adam jacholkowski catania & cern 1 24-25/01/05 gsi silicon tracking at wa97 and na57...
TRANSCRIPT
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 1
24-25/01/05 GSI
Silicon Tracking at WA97 and NA57
• introduction to WA97/NA57 : setup & physics
• silicon pixels – hardware aspects • alignment• pattern recognition & track fit• vertex finding
• summary & final remarks
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 2
24-25/01/05 GSI
The NA57 Experiment
Study of the dependence of hyperon enhancements on:
WA97 p-Be sample used as reference data at 158 A GeV.
Data samples:
• Interaction volume - centrality down to Nwound ~ 50• Collision energy - data at two beam momenta - 158 and 40 A GeV/c
INTRODUCTION(1)
3-4 Tb in CASTOR (mass storage)
System Beam energy Sample size Data taking year
Pb-Pb 158 A GeV 230+230 x 106 evts 1998+2000
Pb-Pb 40 A GeV 240 x 106 evts 1999
p-Be* 40 A GeV 60+110 x 106 evts 1999+2001
(continuation and extension of WA97)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 3
24-25/01/05 GSI
INTRODUCTION
Example:
INCREASES WITHSTRANGENESSCONTENT !
systematic error
NA57 – example of the enhancement study
result: for more see G. Bruno plenary talk at QM2004
Bepwound
cent
PbPbwound
cent
NY
NY
Enhanc
.
INTRODUCTION(2)
Enhancement def.
central rapidity
(one unit) yield
statistical error
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 4
24-25/01/05 GSI
WA97 (predecessor of NA57) set-up in the OMEGA magnet
Target: Be, Pb; Beam: p, Pb, 158 A GeV/c
momentum Magnetic field: 1.8 T Silicon telescope: tracking
device (7 pixel and 10 microstrip planes, 5cm x 5cm)
Pad chambers: lever arm Scintillation petals: lead run
centrality trigger (40% inel)
Multiplicity detectors: off-line event centrality analysis
d
L
L = 30 cmd = 60 cm (Pb-Pb), 90 cm (p-A) = 40 mrad (Pb-Pb), 48 mrad (p-A)
(~ 0.5 M pixels)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 5
24-25/01/05 GSI
B=0 event
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 6
24-25/01/05 GSI
NA57 SETUP (Pb - Pb run)
1.4 T
Target: 1% Pb
Scintillator
Petals: centrality trigger
MSD: multiplicity silicon detector
Tracking device:
silicon pixel planes
(5 x 5 cm2 cross section)
Lever arm: double side strips
5 cm X
(~ 1.0 M pixels)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 7
24-25/01/05 GSI
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 8
24-25/01/05 GSI
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 9
24-25/01/05 GSI
Ω3 pixel (single) card
Ω2 pixel plane (box)
5 cm
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 10
24-25/01/05 GSI
Single pixel cell of the LHC1/Ω3 chip
LHC1: A semiconductor pixel detector readout chip with internal,
tunable delay providing a binary pattern of selected events
Erik H. M. Heijne et al
Nucl. Instr. & Methods A 383 (1996) 55
( RD19 & WA97 collaboration)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 11
24-25/01/05 GSI
Pixel Maps (full planes) 1
as seen by the
beam (along X)
(98256 pixel cells)Z
Y
Ω3Y
double length
pixels
(chip border)
10 000 events
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 12
24-25/01/05 GSI
