action plan template educator academy may 2011 peru
TRANSCRIPT
Action Plan TemplateEducator Academy
May 2011
PERU
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
2Intel Confidential22
Action Plan Template
Intel ISEF 2010
Educator AcademyMay 2011
PERU
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
3
What are the three greatest obstacles that you face:
Science Fairs & Science and Math curriculums
Lack of time to develop science courses and workshops at the request of Ministry of Education.
Low student participation in and/or organization of science fairs
Lack of teacher training program on research skills
Teachers cannot develop and use different strategies to guide students in adequate research process
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
4
Science Fairs & Science and Math curriculums
Lack of local budget to cover costs of participating in international science fairs (e.g. display materials)
Student participation in international fairs is not guaranteed
Lack of training for science fair judges
Students do not get adequate feedback on their science projects throughout the year
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
5
OVERALL PROPOSAL
• IMPROVE QUALITY OF SCIENCE FAIRS IN THE COUNTRY.
• IMPROVE PROJECTS / STUDENTS STANDARDS.
• INVOLVE NEW AGENTS AND INSTITUTIONS FOR EXTERNAL SOURCES OF FUNDING.
• MOTIVATION FOR SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH
• PROMOTE A REGIONAL FAIR OF LAR COUNTRIES
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
6
High Level Goals
• Long term goals (3-5 years)
– Increase number of students participating in science fairs by 20% within 3 years
– Incorporate teacher training program on research skills in the Ministry of Education’s National Teacher Training Program
– Guarantee participation of all educational levels in science fairs (preschool to high school)
– Incorporate the National Science and Technology Fair in regional education plans and motivating, planning its growth
– Increase number of hours of teaching science in the education system
– Strengthen national education policies that seek to improve science courses in schools
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
7
High Level Goals
• Short term goals– Organize teacher training program on research skills (“Students as
Scientists)
– Improve project evaluation through training programs for judges
– Establish a bank of mentors to assist students in creating science projects
– Start a program to follow up past winners of the National Sience and Technology Fair
– Continuously improve local science fairs to international standards
– Organize follow-up processes of different science fair-related activities
– Strengthen local networks to improve organization of science fairs
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
8
Objectives
The cental government and civil society participate in the
development of scientific knowledge geared towards
science fairs‒ Student participation in science fairs will increase 20% within next three
years
‒ Organize teacher training program
‒ Involve facilitators and benficiaries of our institution’s programs in helping us assist students and evaluate their projects
‒ Systemic changes in training programs: Include in teacher training plans, programs or activities that promote scientific investigation in schools
‒ Institutionalize science fairs and maintain an investment budget for the development and relevant training of science fairs
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
9
Action Plan– Steps to Meet Your Goals and Objectives
Action Measure success? Who’s Responsible? Deadline?
Organize national training programs to improve the quality of projects
5 regional training programsReach 300 teachers
CONCYTEC (Science and Technology National Council)
Oct 2011
Project evaluation Creation of National Commission of JudgesTraining course for judgesJudging manual
CONCYTEC (Science and Technology National Council)
Jul-Aug 2011
Establish a database of researchers to help mentor students
30 research mentors CONCYTEC (Science and Technology National Council)
Sept 2011
Follow up of students who participated in past science fair projects
Database of 50 student winners of National Science and Technology Fair
CONCYTEC (Science and Technology National Council)
Aug 2011
Review and standardization of the current criteria and procedures of the National Science and Technology Fair
Criteria to reach international standards
CONCYTEC (Science and Technology National Council)
Nov 2011
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
10
Intel ISEF Educator Academy
Highlight what your team felt was the key learningfrom the Educator Academy• The importance of science and technology for the
development of communities• The use of the scientific method as a means to know
our reality• Promote research through the organization of
science activities for young people • Education based on research projects• Science needs to be researched and practiced, not
taught or learn.• Central government must participate in the curricula
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
11
Intel ISEF Educator Academy
Highlight what your team felt was the key learningfrom the Educator Academy• Central government must participate in the
curricula elaboration and enforce a scientific knowledge
• Private sector should have an active rol in education.
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
12
Intel ISEF Educator Academy
Which Shop Talks were the most beneficial for your
team? • Shelley Shott, Oregon – USA, Coaching materials to
help your students succeed.
• Kristin Gregory Ohio – USA, Building a competitive science program on a shoestring budget (an Intel Schools of Distinction Finalist School)
• Ken Hess, California – USA, Science buddies: free teacher and student resources for science projects and independent student research
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy
13
Intel ISEF Educator Academy What types of Shop Talks were missing?
• The process of organizing science fairs.• Integrating science to schools curricula.• How to cope with science in life.• The meaning and purpose of scientific knowledge
and research in every day life.• Education beyond public sector initiatives