acronym/tab name study wls wisconsin longitudinal study nas va … · 2015-08-20 · contents...
TRANSCRIPT
Contents
Acronym/Tab name Study Comments
WLS Wisconsin Longitudinal Study
NAS VA Normative Aging Study
PSID Panel Study of Income Dynamics
PSID-TA PSID- Transition into Adulthood (TA)
HRS Health and Retirement Study
MIDUS I Midlife in the United States (MIDUS)
1995-1996MIDUS II Midlife in the United States (MIDUS)
2004-2006NHATS National Health and Aging Trend Study
(NHATS)CDC-VES CDC-Vietnam Experience Study
BLSA Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
(BLSA)NLS- Older men National Longitudinal Surveys (NLS)-
Older menNLS- Young men National Longitudinal Surveys (NLS)-
Young menUnion Army study Early Indicators of Later Work Levels,
Disease,and Death (EI)LSOA The 1984-1990 Longitudinal study of
Aging (LSOA)LSOA II The 1994-2000 Second Longitudinal
study of Aging (LSOA II)EPESE Established Populations for
Epidemiologic Studies of the ElderlyHEPESE Hispanic EPESE (not many Hispanic
veterans in the studies)NLMS National longitudinal mortality study
(NLMS)Project TALENT Project Talent Waiting for Dr. Reboks's reply
NSFH National survey of families and
households (NSFH)NSHAP National social life, health and aging
project (NSHAP)NHANES NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup
Study (NHEFS)NSBlackAm National Survey of Black Americans
NHIS National Health Interview Survey
LSOG Longitudinal Study of Generations
Grant Grant Study of Adult Development
Glueck Glueck Study
PHSE- NC EPESE Piedmont Health Survey of the Elderly,
4th In-Person SurveyBRFSS Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
SystemELSA English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
DMHDS Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and
Development Study (also known as the DYNOPTA The Dynamic Analyses to Optimise
Ageing (DYNOPTA) projectALSA the Australian Longitudinal Study of
AgeingBCS70 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70)
CLSA Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
(CLSA)HALCyon the Healthy Ageing across the Life
Course (HALCyon)
Due to the lack of veteran information,
mminimal description of this project is
presented
Air Force Health Study (Ranch Hand) AFHS (Ranch Hand) ok 1/14
NAS/NRC World war II Twin Registry WW2 Twin Registry ok 1/14
National Vietnam Veterans'
Readjustment Study
NVVRS ok 1/14
FALCon FALCon project: Measurment and
modelling of Function Across the Life
Course
insufficient information on the website
VETSA Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging data available from investigators
ARIC Atherosclerosis risk in communities No data specifying veterans
CHS Cardiovascular health study No data specifying veterans
These studies do not have sufficient information (at this point) to warrant inclusion
Template v2.11 Jan2014 1
Contents
Fels Fels Longitudinal Study No data specifying veterans
Framingham No data specifying veterans
SLS Seattle Longitudinal Study Very few veterans in SLS
CHS Charleston Heart Study No data specifying military services
(only indicating 47 veterans)
Notes from Ron Spiro
R24 website
Search studies on NIA website
OSU employee website https://osu.workforcehosting.com/workforce/Logon.do
http://nihlibrary.ors.nih.gov/nia/ps/niadb.asp
https://sharepoint.oregonstate.edu/sites/militarylifecourse/default.aspx
A couple of studies run by NHLBI have good health data (and possibly
Template v2.11 Jan2014 2
Template
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name
Website
NIA link
other website(s)
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study objective(s))
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or ongoing)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local 4=international
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection 1=closed/ended
2=passive (eg mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
Birth cohort(s)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal 2=multiple
cohorts 3=intervention 4=twin 5=other
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other
Selection criteria
for sample
Open or closed to
enrollment
Method
Total N at
enrollment
N (male), N (female)
Military N N (male), N (female)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I (1917-1918)
3=WWII (1941-1946) 4=Korea (1951-55)
5=Vietnam (1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS
(1991-92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
Measures of
military service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on era/
combat exposure/deployment 3=further
information on military service
Ethnicity/ Race
Assessment of
PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have you ever
been diagnosed with/treated for PTSD?)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS, 3=CIDI,
4=CAPS, 5=other)
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI, 3=PCL,
4=Other)
Other measures trauma
life events
coping
desirable/undesirable effects of military service
homecoming
unit cohesion/social support
prisoner of war status
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education, housing,
healthcare)
positive outcomes of military service or post-
traumatic growth
VA disability rating
psychological well-being / distress
social well-being
Insert Study name here
Template v2.11 Jan2014 3
Template
Current Status Choices Study information
Insert Study name here
economic well-being
information from military or VA records?
health assessment (1=self-report, 2=biomarkers,
3=administrative data, 4=informant report,
5=other)
COMMENTS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 4
Other issues to consider addressing …
1 when were military data collected?
2 was information on military service collected from RECORDS or by SELF-REPORT?
3 Search strategy: Search the database via search program rather than (or in addition to)
looking at variables listed. Key word example: active duties
4 Multiple responses for Study Responses are acceptable
5 If possible, identify variables that indicate when military service began/ended (and give variable
names)
6 When possible, if entering a response of e.g., 5 for Design, try and specify what the "other"
category is
7 For variables, if possible, enter the date/wave/etc. when the data were collected (if multiple
years/waves, specify each wave, or state "all")
8 if another cohort is added (e.g., children, spouses), then create another template (with suffix a,
b, c, etc.) for each unique sub-study (i.e., if the new cohort gets NEW measures, add a
separate template)
9 if possible, give link to webpage where information on specific variables was obtained
FORMATTING:
1. copy the TEMPLATE to another tab and edit that. This should ensure that (a) each tab prints all 3 cols
on same page and that the rows expand as information is added
NVVRS
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name National Vietnam Veterans' Readjustment
StudyWebsite http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/pages/nvvrs-
docs.asp
NIA link NVVRS in the news http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/news/press-
releases/2013/vietnam-vets-with-ptsd-more-than-
twice-as-likely-to-have-heart-disease.html
other website(s) Finding summary http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/pages/vietnam-
vets-study.asp
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study objective(s)) The National Vietnam Veterans' Readjustment
Study (NVVRS) was conducted in response to a
congressional mandate in 1983 for an investigation
of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and other
postwar psychological problems among Vietnam
Veterans (Kulka et al., 1990a, Kulka et al., 1990b).
The purpose of the NVVRS was to obtain accurate
prevalence rates of postwar psychological problems
in order to serve the needs of the nation's Veterans.
The NVVRS sample is arguably the most
representative group of Vietnam Veterans to be
studied to date. Understanding the effect of the
Vietnam War on Veterans is important in
developing and applying mental health treatments
to those who continue to suffer from PTSD or other
psychological/readjustment problems. Recent
researchers have confirmed that premilitary, during
military, and postmilitary risk factors for PTSD. An
important message is that social support plays a
critical role in reducing PTSD symptoms and
increasing one's level of functioning.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or ongoing) between November 1986 and February 1988,
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local 4=international 1 (representative national samples of Vietnam
Veterans and their peers who did not serve in the
military during the Vietnam era)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection 1=closed/ended
2=passive (eg mortality) followup 3=unsure/other1 (NB: The National Vietnam Veterans Longitudinal
Study [NVVLS) was fielded in 2013 so longitudinal
followup may soon be available.)
Birth cohort(s) All of those whose life was affected by Vietnam
War services (1940-1955 and beyond)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal 2=multiple
cohorts 3=intervention 4=twin 5=other0 (see note above re: Current Status -- may soon b
e 1=longitudinal)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1 (representative national samples of Vietnam
Veterans and their peers who did not serve in the
military during the Vietnam era)
Selection criteria
for sample
Veterans who served in the armed forces during the
Vietnam era
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
NVVRS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 6
NVVRS
Current Status Choices Study information
NVVRS
Method Two-stage design in which a lay interview was
conducted with a large sample and then a clinical
interview was conducted with a smaller subsample.
Participants in the first stage were 1,632 male and
female Vietnam theater veterans, 716 era veterans
who served during the Vietnam era but not in
Vietnam, and 668 civilians; ns reflect response
rates of 83, 76, and 70%, respectively. Participants
in the second stage were 344 Vietnam theater
veterans and 96 era veterans: all probable cases of
PTSD plus a sample of probable noncases who
were oversampled for high combat exposure. The
ns reflect response rates of 85% among theater
veterans and 83% among era veterans.
Total N at
enrollment
N (male), N (female) Total N= 3,016 (1632 Vietnam veterans, 716
veterans served during the Vietnam era, and 668
civilians)
Military N N (male), N (female) Total N= 2348 (n=1,632 Vietnam theater veterans;
26% women and 74% men) (n=716 Vietnam era
veterans, not sure about gender ratio); women
(mostly registered nurses), African American and
Hispanic American men, and those with
serviceconnected
disabilities were oversampled.
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I (1917-1918)
3=WWII (1941-1946) 4=Korea (1951-55)
5=Vietnam (1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS
(1991-92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
5
Measures of
military service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on era/
combat exposure/deployment 3=further
information on military service
2 (H30, H33, H34,H35, H44, H45, H46, J9, J16,
J19, J35-36, J38, J40, J43, J45, J49, J53, J55, J58,
J59, M, and N etc.), 3 (Military serviice history in
Section H)
Ethnicity/ Race (Underestimate some minorities, including native
American, Asian American, and Pacific Islander
veterans)
Assessment of
PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have you ever
been diagnosed with/treated for PTSD?)There are three primary indicators. According to a
2006 analysis, 15-19% of Vietnam veterans
experienced PTSD at some point after the war.2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS, 3=CIDI,
4=CAPS, 5=other)2 (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R PTSD
module for non-patient version)3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI, 3=PCL,
4=Other)3 (1, 2)
Other measures trauma Stressful and traumatic life events (Section M)life events Stressful and traumatic life events (Section M)coping Over 100 life-adjustment indicesdesirable/undesirable effects of military service Military service history (Section H); Vietnam
experience (Section J)homecoming Post-service (Section K)unit cohesion/social support N/Aprisoner of war status H33h, H48h, J50, J62d, J64use GI benefits (GI Bill for education, housing,
healthcare)K35
Template v2.11 Jan2014 7
NVVRS
Current Status Choices Study information
NVVRS
positive outcomes of military service or post-
traumatic growthJ79, K2, K3
VA disability rating Yespsychological well-being / distress Depression, anxiety, and alcohol problems are the
most common psychological disorders.social well-being Survey Section T Social Support; Other
readjustment problems such as occupational
instability, marital conflicts, and family problemseconomic well-being Questions about income (U22-U24), financial
situation (M9), financial troubles (R228, R255)information from military or VA records? Yeshealth assessment (1=self-report, 2=biomarkers,
3=administrative data, 4=informant report,
5=other)
1 (Survey Section P: Physical health status); 2 (The
study used state-of-the-art imaging scans with
positron emission tomography, which measures
blood flow to the heart muscle and identifies areas
of reduced blood flow, at rest and following stress.)
COMMENTS Funding sources The study was supported by grants from NHLBI
(K24HL077506), (R01 HL68630), and
(R21HL093665), the National Institute on Aging
(R01 AG026255), the National Institute of Mental
Health (K24 MH076955), and by the American
Heart Association. Support also was provided by
the National Center for Advancing Translational
Sciences (UL1TR000454) and the National Center
for Research Resources (MO1-RR00039).NVVRS report Richard A. Kulka (et al), Trauma and the Vietnam
War Generation: Report of Findings from the
National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study
(New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1990; ISBN 0-87630-
573-7)
Template v2.11 Jan2014 8
WW2 Twin Registry
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name National Academy of Sciences-National Research
Council (NAS-NRC) Twin Registry of World War II
Male Veterans
Website http://www.iom.edu/activities/veterans/twinsstudy.a
spx
NIA link N/A
other website(s) http://www.iom.edu/Activities/Veterans/TwinsStudy
/Background.aspx
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study objective(s)) The Twin Registry is a program of the Medical
Follow-up Agency, a division of the Institute of
Medicine, a part of the National Academies since
1955. In addition to the general advantages of twin
studies, the Twin Registry offers at least two special
advantages: its population-based ascertainment
and the veteran status of its members. Records-
based, computerized data have come largely from
the Department of Veterans Affairs, and there have
been three major epidemiologic questionnaires,
undertaken roughly every 15 years. The early
focus of the registry was on medical conditions, and
recently the focus is on chronic disease
epidemiology. Work on a DNA specimen bank is
now a top priority, due to the increasing force of
mortality in this twin cohort. Over the years, the
Registry has shown itself to be quite flexible in
accommodating studies over a wide range of
topics: atopic dermatitis, schizophrenia, manic-
depressive illness, headache, multiple sclerosis,
cancer mortality, alcoholic cirrhosis, Alzheimer's
disease, Parkinson's disease, and stroke, among
others. Access to the National Academies’ Twin
Registry is granted only upon approval by the Twins
Committee.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or ongoing) 1960s, Ongoing
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local 4=international 1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection 1=closed/ended
2=passive (eg mortality) followup 3=unsure/other0, 3 (functioning as a registry, which researchers
have to apply to contact the twin veterans)
Birth cohort(s) 1917-1927
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal 2=multiple
cohorts 3=intervention 4=twin 5=other1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1, 3 (Populational sample of twin veterans of
WWII)
Selection criteria
for sample
Twins who had served in the Armed Forces during
WWII and were born between 1917-1927
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
NAS-NRC WWII Twin Registry
Template v2.11 Jan2014 9
WW2 Twin Registry
Current Status Choices Study information
NAS-NRC WWII Twin Registry
Method Three major epidemiologic surveys (Q2:1972,
Q7:1985, Q8:2000) have gathered data via mailed
questionnaires (available on the website). The
twins themselves are also an invaluable source of
information about their co-twins, which can be used
to confirm data obtained directly from the other
member of the pair. The Registry receives no
funding for its ongoing maintenance which includes
acquisition of information (address, vital status and
cause of death, hospitalizations, etc.) from various
outside sources to update the Registry. All
information obtained from studies utilizing Twin
Registry should become a part of the Registry and
may be made available to future investigators.
