acuho-i construction & renovation survey 2006 report of findings
DESCRIPTION
ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings. Jim Day, University of Georgia Ray Thompson, Partner, MGT Cynthia Parish Balogh, Principal, MGT. June 25, 2006. Introduction. History of the Survey – Jim Grimm ACUHO-I and MGT Collaboration Project Goal s and Objectives - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
ACUHO-IACUHO-IConstruction & Renovation Construction & Renovation
SurveySurvey 2006 Report of Findings2006 Report of Findings Jim Day, University of Georgia Ray Thompson, Partner, MGT
Cynthia Parish Balogh, Principal, MGTJune 25, 2006
![Page 2: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
History of the Survey – Jim Grimm
ACUHO-I and MGT Collaboration
Project Goals and ObjectivesEstablish a national data set that is
reliable and useful for institutional planning
• To provide information that CHOs want and need• To create a user-friendly electronic survey• To produce an easily accessible report
IntroductionIntroduction
![Page 3: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Share results from the 2006 survey of 276 colleges and universities
Increase awareness and familiarity with this on-going ACUHO-I project
Facilitate discussion among CHOs concerning construction/renovation issues
Purpose of PresentationPurpose of Presentation
![Page 4: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Section A: Institutional Characteristics
Section B: Facilities Planning Initiatives
Section C: New Construction Projects
Section D: Renovation Projects
Section E: Survey Feedback
Survey InstrumentSurvey Instrument
![Page 5: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Survey ResultsSurvey Results
![Page 6: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
276 Respondents ~ 38% Response Rate
97% 4-Year, 3% 2-Year Institutions
63% Public, 35% Private, <2% Other
Responding InstitutionsResponding Institutions
![Page 7: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Construction or Renovation Construction or Renovation Completed Winter 2004 through Completed Winter 2004 through
Fall 2005Fall 2005
RenovationOnly, 36.9%
None, 38.8%New Construction
and Renovation, 12.7%
NewConstructionOnly, 11.6%
![Page 8: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Planning to Initiate Construction Planning to Initiate Construction or Renovation Project or Renovation Project
in Next 5 Yearsin Next 5 Years
RenovationOnly19.0%
NewConstruction
Only13.4%
Undecided10.4%
New Construction
and Renovation
53.5%
None3.7%
![Page 9: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Institution Has a Campus Master Institution Has a Campus Master Plan Plan
That Includes HousingThat Includes Housing
71.8%
28.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Yes No
![Page 10: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Institution Has a SeparateInstitution Has a SeparateHousing Master PlanHousing Master Plan
52.6%47.4%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Yes No
![Page 11: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
New Construction FindingsNew Construction Findings59 Institutions Reporting
65 New Construction Projects
![Page 12: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Type of Living UnitsType of Living Units
16.9%
26.2%
33.8%
20.0%
10.8%
7.7%
12.3%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%
Other
Apartments
Individual ContractApartments
Super Suites
Adjoining Suites
Modified TraditionalRooms
Traditional Rooms
![Page 13: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Number of Projects Number of Projects by Percent of Units Configured as by Percent of Units Configured as
Single Occupancy BedroomSingle Occupancy Bedroom
Nearly ½ of new projects were configured with 75% or more single occupancy bedrooms
A little more than 20% of new projects had no single occupancy bedrooms
![Page 14: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Number of ProjectsNumber of Projectsby Percent of Units Configured as by Percent of Units Configured as
Double Occupancy BedroomDouble Occupancy Bedroom
Nearly ¼ of new projects were configured with 75% or more double occupancy bedrooms
More than ½ of new projects had no double occupancy bedrooms
![Page 15: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Types of Space & Amenities in Types of Space & Amenities in FacilityFacility
Top ResponsesTop Responses
Laundry
Staff Office(s)
Staff Apartment(s)
Lobby
Elevator(s)
Electronic Security System
Central lounge
Kitchen(s)
80.1%
