '0 ... COM ... CO ~ DATUM . !: 0'.;' c .... 0 co • ~ i l~ " " " u • • CO co
o£ c: •• :e D. D. ~.&J • o 0.. ~U ~ ... ~ ..... .- ... >-'" .~ ... .::: WI ... C c: .. E E 00= .- " REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION • o •• !! 0 " " - ... " • .&J o CO c-
O UIl.a:: ".J V'I II) cD~_ O.J ~Il. ::>U
r ~ ... PROJECT LOG Of TEST lORING NO.fl')/('-1
lza:,- ~ . ., ./" ,~-
ttf r-- ~)r7 ?l-o/'r,Jt.~'/':'" /y / (:::;.
1--- I .-. .; / i \ Ii Iff CC c,)r't. 'rv. "J
-1/\
'.
Zto" \ L \ , l3eblZoc.l:: (.~ ) \~ IV. IH -j: / G'K~r-;l/ /c. / )"/, -.n;' ~ Ci
rJ?rr, ,/ / .,:/ r ~ 1" u: .; / Z'1r;; f..'./-:-- /;:£ 1"-',<,- ___ /; ''7/
-I ( .. ' .. .-. --;,"'" " ~., .'
,
.--- -
,-_. -'-- " --- - i-
RErqSED ON BED/Zc;C,/, ';, f- - "-
012 ~/:;KG£ /::f~:::::':'/ •• ' v:.;" /2-
-" tP zot,/
-LEF7 SO/ZC)/oC.C::
O/?6.rJ K' /C: ,In ::;nz~/,.r;Cr)-
r-- IrinDNC {)It. A T0/?1C0z)
AI --~/c : ? ~.-t::> r'f::'/ /""'/ t:::. - ~ -o.J>'iI -"l.-' ,
c;/C"Ot/ n;.::>u.J/J 7'6/7::-
IS eTk./ ee:. "-./ -rJl30u /
ISo /'9n.cJ - --ZOQ /~L I
- * [),..,·/I rale. ;:,., ,." ,'f1U fer /
.,4dr ,
GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE I DEPTH HOUR DATE A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample
S - 2" D.O. 1.38" 1.0. tube lample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T - 3" 0.0. thin-walled She Iby tube.
'-,,,,, -~ I(), / of S
LOG OF TEST lORING NO. r'11i!.-t PROJECT~21 Sse //zFhv JOB NO e~&-I/ DATE ,
Gr-? ~ur;:;, 12 _ ,-,). ' ;? /4,-Z)
~i RIG TYPE /...1(:;..// /~ 1 ... _ , ~ 5 :;;;/.:1" / /::j / /c: )20 r;.'/ /I' f t.. II II C >- ,- BORING TYPE
• II ~ II ~ c: .. " ~ .:: 'Co " /4~Q.t::. 1£'); I • II 0-
SURFACE HEV. • .. c • Q. -. " >- • 0_ '0 C u. >- ~o~ . " u 0
" 0 " 'M U '" u USc:2.:::" Tc'PO 0'.; c: 0 f- .. M Q. II • DATUM c Q. , 0 c: ~ ~ i -0" " " " " • • .. II
~ c: ~ • :E Q. Q. ".0 ~ o Q. ·u e '; -.: .. .~ 0.",
~ -.., >- ,,' WI ~ '" Q. C c: " E E 00- '0 e ,- " REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION • o •• ~ 0 " " iD"'o ~.o c-
A'2 0 uc.o: l!).J '" '" -- O.J ::ell. ::>u
V I _ .... -
'5,.~ t t---i---l-----l---f.-----, SAnv / 50"1C ~-----I I :,: I i i~
--.J r' J\1--i---,-~-----t '{ ,. pred. p -;vlt'd jrnd/ I ; ~+~-~:·-1 ==~==--j-/1E 4.J/ rru:/d - :5v .£. 8k 7' ; I '-----,
~ , I ~-/r-~----+-i_--t--- '5/.I·','I7C C',,~...,.,t~> NP-,
Ii rris.:'J'l 6,-,-br, I /~(.U r// ---I , 1~ I I ' I '1---I ._---, t- - I j
10 r,P-1 !-J J! I If'
DZjk r7o lc: VCVr .ft.? SIL77/ I I ~ I I ' I
---j i - r I r--t 51"'1.<1 l;) (H("d .,4 -:Jrn~ -------------j , ~~r--- r I t/ s-l /
I ~- - J ,---J-sp'--I o-/()" 16'-20/ 4'05 1-'501 I I' I L' I --, i~-i ! - I / ) " . t (;" ''- l-I , , 1
(~ !
~ I ! I
~./ ~.//~ .... l'''h\/~ , I aL"~~-:: (C:l:~"~,1;c::. ---1 ! -L
lYIL- ..->I
J
~ 5rcvc~ I
I-~~ '?~ ------ i I ±=1-~- .sc"'~ld I D I I I
I I
~zz; -'I - [' I I T -,-- z,:;/-4oj - I M)' I
! i :c; I l----i I
SP ! I I , v-\ !
i I . ! I i I ! I I
;,:;:-3,;. I WJa' , ! i
-------1 t ; -i----j- I
i i i 'I I
I I I : I I i I I ! I I 11 I I I I I I ~ i i i !
5D i I
\ Ii i I I
~ ! \/i A \ \ I A if' I I
j tel i I I I
35" I I I
~-tiA' '\ , \
X I' '~
clP \1 ;~i( ,-'
40 a . \ - A "
Oi) ~1j) 1\11/1. .X I' t
!Lli a.-. I? V \! I o,V
~I I
I (~
I IM~ I
5? I I GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE I DmH I HO," I om J A - Auger eUllings. B - Bloek sample
S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T - 3" O.D. thin-walled Shelby tube.
_1-js:::11 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
1~1 CONSUlTING OEottCHNICAl ENGINEERS -- t - PHOENIX' TUCSON • AlBUOUERQUE • SANT 1>. FE • SA!' lAKE CITY • El PASO
("\'1/
~ PROJECT r4 Z. S.s c.. ( JOB NO it t"f-/I DATE 1/ z? It?
j
;:, Z:;;F 5' LOG OF TEST lORING NO.I'o/«-1
RIG TYPE ____________ -'-___ _
BORING TYPE ______________ _ .. • LI.. " c •
SURFACE ELEV. ______________ _
".:D
.: .;
C>. • o
5 ~ ~ ~ .. .. c ~ -~ ... ~ c c .. .. . .
UIl.IlI:
- 951----1
DATUM
REMARKS
1--1
9 100 ----l .. ___ ....::.G.:..:.,RO;:..;U:..:.N:..::.D.-:.W:...:...:A~T=..:E R~ ___ --. SAMP L E TYP E
f 0 I--;-Dr7E F' __ T-:-::H:-!-:~~--J-.,...;D;.:.A.;...:T E:;t.:-d )t- A - A ug ere u II i n 9 s. B - B lock sam pie
f-;l_il_O M'-=;:"'C'--1-"---!...._-t-:-I1 :....::Z~r~5.::::.j·,t ' S - 2" O. D. I. 38" 1.0. tube sam pi e. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T - 3" 0.0. thin-walled Sh .. lby tube.
,/ ;-',....~ - "
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
_1-IrMl SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
-I ~I CONSUl TIN(i OEOTECHNiCAl E""",EERS -- t --- PHOENIX' TUCS0t-4· ALBUOUEAOUE' SANTA FE· SAlT LAKE CITY' El PASO
() "-I -,-
~ PROJECT ,-;-/2', JOB NO 6 'E:P-II DATE
$"SC I/Z7/eS
.~ . ~ .... c: >-II ~
~ o • -
LOG OF TEST lORING NO.H .. (?-)
., . RIG TYPE
"r."", ,,- BORING TYPE .. .. c: .. ~ .. ~ cQ .. 0- 0 ... -: " .t' ~ 0_
'0 C SURFACE ELEV. U 0 " II.
!) .2 u .E o ~ c:
:> " " .; c: ~ ~
''; ... ~ ... c: c: .. .. 0 .. .. Q ua.Q::
I 4.;20 ----~
4~ --~ I
( 1---1 1.30 1---
1
~ --, , /3S-1---I
-,.,:;-;",\ ?/~V'
,14-0
0
14:::..
-
/50
"0 u
:E ..... E 0
t!)..J
>- ~o..<: I- 11M ... "
U II ~ V> 1,1 DATUM .... 0 c: " ~ c: l~ .. II .. II :> ..
Q. Q. ".c ~ Q ... ~ -." .:: .., .~c.: >- ,; E E 00- .- "
" " -~- • .c o II c- REMARKS ~-~ Q..J ~a. ::>u V> V>
I ! f
I iii I i ~l=l---~i----~I'----l;----'
I I i I i! i ,
I I I I I i i ! 1
! I I I
,
I
H-i
t I
I I
I I !
I I I I I
I I I i !
t--+--+--+-----!--I ~II ."" I I : ""
\ \ \
\ , \
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
__ ------~c::::o;.~~.~~~. 54r1u/ jJ~. medJ,rr1~~V 50rne A $'s • ..,o; SOW'lC I ~-4-X::: ~~ucf- ~S"" ~'(h.m /
'5 (,( ft~ _ Su I:Wrl d' l tJ ~ br.
i'1P./{; l£ces. beds of2 Pd' <"'" I.!- c ~ d f'M sC:>,..., . 1f .;.' • '7 -':"" /
es? ~~~1 13E{- 1401
GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE -
I DE F'TH HOUR DATE A - Auger eutting.. B - Bloek sample
S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T - 3" 0.0. thin.walled Shelby tube.
_1-1~1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
-1~1 CONSULTING OEOT'ECHN~ ENGINEERS - f - PHOENIX' TVCSON • A.LBUOUEROUE • S.AHT A FE • SALT lAKE CO'Y • El P"-SO
• • IL.
.~
of '" • o
150
/:;;-;;-
-~. -~ ':-'
- 1&0
~, I .... ;:i
l(p -' , !::I
. ~ -; - 170
[13 ~/7-:i
~~./
~
1(;'0
1£5
190
'95
'co -
• =-=-
.. c • " 0 u D o ': c:
" 0 0 u c ~ ~ :c '." .!! "' ... C c: .. 0 • C> ~ 0 un-a: ~.J
i -----1 --'-1 ------1
---j I 1
j I
-~ - I ,
I ------t ____ J
---j ----I ,
1 , j
i ___ I
I I -----. I ------1
I 1 I I
-~
I I --I !,
i ! I
I
i - I
I i
~
I
:;5 C . 1/-cCfIZ9
~:i . ~ -• • c ).. ~ . ~ . ~ c o ~ .:: ~o 0 • 0-
CL -. " ).. . 0_ '0 C ).. ... o.J: .; a u 0
I- OM CL C> ~ IJ? " c ~ .,,~ • • '" • 0 0 C> ~ i C'M Q. Q. .. ..0 ~ 0'" ~u ~ -." )...,; .~ ... ~ M
E E 00= .- 0 0 " -"'0 ~..o o 0 c-
II) II) 10 __
O.J ~D.. ;:,u
i ! I 1 I i ;-----+----r------~---T----
,: ! I : t--ri----t----r-i---- -- 1--=1----~----! i ~ !
~=t;-r .I-l-----i I I I I i 01 1- I 1----- --1---+ ! : -
! i: I --l i ~-.. --------'----- ----1---i I; I I ; - I i I -i I ~I--I =----,---1-----rt- --1--1--FT1--1 I--=F----I'"--r---l--t--. ----
I I i I l f--1 ==r----I ------, ! -t . t---.~\ i ! I -1---.-1 I
I I
H-t I ! I
i I ! J
I I 1 I ,
I ! I I I 1
I I !
r I
I I j f I /
I I I I I t
! / I I I
I ! I I I I 1 I ! I I
I
l I I i I I i 1
I I I ! j I I I
I I
I I :
, -. - 1
! I . j I I
I i I I I
I ! I I
RIG TYPE
BORING TYPE
,4'4c~':3
LOG OF TEST lORING NO. /-11('-/
SURFACE ELEV •
DATUM
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSI FICATION
FAn 6 '-0 ",-" L R ~JTt;'1
Grpn. /,·c c/r--',..+; - ,,-
~7. C;.~ -I d. / ",.. ht"' .. ·d
,
GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE DEF'TH HOUR A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample
S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. t"b" sample. T - 3" O.D. thin·walled Shelby t"be.
_1-jS~1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
1~1 CONSUlTiNG GEOTECHNICAL EtlGlNEERS --- 1 - PHOENIX' TUC~· ALeUOUEAOUE' SAHTA FE· SALT lAKE efTY· EL PASO
\} \l,. -~
'"
(~Od)
I A1ISN3a
~ - CI) V>z 3B01SIOV/ zo w_ 1N30ij3d Q>-
~ ~~ ~ ~, \
~ f\l I..~
'"", w .... "'::> ::><.l >- .... ('SV/!l) 5~ 1H~13M ::E AHa
('slim) lH~13M
13M
\I') \U ~, c.. ~ \Il
0 -:0 « 0 z \I') .0 .!:l
0
Z ro -. f-
0
to: w i= 0
t= « ~ t= \I') w > Z
All118V3WH3d
Z 0 !l313WO!!OAH
;:: « NOIlVN~IS30
311HOO 0 NOISNVdX3
z :l :::?
3~BVHOHns @ INOISNVdX3
0 0 l.I.. ~ S30!!0.:l
to: 1VWNON "'" ~ w :r
011S NI HO en
....I
::> \j n l'1
... 31VlI01VS <.l ..., '" SlNIOd C
.:10 !l38WnN
~ \f\ :> .~
~
NOI1VN!lIS30 I z 3A!!nO 0 ;::
"'" c @ 31V!!OlVS ::i 0
'" z OV01 0
<> wnwlxvw
b w AlISN30 -. 0 0:: lN31NOO 0.. 3!10l510W
X30NI I hd) AlIOI!SV1d
SISA1VNV hiS) 311315 . 31dWVS .:10 3dAl ~ '"",,\ ~ S ""
~--"- , " '\, "-....
\1) I.f) Q \'} 0 ~ f\) Q " t'-J w I \ e .... I z c.. : j I ::E <:J ... c "'" \t') ~ l'" {J 4') z z '" ~ ;;: "'" :r \J ~ 0 .... '" "" ~ UJ
Q
I
~ , '" e "'" z ....
I I 1
I
. , .. I~ ~ ~, .~ ~ 'l ';;;;r -" " ,
\., , , " {J ~~ ~,
, , Q \tl () '{} .J f ~ 1\1 ~~ , ' i , I
, I • \ I lJ ~
\" i
irl ,\J ~~ ~ ~ ..;oj \") ~) .. 1'
;.., '~
J ~, 'I. -, '"
,
I ....... . -~ ~ "l "'J'
\ , \. '\,
\J n l) Cl \J K \' !\ .. \),:. v~
,-\ f , ~ \0 \
;~ ",t'0 ,...,
~ ~ ~\ •.. i \ ", I;,}~\
I ,
1-~ ~
'. '.
~ ~l ~ \ I n ~ \..~
I I
I
,
',J
\ (\ (i } \"\ 'I.
(~
-a
o '<:t
o Z Q)
-0 o U
*
(J
rC' c C"
!:! C ~t:a -,
ir~ 4
.' L~
./1? sse PROJECT~~~~' ___ -______ -=~~~~ ________ -JOB NO. e ~;;'-"'I/ DATE / /' 7¥7~
/- 50, LOG Of TEST lORING NO. rfi!P',
.. " "
co " u. ~~ y
.: co ::> D D
-= co ~ ..
'.: ... ~ ... co co " " 0 " • 0 un-It:
':0:)
1': .,..,t o
'
--;".!~';.---
···~I----
____ i
I ____ I
---I
j 1--
1 I
1--1 I I
-;; Y
:E ..... ~ 0
Cl...J
>-. .. ::> " u c ~
" " o ... t;
O...J
c o
RIG TYPE __________________________________________ __
BORING TYPE ____________________________________ _ SURFACE ELEV. __________________________________ _
DATUM
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
~----; '-'-
___ --_--_--_-_-_-_--i_-_-_-_---_-_-'~' _-_--_-_-'_' --------4--.-'-~~-/-"~.
, > 1 i ' 1 '_~_ ....... __ ~_----~ _________ ~ •• ~ _______ _0 ______ • __ _
---" _. ---~-------,~, .. ------. ~---.--- --,---------- -------\-.-.----~-~--- -~-~------j-----------..- .< ------
t
----------! i ~--T---~·----------
~ .. -- -....:---.:.---.......;-~-----------~--------, ----,-+---------_!------ ----. j----~ .--~ .. -_. _----0 __
I I '
~.,-------~-----~- ----------~
---~--_7------~ .. -------:
----'------'----. '---:----
:_.J_, ___ ~ _____ , __________ I L-L_i ____ , ____ : ___ ~ ____ _ t l ________________ ~-----,----
L--l--~-----'---~--------I
I' I L..i.. ' I i .~--41-----+i----~-------
t I I ----~------r--____r------~----~
I I I
I 1 j ! I I I ;! I' f.-.-.i--l ----~----'.----_i_---i ' : I
IZE.FU5£D o..,v 13 c:. De oei::. (9 w~ ; h?o!SA If: L6-: t.<V;! i 6;...1 ~::..
"-"·'''3t..6' e:.t~,:~ \..r", /50~ZCO ("';-, .:> - ~ t ~ "c ,.-. .....,. )' ~vt::;'1C~ Cr.;;... .;.. I.-,-,~ '" •
GROUND WATER
D'P," I "0"" I SAMPLE TYPE
A - Ayger cyttings. B - Block sample S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tybe sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tybe sample. T - 3" 0.0. thin-walled Shelby tube.
DATE
r r •
PROJECT ,4li'lzon,4 S"S"'C JOB NO €li'3.-// DATE II ze/6s:::'1 .....
LOG Of TEST lORING NO/?J£-2
G!"PI? ()rJ e aN I/&: I ;< /:J ~ 4oc. RIG TYPE -I ~
~; -S~# rfl"e ;eor~~y
* .. .. c )..
C BORING TYP E ... ~ . . - I .. go:: .:: cO 1355 I~ I' • • ).. . 0_ - .~ SURFACE ELEV • • " c • ... .... 0 .; e U 0 j'8 u. ).. ·o...c UStPs 7o/?O " " u D l- eM Cl- . ~ DATUM .~
0-'; e u Cl- • 0 c ~ ~ i -0;
" 0 " • • .. .. • 'M c - .. :.c "..0 ~ of .: . .~ D. D. . -.., o Cl- ~U .:= M "'co t-i " ... c c " E E ..2~~ .• - .. " REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION • " . . ~ 0 " " " II c-O UlLQ:: (.!)...1 ." VI CI)~_ 0...1 :tlL ::>u
D' S/~ 7/ S/lN~ jJ/'ed .