Pixel Maps (full planes) 2
(73656 pixel cells)
only one card switched ON
Ω2Z
10 000 events
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 13
24-25/01/05 GSI
Dead Time (1)
LDC – Local
Data Collector(group of pixel cards)
ms
DT – proportional to amount of fired pixels (hits + noise)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 14
24-25/01/05 GSI
Dead Time (2)
Risk of saturating DAQ
in case of high level of noise, but
exaggerated noise suppression
lowering planes efficiency
compromise
Importance of masking
noisy pixels and (chips)
efficiency monitoring
Data Base
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 15
24-25/01/05 GSI
MAIN ANALYSIS STEPS
• ALIGNMENT and CALIBRATION DATA BASE
• GEOMETRICAL RECONSTRUCTION clusters, tracks• V0 FINDING Λ and K0 candidates
• CASCADE RECONSTRUCTION (V0s + tracks) • PARTICLE SIGNALS EXTRACTION (selection cuts) Gold-Plated ntuples• CORRECTING for ACCEPTANCE and LOSSES EVENT-BY- EVENT WEIGHTING (and/or de-convolution)
• EXTRAPOLATION TO FULL Pt AND ONE UNIT OF rapidity• NORMALIZATION (beam flux,target) YIELDS• MULTIPLICITY RECONSTRUCTION CENTRALITY
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 16
24-25/01/05 GSI
ALIGNMENT(1)
Starting point – optical bench survey measurements + internal pixel ladder positions (known from construction)
Internal pixel alignment cross checks using strips tracks (WA97) and exploiting ladder overlaps
Transverse & longitudinal alignment using straight tracks (special B=0 and telescope in proton beam runs)
Small correction tilt angles relative to the telescope axis Cross-alignment of the Z and Y planes Alignment data taken periodically and/or after each
intervention on the optical bench ( results stored in the DB)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 17
24-25/01/05 GSI
Alignment (2)
Single Y (vertical) ladder Y-plane tilt test
mm
Z
Z
Y
mic
rons
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 18
24-25/01/05 GSI
Parabolic Approximation (used in Pat. Rec.)
310
circle
parabcircle
y
yy
xtgzz
xxtgyy
0
20 2
1
circle
parabola
Y
X
31 cm
Example:
p = 2 GeV/c
φ = 0.
ρ = 5m
cmy
cmy
parab
circle
000.1
,001.1
Sagitta = L2 /8ρ= ¼ cm
(50 pixels)
10 μ diff.
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 19
24-25/01/05 GSI
Polynomial Parameterization
Fit (example)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 20
24-25/01/05 GSI
TRACK RECONSTRUCTION PRECISION
measNpts
pts
measNpts p
Np
XpK
termsdiagonalnon
LK
L
LKL
pL
K
LBp
322
0
3
2
2
2
202
22
202
22
4
2
4
20
22
)/1(4
7)/1(
10015.0
,
cos6
1
)cos(
26
3
1
)cos(
26
tan
cos3
4
)cos(
96
0003.0
cos)/1(
(3 points parabolic approximation)
B in kGs, p in GeV/c, L in cm
σ0 = pitch/sqrt(12)
R.L. GLUCKSTERN
Nucl. Instr. & Methods 24(1963) 381
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 21
24-25/01/05 GSI
NA57 case : λ ≈ 0, L ≈ 30cm, B ≈ 14kGs,X0 ≈ 30cm/(9x 0.012) = 277cm, pitch = 50μm
)/(0.2)(,25.0)(
/045.0)/(,0037.0)/(6
126
3
496
)0003.0(
1)/1(
22
202
2
4
20
22
pmradmrad
ppppp
LKL
L
K
LBp
mscmeas
mscmeas
Δp/p meas and msc errors equal at p ≈ 12.2 GeV/c (4.5%)
p = 12.2 Δφ = 0.25 & 0.17mrad → 0.3 mrad
meas msc.