Total N at
enrollment
N (male), N (female) 31,848 (Males only) (= 15,924 pairs of twins)
Military N N (male), N (female) 31,848 (Males only)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I (1917-1918)
3=WWII (1941-1946) 4=Korea (1951-55)
5=Vietnam (1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS
(1991-92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
3 (mostly)
Measures of
military service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on era/
combat exposure/deployment 3=further
information on military service
1
Ethnicity/ Race White Americans
Assessment of
PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have you ever
been diagnosed with/treated for PTSD?)Twin Registry questionnaires did not ask specific
questions about PTSD. Data might be collected in
the studies approved to use the Twin Registry. So
far, no studies using the registry have focused on
PTSD yet. (ICD-8 included in Q7 and/or Q8)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS, 3=CIDI,
4=CAPS, 5=other)
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI, 3=PCL,
4=Other)
Other measures trauma N/Alife events N/Acoping N/Adesirable/undesirable effects of military service N/A
homecoming N/Aunit cohesion/social support N/Aprisoner of war status N/Ause GI benefits (GI Bill for education, housing,
healthcare)N/A
positive outcomes of military service or post-
traumatic growthN/A
VA disability rating N/Apsychological well-being / distress Traits in Q7, Geriatric Depression Scale (short
form, 15 items) in Q8social well-being Questions about oneself and with family, such as
family contact frequency, quality, marital status,
and occupation in Q2, Q7, & Q8
Template v2.11 Jan2014 10
WW2 Twin Registry
Current Status Choices Study information
NAS-NRC WWII Twin Registry
economic well-being Questions about financial status, feeling after daily
work, and/or retirement status, and/or retirement
planning added in Q7 and Q8information from military or VA records? Veteran statushealth assessment (1=self-report, 2=biomarkers,
3=administrative data, 4=informant report,
5=other)
1 (General health, lifestyle such as drinking and
smoking habits, and diet in Q2, Q7, Q8)
(Handedness added in Q7) (Q8 questions are in
more organized sections; questions about daily
routine, some medicine, urination, daily activities,
COMMENTS Q7 (1985) and Q8 (2000) Asked information about the twin participant's
parents
Master file (referred to Q7 data) Including service information (column 357-368),
death related information (369-394), zygosity (395)
Two reviews about the Twin Registry 2002:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12537883;
2006:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17254441
Template v2.11 Jan2014 11
AFHS (Ranch Hand)
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Air Force Health Study (AFHS, also known as the
Ranch Hand Study)
Website http://www.iom.edu/Activities/Veterans/AirForceHe
althStudyResearchAssets.aspx
NIA link N/A
other website(s) Details on the Study from the Institute
of Medicine report: "Disposition of the
Air Force Health Study"
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2006/Disposition-of-
the-Air-Force-Health-Study.aspx
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study objective(s)) In 1979, the US Congress directed that an
epidemiologic study be conducted to evaluate the
frequency and nature of adverse health effects that
might be related to exposure to Agent Orange and
other military herbicides used during the Vietnam
Conflict. AFHS is a long-term epidemiologic
analysis of Air Force personnel who conducted
aerial spraying of herbicides during the Vietnam
War, involved Operation Ranch Hand veterans and
a comparison group of Air Force personnel who
served in Southeast Asia but who were not involved
in herbicide spraying operations. The data and
biospecimens may be used for studies of other
issues, including the long-term health of military
veterans, other effects of service during the
Vietnam Conflict, the health impacts of aging, and
disease-related biomarkers to further the goals of
understanding the determinants of health and
promoting wellness.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or ongoing) Most of the AFHS information collection effort was
focused on the morbidity component of the
study.The physical examination cycles correspond
to years 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 of the study. AFHS
investigators refer to the 1982 baseline morbidity
evaluation as Cycle 1, the first follow-up (1985) as
Cycle2, the second (1987) as Cycle3, the third
(1992) as Cycle 4, the fourth (1997) as Cycle5, and
the fifth (2002) as Cycle 6. Mortality and
reproductive studies are reported independent of
morbid-ity follow-ups. (see Figure 2-1 in the IOM
report for the study time line)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local 4=international 4 (Soldiers exposed to doxins and herbicides in
Vietnam War)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection 1=closed/ended
2=passive (eg mortality) followup 3=unsure/other1 (All the medical records, data, and biological
specimens collected in the study were closed on
September 30, 2006)
Birth cohort(s) Around 1933-1947
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal 2=multiple
cohorts 3=intervention 4=twin 5=other1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 3
AFHS (Ranch Hand)
Template v2.11 Jan2014 12
AFHS (Ranch Hand)
Current Status Choices Study information
AFHS (Ranch Hand)
Selection criteria
for sample
For both the mortality and morbidity branches of
the study, the exposed population was defined as
Ranch Hand personnel (n ≈ 1,269) who had served
among the C-123 crews and the ground support
crews between 1962 and 1971 (AFHS, 1984).
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method For morbidity and reproductive studies:
Questionnaire, physical examination, medical
records; for mortality studies: SSA, IRS, VA, and
AF personnel center (See Figure 2.2 in the IOM
report for data sources).
Total N at
enrollment
N (male), N (female) In 1982, there was 1,046 Ranch Hands and 1,223
comparison subjects (Michalek, 2005). Moreovero,
in all waves, 2,758 subjects participated in at least
one cycle exam. The mortality component of the
study followed over 20,000 Vietnam War-era
veterans with service in Southeast Asia for nearly
25 years.
Military N N (male), N (female) All the participants served in the military
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I (1917-1918)
3=WWII (1941-1946) 4=Korea (1951-55)
5=Vietnam (1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS
(1991-92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
5 (served between 1962-1971)
Measures of
military service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on era/
combat exposure/deployment 3=further
information on military service
2 (e.g., combat service); 3 (e.g., military
occupation)
Ethnicity/ Race Ranch Hands were predominately non-Black—98%
of officers and 92% of enlisted (AFHS, 1984a).
Assessment of
PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have you ever
been diagnosed with/treated for PTSD?)N/A (See Appendix B for data overview:
http://www.iom.edu/Activities/Veterans/AirForceHea
lthStudyResearchAssets/Data%20Forms%20and%
20Questionnaires/Other%20Forms.aspx) (or
uploaded document in Military Life Course website)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS, 3=CIDI,
4=CAPS, 5=other)N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI, 3=PCL,
4=Other)3 (MMPI was administered in Cycle 1)
Other measures trauma N/Alife events N/Acoping N/Adesirable/undesirable effects of military service N/A
homecoming N/Aunit cohesion/social support N/Aprisoner of war status N/Ause GI benefits (GI Bill for education, housing,
healthcare)N/A
positive outcomes of military service or post-
traumatic growthN/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014 13
AFHS (Ranch Hand)
Current Status Choices Study information
AFHS (Ranch Hand)
VA disability rating N/Apsychological well-being / distress Questions about psychoses, anxiety, depression
etc.: Statistically significant trends were observed
for sleep disorders, verified psychological
disorders, and in scores on two psychological
batteries (indicators of psychological distress and/or
dysfunction) (i.e., The Symptom Checklist-90-
Revised and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory
in Cycle 3)social well-being Questions about marital history in Cycle 1economic well-being Questions about current employment, household
income, and occupation etc.information from military or VA records? Yeshealth assessment (1=self-report, 2=biomarkers,
3=administrative data, 4=informant report,
5=other)
1
COMMENTS Summary of Epidemiologic Studies of Vietnam
Veterans HealthSee Appendix C in the IOM report (or the uploaded
document in Mlitary Life Course website)
Application process for use of AFHS
data
Access to the materials is open to qualified
researchers whose use of the AFHS assets is
deemed appropriate by an IOM committee currently
being constituted. The committee will evaluate the
scientific merit of proposals, which will also be
subject to review by the National Academies’
institutional review board. Some funding will be
available. However, this will be limited and
investigators are encouraged to seek support from
other sources.
Template v2.11 Jan2014 14
WLS
Parameters Choices Study information
Study name Wisconsin Longitudinal Study
Website http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/wlsresearch/
NIA link http://www.nia.nih.gov/ResearchInformation/Scienti
ficResources/StudyInfo.htm?id=101
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
In 1957 the state of Wisconsin simply wanted to
predict the demand for higher education among high
school seniors.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
W1: 1957 (graduates); W2: 1964 (graduates); W3:
1975 (graduates); W1': 1977 (siblings); W4: 1992-
1993 (graduates); W2': 1993-1994 (siblings); W5:
2003- 2005 (graduates and spouses); W3': 2004-
2007 (siblings and siblings' spouses); W6 & W4':
2010-2011 (graduates, siblings, and spouses)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
2 (Wisconsin high school graduates)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0 (the latest wave/wave 6 is 2010- 2011)
Birth cohort(s) 1937-1940 (73% in 1939 cohort: m=3458, f=4068)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 = longitudinal
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 2 = convenience
Selection criteria for
sample
1/3 of the 1957 high school graduates in state of WI
Open or closed to
enrollment
closed (besides the class of 1957, their parents,
spouses, siblings and their spouses were also
assessed but at different years) (With the lifespan
development of the 1957 graduates, the focus of
questionnaires changes and their siblings and
spouses are included.)
Method Telephone & mail interviews (W1-W5); in-person
interview (W6)
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 10317 m = 4991; f = 5326 (1939 cohort at W1)
Military N N (male), N (female) W2: N=4257 (m=4257, f=0); W3: N=2667 (m=2625,
f=42)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
Graduates: 8 (Cold War 1945-1960); Some of their
brothers: 4, 5
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
3: For W2 see "Job History" for the variable "mlst64:
Military service status" (coded as -3: Male
Nonrespondent or NA; -2: Inappropriate, female; 1
:Has served; 2: Has not served; 3: Now serving,
active duty; 4: Now serving, National Guard or
Reserves; 5: No Data). For W3 and W1' see
"Military" for details.
WLS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 15
WLS
Parameters Choices Study information
WLS
Ethnicity/ Race "3. Race or ethnic origin" under "Social Background"
of "2003-2005 Mailed SAQ for Graduate & Sibling
Respondents"; In "Value and attitude" ask
participants "how important your ethnic
group/nationality identity" is? (2003 - 2005
Graduates) (2004 - 2007 Selected Sibling)
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
Questions about mental illness with ICD-9 codes (in
"Health" variables)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
Other measures trauma
life events 2003-2005 (graduates) "Dealing With Problems":
including 17 potentially stressful life events/problems
and asks: (1) age at frist (or only) occurence, (2)
age at last occurrence, and (3) if event has ever
occurred, as well as a summery variable (4).
coping 1. About stress and personality: ex: W4 "Personality;
Neuroticism" (To what extent do you see yourself as
someone who is relaxed and handles stress well?);
2. Strategies: make it positive; keep mind off; etc:
ex: W4: handle stress well; family stress spills to
work; work stress spills to family; W5: coping of
stressful event strategies (id101rer-118rer)
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
W3: "Military" (training etc.)
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support W4, W5: "Social and Civic Participation" (iz005rer:
What is your level of involvement with veterans’
organizations?)
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
W4: veteran healthcare plan; policy info; W5:
"Access to Health Care and Insurance" (gs802re:
What is the name of the military or veterans
provided health insurance plan that you are covered
by?)
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
W1: "Aspirations" (milplnq: How has the prospect of
military serivce influenced your plans?); use of
military training in subsequent jobs
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress W4. W5 & W2': "Depression" (psychological
distress/depression - modified CES-D; Hostility
index); "Psychological well-being" (autonomy,
environmental mastery; relations; purpose in life;
Brandstadter flexible goal adjustment (FGA) scale
etc.) (W4:rn001- 023 & mn001-066), (W5: gn101 -
133; optimism (in070rec); environmental mastery
(in010rei); mattering index (in072rec)); "Depression
and Alcohol Summary";
Template v2.11 Jan2014 16
WLS
Parameters Choices Study information
WLS
social well-being W4 & W2': "Social Participation"; W5: "social
relationships"; relation to others (in028rec) social
particiipation: social identity (work(in501),
volunteer(in504), organization(in505), ethnicity
(in507) family(in503); religious in502))relatives
organizations
economic well-being Variables including "employment" "pensions" "other
income" "assets" "intertransfers"
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
(av005sp)1: W4 & W2': "Health (143 questions)";
W5 & W3': first phone interview besides mail
(including general self-reported health, the Health
Utilities Index-Mark 3, specific illnesses and details
regarding long-term care);
Template v2.11 Jan2014 17
NAS
Parameters Choices Study information
Study name Normative Aging Study
Website N/A
NIA link N/A
Study goals
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1961-70 enrollment; ongoing
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
3 = local (orignally located in Greater Boston)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0 = ongoing data collection
Birth cohort(s) 1885 - 1945
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 = longitudinal
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 2 = convenience
Selection criteria for
sample
healthy (no chronic disease), family ties in Boston
area, intention to remain in Boston
Open or closed to
enrollment
closed panel
Method
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 2280 men; 0 women
Military N N (male), N (female) 1381 men; 0 women
Era/Theater 1=Civil War 2=WW I 3=WWII
4=Korea 5=Vietnam 6=Persian
Gulf/ODS 7=OIF/OEF 8=Peacetime
9=Other
3, 4, 5 (a few)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1, 2, 3
Ethnicity/ Race
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (Have you ever been
diagnosed with/treated for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
2.4 (subset about 400 completed CAPS)
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
3.1, 3.2, 3.3 (subset about 650)
Other measures trauma about 650 did Brief Trauma Inventory
life events ELSI repeated measures since 1985
coping Ways of coping; Brief Ways of Coping, California
Coping Inventory (all repeated 2 or more times)
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
Elder & Clipp measure
homecoming yes
unit cohesion/social support yes
prisoner of war status yes (single item)
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
single items
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating yes (at study entry); also 1990 military survey
psychological well-being life satisfaction, Ryff positive well-being, happiness
ladder
social well-being
economic well-being income
information from military or VA records? N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=other)
1 (report of diagnosis; SF-36), 2 (multiple measures
since 1961 of multiple markers)
NAS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 18
NAS
Parameters Choices Study information
NAS
COMMENTS data are not publicly available. Contact
investigators for further information
Template v2.11 Jan2014 19
PSID
Parameters Choices Study information
Study name Panel Study of Income Dynamics
Website http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/
NIA link N/A
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The PSID gathers data on the family as a whole and
on individuals residing within the family for over 40
years since 1968. It emphasizes the dynamic and
interactive aspects of family economics,
demography, and health. It is one of the life course
and multigenerational research projects.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1968- 2011 (data were collected annually 1968-
1997 and biennially after 1997)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1, oversample on low-income families to investigate
closely on poverty related issues.
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0 (The next collection year will be 2011)
Birth cohort(s) Age ragne at enrollment was 1-125, i.e. cohort was
between 1843 and 1967.
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1=the longest running longitudinal household survey
in the world [PSID Family-level, PSID Individual-
level, CDS and TA (TA was from 2005) (including
Time Diary Aggregates), CDS Time Diaries, and
Disability and Use of Time Study (DUST) (from
2009)]
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1= nationally representative
Selection criteria for
sample
The PSID was originally designed to study the
dynamics of income and poverty. Thus, the original
1968 PSID sample was drawn from two
independent samples: an over-sample of 1,872 low
income families from the Survey of Economic
Opportunity (the “SEO sample”) and a nationally
representative sample of 2,930 families designed by
the Survey Research Center at the University of
Michigan (the “SRC sample”).
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed to enrollment and following the base family
members and their offspring, as well as launching
different projects from the PSID data.
Method Interview
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) Started with 4802 families (N=18230) in 1968 as
index families, now in 2011 has 8690 families
(N=70,000 individuals) (Due to the natural increases
of family members, the sample was strategically
reduced in 1997)
Military N N (male), N (female) T1 1985 survey N=1905 (27%- 29.6%)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
2: 6; 8: 28 (1920s-1930s); 3: 454; 8: 43 (1940s); 4:
223; 8: 136 (1955- 1960); 5: 764; 8: 216 (1976-
1985); 7: 35 (1998-1999) [included only the index
families, based on 1985 Excel data file]
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1 (self report in Main Questionnaire/ PSID Main
Family Data: are you (HEAD) a veteran?)
PSID
Template v2.11 Jan2014 20
PSID
Parameters Choices Study information
PSID
Ethnicity/ Race Self-reported question (Since in 1973 most
interviews were taken by telephone this variable was
copied from 1972 data; splitoff's race was assumed
to be the same as that of their main families'.), 1985
new data on race (G31, G32); the following years:
N31, N32, K18, K19, L31, L32, K39-K41, L39-L41
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A, ICD-10 or 9 codes were used for mortality,
DSM codes were for mental health, such as
depression, but not PTSD. Participants could specify
in the column of "others".
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
H5L. (Has a doctor or other health professional
EVER told [you / HEAD / WIFE/“WIFE”] that [you /
he / she] had …) Any emotional, nervous, or
psychiatric problems?
