active method to mitigate induced voltages on pipelinesapic/uploads/forum/pst1f2018.pdf · 2018. 5....

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Difei Tang, Jing Yong and Wilsun Xu Active Method to Mitigate Induced Voltages on Pipelines Background Field Measurement Reference Active Mitigation Conclusion Experiment Results Harmonic Voltage Induction on Pipeline [email protected] [email protected] Contact The severest induced voltage occurs at the two terminals; The change of terminal impedance changes the induced voltage at both terminals; Induced voltage varies according to load currents of overhead AC power lines and soil resistivity. R L Rg Rg Active Mitigation System Rs Cs Cs Rs R L Cs Rs Rc Lc 1km 1km Ip Ic Ig Vind Vsa Vg Cs Rs Rc Lc EMF [1] CIGRE Working Group 36.02 Guide, “Guide on the influence of high voltage AC power systems on metallic pipelines,” 1995. [2] EPRI Document EL-904, “Mutual design considerations for overhead AC transmission lines and gas transmission pipelines,” 1978. Active mitigation method for induced voltage on buried pipelines; Two neutralizing voltage sources; Field measurement and Experiment validation. Before Mitigation After Mitigation Pipeline Equivalent Circuit Active Mitigation System Parallel length 2 km Separate distance 20 m Soil resistivity 100Ωm + + _ _ V induced Pipeline Powerline EMF (Electromotive Force) Insulating coating Metallic pipe Holiday Current Power line current EMF in a pipeline; EMF A potential difference V induced V induced drives a current to ground; This current causes pipeline corrosion and personnel safety issue Powerline Pipeline (1km) Test Post Grounding rod Voltage recorder (no AC mitigation measures & parallel pipelines) (no branches in parallel zone) Grounding rod Voltage recorder Test Post V A V B EMF=V A -V B Measurement Setting (Collaborate with ATCO gas) GPS - synchronized voltage recorder ±50V differential, 3 channel 12 bit ADC Sampling rate: 3840S/s (64S per cycle) Site of Field Measurement Induced Voltage at Pipeline Terminals Cycles Induced Voltage (V) Cycles Induced Voltage (V) Left Terminal (M1) Right Terminal (M2) Harmonic Order Percentage of the RMS of Induced Harmonic Voltage (%) Derivation of Induced EMF Obtain the Induced voltage at pipeline turning points A and B, then EMF=VA-VB cycles Induced EMF (V) Harmonic Order Percentage of the RMS of Induced Harmonic Voltage (%) Equivalent Circuit Two active sources that are applied to the left and right terminals Superposition Principle Practical Application 1) A power supply; 2) A controllable voltage source; 3) A voltage detector.

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

    University of Alberta

    Difei Tang, Jing Yong and Wilsun Xu

    Active Method to Mitigate Induced Voltages

    on Pipelines

    Background

    Field Measurement

    Reference

    Active Mitigation

    Conclusion

    Experiment Results

    Harmonic Voltage Induction on Pipeline

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    The severest induced voltage occurs at the two

    terminals;

    The change of terminal impedance changes the

    induced voltage at both terminals;

    Induced voltage varies according to load currents

    of overhead AC power lines and soil resistivity.

    R L

    RgRg

    Active

    Mitigation

    System

    Rs Cs CsRs

    R L

    CsRs

    Rc

    Lc

    1km 1km

    Ip

    IcIg

    Vind

    Vsa

    VgCsRs

    Rc

    Lc

    EMF

    [1] CIGRE Working Group 36.02 Guide, “Guide on the influence of high voltage

    AC power systems on metallic pipelines,” 1995.

    [2] EPRI Document EL-904, “Mutual design considerations for overhead AC

    transmission lines and gas transmission pipelines,” 1978.

    Active mitigation method for induced voltage on

    buried pipelines;

    Two neutralizing voltage sources;

    Field measurement and Experiment validation.

    Before Mitigation After Mitigation

    Pipeline Equivalent

    Circuit

    Active

    Mitigation

    System

    Parallel length 2 km

    Separate distance 20 m

    Soil resistivity 100Ωm

    +

    + _

    _

    Vinduced

    Pipeline

    Powerline

    EMF (Electromotive Force)

    Insulating

    coating

    Metallic pipeHoliday

    Current

    Power line current EMF in a pipeline;

    EMF A potential difference Vinduced

    Vinduced drives a current to ground;

    This current causes pipeline corrosion and personnel

    safety issue

    Powerline

    Pipeline (1km)Test Post

    Grounding rod

    Voltage

    recorder

    (no AC mitigation measures & parallel pipelines)

    (no branches in parallel zone)

    Grounding rod

    Voltage

    recorder

    Test Post

    VA VB

    EMF=VA-VB

    Measurement Setting (Collaborate with ATCO gas)

    GPS-synchronized voltage recorder

    ±50V differential, 3 channel

    12 bit ADC

    Sampling rate: 3840S/s (64S per cycle)

    Site of Field Measurement

    Induced Voltage at Pipeline Terminals

    Cycles

    Indu

    ced

    Vo

    ltag

    e (V

    )

    Cycles

    Indu

    ced

    Vo

    ltag

    e (V

    )

    Left Terminal (M1) Right Terminal (M2)

    Harmonic Order

    Perc

    enta

    ge

    of

    the R

    MS

    of

    Induced

    Harm

    onic

    Vo

    ltag

    e (%

    )

    Derivation of Induced EMF

    Obtain the Induced voltage at pipeline turning points A and B,

    then EMF=VA-VB

    cycles

    Induced

    EM

    F (

    V)

    Harmonic Order

    Perc

    enta

    ge

    of

    the R

    MS

    of

    Induced

    Harm

    onic

    Vo

    ltag

    e (%

    )

    Equivalent Circuit

    Two active sources that are applied to the left

    and right terminals

    Superposition Principle

    Practical Application

    1) A power supply;

    2) A controllable voltage source;

    3) A voltage detector.