adapt thrombectomy in ica terminus to mca: does the

1
ADAPT Thrombectomy in ICA Terminus to MCA: Does the Location of Thrombus and Vessel Diameter Matter? Joseph Brazzo III; Jeffrey Beecher; Antoni Szeglowski; Anthony Yan; Vernard Fennell; Hussain Shallwani; Hakeem Shakir; Gursant Atwal; Elad Levy; Adnan Siddiqui Introduction Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with stentrievers as well as aspiration have been demonstrated to be efficacious in stroke rescue. Currently, there are several trials comparing a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) to stentriever analyzing first pass success rates. Anatomic variations from patient to patient may play a significant role in success of one technique over another. In this study we define successful ADAPT as achieving revascularization after a single thrombectomy pass, and unsuccessful ADAPT requiring subsequent passes. Three anatomic variables were assessed and their relationship to a successful ADAPT was analyzed. 1) Difference in vessel lumen diameter and inner diameter (ID) of aspiration catheter at the clot interface 2) Distance of clot from the internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation a) Absolute Distance b) Categorization of clot distance as being in the proximal half or distal half of the MCA defined as M1a and M1b, respectively 3) The angle made by the ICA bifurcation between the distal ICA and M1 segment of the MCA Ultimately, the purpose of this study was to identify the optimal anatomic variables for ADAPT success. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our stroke database from January 2012 to June 2017 for all M1 segment MCA thrombotic occlusions that utilized ADAPT for mechanical thrombectomy. Patients were included if they were treated with ADAPT and had an isolated M1 occlusion. Exclusion Criteria: - Cases were excluded if they had simultaneous tandem occlusions or pseudoocclusions proximal to the MCA - ICA terminus, M2, or more distal occlusions The pre-retrieval angiogram was used to calculate the vessel lumen diameter at the thrombus interface, and the distance from the ICA-T to the thrombus. The post- retrieval angiogram was used to calculate the absolute distance of the M1 segment (from ICA bifurcation to MCA bifurcation), and to determine if the thrombus was located in the M1a segment (first half of the M1) or M1b (second half of the M1). The vessel diameter was then compared to the ID of the aspiration catheter used in clot retrieval. Measurements were collected separately by two authors for each patient who were blinded to the success of ADAPT. Investigators took 2 calculations for each continuous variable measurement, which were averaged for a single weighted measurement used for analysis (Image 1). We analyzed our results focusing on number of passes (1 pass vs. 2 or more) vs. difference of vessel lumen diameter and ID of the catheter, distance of clot from ICA -T, and the angle of the distal ICA and M1 segment. Furthermore, the recanalization thrombolysis in cerebral infarcation (TICI) perfusion scale (2b and greater or less than 2b) was utlized to evaluate ADAPT success as well. Statistics: Student t-test was used for continuous dependent variables (one- and two-tailed) Fisher Exact test was used for categorical dependent variables (one-tailed) Results A total of 32 cases were included in our study after meeting exclusion/inclusion criteria, with 19 requiring ADAPT only (group 1), and 13 requiring 2 or more passes after ADAPT (group 2). Furthermore, our study included 20 females and 12 males; 18 right-sided occlusions and 14 left-sided occlusions. At the 0.05 alpha level, none of our variables were statistically significant (Figures 1 & 2); however, it should be noted that there were strong trends among ADAPT success and smaller difference in vessel diameter and catheter ID (p=0.126), and larger distance to clot from ICA-T (p=0.172); with the strongest trend being a smaller or more acute angle between the ICA-T and MCA (p=0.105). Weaker trends could be found between ADAPT success and clot being in M1b (p=0.2776), and longer M1 length (p=0.243). There was no trend or difference in ADAPT success and revascularization outcomes (TICI score) (p=0.6552). Image 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Conclusion Our data demonstrates a trend towards increased success with ADAPT as the difference between the vessel diameter and ID of the aspiration catheter decreases. Interestingly, vessel diameter alone had no significant association with ADAPT success. Furthermore, there is a similarly strong trend of a longer distance to occlusion in the M1 segment with ADAPT success; and weaker trend of a longer M1 segment of the MCA in those with the success of ADAPT. Similarly, a strong trend exists between first pass recanalization with ADAPT and M1b thrombi, a surrogate for clot distance and vessel diameter. To our surprise we also found ADAPT success to have the strongest trend with a more acute or smaller angle of the ICA-T and MCA, for reasons unknown. Taken collectively, although our results prove to be statistically insignificant at the 0.05 alpha level, limitations must be considered. These include a small statistical power as defined by our small number of cases included in the study; as well as investigators not experts in radiographic measurements. We believe with a larger sample size and expert measurements, it can be shown that the use of ADAPT is ideal for clots in the distal M1 segment of the MCA assuming use of an appropriate aspiration catheter ID. Learning Objectives ADAPT is a well-studied, proven technique for mechanical thrombectomy Patient specific anatomic variations may effect the success of mechanical thrombectomy ADAPT success increases as the vessel diameter decreases for M1 occlusions References Spiotta AM, Chaudry MI, Hui FK, et al. Evolution of thrombectomy approaches and devices for acute stroke: a technical review. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:2–7 Mocco J, Fiorella D, Fargen KM, et al. Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke is indicated and evidence based: a position statement. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:79–81. Vargas J, Spiotta A, Fargen K, et al. Long term experience using the ADAPT technique for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg doi:10.1136/neurintsurg- 2015-012211 Turk AS, Frei D, Fiorella D, et al. ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:260–4.