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
from 0.02% (1986) to 0.25% using GI Bill benefits
(2009). Some variables include A19 Housing:
whether living in government-provided housing;
Variables G37-G43: Veteran Pensions, Insurances
etc. G83, 84; R29; H61 (refer to main questionnaire
2011). G37A. Did [you / HEAD] receive any income
in [PYEAR] from the Veteran's Administration for a
servicemen's, widow's, or survivor's pension, service
disability, or the GI bill?
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress Several psycho-social variables are asked of the
heads and wives of each houshold, including overall
life satisfaction, 30-day depression/anxiety (K6 short
screening scale), 12-mo. major depression screener
(from the Composite International Diagnostic
Interview)
social well-being Behavior problems, self-esteem, risky behaviors and
thrill-seeking, anti-social behaviors, drugs and
alcohol, parental control and acceptance etc. (An
excel file of psychological and social well-being data
is attached)
economic well-being Income, wages and wealth
information from military or VA
records?
N/A (most of them were self-reported)
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1,3 (An excel file of health measures data is
attached)
COMMENTS One can create a customized codebook and data depending on the research interest: for
Template v2.11 Jan2014 21
PSID
Parameters Choices Study information
PSID
Descriptions about study topics http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/Guide/default.aspx
PSID-HRS Cross-walk http://simba.isr.umich.edu/data/PSIDHRS/AboutXW
alk.aspx
NSF Funding http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id
=13460
National sample on exploring three
major aspects: the child development
supplement (CDS), data on health and
aging, disability and use of time,
transition into adulthood (TA)
http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/Guide/documents.asp
x
Cross-year data index, such as
veterans and health etc.
http://simba.isr.umich.edu/VS/i.aspx
Template v2.11 Jan2014 22
PSID-TA
Parameters Choices Study information
Study name PSID- Transition into Adulthood (TA)
Website http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/
NIA link N/A
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
This study was designed to collect information from
all children who had participated in the Child
Development Supplement who had turned age 18
and had completed high school and had families still
active in PSID.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing) 2005, 2007, 2009 (2009 data is not available online)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international 1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0 (The next collection year will be 2011)
Birth cohort(s) 1987- (children of the PSID index family, who are
aged 18 and older in 2005)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other 1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample offspring from the index family of PSID study
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed to enrollment and following the base family
members and their offspring, as well as launching
different projects from the PSID data.
Method 44-minute computer assisted telephone interview
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) N=745
Military N N (male), N (female) 2005 current serving in army N=15; 2007 N=26
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
7: 15 (2005); 26 (2007)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
3 (Variables from 2005: TA050395 to TA050410;
2007: TA070369-TA070384; see comments for
details)
Ethnicity/ Race
2005, 2007 data: A11B WTR IN SOCIAL ACTION
GROUPS; K3 ETHNIC GROUP; K3 NATIONALITY
MENTION; K3 NATIONALITY MENTION 2-HD; L6
HISPANICITY; L7 RACE MENTION #1-#3; L8
IMPORTANCE OF ETHNIC GROUP IDENTITY
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A (mainly depression, anxiety etc., see the column
of "Psychological wellbeing)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other) N/A
PSID- TA
Template v2.11 Jan2014 23
PSID-TA
Parameters Choices Study information
PSID- TA
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
4: The K6 non-specific psychological distress scale
(TA050938) developed by Dr. Ronald Kessler,
Professor of Healthcare Policy at Harvard Medical
School, for use in the
National Health Interview Survey. The remaining
scale (TA050939) sums six questions from the 1997
National Longitudinal Survey of Youth regarding
risky behaviors.
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
Expectations about military training (2005:
TA050395 to TA050410; 2007: TA070369-
TA070384; see comments for details)
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N=2- based on 2007 TA data: TA070237 "E30G
WTR HEALTH INS MILITARY/VA" (E30g. What
kind of health insurance or health care coverage do
you have? --MILITARY HEALTH CARE/VA)
Health Insurance related questions: TA070223-
TA070241; TA070641 (2007)
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress
Psychological and Social Well-being: Flourishing
scale (TA050934) and three subscales, emotional,
social and psychological well-being (TA050935-
TA050937: self-confidence; social integration; social
identity; depression; worry; social anxiety; binge
eating; thrill seeking behaviors; experiences of
abuse; use of drugs and alcohol; experiences with
illegal activities, arrests, and incarcerations.
social well-being (included in the "psychological and social well-being
domain)
economic well-being
"Income & Wealth": Income from transfer and asset
income; financial assistance from parents and other
relatives; value of personal vehicles, stocks,
mutual funds, other investments, checking and
savings accounts; credit card and student loan
debt."Work & Wages"
information from military or VA
records? N/A (most of them were self-reported)
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1,3 (An excel file of health measures data is
attached)
COMMENTShttp://simba.isr.umich.edu/VS/i.aspx
TA050395 E71 WTR IN ARMED FORCES OR ROTC NOW
Template v2.11 Jan2014 24
HRS
Parameters Choices Study information
Study name Health and Retirement Study
Website http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/
NIA link N/A
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
the HRS will provide a long-term source of data on
the transition from middle age to the initial stages of
retirement and beyond.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1992- 2010 (every 2-year, 10 waves so far)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0 (HRS data collection path :
http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=dflow)
Birth cohort(s) The first cohort is 1931-1941. For practical reasons,
new cohorts will be added every six years rather
than at each wave (every two years). The second
cohort is 1953 and before (enrolled in the 2004
wave). in the 2010 wave, the mid-baby boom cohort
(born 1954-1959) is added, and in 2016 the late
baby boom cohort (born 1960-1965) is scheduled to
be added. (useful for checking entry data etc.
http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=avail)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (Follows individuals and their spousesfrom the
time of their entry since 1992 into the survey until
death)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1 (nationally representative of the population over
age 50)
Selection criteria for
sample
An individual either was born in the cohort range
1931-41, or was coupled with an individual born in
that range.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Open/Closed: Introducing a new 6-year cohort of
participants every 6 years
Method Interview (Questionnaire and raters' notes) (The
allocation of interview time by broad topic: Health
40%, Family 19%, Economics 41%)
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 15,497 (in 1992) (for detail:
http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/samplerespon
se.pdf)
Military N N (male), N (female) N=3356 (info from codebook 1992:
http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/modules/meta/1992/co
re/codebook/05_a.htm); N=2624 (from online data
1992 HRS (Final) (v.2.0))
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
3: 258; 4: 756; 5: 308; 6:11; 8: 5 (1937-1940), 149
(1946-1950), 609(1955-1960), 35 (1976-1990); N/A:
493- [included only the index families, based on
1992 HRS (Final) (v.2.0)]
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1, 2 (2006 Variable KLB037C: Q37C. FIRE A
WEAPON IN COMBAT; What year?); 3 (During
what years were you in active service?)
HRS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 25
HRS
Parameters Choices Study information
HRS
Ethnicity/Race (1992) A7 Do you consider yourself Hispanic or
Latino? A7a. Would you say you are Mexican
American, Puerto Rican, Cuban or something
else? [CHECK ALL THAT APPLY.]; A8. Do you
consider yourself primarily white or Caucasian,
Black or African
American, American Indian, or Asian?
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
Not specifically asked about PTSD but general
emotional health: V423, V424, V425 (psycho-social
data were collected since 2004)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
4: The Shortened CES-D 4
Summary & The Short Form Composite
International Diagnostic Interview
(CIDI-SF); Self-Rated Emotional Health
Other measures trauma Q.37 Lifetime Traumas (2006);Q.27 (2004)
(adapted from Krause, et al., 2004)
life events Q. 38 Stressful Life Events (2006); Q. 28 (2004)
(from Turner et al., 1995)
coping Q. 22-23 Sense of Control (2006) (based on the
Midlife Developmental Inventory (MIDI))
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support Q1 Social Participation; Q2 Social Integration (2004,
2006); Social Support Q. 4 – Q. 18 (2006), Q. 7 –
Q. 21 (2004); Q21 (2006) Neighborhood
Disorder/Neighborhood Social Cohesion
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
1992 Questions: R2 (Are you currently covered by
any federal government health insurance programs,
such as Medicare, Medicaid, or CHAMPUS, VA, or
other military programs?), R20 (Is your
(husband/wife/partner) currently covered by any
government health insurance programs)
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating (1992) J126. Have you ever applied for disability
benefits from the Veterans
Administration?
psychological well-being / distress Q. 35 Psychological Well-Being (2006), Q6 (2004);
Q. 41 Anxiety (2006);Q. 42 Anger (2006);
social well-being Ryff's psychological measures etc.
http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/HRS20
06LBQscale.pdf (face-to-face questionnaire since
1992, "leave-behind" Lifestyle Questionnaire since
2004)
Template v2.11 Jan2014 26
HRS
Parameters Choices Study information
HRS
economic well-being Various measurements of wealth: income, work,
assets, pension plans, health insurance, health care
expenditures, occupation, and social security
administration data etc.
http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=avail; also
see HRS (years) Core Income and Wealth
Imputations (RAND)
information from military or VA
records?
HRS 2006 Core Income and Wealth Imputations
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (since 1992); 2 (since 2006 including biomarker
data
http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=shoavail&
iyear=75)
COMMENTS
Questionnaires and years of collection http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=qnaires
How to use the site http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=howsite
User Guide http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/dmgt/IntroUse
rGuide.pdf
Merge-cross reference http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/rda/xref4.html
Online Concordance http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=concord
RAND http://www.rand.org/labor/aging/dataprod.html
Wilmoth, London & Parker (2010)
Military Service and Men's Health
Trajectories in Later Life
http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/conte
nt/65B/6/744.short
The aging, Demographics, and memory study (ADAMS), a supplement to the HRS, is the
Template v2.11 Jan2014 27
MIDUS I
Parameters Choices Study information
Study name Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) (MIDUS was
first conducted by the John D. and Catherine T.
MacArthur Foundation in 1994/1995)
Website http://www.midus.wisc.edu/
NIA link http://aging.wisc.edu/research/midus.php (MIDUS II
was funded by NIA in 2002)
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
interdisciplinary research: to identify the major
biomedical, psychological, and social factors that
permit some people to achieve good health,
psychological well-being, and social responsiblity
during their adult years
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1995-1996, 2004-2006 (see MIDUS II), ongoing (3rd
wave is planning)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1920s-1970s
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (two waves around 10 years apart)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
a nationally representative random-digit-dial sample
of noninstitutionalized, English-speaking adults,
aged 25 to 74, selected from working telephone
banks in the coterminous United States.
Open or closed to
enrollment
closed
Method each has a telephone interview (30 minutes) and
two mail questionnaires (additional two hours)
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 7189 (the MIDUS I core sample (N = 3,485),
metropolitan over-samples (N = 757), twins (N =
998 pairs), and siblings (N = 951) of core
respondents. ) (for details:
http://www.midus.wisc.edu/midus1/samples.php)
Military N N (male), N (female) N=563 (from OPERAT_R: RESP CUR
OPERATOR, LABORER, MILITARY); Spouse
N=554 (from OPERAT_S S/P operator, laborer,
military)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A (not specified)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1 (based on "Veteran benefits")
Ethnicity/ Race A1SS7: Race; A1SS2: Best country of ethnic origin
(plus there are some ethnic attitude questions)
MIDUS I
Template v2.11 Jan2014 28
MIDUS I
Parameters Choices Study information
MIDUS I
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping Sense of Control (SAQ, F1s – F1dd) & Religiosity
(SAQ, R2a – R2i, R5 – R6): Religious/Spiritual
Coping
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support Seeking Social Support (SAQ, F3ee – F3kk) &
Social Support (SAQ, K10a – K16d)
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
Government insurance N=246 (from A1SC1H: Gov
military, Taken from: MIDUS,1995-1996 - Main,
Siblings and Twin Data), Eligible N=366 (from
A1SC4C), Spouse/partner N=200 (from A1SC5H)
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress six dimensions (Ryff, 1989) (from SAQ, F1a – F1r)
social well-being SAQ, Section K: Community Involvement (K17a –
K17o)
economic well-being SAQ, Section I: Work and J: Finances
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (for oneself, for women, for one's parents, and
health insurance)
COMMENTS
MacArthur Midlife Study (MIDMAC) http://midmac.med.harvard.edu/
ICPSR link for dataset http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/
203
The 1st wave (MIDUS I) in 1995: a general population survey, surveys of their siblings, and a
Template v2.11 Jan2014 29
MIDUS II
Parameters Choices Study information
Study name Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) (MIDUS II was
funded by NIA in 2002)
Website http://www.midus.wisc.edu/
NIA link http://aging.wisc.edu/research/midus.php
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The samples were from the MIDUS I. To add
refinements to MIDUS II, an African American
sample (N = 592) was recruited from Milwaukee,
Wisconsin. Besides the MIDUS follow-up project,
MIDUS II has 4 other projects: neuroscience,
biomarker, cognitive, and daily stress projects.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
2004-2006, ongoing (3rd wave is planning)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1920s-1970s
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (two waves around 10 years apart)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1, 3 (oversampled a group of African Americans in
Milwaukee)
Selection criteria for
sample
The MIDUS II respondents were from MIDUS I, who
were 35 to 86 years of age.
Open or closed to
enrollment
closed
Method Among 4,963 from MIDUS I were successfully
contacted for a 30-min phone interview. MIDUS II
also included two self-administered questionnaires
(SAQs), each of about 55 pages in length, which
were mailed to participants. The overall response
rate for the SAQs was 81%.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) Project1: 4963 (MIDUS I follow-up sample)+ 592
(oversampled)= 5555 (Different sample N for
Project 1- 5, see
http://www.midus.wisc.edu/midus2/)
Military N N (male), N (female) N=249 (current occupation)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A (not specified)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1 (based on "Veteran benefits")
Ethnicity/ Race B1PF2AO: OS- Other ethnic group #1 - B1PF2DO:
group #4 (plus there are some ethnic/ race
discrimination questions)
MIDUS II
Template v2.11 Jan2014 30
MIDUS II
Parameters Choices Study information
MIDUS II
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
Not for the veterans but for their children (from
variable "B1PCDT1 Conditn dis or ment
prob:Child/HH member #1"- 659
POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDERS (PTSD)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping questions about how to cope with stressful events
(including variables such as B1SE13A to B1SE13Z);
many other questions about coping: B1SREINT
Positive Reinterpretation (Prob Coping); B1SACTIV
Active Coping (Prob Focused Coping); B1SPLAN
Planning (Problem Focused Coping); B1SVENT
Venting of Emotion (Emotion Coping); B1SDENIA
Denial (Emotion Focused Coping); B1SDISEN
Behavioral Disengagement (Prob Coping);
B1SFDCOP Use Food to Cope); B1SPRCOP
Problem Focused Coping; B1SEMCOP Emotion
Focused Coping)
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A, but some variables about "whether to attend
xxx support group"
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N=129 (B1SG11I: Veterans' benefits) (see also
B1SC3H R: Military provides health insurance;
B1SC9H )
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress main survey: B1SPWBA1,2 Autonomy,
B1SPWBE1,2 Environmental Mastery,
B1SPWBG1,2 Personal Growth, B1SPWBR1,2
Positive relations with othersB1SPWBU1,2 Purpose
in Life, B1SPWBS1,2 Self Acceptance; and
Neuroscience Project
social well-being B1SSWBMS Meaningfulness of Society;
B1SSWBSI Social Integration; B1SSWBAO
Acceptance of Others; B1SSWBSC Social
Contribution; B1SSWBSA Social Actualization
economic well-being N/A
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
2 (biomarker project)
COMMENTS
MacArthur Midlife Study (MIDMAC) http://midmac.med.harvard.edu/
ICPSR link http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/
203
Template v2.11 Jan2014 31
NHATS
Parameters Choices Study information
Study name National Health and Aging Trend Study (NHATS)
Website http://www.nhats.org/scripts/conDocDCI.htm
NIA link N/A
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
To promote scientific study of late-life disability
trends and dynamics; and to advance our
understanding of the social and economic impact of
late-life functional changes for older people, their
families, and society.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
About 9,000 people will participate in the first wave
of NHATS from May 2011. The first data release is
anticipated in Spring 2012. The study team is
currently calling for Modules for NHATS 2012
(Round 2).