. -- - r-'
A -
--- II V, S/ v. p. -j:,. ~·rrJd/ ver, ~ -10 S:A.v,DY 5"//'" -;; JM d-5 ~1~/s/
I ft!, s-l. /'''7 t!:: ern .;.;,J)#?
~ If.. IA I--- ~,tY) l ~ ~I ~ ,~ \ Sw CJnt~~~:::'.'?
~ ,
/0 ~') I' i
-I~ ~vl ? ~ /~ /6r,/ \ V II
j/8 r . 10 1-1 rhh -.i.~ f- A l- II-'
\ , --'
/s ~ I '3 til \\ \/ /)~.j~ / ClccPlS'. tJrsl't!!'/ '..J
r!J f- fYJl ---
$/2 ee/ c~::;"/~ -:;:<,1 b6JC' -. ZO
* .s~.6~,.,..,~ VG" .FC~i:f.$
~J?, , .;. "./,;.!pM
It t¥ r;1~' , rC~ ~~. /lr'-: If'
, . ... 'U I'-
Z5 ,~ \
/Ilk,' 8c~~ .. § /Y17 ~ ~ ~I 51"?J .\ I \ /: Vt3/ ;:O~ e~ \
30 "- } .,(,.,a ~ ~ \; ... :~ C /:1 C .:;:; I
/ec"; /rrCl' LeY'! ~c~ "1 .II. ):.1
" . \
'-J <,,- i
/'ip/c: -l-.:;.
\ RCJ6a~/~ V -/\ I~f- Recen;i ~$"I...,_-/,,# If , :1ed~"7~S" .
, J /1)'-40 _. , ).i . ./
,'-..1'" l \ f- ....
~" ' \
.\ c
4~ ,.
" \ ( 1f [J,..,. II rc;, Ie. ~ ~ ~! ;-IL-
;:., "." ,'r'1u -IeS' / .'\1' 1\ I
.0:: / j fOd~
'J J j
5c GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE I DEPTH HOUR DATE A - Auger eUllings. B - Bloek sample 5 - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample.
_1l!H;l1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
1 '" B I COI'SUl Tffll OEonC'*'1C-'I. [NONEE""
T - 3" 0.0. thin-walled Shelby tube. - t -- PHOENIX' TUCSClf>4 • AUtUOU'EAOU£. • s.tJ.lTA rE • S-A.l T l.AX£ CfTY • £1 P...sQ
",2' o/=-" I' •
PROJECT JOB NO. GlfS- / I DATE I /29 /,?y
G/rt?Orle/J- LJl:N 1/6;2 /4-i RIG TYPE
~ .. q i ~ BORING TYPE -6~'" rtlte ,..eOr~rty c .. 8': .. 'eo 0 1355r:S'" I • SURFACE ELEV. • .. -. I>
... . 0_
~8 u. • I: • ... t.O.J: .; e U 0
US~S 7c:>Pc> ::> 0 u o ':: ~ "i .... tiM .. tI .. DATUM .!: ... 0 c .. ~ i ""O~ ::> I> I> U • • tI •
of c .... :E Q. Q.
.. Jl .. 0" .. U • 'M : •. !! .... ) _ "0
ti .. ~ M .. C C .. E E ~~:; '0 • .- 0 REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATIO~ • o • • e 0 I> I> c-
o Ulloa: t!I-I VI V\
10 __ 0-1 ~n. ::>u
LOG O' TEST lORING NO. frJ/f-:2
C>D
50 [\ ,-,-'\I V} A S/~'T7 S/'-Jn,0 t/~,...:
.\ Li! if /
t K-. /1 /YJ-'-- .,0 -- '} /.7 ~/'- T~ ~ /' I"/,~L , V· Sl-65
"" C:C:;' r;J ,"/ '~/ ) • \f".... V If r11tJl:5 -r r\ /, I" 'J II
/J~/C/ 60 CO,l?7n'~~ "? I .;.--
'* C'~/""A'G i/C ,,' -'? /c ~.s
)-1 SrJ? e:* c: ~ r.) ,~.rC ~ ';; ".:; . .... '-' \ I/~,
6S-,:'-' I~
It \ I
-.L . f ,
7D ~ ,
-y -; \ j
{J
" 111
tl n 7-:5
. t ~""A
\\ ll\ I ,rl,-"'-J \! A
IA ./' 2'0 '- 1
i
\/ l A'
t .1
8:) ~ J
\i /J . A r
l
.:570..4~ L)£ILU,16-@ \ i ; /co l
90 ~
J ;
\/ bo/2£#"U;- cAI-'G/.J /0 J A h- 99/
I I
I
LeFT OPer:J FO/2, -:.-:)' t I, r'llr .. It!! ! , /n~r~&;N?1 e;.r? ,/",1 r:, c,,/ I V J
: /\ r 1 ;,., ... -Ies-/ CG ~~/orJc. .s ) ,~ ! II ~,,-r \'I /
~-, ,
- GROUND WA 1 E.K SAMPLE TYPE _1-DEPTH HOUR DATE A - Auger eullings. B - Bloek sample 1l8J1 SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH !VOM£" I/Z5/8£b 5 - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample.
-, r: B I C>Of<SUl T .. a OEOT'ECHNCAl E"""'EERS U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T- " thin-walled Shelb tube. - t - PttOENIX' meSON· N..8UOU£AOU£. SANTA. F'E· SALT LME em· n "Me 3 0.0. y
:) 'v w'
~ PROJECThZSS c.. JOB NO 62f-/I DATE 1/ e:.8 IBB
LOG Of TEST lORING NO • ..A1R-2
RIG TYPE GHRD,A.) E.J2 - DcA/V6/Z 1400 BORINGTYPE 5~" /ilf? /?OT~I
'" ~; ,
~ ~ i ~ p" .. ~ .. ~ .i. •
JH • g.:: cO
u. ... -: 0 >- • 0_
C; ... ~O...c .; B U 0
. !: f- ......... .. ~
u .... 0 c ~
...c :E • • .. ~ ~ i Q. Q.
.. ..D ~ 0 ... A. ... ", E E
~-." >-"
,;U
• ~ 0 00- '0 •
0 (!>...J " " - .... - ~..D II) II) ctl_..E O...J ~o..
I) \ ~. I
V \1 4S l 1
!l!\ I
~
, 1 ,
t: 0
'0 '0 II) u ""t''';: .,' .. ~ ., .- " c-=>U
SURFACE ELEV. ,1 ==?~O 1350:r: 0- I DATUM U:5@$' TOpO
REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
4 1& " FlZJ::)n B/1sc 0 rK 6Lt... t TeJ (b/ZoU 1'1 /::> 24/ j::.6u..y l;?AI2. 46-,,; .:.. -Sr;. -
(bo I rf'.oM :$W,rc~!.."1/L)1 201 PIPCS ~S 1'8''£~
IV r' ! -1 1/\1 I ! II I
I r '\ I I COr-===~~~~~~--~--~~~----------~------------------~ GROUND WATER SAMPLE TYPE _1-DEPTH HOUR A - Auger cuttings. B - Block sample
5 - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. tube sample. U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. tube sample. T - 3" 0.0. thin,walled Shelby tube.
'[g)'" I SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH -, '" B I CONSUl TlNO OEO"I'ECHNJCAl ENGINEERS
-- t - PHOENI)( • TUCSOt-I • ALSUOUEAOUE: • SANTA. FE • SALT lAKE CITY • El PASO
f.j:> PROJECT . /-J C, JOB NO ,c. f;?-II .:.c:
sse DATE 1/2fJ:>,/B,g ~ .. - ':..
G/-::/I{/,;)/)t:.IZ - l)c../1 /CR Id-:""ieJ
LOG OF TEST lORING NO.~e--:.
~i RIG TYPE , ~
~ 5" 3/4- ",.. /::}I/4. /(' 0 'T /1#'-t ~ ~ c ,., BORING TYPE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c
'; o .. 'Co - 0- - - .~ J
- .. r: _ 0- -. D
,., . 0_ '00 SURFACE ELEV.
LI.. ,., ... o~ ~ ~ u 0
g ~ ~ Ii I- " M 0-'; U " ~ V) u
DATUM .!: " D D u Q. • 0 C ~ ~ i ~~ r: .. ~ :c • - ".D ~ " " e 'Wi
-E ~ ... !! Q. Q. o Q. .~~ Q. .. ~ _"0 ,.," ~ ."
0- r: r: .. E E ~~~ '- D • o •• ~ 0 D 0 ~.D o ~ c- REMARKS VISUAL CLASSIFICATION 0 UQ..IX c",..J V) V)
10 __ o..J ~Q.. ;:)u
.so ~~ -~ , ___ ! _l_--~-__ + _____ ~n(J,/Sx..T ) , - - , I , ---\00 4 I --r4 '---I ---.--I----j .------ --
OPt 1"0 ~ .r!'. ~ i! til -~ .., ; --c---t----t---~----i-----.--
S5" -t;OJ ~-'I--l----- -------1"---
V· >t· _~ ~!' [ I I , I ~.--+-------l---t-yt1 t; l10J~r • I I i I i - I ,i/4T--r- i ._---~ 1-- --1-~_ .---~"
: 4 ~;30 I\-. -i I _. ~.; i ; ----t -- 60
i ~I ' I . ·:s , ._- !.~ .~--! I : I --~ I -T~E-t--l--~I-'-
i . -t--,---t I' I~-,
)
! -! -1 I I -.-(05
. , 1 I
5!rlltJ5. .-:. I . r I -- I I !
~~ ~-------t
J-A-i--l I I (' ,
tOCJz~1f LJ . 1-1-Pft::--I ~ I 70
-() r-l -l---r---
--~ ~--i-f ! I i
. I !
----1 I
I
, 41 ! , ':'1 ! !
-~ 1\.1 i 1----I I I
75 l,i I I ! I
i I ! I I I i
~ - I I '11 : 1 I
l-+Ai 1 I
I ! I , I ~ I I ! I
i
'D !
I .TI I I J
~o ,
i
~! I I I
'PO - I - I I I I I , I '/Ji I I ! I j : i I ! I ,
I I . i i ! I 8$ -"-t/l11.i5 ' ; I
I . ~
, i-l-
1.4-\..:. ... I
~ ().Tl~ I I
90 I 5ioi>PW ()t2 l ltln6-
,tit II'! (, • I r', 1/\ G I()O ~ V rn
8t)~e.1J,f.£' ;1'\ {.ifr()~J
9:;- \, 'Fo1Z /1-1 ST /U/,rl'J~ Tr/T, C¥-./ ~X
,
I!f) I I " (6CO ,af/OrJes. ) IA In! !
. I Y I ~4/1cO ro 99/
Dc) I 'IV ! I I GROUND WATER
, -
DEPTH SAMPLE TYPE
A - Aug .. r eullings. B - Block sampl .. S - 2" 0.0. 1.38" 1.0. lub .. sompl ... U - 3" 0.0. 2.42" 1.0. lube sample. T - 3" D.D. thin-walled Shelby tube.
_1-Irs:?ll SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
-1~1 CONSUlTING OEO"''''''''''''- ENGINEERS - t -- PMOENIX, TUCSON' ALBUOVEAOUf· SANTA FE· SAlT lJJ(f erN· El PASO
VIUJI:K t-UK SOil & FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION SAMPLES wo # ____ _ .-.,<--::>-.11 "-'<:'j
...... _nc'" "unl\ A~~luNtD By ________________ _
DATE WORK ASSIGNED' ____________ _ (SOil) PROJECT f1 C( (;C ;:;::>p,., s;s C S;/ "..
Tab. Date ..- .. ' "';"I"';'\) ..::s c:;
TARGET DATE FOR COMPLETlON, _________ _ I
Job No. 12?l9-1(
MOl STURE·DENSITY a:: CONSOLIDATION DIRECT SHEAR CALCULATIONS .., ~ ~ I ~ ~ .., ~ i
BORING NO. ::;; ~ @J Z '- ~ Z "" _ OTHER
~ ~ LLJ :;: W ~ ~ UJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~~ lAB AND .... ~ - '" I- >-::. I- ..: "" I- -.... - <.> -..: ::;; ..: I- I- Z::. i:: o en 0 ::J Z ~ c:( Z L&J en < (I) « (J) en c:: en Z 0 L&J x....... x- LLJI- _
NO. DEPTH SAMPLED .., ..,> ~ f;; ~ t; ~ ;;; ~ 0 g; ~ ~ !g ~ g; ~ ;§ ~ ~ ~ ~;g~ ""0 ::;; I-~!i >-~!i ~"'o- ~~ I 0.. « ~ - z z c:( c:( I- c:: cn .c::: -..... ..... 0:: a.. a.. ..... cn 0:: LI.n.""..:: o::L&J"'::: UJ UJ-~ ~ ~ ct ~ ~ g ~ :E 9 (;3 g. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @) ~g~ ~ ~ ~~e. c~e. n.~ o~
f~;Jj~lo 6"- z' ~
?'6 ", >' Is B /61", !3'i//j" Ie
/3 '6":'/J'//" (, / ? ' C ," - Z? / {, "s
:.,~?; -;:} 't. " r 1;0 '-'-/0' g,!z" ) r~". r-,-'//I; " I,
:;;;,.,;,,; ,/./ //,; 1/
(,O/'ho'S'" ~ I
b> '-bS'Y/z " ~ h8'Gh"-73'C" ~ n ' 0' -, ,- Ir nO - ~-:>o...... I)
f?r;" ,g~'0~"I\
10' -90''I'lz ,. ~ 15' -9~'2r' Ie
/00' - 100 zrr I~
/0 r;'- /o!:'/I!z '" I~ Jln ' ~ II n' 5, I' IS J 15' - I J S' 1j '1 1\
} 20' - / z,,-/ Zit (' b _ -REV. 10-10·80 TAB
MO 1n171 {,-¥ ~
sPOOl"! s:c-:-./I.-..; ""'A"e _(:f'I_/lr rp-,.-71l/':!,-5-
Code No. 40 _______ _ _f'61 ~~I
SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH CONf,lJtTI"OGFOTED<NICAlfNaINHRS
~~NIK'AlBUOUFl'out '5"-NU f{ '~Al T lAKE ctTY.n PASO
PROJECT ENGINEER hE-W WORK ASSIGNED BY _____________ _ WORK ORDER FOR SOIL & FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION SAMPLES wo # ____ _ DATE WORK ASSIGNED _____________ _
TARGET DATE FOR COMPLETlON _________ _
(VJ (SOIL) PROJECTC> r /c .0 e.e; 50S c S ; --It:<
LAB
NO.
BORING NO.
AND
DEPTH SAMPlED
~ < WI ~ II.. '" :;: -::i "o W
~
'" U ::)z
., II..
,,_,~ /" Ii:: "I~ I'~I ~~ t;~ t;~
~~ :3 0 oiS (/)c( D..~ :Eo
i:: u; Z W 0
CONSOLIDATION DIRECT SHEAR
:;: ::> :;: -~ ~o :;:~
@) W
~ "" ::>
~
Z ~I::; ~ "" w Z
>!::? ""'" ::>w uo
w '" "' ..... :;:Z ::>-z~
w~ tic;; ~z ..... -<"" "'0
;;J.", :;:~
"""" 00 z"-
w CI
''''' z< o:z: -u
"'''' z::> <", II..
~@)
Z Z ~ o ..... - < ~~~ 11..""'" x=>w wuo
"" t; :;: o "" o >:z:
i:: ::;
~ :;:
"" W II..
Tab. Date 2- 8 -:r-A ,Y\I 8!:!' Job No. gB tjr//
OTHER
..... :z:~
t-Clcn
I.LIU:;~ :;:::;::~
MOISTURE-DENSITY CALCULATIONS
w ..... ..... "" z=> :z:~ w ..... CI", u'" >--:;: ffio ~~~ 11..:;:
i:: u;~ z ..... w u o!!:.
f\;~ - /~/~'
~~'S'::5~o~-I!O'Zf,U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~--
/ sS",. )~S'rjJ l/ /yo . -IYo '?~1~
J'!C;; ',. 1t;S'']'/; 1J
I en r rj$r:7' ?" I..) -r ... 1/
Gor;I)(1 MA-lJ --;7
&11-2' ~ Lf "(;"-h' Is /01' -lo'!L'h" .s J> '-/5'6'/ I< 20r r Zo'Lf{l _~
30 ' -3, . b ff I tj
Ito' --Lto'.>·/ jl r'S b"(-'131o " ) 1(70 -VR,5
5>'->S?~ Ii
l bS:' - / 5" Ii
I II REV. 1 10-80 TAB el!: ~ Code No. 40 _______ _ I
-fY.l SERGENT. HAUSKINS & BECKWlTH
-,.., ... Q nJUNUA. ION INVESTIGATION SAMPLES wo # ____ _ Tab. Date :2.- 8 :r: A w £3:? DATE WORK ASSIGNEO, ____________ _ (VJ (SOil)
PROJECTt:< r /c L>e~ .ss c <:' ..:-1<:< TARGET DATE FOR COMPLETlON _________ _ Job No. gB-~-//
MOISTURE·DENSllY ii: CONSOLIDATION DIRECT SHEAR CALCULATIONS '" ~ ~
~ ~ w BORING NO. ~ ~ @l :z (!J :z Q:; ~
.. >- ~..... ::;;, 2: ~ :z ~ '" :::; OTHER '" LAB AND : ~ I- l:! ... :;: ~ !;t ~ ~ !::: ~ ~ ~!;t t;:; a; ... ... !z~ ~
o (I) (.) :::l ;z ~:::;, c( z UJ CI) < CI) ;;J, CI) (I) Q::: (I) Z ~ ~ x- x- wI- _ NO. DEPTH SAMPLED '" ~ ~ ~ ~ t; ~ ;;; ~ c ~ ~ ~ !l1!z ~ ~ :;: ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ :;: ... ~~ >-~~ ~~ ~u::
Q.. c:( c::( C - Z Z c:( c( I- a:: (I) ...::::: - I- a:: a:: a.. CLQ:::(I) C a:: ww..::; a::WoC 0 UJO
~ ;;; ~ i z ~ g ~ :E g ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~:5 ~ ~ i:;S @) ~~~ ?r :f 3:3:~ c3:e. :f:E oe:.