80.1%
72.3%
70.8%
70.8%
69.2%
63.1%
63.1%
![Page 16: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Types of Amenities in UnitTypes of Amenities in Unit
Telephone Outlet
Internet Access
Cable TV
Furniture
Air Conditioning
Individual Temperature Control
Carpeting
Refrigerator
95.4%
92.3%
92.3%
89.2%
87.7%
86.2%
78.5%
72.3%
Top ResponsesTop Responses
![Page 17: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Project Cost Per GSFProject Cost Per GSFBy Type of UnitBy Type of Unit
(2006 Survey)(2006 Survey)
Sample Sizes: Adjoining Suites: n = 3, Super Suites: n = 8, Apartments: n = 24
$141$154
$126
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
AdjoiningSuites
SuperSuites
Apartments
![Page 18: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Construction Cost Per GSFConstruction Cost Per GSFBy Type of UnitBy Type of Unit
(2006 Survey)(2006 Survey)
Sample Sizes: Adjoining Suites: n = 3, Super Suites: n = 6, Apartments: n = 23
$113
$128
$123
$105
$110
$115
$120
$125
$130
AdjoiningSuites
SuperSuites
Apartments
![Page 19: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Comparison of Project Cost Comparison of Project Cost Per GSF to 2003-04 SurveyPer GSF to 2003-04 Survey
$156$141 $148
$154 $151
$126
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
AdjoiningSuites
SuperSuites
Apartments
2003-04
2005-06% change:
- 9.6 %% change:
4.1 %% change:
- 16.6 %
![Page 20: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Comparison of Construction Cost Comparison of Construction Cost
Per GSF to 2003-04 SurveyPer GSF to 2003-04 Survey
$135
$113 $116
$128$120
$123
$0$20$40$60$80
$100$120$140$160$180
AdjoiningSuites
SuperSuites
Apartments
2003-04
2005-06% change:
- 16.3 %% change:
10.3 %% change:
2.5 %
![Page 21: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
RS Means Median Cost Per GSF RS Means Median Cost Per GSF EstimatesEstimates2000-20062000-2006
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Mid-RiseResidence Halls
Low-RiseResidence Halls
![Page 22: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
RS Means Costs Per GSF % RS Means Costs Per GSF % Change Change
2000 - 20062000 - 2006
Type of Hall 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006Low-RiseResidence Halls $87.20 $88.75 $92.00 $94.90 $100.00 $111.00 $117.00Mid-RiseResidence Halls $113.00 $116.00 $120.00 $124.00 $126.00 $141.00 $148.00
Percent Changefrom previous year 1.8% 3.7% 3.2% 5.4% 11.0% 5.4%
![Page 23: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Project Cost Per GSFProject Cost Per GSFAdjoining SuitesAdjoining Suites
Sample sizes: NEACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 1, AIMHO: n = 1
$88
$100
$234
$141
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250
AIMHO
SEAHO
NEACUHO
TOTAL
![Page 24: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Construction Cost Per GSF Construction Cost Per GSF Adjoining SuitesAdjoining Suites
Sample sizes:, NEACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 1, AIMHO: n = 1
$66
$93
$180
$113
$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180
AIMHO
SEAHO
NEACUHO
TOTAL
![Page 25: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Project Cost Per GSFProject Cost Per GSFSuper SuitesSuper Suites
Sample sizes: NEACUHO: n = 2, GLACUHO: n = 1, UMR-ACUHO: n = 1, NWACUHO: n = 2, SEAHO: n = 1, SWACUHO: n = 1
$104
$109
$132
$140
$178
$258
$154
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300
SEAHO
NWACUHO
UMR-ACUHO
SWACUHO
GLACUHO
NEACUHO
TOTAL
![Page 26: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Construction Cost Per GSFConstruction Cost Per GSFSuper SuitesSuper Suites
Sample sizes: NEACUHO: n = 2, SWACUHO: n = 1, NWACUHO: n = 1, UMR-ACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 1.The GLACUHO institution reported $15 construction cost/GSF – based on the data from other regions, it has been determined that this region is an outlier and is not used in this chart.
$67
$102
$114
$117
$238
$128
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250
SEAHO
UMR-ACUHO
NWACUHO
SWACUHO
NEACUHO
TOTAL
![Page 27: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Project Cost Per GSFProject Cost Per GSFApartmentsApartments
Sample sizes: NEACUHO = 4, GLACUHO: n = 2, WACUHO = 5, MACUHO = 1, NWACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 8, SWACUHO: n = 2, UMR-ACUHO: n = 1One additional SEAHO institution reported $1.31 construction cost/GSF – based on the data from other regions, it has been determined that this region is an outlier and is not used in this chart.