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
3 (starting in summer 2011)
Birth cohort(s) 1900s-1945
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1 (a nationally representative sample of Medicare
beneficiaries)
Selection criteria for
sample
NHATS participants are drawn from the list of all
Medicare enrollees in the U.S. who are age 65 or
older. Persons were selected from all age groups
from the youngest (65 to 69) to the oldest (90 or
older). The NHATS sample design is age-stratified
so that persons are selected from 5 year age groups
between the ages of 65 and 90, and from among
persons age 90 and older. This design oversamples
persons at older age groups. Persons whose race is
listed as Black on the CMS enrollment file are
oversampled as well. Replenishment of the sample
to maintain its ability to represent the older Medicare
population is planned at 5 year intervals.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Open
Method The first wave of NHATS will consist of an interview
conducted in the study participant's home that
involves answering questions and doing simple
activities such as walking and standing. Participants
will be interviewed every year. Two other data
collection instruments are used. One is the
Performance Activities Booklet which is used to
record results of the physical performance activities.
The other is the Facility Questionnaire (FQ) which is
administered to a staff person when a sample
person resides in a residential care setting, including
a nursing home.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) (ongoing data collection)
Military N N (male), N (female) (ongoing data collection)
NHATS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 32
NHATS
Parameters Choices Study information
NHATS
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
(ongoing data collection)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1: Section VA [VETERAN'S STATUS] 3 items,
including VA1: Did {you/SP} ever serve on active
duty in the Armed Forces of the United States?;
VA2: When did {you/SP} serve on active duty in the
U.S. Armed Forces? VA3: {Were you/Was SP} ever
an active member of a National Guard or military
reserve unit?
Ethnicity/ Race Race, Ethnicity, and Language (RL)
Race
Hispanic Ethnicity
Language other than English
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A but questions about depression and anxiety
(see HC 19)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A, but "Income and Asset (IA)" includes info from
Veteran's Administration. Also see the Section EW.
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress (General) Section WB [Well-Being and Age Identity
(WB)] 4 items. These items draw on similar items
from MIDUS (Midlife in the U.S.; data and
documentation at ICPSR)
social well-being Section SN [SOCIAL NETWORK] 8 items
economic well-being Section EW [ECONOMIC WELL-BEING] 15 items.
This Section asks about some types of debt,
financial gifts from sample persons to relatives and
from relatives to sample persons, and participation
in government assistance programs.
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
Section HC [HEALTH CONDITIONS] 22 items
Template v2.11 Jan2014 33
NHATS
Parameters Choices Study information
NHATS
COMMENTS
First wave survey content http://www.nhats.org/scripts/conDocDCI.htm
The Round 1 beta release public use
files now available (updated
2012/06/08)
http://www.nhats.org/
Second round of data recently releated
(Dec 2013)
It will also support investigations of how individuals adapt to changes in physical, cognitive,
and sensory capacity and the consequences of disablement for wellbeing. An overview of the
NHATS conceptual framework can be found in Vicki Freedman's 2009 article, "Adopting the
ICF Language for Studying Late-life Disability: A Field of Dreams?" in the Journals of
Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 64A: 1172-1174.
Template v2.11 Jan2014 34
CDC VES
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name CDC-Vietnam Experience Study (VES)
Website http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/veterans/default1c.htm
NIA link N/A
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
In response to veterans' concerns about their own
health and their children's, the Vietnam Experience
Study was a multidimensional assessment of the
health of Vietnam veterans.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1985-1986 (telephone interview), followed by sub-
sampling detailed examinations (1985-1986)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1937-44 (N=999), 1945-49 (N=5896), 1950-54
(N=1029) (non-veteran samples had similar
characteristics)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
0
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
Only the veterans meeting the following criteria were
eligible for random selection into the study: U.S.
Army veterans, Military occupational specialty
(MOS), Single term of enlistment, Minimum of 16
weeks of active duty time, Pay grade E-1 to E-5 at
discharge, Entered military service for the first time
during 1965- 1971
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method mortality assessment, telephone interview, medical
and psychological examination, and a reproductive
outcome assessment
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) Only men: From a random sample of enlisted men
who entered the U.S. Army from 1965 to 1971,
7,924 Vietnam and 7364 non-Vietnam veterans
participated in a telephone interview. A random
subsample of 2,490 Vietnam and 1,972 non-
Vietnam veterans also underwent a comprehensive
health examination, including medical examination,
laboratory tests, and a psychological evaluation.
(See Figure 1 in Synopsis 1of4)
Military N N (male), N (female) 7924 (telephone interview), 2490 (other detailed
examinations)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
5 (analyzed with two groups depending on the entry
year: 1965-1967 vs. 1968-1971)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1& 2
CDC VES
Template v2.11 Jan2014 35
CDC VES
Current Status Choices Study information
CDC VES
Ethnicity/ Race Race (White, Black and Hispanic & Other) (in
Personal Characteristics)
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
1 (for details, see Telephone interview 1_8, Table
61)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
2: 2DIS version 3A (among N=2490, 14.7% ever
diagnosed, 2.2% one month before the exam)
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
3: 2MMPI: 14.7% reported ever having PTSD
symptoms. Symptoms compatible with PTSD were
more likely to be reported
by men who served in Vietnam after 1967 than by
those who were there before that time.
Other measures trauma Combat Exposure Index score
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
self-reported herbicide exposure--> postservice
disease and symptoms, more adverse reproductive
and child health outcomes
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support The effects of combat on the long-term health of
Vietnam veterans was assessed by using
dichotomous classifications of duty MOS (tactical,
nontactical) and type of unit
(combat, support) and an index based on self-
reported combat experiences (see
Telephone_interview_6of8).
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress Psychosocial measures, such as depression, anxiety
etc.
social well-being N/A
economic well-being Income levels
information from military or VA
records?
1. Duty military occupational specialty (duty MOS)
2. Type of unit
3. Midpoint of tour of duty in Vietnam
(for details, see Telephone interview 1of8, Appendix
E)
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1: health status, post-discharge of health problems,
dermatologic conditions, cardiorespiratory
conditions, neurologic conditions,
neuropsychological tests, immune functional assays,
3: ICD-9 codes by Medical Reason
COMMENTS Vietnam veterans had statistically significant effect than non-veterans, including neurological
symptoms, current use of marijuana, and symptoms compatible with PTSD.
Template v2.11 Jan2014 36
CDC VES
Current Status Choices Study information
CDC VES
Where to find data? http://www.archives.gov/research/arc/ --> Search
"Vietnam Experience Study". These records are not
available at present for online downloading. You
may obtain copies of the public use versions on
removable media (CD-R or DVD) for a cost-
recovery fee. Details on ordering electronic records,
including the available media and technical
specifications, may be found at
http://www.archives.gov/research/order/electronic-
records.html
Template v2.11 Jan2014 37
BLSA
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA)
Website http://www.blsa.nih.gov/
NIA link http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00233272
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) is
a multidisciplinary observational study of the
physiological and psychological aspects of human
aging and diseases and conditions that increase with
age. Information from the BLSA may help to define
strategies to improve quality of life in old age and
prevent and delay loss of independence. The goals
of the BLSA are: 1) the description of the
anatomical, physiological and functional changes
that occur over the aging process; 2) the
identification of the biological, behavioral and
environmental factors that account for these
changes; 3) the identification of the biological and
physiological pathways that lead to frailty in older
persons; 4) the study of factors that predict healthy
aging and health-related outcomes across the life-
span; 5) the development of hypotheses concerning
possible targets for interventions that may positively
affect several aspects of the aging process and
prevent age-related diseases.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
Began in 1958. Data are collected on participants
every two years. The BLSA Women’s
Program was initiated in 1978. It is an ongoing study
until December 2016, which will be the final data
collection date for primary outcome measure. Study
timeline:
http://www.grc.nia.nih.gov/branches/blsa/timeline.ht
ml
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0
Birth cohort(s) Ideal 1970's
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
20-years-old and over, in good healthy (no
established genetic diseases etc.) (for details, see
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00233272
Open or closed to
enrollment
Open, currently recruiting healthy adults over age 70
BLSA
Template v2.11 Jan2014
BLSA
Current Status Choices Study information
BLSA
Method Volunteers participate in more than 100
physiological assessments intended to yield a
scientific understanding of the processes in human
ageing. Data is also collected via self-completed
questionnaires (e.g. Demographics, Physical
Activity, Pulmonary Disease and Activities and
Attitudes) and personal interviews (e.g. Diet
Interview and Autopsy Study Interview).
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) Over 1,200 men and women ranging in age from
their 20s to their 90s.
Military N N (male), N (female) Veterans' Organization (see "Activities and Attitudes
Questionnaire"):
http://blswww.grc.nia.nih.gov/i501/c03/e5010361.ht
m
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
Veterans' Organization (one Component of Activities
and Attitudes Quest.)
Ethnicity/ Race Race (0:White 1:Black 2:Others) (one Component
of Activities and Attitudes Quest.)
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A (focusing mainly on physical health related
medical records data)
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress Components of Activities and Attitudes Quest., such
as "Perfectly Satisfied With Health"
social well-being Components of Activites and Attitudes Quest.
economic well-being Income
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014
BLSA
Current Status Choices Study information
BLSA
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (B-1: (How Would You Rate Your Health...) in
Activities and Attitudes Quest); 5 (Many other tests,
including Basal Metabolism, Body Composition,
Blood Pressure Analysis, Bone Data,
Cerebrovascular Disease
, Cornell Medical Index, Abbreviated Genetics
Survey etc.)
COMMENTS Session3: how to access the data http://blswww.grc.nia.nih.gov/cblsads1.htm#c3
Army Alpha Examination An intelligence test for recruits
National Institute on Aging, BLSA 25th
Anniversary
http://www.grc.nia.nih.gov/branches/blsa/blsa25a.ht
m
Template v2.11 Jan2014
NLS- Older men
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name National Longitudinal Surveys (NLS)- Older
men
Website http://www.bls.gov/nls/oldyoungmen.htm
NIA link N/A
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The primary purpose of the NLS is to collect
data on the labor force experiences of adults
and young adults. In addition, the surveys have
regularly gathered information about a range of
factors potentially affecting labor market
attachment, including investments in education
and training, geographic region of residence,
the influence of parents, marital status and
family responsibilities, socioeconomic status,
work-related attitudes and aspirations, health
problems, and job discrimination.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1966- 1990
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1 (The U.S. Census Bureau established the two
cohorts of men through two household
screenings, NLS older men and young men.)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1 (closed in 1990)
Birth cohort(s) 1907-1921 (N=5,020 aged 45-59 in 1966)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (three surveys, two cohorts)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
Each sample group served to represent the
civilian, noninstitutionalized population of men
in the same age group residing in the United
States at the time the samples were selected.
Black Americans were to be represented in the
sample at twice their expected rate in the
population.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed in 1966
Method Interviews: Respondents in the Older Men
cohort completed 12 interviews from 1966
through 1983 and an additional interview
sponsored by the National Institute on Aging in
1990. Interviewers from the Census Bureau
conducted all of the surveys.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) N=5020 (men)
Military N N (male), N (female) 1 YES (N= 1,962); 0 NO (N=2,741); NA
(N=331)
NLS- Older men
Template v2.11 Jan2014 41
NLS- Older men
Current Status Choices Study information
NLS- Older men
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
1967 Survey (R00841.00) WHEN DID R
SERVE IN ARMED FORCES? 4 (N=27); 3
(N=1822); 4+3 (N=33); 8 (After Jan. 1955)
(N=4); 8 (After Jan. 1955) +3 (N=4); 8 (After
Jan. 1955) +3+4 (N=6); 8 (Before June 1960)
(N=42); 8 (Before June 1960)+ 3 (N=9); 8
(Before June 1960)+ 3+4 (N=2); 8( (Before
June 1960) (After Jan. 1955)+ 3+4 (N=23)
NOTE: NO OTHER COMBINATION
OCCURS; NA (N= 3,062)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
1, 2, 3 (see Military Experiences for more
details) (1976 surveys asked whether a
respondent had ever served in the Armed
Forces. Those who had served provided
information on the general period(s) of service
(for example, during World War II, peacetime
before 1950) in the 1967 survey; the 1976
survey gathered start and stop dates for up to
two periods of active duty. The initial survey
collected information on the respondent’s
participation in vocational training while in the
Armed Forces. The final four surveys of the
Older Men asked about income from Armed
Forces pensions.)
Ethnicity/ Race Nonblack (N=3600) and Blacks (N=1420) in
1966
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014 42
NLS- Older men
Current Status Choices Study information
NLS- Older men
psychological well-being / distress Section I. Attitudes/perspectives (including the
CES-D Scale (Radloff, 1977), the Internal-
External Locus of Control Scale (Rotter, 1966),
the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire
(Pfeiffer, 1975), and the Bradburn Affect
Balance Scale (Bradburn, 1969). Periodic
questions also investigated
the respondent’s attitude toward his current job,
women working, various life events, and life in
general.
social well-being N/A
economic well-being Section G. Financial characteristics (many
variables but the variable "Evaluation of overall
financial situation" was only conducted in 1990)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1= Section E. Health and physical condition
(This data collection includes information on
the respondent’s health status, perceived
changes in his health over time, types of health-
related problems and specific health conditions
he has experienced, hospitalizations or medical
care he has received, and characteristics of his
health insurance coverage. Respondents also
stated whether their health limited or prohibited
working and whether any health problems were
the result of work-related accidents.)
COMMENTS Data access https://www.nlsinfo.org/investigator/pages/login.
jsp
There are 7 cohorts that make up the
National Longitudinal Surveys:
NLSY97, NLSY79 and children,
Mature Women, Young Women,
Older Men, and Young Men. They are
a set of surveys designed to gather
information at multiple points in time
on the labor market experiences of
groups of men and women.
For details, see the NLS Handbook
http://www.bls.gov/nls/handbook/2005/nlshc1.p
df
Template v2.11 Jan2014 43
NLS- Young men
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name National Longitudinal Surveys (NLS)- Younger Men
Website http://www.bls.gov/nls/oldyoungmen.htm
NIA link N/A
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The primary purpose of the NLS is to collect data on
the labor force experiences of adults and young
adults. In addition, the surveys have regularly
gathered information about a range of factors
potentially affecting labor market attachment,
including investments in education and training,
geographic region of residence, the influence of
parents, marital status and family responsibilities,
socioeconomic status, work-related attitudes and
aspirations, health problems, and job discrimination.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1966-1981
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1 (closed in 1990)
Birth cohort(s) 1942- 1952 (N=5225 aged 14-24 in 1966)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (three surveys, two cohorts)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
Each sample group served to represent the civilian,
noninstitutionalized population of men in the same
age group residing in the United States at the time
the samples were selected. Black Americans were
to be represented in the sample at twice their
expected rate in the population.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed in 1966
Method Interviews: The Young Men cohort participated in 12
surveys from 1966 through 1981. Interviewers from
the Census Bureau conducted all of the surveys.
Interviewers administered eight surveys in person
and conducted four by telephone.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) N= 5225 (men)
Military N N (male), N (female) 1966 Survey: Q17 (R00091.00) HAS R EVER
SERVED IN THE ARMED FORCES?