~or ;rJ~ iYA- /2
V. 1O-10-S0 TAB
~r(-z; IS It'hF-G' ~ 9'Gh--;O'5" ~ } S" - !s's '/~ f' 15
2o'-2o'8!i' ~ 2 51' ~2>'? r' 5-/?' (iN - "'7" .7'" ~ Pc" I :7..;>-
33" b"~ ~I ' !I~' 1 .3 8" ~ "-J ~ '5 If' ~
Lf3'G"-Iff/'iz ~ s '1&'(/'-'18'//" >
S1'(,'I'W3" 2 ;;'8' b rr -57' YIy~_ hi'" r;z' '; b )'6 11 _"'l'z" ~ 6$'&': _6C;/~> 73 'b'r -731/1r'~
~o 1017li Code No. 40 _______ _ JS~I
\('~I ~.~
SERGENT. HAUSKINS & BECKWITH CO~IJlTINOQF01rC>< .. ,G~lfNOI .. nM
"'K)HII~ • ~lIIUOIJF~OUc • SANTA 'f .!;"l.lll"f cory· n MSO
(30d) I Al1SN30
~ -'" "'z 3HnlSIOVi zo w_ lN30~3d 0 .... ,c( w .... "'::> ::>"" ........ ('SVi~) 5(3 lHDI3M ::;; AHa
('SW~) lHDI3M
13M
()J ci -:u
D Z ..ri ..n
0
Z It) -, I-
0 '" w :z: b
i= < (!) i= V) w > Z - All118V3WM3d
Z 0 11313l'101l0AH
I-ott NOWtNDIS30
3"llno C NOISNVdX3
Z :l ::J'
3DllVHOHOS @ INOISNVdX3
0 0 1.1.. ~
0(1
\J ....I
0 t cl • t
n i/\
S301l0~
'" Ttll'IllON :5 :z: n!IS NI HO en .... 31VHnlllS (,) ... '" SlNIOd Ei
~O l!38l'1nN
~ ')
\: \" , ~ J 1
NOllVNlJIS3Q 5 3hllno ;: c( 0 @ 31VlIOiVS :; 0
'" z OVOl 0 ..,
wnWIXVVi
U UJ AlISN30 -, 0 0:: lN3iNOO Q.. 3llniSIOW
X30NI (1&) AlIOI1SV1&
SISA1VNV
I (VS) 3"31S ..J. 31dViVS .:10 3dIJ. ~ "- ~ ,...,.. ""'\: ~ ''\!'"
~ .. ... \ ,
"-, " " " V1 () {}
~1 0 I'll \P () l\j ~ ('()
'"' " I 0 I I i w I I f
0 ~ \J V) ,'" n .~, z f"': ~ \'1 ~ <!I 0 \\~ I\} z z '" '" I' , ii2 ..; ./
::z:: 0 ... CD c..
'" w 0
I
z 0 ;: ... .... c..
~ ::;; 0
z .., \\{
~
<.!l a: v; 0
'" ... -< w
'" ~ '" 0 0 3: .... ... ~ <.lI
a: !Xl 0 .. z ...,
< ;:: '"
I I I
I
I
l _l i "- ''I '!' ',.\ ,I ~ ''-I.
-. "- \ '\ , Q
, " (J n \;1
~ () ~ ~ 1.1 ~ \"\ ~ '.J ( ! r ! I I
b ,
I
h ~ \1 ~ ~ r< .,,~
\{: Hi
" ,\~ \,1 ~ \-
'd
I J
I
\ , "" ... '\
'" ......... '""-;:.( '<.
, .... , ,
0 ~1 \--) t Lv .' r, G..,. ~ \.'
I \ .~ \,) :0, \) ...
:,~ ,.'- 1 .. , 0- ',.\: \..~J
I
I
I
I
I ,
-~
, ):.1 \'" •
(~
,
_I -" " ("I ,.,. "
" <,J {~-"
o ~
o z ()J
-g U
p . .:3 01- 4·· ___ ~"L~ u, ___________ _ YI/UKK ORDER FOR SOIL & FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION SAMPLES wo# ____ _
(SOil) Tab. Date / /21./~:..'3 DATE WORK ASSIGNED, ____________ _
PROJECT 4? Sse Job No._e.=;;""-,E",,,-~='If:_---,I/,---____ _ 'TARGET DATE FOR COMPlETION _________ _
LAB
NO.
BORING NO.
AND
DEPTH SAMPLED
WI ~ £[ ~ :::;; ~ « en
cn .... o wI w~ 0. >-' >- w« t-- _Z w«
~
;:: I'" gx ~§I ~ en LLI (/))- '"
s~ o~ t5 (L_:Eo 0
CONSOLIDATION DI RECT SHEAR
:::;; ::l :::;; -0 ~« :::;;3
@J
'u !.:t '" :::J
~
z o .... ;:: 0 « 0:
w~ ~~ ~(i; ~~ ::JW :;:)0 <..) 0 2:0...
~E «en O:z
~; cno
<1'" :::;;~ "'''' 00 z"-
w C>
"'" z« oX -u en", Z:;:, «cn Il.. (;'j@J
z z ~ o >-- « ~wz q;:>~ 0."'''' x::lW W,->O
0: .... t--
'" :::;; o
'" o >:x:
;:: :; a; « UJ ::;:
'" W 0.
OTHER
l-x-1- Cl u; ww::!: 3:3:~
MOISTURE·DENSITY CALCULATIONS
W
t-- 1-'" z::> x- wI-C>th OW
>--::;: "'-~~~ w O 0..::;:
>-.... <ii-z'<-W U 0<:0
/1/£-Z / Cl? -/05 / 14
PH. 10-10-80 TAB
/oa'-/Io'
//5 -1';::0/
/r:?O-/c5-"
/25-/36 ;'
/3-D-/3S/ [,..11
/~~5-/4otl' wI /40 --/4::>" ~ /4s-/so/1A)
--+ J.---
/50 -/55'" r-L-. ~-----I----t---t - f~~Irj-~T-r-r4-+-+-+~-----------/55-/60"'W-
/ko-/~~/ :--+--~--+---
1~6-/70 / 14-/7(> -/7f:S / j..(~-
/ 7S-I'i?o'/ w ~ )/
I(~D - / Y :5 <I 1 I ~_-.--Je--
I g? - /0/ CJ /' j~t-I --t--t------I--+---I-----I---1
190 _. / rtt) / ,-i-t-t--+-t--+--------- ---+----1----~---
Code No. 40 _______ _ I
~·If) 10'l'7P ~I SERGENT, HAUSKIN~ L "<"'~""T"
_,,,C HV"" A~S'GNED _______________ _
TARGET DATE fOR COMPLETlON, _________ _
LAB
NO.
BORING NO.
AND
DEPTH SAMPlED
"'I ~ -' < D.. U> :lO -
"" en
o w>-"-I ;;; !:e ~;t ?: ;;; ~
dJ;<-·Z 200-(:05~l; ;:0'::;-- 2LJt., /' 14
t11~l -- /.5 ~ 1'- 2 I ~
SI_(,4/~11 1.: 10 1 -//" ~
~
?: (3 i=x <nw :)0 D..~
PROJECT
W ",I::>z >- w U> .... -z 00 :lOt>
?: ;;; z w o
--' .. "''''' -'Vii. & fOUNDATION
/? ~ (SOIL) 2.$C CONSOliDATION DIRECT SHEAR
:lO ;:> :lO -0 ~< :lOg
@) w ~ '" ~
z o "i= 0
< "" ~~ ~~ o::;u; :;=:: ::>w ~o Q 0 Z 0..
~E <V> O::z 1=-.. 0: "'0
<i!<n :lO~ a:", 00 Zu.
w <:>
'- '" z< 0:1: -0 en", 2:;:> ;;:en ~@)
:z :z !::! o I-- < ~wz <>~ D.."'''' x::>w woo
"" w t;:; :lO o '" o >:I:
I~ 4 (..'~;;- <'/INVESTIGATION SAMPLE~_ W~
Tab. Date ~.::>O 8:
?: ~ !Xl < w :lO
'" w "-
Job No. c=:PE-/ I
OTHER
.... :I:~
.... "'V> ww~ 3:3:~
MOISTURE·OENSITY CALCULATIONS
w .... .... '" 2:::> :1:- WI-<!Jen 0'" >--:lO "'-~~~ ..,0
D..:::<
>-.... ;;;~ zu. ..,0 o~
1 1/6'-/6'::5{" ~ I-~ 201-21/671/ _-: l 1---
[~L-JL--l-~--+--+--~--~-+--t--+--i---r-----------------~I----r---li--~I ... t' / f· 'l:? I G () , 2.:J (I> -c'" e:..":') 'I =t---I
J "" .. 3;:n~l~ ~3 /o~
~ B I ~ If - 4 3' & ~ I/::r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B 8 '~ (' -- 2, 5 18 " _ 4g'fJ"I- 4<;-'11'1 j;
.- I ~~:~~:::: W I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
PEV, 10-10-80 TAB
-N'-70,/LI' 1--,: 2:. r~
75 f .... 78 I '2/.1 ('
~
~,n ''In...,ryn
---r----4-----~-----
, (;A SERGENT, HAUSKINS & BECKWITH
Code No. 40 _________ _
APPENDIX B: FIELD SLOPE TEST FAILURE LOADS AND GEOMETRIES
{,.--.
r;6.f rI /D Stt.V)\.~ Ie.
;a(/~y- /o~-::: 1200 :#
A 'p,PYD ~ 1}Yt ",_fc.-J h;u/ ...... -<-
----- --
Yr ~'V __ (_ tS_cJl·_)_+_h<_-~_;_/"'_""~_I()_.,.J V
Vr"" G eZ'- )(16 0 ~Gt) -t
I e2-'L
c= 2001 ?S-+-
I
/
Ct:. leu 1a.lkoY7S 0 eu=2.-' h ~ 2·2
.1 I
b '-:: 1t:J/t2' =-(1, e l
I==- 32 c
I"ol'-'l.-W"<"
-I b' .A-;:: 90 - -ra..14 ( ;: )
-<.. "= ttf () - ~V1 ('2~l) ::: h" 11>
v~ -1 ( h )( £. ) ( %)
V ~ 1 (2.2)(.fr~)(J,3~),= (j,&Z2 ",3
//2-"12 ?C.j2-
Do:. 2.,,0
[' ,'f _1'1( / / . .!r ~-"' '/ i )-2> -----. . ---
I,S l6 L. S -J I D'-t 0 "-
2.S \ISO -:s 'LIDO
4 2~60
6 ~?60
f.o Lllt:>O
7 4£100
S S"l.e>O
9 ~'-{oo
/0 loeO
II I~OO
/2 0';:.00
13 ., 1-DO
/D
(7
/7 Ib 19 lo Z2-v; z7 2-B ]>'[ 13 1S 38
-;'0 ~g
"7~B -:)9 40
YO yS 5S
.. .. ... s
I
sse /foJ4-vI-----+--
5aiM_p_I-e __ 10UJ--__ t~ __ 2_1_1_~_I_~ e _________ _ ~_n, __ _
?IaVl I/("~ 1/1 == 6 I
3
;.z ir.euch LOCAI-~
TSs } el£
S~c... II
--'.
Cc..D
I
10
s' II
___ -+-_~_s_C-__ ;;,_v_t!.-_·J-_ _____1_ 2-._1_1_2-/_" _8 ___ . _l~~f L
-:---I I
6, fa '7 '1'- at ~ 7 ';:: o. '-\ '--\ Cj t <...
1.25 X /. c)
'0. I-v' ClC c,..~c::..
/ /0 h,., c..u(1f/102~o"7
,M4ck. I s,nrpI..#-/. ,e /0 c '# A I'3CjQ
3C1 Tot-1 u~ -Ii tf02.'3, to
0~~ I?~Ob
~!J k'PH~ r:-:"
f~ , ..
W{M /A) '70 _Sc..?-"'p{p :d W~ WvJ
Cr7t / 733J "1 t I,. S 3,o2f
Ci#::? ~2t;. -2- 7.0 {.J 3. ~ '3
Cr~::, C,"2.) t:, tf3. 2- '2- ,'1 ~
Crft 9- BT7.r- 8-g8-~ A,tOS
crtt <;; f!i?'7, @ &4.3 2''?,~
('r#~ 41',-~r 410;./ 3.Co ?
c.r1i 7 7'7"'1· '1 7+5,> 4.9$
C'I.ti9 431-7' 4/S. > 5· I~
crtt-(O 1't7.8. '7/~,'1 -'1.3\
C(# /I f!,/'j.> 7S~·1 ~,ll
cr I:L I / / e g 11'1:.4-·0 4,5'0
C.5 H '2.. / / 7z. /1 ?3./ 3, '13
(J, S
oJ)
L-)
L.,...J UAJ,n /. r ..fo'3 t,o /~.
J.~~y,4
'/.0 r. 5 {y-,O
;;.{ ? (J
? 3 rcJ 1.5 1. 0
&S 10
I ().O
~ 11.0
J 1. . ()
LutrAd ( #-) 1t:>2~
/()4~
2-IOD
2 go-D
~ I ~ 0
350 0
~'1 () 0
.:::j'200
4<;:,5,0
4"'l<!>o
5'060
5~c>C:>
5.qSa
(Q L{DO
,ODD
1'1>00
~Soo
ec:u.cl, A {(t3..A:: 1,2S It Z
10"1 ~t'; pav~ II~ I~ st., r~ ~e._
/0 ..4J 1/1 J Ot .J.L
dlsp 1~("'f!I"I<!~'" I-/0.0
1P',tJ
Jf.o 'I S·o Y1' () S (), 1/ b o. ()
r!JS.o
10,0
go. 0 qt). 0
1.5. 0
f {)O, (;
IDf· O
f/S .0
170 . 0
zo tJ. 0
j)z/z sL~f 701 #L .i3err> G~
~.~ DI J (/ ~/.e /,2-;; XI'.O :- f. -z":> ~fz... ':,:': '.,>,'
Laui . ~4.v#-ll.J s~~ ~t~
WI 10 f-tJVI ~£-k
L/
L.:::>zd VNIf.!;; j) 15?/~c,lrrro (. rn! (? Ot7Y) n-n e rr> /.5
1.. l~oO /8.0 ).,) ns o JZ.o
3· tJ '2.100 ')1. 0
? S 2'-1$0 70 , () if 0 z~oo )5. f) 'If 31so 'f (, () SU 3so 0 S' 0. tJ 'IylO V I IY'\ 7 5·( 3lfoo (po, 0
0 U 4"L6D "1 eJ.I)
t-f 4sso jo, tP
lcJ 4'100 J(}S,() ~zA5 j-'/Y>' I-----'j
:;1 $~CO 1)0. " 9JJ Sc..o 0 I 3J~ 0
,. .. cgS S<tSo i'fo. c? "
''':', 7,0 c.¥c>O I~t. Je'
7':) t700 / 'f8, 0
(0. t? 7000 1St), ~
10CO tp
/I.~ 7~oo I6JV.6
1 (.;31/1/ '" Jl.-....6.
(f;, 79Dc:J ~ C- ~t).'1z.'+ fA- ~ ,4~~ _::: l'tbpS I. Z c;-
r== :=:1
/)Zll c5~~f
."'~ V, ::;"
WI
L/ .
L--Ind I/Nfrj /~1F-
.2.0 /400 ,l-J /,50
/t5 f -I ,3
flr}le- No, j ~
15.0
/ T.o·
.::; I(
L (,~<::. /
1040
IISo
2-IDO
Zlf50
LSoo
3150
350D 3'100
"'tt.e> 0
41-00
T?S1 If if
P &,fo M(!J" Z
Dis! /l3ce --m ~ rl) f 30 ,0
gS,(9 ..J.?- ~ ~-z,o
<;1. 6 ss.o ~Lf·t!>
75- t7
gs,o ?rf.o ~
4-2.-0 0 --(."i ~-::
4waIF-
5t--I
I {lr.,2t-<;~~
: iu-.-- e...
33 ~o 1'$7 {L
;"/ .'.
V, t P
W- I. ()
L, I·l.)""
/.nd [/tVlr5
d. S-/'0
I'S ),0 }.5
1,'S-S.O SjOQ
/)-,,5 3'100
&.0 42-00 K
0·S 45':)0
~~ :
,'. '
7l s j i 5--- !3 i~c-L J
?l:~,fe ;1/,.. 2.. 41'~;: /.2 S- J2f 'Z..
j), 1 /~JC.~'Ynf- 'n/ 1S',o
;22.. CJ J5./ , 1)
30' b 53,0 ')1,0 '1,+, b
Si;J,O C:?S,o 10. 0
AJo.o
42.00
1.2~
1
'~/~ &k~,1
j), 1 " til {),{.1
/-1 6,(''1
/-.-a-zd /J;tI115
/.~ (DZ>
;Z.O /6<-10
.3.0 'L-l 6 D
g:( 2 l .( ")0
J.e? ~SOD
vi. 6~ s'70~
, . ~.o 47-00
:t- i> ate:, oD
'} I S~ .5 ~ C) (C)
,8,0 S(A C> U
1 0 . 0 7()OO
/1 7'3O C
/2 flsou
13 CJ20u
13/L 1'50Q
IS--- /0500
/7- 1/700
/...::=J / 1'1 0 0
If> /2 I/? 610
.:'.
())>!/£~7
ILl, CJ
3~'o
tj/J. t7
'. :>-'0.'>
&0. 0
?"tf ~J'
1S'·0 !1{.~ 0
Cf-9 ·61 )
/00. CJ
11-1. 0
tJ. ~~ -~
I, ([)
;. ":J~
')..0
j,I"
3. 0
l·5 Cj,C)
1· S J~/o 3SoG
5,] 3~OQ
6° 4UlO
0·) 4SSD lv 4'1 () 0
l-J S300
d?i? -54-~<O
g.J 5'15 0
),0 C'Io O
9> &70 0
( 0.0 70()O
/8 Yz 7'1DO
II 780 D
/I}f, <;3(6 0
12- <3S0.o
/2~ 8'3DO
/3 f qUJo
/?/z qSOD /7 1.~ ()",
1, Y1 -it t f /~J t Iv' ~ . /'
/'7. t)
;Z Jii .<F
j,Cj,C/
? tJ. t6
-75h o
,J'o }t',tJ
YIt7
i0t1' tjiJ) 50. (?
53· CJ
?O,O
07- 0
7/. 0
7J·~
$J,o
1r,O
/&tP, (;)
/t7, ,CJ
II:r, 0
117,0 /2:;, 'V 127,,0 ;;7y? .0 {, , .... J .
~.1v"$?!5
)/h f 1?A.t> v';' 'h /
j)ei2 .5JU/ f;sl 118 8e"Ylc- /......
/~~0· 7;: 7,,~fi jJl/l1~ No, I
W, t!; .(.,?
