add the logo of your institution here. goto -> view master sarma – sustainable aggregates...

Add the logo Of your institutionHere. Goto -> ViewMaster

SARMa – Sustainable Aggregates Resource Management

WP5 G.Tiess, M.Allaraj

Montan University of Leoben 28 June 2010, Budapest


Content of Presentation

• WP5-overview• WP5 –approach

– Theoretical aspects

– Practical aspects

• Work plan– Overview

– Details: WP 5.1 and WP 5.2

• Conclusion


Important issues of WP5

1. Creation of a SARMa-method and SSM-Policies

2. Implementation of transnational view of theoretical and practical outputs in SEE.

3. Know-how transfer through AIS integration and Regional Centre establishment of SARM and SSM,

– in order to achieve efficient implementation of SARM harmonized approaches,

• resource efficiency and long term cooperation in SEE countries.


Overview of WP 5 / Objectives

5.1 Legislation and policies harmonization on SARMCross-border case studies, AIS-design

5.2 Sustainable supply (SSM) among SEECross-border case studies, AIS-clarification

SARM and SSM Manual for national and transantional level 5.3.

Feasibility study and action plan for Regional Centre on SARM in SEE 5.4

S

A

R

M


Main objectives of SARMa- project

• Shifting to SARM and encouraging SSM policies.

• This requires the following: – a) to develop a common approach to SARM and – b) to ensure SSM planning at transnational, national, regional and local level in SEE.

• At a) includes scientifically and practical aspects – Regarding the term “common approach”: = general SARM system, i.e. a system providing

all relevant elements (based on the concept of sustainability).

• At b) implementing a) in SEE (transnational issue) based on appropriate methods.

– Need of defining the term “SARM and SSM”. (also the term ‘harmonization’)


Theoretical approach – SARM conception• To develop a common SARM approach we first need an optimized (idealized) SARM

system/concept. – SARM-model– set of various elements of such a system. – describing interrelations between these elements (‘supply conception’).

• determining the “elements/content” of SARM-model – broad or narrow concept?

• discuss the state of the art of a SARM-conception. – considering different “SEE aspects”, e.g. geographical aspects. – determine the main basics of SARM conception.

• E.g. fix geological knowledge in land use plans, to secure long-term access to deposits,

• recycling of aggregates. • If we able to determine a general SARM-model we also should be able to develop a method to

implement SSM policies (theoretical outputs).

• Furthermore SARM conception could be the basic for creating the AIS, applicable as a tool for know-how transfer in SEE.

• Again, first of all: Need of defining the term “SARM and SSM”.• - actually there is no definition in the Glossary


Theoretical approach

• SARM-model

– Discusing SARM-model, and its possible interrelations– Case studies of WP5 1.,2 shall be based on it

• Again: SARM-model could be also the basis for AIS

– Defining AIS– SEE Integration project: we need to create a tool that all can use.– The design of a model shall reflect the needs of SARM, specifically the components of

SSM.– Elements of AIS

• data, information, maps, legislation, practices, protocols, procedures etc.


SARM approach (model) -symplifiedInteractions between diff. elements


„content of conception?– comprehensive compilation of objectives, strategies and actions (region

and/or national level). – Time and resources plans (e.g. financial) have to determine at which

point which actions have to be taken.

Objectives Actions Time ResourcesSustainable supply of aggregates

Effective legal framework policy

Improve interactions between decision-makers and stakeholders

Optimal SSM Promote recycling

Access to land Land use planning, managementCo-operation between GS & Land use planning

….

SARM conception


PRACTICAL APPROACH

• Check the ‘state of the art’ SARM - conception in reality.• Using data collected from case studies according WP 5 and also information from

WP3, 4 .

• To make a comparison, or even evaluation with the theoretical SARM approach we need to define some indicators depending on the concept of sustainability. Based on such indicators the case studies can be conducted or at least “measured”

• Indicators for instance: – ‘fixed designated aggregates areas in land use plans for the mid- and long-

term horizon. – Transport distances in terms of economical aspects, CO2 etc: e.g. 30 km. ….– Recycling rates…

• …


PRACTICAL APPROACH

• Preliminary task: – discussing a theoretical SARM approach, i.e. SARM-model

• State of the art• theoretical output of the SARMa-project. • WP 5.1, 5.2 tasks shall based on it:

• WP 5.1 Harmonization of policy and legislation– WP 5.1 is focusing on SARM.