97 1 YES, NAVY
230 2 YES, ARMY
61 3 YES, AIR FORCE
34 4 YES, MARINES
5 5 YES, COAST GUARD
4,596 6 NO, DID NOT SERVE
202 NA
NLS- Young men
Template v2.11 Jan2014 44
NLS- Young men
Current Status Choices Study information
NLS- Young men
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
No specific information as in the Older men survey.
Related questions might be "MONTHS SPENT IN
ARMED FORCES", "YEAR SEPARATED FROM
ARMED FORCES (1976)". Answers are from 1959
through 1976.
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
(Multiple surveys sought information on the military
experiences of respondents in this cohort. The
survey first asked whether the respondent had ever
served in the Armed Forces. If he had, follow-up
questions determined the branch in which he served,
the rank he held, whether he had enlisted or been
drafted, and the number of months he spent on
active duty. Training questions asked about the
kinds of training he received, the length of his
training, and whether the skills he acquired were
used in a recent job. The military occupation he held
for the longest time, whether he felt that his military
service helped or hurt his career, and the date he
separated from active duty also were determined. In
addition, the 1967–71 surveys asked all age-eligible
respondents for their current draft classification and,
if applicable, the reason for their 1-Y or 4-F
rejection.)
Ethnicity/ Race Nonblack (N=3787) and Blacks (N=1438) in 1966
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
Section H: Did military service help/hurt career
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
Section H: GI (VA) benefits (ever used, type)
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
Section H: Did military service help/hurt career
VA disability rating Section H: Disability (discharged for, service-
connected, compensation rating)
Template v2.11 Jan2014 45
NLS- Young men
Current Status Choices Study information
NLS- Young men
psychological well-being / distress Section I. Attitudes/perspectives (but without CES-D
Scale as for the older men cohort) (Information from
the Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (Rotter,
1966) is available for the Young Men, as are
answers to periodic questions gathering information
about the respondent’s general knowledge of the
world of work; his educational and occupational
aspirations; and his attitudes toward his current job,
women working, and life in
general.)
social well-being N/A
economic well-being Section G. Financial characteristics (but without the
variable "Evaluation of overall financial situation" as
for the older men cohort)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1= Section E. Health and physical condition (Data
include information on perceived changes in the
respondent’s health status over time, the types of
health-related problems he experienced, whether
any of his health problems was the result of a work-
related accident, and whether he worked in an
unhealthy or dangerous environment.)
COMMENTS
Data access https://www.nlsinfo.org/investigator/pages/login.jsp
There are 7 cohorts that make up the
National Longitudinal Surveys: NLSY97,
NLSY79 and children, Mature Women,
Young Women, Older Men, and Young
Men. They are a set of surveys
designed to gather information at
multiple points in time on the labor
market experiences of groups of men
and women.
For details, see the NLS Handbook
http://www.bls.gov/nls/handbook/2005/nlshc1.pdf
In 1981 survey, there were some questions about combat experiences:
R07967.0093TWAS R EVER IN COMBAT WHEN IN ARMED FORCES?
R07968.0093UYEAR R BEGAN COMBAT IN ARMED FORCES,
R07969.0093UYEAR R ENDED COMBAT IN ARMED FORCES, R07970.0093V#
OF MONTHS R WAS IN COMBAT IN ARMED FORCES
Template v2.11 Jan2014 46
Union Army
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name “Early Indicators of Later Work Levels, Disease,and
Death” (EI)/ Union Army Study
Website http://research.chicagobooth.edu/cpe/research-
overview/research
http://www.uadata.org/
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/
9428
NIA link http://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_descriptio
n.cfm?icde=0&aid=6951333
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The data in the Union Army Data Set comprises a
portion of the historical data collected by the project
Early Indicators of Later Work Levels, Disease, and
Death (abbreviated EI), sponsored by the NIH and
NSF, under the direction of the Department of
Economics at Brigham Young University (BYU) and
processed by the Center for Population Economics
(CPE) at the University of Chicago. The goal of the
project is to construct datasets suitable for
longitudinal studies of factors affecting the aging
process from the first American cohorts who
reached age 65 in the 20th century. (for details, see
http://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_descriptio
n.cfm?aid=6951333&icde=0)
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
From 1850, 1860, 1900 and 1910 (1870 and 1880
censuses for black samples)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1=national
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
3=retrospective/ archival data
Birth cohort(s) between 1830-1847
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
5= the life-cycle data were created from linking
about a dozen national sources
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1= nationally representative of the contemporary
white male population who served in the Union Army
in the early 1860s
Selection criteria for
sample
The original plan was to draw a random sample of
39,300 recruits from the regular regiments of the
army ("Regimental Books" stored at the National
Archives inWashington, D.C.). Since that sample
produced too few black veterans, we subsequently
enlarged the sample by drawing about 6,000
veterans from the black regiments. All told, the
completed sample consists of about 45,300
observations. It takes about 15,000 variables to
describe the complete life-cycle history of each
veteran.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed (samples were compiled from several
national archival data over space and time)
Early Indicator/Union Army Study
Template v2.11 Jan2014 47
Union Army
Current Status Choices Study information
Early Indicator/Union Army Study
Method 11 databases: Censuses from 1850, 1860, 1900,
and 1910 (subsequent 6000 black samples were
added from 1870 and 1880 censuses); CMR =
carded medical records; SCRT= surgeon's
certificates; PHR = public health records; PE =
pension records; MSR = military service records; RR
= descriptive books of Union Army regiments; RH =
regimental histories
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) The approximate 39,340 individuals are a 1.6
percent random sample of all whites mustered into
the Union Army during 1861- 1865
Military N N (male), N (female) N= 39,340 (white) + 6000 (black)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
1
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
3 (the data specifically focused on veterans): date of
enlistment (early/middle/late in war)
Ethnicity/ Race Ethnicity of parents
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
Shell shock, combat fatigue, and post-traumatic
stress (all names for the same phenomenon
indifferent wars) were not recognized as disorders
during the Civil War (see Hyams, Wignall,
andRoswell 1996 for a history of PTSD) (Costa &
Kahn, 2008)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma Morbidity and mortality (from RR, MSR, CMR, PE,
RH)
-illnesses and hospitalizations (cause, treatment,
duration, outcome)
-battle injuries
-other accidents and traumas
life events Potential stress (from RR,MSR,CMR, PE, RH)
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
Postservice data- Health (PE,SCRT); occupations
and work (PE,SCRT,COO,Census 1910); personal
and family (PE, PA, Census 1900, Census 1910)
homecoming Beginning date of military duty(mildfdt1 - milfdt6);
Ending date of military duty (mildtdt1 - mildtdt6)
unit cohesion/social support An unit was considered to be more cohesive if less
diverse in ethnicity, occupation, and age (Costa &
Kahn, 2008)
prisoner of war status POW (prisoner of war) (from
RR,MSR,CMR,PE,RH) (including when, where,
duration, conditions)
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
(GI bill was not signed until 1944)
Template v2.11 Jan2014 48
Union Army
Current Status Choices Study information
Early Indicator/Union Army Study
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating PE: the amount of pension was determined by the
severity of disability and the source of disability;
Census data: recdis, hdis (1850, 1860) Disabilities;
recbnd, hbnd (1910): Blind in both eyes; recdef,
hdef (1910): Deaf and dumb.
psychological well-being / distress (from SCRT, various disease classes) n_anxous (Is
claimant anxious?); eplpsy (Does claimant
experience attacks, convulsions, epilepsy, fits,
seizures, spasms?); n_memlos (Is memory loss
present?); n_mil (Describe indications of mental
illness and or loss of mental power, including senility)
social well-being No direct variable assessed but one can create a
social network variable based on "unit cohesiveness"
(e.g. less diverse in ethnicity, occupation, and age)
(Costa & Kahn, 2008)
economic well-being Census data: Wealth Status- reclan, hlan (1850,
1860) Real estate owned; recprp, hprp (1860)
Personal property
MSR: rf_stof1 - rf_stof6; rw_ins01 - rw_ins15;
rw_ind01 - rw_ind15; rw_iqc01 - rw_iqc15;
rw_des01 - rw_des15; rw_amt01 - rw_amt15
information from military or VA
records?
MSR (also CMR; SCRT; PHR; PE; RR; RH)
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
3 (from PE,SCRT)
-testimonial history of health before pension
application
-complaints of veteran at each examination by
Pension Bureau surgeons
-health, weight, pulse, respiration, urinalysis at each
exam by
surgeons
-conditions diagnosed at each examination
-date of becoming bedridden
-dates of admission to veterans hospitals or homes
and the diagnoses on entry
-date and cause of death
COMMENTS Related studies http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/
00192/studies?archive=ICPSR&sortBy=7
Publication list (ICPSR) http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/biblio/s
eries/00192/resources?sortBy=1&archive=ICPSR
Publication list (NIH) http://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_results.cf
m?aid=6951333&icde=0
Template v2.11 Jan2014 49
LSOA
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name The 1984-1990 Longitudinal study of Aging
(LSOA)
Website http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/lsoa/lsoa1.htm
NIA link
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The Longitudinal Studies of Aging (LSOAs) is a
collaborative project of National Center for
Health Statistics (NCHS) and the National
Institute on Aging (NIA). It is a multicohort
study of persons 70 years of age and over
designed primarily to measure changes in the
health, functional status, living arrangements,
and health services utilization of two cohorts of
Americans as they move into and through the
oldest ages. The initial followup of the LSOA is
designed to providecritically needed
information on the paths from health through
functional disability to institutionalization and
death by monitoring changes in living
arrangements and functional capacity on a
continuing basis.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1984, 1986, 1988, 1900
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1= nationally-representative prospective data
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1914 and earlier
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
7,527 civilian noninstitutionalized persons 70
years of age and over at the time of their 1984
Supplement of Aging (SOA) interview
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method While the baseline interview was administered
face-to-face in the home, follow-up interviews
were administered using Computer Assisted
Telephone Interviews (CATI). All interviews
were obtained by U.S. Census Bureau
interviewers. The LSOA data file contains
information collected from multiple sources: the
1984 NHIS, the 1984 Health Insurance
Supplement, the 1984 baseline SOA and all
three followup LSOA interviews. It also includes
data from Medicare claims records, the
National Death Index, and multiple cause of
death files.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 2864 (1984 male); 4677 (1984 female)
LSOA
Template v2.11 Jan2014 50
LSOA
Current Status Choices Study information
LSOA
Military N N (male), N (female) 1984 SOA collected veteran status for all
participants 55+ rather 70+; majority of them
served in WWII
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
2, 3, 4, 5, 9
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
2= 1984 NHIS: veteran status; 1984 SOA: era
etc. (item L1)
Ethnicity/ Race 1984NHIS; 1984 SOA: L3 (6891 (White); 650
(All other))
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
ICD-9 CM code from Medicare Part A record
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
Not specifically related to GI? 1984 Health
Insurance Supplement: Receipt of Medicaid,
military retirement, Veteran’sAdministration
pensions, and eligibilityfor veterans’ medical
care and disabilitycompensation.
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating 1984 Health Insurance Supplement (NHIS):
Receipt of Medicaid, military retirement,
Veteran’sAdministration pensions, and
eligibilityfor veterans’ medical care and
disability compensation.
psychological well-being / distress see NHES and NHNES data for specific
diseases and psychological characteristics
social well-being Table XI Social Interactions in 1984 (Sr.01
Numer 28), including Satisfaction with amount
of social activity; Volunteer work in past 12
months; several activities within past 2 weeks
economic well-being Table IX Economic Indicators (see Sr.01
Numer 28); The 1984 Health Insurance
Supplement (part of NHIS)- pension from
military retirement
Template v2.11 Jan2014 51
LSOA
Current Status Choices Study information
LSOA
information from military or VA
records?
Whether/when received the Military retirement
and Veterans Administration (VA) pensions
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (SOA: health status, limitation of activity,
hospital episodes in year) (from 1984 National
Health interview Survey: Limitation of activities
(long term), Restriction of activities (2 weeks),
Bed-days (previous year and 2 weeks), Chronic
conditions and impairments (longterm), Acute
conditions (2 weeks), Doctor visits (previous
year and 2 weeks), Hospital stays and days
(previous year), Demographic characteristics)
(Supplement of Aging: Health conditions and
impairments.Activities of daily living
(ADL’s).Instrumental activities of daily living
(IADL’s).Who provided help with ADL’s and
IADL’s.Nursing home stays.Opinions about
one’s own health.Information needed for
tracking.)
COMMENTS Bibliographies based on LSOAs and
SOAs
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/lsoa/lsoa_bibliography
.htm
Template v2.11 Jan2014 52
LSOA II
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name The 1994-2000 second Longitudinal study of Aging
(LSOA II)
Website http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/lsoa/lsoa2.htm
NIA link
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The NCHS and the NIA decided to conduct the
SecondLongitudinal Study of Aging (LSOA II), ten
years after the original LSOA, with a new cohort
ofpersons age 70 years and over. Because the
LSOA II closely replicates the LSOA in
itsmethodology and content, it is uniquely poised to
provide the data necessary for analyzing important
temporal changes in health and functioning among
older Americans. Therefore, the specific aims for
LSOAII are: 1) To provide a replication of the first
LSOA in order to determine whether there have
beenchanges in the disability and impairment
process among older persons between the
1980'sand 1990's; 2) the processes by which
personal attitudes and social and community support
appear to mitigate the impact of physical
impairment; and 3) the gender andsocioeconomic
differentials in the health of older persons,
particularly the unique burden borneby elderly
women.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1994, 2000
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1924 and earlier
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (1994, 2 follw-ups in 1998, 2000)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
The LSOA II is a prospective study with a nationally
representative sample comprised of 9,447 civilian
noninstitutionalized persons 70 years of age and
over at the time of their SOA II interview. The LSOA
II followed this cohort of older persons through two
followup interviews, conducted in 1997-98 and 1999-
2000.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
LSOA II
Template v2.11 Jan2014 53
LSOA II
Current Status Choices Study information
LSOA II
Method In order to maintain comparability between this first
followup wave andbaseline and across the LSOA
and LSOA II surveys, much of the design,
methodology andprocedures implemented in these
earlier surveys has been retained. Unlike the SOA II
(conducted in person), the follow-up wave was
conducted primarily by telephone using a Computer-
Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI) system. In
addition, thefollowup interview questionnaires
included CATI and self-administered (SAQ)
versions,surviving and deceased sample person
versions, community dwelling and institutionalized
skippatterns, and Spanish language translations.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 3744 (male), 5703 (female) (including 680 aged
between 65-69)
Military N N (male), N (female) 2399 (from NHIS and SOA II)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
2: N=24; 3: N=2042; 4: N=96; 5: N=44; 9: N=40,
N=22 (Served in Armed Forces,unknown if
war veteran), N=131 (Unknown if served in Armed
Forces)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
2
Ethnicity/ Race White= 8235; Black= 1009; Other= 203
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A (more in social activities)
coping E-5b: HAVE SERIOUS TROUBLE COPING
WITHDAY-TO-DAY STRESSES
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
Item J-1d/44-d: Veteran's benefits; F-4a-c: Military
health care
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress 1994 National Health Interview Survey on Disability,
Phase I: Mental Health
social well-being Item E-3b: HAVE A LOT OF TROUBLE GETTING
ALONG INSOCIAL SETTING; C-(1a-g): SOCIAL
ACTIVITIES DURING PAST 2 WEEKS; and other
family, volunteer, and community related variables
Template v2.11 Jan2014 54
LSOA II
Current Status Choices Study information
LSOA II
economic well-being Wave2 1997-1998 data: Section I- income and
assets
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (SOA: health status, limitation of activity, hospital
episodes in year) Item G.4; Section D: Assistance
With Key Activities; Section F: Health Opinions,
Behaviors and Nutrition; Section G: Cognitive
Functioning; Section J: Conditions and Impairments;
Section K: Health Opinions and Behaviors;
COMMENTS Bibliographies based on LSOAs and
SOAs
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/lsoa/lsoa_bibliography.htm
LSOA II wave 2 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/lsoa/w2sf.htm
LSOA II wave 3 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/lsoa/w3sf.htm
Decedent Interview for wave 2 and
wave 3 are included
Template v2.11 Jan2014 55
EPESE
EPESE
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies
of the Elderly
Website 1981-1993 http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/
9915?q=Established+Populations+for+the+Epidemi
ologic+Study+of+the+Elderly
1996-1997 http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/
2744?q=Established+Populations+for+the+Epidemi
ologic+Study+of+the+Elderly
NIA link Funding from USDHHS, NIH, NIA(N01-AG-0-2107,
N01-AG-0-2106, N01-AG-0-2105,N01-AG-2-2102)
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The goals of the EPESE project were to describe
and identify predictors of mortality, hospitalization,
and placement in long-term care facilities and to
investigate risk factors for chronic diseases and loss
of functioning for people 65 and older. Six follow-ups
were conducted, and information from death
certificates for deaths occurring in the first six years
of follow-up for all the four sites was also collected.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1981-1993 (Concurrently, the investigators
developed substudies focused on specific problems
of the elderly)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
2 ([East Boston, Massachusetts, Iowa and
Washington Counties, Iowa, New Haven,
Connecticut, and North Central North Carolina])
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1916 and before
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 2
Selection criteria for
sample
All noninstitutionalized persons 65+ in East Boston,
Massachusetts, New Haven, Connecticut, Iowa and
Washington Counties, Iowa, and five counties in
north central North Carolina.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Template v2.11 Jan2014 56
EPESE
EPESE
Current Status Choices Study information
Method In East Boston, individuals eligible for the study were
identified through a total community census
performed concurrently with the baseline interview in
1982. In Iowa, interviews were attempted with all
eligible persons enumerated using a list from the
area's Agency on Aging, supplemented by additional
listings from local informants. New Haven used a
stratified random sample of clusters of households.