L, O. i> r"}
!.t'zd 1/A/115 v(yle,G e.-'YYle rn I (! orrn m-I l 'Yl is
0, ~~ L , t9 -
J" II ~ IO't-~ z-/ Z.O /0,(0- 5 Z.S" IISO fie? L(oo
} . .5 2'tc,0 <I,D '2...~ua 9 Y') ~('5 0
SIr£> ~~QD /4 J.3' 3&t 00 Ito ~,o 4l...00 a_A:.Ls h)/ t'.1'Yt~") 6'J 4S~O
Tro 4"'Jo o '2.0
j-S- 5'3c>0 :BrO Stec>o B,j-
5~SO 40 ItO t.'f{)of) 50 9,S- (;'700
/0,0 "7000 &'5 .(O·S "'{(:>u 1t;;
/1 7 e r,).,) 15 ,~ '3 (O 0 f!P
12... B'Soo 65 IS &~C)'C
C),? L .... I
13 92,..()O 97 I' .
IS- qsoo 1~I/cA/!e;
f (tOO#'-
2'~
q;: 1- 'I ks~ I
frJllJ-J "'" 'l.-O. 4~
..-:--
,~ , .:
'.' ..
TESf-#=9
JS" [) p/p/e. # I - Hz. AY~ := tJ, ~'I'7 /a~ J~
LccJ ul1l7~ [)/~PJ~rlf j, S Ib2-S ?D
:::J2Ack z.. f'--l6()
.S- (I$D
?:,S 2,{SO '-1.0 25bD
cr: - -t
Sf) ~
ft-"f;lu~
1- fI1ttj vlioT lee repe=/',te c::ilAe J-o (c("'J:e yo-":,.1 cA-!eY\:::./
fSef1c.~ Lo",r~p
j;.;,R J/J1 i;1-:""
D~ 2,,0 /~~
(Pitt :),' 1 ( ,YlT:) .,--.-.----... -.~----.- .. -"'. - ,-
I,S lc:.l. ~
2. /0""\"0 2,5 !ISO
-?
:J 'L.\OO
4 2<300
5 '?>?OO
Co .Ll'11>0
7 4Cz~D
S S't...t>O
9 c. '-H> 0
/0 t oeO
1/ ,q,Oo
12 0'700
/3 'I l.--D 0
/0
(7 rl If:,
19 2.0 Zl u:; z'(
ZB }J"l. ];3 -:p':)
--,Ie)
;)0
-;'C.> ~g
-;5 -;:y -' '
YO
1)'"' qa tl ~T #=/1
/-,.. ?. /0 ~r1 pC!..l pul-<" c;' v~a &' ~ .44 Cj
pr:' Die! lArds cifY]/CtG },::; Iv;?) ./ z /D':(O S-'
S "3 Q.\DO ~
S 4 2'tJoo 5
5 5 ~S6D 5
~ 4LC>0 C .~J
7 ACZoo I 3, 5(...00 I
10
C'iOO (0
Cj IZ 17
10 1 000 20 35
IJ 1 'boo 4<; t-J7
" f). I
? lZ :3SDO 07 .. i?·kfB? 1(' . '-
/3 .:1200 1 ~.,oo 1!
/ (/ '1Bo 0 ~16.7~Vf-/ c..--:- /Or;DQ I I
<..~
c {#1.-
pi
5
I Ct 1/ ~. 7/1
$' z} 4
~r z. t;' ~ . .r I.. \ • <;"" t'I<? , .. ..
~----------------------~
\ jJ
//
nit /// ;_/
/
,-
T I~I-1£;'-
1
.I Il.."
?S-
,
cr#, 1 '" .01 ___ :OJ
,~
... "\ I l.r- N t'-( L \
\ '," \
'4 1 -z:r (0 .. .~ L-
/ ~I
.:/ '5 • '3 /
! ", ,,' .,.-
//
\ /'
'" //'"
" ~--
....--;
...--/'.: ':
cf
5 1'-1 Ii I, 3
3 L
9 \
C--(t/? i /",'!. • .-.
,,,;----'. '5'1fi) /I /1 2- 1
#::: lW:.k.e-? I~+
J 2...- S 4-'$ ?
1'5 1."
1
C-r~8 ~ 5b 4?
I
I I
I I
Z-,r' f> . .tt I
-,
\ I ,',
C1 t:t 10
to 1 i
3 s
C> 2-
I , CriFII ~ - ~
$ ? ~
~ 5
I,S 2.,
APPENDIX C: LABORATORY DATA SHEETS AND CURVES
C.l -- Sieve Analysis and Atterberg Limits Test Data
- 20cl )
II J G ~z /2- 13
/.:; IS/~ if' " " I
(/
. 1/ /("
1/
1/
/I
J
I ,f . (
Ii 2'1 3r
2& N - t) /
I -I
" '1/ I .;; ~,
/.3' 1/ 1/
~~ /2 .~ <,.) 17
I -/ !
G, ~ 26 -
( -I
20 '·0 ~.---P 1 'lui 0 d r
~ 3 17 ;J /-
I " " ,- • 't 2 ~.
I f' I'
0 -f: /II
,·1 'I (;:;, .-0 NJ
~ 0 I 73 ,,'
7 N
I
" 0 - /':- I 'if ,;\,;~ /./
H )
'i
t, ~-"" 3 I 3,P
I 10 -},#> /
I ·/1
I "I t, -~" p iiJ
I I( I ~"" 31 G I z I
I
311
I _-4> fa :z .(
to/ 2
'I 9 3 , f - s '/ '2
r II r:, ,~,
\
I ./ )
f'L )
f(J ) )
G;
() 7,
I 2.,
I 14 I'
11 a,l
6- 0
C.
!?
- Z,CI )
I II tj I -;;} (, I 7-
I /0
.2 d () ;(,
17 3,t,
I
19 .;? 6- s--
~ r
,,: .: ( '"
(
MR- t
0-6 S--IO
;0 -1<)
15--20 20-'2..')
ZS-3G ~~-3::J
35-'16
YO-'-i$ YS--)-O
50-55
55-GO
Gl:: -b."5
b~-70
'7'5-~O
8c -8'5 " '65--'10 qty .. <-(5'
qs -Jet;
I 00 -/ <..,'G"'
/0"')-{lO
/(0-1i5 /IS-/20
,2(j-" .. 5 ('-5- 130 '30-12)5
/35--;40
1'"1°-I'i5"' 1'-15--\5'0
IS'O-tSS
10::)-11,.,,(::
Jfd::, -1b.'S
if::5 -II/) [7C- 175 ilS--j<:5b
l"6c-l"isS
I t\ '5' - ;'/0 Iq6 -(ct5" lG5-7...DO ZCc-2.u$"
'2P5"- ZCb
MR -2..
0-5 S-JC IO-iS'
jS-lO
2<.'-25
2:'5-?f:-)
3c -2):;
3'Y-'-(0
40-t..{.)
<-['5-5'0
Sc--sS" 5'·5-c;.0 &J-bS' (;''5-1 0
70-75
15' -'l$0
%'0 -'5$ ~~~'10
q Q-'f5 q~-IOQ
cf.r~~'1.-e...
.-Iv.eIL '7--"-j;;;
. {
IS- I~
Itt,> -20
2/,'8"10 /
2~ _Slf 1-0
,?6,O h
,.
( ;., I II '/ 1-0
.32'$ " fa
.? S' 1111 Iv ,
broteh ZZ' S /1
. 25 1 I' Jr Ie 2. (.).e ....
./2(n;
.J ' /I () 7
32 '" " _ Jc>. n ("i ~fa. ... ,-
35' J II
(N (;
. '72.. 2. 10 .'72- 1
151 J II 10 7$ 10 ~
~ 0 I 10 . 'S 0 / ~ /I
, " 95' (, II /-0. $7 I .
"ft. . ., t:) h; ~7.:;-
1'1 k 17,? S-
/()'2.) -1-0 lo!., 5
I I/O 16
37 '7 /1 +0 3'] I f TfL'/<. - Sp,t r- b .• J-~ .~ r..
III ... .. f.'l4
...... ""pSt· II), ... '~"""' .........
I I 40 & /1 h 40 II
I/~ I.-/-r; II
12'2,7 S r/-o /23, '2 r
I , ~
II.J
4 I II , II
1- II/a 4'3 4 I i'l
.-- ..
/2- 'f 10 12 . .t-t, r ... 45'4 1
/
2.. \ 1\ 1"5 I. r. ria 1 '3 Z. '/- .-
I II
'f7 I ( , IlL
/YO /~ 'TV I II
.-h /'-1/ .3 -ff ,0
/ ,1
10 IS Z I /) /5/ "1
.5'2 1;- Ii 1f',l,Y, lOS
/ (, '5. 2 S ICI 1(.',0 l-I • / I 12$ ~4 ~ It) f'~ I c/ I
/7,-/, ~ 1-0 17'5. r. r , r (
, 'if/, £'~ 10 {-~ 6(} C/ . leh,-r h 18<;.75
2~5'> ft; 2.0 ~ I ( ,,\ rrl~
..--....... -."'
H
" C2 1-0 PSi 22 g (3".h I 'I t'L 22~. tf , 10 '\ ... ". ~.'
2'$0 1-0 2. So. "-, " /.0 60S' \f~r 1-0 tLf ~ \ DS 2.7/.2) '2'77_
2- 1'7 .~ ~ '21S I
,07 e 1/ /-0 (. lJ / 2 '/ +, ~/S,'2,r 1-0 '3/"
'<':::D .' ". II -1-1"1 ?C::;, ,
c:' /1
1
/c\ .• j
flole tJ1D-/~
//(;5.2S 10 V&'/' C. " 1-0
.~ 40,''5'' k vS4 'SI/ 11) VI 51 3 (/
__ ~5C;' /0 {( -
I(,~ ·0
(PS' +'1 I l(j If
5"'5 I ( "
~ I /0 (
(.po' 4/1
tAl' {31( / ... ,' - 1/ -- (p'.j .L '
40f t /11 __
C,2J /0'
,---:: of"!- I 10 II "7- ~ I "f f
___ y5? .~., " 1-0 5"2 ~ S" : I (I I., I II
." v.41.b ,.. .tf'7 /1
,v_ :J-41 <8(/ fa 2..5< 2.. 11_
,_,_,,~:13 'I/! I ,/D 3() '7 'I .v/1.<;- -n,. 20 .. <5
,.,(, ___________ v/o2te',D' ( __ ,Lo.?,~',~' __ ____ , _ ' ", v. sq:., ( '9 d _ ~ '3 s ' 3 1/
__ "".3 Z I:> /1 -hJ ,.1'2 1(", I't .
_ _ _ v' . '21 ' 9 " ,1-0 2 2. I '2- /'
,_. ___________ , __ ,_ .. ,<42/ (/1 _ _ fo43' 4 v
__ v :3''1' 7" ., -rt)
__ ,__ __ __ _,/ .Itt {) I; ,/ ,. ,.39 I
I /' /4/ 5
__<7z. I 2 f , _ .. 7 L ''i "
___ 1/./5/,7 152.( ,
__ ~ 80 80 I C. / ~ "': Beg.Go 87 ',,/'1
__ ,,:, 124, 0 k /2.lf ,~
..( ~I 7) H Q7.)
;..-/15 1-1' I/S, 7~ VIZ r J- !~~. r-____ . 'L")., ',' (J . L ... ~ , '
1/, I/~ f.::, 1/ I
0/,/8,) -11 vlOS.S loG. .'l.t:; .
.), 1?'1, ~ ~ /7".5 j q~.() (-0 70.7s V /0 '2. r -16 ~c) ';.,:, 5 .j q , / m ?9. 7<;"'
5 /1''1 , .J
"!? /V1 . )
Cd4. V S-t' 7,Q vz..
,_~ Wi- <I--o.~ ~ ,/)?~ - ea,,"-v5'.L ?,r#A-'-'~ I
/l,., ~ - .. M.£.e,,1 ?VCl..-ov~1 __ . ~ )1')4, ~~, S~ .b'! r- $"( II-
5-./)11 ~ .. ~ ~ __ $-/11 . ""111" ",?ra V~_? ,
.f-:-IYJ - r~-~ 2 31
/ (:7/"'," e=,
__ ,_QJI't"t;,'h -:~_, ___ ,
' . . _61/l~· C~;;r .,(I1",'-C. ........ }'t!.__ _ 2,? "jJ'.7~~~ / -
, ___ /;1 e/ ?fI"-J{~~ ..... ;1-< _.'
,(;~e - pjl re.dCc~t <j(~~..r::: I C::',., ...... if n • . -./11-4' / .
SI- IV! 4-" -C:Y1t': ((1 ... )1
--,/JJd. C(),/(
' ___ '8r1.~ - 4A_'~ ~!, . /;/-C C41!; 1vY'l '--- /PI c.:; '1 J<s""-. ,
i'V' ~ /. --/ .-'\~ ~ 11,j/,.Y'
.. , .. , i.-"" / <
'_~- C-r:> "'? I Q'~ ,S-m n (;11 •. .' C lf1.i 1q. '-
I M- C-dr-'" '-'-0'""" . 1; ~ I "1r .,J • ...,
. S,/;Y1 l.AJ Vt '" ,., '7" tJ I,/..A- f YMln cor
/JI1 I--¢ C 0"".:: I ;:. ,"
~1·/ ~ I::' / ~ ,/
/YJ 1-0 C lA~ (0"'--. .
,,11'1 c6,,;1 /;{ro~-Rt:'! 1..! 'B '~ ,.s~ VIII ~ #'~r--r Vt-l C.!{,/ .. S"*'m 1C.'-otJtt-1 ~~(o.'/v\"
J
n I - C,t- IA"') I (/,,1 _ ,.~
.s-hl
o 0
(
-Co 0
o (IS-I" f
V /3/ 1 r I-r; y/o5 Ie
'-'
vE Co ?, I S {--(} 2.0'-1
~ 25a fa L <;C. <.::,
;?'2~ I '3 II -t-c. 2 '2. ~ '71( o '3 So . I g I' ~ 5/ 1:$ II
-'315,?S +-0 3 1('; Y2'17.t:;"" /.0 2'7.[3
1f1;J - 10
'",fe-' ,t.e) C /, tJ r/",
.44f}-/2 ~pk5 /&5- /g~.?5
, ~
2SQ - 2 SCI, t
.211.'2-~- 272-
l-CJ=?' $- 2..0"'; o'
jlf,r - I 7S.2.
/tJ2.S- - /63 I '1
$50 & - .1SI,S-
22~ '3 II - Z2-S ''1''3(t;,'2c.; - 31(..0
/),1 -c ct:/l--7 5/J1-7 M Cd)/
I'VJ co)! 5 -/"h /) rvk -Ii' J.-.
fVt - c.. 0, ' M - C <j(
S/Vl1 /U -C ~I C::'r:
1 '7!
/0
HA -II
/
5
'--'" /
/
.J (;)
/ j
if
551<~ '/ '/.5 11
(v8/to ll ~ :;.,3/
.J If /-'-
! '7 Ii L-._,
I _~ 90 I tf,5 1/
(;, If -2 I
/0 I_ /0 If. 51!
zot ~ 20('1 11
f ~. .3F t, If
/f
I ~- ~5!;
II
(q II
", (, I
/,-
r;. II ~ 3'1 ff
II
If
C),cO
/,00
/o.()O
0,00
/3. 07-
(0.
00
f·&1
/. (7()
7.10 'I /.23
{}.
/2.30
10,00
/1/.&1
It). 00
1/ I c;, -2
/ II I II g & 8 /1
(/0 -& D f S /(
~S - s f
I ( ( I
-\ /1
::: I ZZ,L:}
3Y1S L{O 2-9 I q
/3, I lllO /b(O
7/i {)Ot D ~
IZ\rt-l
,~ 30S·~a
,-/L/,9 l( 53f1
L/ '1 d:'5 /~ l(3,C(
(}()
C((J
faD
~{o
'07,'0 -7" 28 If 30S,Oc->\c,
______ ~ ____________________ ~ ______________ r-:_/_t_l __ ~~ /H4/S It<r.:..e. ~ -2.0Q I C(l.vt. f--~ -- /-
( . Z t; _________ _
~{.. "-s I 2S--;<$ 0("
4/3
---- 17 ~~"'--
I'? ~ II - 23 '" II 2.~~
'30 ' 301G.(~ /3.\CZ
- -'i-o' 3 .~'I 19, K"7. .
I II ~4.S 2. '2-. \ ~o
5,-:1
( 4,)11 Z~:'7-% 31>.
~'31 4, IS 'C. C!A1r..ch4!..
I&.~ tJ?u '31.7 ~'5~
( I
1,() "'"J
( I /1 g-S - 8'S 4,<;'
37.Z?o
IOQ I _ I()e) '2 h
, I( /10 - I/a J
,/S-/IS'4 11
I /I /20 - /ZtJ 2.r
( II .J()..... 134 2.r
35- 1-35/2.' , t") I(
/1-IJ-L''To ~.S' /~S 1- /tfS '3.) I(
150 - ISO' 2... I(
/JIJA - 1/
C IL.Z!
4 't II c I I I I
10 - /0 4-. ~
I '/I IS - IS &
4-3 I +3 I /0 t
S5 I - S's ' 2 II
..:::;, '2- "7 ..
.3f~
~J¥.s
j?:~"
II, l.;t,
(-
(.
-4 /(, /1 Iv ~ /
." ~ /1 10 fo'J II
IS I ~ IS 19,~/1
I I I' ZO 1-0 20 ;1.5""
.f'2 I 7' If -tb 32 I 2- /1
'33 It, /1 4 'Jtf I /1 II
3.$ ~ II /-r; Jf'S f
43 '~ II 1-0 -+"'1- I I . .;;-11
3 I IQ II fa :s 0/ I 3 I
/ I I ..
rv G;2'
~ 3 6. 1/ 1-0 c Y I 2. II
I 1/ ?3 II.~
:h ht-c- f eM IE" s~/k-
53 I ~ 1/..4J 51 I 4 /I
1 If '2 I . I 1/ ;.;0, S HI 3'3 t::j
"
3'-1,~ ____ %
'1.1/ az. J I
/11( - /
1
8
/'10.
J (
/
/
I
l
-80 (
5- 10 1
/5 -Jj} I
25- I
~95'
Ll5-501
/-, -- c?)D t ,j
foS'-
0,010
10,010
(),
/,00
/,00
0,00
0,
/.
0,00
0,010
00
/, CO
(
! , (Y\ Ct ~tLl\ e Co v"d::_t: If\ t.,
!MR-l ; I l&D W & '5-10 sc::,Y. L\ 65/.2. d. L{ C;v
516,-( /.yd}o 15-20 SLf8cS ~ ~
DS-,3:J y{0cl l..jbSc~ ~~y 0;0
) 3S- L IO Sj~.y SIY,Y Y.3% (
4S~.sO S8f.LJ Sb38 3, lol) I
5S-b6 Sq/,S S'bt,.8 ljIOC:PO (- -- ~
- -
bS -76 SS'-/,7 SDS 7 Y/ILJo
75-' 80 S9LJI7 5(.;,'7.3 4,8%
.. -.