• Case studies• comparison of SARM-model can identify gaps; can also amend the theoretical approach. • However, this exercise should lead us to a common approach to SARM, which could be

acceptable or interesting for SEE at least on trans national level.

• WP 5.2 Securing Sustainable Supply across SEE– WP 5.2 is focusing on SSM.

• Case studies• Ensuring SSM planning at transnational, national, regional and local level • Depending on policy/legal framework

– implement SARM/SSM in SEE • appropriate methods necessary: • implement SARM “harmonized” in SEE, i.e.

– a transnational view of theoretical and practical outputs aiming at a secure supply of aggregates.


WP 5 - Work activities/Overview

• WP 5.1 Harmonization of policy and legislation

• Task 1: case studies– Transnational and cross border

• To get a transnational view (practical output). – case studies shall check SARM issues based on fixed ‘indicators’.– Identifying (comparison with the ‘model SARM’) gaps, conformity, or new

issues which could be included in the SARM model.

• Task2: recommendation on harmonization (transnational view) of policy/legislation and methods (administrative aspect) for incorporating SARM into land use plans and management. (Considering permitting procedures.)– recommendation based on analyses of case studies

• Task 3: design of structure and protocol for AIS (= knowledge tool, shall be applicable in SEE).


WP 5 - Work plan• WP 5.2 – Securing Sustainable Supply across SEE

– Task 1: case studies• Transnational and cross border • To get a transnational view (practical output). • case studies shall check SSM issues based on fixed ‘indicators’.

– Task 2: recommendation on harmonization of supply policies / legislation and methods for addressing SSM in land use planning and management

• recommendation based on analyses of case studies

– Task 3: clarifying contribution of AIS (existing information, interlinked) to SSM planning


WP5 Plan MatrixTask Who Deadline Notification

Prepare draft structure (model) of reports Nikos/Fotini 10 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Nikos/UrskaDetermination of case study locations for CB & TB Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Slobodan/Koletic, Mihai, Zach, Ubaldo, Moisiu/Simixhiu, Zriliç 10 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Nikos/Urska

3 Reports on crossborder(CB) case studies Nikos/Fotini, Mihai, Ubaldo 30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko - QMBAct.5.1 1 Report on transborder(TB) case study Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Slobodan/Koletic? 30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko - QMBIGME Prepare draft structure for synthesis report Nikos/Fotini 8 Dec. 8 Dec. Tiess/UrskaNikos Prepare synthesis report on harmonization Nikos/Fotini, Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Mihai, Ubaldo, Zach, 1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/Urska

1 Recommendation on SARM Task leaders: Nikos/Fotini, Tiess, Tamas, Mihai, Slavko, Ubaldo, Zach, Slobodan/Koletic ? 1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/Urska/SlavkoPrepare a draft of structure AIS Tiess, Nikos/Fotini, Slavko, Tamas, Ubaldo, Zach, Gian Andrea, Mihai, Moisiu+IT Group 15.Feb 21 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/IT Group/QMB

1 Service: structure&protocol for AIS design All partners of SARMa + IT Group 21 Feb. 15 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/Urska

Prepare draft structure (model) of reports Tiess 12 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Urska4 Reports on cross border case studies Nikos/Fotini, Eirini, Mihai, Ubaldo, Simixhiu/Moisiu?, Slobodan/Koletic?, Tamas, Zrilic (BiH)? 30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko/Urska

1 Report on transborder case study Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Slobodan/Koletic? 30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko/UrskaAct.5.2 Prepare draft structure for synthesis report Tiess 8 Dec. 8 Dec. Tiess/UrskaMUL Prepare synthesis report on SSM Tiess (TB), Nikos/Fotini (CB) 1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Urska/SlavkoTiess 1 Recommendation on SSM Task leaders: Tiess, Simixhiu/Moisiu?, Slobodan/Koletic?, Tamas, Slavko, Mihai, Zriliç 1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Urska/Slavko

Clarifying contribution of AIS to SSM planning All partners + IT Group May 2011 June/Slavko/Tiess/QMBUbaldo/Gian Andrea? --> Rimini, Italy 3-6 November 2010 (Transnational Workshop) 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 Urska

Nikos --> Edessa/Greece 5-8 April 2011 (4th Consortium Meeting) 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 Urska3 Study visits combined with transnational events Tiess --> St.Pölten, Austria 9-11 June 2011(Transnational Workshop) 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 Urska