Upload: others

Post on 14-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ADAPT Thrombectomy in ICA Terminus to MCA: Does the

ADAPT Thrombectomy in ICA Terminus to MCA: Does the Location of Thrombus and Vessel Diameter

Matter?Joseph Brazzo III; Jeffrey Beecher; Antoni Szeglowski; Anthony Yan; Vernard Fennell; Hussain Shallwani; Hakeem Shakir;

Gursant Atwal; Elad Levy; Adnan Siddiqui

IntroductionMechanical thrombectomy (MT) withstentrievers as well as aspiration havebeen demonstrated to be efficacious instroke rescue. Currently, there are severaltrials comparing a direct aspiration firstpass technique (ADAPT) to stentrieveranalyzing first pass success rates.Anatomic variations from patient to patientmay play a significant role in success ofone technique over another. In this studywe define successful ADAPT as achievingrevascularization after a singlethrombectomy pass, and unsuccessfulADAPT requiring subsequent passes.Three anatomic variables were assessedand their relationship to a successfulADAPT was analyzed.1) Difference in vessel lumen diameter andinner diameter (ID) of aspiration catheter atthe clot interface2) Distance of clot from the internal carotidartery (ICA) bifurcation a) Absolute Distance b) Categorization of clot distance asbeing in the proximal half or distal half ofthe MCA defined as M1a and M1b,respectively3) The angle made by the ICA bifurcationbetween the distal ICA and M1 segment ofthe MCAUltimately, the purpose of this study was toidentify the optimal anatomic variables forADAPT success.

MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed our strokedatabase from January 2012 to June 2017for all M1 segment MCA thromboticocclusions that utilized ADAPT formechanical thrombectomy. Patients wereincluded if they were treated with ADAPTand had an isolated M1 occlusion.Exclusion Criteria:- Cases were excluded if they hadsimultaneous tandem occlusions orpseudoocclusions proximal to the MCA- ICA terminus, M2, or more distalocclusionsThe pre-retrieval angiogram was used tocalculate the vessel lumen diameter at thethrombus interface, and the distance fromthe ICA-T to the thrombus. The post-retrieval angiogram was used to calculatethe absolute distance of the M1 segment(from ICA bifurcation to MCA bifurcation),and to determine if the thrombus waslocated in the M1a segment (first half of theM1) or M1b (second half of the M1). Thevessel diameter was then compared to theID of the aspiration catheter used in clotretrieval.Measurements were collected separatelyby two authors for each patient who wereblinded to the success of ADAPT.Investigators took 2 calculations for eachcontinuous variable measurement, whichwere averaged for a single weightedmeasurement used for analysis (Image 1).We analyzed our results focusing onnumber of passes (1 pass vs. 2 or more)vs. difference of vessel lumen diameter andID of the catheter, distance of clot from ICA-T, and the angle of the distal ICA and M1segment. Furthermore, the recanalizationthrombolysis in cerebral infarcation (TICI)perfusion scale (2b and greater or less than2b) was utlized to evaluate ADAPTsuccess as well.Statistics:Student t-test was used for continuousdependent variables (one- and two-tailed)Fisher Exact test was used for categoricaldependent variables (one-tailed)

Results

A total of 32 cases were included inour study after meetingexclusion/inclusion criteria, with 19requiring ADAPT only (group 1), and13 requiring 2 or more passes afterADAPT (group 2). Furthermore, ourstudy included 20 females and 12males; 18 right-sided occlusions and14 left-sided occlusions.

At the 0.05 alpha level, none of ourvariables were statistically significant(Figures 1 & 2); however, it should benoted that there were strong trends amongADAPT success and smaller difference invessel diameter and catheter ID (p=0.126),and larger distance to clot from ICA-T(p=0.172); with the strongest trend being asmaller or more acute angle between theICA-T and MCA (p=0.105). Weaker trendscould be found between ADAPT successand clot being in M1b (p=0.2776), andlonger M1 length (p=0.243). There was notrend or difference in ADAPT success andrevascularization outcomes (TICI score)(p=0.6552).

Image 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrates a trend towardsincreased success with ADAPT as thedifference between the vessel diameterand ID of the aspiration catheterdecreases. Interestingly, vessel diameteralone had no significant association withADAPT success. Furthermore, there is asimilarly strong trend of a longer distanceto occlusion in the M1 segment withADAPT success; and weaker trend of alonger M1 segment of the MCA in thosewith the success of ADAPT. Similarly, astrong trend exists between first passrecanalization with ADAPT and M1bthrombi, a surrogate for clot distance andvessel diameter. To our surprise we alsofound ADAPT success to have thestrongest trend with a more acute orsmaller angle of the ICA-T and MCA, forreasons unknown. Taken collectively,although our results prove to be statisticallyinsignificant at the 0.05 alpha level,limitations must be considered. Theseinclude a small statistical power as definedby our small number of cases included inthe study; as well as investigators notexperts in radiographic measurements. Webelieve with a larger sample size andexpert measurements, it can be shown thatthe use of ADAPT is ideal for clots in thedistal M1 segment of the MCA assuminguse of an appropriate aspiration catheterID.

Learning ObjectivesADAPT is a well-studied, proventechnique for mechanicalthrombectomy

Patient specific anatomic variationsmay effect the success of mechanicalthrombectomy

ADAPT success increases as thevessel diameter decreases for M1occlusions

ReferencesSpiotta AM, Chaudry MI, Hui FK, et al.Evolution of thrombectomy approaches anddevices for acute stroke: a technical review.J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:2–7

Mocco J, Fiorella D, Fargen KM, et al.Endovascular therapy for acute ischemicstroke is indicated and evidence based: aposition statement. J Neurointerv Surg2015;7:79–81.

Vargas J, Spiotta A, Fargen K, et al. Longterm experience using the ADAPT techniquefor the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. JNeurointerv Surg doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012211

Turk AS, Frei D, Fiorella D, et al. ADAPTFAST study: a direct aspiration first passtechnique for acute stroke thrombectomy. JNeurointerv Surg 2014;6:260–4.