/ t
MR-I S~)OI
Wo = S-S \. ;;)3 dO ,qSI
~() ldl.:J
66 80,S
',Yo bLJ, I
,Ztb 3-1./ : (~V\ 4~,z.. 8/i%
S50,Lj
ifv'lK \5 '- Zt:j
lCb:. SQb,"-\ S
.Do Illlq
'YO IQO,5
~ 7C{,
lLfO bQ·9
c9w 3d. 7 ,[tIVl G(,'~ '~,7%
S(:)~8
, ~fv'\ i<- 25 1-30'
LLt: ~ <-f G:., 5, q ,eX.) \ 58"(..J
: ljo /1(LI ,bb '-jO"b )L(O lj I. S-
c9CD Lf 5 l '-'(
:P6Y1' ~ c21.Cf/o , bS 3 Y , (:'IL
Mf<-l OSI_YOI
Wu= SJ 7,4-
Qa l &F{, q' Lto (dO,q feb 74,/
l\.{() ocr.q 'J-CO 3i,O
POf'l 71./ /3,5% 6Jb7
/,-,\ 1<-1 I r
Lf5-S0
Wo::- S77,yS
Do 10,8.S yO I d'-/,,3
60 -)3,S
1'-10 c;c'r q CJ..C0 3'-(,5
AJY\ l)() . I~.S <]0 S-r7,( 01,
Mi< -I ~51- bC/
We. := 511, I ("0- \'1 'G;( - c' \ ,- f,,' e e" "~' ::-..c".]_
Q)O () ~a 0 0/,
c;o 4 bl, L/ bO 70. L.l f <-(0 't/s,y ceo 15,0 rUVl 2;:),0 5~;) 0;'0
581.(-) "7. ) ( .. 't~oc,q-,
..... -
.MK-l G5~70r ll.b:: ~'-Id,G.
,(90 JO/. ~ ,LjO I ~S\ to .f::D '7°· Y [YO 5'-L \
Ploo tD I I ~PoV) J3.L f,.Q% G./O)o
SYd.0
,M\2. - \ l~ 1- '2])'
U-Z':::: 5~8IZ. ,62 6 I YO.,C) ~0 )58,l
GO ~'lh 0 /'-to ~l.\,b
:dCO 3510 fhVl, b II 0 /0.5 C;o
5 Gr I \ OK.
(
/'
M12-2 -----,
CS -/0
fb.:Jg (
J~ 3:, • -"- J
13S-Lf6
(rs- So
:s;-y - o,6
(~rs -70
75-80
-.to
-Sb
~70
/VtL .--
6,816
y~ 3O;c,
d QCk , \ 0
3'~<Jo u(Cjolo
d.5 (70 3" (:, cfrJ JO~ , '0 V
370,·0
L(l.(O,~)
5'-fC, 3
'--1 n. ,3
C-;Jc~ (3
IV/. ();5 bAe
)
/ .
CDlltClltS
f-itf2-L
(LA f< (
,)\~!\, ') - ( ( L i
"-
Ct VIC. \ Y 2> I'~ MR-2 ,~ ICLC .,' " t;. S -to LUo -= 3YQ'd y~- SO c0c>:;' 5~o(<C)
020 QS.8 --.- ._--~o !3112-
'-to 7J/J, LlD SIll
{O6 51, q . {;)D 1&(-2...
ILt6 586.5 IlfO c 101 C-oCt) d-' -bi2> ;YL"O
("- - C' ...) ~!e?
({.ifl 38/'3: '/ cf) / to ID n . rCl. v)' GJ ,;)::-' ,1/, 2c~z 3y8.rJ 53F(,,/
IS' -.<90 CJo:::: 3~37b~ . . " ". '.).. ( 5S-G.C) (..::t: ;; S /4/1 ()6 3Y,8 -4.9C 1:)-2. ,.5
'-16 ~~/3 lft ('".'- ~-
C61-':':::>
(;0 S~')("7 l?G 70 r,5' ,
l!.fo C! 0 ()~I ' flo ~3,8 ~-. 1"'1 ", lY,Ct .. ~ ,j.3.3 ~ ~L() .. e<Q)
'l 78,'2., ·1 ') nr::f) "~ Cj5, -1 -}
. fcen .lav" '1) F Q I 0< ltC",) to I, ,bA~~,
.' .. -'~'-'~~-"*--
3:>70,0 5-' L/ (3
[:-;-5 - 3 c::':' LJu - Slbl ( (;::=:). -70 uJ() :::... '-I12.q -dC' C) '7'Io/? dO 1011 7 yc; IL/)/~
~ ,--....... ( Ltt .o.:x I
~J 60 ~);)Ib b.o C:' 5 ';(, '~-
~,) ( --_I
-->; ~ C-' .--/ \ '" /<-)D /YO :J '-)- J
~" -> .... j '-)(., ~ .. (
\-'- (~. I :)(~, .;Reo J3 r 7 " I OlCO "'.J ,1 J.OiD ~ 9 0) 'j --'10 (~i )C~
/1:.d! J:> /0 16 r1 .LLJ -' ,I", L
.5i<L'-, Lf 12, L-
<.~5 -Yo CU:..; ;:. ~(fo(Cj 7'0-80 G.,.\-" :::. -~
"-12-1' () , I ... ·
'3>'310 C'I [).o &0 (L;0
'i6 0S~5 ~o Ci l, 5 .... L ~ (;0 S;;~5 f:oO
'~~>'2 )
I\; (5 ~J ' c~
~--~:- ,I,. )'5 ~ l (0 ! ').v 1'1.0 { '-to C "'_ ,~ { "
", ',-- \-"'" ~,.
~"-I )7 '{-'- ',' ~('. ()L.'() V'. / I ,; ~ I ,~t,,'r r)
~ I ---, Cr () ~t::::'" -- I "
rei ,'\ - ~ 0. I /i..." (ev, J I, -~) /'.1 :).1 '-I (. J I'r'~ ."~ ..
,_" .. /'" . I. I
I g
I I I~ I~
I ~ r--
I ii I 0:"'":>;
IH I~ I~
I
1- I I ~ =t 1 I I I
~
I I -1 fi
g
I:i;
...... ... -....
-... , ~.
\. ty
\,
• I 1\ \
...
\ \. \.
Lr.:i~ ~ ~ - --a:
C!DC!D~"""'" ::2:
IIIIUIi I I
~1ISI1C:!!ii:II N ........t~......ca ~ ~IIQ~
~ \. -,
I fl " \ "
\,
\ \
g
'\ \
\ \
\,
\
\ \
G.Il N --~ G.Il -Ii!,!iI .,..,...,...... ~ :0::.. ~ ~
I I i ... .D
! !
1---
I -~ ~Jl ~ ~ 5 ~
L~ I~ ~ ~~
1-I I ~ ! ~ g ~
~
w ~
• 5'=i!
e:..~=:§
p.
~
=- I I
___ I
. ...".
il----!/--- -
-I r---'---t--;
I I L- I
I t=F I
I i I I I
I i I r--i
&a;:.:r ~ e i g i ~ ~ I I-- I
I --_J!__
~ I ~ §
~
I Ii ii § I I ~-- I
I !i
T --I
I I I ~
I I =. -+-[~ I ~ I I I i
! ! I ---+-. .. :::;== ~ r----I ,;
~. I 1--- __ J,,-_ ~ •
I I I y --1---a i!
I + I I
I I ~~~
":;;ell I ! § ~ ~ ! ~ 9 il ! ~ C
~ ~
I I
I~
I i I
I~ I~
I-I I ~~~ I ~H I =
I~ ~
c
I . tL __ -.1
-. "==" eo
x P a s
1
s 69 • 1 n g 40
20
Bo~ing No. : MA-II
D19: 9 »39: 9.155 »69: 91695
Cu : N/A Cz : MIA
.........
.03
,""! ,/r
ptll : 65'
...... .,e.......-----
"""" ~-1
,..-t:1
I -.1
Pa.l&ticle Size
: 1
I ,
..EI ...,
"". .......
;/-..
am
1r .... ,.,.. ....
.&-...... F-""
. .,.,....F ~"'" I
..
1
~---I-"---T--" I 'r _._-~
I- := I 1 I ~! I t I I I r~"· "'-
li "0:=
i--t I I ! "n,
~ "a. I ~ ,- a~. --1 ~+ ! I SS_ -'.
@ . i I I I I "0
~ .. -a~e I - - • I J---t--l-_i e. fi ! \ -I
I I I I Oil I l-'--i--~--- I
~il i §
I i I I I w I I I I lt~
I I I 1:l~
i ~
=.. iii I I W !C'.~Ji
I I ~ t ± -~ ~ I ; I -- --- ~ ~.S=!
! ~ L...... I R I ~ .. ~ . I !~ --1 ~ I -~ r--I. -
~
,\==1 t'1-;;
w ~
j--t--+-~- i \ I - --, \~
\ I i--~- --~- -\1 I I ! 1 c:s
I I I -i i = = ~~~
m
~ ~ il ~ ! ! il ~ Ii ~ I I
I -.-~
~ ~ r~ u...ra ~...::r.
~
~= =""" ~ ~ 1llf\l ~$li o!!=!! ~ ~
J--I 1 __ -
-----jj"
I
---"1-
o:!.." !:-~
• ll='!!
~
~ p=[i
~ ~~~
-1
-1 r ~-T-r~1--·~-~--+--·f~-l - ~~--I . ~ p= •• -l ~ _........J.--__ ------r-II I I 1· .. ·.1 ! L-_ B I I I I I .... ~ I I -iI--- -+-ij-----{l
II I iii r~~- I I I I I i -1-- i ~~il-ii ____ il-I __ -+; ---~-----i-~II I I - I "I i ,.1 1.1
Him I I I I "g. I" _.
III ri -- L' I \ I I -r--1I!i il"i ~ ~ § m 1ft. ~ I ,----r-- ---I - ---I -- ------J-.--~ 8 .; ; I 1. I
----II I I I f\ I !l 11 il I I I ~. ~ II I I I 1\ I I F=t= -1-4; - =c I r- I - ._-----r--- ~---r- ---1---I 1--1-- --t i -t-~ -----Il-i-; I I- ---.-1 t -----r--t- --t--I ~ I I : I ~
-li • ---1 I -+---~ ~
~~ I ·--lt1 __ ·-!i ____ -18!--___ 1· __ -i!-_·_~----+-- .~---~ lei \1
! I I ~
___ Jl
~~ ~
--II
I II
It I!..t":iI
• II
.
II""ICiIII:""- Li"':fI II:""- II:""- 1('1!.3 \ICSiI ~ II:""- ......0 - - -U'"".)~ (SII (SIIISI '" ...
CT"e.....-l
I I I I D I I I I i
~ (S;lI
I:ii{ -., !'-.
.......... -".
r ..... .... .."
""h; -.., ........
-iL
~ ...
"s
\ I
~I I\,
-\ 3.
~ ''\.
\ \
Q.iII H --c..")J
Q.iII -IC..:s .......... -
"' ........
.c~>
~ l1"'li$ ~
x p a s s 69 . 1 n 9 49
29
9
BOfing
D19: 9 226 D39: 9. 667 D69: 9.
Cu : N/A Cz : MIA
-
-1 Depth: 15-29'
-.1
Pafticle Size
: 2
1
~ .........
' ..... .......
"o.
""" I~
\ e~ ~
~m '1
'. \~
.. -ItSIItSI
I I II I nun (SjII ItSI (SjII :::I H ......... ~.......oaw:- aw:-~~~
~""-..... •
"-
'\"\.
'\
'\, '\
\
l13.li H .-~
l13.li ........ c.:a
.......... --........ ~
~
~ .......
eO. ., .......... ....
r-.....
.... . ... \
r\ '\
\ \\
\ '. ~
\
\
'\, \,
\
CIQI......-I I I ~'I...!C!
~'I...!C! - .. I(S;!II(SII C'S)I
unn I I I I
I(S;!I fIS'I fIS'I :::::$ H ......-I~'I...!C!~~ ~~~
9 ........
-.... .... • .....
.... .. n~ .. ,
r--... U a
~~
nL
\ \
t.' It
r'BA
_\ ~
\
\
\ \
\ ,
11:"'-11.1"") --II O""'e C"...:II....c ... ..
lIS (SII(SI!
II II II II III
(SI (SI(SII ::::$ H --ll1IC"a":)I.....ca~~ \!IQ\!IQ~
y.
p a s s 69 • 1 n 9 49
29
BOl'ing I: MR-l
D10: 0.129 D39: 91446 D69: 9
Cu : 0 Cz : MIA
- -- - -~
Depth: 55-69'
1·_··--
-,..,.,.. .... ,.c; ....... --
fl8- ... '" ",' LoI
1-.• -
a1 Pal'ticle Size
-.----------------.l Mhel' : 6 - -------_ .. _- -- -- ----
,
J ,. ~.
l 1./
/i' .I
/ ..... l2"
....... 11"
1--.......8'"'"
1
y.
p a s 5 . 1 n
1
g 48
20
o
I
Bo~ing Ho. : MR-l
D10: 0.102 D30: 0.384 D60: 0.788
Cu : 7.75 Cz : 1.84
---- ---C·03
Depth: 65-70' HltMhe~ : 7
/ ...... ... JR ......
ppD
m"
P"! __ -~ ~
l------ ~ -- ".,... ~
.1 Pal'ticle Size
~ ,I
/ i
./ ,"
l
.i I
~ ... I I
1
1
'ng NOI :
1
"l IH
~j0
I D19: 9.975 ! D39: 9.229
D60: 9.518 P Cu : 1.69 a I Cz : 1.12 s s 60 . --1 n ~""n ... ' __
9
29 I r-rrulm!1Ulm~21$iI.
o ....-1 ........ -/···
Depth : 15-
...... ~ ......
_<"e/~-·
I--" w· r.r ~ ..
./
.1 Pal'ticle Size
: 8
.".0'/
/ v"
~ ..
.e l ,,,. II
," 0 ." ...
i ...l ,,' I l
l2"
- 1
I I
1
x p a s s 69 • 1 n g
29
BOFing No. : MB-2
D19: 9 D39: 9.179 D69: 9.559
Cu : NIA Cz : MIA
,.' /<'
I/D3 ./
,
Depth: 5-19'
.. ~ "",,'"
..l""'/ .. '"
V ~ V j.tI
.J/
II PaFticle Size
-'
e I' ... 1 i_m •• ,_ .. tl ,-"""""""""-~~"-~
I .........
I J
I I I
" l~" .111'
m"
"'w' .!" I
.. .... 1"
I r:r" ..... , I .. .. '
,p.!'
I J ... "" l-' .!",,- I .. k
f> ...... J
I I
I
.1 J 1
x p a s s . 1 n g
199
29
9
BOFing No. : MR-2
D19: 9 D39: 9g9S6 D69: 9.293
Cu : N/R Cz : N/R
Depth: 15-291
.... ....... ......
109
.1" .. -
",,""
" .' r:lf' ,-./"
!,l rr(i'
II-I
I
/
I
.1 icle Size
: 2
[.:l ........ ,...-
....... .. ' ..... .....
/-" .. ...tf
oF" ,e ...... 1m .......
I
J 1
G:I. ..... ..
'--....
w •
...... ..... .....
r·~ .....
"-..II.':)JI.t":!!
• I II:"-CO ......... ~ .. .. i.Si.S1CS
ICS)
BIIU II UBI
i.S ICS) \CS1I :::::ii H ...... ~~i(....:Itc....;m ~~~
..... 6
as
""--U
i¥\
II
1 I,
.. ~
\
\
\ \
1 l 'i
I
l(1.li H
-l1'""li
~
l(1.li -c.::a ......... l1'""li
-~ ~ Ii"I$ ~
x p a s
1
8a
s 60 . 1 n g 49
20
9
Bo~ing "0. : MR-2
D10: 9 D39: 0.128 »69: 9.583
Cu : "/A Cz : "/A
//
./ ~-------
Depth: 35-401:
./
....... ..".... ...
~. ~"""ef
.~ v/
.1 Pa~ticle Size
.. n
~ ...... ......tl .
: 4
1 I
/" ;a-
"" .... ......" ... la-.......
/m-V-"..!'
1
x p a s
199
89
s 69 . 1 n 9 49
I
B01Ping w --
D19: 8 D39: 0.113 160: 9.421
Cll : MIA Cz : MIA
/ /
Depth : 45-59'
.... "" ........... /'
/
~ ..... ~
.tF
I~ /
.1 Papticle Size
,a-= ...... 1...-......
: 5 -
.. v ..a
~/ 1.00"
......
/.J' IJCl
/ I
1
x p a s s • 1 n g
111
9
Bo~ing No. : MR-2
D19: 9 D39: 9.117 D61: 9.461
Cll : N/A Cz : NIA
-'
/ ,/
,,/ /
Depth : 55
/' /'
.... .. / ............
l,..-" .... W·
r-tf
.1 Pa~ticle Size
: 6
...... w.l' ..
iIo'
_~ .. r
-l
l..Iu·-
~
...... .... ""'""
~ ...
-I-- Fo-
-p. ... Fo-
-........... 1
~~ng No:..,: MR-2 I Depth: 65-79' NUMher: 7 ~
19: 9 39: 98128 69: 9.411 eu : MIA Cz : MIA
~/
" ,~
._" 0·03
/"'
.... / ..... "'"
~ ..... ~..-
l ...... / 1,;1
.1 Pal'tiele Size
~ J" ....
y""'" loa ....
PIt" .... J .. .
". ... ",e
.,." .. .,." ......... 1:1
p.o'"
--
I j
1
n r:;; -, ~, .. , ~
"a".
~'\. " .
cor:--I I ~r:"-
....-I~ .. -liS (SII (SII
I I I B m II I B II.
(SII :::::$ !lSI ....-I~ ~~
.... -.. i
K ... \ \
~ ---. \.
I~ '\
"
\ \
,
\
G.II H .......
('.;.")
G.tI -iC.:) ....-I ....... ........... ~ ~ ~
~ B. ~
\ u\
all"
~ .... ~
" .... ...... ~
\ =-\
I.
\
.. .. i!SfIi!SfI
I. I I lIB II II
i!SfI i!SfI i!SfI ::::; lSI -t ~.....oc....;. c....;. ~~~
I
m
i~ ..... -,
~ ~
\ ,
\
I
i
\.
\ \
Q.I lSI --~ Q.I -~
-t.--......... ~ II1"II$ ~
:t:
p a s
199
89
s 69 . 1 n g 49
29
e
Bo~ing I: MR-2
D19: 9 D39: 9.113 D60: 9.421
Cu : MIA Cz : MIA
/ / -
Depth: 45 ... 591
/
/'"" "....../
¥ .....
~ .....