Slavko --> Ljubljana, Slovenia 19-22 September 2011 (Final Consortium Meeting) 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 Urska

Act.5.3MUL Prepare a common manual on SARM&SSM Tiess/All SARMa partners May 2011 9-11 June (St.Pölten) Slavko/QMBTiess at regional, national and transnational levels 700 copies in English, 1500 in local languages

Act.5.4GeoZs Feasibility study Regional Centre on SARM&SSM Slavko/ All SARMa partners Aug.11 5 Sep.2011 Slavko/UrskaSlavko 1 Joint action plan for establishment of RC Slavko/ All SARMa partners Aug.11 5 Sep Slavko/Urska

Notes:3 Study visits will be in Edessa, St.Pölten and where (Rimini or Slovenia) ?3 Crossborder case studies for 5.1: GR-FRYM; RO-BG; IT-?1 Transborder case study for 5.1: AT-SI-HU-HR 4 Crossborder case tudies for 5.2: ALB, GR, BiH, RO1 Transborder case study for 5.2: AT-SI-HU-HRPlease note the DEADLINE of selecting the case study locations!!! That helps us to have a better idea of the issues we want to discuss in the report. 5.1 and 5.2 will aim to collect the most relevant information with regard to aggregates management and supply at TRANSNATIONAL LEVEL, harmonization of legal framework in border areas!!!The Activity Leader is responsible for the reports and to push the persons in charge for preparing them respecting deadlines!!!


WP5.1 Task 1 Cross-border case studies

Task Output Who Deadline Notification Review Confirmation

Prepare draft structure 1 Nikos, Tiess 10 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Nikos/Urska

13 Aug./Deborah 16 Aug. QMB

Determination of case study locations for CB & TB

4 Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Slobodan/Koletic, Mihai, Zach, Ubaldo, Moisiu/Simixhiu, Zriliç

10 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Nikos/Urska

13 Aug./Deborah/Slavko

16 Aug. QMB

Reports on case studies on SARM harmonization

Cross-border level

GR-FYRM, IT-AT, RO-BG

3 Reports Nikos, Mihai, Ubaldo 30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko - QMB

30 Dec.10/Slavko/Deborah

14 Jan.2011 QMB

Reports on case studies on SARM harmonization

Transnational level

AT-S-HU-HR

1 Report

Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Slobodan/Koletic ?

30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko - QMB


14 Jan.2011 QMB



Prepare draft strucure for synthesis report

1 Nikos, Tiess 8. Dez. 8 Dec. Tiess/Urska


15 Dec.10 QMB

Prepare sythesis report on SARM-harmonization

1 Nikos, Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Mihai, Ubaldo, Zach

1. Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/Urska

28.Feb.11/Slavko/Deborah

4 Mar. 2011 QMB

Recommendation on SARM

1 Task leaders: Nikos, Tiess, Tamas, Mihai, Slavko, Ubaldo, Zach, Slobodan/Koletic ?

1. Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/Urska/Slavko

28.Feb.11/QMB/Deborah

4 Mar. 2011 QMB

WP5.1 – Task 2 Recommendation on SARM in SEE

Proposals on harmonization of legislation/policies and methods for incorporating SARM into land use planning and management



Prepare a draft of structure

Nicos, Tiess, IT Group…

15 Feb.2011 21 Feb. 26 Feb.2011 7 Mar.11 QMB

Structure and protocol

1 Service IT Group + All partners of WP 5.1(suggestions and support with knowledge for AIS design)

21 Feb.2011 15 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/Urska

1 Mar.11/Slavko/Deborah

7 Mar. 11 QMB

Task 3 /WP 5.1 – Design AISDesign of structure and protocols for Aggregate Intelligence System


SARM- model



Prepare draft structure

Tiess 12 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Urska

13 Aug./Deborah 16 Aug. QMB

Determination of case study locations for CB & TB

12 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Urska

13 Aug./Deborah/Slavko

16 Aug. QMB

Reports on case studies on SSM

Cross-border level

GR-FYRM, IT-AT, RO-BG

4 Nikos, Eirini, Mihai, Ubaldo, Simixhiu/Moisiu?, Slobodan/Koletic?, Tamas, Zrilic (BiH)?

30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko/Urska


17 Jan.2011 QMB

Transnational level

AT-S-HU-HR

1 Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Slobodan/Koletic ?