The sample was stratified for three different types of
residence: public housing for the elderly, private
housing for the elderly, and elsewhere in the
community. Males were oversampled to attempt to
achieve balance in the sex distribution of the
sample. In North Carolina area sampling was used
at the first stage of the design to obtain a sample of
1980 census blocks, block clusters, and
enumeration districts. The sample was designed so
that it would consist of at least 50 percent Black
older persons.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) East Boston: 1449(male), 2360(female); Iowa:
1420(male), 2253(female); New Haven:
1169(male), 1642(female); Duke: 1458(male),
2704(female)
Military N N (male), N (female) N/A
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
N/A but two questions about whether receiving
retirement benefits from military; and whether
receiving "V.A. benefits (G.I. Bill, and disability
payments)" in the INCOME section
Ethnicity/ Race Only New Havan (non-black= 2283, black=529) &
Duke available (non-black= 1901, black=2261)
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events Two items about major events of the past year
(mainly regarding to death of close family members
or friends); 7 items on general life events (LE)
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014 57
EPESE
EPESE
Current Status Choices Study information
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
whether receiving "V.A. benefits (G.I. Bill, and
disability payments)" in the INCOME section
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating No, but using Functional Disability (ADL, IADL
related items)
psychological well-being / distress Items about depression
social well-being Items about social support and interaction
economic well-being Items about economic status
information from military or VA
records?
N/A (Military time record?)
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (various physical performance, physical
measurements data, blood pressure)
COMMENTS Military occupation and related services
were not specified in the questionnaires
and dataset.
Template v2.11 Jan2014 58
HEPESE
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Hispanic EPESE
Website
Wave 6, 2006-2007
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/st
udies/29654?q=Hispanic+EPESE
NIA link N/A
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
1) Estimate the prevalence of key physical and
mental health conditions and functional
impairments in older Mexican Americans and
compare this prevalence with that in other
populations for whom data exist; 2) Investigate
predictors of physical and mental health
conditions and functional status at baseline; 3)
Study changes in health and functioning among
survivors; 4) Examine changes in health
behaviors and key social mediators of health
status, including social networks and supports
and various key transitions such as widowhood
and changes in living arrangements, including
institutionalization.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
The Hispanic EPESE began in 1993-94, with 5
follow-ups: (1995-96, 1998-99, 2000-01, 2004-
05, and 2006-2007).
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
2 (nationally representative sample) Unlike the
other EPESE studies that were restricted to
small geographic areas, the Hispanic EPESE
aimed at obtaining a representative sample of
community-dwelling Mexican American elderly
residing in the five Southwestern states of
Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, and
California. Approximately 85% of Mexican
American elderly reside in these states and the
investigators were able to obtain data that are
generalizable to roughly 500,000 older people
(U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1990). The final
sample size of 3,050 subjects at baseline is
comparable to those of the other EPESE
studies and is sufficiently large to provide
stable estimates of most health characteristics
of interest.
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1928 and earlier
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (total 6 waves)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 3 (Multistage, stratified, probability sample)
Selection criteria for
sample
Non-institutionalized Mexican Americans aged
65 and over residing in the five Southwestern
states (Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona,
and California)
HEPESE
Template v2.11 Jan2014 59
HEPESE
Current Status Choices Study information
HEPESE
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Study is patterned after original EPESE
studies, in particular the Piedmont (Duke)
EPESE. Data sources included personal
interviews, questionnaires, and physical
assessments.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) N= 3,050 with an additional 902 added at 4th
follow-up; 1291 (male), 1759 (female)
Military N N (male), N (female) E3b.p; one question EE3.P (var. EE3), N=26
regularly attending veteran's group
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
1 (type of employment)
Ethnicity/ Race Var. RACE: Mexican, Mexican-American,
Chicano= 2834; Hispano= 216
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma only one var. about "Victim of crime" (CC1h)
life events Section CC.
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A; but using ADLs, IADLs, performance-
based measures, and sensory impairment
psychological well-being / distress Var. U1a (other health problems)
social well-being INSTRUMENTAL SOCIAL SUPPORT and
FAMILY CONTACTS
economic well-being Railroad or military pension LL1E (N= 126);
CHRONIC ECONOMIC STRAINS (section LL.)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014 60
HEPESE
Current Status Choices Study information
HEPESE
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (Chronic conditions, related health problems,
health habits, self-reported health services
utilization)
COMMENTS PI: Markides, Kyriakos S. http://pmch.utmb.edu/about/faculty/kokosmarki
des.aspx
Template v2.11 Jan2014 61
NLMS
Parameters Choices Study information
Study name National longitudinal mortality study (NLMS)
Website http://www.census.gov/did/www/nlms/
NIA link This is funded by Cencus Bureau
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
To provide an analytical research database for the
purpose of studying the effect of demographic and
socio-economic differentials on U.S. mortality rates
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
Data files linking Census data to death certificate
information are available for 1973-2002 (one-time
measurement for participants not longitudinal)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0 (every March interviewing about 30'000 random
American households, 3 million participants,
combining their information from 30 different
national databases)
Birth cohort(s) Age varies depending on when participants were
surveyed (for Year of birth: var. YOB) (Some have
been followed up longer than others)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
2= The NLMS currently consists of Annual Social
and Economic Supplements which cover the period
from March 1973 to March 2002, Current Population
Surveys for February 1978, April 1980, August
1980, December 1980, and September 1985, and
one 1980 Census cohort, 30+ cohorts but one-time
measurement for all. Each has either telephone
interview or home visit.
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
This is a secondary data linkage and does not
require participation by individual respondents. It is a
random sample of the non-institutionalized
population of the United States. It consists of U.S.
Census Bureau data from Current Population
Surveys, Annual Social and Economic Supplements
and a subset of the 1980 Census combined with
death certificate information to identify mortality
status and cause of death.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed, but the current plan for the NLMS is to
integrate information on mortality into the NLMS
every two years from 1998 through 2006 with
research on updating the database. The NLMS will
continue to incorporate data from the yearly Annual
Social and Economic Supplement into the study as
the data become available.
Method Census data are linked to mortality information
obtained from death certificates available for
deceased persons through the NCHS, with current
870'000 Medicare records.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 475,062 (male), 513,284 (female)
Military N N (male), N (female) Veteran status: N= 117,556; Active Duty: N= 169;
Varies across cohorts from Veteran status
(VTSTAT)
NLMS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 62
NLMS
Parameters Choices Study information
NLMS
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
Veteran status (VTSTAT): including 2, 3, 4, 5, 9
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1
Ethnicity/ Race White (855,951), black (100,476), American Indian
or Eskimo (9,040), Asian or Pacific Islander
(18,899), Other nonwhile (916), unknown or missing
(3,064); there is a item on "Hispanic Origin (HISP)"
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A (no specific illness information but household
information)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
Health Insurance Type (Var: HITYPE; 3=
ChampUS, ChampVA, VA Health Care, Military
Health Care, Indian Health Care, Other
Governmental Health Care) N ranged from 618 to
1379 across cohort files
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating No, but one variable- Employment Status Recode
ESR (Simple and Recoding Edits): 4= Not in the
labor force, disabled, unable to work
psychological well-being / distress N/A
social well-being N/A
economic well-being No, but one variable on Family Income in Current
Dollars (FMINCOME)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1, General Health (Var: HEALTH)
COMMENTS Reference Manuel http://www.census.gov/did/www/nlms/publications/re
ference.html
NACDA announcement http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACDA/suppo
rt/announcements/2010/10/national-longitudinal-
mortality-study
Template v2.11 Jan2014 63
Project TALENT
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Project Talent
Website http://www.projecttalent.org/about/overview
ICPSR link http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACDA/suppo
rt/announcements/2010/12/project-talent-data
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
Project Talent is a national longitudinal study that
first surveyed America’s high school students in
1960, the largest and most comprehensive. It was
instrumental in revealing the factors, both within and
beyond the school system, that influence students'
educational attainment. It also transformed the field
of aptitude testing and led to increased
understanding of the connections between certain
identifiable skills and career success later in life. In
addition, it has contributed to research ranging from
the changing role of women in American society to
the experiences of veterans of the Vietnam War.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1960, 1971-1974 (three follow-ups, at 1, 5, and 11
years after high school graduation) (Card (1987)
studied the effect of Vietnam war and surveyed the
class of 1963 again in 1981)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0
Birth cohort(s) Between 1945- 1947
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 3
Selection criteria for
sample
From information provided by the United States
Office of Education (USOE), 1,063 public, private,
and parochial senior high schools were asked to
participate. Of these schools, 987 (93%) agreed to
take part (with the exception of New York City and
Chicago schools). Selected schools were intended
to reflect the diversity of the American high school
experience. All 9th-graders in the junior high schools
associated with participating senior high schools
were also included. 238 junior high schools were
part of Project Talent, bringing the total number of
randomly selected schools to 1,225. In addition,
128 schools asked to participate in the study as
"volunteer" schools, bringing the total number of
schools in Project Talent to 1,353.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed but the follow-up studies are ongoing
(American Institutes for Research (AIR) is
developing a follow-up to the study that will focus on
retirement planning, health, well being, financial
status, career satisfaction and family life).
Project TALENT
Template v2.11 Jan2014 64
Project TALENT
Current Status Choices Study information
Project TALENT
Method Grades 9 through 12 were administered an
extensive battery of tests and questions that
examined students' competencies in subjects such
as mathematics, science, and reading
comprehension, as well as three separate
questionnaires about family background, personal
and educational experiences, aspirations for future
education and vocation, and interests in various
occupations and activities.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 440,000 students (approximately 5% of the high
school students in America) (N=50,000 9th graders)
Military N N (male), N (female) N= 1385 (male, class of 1963)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
5 (However, the existing TALENT file had
information on whether the men ever had been in
the military, but not on where such service was
spent.)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1,2,3
Ethnicity/ Race N/A
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
1 (defining PTSD in the 1981 survey questionnaire
based on DSM IV, see Card, 1987, p102- 117 for
details; also see copies in study-specific files) The
severity of veterans' PTSD was not related to any
pre-service characteristics but was determined by
the intensity of trauma experienced during active
combat.
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
0
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
0
Other measures trauma Lives after Vietnam (Card, 1983) was one of the
earliest studies to document the psychological and
physical consequences of active combat for
Vietnam veterans.
life events Family-formation activities, work-related, education
attainment and life satisfaction in various domains
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
Positive and negative effects of military service and
of Vietnam were listed in Table 6-7 and 6-8 in Card
(1987). The three most-cited positive effects were:
1) Increased appreciation for the value of life, for
what is important in life; 2) development of
appreciation for the American way of life; 3) feeling
of patriotism, of pride in having served one's
country. The negative effects were most associated
with PTSD symptoms (Card, 1987, p.138-139)
Template v2.11 Jan2014 65
Project TALENT
Current Status Choices Study information
Project TALENT
homecoming Section IV. item A on the date of service for which
military unit(s) and item M on the Vietnam Service
Dates
unit cohesion/social support Section IV. items S,T,U,V on unit cohesion and trust
on officers and/or drafts
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
1/3 of all veterans owned their homes with the help
of the GI bill. Use of the GI bill and its free-schooling
provisions subsequent to leaving the military was
associated with higher educational attainment-
around 1 and 1.5 years more in 1981.
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
Vietnam veterans showed higher levels of maturity
and sensitivity to others than their classmates who
did not serve, although they tended to marry and
become fathers significantly later in life than non-
veterans. There were some variables related to
personal growth and psychological health (see Table
6-7 in Card, 1987)
VA disability rating N/A (one item from Section I, CC. "are you receiving
or have you received military disability or pension
payments?)
psychological well-being / distress Rating of overall life satisfaction and 11 dimensions
of life satisfaction; and Psychological Health,
including alienation, anxiety, hostility, and
depression; and Section III on quality of life.
social well-being indexes of Social Health, including 7 social-
interaction problems and 3 antisocial behavior items
(section III)
economic well-being Section I, item BB. on houlsehold gross income and
U-W about job; one item in Section III on satisfaction
of financial security and material well-being
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (section II on health and section III on quality of
life)
COMMENTS Project Talent Public Use File, 1960-
1976
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/
7823
Project Talent, Base Year Data (1960) http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/
33341?q=Project+Talent
CARD, J. J. (1983). Lives after
Vietnam: The personal impact of
military service. Lexington, MA: Heath.
In 1981 the influential Lives after Vietnam: the
Personal Impact of Military Service (CARD, 1983)
was published, based on the experiences of 1,500
class of 1963 Project Talent participants.
In 2010, thanks to the advanced technology, social
science, health, aging, and economics researchers
begin designing the Project Talent 50-year follow-
up survey and a planning meeting is hosted by the
National Bureau of Economic Research. AIR
launches outreach efforts to reconnect with original
participants!
Template v2.11 Jan2014 66
NSFH
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name National Survey of Families and Households
(NSFH)
Website Wave I & II:
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studie
s/6906/detail; Wave III:
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studie
s/171/detail
Official cite link http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/home2.htm
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The NSFH was designed to provide a broad range
of information on family life to serve as a resource
for research across disciplines. A considerable
amount of life-history information was collected,
including: the respondent's family living
arrangements in childhood, departures and
returns to the parental home, and histories of
marriage, cohabitation, education, fertility, and
employment.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
Interviews were conducted in 1987-88, 1992-94,
and 2001-2003.