$ /
.1 Pa~ticle Size
,....e--" ...... rJ""
: 5
......... ~
".../ p'"
_ .......
/ .. / A:I
,
I
1
',-
. I ~
1="-~ n a
,
I I i ~ Ii . "-e i i ~
co ! n -'.
I D . .....
". " . . ~ Q,I ~ I ::.E
== :z:
.~
\ ... ..
-IISD 100
• I.I"":a
... 11\
• r ~
.-l!""- \. I I -... .-........ ~ ~ \ IQ.II ~
\
\ \
I \
~ I " ~ 9 \ ! q ~ ,
~.- ~ a " a \
I "
I 100 Ci""a I 00..,.0 ....-tlliid"" I - -<::C<::C
IiSlI ~ l(Sll .......... ~ I I I I I I ::z::z: B
• I • B I D II ! B ft ~ 5 I ICSI cs:u CSll :a N
I .......... ~...O~~ ~~~
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
Project ______________ Job No. __ S_·_<;_C_-__________ -,--_ M :?llt ""j
Location of Project Boring NO/I .. / l - f {) Sample No. .,:) (, - v
Description of Soil ___________________________ _
Depth of Sample ______ _ Date ______ _
Liquid Limit Determinatio/l
Can no. I 2- .7 ' .. l
wt. of wet soil + can 61#8 5''(-. e( S-S' ?; 61. L
Wt. of dry soil + can 5cP r I 52. (0 5''5,5" c,'Lq Wt. of can 31.7 .-1 f. lJ 68,~ 40·7 wt. of dry soil ((,,'2- 1l,L) I"· '-f 2'2·'1.
wt. of moisture 2.C, D 2·'>-)0 "40 4(~Q
Water content, U;% J.rjb {'7.1 0 2.&_(\ ~r2:4>(n 1&l,.13-n No. of blows, N ~O ''2. 1 11 4--3
? L Flow index F j =
z,f • I Liquid limit = _,'7,
v-\../ t../
( ! ~ 20 0
:: .; c: 11 Q)
C
i . :
I • I'
Plastic limit = Z-Q 11 Plasticity index Ip = ? ~.,)
I
-. /-./ ,~)
0 1'(; (J
.... Q)
I
1 -; I 3: n
I
: 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 80 100
No. of blows, N
Plastic Limit Determination
Can no. S-Wt. of wet soil + can 55., wt. of dry soil + can 52 -'1 Wt. of can :A. I Wt. of dry soil I~.~
Wt. of moisture 'lo'lD
Water content, U;% = Wp 70 rJ1 ..
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
Project _.:::5:::......oS~C_,., __________ Job No. ____________ ----;-__ I I 1/
Location of Project __________ Boring No.AIA -10 Sample No. Je) - 30 ~ Description of Soil ___________________________ _
Depth of Sample ______ _ Tested By ________ _ Date ______ _
Liquid Limit Determinatioll
Can no. f '2 "3 wt. of wet soil + can 6'-{,'j I; 7, ~ 5e·7 Wt. of dry soil + can 52·3 54-.> ~.<J wt. of can "31· '1 40.0 3&;,0
wt. of dry soil \ 1..tq tl{.~ 1, COo wt. of moisture '1. .~ /) ~dO l.ttO Water content. 1(;% 2.O.\G, '2.L'3S [tt. ?>'1 No. of blows. N ,., '" '- I, 3 (':)' 17
J v
23 J ,
2Z I
~ 0
9 2.(
i : -- I
C I Q) - lc. c: 0 u
I
I I ... Q) f'i -co
• I • . i J
~ I:' I
: 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 80 100
No. of blows. N
Plastic Limit Determillatioll
Can no. S wt. of wet soil + can S'O,7 wt. of dry soil + can ~o,iO
wt. of can ]'1. I Wt. of dry soil q.q Wt. of moisture \P\O Water content. w% = lOp lq.l~
'/
5i,S
J(,l 3':;- '? 7·-.J
12.· i z.. tOo
2'2·~ '0
27
Flow index Fi - __ _
Liquid limit -..::2,-C..3 __
Plastic limit - lq. Ie,
Plasticity index lp = 'f
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
/" Q /' jJ i I If "':::>Jl...- M ~ -II ;J'J /, ':>. / Project ___ -=--= _________ Job No. ___ --'I'-,,·.-'-'-I_-'-'-_~...J'""'C""__-.::...c -= . .l.:....I-=u
Location of Project __________ Boring No. IYlA -I I Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil ___________________________ _ , I I (
Depth of Sample 30 -"30 b Tested By _....;&"'--fNl _____ _
Liquid Limit Determinatioll
Can no. I '2 ... :3 ~
Wt. of wet soil + can 61.3 ss I "'1. 2.. 0)./. wt. of dry soil + can ~g.<-l 5:2., I 5.:r,l (,,0,,+
wt. of can 4/. '1" .~14 3',.0 41 ~ wt. of dry soil 17, a 0 I :I. ') 0 20"CJ ) e , '&U Wt. of moisture 2.qo 5l. ,"7 e:J '].)'0 3,3C Water content, ll:% \,.~ I ~,D) l Co • q I n, SS No. of blows. N g7 '28 20 /1
I Flow index F j - __ ~
::.-!! I~ 0
::
I ".
r I ---~---- I I
'" Liquid limit = __ _
Plastic limit = 12· 9 % ~ c: t1 Q)
C
o' ! -' .. t--·t---.J---.1 L . I I r I
Plasticity index II' = __ _
0 (,) 1(. ....
I I
Q)
t\1 :: /5
I
I
I 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 80 100
No. of blows. N
Plastic Limit Determillation
Can no. .s Wt. of wet soil + can 54.2-wt. of dry soil + can 5"2. ' I
Wt. of can -10 ,3 wt. of dry soil 11,6 wt. of moisture 2-,10
Water content, 11;% = tV p 1,,0,;>
~o
I " /1.
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
Project --.::-S=...::5::,.:L:=-__________ Job No. _____________ _
Location of Project __________ Boring No . .41 A -/2- Sample No. (;:, "- Z I
Description of Soil ___________________________ _
Ct /1 - Z. I Depth of Sample ______ _ Tested By __ Q-!-..:....fV1 _____ _ Date 2125/~e Liquid Limit Determillatioll
Can no. / Z.- '3 .q
Wt. of wet soil + can t /' I :ft., . ...j '5 t:t, / ~O'-I
Wt. of dry soil + can 61. ?:. t;.L !" I L. <5'7,t-
Wt. of can 3~·l-( !d· 3 41,3 4L .7 wt. of dry soil 17'~ I, . ., /'-{. ? 1~'5 Wt. of moisture 3,.'S g,~ ~ I / 3. 2-Water content. (c% Z-/. Z '3 ~ " ,4 z.. 'J 1,(.) '7 Z2.u7
No. of blows. N 4c; 1.7 ?-'-{ Ie;-
I Flow index Fi
( . ,
~ 1 0 Z, 3
I I i • I l I
'7 Liquid limit -_o=--_ Plastic limit - Q.2'3 ?
...: c
I I I Plasticity index Jp = CI)
C 0 (.) 12-... CI)
I I I I I I I I I I
(0 -' :: I
1-1 .1 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 80 100
No. of blows. N
Plastic Limit Determillatioll
Can no. 5 wt. of wet soil + can 4S,7 Wt. of dry soil + can 4S,/
wt. of can .1?; . (..;>
wt. of dry soil t., r Wt. of moisture (j,&
Water content. te% = IV p 1·2'3
. / ')
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
Project __ -=5~5-=C=---_________ Job No. ______________ _
Location of Project __ /U_rL_y_t_~__I_e-A------ Boring No. M A -/'2 Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil __________________________ --,-_
I If I I' I / Depth of Sample 30 '3 - '32 'f1 Tested By ___ -'C,<--_VVl____ Date '~ '1 ,~<8
Liquid Limit Determination
Can no. t '2_
Wt. of wet soil + can & ,? 7!, r" <f.;;-Wt. of dry soil + can 57·7 57. I
Wt. of can 71, {" J?;,7
wt. of dry soil /~.I /7· '1 wt. of moisture C. ,(0 7·'-/eJ
Water content, !c% 33.1 ,/ .., 2. $
No. of blows, N 4 0 '5<"':' ,
\ 42. 41 4-0 21 ~
" 3c"
--
35 at 'S3- ,--
)'\. '\
I
I "- J
..•. ~
\1
~ ~ i\ i\
'j \
'\.I~ X \ . I '" \
I ~\ 1 -~\
' : I'\.. 10 15 20 25 30 40\,~0
No. of blows, N
PI !lstic Li III it Deterlll ilia! iOT!
-Can no.
Wt. of wet soil + can
Wt. of dry soil + can
Wt. of can
Wt. of dry soil
Wt. of moisture
Water content, !c% = w!'
3 'T . r-:.tf)., 4>&.2-
53 r c:- [;',1, '1
31./ 40,S
ICfCf /1-'7
~ ~''-j 0 f3,B>o
"f 4.b{ ~/ 2.7
z."- /~
Flow index Fj = __ _
Liquid limit - __ _
Plastic limit = __
Plasticity index II' = __ _
60 80 10 o
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
Project __ ..c=s:....:5=--L __________ Job No. ____ . _________ _
Location of Project _~Il1~~-'-./-I-,_~_.&-f,e'---''\,:::.--____ Boring No. NIbil... Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil ___________________________ _
Depth of Sample (j (- {; 3 I Tested By __ -",C::.:,.---,P_l_/,-I ___ _
Liquid Limit Determination
Can no. J ?- ::? "I
Wt. of wet soil + can yf" .. f 5:1,/ 5'7,(, C;l." Wt. of dry soil + can 5'; 't+ 53.-' t:;')... ~ 55,7 wt. of can '31· 7 3~,s 3 B, S'-- 37. ~ Wt. of dry soil 13" /e.;,y> /'-1,0 16.(
Wt. of moisture S; I 0 S. LfD 5/ ( 7) (tp,1--t:!>
Water content, lC% ?JI/7- ~'\.~ 3~ ,bo( 3t6,~ No. of blows, N '2'3 .,if"":, ; 'lG.
I Flow index Fi - __ _
I Liquid limit = __ _ I ' "
~ ) 0 3>~ 3 I
: Plastic limit - __ _
.; c
I Plasticity index Ip = __ _ Cll -c: a (,) ':J7 ....
I ... I I
Cll -l'CI
~
f-- I
I I
I
3('" : .. 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 80 100
No. of blows, N
PI astic Limit Deterlll ilia tiot!
Can no.
Wt. of wet soil + can
Wt. of dry soil + can
Wt. of can
Wt. of dry soil
wt. of moisture
Water content, lC% = tV p
j .'
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
MR-\ S- )0' Project _____________ Job No. __________ '---___ _
Location of Project _________ Boring No. ___ _ Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil _______________________ _
Depth of Sample _____ _ Tested By _______ _ Date _____ _
Liquid Limit Determillatioll
Can no. 3i 2b l:::: Wt. of wet soil + can LJ2.0 LII, Lc Y3,o Wt. of dry soil + can 3c1, (=' <-)3,2- 40, C{
C Wt. of c~~) JlIl r9f/IO C)n, S-
wt. of dry soil t ',3 )'-\IL- \ \ 10 wt. of moisture 3 ~ 3,~ Water content, w% ?lo 1 I.e 1-. "D. 'L L~t3 No. of blows, N ~l 2b 2-3
\, ! \.; 3<.. r , -:,\ \ I
'\ I
~ 3D 0
S
\ I \ :
.: c: 2~ Q)
C
\ )( I I
\ r 0
c.'D (,) ... Q)
\\
J iii I ~ 81
I '\ X
2(" : \\
10 15 20 25 30 40' 50 60 80 100 "
No. of blows, N
Plastic Limit Determinatioll
Can no. 00 O""L Wt. of wet soil + can LjL'2.. LfZ,Q Wt. of dry soil + can 3~.3 3Q,Cj Wt. of can Z9,() 28,1 wt. of dry soil 10,3 I \ I L.-Wt. of moisture I\~ L' \ Water content, u:% = W p l ~ 1'-\ lCU'S
"ZCJ LJZ,3 3c(, :....{
d .. , ,--,b4/
/0.1
2·Ci ?. (? \
6)0
Flow index Fi - -2.Y,\..fb Liquid limit - '2 '6, '2.%-Plastic limit = __ _
Plasticity index I p = __ _
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
(v\ /'2 - I I <.- ? c... Project ______________ Job No. ____ . ____ v_-_L ____ _
Location of Project __________ Boring No. ____ _ Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil __________________________ _
Depth of Sample ______ _ Tested By _--=)'--M. _____ _ Date _____ _
Liquid Limit Determillation
Can no. I d- '3 Wt. of wet soil + can 39,0 '-/1,0 3~.o Wt. of dry soil + can 3b.3 J,/6 3St~ wt. of can r9-D's d'bob d7/~ Wt. of dry soil l,'l5 Ci ,-z.. 'tID Wt. of moisture I,l '3 cL. "3 1"'2-Water content, u:% 3L\·& 3'-1,/ LlO to No. of blows, N<
1': 3~ d) dO
s-i... 5-1
S""Z.. ~ SD 0
:3 4~ ..;
c: l\G Q) - ljo.( c: 0 (.) l\ '--... Q) '-10 -(I:J
~ 3'B
\ , \ ,
\ , ~ 1
\ , f\ ,
-t-\, ;-. 1
1'\ 3-'0
, k I I\.,
3L1 10 15 20 25 30 \40 50 60 60 100
No. of blows, N
Plastic Limit Determinatio1l
Can no. S f Wt. of wet soil + can 3b'~ Wt. of dry soil + can 3)l ( Wt. of can 6J'tstl r, ~.Z oj
Wt. of dry soil b,y /
wt. of moisture IcY Water content, u:% = tv p 21,9
Lf '-13, L-/ 2)6,1
()/i. I 'fICo :YL/· L\q.O
17
Flow index F; = )28
Liquid limit = '-II Plastic limit - 2 .. V1'
Plasticity index I p = I q. I
(
.l.
/ , )
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
Project ______ /''-'~_-_I ______ Job No. ____ " __________ _
Location of Project __________ Boring No. ____ _ Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil _________________________ --:-__
Depth of Sample __ /_J_~_Z_D__ Tested By _________ Date __ .2.,-I1'-.2_(,+-I_$_l5_' _
Liquid Limit Determillatioll
Can no. If- Z 3
Wt. of wet soil + can 39.8 yS.5" 3',£.1
wt. of dry soil + can )fo . .5 33.0 33.<.0
Wt. of can ZfJ· S:-" 21.8 ZB.f -wt. of dry soil 8.0 ":J. t! 5.2.
wt. of moisture 3·3 7...5 2·S Water content, lC% t.j.f.lS if 8. I if 8. /
No. of blows, N tj-O 30 2S
J ,0 'f'I
~ 0 'f8 := 'ft
~
c l'& tU C 1'.5 0 (J
114 ~ Q)
113 ~
~, I '~ i\ !
. ..1:. , \i
'. "---
"~ ------ --t
1\ -. I I \\ I s: '1-2
't,
-. >':\ I
: \ , 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 BO 100
No. of blows, N
Plastic Limit Determillation - I Can no. ~r (..
Wt. of wet soil + can .2.9.(p /I.{
Wt. of dry soil + can 2. 1. r II. J
Wt. of can 28.B If), t-
wt. of dry soil 0.::; 0,1
wt. of moisture 0./ 0.2.,
Water content, IC% = IVp /If.3 28·0;
I
~1J3
3 <f. tf
;2:;. 'f
7·0 3.cf
'-18. &
18
Flow index Fi - ~9 .2.3
Liquid limit = if",. 8 10 Plastic limit = 2J If) 'I,
Plasticityindexlp = 25"·3570
- '/. Z 3
)
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
Project ____ '_\1_rz_-_' ________ Job No. _______________ _
Location of Project __________ Boring No. ____ _ Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil _________________________ --:-__ _
Depth of Sample __ 2_J_-_.3_0 __ Tested By _________ Date _z+I_ZS'_It--I_B_B __
Liquid Limit Determillatio/l
Can no. I Z .3
Wt. of wet soil + can 3f}.1 3 {" 't 31.1 wt. of dry soil + can 31p.O 3'1. Co 35'·(,.;,
wt. of can 71·f 21' :t 28.2-
Wt. of dry soil .8.0 (P. ') 1· '-I wt. of moisture 2. / /. 13 Z.I
Water content, w% :< 1. 'fZ 2'-.09 2fJ·38
No. of blows, N 32. 23 IlP
I
I
~ ~ I 0
:: ~
;50 c: 1.1 Q) -c: 0 t.) n .... Q) Xc -til ~ IS
tY
I , : ~ I
~. I
~ I .~ I
-~ - -- - -'>1',,-
I ~ : ~
"-10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 80 100
No. of blows, N
Plastic Limit Determination
Can no. S 0
wt. of wet soil + can 32.:;-wt. of dry soil + can 32.0
wt. of can 2B.8 /0.",
wt. of dry soil 3.2-
wt. of moisture (J·t Water content, to% = tVp 1-1.68
~
'13.3
39.Q
2B·tf
1/. S
3.tj-
29· (p
10
Flow index F j =~0 ~ Liquid limit - :<.r. b PIe>
Plastic limit = :2 I, 8/J "'J",
Plasticity index Jp = _,;J.l..!: /'ID
\
)
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
-I Project _______________ Job No. ________________ _
Location of Project _________ Boring No. ____ _ Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil ___________________________ -,-__ _
Depth of Sample __ .3_J_-_7'-_O__ Tested By _________ Date ~/2S Js_B __ _ Liquid Limit Determinatio/J
Can no. 2. /
Wt. of wet soil + can tf-Z. T f{-2.8 '16, .r wt. of dry soil + can .fCf. t 3~· 5 ¥2,?
Wt. of can 28.9 28.S 3 0 . .[0
Wt. of dry soil IO.f3 11.0 12.2-
Wt. of moisture 3.0 3.8
Water content, lC% 21·-78 :30.0 31. IS"
No. of blows, N /fO '1.,8 25'
~
~ 0 31. S 31 ~ c: go OJ -c: ;('1 0 U JjJ ... OJ n -1'0
...• I -I-"'-, I
~ i -
'J !" I ~ I '" I ~ I " 3: tv
;H I ~ : "
10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 80 100
No. of blows, N
Pla8tic Limit Determillation
Can no. J- ~
Wt. of wet soil + can ;Z 8. ft. /0.1
Wt. of dry soil + can :2,& . .s- /0.8
Wt. of can ")..8. 0 10. f
Wt. of dry soil o.J o·t Wt. of moisture (2! , I O. /
Water content, w% = LOp 2.0 1'/.3
It
til. 3 3$.z.