30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko/Urska


17 Jan.2011 QMB

WP 5.2 – Task 1Case studies – SSM



Prepare draft strucure for synthesis report

Tiess 8 Dez. 10 Dec./Deborah 10 Dec.10/Slavko/Deborah

15 Dec.10 QMB

Prepare sythesis report on SARM-harmonization

1 Tiess (TB), Nikos (CB)

1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Urska/Slavko

28.Feb.11/Slavko/Deborah

4 Mar.2011 QMB

Recommendation on SARM

1 Task leaders: Tiess, Simixhiu/Moisiu?, Slobodan/Koletic?, Tamas, Slavko,

Mihai, Zriliç

1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Urska/Slavko

28.Feb.11/Deborah/QMB

4 Mar.2011 QMB

WP 5.2: TASK 2

Proposals on harmonization of supply policies / legislation and methods for addressing SSM in land use planning and management



Clarify contributions

All partners May 2011 June Slavko/QMB

Slavko/Deborah/QMB End of June/ QMB

Clarifying contributions of AIS to SSM planning

WP 5.2: Securing supply in SEE – TASK 3


WP 5.3 - Preparation of manual for national and transnational level

WP 5.4 - Follow-up activities: Regional CentreTask Who Deadline Notification

Prepare draft structure (model) of reports Nikos/Fotini 10 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Nikos/UrskaDetermination of case study locations for CB & TB Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Slobodan/Koletic, Mihai, Zach, Ubaldo, Moisiu/Simixhiu, Zriliç 10 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Nikos/Urska

3 Reports on crossborder(CB) case studies Nikos/Fotini, Mihai, Ubaldo 30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko - QMBAct.5.1 1 Report on transborder(TB) case study Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Slobodan/Koletic? 30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko - QMBIGME Prepare draft structure for synthesis report Nikos/Fotini 8 Dec. 8 Dec. Tiess/UrskaNikos Prepare synthesis report on harmonization Nikos/Fotini, Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Mihai, Ubaldo, Zach, 1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/Urska

1 Recommendation on SARM Task leaders: Nikos/Fotini, Tiess, Tamas, Mihai, Slavko, Ubaldo, Zach, Slobodan/Koletic ? 1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/Urska/SlavkoPrepare a draft of structure AIS Tiess, Nikos/Fotini, Slavko, Tamas, Ubaldo, Zach, Gian Andrea, Mihai, Moisiu+IT Group 15.Feb 21 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/IT Group/QMB

1 Service: structure&protocol for AIS design All partners of SARMa + IT Group 21 Feb. 15 Feb. Tiess/Nikos/Urska

Prepare draft structure (model) of reports Tiess 12 Aug. 10 Aug. Tiess/Slavko/Urska4 Reports on cross border case studies Nikos/Fotini, Eirini, Mihai, Ubaldo, Simixhiu/Moisiu?, Slobodan/Koletic?, Tamas, Zrilic (BiH)? 30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko/Urska

1 Report on transborder case study Tiess, Slavko, Tamas, Slobodan/Koletic? 30 Nov. 30 Nov. Tiess/Slavko/UrskaAct.5.2 Prepare draft structure for synthesis report Tiess 8 Dec. 8 Dec. Tiess/UrskaMUL Prepare synthesis report on SSM Tiess (TB), Nikos/Fotini (CB) 1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Urska/SlavkoTiess 1 Recommendation on SSM Task leaders: Tiess, Simixhiu/Moisiu?, Slobodan/Koletic?, Tamas, Slavko, Mihai, Zriliç 1 Feb. 1 Feb. Tiess/Urska/Slavko

Clarifying contribution of AIS to SSM planning All partners + IT Group May 2011 June/Slavko/Tiess/QMBUbaldo/Gian Andrea? --> Rimini, Italy 3-6 November 2010 (Transnational Workshop) 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 Urska

Nikos --> Edessa/Greece 5-8 April 2011 (4th Consortium Meeting) 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 Urska3 Study visits combined with transnational events Tiess --> St.Pölten, Austria 9-11 June 2011(Transnational Workshop) 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 Urska

Slavko --> Ljubljana, Slovenia 19-22 September 2011 (Final Consortium Meeting) 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 1 Sep.10 - 30Sep.11 Urska

Act.5.3MUL Prepare a common manual on SARM&SSM Tiess/All SARMa partners May 2011 9-11 June (St.Pölten) Slavko/QMBTiess at regional, national and transnational levels 700 copies in English, 1500 in local languages