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
3
Birth cohort(s) 1967 and earlier
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1 (nationally representative) plus oversamplings for
some groups.
Selection criteria for
sample
Noninstitutionalized population aged 19 and older or
married. States.National, stratified, multistage area
probability sample based on 1985 population
projections for Standard Metropolitan Statistical
Areas andSample:nonmetropolitan counties.
Minorities (Blacks, Puerto Ricans, and Chicanos),
single parents, persons with stepchildren, cohabiting
persons,and persons who were recently married
were double-sampled.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Personal interviews and self-enumerated
questionnaires, including parent and child interviews.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 5227 (male); 7790 (female)
Military N N (male), N (female) N= 1844 (from Variable M523: ACTIVE DUTY IN
ARMED SERVICES in the Variable Group Military
Service)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
Before 1940: 34; 1940-1949: 552; 1950-1959: 356;
1960-1969: 445; 1970-1988: 452 from Variable
M524M: DATE CODE CENT MO/ACTIVE DUTY
BEGIN)
National Study of Families and Households
Template v2.11 Jan2014 67
NSFH
Current Status Choices Study information
National Study of Families and Households
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
Variable M526: INVOLVED IN COMBAT (N= 619)
Ethnicity/ Race Black: 2389; non-Hispanic white: 9413; Mexican
American, Chicano, Mexicano: 629; and others and
no answers
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
No data on PTSD
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping items about stress raising children and family
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A but whether one (and the household) recieved
ther government programs, such as veterans
benefits etc.
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress items about family relationships; Well-being, Health,
Social Participation and Support
social well-being Attending social groups, and values about social
activities for children
economic well-being Income
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1
COMMENTS NSFH working papers http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/cde/nsfhwp/home.php
Only one publication related to military
using NSFH
Ruger, William; Wilson, Sven E. and Waddoups,
Shawn L. 2002. "Warfare and Welfare: Military
Service, Combat, and Marital Dissolution." Armed
Forces & Society 29(1): 85-107.
Web-accessible data http://nesstar.ssc.wisc.edu/webview/index.jsp
Template v2.11 Jan2014 68
NSHAP
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name National social life, health and aging project
(NSHAP)
Website http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/natio
nal-social-life-health-and-aging-project.aspx
NIA link NSHAP is supported by the National Institutes of
Health (R01-AG021487), (R37-AG030481), and
(R01-AG033903) and NORC
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The two waves of NSHAP are essential to
understanding how social and biological
characteristics change. By eliciting a variety of
information from respondents over time, provides
data that will allow researchers in a number of fields
to examine how specific factors may or may not
affect each other across the life course. The study
contributes to finding new ways to improve health as
people age.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
2005-2006, 2010-2011
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
3
Birth cohort(s) between 1920 and 1947
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
NSHAP uses a national area probability sample of
community residing adults (aged 57 to 85 at the time
of the Wave 1 interview), which includes an
oversampling of African-Americans and Hispanics.
The sample is built on the foundation of the Health
and Retirement Study (HRS) in 2004.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed (only conducting interviews with the wave 1
sample)
Method Data collection included three measurements: in-
home interviews, biomeasures, and leave-behind
respondent-administered
questionnaires.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 3,005 completed interviews [533 (male); 897
(female); 1575 (not applicable)]
Military N N (male), N (female) N=677
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A (currently it only has a single question about
whether serving military)
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1
National Social Liife, Health and Aging Project
Template v2.11 Jan2014 69
NSHAP
Current Status Choices Study information
National Social Liife, Health and Aging Project
Ethnicity/ Race White/caucasian: 2295; black/african american:
509; American indian or Alaskan native:22; Asian or
Pacific Islander: 36; other: 135
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A, but N=175 covered by veteran insurance.
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress Questions on mental health, including HAPPINESS
& LIFE SATISFACTION and DEPRESSION,
ANXIETY, & STRESS
social well-being Questions related to Social Networks/Social
Support, Romantic Partnerships and Sexual Activity
etc
economic well-being Questions on Employment and Finances, including
work-related activities in the last week and Income.
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 & 2 (Physical Health, including self-reported
health, sensory function, surgeries and procedures,
morbidity, fertility and menopause, functional health,
health-related behaviors, and cognitive function)
COMMENTS Data on NACDA http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACDA/studie
s/20541/detail
Wave 2 data will be updated in summer
2012
The National Social Life, Health, and
Aging Project: An Introduction (2009)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC27635
20/
Template v2.11 Jan2014 70
NHANES
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey (NHANES)
Website http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.
htm
CDC link Main Continuous and Historical
NHANES Tutorials
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The survey is unique in that it combines
interviews and physical examinations.
NHANES is a major program of the National
Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Findings
from this survey will be used to determine the
prevalence of major diseases and risk factors
for diseases. Information will be used to assess
nutritional status and its association with health
promotion and disease prevention. NHANES
findings are also the basis for national
standards for such measurements as height,
weight, and blood pressure. Data from this
survey will be used in epidemiological studies
and health sciences research, which help
develop sound public health policy, direct and
design health programs and services, and
expand the health knowledge for the Nation.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
It began in the early 1960s and has been
ongoing since 1999.
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0
Birth cohort(s) Not focusing on specific cohorts (age range
from 0 to 85+)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
0 [before 1999, including NHANES I (1971-
1975; NHANES II (1976-1980); NHANES III
(1988-1994)]; 2 [the current NHANES, aka
Continuous NHANES, refers to the two-year
cycles of data produced since 1999. see
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/NHANES/Sur
veyOrientation/DataStructureContents/Info1.ht
m]
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 3 (a complex, multistage, probability sampling
design)
Selection criteria for
sample
Nationally representative samples
Open or closed to
enrollment
Open
NHANES
Template v2.11 Jan2014 71
NHANES
Current Status Choices Study information
NHANES
Method The NHANES interview includes demographic,
socioeconomic, dietary, and health-related
questions. The examination component
consists of medical, dental, and physiological
measurements, as well as laboratory tests
administered by highly trained medical
personnel.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 4883 (male); 5082 (female) in 1999-2000
Military N N (male), N (female) about 700 (Ever served in every two years
survey), sample could be combined/weighted
for examining the trend
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
1
Ethnicity/ Race 1999-2000 (linked to NHANES III): 3423(Non-
Hispanic White); 2273 (Non-Hispanic Black);
3393 (Mexican American); and others
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
4 (one self-reported item)
Other measures trauma N/A
life events N/A
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress General Well-Being (GWB) and CED-S
social well-being Social support questionnaires
economic well-being Income (personal and household)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1,2
Template v2.11 Jan2014 72
NHANES
Current Status Choices Study information
NHANES
COMMENTS NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup
Study (NHEFS)
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhefs/nhefs.ht
m
Publised study about veterans:
Obesity, Overweight, and their Life
Course Trajectories in Veterans and
Non-Veterans: Findings from
NHANES
http://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/meetings/2011
/abstract-display.cfm?RecordID=436
Template v2.11 Jan2014 73
NSBlackAm
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name National Survey of Black Americans
Website http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACDA/st
udies/06668/version/1
NIA link N/A
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The purpose of this data collection was to
provide an appropriate theoretical and
empirical approach to concepts, measures, and
methods in the study of Black Americans. It
investigates neighborhood-community
integration, services, crime and community
contact, the role of religion and the church,
physical and mental health, self-esteem, life
satisfaction, employment, the effects of chronic
unemployment, the effects of race on the job,
interaction with family and friends, racial
attitudes, race identity, group stereotypes, and
race ideology.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
Waves 1-4, 1979-1980, 1987-1988, 1988-1989,
1992
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1961 and earlier
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1 (National multistage probability sample)
Selection criteria for
sample
Sample were black United States citizens 18
years of age or older. The sample is self-
weighting. Every Black American household in
the continental United States had an equal
probability of being selected.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Personal interviews and questionnaires. Wave
1 was administered to 2,107 respondents,
Wave 2 to 951 respondents (including 935 from
Wave 1), Wave 3 to 793 respondents
(including 779 from Wave 2), and Wave 4 to
659 respondents (including 1 from Wave 1, 28
from Wave 2, and 623 from Wave 3).
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 797 (male), 1310 (female)
Military N N (male), N (female) 303 (male), 13 (female)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
ranging from 1914- 1979; 3= 101; 4= 40; 5=
113; 9= 62
National Survey of Black Americans
Template v2.11 Jan2014 74
NSBlackAm
Current Status Choices Study information
National Survey of Black Americans
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
1 (Q.H15. Have You Ever Been in the Military
Service?) 2 N=109 (Q.H15c. Were You Ever in
Combat?) 3 (Q.H15a. What Year Did You Go
in? Q.H15b. What Year Did You Come out?)
Ethnicity/ Race 100% Black
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events General statements about negative events at
work, related to school; Civil Right experiences
etc.
coping a bit from V170- 174 (Q.C28. Which One of
These Problems Upset You the Most?;
Q.C30(a). What Did You Do to Deal with?)
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
such as not working full time (Q.D31. etc.);
V1449 used skills learned in military, N=100
homecoming V1447: year out of military service
unit cohesion/social support N/A (social support items focus on family and
friends)
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
V1449
VA disability rating N/A; disability items were related to
(un)employment
psychological well-being / distress DSM III used for Depression (V3500-3503/4500-
4503/5500-5503); general psychological health
V61-V81
social well-being Items focus on family and friends
economic well-being Financial, material situation (exc. housing);
housing/residence; work; school etc.
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (V82: General health; V83-V109 other
physical health related items)
COMMENTS Sample Characteristics http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/cgi-
bin/bob/sampchars?path=NACDA&study=6668
&resc_id=461
Template v2.11 Jan2014 75
NHIS
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)
Website http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/about_nhis.htm
CDC link Data release:
http://www.cdc.gov/NCHS/nhis/quest_data_rela
ted_1997_forward.htm;
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/nhis_questionnair
es.htm
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The NHIS, referred to in the National Health
Survey Act of 1956, was initiated in July 1957.
The main objective of the NHIS is to monitor
the health of the US population through the
collection and analysis of data on a broad
range of health topics. A major strength of this
survey lies in the ability to display these health
characteristics by many demographic and
socioeconomic characteristics. The NHIS
covers the civilian noninstitutionalized
population residing in the United States at the
time of the interview. Because of technical and
logistical problems, several segments of the
population are not included in the sample or in
the estimates from the survey. Examples of
persons excluded are patients in long-term care
facilities; persons on active duty with the
Armed Forces (though their dependents are
included); persons incarcerated in the prison
system; and U.S. nationals living in foreign
countries.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1957, ongoing (data available since 1963)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0
Birth cohort(s)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
0= cross-sectional household interview survey
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
National Health Interview Survey
Template v2.11 Jan2014 76
NHIS
Current Status Choices Study information
National Health Interview Survey
Selection criteria for
sample
The sampling plan follows a multistage area
probability design that permits the
representative sampling of households and
noninstitutional group quarters (e.g., college
dormitories). The sampling plan is redesigned
after every decennial census. The current
sampling plan was implemented in 2006
(though similiar to those from 1995 to 2005).
The first stage of the current sampling plan
consists of a sample of 428 primary sampling
units (PSU's). The current NHIS sample design
oversample Black, Hispanic and Asian persons
(aged 65+). For more details:
www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_130.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Open
Method Sampling and household interviewing are
continuous throughout each year. The 1982-
1996 questionnaires consisted of two parts: (1)
a set of basic health and demographic items
(known as the Core questionnaire), and (2) one
or more sets of questions on current health
topics.The revised NHIS questionnaire fielded
since 1997 uses a computer assisted personal
interviewing (CAPI) mode, including Core
questions and Supplements. The Core
questions remain largely unchanged from year
to year and allow for trends analysis and for
data from more than one year to be pooled to
increase sample size for analytic purposes. The
Core contains four major components:
Household, Family, Sample Adult, and Sample
Child. The Supplements are used to respond to
new public health data needs as they arise.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) Interviewed [household (persons)] per year:
between 1973-84 [40,000 (108,000)]; 1985-94
[49,000 (132,000)]; 1995-2004 [55,000
(159,000)]
Military N N (male), N (female) Ever served: N= 6823; current: N=255
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
7= 918; 1990-2001= 1151; 1980-90= 1191;
1975-1980= 802; 5 (1964-75)= 2237; 1961-64=
585; 1955-61= 705; 4= 713; 1947-50= 146;
before 1946= 500; 6 (1990-1991)= 387 [from
questions FSD.023, FSD. 024, 2011]
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
3
Template v2.11 Jan2014 77
NHIS
Current Status Choices Study information
National Health Interview Survey
Ethnicity/ Race White= 24818; Black= 5086; AIAN= 336;
Asian= 2136; Other= 638
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
N/A (ICD used)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events Some items from Personal file 2011, e.g. lost
Medicaid, move, new job, increase in income
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
Military health care coverage (N= 3238 in
2011)
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating Only questions about functioning limitations,
e.g. AHS.336; or ADL help, e.g. AAU.584; or
unable to work due to health problems, e.g.
FHS.180
psychological well-being / distress Items about depression/anxiety/emotional
problems (e.g. AHS.200_17; AHS.316)
social well-being N/A
economic well-being Items about employment (e.g. ASD.062;
ASD.110)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 (in the Sample Adult data) (about family
members in Family file)
COMMENTS The Health of Male Veterans and
Nonveterans Aged 25–64: United
States, 2007–2010
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db101.
htm
One can merge Sample Adult data for
health outcomes with the Person file;
however, the veterans in the sample
adult file represent a subset of all
adult veterans on the Person file, one
will have fewer veterans to analyze.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/nhis_2011_data_r
elease.htm
Template v2.11 Jan2014 78
LSOG
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Longitudinal Study of Generations
Website https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/st
udies/22100?archive=ICPSR&q=lsog
NIA link
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The LSOG began as a survey of
intergenerational relations among 300 three-
generation California families and now includes
a fourth generation. With such a generation-
sequential design, it allows comparisons of sets
of aging parents and children at the same stage
of life but during different historical periods. It
makes possible the investigation of the effects
of social change on inter-generational solidarity
or conflict across 35 years and four
generations, and effects of social change on
the ability of families to buffer stressful life
transitions, and the effects of social change on
the transmission of values, resources, and
behaviors across generations. It also examines
how intergenerational relationships influence
individuals' well-being as they transition across
the life course from early, to middle, to late
adulthood.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1971, 1985, 1988, 1991, 1994, 1997, 2000
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
2 (California)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1911 and earlier for the grandparent generation
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (generation-sequential design)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
Families were drawn randomly from a
subscriber list of 840,000 members of a
California Health Maintenance Organization in
Los Angeles. Families were recruited by
enlisting a grandfather over 60 who was part of
a three-generation family that was willing to
participate.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Computer-assisted self interview (CASI), face-
to-face interview, mail questionnaire, self-
enumerated questionnaire, telephone interview
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) Total of 3496 (Male= 973, Female= 1071)
Longitudinal Study of Generations
Template v2.11 Jan2014 79
LSOG
Current Status Choices Study information
Longitudinal Study of Generations
Military N N (male), N (female) 317 (among them 172 were male, 5 were
female, but others were unknown) (some items
on spouse's and children's military experience)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
mostly 3=157 ; 1947-50= 26; 4= 26; 5= 55
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
1, 2, 3 (Section 1, PART 9: MILITARY
SERVICE)
Ethnicity/ Race Mainly white (N~= 1481)
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma only head trauma
life events Section XII: LIFE EVENTS AND CONCERNS
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress Section IX: MENTAL HEALTH AND WELL-
BEING
social well-being Section IX: MENTAL HEALTH AND WELL-
BEING
economic well-being Section XI: Income etc.