28, (c;
1. ("
3. /
32.3
1"7
Flow index F; = - &."11
Liquid limit =
Plastic limit = I r· IS' jI'" 13. 9.r t>/~ Plasticity index Ip = ___ Ii.
)
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
/{I< -2 Project ______________ Job No. _______________ _
Location of Project __________ Boring No. ____ _ Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil ________________________ -;---:,----__
Depth of Sample __ .5_-_1_° __ Tested By _________ Date __ z-'I_~_,?~t/l'__8_S __
Liquid Limit Detcrmination
Can no. ! Z ,3
Wt. of wet soil + can !! 7. 8 I-iO,/29!J '1-0.0
Wt. of dry soil + can .1.5',.5 Ci I J5,9
Wt. of can 21.3 21-1 28.3 Wt of dry soil 8·?. 8.2 -1. it;
Wt. of moisture 7'.3 If.S If-. I
Water content, w% .51. .If't 52,'7'1 5}.15
No. of blows, N 39 ~'30 .2S
I
I
::R. 55' 0
3 5'1 ...: c 53 Q) ....
52 C 0 U 61 .... Q) fir .... co ~
'~ I ~:
Iltv ~-
I ~.
I " ~ i I" --I I "-
" I I J I
10 15 20 25 30 40.L 50 60 BO 100 z.
No. of blows, N
Plastic Limit Determillation
Can no. tf wt. of wet soil + can 2'1.=; Wt. of dry soil + can 29, f
Wt. of can 28.8 Wt of dry soil 0.&
Wt of moisture tJ.3
Water content, w% = tVp 50
S
'f'Z.Z
.1;'5
28.S 1'.0
if· 1 52.:< Z. 20
Flow index Fi = - '1-'1 + Liquid limit = 3'1 %
Plastic limit =
Plasticity index I/' =
ATIERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
(\;1 P- z / ~ '"'r)l Project _____________ Job No. __ 1_ v _____ ---:.._'----'=-0':.-'_'-__ _
Location of Project _________ Boring No. ___ _ Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil _________________________ _
Depth of Sample _____ _ Tested By _______ _ Date _____ _
Liquid Limit Deterlllination
Can no. III 30 cS 19 wt. of wet soil + can yz, '-I '-11, 1 51. '6' S-I. <i wt. of dry soil + can 3cL 3 3Ci\L\ LJGI~ C;S-Ib Wt. of can aco .. Y" ;yq 0 d C1,6 (J- ~
" , D. I
Wt. of dry soil IO,~ ;01'1 il,~ J G\q Wt. of moisture 3. \ ~I~ ~(O SI8 Water content, tc% "L"lS,l 3\.1 f)l,7 3Y.3, No. of blows, N L// 30 zs Ie,
I . -17.5
Flow Index Fi - __ _
I Liquid limit - 3?.Y, ') ~ 35 0
:: "- I
"- I Plastic limit = __ _
C I Plasticity index I" = __ (I) -c: 'I. 0 u I "
... (I) 3c~ -;
: I ""
~ I ",-,
~ ',21 10 15 20 25 30 40 5060 80 100
No. of blows, N
Plastic Limit Determination
Can no, C-Z) 0/ Wt. of wet soil + can Lf 1,0 4 2 / 0 1 0
Wt. of dry soil + can 3'6,1 '-/0·8 wt. of can dll l C). 0, 1 Wt. of dry soil 11.0 , d. \ wt. of moisture 2\) 2-D Water content, tc% = IV p 10.Ci L 3.'
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
( Project ____________ Job No. _M<--_k_-_"2.-=-_-'"?--"'<S'--'-3"""-""0'--__ _ Location of Project _________ Boring No. ___ _ Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil _________________________ _
Depth of Sample _____ _ Tested By __ J_0 _____ _ Date _____ _
Liquid Limit Deter7llilwtioll
Can no. -I L -3 Y Wt. of wet soil + can Y5.0 If ~J~ Lj G (l l.f '--/,:) Wt. of dry soil + can Li /,3 lf3,5 YI,~' 40,(rJ Wt. of can 30,0 L~\q L '13. b ]D,'8 Wt. of dry soil IL~ I Y'(::;> l31c iL~ Wt. of moisture ~tl 5,\ LiP( 3\( Water content. u:% ]2..[ IY,~ 3/. \ 31 .. ~ No. of blows. N 3<-t 1"8 l~ IS-
I Flow index F; = 15,S-'-11..
I Liquid limit - 2:>'1. b " \ ~ 40 ~. , t?l.O I Plastic limit = I 0
"'" / :: :
",,- I I Plasticity index I" = l,b C '3" II) r"-, I - YO.t) - 32-c:
"" I 0 , Fc-:-(J '2l1o 7 ... " f I I lc:;,~ C37iJo) II) "
c; 1\ 3: 3'-1 ," I
3"'2-10 I ""'" 15 20 25 30
. , 'KJ 50 60 80 100 .....
No. of blows. N.....,
Plastic Limit Determination
Can no. G,
wt. of wet soil + can 3'B,k, Wt. of dry soil + can 3b.b Wt. of can '2 <1 LL--, wt. of dry soil l,L{ wt. of moisture "2,D Water content. «:% = IV p CJ"O -
t.
i
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION Data Sheet 3
Project ____________ Job No. __ M_FZ_-_Z __ --=3_s_--_'-I_O ____ _ Location of Project _________ Boring No. ___ _ Sample No. ___ _
Description of Soil _________________________ _
Depth of Sample _____ _ Tested By --::.j~(\I' ______ _ Date _____ _
Liquid Limit Determillatio/l
Can no. / d -3 Wt. of wet soil + can Lf()·/ Lf5(o L/ I, 7 wt. of dry soil + can 3'&,q Y L '"L 3l,S Wt. of can ~8,~ ;)9,5 dB,;) wt. of dry soil "\. /O,b / /,7 9Jo Wt. of moisture \ 3.""2- 3,~ 3,'1 Water content. !c% \ 30A"'2.... 32,S 4 0 ,b
No. of blows. N \ L/7 33 2Y
1../(;) \
\ .~ )<,. , I
'.
~ 3~ 0
= \ I
\f C 3<-Q)
C
f\ I \
0 u 'u ~ Q)
I ,
1 \
iii ~ 3'-
I x I \
: 'lC :I.e) ~ 10 15 20 25 30 40 ,so 60 80 100
No. of blows. N
Plastic Limit Determinatioll
Can no. V- b -Wt. of wet soil + can LJ_D ,9 3s,y Wt. of dry soil + can 31,3 3LLI wt. of can Sl.b "2<{), I Wt. of dry soil rJ.( 6,0 wt. of moisture
" h --f,3
Water content, w% = tv" I 'B. c...{ -Z I,l
'i 45/6 40,Q JB,S l-z,i
'-1/1 ~'1.S
l(
Flow index F; = 2.<D, Liquid limit = 31 cO
Plastic limit = [JOe /.
Plasticity index II' = )fo.q
~3-~O = 2~ 'lSI ID3 flO
C.2 -- Direct Shear Test Data
HA-
OL/j2V£ N tJ/Z.fjflL /'7H£JJ )
A 0/' - 0:3 I ~/) II LfO IOC;.18 ---
8 01 1 - 103 15 11 '1-0 '11. /'1
C 01 I - ~ 3' 5/1 10 113,35' D 0/'-£'3 1!ill {:;o 7 to. to!
F 30! g {/ - 32. 1/ 0; ( 30 3l/. () () F 30 1211 - }2 1
/ Cj I Lf5' 11-3.50 G 3 t)' 2 1/ - 32 II q I (po 58.50 /-I 0,/ I - 0;Y 5° 80 to (p.
J ~/I (;. /2! A fI - j j (30 /:;5. / /
.,,---...,
UJ Cl..
'''-.-/
...c +-' 01 C Q) L
+-' (f)
L 0 Q)
...c (/)
100.00
50.00
0.00 ,
/tl7.1f3 P?!
'f3,H 1'5;
'7/.1'1 f7!
?6.bf
to,.~;2 P;>i
t5-.I/ /:'7:'
f..:.
j;'1;!..s r"
··~'3f15/
0.00
IE.
A
B
""8
*8
£
F ~G
c. ./i).
]>~
4"'~ d
fI. ..~ r@
Stress
l'1A-/2
\ <" -J~/Y
'J)/~ S-1~ lest- ,;?~~ /' . /1:(::0 '/ ~'>t;~ Ii, /clE~ " '
L{/j~ lC'7'~'>I"~ 1Io.f. 7;/I<!...A Pvc. :;( :tS~ SC4.f/e-v- .
c == / J r.5! l' = 320
".--~)-~ -~EP.7 -~~:;;~'(j
4= ST7<ONG
, L-1'1 == /"'IGre7 To f'fODER47£
i.........Q::, f'1 Ot~.=~7E: ____ _
-~ 0 q ~ 0
~ ~ 0 ~ ...... C\l
N) " Ii II
(j
0
*' ''1 0 d .~ ro
o o
~
a o d t(') C'J
o o o o l{)
o o ci o ..::t
o o . n
o o o o L[)
8 o o '<t
o o o ~
/\1D -/~
I/!: DEPTH N O~f1/JL
(
A 37 / 7 11 - 38 ( 5.3 I 83.'1 !
B q 7' 7" - 7,0 f ~ "/0 15.00 12, 110 C. Sif t5 11 _55 1
/11 30,00 110.30
5/ I 11/ -52 15 II 50.00 -:;1·00
'fo l to If - tfoll/" ::;0.00 105.:25" LJ zr 1/ II - tf 3 l!f II 13tf 100 jifO. q 0
Lf f '/o /1 - JL 5 (f II ;'19.00 ILf9.50
.i
o o o o N
o o
~
o o c:i Lf) N
8 x c:i r
o ~~ 0 ........ 00 NO
o "--'"
$ X q r
Vi ~ ~,
<::i ),.
" " 'i\ ~
<:\\ ~,-' ~,
"-
\..r-
~~
I"", C'j ,0 V1;
'" "
0 q 0 L[) f'I)
0 0 0 0 t<')
0 0 d l{') N
~
c: '-~
0 q~ 0 ...-0 0 N
0 . o ~
o X ~
o o c:i o '"
o o c:i Ii) ..--
0 0 .0 If) f"')
t I\"-<:S
"'" '- 0 0 ci 0 f"')
0 0
l!-! ~
.~
0 If) <'J
,............. C
"-..../ 0
ui~ q,.,.--.. 0 __
~O 0 . 0 "-.../
~ rJ ~ rJ 0 \) "-('\I • ,
~ ~ oJ" ...... '\l VJ
If) J\ ~ ~ "'t " (" ~ {\. \rI
;\
0 (' (' m (' \)J ;fI
C"- \)\ .;,1 ...') C"- . \ij ~ VI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'C;) ~ ~
'" 4 V
~ ~ ..9 ~ tI'I, .J r-l rl ...... . . ~
. If'.. ':<'I .... II) 'Il'-- <n ~ ~ ~ \0 \l-- ~ \? 'xl ~ ~ ~
~ \.I
0 IS' ~ ':Jl \' o{'I f' ~ \I"- .....
~ ~
~ '" 0,,) Il'- ~ :l' 0 ~, ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
;;:, N " ... ""-" I
~ ~ ~ )- f' ~ 0 t<' r \) (" ... ~ )'- , '" ....
~ f r' " ("' (\I N N t)') - ...... ...... ....
" ~ !. I) )0-f' -.)
~ ~ ('l\ '-..J ~
.... M ..... f\ \.,.. 0 Q
rJ . ,~
0 \!- ;;- rf\
ll.J ~ -.... ~ ;;t ;:t.. '-0 r ~ \J ~ en .,')
\) ,
~ ("I ...
~ . '-.3 N I.'" \t- V> c:<' .~ ~ \::)
. ~ \5 .
~ \;) C) '0 ~ () ()
(
~ i::
':)
~ N ('" i ~
rJ ~ -r
'-1l ~ \J"- o'=' ~ J. \l'" ::r --.... ~-J..
"'- l.o ~ r ~ :::r . ~
..: J'"' (' ('" \{\
I \' \'" ~ r- \(\
C"'I ~
r ~ (" ~ \ "if C"~ ....
~ ~ ""'"
~ '-i..
~ ~ l'l N'l t
., It- I:") ~
\....) ~ \J' ~ r c-I ~ 0 t'" ~
~ ~ C' ('(\ . \r)
"- '" ...: i- -...: " ();) .0 ';:)
~ ... "- ... ..... ~ t~ ... "- "'- '- Q. rV\ ~ "'- ~ ~ ..... "- -- .... .... = .,..
~ ........
~ "4. \l ~ -'v
'" ("
c-I ~ ..., ::l-
e) 't'" ~ (:\
(!) <::) ~ --l If" r:
.~ ~ ~ <::) - ~ ~
~ (:I c<' c-I r" M M
rt'
"' N t'I'I "- ... '-
"' "- ... "- "-....
y) .......... ~ ~
~ \':i
J -! ~ r- '" \' .s !'-I ~O r.::l ~ :::r 0 r '1';)1
~~ 0 C', \" ..q- N r- "'t V1 (j" ~ ~
. ......, \'(I
~ ;; ~ N C'\ ....:. \'" - rJ ~ ~ C- ~ '"
.... --- ()~ \3 "-'v -- "- ~
\ ,..."
"" tl' ..... rI'I
C.3 -- Triaxial Test Data
/3 ()
6
o II /
2.~ I
3
02
81
91
171
:z I-t
21
.-l <: 1--1
X <:
~ 01
> <:(j)
02
81
91
171
21
f<-<
x -< N 01
> (}) ,~
81
91
v1
z -21
01
91
171
21
<-1
,-... .-. ~
01 ,
> (f) .~
81
91
171
21
01
02
81
91
171
21
01
LOG OF TEST BORING No. MA-:I.
f..lo. D';;::PTI,,·! (+ t. )
1. :',? . 0 ~,;~ (b " 0 ::::; :l :I. " 0 4 :I. ~:S "
() ·· ... i ":r .. : ...... , I:::' d :'Z 1. " 0 6 :::~(~:) "
(1 "'7 ::~;() 0 ii· ::~; ..... .' " i3 :~:;~:5 u 0 I.} .1.1·(> . () .<'I·~.':i
1. 0 4:'5 " 0 :l :I. ::::.iO " 0 ::::;'7 :I. ~:~:': 1:::';:::-
, .. ,I, .. } " 0 :I.
'''('
-.::1 I.)() " 0
:I. ·4 (::>~:5 "
()
:I. ~:5 'l(> u ()
1- \~:I '7!75 .. 0
L.OG OF TEST BORING No.
BL.D~'J~3 ( 1\li::\ )
/' / :I. ~l~:: ::::~ ! :I. '74 / :l ~.':iO / Oi:i ;/ :I. '?E~ / '1
.1.
~)() / !5() ,Ii
~.5() ,I'
~.7;() ,i'
~:=.j() /'
~5() .,l
::5() / ~S(j ./ ~.:S() " .. ~:.iO i ..
:.~: · 0 ~I;':: · 0 :;:: · 0 !5 · ()
:':':: " 0 :~':'~ "
()
4 .. ()
,~) " 0
-4 " () 4 .. 0 ,"'j .l::. · 0 :,;;-:
" ~5
~:::i " 0 ::~;
" 0 ::::; .. ()
::~; .. 0
BL.Ol,\iE3 F;;'EF: 1:::'ODr ( f..1 )
7' ~,?~::~
]·4 B::::; Bf.3 )' f:3
:1. :I. (::) \ ... '
:I. 00 :I. ::?()
:I. ~5() :I. fJ'7 :,;::40 :1. 20 200 2()O ~,?()()
f.'" (t.~:;~:)
:I. :2:5 ::::;~:,;ci
:I. 0 1 Lj.
:l :l ~~:~ ::~~
:I. 1 E$2:; :I. 06:::; 1. ~75~:::~:.:j
:I. ~::':·:·:·:~5
:I. ~:.t~::5 fl :I. 900 ::~:: :~::; :1. :I. :?t:lEl4 :l ~::;~5D ~~:: l~. ~:5 ~~;
:;':~ .l(.!::.:,i::~:
:?,4~5:3:
LOG OF TEST BORING No. MA-4
1\10 • :Or::: I:::"r j .. 1 (+ t. )
.1. :;2 I' 0 ~:::: ()f! 0 ~:f" 1 J. (I ....• ,
4 :l ~::; II 0 r.:.:-d ::'::() A ''', \.,
!.~\ :::·:~~.::.i "
()
~7 :~:;() n 0 i:3 ::::; ~:.:.i "
()
9 ·<l() u 0 :;, () il·~':; " 0 1. 1- ~:t() II ", \",
:1. :;:':~ ~5{:::, " ()
:I. -:;' .... 1 t:, :1. " 0
1 4 {~)(:I It 0 :[ ~:5 '/() II 0 :I. \~:) "l~,:i " ()
1. '1 DO , 0 :l Ei i::$~5 II (>
:I. ('1 (;j)O "
()
:'~:':() (1~5 • () ~;,:: :I. :i. ()() " ()
4~;;:: .....
:~:; 1. ..... :::::::::;
2B ....
:OL.. U(!·JFi (N,,,d
(. / :!. :1. :I. .I :I. ;':';0 / ~.::.j() /'
I
~30 / I
~j() / ~5() / ~:5() /~
~50 / ~.:,i() / ~:5C} / (~) ~,~:: i :I. I
~5() / ~::;o ,/
I
~:=:.iO .l
~:5() / ~:;o / ~5() i
I
~50 ! ~:.:;O / ~.;.:.i() }
I
:I~': . 0 ~~':~ II 0 ~5 " 0 ~':':.i " 0 ~::5
" 0 ~,:i ., 0 ~::.;
" 0 ":!.
" 0 il· If 0 4 "
()
-4 " 0 :? " () ~5 II 0 ~~:.c " 0 .<"1-
" 0 !:~.i
" ~5
~5 " ~:;.:.i
~:.:.i II ()
~.::.i II 0 ~:.7.j
" 0 <:':>11 ()
D!.. .. [lv·J~::; F'Ei:::: FUO'r ( 1\1 )
6 :1. :1.
D7 :1. ~;,::O
:I. ()::~~ :1.2() 1. ::'~() :I. ~:.;() 1 06 .1. ()U
:1. ~5()
~:):2
LiB B(:~\
too 79
:I. 09 :I. :',~':~ ()
9~:.:.;
:l :;~() :I. 00
f.::. (t~";+)
:1. 0':1 :1. fl'?
:I. :I. '7 1 1 !::';~::;B 1. :::::49 :l ~.::.i~:5f:~
1 !.:5~5E~ 1 .. :;)()()
:I. ::::;1:.16 :1.4 :l c,?