$12
$84
$91
$133
$145
$162
$168
$210
$126
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250
UMR-ACUHO
SWACUHO
SEAHO
NWACUHO
WACUHO
MACUHO
NEACUHO
GLACUHO
TOTAL
![Page 28: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Construction Cost Per GSFConstruction Cost Per GSFApartmentsApartments
Sample sizes: NEACUHO = 4, GLACUHO: n = 2, WACUHO = 4, MACUHO = 1, NWACUHO: n= 1, UMR-ACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 8, SWACUHO: n = 2
$66
$85
$99
$100
$129
$140
$175
$190
$123
$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200
SWACUHO
SEAHO
UMR-ACUHO
NWACUHO
MACUHO
WACUHO
GLACUHO
NEACUHO
TOTAL
![Page 29: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
LEED Certification for ProjectLEED Certification for Project
Certified5.1%
Silver 1.7%
The project has been LEED
certified at the following level
6.8%
We are not seeking LEED
certification78.0%
The project has been
registered for LEED
certification15.3%
![Page 30: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Reason Facility Was BuiltReason Facility Was Built Meet demand for additional beds (83%)
Meet the needs and interests of students (71%)
Increase the variety of housing options (59%) Increase percent of undergrads housed (55%) Keep pace with enrollment growth (45%) Provide higher levels of privacy (45%) Replace outdated facilities (34%)
Primary Reason: Meet demand for additional beds (38%)
![Page 31: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
New Facility OwnershipNew Facility Ownership
77.3%
15.2%
3.0% 0.0% 4.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
College/University
InstitutionallyAffiliated
Foundation
Privatenon-profitfoundation
Private for-profitdeveloper/owner
Other
![Page 32: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Management of New FacilityManagement of New Facility
90.9%
1.5% 1.5% 4.5% 1.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
College/University
InstitutionallyAffiliated
Foundation
Privatenon-profitfoundation
Privatefor-profit
developer/owner
Other privatepropertymanager
![Page 33: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Management of Management of Foundation-Owned FacilityFoundation-Owned Facility (only) (only)
66.7%
8.3%
16.7%8.3%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
College/University
InstitutionallyAffiliated
Foundation
Private for-profitdeveloper/owner
Other privateproperty manager
![Page 34: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Project Primary Funding Project Primary Funding MechanismMechanism
3.1%
1.5%
1.5%
3.1%
9.2%
9.2%
13.8%
15.4%
72.3%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
Other
State appropriations
Private developerfinanced
Donor
Taxable revenuebonds
Bank loan
Reserve funds
Operating funds
Tax-exemptrevenue bonds
![Page 35: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
If Debt Financed, Who Is If Debt Financed, Who Is Responsible For Debt?Responsible For Debt?
College/University
77.3%
Institutionally affiliated
foundation15.1%
Private foundation
1.9%
Other5.7%
![Page 36: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Renovation FindingsRenovation Findings86 Institutions Reporting
193 Renovation Projects
54 Rehabilitation or Modified Rehabilitation Projects
![Page 37: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Extent of RenovationExtent of Renovation(all institutions)(all institutions)
13.5%
20.7%
37.8%
18.7%
9.3%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%
GeneralRefurbishment
CosmeticRefurbishment
SystemRefurbishment
ModifiedRehabilitation
Rehabilitation
![Page 38: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Type of Living UnitType of Living Unit (Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)
5.6%
9.3%
9.3%11.1%
5.6%0.0%
3.7%1.9%
16.7%13.0%
3.7%3.7%
55.6%
63.0%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%
Other
Apartments
Individual contractapartments
Super suites
Adjoining suites
Modified traditionalrooms
Traditional rooms
Before Renovation
After Renovation
![Page 39: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Project Cost Per GSF By RegionProject Cost Per GSF By Region(Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)
Sample sizes: NWACUHO: n = 3, MACUHO: n = 7, UMR-ACUHO: n = 2, WACUHO: n = 5, NEACUHO: n = 8, SEAHO: n = 8, GLACUHO: n = 5, AIMHO: n = 1, SWACUHO: n = 1
$5
$45
$96
$98
$109
$125
$219
$220
$240
$129
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250
SWACUHO
AIMHO
GLACUHO
SEAHO
NEACUHO
WACUHO
UMR-ACUHO
MACUHO
NWACUHO
Total
![Page 40: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Construction Cost Per GSF By Construction Cost Per GSF By RegionRegion
(Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)
Sample sizes: NWACUHO: n = 3, MACUHO: n = 7, UMR-ACUHO: n = 2, SEAHO: n = 8, NEACUHO: n = 8, GLACUHO: n = 5, WACUHO: n = 5, AIMHO: n = 1, SWACUHO: n = 1
$5
$33
$93
$96
$97
$115
$181
$208
$273
$122
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300
SWACUHO
AIMHO
WACUHO
GLACUHO
NEACUHO
SEAHO
UMR-ACUHO
MACUHO
NWACUHO
Total
![Page 41: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Reason for RenovationReason for Renovation (Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)
Update facilities (93%) Meet the needs and interests of students (65%) Other reasons (24%) Provide higher levels of privacy (20%)
Increase the variety of housing options (19%)
Accommodate academic or special programs (19%)
Meet the demand for additional beds (17%)
Primary Reason: Update facilities (63%)
![Page 42: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Method of Project FundingMethod of Project Funding(Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)
5.6%
1.9%
33.3%
35.2%
42.6%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0%
Other
Stateappropriations
Tax exemptrevenue bonds
Operating funds
Reserve funds
No respondents indicated using taxable revenue bonds, a bank loan, donor funds, or a private developer to finance their rehab projects.
![Page 43: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
If Debt Financed,If Debt Financed,Who is Responsible for DebtWho is Responsible for Debt??
(Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)
Other16.7%
College/University
83.3%
![Page 44: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Project Includes Rental Rate Project Includes Rental Rate IncreaseIncrease (Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)
Yes28.3%
No 69.8%
Undecided1.9%
![Page 45: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Discussion & QuestionsDiscussion & Questions
![Page 46: ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022012910/5681596b550346895dc6aac9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
DiscussionDiscussion
Issues for Other Campuses
Barriers to Construction & Renovation
Innovative Ideas