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 22
24-25/01/05 GSI
Pattern Recognition(1)
Parabolic track model (very good approximation!) in the bending plane
Starting from 3 points (e.g. in the first and the last plane + in one of the intermediate planes) then adding other points lying within the predetermined limits relatively to the predictions
Constraints: Npoints ≥ Nmin (for example 6-7 out of 9-11 possible) with a requirement of a minimum number of points in each type of pixels (Z or Y-like)
Semi-combinatorial,
using predefined plane configurations of the compact part only
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 23
24-25/01/05 GSI
-)
Pattern Recognition(2)
xx
x
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 24
24-25/01/05 GSI
Pattern Recognition (3)
2D - PR+ matching in WA97, 3D - PR in NA57 Hit sharing level controlled according to the chosen
tolerance: ambiguities resolved on the basis of χ2
Track finding efficiency bigger than 95%, while Kalman Filter ε ≈ 50% ! ( sparse points + multiple scattering)
Ghosts kept at a negligible level (below 1% ) PR optimization - multiplicity dependent (different in
Pb-Pb and p-Be)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 25
24-25/01/05 GSI
Track Fit(Quintic Spline)
pzydx
dzz
dx
dyy
zBzyByBzypz
yBzyBzBzypy
yzx
zyx
/1,tan,tan,,
,
)1()1(
)1()1(
00
''
2''''2/12'2'''
2'''2/12'2'''
H. Wind
Nucl. Instr. & Methods 115 (1974) 431
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 26
24-25/01/05 GSI
ORHION – reconstruction programme
Fortran code developed under Patchy: new versions kept backward compatible (useful for reprocessing !)
Working both on real and simulated (GEANT MC) data Internally split into different (main) sub processes: OR – steering ST – pattern recognition
TF – track fit XC – lever arm track improvement
V0 – secondary vertices finder DST-output files of different formats input for the
analysis programs
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 27
24-25/01/05 GSI
p-Be 40 GeV/c
Ξ event
[cm]
Y
X
Ω3YΩ3ZΩ2YΩ2ZΩ3YΩ2YΩ2ZΩ2Y Ω2Z Ω3YΩ3Y planes sequence
aspect ratio ≈ 9 !
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 28
24-25/01/05 GSI
p-Be 40 GeV/c
Ξ event
[cm]
Z
X
Ω3YΩ3ZΩ2YΩ2ZΩ3YΩ2YΩ2ZΩ2Y Ω2Z Ω3YΩ3Y planes sequence
aspect ratio ≈ 9 !
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 29
24-25/01/05 GSI
Vertex Finding
Primary vertex – from secondary tracks extrapolation (the μ-strips beam telescope used only in the WA97 p-Be run ) : - event-by-event (WA97) or
- run-by-run (to handle more peripheral collisions in NA57) V0 finding – pairs of oppositely charged tracks extrapolated
first to a ref. plane, then search for the point of nearest approach using helix parameterization
The nearest approach distance – a crucial parameter in selecting clean signals (removing background):
a typical cut value dmax/2 (alias close) = 0.04 cm
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 30
24-25/01/05 GSI
HYPERON DETECTION
30 cm
5 cm
5 cm
by
by
Plus many other associated tracks
Each hyperon (particle) assigned to
a centrality class according to MSD Ncharged
X
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 31
24-25/01/05 GSI
Mass Resolution: Ξ
158 A GeV/c 40 A GeV/c
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 32
24-25/01/05 GSI
Mass Resolution: K0s
158 A GeV/c 40 A GeV/c
FWHM = 24 MeVFWHM = 16 MeV
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 33
24-25/01/05 GSI
Summary
WA97 first application of pixel technology (Ω2 then Ω3/LHC1 chips) in conjunction with strips
NA57 pattern recognition and tracking entirely based on pixel detectors
WA97 and NA57 experience pixel detectors – a powerful tool for high precision tracking (3D)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 34
24-25/01/05 GSI
Technology still in rapid evolution,
future CERN LHC experiments/NA60
Final Remarks (1)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 35
24-25/01/05 GSI
Message to CBM
Final Remarks (2)
PIXEL TECHNOLOGY
is a powerful tool for physics
once good care is taken of all necessary
elements of hardware (calibration) and
software (alignment, noise and efficiency control)
environment
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 36
24-25/01/05 GSI
Physics Department, University of Athens, Greece; Dipartimento IA di Fisica dell'Università e del Politecnico di Bari and INFN, Bari, Italy; Fysisk Institutt , Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway ; Høgskolen i Bergen, Bergen, Norway; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Comenius
University, Bratislava, Slovakia; University of Catania and INFN, Catania, Italy; CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics, Geneva,
Switzerland; Institute of Experimental Physics Slovak Academy of Science, Kosice, Slovakia; P.J. Safárik University, Kosice, Slovakia; Fysisk
institutt, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo, Norway; University of Padua and INFN, Padua, Italy; Collège de France, Paris, France; Institute of Physics,
Prague, Czech Republic; University “La Sapienza'' and INFN, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche “E.R. Caianiello'' dell'Università and INFN, Salerno, Italy; State University of St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia; IReS/ULP, Strasbourg, France; Utrecht University and NIKHEF,
Utrecht, The Netherlands.