:i. 900 ,:)67
1. 1 El::~; :I. :I. ~:::i(l
:I. :~:;~,~::!5
:l ()70
:l.4:'~;2
1 ;5~SB :t ::~:~ <!:; f.:)
1 :~~i~5i3 :I. ~~; ~,~~ ~=:5
LOG OF TESl BORING No.
No. DEPTH (ft.)
1 2 · 0 2 5 · 0 3 9 · 0 4 1 n
~ · 0 ~ ~ 3 1 · 0 6 35 · 0 7 4 1 · 0 R 55 · 0 9 60 · 0
1 0 65 · 0 1 1 69 · 0 1 1 2 80 · 0 1 3 85 · 0 1 4 90 " 0 1 5 95 · 0 1 6 1 00 · 0 1 7 1 05 · 0 1 8 1 1 0 u 0 1 9 1 1 5 · 0 20 1 20 · 0 2 1 1 25 · 0 22 1 30 · 0 23 1 35 · 0 24 1 40 " 0 25 1 45 · 0 26 1 50 " 0
BLOWS (Na)
1 1 / 1 25 / 1 50 / 50 / , 92 ; 1 /
50 ; /
50 I ~r ~~ I 50 / 50 / 00 / 50 j
50 / 50 /
I
50 / 50 /
I
50 I I
50 /
50 I I
50 ! 50 / 50 / 50 /
I
50 ! 50 ! 50 /
MA-I0
2 · 0 ~ ~ " 0 5 · 5 5 · 0 2 · 0 3 · 0 3 · 5 ~ ~ · 5 4 · 5 5 · 0 2 · 5 2 · 0 4 · 5 4 · 5 2 · 0 ~ ~ · 0 1 · 5 ~ 0 0 · 4 · 0 2 · 5 2 · 0 2 · 5 2 · 0 3 "
~ ~
~ 0 · 5 2 · 0
BLOWS PER FOOT (N)
1 1 25
1 09 1 20 92
200 1 7 i I
1 7 1 1 33 1 20 480 300 1 ~~ ~~
1 33 300 300 400 200 1 50 240 300 240 300 1 7 t
I ~
1 7 1 I
300
r (tsf)
1 87 387
1 432 1 558 1 23 1 2453 2 1 39 2 1 39 1 7
I 1 1 1 558 5337 35 1 6 1 7 1 1 I
1 7 1 1 35 1 b
35 1 A 4539 2453 1 900 2884 35 1 6 2884 35 1 6 2 1 39 2 1 39 35 1 6
LOG OF TEST BORING No.
Nc:;" :OE:P'TH (+ t ... :>
:t ~2 .. 0 :::'~ t.:. If () ":!' .... ' :l () .. () ·<lB -4 1- ~:.i .. ~:.) il· 1 1:::-cJ ~?() II ~.{ :~!;4
(:~ ~~:~5 fI
1:";' ,,,I 4:.:::
. .., ; :~::~ () u 0 :l. D :~:;l~.
" 0 ll{:'~)
? ~::; (:? II 0 :::::E\ .1. 0 44 .. 0 1. :I. .1·]·9 .. 0 1 ::'~ !5,(:j. " 0 -4 :1. ,.",
1 .. :!' ~:.::i c';> oJ () :I. .... ,
1 1.1· 6.11- . 0 4~:.i
:I. 1:::' \ .. J (::;<:? II () il·7 .....
1 L. I"' '74 . 0
LOG UF TEST BORING No ..
BI.."D!/·,1E' ( 1\li:~ :>
? / :l :~;::6 / :I. ~:50 l/
~.:.iO l /
~:;() I /
~50 , .. l
00 / ~::.i() / ~::;O ./'
~50 / !::iO / ~:.jO /
::~: II
:',~:: " ":r .... 1t1
~l;':': to
::::':11
:~~; tl
9 .. ~5 II
~.:5 Il
&l It
.:::: \ ... '" "!!' .... ' ..
00 ./ 10 .. ~:.iO i
l :~: 11
~:5() ,/" :I. " ;~.jO ./ ~;5 u
(l
0 0 ~5 ~.:.:i
0 0 0 0 ~5
0 0 (l
(>
~:7j
~::{
.Dl...Dt!,IG PEP r:'CiU'r (1\1)
c)i
~~':,~:')
:l.4fl 1 61 :1. ~:,:;iJ.
:t ·4:~:; :I. ":!"':r .... , .... ' :I. 06
flO 1- ::::; ::~~
:I. :,?()
:!. ·4 :l. :l :20 l (~)~5
:249 :I. 09
1
1
I~" ["
~::;l)
1.1·(> :t f:~'7'7
~;:':: () :? ~~; :l. ?4~.) .i. I:;):,::: :l :1. "7 :l. :I. 1 :2:;1:;>6 l :1. 13:::; :I.
._, :I. i
i .! .
:I. ~::j!:5E:i
1 'l9E~ :I. ~::.i!~:;B ~~:': ~) C? {:l :;::: <:.1D 0 1. t~.:::;:·~:
I,," ".
Triaxial Test Results - Baring No. MD-12
No.
1 2 ~ ~
4 ~ ~
b
DEPTH (ft.)
44 , 83 4 7 · 50 5 1 · 75 54 · 75 59 · 83 62 · 25
~l
(tsf)
1 543 1 250 1 496 1 700
982 1 ~ ~ 1 3
Ei - ihitial tanqent modulus Ep - chard modulus at peak E(5%) - chord modulus at 5% strain
~ ~p
(tsf)
1 250 1 1 77 1 26 1 1 233
786 1 1 33
E (5%) (tsf)
260 490 340 860 360 470
LOG OF TEST BORING Nc. MA-l
No.
:I.
DEP'rH .: + t. )
LOG OF TEST BORING No.
No.
1.
DEPT'H dt. )
0.0 .....
Cp (-t:t/!:iiE"'C)
11{~""'::~
Cp (+ t.'/ ~l;f:::C: ;i
ElOO
f" (k 8; i. )
E ( k~5:i. )
r" (t. 8+ )
b. U:sf)
LOG OF TEST BORING Nc.
1. 0 ,'~i
.,::, 4::::; ";I' . ~, t 06
"
" .
DI:::: F'"T' H (-ft.)
0 ." ..
B ..ow 1. :::~ ..... ~~:;
if·::::: " H ()l:) , n;;,
.... 1
1- El , P ,,:)
LOG OF TEST BORING Nc.
1 (I "
:~ Ei " ~.::: :;::~(?
"
DEPTH <+17.. )
(I ,,-
::~; ..... D.
:'~;c; II
~;:':': ..... ~I;:: :~:: () ~
~~::
::;:~
D
C:p (·f t . ./ ~::f':~C:: )
r'i 1- :~·::4· .l!:.
:::!;~~:; :::::(:'J
c) ~:-i ~:.:.i ()
/VI r~ ."" :1. 1
ep (+t/~50?C)
444 :~~::~;E58
::::;:3;(:) 1-
1"" ( k for,:[ )
B:,;;: ~'~~::'~ 7' '7BO
(kr,;;:l )
::::;
1.03 :'~::()!5
r (t:.5+>
~:.i(/Oi.l
:1. (:)::::;79 5f.:l~I;?()::·:·:
1"" (t. !sf )
2!:SB '74'70
1 479B
LOG OF TEST BORING No.
No.
1 0 · 2 7 · ~ ~ 31 ·
DEPTH (ft.)
0 -9 -
7 31
6 - 147
. 9
. 6 n 4
MD-12
Cp (ft!sec)
550 5557 8 1 28
(ksil
5 56 1
1201
1=' C
(tsf)
396 40453 86544
C.4 -- Consolidation Test Data
. . (::.'
.6 L:::: 0.001'7 II
A ff I", \ 1..00 p"S C-Afk"- ZI J,.,s
C:. .1 (:) 302 -, oot'? 21/1e.~
I II I Ii 303 - 32,'1
#2 II
:: I
K 1. := 2.2.- ,'0017 :: '2, /9~3
1/ = /..f- /0'2..
II -c (},I'i07
o . 14-07 - ,001'1
2-, 11~!
.r _ I H
't 100
J() ('2 (I _ 32 ( 7 If
('
1t/1"'7 2 ~bc> P S ~
.c.L =: a + 1'1r -= C;,O 7';;'- f
1 e = rJ. (!) '7., ~ - t!J, oo"} 7
2.110"3
,I
II o./(P'lt;;'"
= {),/6 c.fS - tJ,00t.f7
~.1'16'3
~I
(3- ..
I l 2/2.'1/£96 --~--------------------------------------- --------
.6. L = /~ +2- =
.0'2-&./2 - ,002.0
,()SV,-/ - .OO'l:O ---~---~,11 €,lo
1/ eJ.ozq.2.
)( /D 0 I
X rOO =:-
A L =- 6 + 1'1/
/,01 %
1/
II ./39 (
1-
.•.. i •.•. · --- q~-
i
1 ~-++--l-L I I I
9 - - fJntttttttntH#m~mJllLtljJJJl B - _~
- ....
sse -/'2
[()ff ~O;, #I-~ -;;~ f #--4
20 0 p-=- P S'.eJ-/-i /~
2, 1 "1 ~ 3 II
Al'l'f, 12-00 f'S~ LJ.L;. /-f 31
{;-::o .0'2.3/ - . Oa " )( /() (J :::
2,1~.$$
Afl'/~ '2-4()o j)S ~ tj.L ~ O.C:;'!!i<{2
C O·()~"Z - ,0011
;;:; y: OJ 0 = 2.11 g "3
4 Soo 1 st
- t1.602 tic, - o.()ot7
== 0.02.'3' ~
(), q? 1u
2,'3'1'%
4.01 ~
~*i-:::::::::t-: 2:J~'L ~~ -l" SF 'l--=>
~ ~::C;t--:~ --f~ =~
_~ =-:.: gJ~~"-~~--= ~~'§o=f_l~CC! =p.] =:-;::C~ =I~~ =~- ~--=-c:..
-~- -'=-:"=f-+ C=;=::::±-..::;:-
".?1:- -" -d~1"· .=::::-== ~:'7: = '''¥F -orcCf~_~,
-._'" =i'~ ~.~
--'c ·'C,',T.,--Hlll l·r\r>· 1..'('. \ \Cleo' z :: r;Cl" T, ,"f'1 r: ' , 1 1 ~ c.r::': '1', 't- 1 ,- t.:, d ,,"".11- <.-':11 i.C ! ......
~--;~~~8 -1~
==="-=='--g' -
~:;:-;.~§-,:-..:,:
,-:f~~- -c-"~. ~~ =-~
CONSOLIDATION TEST (Time-compression data) Data Sheet 15
Project _________________ _ Job No. _______________ __
Location of Project ________________ _ M t\-- II. .~ C Boring No. Sample No. __ ~f .... ~~
I Description of Soil _______________ _ Depth of Sample (P I - (.. 3· r
Tested By ________ ----------- Date of Testing _________ _
Loading Test Data
\ Load W ,',-P
Date applied --'?"",,-'-+-J ...J.1_1-'--__ _
Applied by _-l=""' __ i'\r,-I __ -=Cc,,-,-VV~l-,--
D i:~b'.v.,~ ~....,..,~\.c:. _ P<:<d ....... d toc..c.k. l:::.u O(c~ OC",-S.L~
(/2-. nr--Load __________ kPa
Date applied _--='2-+(....:,_-1"--__ _
Applied by
Clock *Dial readings x _____ time Elapsed
Clock Dial readings x ____ time Elapsed
and time. and time, I J-t '1 r.. date min Original Adjusted date min Original Adjusted
V~c) 0 II + '73. # 22-60 IV, 41 0 //+ <{(.. , 22<1 ~
0.1. fo 1\ 1-1') 1 '1 ~~5 0.1 /I, I S-0 ,Z,?S£:,
n 01:; IS . \ .... q<.- I! 0.25 Itt I)b .23'5b
·" "'';'
.......
c. CONSOLIDATION TEST (TIme-compression data) Data Sheet 15
project ___ S_~_C ____________ _ Job No. ____________________ _
Location of Project _________________ _ Boring No. M~~/2 Sample No. I c...
Depth of Sample & I - C. 1. r Description of Soil _____________ _
Tested By _--'-£---'-vt-'-I __ --->~"'---Wl----'------ Date of Testing ________ _
j),sfud-L/) '.LI't?-~LJ. Loading Test Data
\ T~F Load __ -'---'--____ kPa Load _---'=d~T_=:._r ___ kPa
Date applied -:L-=..J.I_"2<>-c-f--( 9",,"q.~ __ Date app lied _--=::e...'-il-'!2=--.;;..O __ _
Applied by _=6~VV' ___ _ C~ Applied by ______ _
Clock 'Dial readings x _____ time Elapsed
Clock Dial readings x ____ time Elapsed
and time. and time. date min Original Adjusted date min Original Adjusted
~1:+re I 0
/IfI'1/ 0.231/ I ~ ~ 0 0 1l.-flf3 o.'Z'::'f3
\ 0.1
12..11)' ,0. 'Z ~l S f
0.1 /2"1-181... o.'2..~Bz.
fI ?!; .. ~ .. ,.., '" a I ~ • .1 0.25 /? .f-t (u. D.t< 9("
c. CONSOLIDATION TEST (TIme-compression data) Data Sheet 15
Project ,>), L . Job No. ____________ __
Location of Project ______________ _ . /Wi12- 1'-Bonng No. Sample No. __ _
Description of Soil _____________ _ I
Depth of SamPle __ G_ 1_-__ &_?_ .. _(_--_
,r"' IA /I ,----j (M Tested By __ ""'L"-'-P_v' ___ ---'",,-'--'-------- Date of Testing ________ _
Loading Test Data
Load __ 4-'-1-U-=5_r __ kPa CrA~ -::: .q.:: Load _---'c9'---'r:_S'-'-~ __ kPa
Date applied _-,2=+)-,2::::.;O~ __ _ Date applied ______ _
Applied by _.;.=:6c...;VVl---'-___ _ Applied by ______ _
Clock "Dial readings x _____ time Elapsed
Clock Dial readings x ____ time Elapsed
and time. and time. date mir. Original Adjusted date min Original Adjusted
/'+S- 0 /2-1-/f1 ,2':>'11 2.~<t) 0
I~-I/~? .'2.'137
0.1 13+11) ,2-"'115 0.1 l'f-f ~ <- ,'l(M.pC)
n ,.,,,
o "" .- A If ....
3
CONSOLIDATION TEST (TIme-compression data) Data Sheet 15
c. Project __ ---t!S~s:...::c==---_________ _ Job No. _____________ __
Location of Project __ ...:.Mb.~:...;I(":...;l:.:::?»-p'___4::..::;-.'--------- M 1\-12-- I C-Boring No. Sample No. __ _
Description of Soil ________________________ _ Depth of Sample C, I - (,1. r I
Tested By ___________ -----------------_ Date of Testing __________ _
Loading Test Data
Load _-'!'-'G""--~..:._S_( __ kPa Load _-:~=-' _T--,--S_~ __ kPa
Date applied _'&~I...!:i:..:.~-+1...!:9:...:;Z?"'--- Date applied _-z~I-1.._"2..+)-~--~---Applied by __ &=-=--_~ ___ _ Applied by __ &lM..:::::...-.....:..--__ _
Clock "Dial readings x _____ time Elapsed
Clock Dial readings x ____ time Elapsed
and time. and time, date mir. Original Adjusted date min Original Adjusted
/2: z.o 0 14+£39 0,21,0 \ f~~?o 0 !S-f1<f 0,30'11..1
0.1 /5 "f(;,/ d, ,0& 1 0.1
15-+ €2.. O.'2;OSL
0.25 A
0.25 -4 C 6· C!>
CONSOLIDATION TEST (Time-compression data) Data Sheet 15
Project _________________ _ Job No. ______________ _
....... Location of Project _________________ _ Boring No. __ _ Sample No. __ _
Description of Soil _______________ _ Depth of Sample ________ _
Tested By _______ ------------ Date of Testing _________ __
Loading Test Data
4TsF U.u Load __ -'-_____ kPa I.A t-J Load __ 2_"'_·...:.'S..:.,1-___ kPa
. :.:' Date ap plied _2*=-1{!-''2'''-1--==+,--''~OL....3:'___ __ _ Date app I ied _"2--=-..... (*~'1-=-+(-"~>_...,_'_ __
Applied by _--,=G-~VV1,,-,--__ _ c.-~ Applied by _--==='---'-__ _
CloCk "Dial readings x lime Elapsed ----- Clock Dial readings x ____
time Elapsed and time. and time. date min Original Adjusted date min Original Adjusted
~'. 'Z.~ 0 /~ -f 6( eJ.30el 2:2r 0 1~~SI Cr. ~"r J
0.1 /~-+S '?> 0.30> '3. 0.1 I~~ll.. 0.;02..1.
" .... co - 0.25 Jr ..... # . ~ .... I
CONSOLIDATION TEST (TIme-compression data) Data Sheet 15
Project __________________ _ Job No. ____________________ __
..... ,. Location of Project __________________ _ Boring No. __ _ Sample No. __ _
Description of Soil ___________________ _ Depth of Sample _________ _
Tested By ___________________________ _ Date atTesting __________ _
Loading Test Data
p~ Load _-,/{-,1,-5;......1_::: ___ kPa f'~ Load __ 3=-'"-n_~_F __ kPa
Date applied ~ _________ _ Date applied ___________ _
Applied by ________ _ Applied by _______ _
Clock "Dial readings x time Elapsed ----- Clock Dial readings x ____
time Elapsed and time. and time, date min Original Adjusted date min Original Adjusted
4'DZ 0 15+/1 (), '301 456 0 15-fH (),3 0 If 1../
0.1 /5-1-1-0 O.~D'-(o 0.1
IS+~5 0·-30('''1
" "'" o ?'i J'~,_ ... .., .,,,....,,
CONSOLIDATION TEST (Time-compression data) Data Sheet 15
( ""
-:" .. Project _________________ _ Job No. ___________ _
Location of Project __ <._S'_c. _________ _ YlAA-I'L Boring No. Sample No. I C.
Description of Soil _____________ _ G (- G~.~ I Depth of Sample_-=-_-=-_..:...-__ _
Tested By ________________ _ Date of Testing ________ _
Loading Test Data
I&TSi-Load _______ kPa Load (Co 15 E kPa
;" .. Date applied 2 (n /8 S Date applied ______ _
Applied by __ &_Wl ___ _ Applied by ______ _
-Clock 'Dial readings x _____ time Elapsed
Clock Dial readings x ____ time Elapsed -
and time. and time, date min Original Adjusted date min Original Adj'_'Sled
5.'~o 0 IS-Vl3 (J,30 1 3 (;.'(){ ~ '20-{- eZ. {),4r:;9
0.1 !)'-f-~ I 6. ~Dcrl ~O3
0.1 20 -II/;<
o. tot 117~