Act.5.4GeoZs Feasibility study Regional Centre on SARM&SSM Slavko/ All SARMa partners Aug.11 5 Sep.2011 Slavko/UrskaSlavko 1 Joint action plan for establishment of RC Slavko/ All SARMa partners Aug.11 5 Sep Slavko/Urska

Notes:3 Study visits will be in Edessa, St.Pölten and where (Rimini or Slovenia) ?3 Crossborder case studies for 5.1: GR-FRYM; RO-BG; IT-?1 Transborder case study for 5.1: AT-SI-HU-HR 4 Crossborder case tudies for 5.2: ALB, GR, BiH, RO1 Transborder case study for 5.2: AT-SI-HU-HRPlease note the DEADLINE of selecting the case study locations!!! That helps us to have a better idea of the issues we want to discuss in the report. 5.1 and 5.2 will aim to collect the most relevant information with regard to aggregates management and supply at TRANSNATIONAL LEVEL, harmonization of legal framework in border areas!!!The Activity Leader is responsible for the reports and to push the persons in charge for preparing them respecting deadlines!!!


WP5 SEE TRANSNATIONAL LEVEL ACTIVITIES

5.1IGME

Harmonization of legislation and policies1 Synthesis report on activity 5.1 (O9)1 Recommendations on the transnational level for decision-makers on SARM (O10)1 Service: structure and protocol for AIS (data, information, maps, legislation, protocols, etc.) as infrastructural ground for regional centre (O19)4 Reports on case studies on harmonization: transborder AT-SI-HU-HR; 3X crossborder: GR-FYRM; RO-BG; IT - AT, FR(O1a)

5.2MUL

Sustainable supply across SEE regions or countries1 Synthesis report on activity 5.2 (O9)3 Study visits combined with transnational events (30 persons per visit) (O8)1 Recommendations on the transnational level for decision-makers on SSM (O10)5 Reports on case studies on sustainable supply: transborder AT-SI-HU-HR; 4X crossborder: ALB, GR, BIH, RO (O1a)

5.3MUL

Preparation of a common manual on sustainable aggregates resource management and supply mix on regional, national and transnational level1 Manual on SARM and SSM at regional, national and transnational levels - 2200 copies: 700 copies in English (30 per partner and 280 for LP) and 1.500 in local languages (100 per partner) (O4)

5.4GeoZS

Sustainable aggregates supply follow-up activities: setting the ground for a regional centre for sustainable aggregates supply1 Feasibility study for the Regional Centre on SARM and SSM (O9)1 Joint action plan for establishment of the Regional Centre on SARM and SSM (O12)

WP/ activity WP/ activity

Duration: year/ months red line: reporting periods

2009 (may - dec) 2010 (jan - dec) 2011 (jan - oct)

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30


SARMa outputs from Application Form

5.1 IGME– 4 Reports(1xTB+3xCB) on case studies on harmonization– 1 Synthesis Report on SARM– 1 Recommendation on SARM– 1 Service (structure& protocol for AIS)

5.2 MUL– 5 Reports(4xCB + 1xTB) on case studies on SS across SEE– 1 Synthesis Report on SSM– 1 Recommendation on SSM– 3 Study visits (combined with transnational events)

5.3 MUL– 1 Manual on SARM & SSM (regional, national& transnational level)

5.4 GeoZS– 1 Feasibility Study for the Regional Centre on SARM&SSM– 1 Joint Action Plan for establishment of RC


• Define the most specific areas for TB (transborder)&CB(cross-border) case studies– Define the expectations of TB&CB studies

– What is general and what specific in the study areas?

– Do the partners consider boarder effects in SARM?

• All partners must give their input in designing AIS– While compiling a structure report for case studies, take into consideration AIS

• Key words of WP5 to keep in mind before preparing a report or meeting authorities & companies‘ representatives:

– SARM and SSM• Harmonization

– Legislation, Policies

– Land use planning, Management

– AIS, Regional Centre

– Sustainable supply

How to achieve these outputs?


How to succeed? Transparent communication

Respecting the deadlines/activity leader

If not possible, inform the LP, ALIANTA, WPL&AL: at least 10 days before the deadline

Cooperation, support and internal communication/know-how transfer between all partners


www.unileoben.ac.at

Thank you for your attention!

add the logo of your institution here. goto -> view master sarma – sustainable aggregates...

Documents