THE NA57 COLLABORATION
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 37
24-25/01/05 GSI
CENTRAL RAPIDITY YIELD MEASUREMENT
5.0
5.0
2
0 dd
ddd
CM
CM
y
y m TTcent
ym
NmyY
ONE UNIT OF RAPIDITY
FULL Pt RANGE
INTRODUCTION
T from Max-Log-Likelihood
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 38
24-25/01/05 GSI
Hyperon reconstructionΛ(cowboy) acceptance
cmBq
pd cms 4.37
2max
-
d
Δ
cmBq
pd cms 4.37
3
2max
cm9.0)10,(
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 39
24-25/01/05 GSI
Pixel maps (single cards)
Importance
of masking
noisy pixels
and (chips)
efficiency
monitoring
Data Base(36828 pixel cells) (49128 pixel cells)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 40
24-25/01/05 GSI
EXAMPLE OF ORHION PROCESSING(Pb-Pb 2000 Background)
• Background data – representative sample of all data (each 200th event – 5%), 24 files• Parallel running at CERN (Linux Batch) overall 1 day and 1 night human time• About 3-4 NCU hours per file
1440-1920 NCU hours of full 2000 data ( 230 Mevts ) ORHION processing (distributed between all labs !!)
Slightly less for Pb-Pb at 40 GeV/c, then still less for p-Be (one week)
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 41
24-25/01/05 GSI
Selection of Hyperons (and KS0)
X-Ξ vertexcloseΛ impact
Cleaning of the signals via geometrical cuts
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 42
24-25/01/05 GSI
WEIGHTING PARTICLES
• A weight is associated with each selected particle to
correct for acceptance, efficiencies and cuts ( ~few thousands)
BRN
Nweight
rec
gen 12
2 different selections (cuts)
spread
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 43
24-25/01/05 GSI
WEIGHTING PROCEDURE (2)
• Weights are calculated by Monte Carlo:
- generated hyperons (Ngen) are traced through a
GEANT simulation of the NA57 apparatus
- track hits are merged with true events
- resulting events are processed through the
reconstruction and analysis chain
- reconstructed hyperons are counted (Nrec)
Simulation thoroughly checked against real data
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 44
24-25/01/05 GSI
WEIGHT STATISTICS at 158 GeV/c
_
0sKParticle
weighted
collected
3340 2350 2718 6444 936 432 192
x400 x400 x50 x1 x1 x1 x1
• Most expensive cascade particles:1-3 NCU hours on LXPLUS, 10000 Λs and 10000 K0s about 40K NCU hours, alias 1 working month (estimate)
• 2001 p-Be data weighting ( 4000 Λs only) just in one week at CERN
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 45
24-25/01/05 GSI
DECONVOLUTION
An alternative method to weighting
(which is precise but CPU expensive),
applicable to high statistics samples
F. Antinori et al
Transverse mass spectra of strange and multi-strange
particles in Pb-Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c
Eur. Phys. J. C 14, 633-641 (2000)
gAf 1ˆ
Adam JacholkowskiCatania & CERN 46
24-25/01/05 GSI
Energy multiplicity dependence
logarithmic scaling