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1
COMMENTS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 80
Grant
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Grant Study of Adult Development
Website http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/mra/faces/study/Stu
dyPage.xhtml?globalId=hdl:1902.1/00290
NIA link
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The purpose was to examine how a sample of men
adapt to life. The original researcher sperceived
medical research to be too heavily weighted in the
direction of disease, and designed the study to chart
how men coped with their lives over a period of
time. As the study progressed, some data were
collected from the wives of study participants. It is
one of the longest-running and comprehensive
longitudinal studies of mental and physical well-
being in history. The Grant "College cohort" is part of
the Study of Adult Development with another "the
Inner City cohort" (the “Glueck Study”, 1968).
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1939/1942 to 1999/2000 (72 years) (38% were
dead at the 2000 contact), ongoing (contact
http://www.massgeneral.org/psychiatry/research/adu
lt_dev_home.aspx)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
2
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1920 +- 2 (mean: 1921)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (Data collection started during the participants'
sophomore year in college and continued through
senior year. After college graduation, participants
received annual questionnaires until 1955. Since
1956, participants have received questionnaires
every 2 years.)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 3 (quota sampling)
Selection criteria for
sample
The study recruited 268 healthy men attending
Harvard University in their sophomore year through
senior year between 1938 and 1942.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Data included psychiatric interviews (only when the
subjects were in college), follow-up questionnaires,
institutional records, psychological tests, and
medical examinations. Questionnaires were
conducted every 2 years, physical exams were
every 5 years, and in-depth interviews were every 5-
10 years.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 268 (male); 214 (their wives in later surveys)
Military N N (male), N (female) 254 (11 were rejected for military service due to
physical deficit, and 3 due to psychiatric reasons)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
3
Grant Study of Adult Development
Template v2.11 Jan2014 81
Grant
Current Status Choices Study information
Grant Study of Adult Development
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1= e.g. VETSTAT (Veteran status, WWII), 2=
various items about combat-related experiences;
SOLDR88 (sum of combat experiences)
Ethnicity/ Race 100% Caucasian
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
PTSD88: Number of the following symptoms on the
1988 Questionnaire PTSD Scale (1988);
CURPTSD; PASTPTSD
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma Variables include ACT, SYMBOL, AVOIDTH,
AVOIDAC, & RECALL, about one to two years
after combat experience in 1946-7.
life events The life events checklist (from Cui X, Vaillant GE:
Antecedents and consequences of negative life
events in adulthood: a longitudinal study. American
Journal of Psychiatry 1996; 152:21-26)
coping Items from the Mini-Q-sort of defenses; Maturity of
defense mechanisms
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
JOBPROB (Job problems, WWII since separation
from military)
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support Items on unit size, unit combat
prisoner of war status (same as above)
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
Most of them used GI benefits for higher education;
DISABILITY (Disability benefits,
WWII)
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
such as wisdom characteristics, subjective well-
being; see Ardelt, Landes & Vaillant (2010) for an
example
VA disability rating N/A, but items on physical health and ADLs
psychological well-being / distress SF-36 scale, items on subjective well-being,
depressive symptoms etc.
social well-being SF-36; more from the actual paper data
economic well-being N/A, except income etc.
information from military or VA
records?
No
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1; 2 (every 5 years for physical exams, compared to
every 2 years for questionnaires)
COMMENTS http://www.massgeneral.org/psychiatry/research/adu
lt_dev_study.aspx
http://www.exrx.net/Psychology/GrantGlueckStudy.h
tml
The other cohort for comparison 90 women were selectied from the Stanford
(Terman) study of gifted children, beginning in 1022
The Study of Adult Development, i.e.
the Grant and Glueck Longitudinal
Studies
Template v2.11 Jan2014 82
Grant
Current Status Choices Study information
Grant Study of Adult Development
Fewer descriptive data files but the
actual paper data, see Ardelt, Landes &
Vaillant, 2010 for more details
In general, the Study men performed well on the
battlefield. Instead of an expected 36, only 3 were
rejected for psychiatric reasons. If just 10 percent of
the Student men went into the army with
commissions, 71 percent were officers at discharge.
During combat they reported fewer symptoms of
nausea, incontinence, and palpitation than have
been reported by other studies of men under battle
conditions; but on the battlefield the Study men won
more than their share of medals for heroism. To
assess the men’s level of combat exposure, the
numberof combat experiences could be combined
with a sustained danger scale
See "College men at war", JP Monks, 1957
Template v2.11 Jan2014 83
Glueck
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name The Glueck Study
Website http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/mra/faces/study/Stu
dyPage.xhtml?globalId=hdl:1902.1/10459&studyListi
ngIndex=4_ebccfe06a6d69891db40e0d5da02
Study official link http://www.massgeneral.org/psychiatry/research/adu
lt_dev_home.aspx
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
As part of the Crime Causation Study, this study
sought to gather vital statistics on the participant,
members of hisimmediate family, faternal and
maternal grandparents, aunts, and uncles.
Additionally, the study examineddifferences between
delinquents and nondelinquents (Glueck study
sample) in terms of familial difficulties through
thereconstruction of family histories of delinquency,
substance abuse, psychiatric conditions, intellectual
andphysical impairments.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1940-1948 (Time I), five follow-ups, 1978-1988
(TimeV), ongoing (contact
http://www.massgeneral.org/psychiatry/research/adu
lt_dev_home.aspx)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
2
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1929 +- 2
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 3 (purposeful sampling)
Selection criteria for
sample
The Inner City cohort was selected by Sheldon and
Eleanor Glueck (Glueck and Glueck 1968) as
matched controls for their prospective study,
Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency. These controls
were selected when they were age 11-16 by
reviewing the enrollments of neighborhood schools.
They were chosen because they did not manifest
serious delinquency; and they were individually
matched with the delinquent group for ethnicity
(predominantly Irish- and Italian-American), for
limited intelligence (mean IQ = 94), and for living in a
high-crime neighborhood.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Compatible with the Grant Study: Data included
psychiatric interviews (only when the subjects were
in college), follow-up questionnaires, institutional
records, psychological tests, and medical
examinations. Questionnaires were conducted every
2 years, physical exams were every 5 years, and in-
depth interviews were every 5-10 years.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 500 (Time 1), 456 (Time 2) men (later including their
spouses)
The Glueck Study
Template v2.11 Jan2014 84
Glueck
Current Status Choices Study information
The Glueck Study
Military N N (male), N (female) Few
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
They were between WWII and Vietnam, with
relatively few serving in Korea.
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
Indirectly variable on job/employment as military
service etc.
Ethnicity/ Race 456 Caucasian (with one of Asian origin)
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
NO, there were no events common for the Glueck
sample that migh trigger PTSD in the way that WWII
may have done so for the Grant sample.
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma Traumatic experience (not a consequence of
alcoholism) (Var.= TRAUMA)
life events Some info from Retirement Variables
coping Michael Bond’s Defense Style Questionnaire
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress Mental health, Items BONDQU1 to BONQU67 are
the 67 questions on Michael Bond’s Defense Style
Questionnaire
social well-being For overall well-being after retirement, participants
were asked to rate on a 5- point scale their degree
of satisfaction in different life areas over the past 20
years (in the Retirement Variable section)
economic well-being (same as above, with addition income-related
variables)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1,2
COMMENTS The Glueck Non-Delinquent Follow-Up,
1974 -2001
http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/mra/faces/study/Stu
dyPage.xhtml?globalId=hdl:1902.1/10459&studyListi
ngIndex=4_ebccfe06a6d69891db40e0d5da02
Template v2.11 Jan2014 85
Glueck
Current Status Choices Study information
The Glueck Study
Crime Causation Study: Unraveling
Juvenile Delinquency, 1940-1963
http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/mra/faces/study/Stu
dyPage.xhtml?globalId=hdl:1902.1/00896&studyListi
ngIndex=4_ebccfe06a6d69891db40e0d5da02
Template v2.11 Jan2014 86
PHSE- NC EPESE
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Piedmont Health Survey of the Elderly, Fourth
In-Person Survey
Website https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/st
udies/2744?archive=ICPSR&q=Piedmont+Heal
th+Survey+of+the+Elderly
NIA link
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The PHSE is a multiyear study sponsored by
the NIA as one of the components of the
EPESE. The EPESE project was to describe
and identify predictors of mortality,
hospitalization, and placement in long-term
care facilities and to investigate risk factors for
chronic diseases and loss of functioning. The
data included in this release of the EPESE
(since 1981) make up the seventh follow-up
and the fourth in-person interview for the North
Carolina site. This NC cohort was the only
EPESE site in the southeastern US. This site
was unique in that the baseline cohort was over
50-percent Black, and the geographic area
selected was diverse, allowing both racial and
urban/rural comparisons to be made regarding
the distribution of certain risk factors and
disease.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1986/87, 1996/1997 (seven follow-ups; 4th in-
person interview)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
2 [Durham, Warren, Vance, Granville, and
Franklin Counties, North Carolina]
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) 1921-1922 and later
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 3= four-stage, stratified, probability sample with
an oversample of Blacks
Selection criteria for
sample
All noninstitutionalized persons 65 years of age
and older (at baseline, 1986-1987) in Durham,
Warren, Vance, Granville, and Franklin
counties in north central North Carolina.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Survey data and clinical data (personal
interviews and multiscale questionnaires)
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) A total of 4,162 at baseline for age 65-69 (N =
1,420), 70-74 (N = 1,121), 75-79 (N = 794), 80-
84 (N = 505), and 85+ (N = 322). The 7th follow-
up total is 1,766 for 513 (Male), 1253 (Female).
Military N N (male), N (female) N/A
PHSE- NC EPESE
Template v2.11 Jan2014 87
PHSE- NC EPESE
Current Status Choices Study information
PHSE- NC EPESE
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
N/A, there are some questions related to use of
veterans’ health services and disability pay;
otherwise nothing specific. One can identify
veterans, whether they use veterans’ health
services, and whether they have any disability
income related to their service.
Ethnicity/ Race 816 (White), 944 (Black), 6 (Missing)
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events 30 items on life events possibly happended in
the past year and whether the effects were
positive, negative or neutural for the
participants (V302-331)
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A, but V388 asked whether receiving any
retirement benefits from a source other
thanSocial Security (such as pension payments
or railroad or military) (yes, N=56)
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress 15 items on life satisfaction (V282- V296); 10
items on locus of control (V332-341)
social well-being 28 items about family and friends and how they
help the participants (V342-369); 10 items on
feelings about self (V373-382); 3 items on
religious activities (V370-372)
economic well-being 11 items on economic situations (V383-393)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1= Self-reported on medical conditions, health
care utilization, physical problems, ADLs,
IADLs, smoking, drinking, sleeping etc. 5=
Pulse, blood pressure, cuff etc. assessed by
interviewers (V394-404)
COMMENTS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 88
BRFSS
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Website http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
NIA link
other website(s) Annual Survey Data http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_d
ata.htm
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
BRFSS is the nation's premier system of health-
related telephone surveys that collect state
data about U.S. residents regarding their health-
related risk behaviors, chronic health
conditions, and use of preventive services.
BRFSS collects data in all 50 states as well as
the District of Columbia and three U.S.
territories. BRFSS completes more than
400,000 adult interviews each year, making it
the largest continuously conducted health
survey system in the world.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
2010 (when a module on veterans was included
a first time), ongoing
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1 (data are stratified and collected by states)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0
Birth cohort(s) N/A (1984 was the first year of data collection)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
0
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
Adults 18 years or older
Open or closed to
enrollment
Open
Method The survey is conducted using Random Digit
Dialing (RDD) techniques on both landlines and
cell phones.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female)
Military N N (male), N (female) 2010 survey (variable name: VETERAN2):
"Yes, now on active duty" (N=1415), "Yes, on
active duty during the last 12 months, but not
now" (N=1390), "Yes, on active duty in the
past, but not during the last 12 months"
(N=57627)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
Either 8=Peacetime or 9=Other
(N=1415+1390) or unknown (N=57627)
BRFSS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 89
BRFSS
Current Status Choices Study information
BRFSS
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
1= 2010 survey: Q12.5 "Have you ever served
on active duty in the United States Armed
Forces, either in the regular military or in a
National Guard or military reserve unit?"; 2=
2010 survey: Q21.1 (N=1059)
Ethnicity/ Race "Are you Hispanic or Latino?" (Yes=31910,
No=416091); White= 4469, Black= 805, Asian=
673, Pacific Islander= 771, Native American=
795, and others.
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
1 (Q21.2 "Has a doctor or other health
professional ever told you that you have
depression, anxiety, or post traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD)? (N=321)"
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma traumatic brain injury (N=70)
life events 22.1 Adverse Childhood Experience
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A, but "Section 10: Disability"
psychological well-being / distress whether using counseling services, suicidal
ideas, mental health etc
social well-being Section 22: Emotional Support and Life
Satisfaction
economic well-being Module 19: Social Context
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1
COMMENTS In 2011, more than 506,000
interviews were conducted, based on
a BRFSS questionnaire consisting of
three parts: core questions, optional
modules, and state-added questions.
For more survey details, please see current
and past BRFSS questionnaires:
http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires.htm#e
nglish
BRFSS factsheet http://www.cdc.gov/osels/phsipo/docs/pdf/facts
heets/DBS_BRFSS%20History_12_232372_F_
remediated_10_26_2012.pdf
Template v2.11 Jan2014 90
BRFSS
Current Status Choices Study information
BRFSS
Module 21: Veteran’s Health- CATI
note: Ask only if Core Q12.5 = 1 (Yes,
now on active duty) or 2 = (Yes, on
active duty during
the last 12 months, but not now) or 3
= (Yes, on active duty in the past, but
not during the last 12
months).
Added in 2010
Template v2.11 Jan2014 91
ELSA
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name English longitudinal study of aging
Website http://www.ifs.org.uk/ELSA
http://www.natcen.ac.uk/elsa/index.htm
NIA link http://nihlibrary.ors.nih.gov/nia/ps/NIADB_Details.as
p?which=93
other website(s) http://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/catalogue?sn=50
50
part of the HALCyon
program
http://www.halcyon.ac.uk/?q=cohorts-elsa
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA)
study, which began in 2002 (though the sample was
constructed from earlier data) is a longitudinal
survey of ageing and quality of life among older
people. It explores the dynamic relationships
between health and functioning, social networks and
participation, and economic position as people plan
for, move into and progress beyond retirement. The
study is funded jointly by UK government
departments and the National Institute on Aging, in
the USA. The main objectives of ELSA are to: 1)
construct six waves of accessible and well-
documented panel data; 2) provide these data in a
convenient and timely fashion to the scientific and
policy research community; 3) describe health
trajectories, disability and healthy life expectancy in
a representative sample of the English population
aged 50 and over; 4) examine the relationship
between economic position and health; 5)
investigate the determinants of economic position in
older age; 6) describe the timing of retirement and
post-retirement labour market activity; and 7)
understand the relationships between social support,
household structure and the transfer of assets.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
Wave 1: March 2002 - March 2003; Wave 2: June
2004 - July 2005; Wave 3: May 2006 - August 2007;
Wave 4: May 2008 - July 2009; Wave 5: June 2010 -
July 2012; Wave 6: summer 2012 and spring 2013
(ongoing)
Wave 0 data were gathered in the 1998, 1999 and
2001 waves of the HSE, but these predate the
official start of the ELSA study.
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1 (UK)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0
Birth cohort(s) 1948, 1949, and 1951 and earlier: During 1998,
1999, and 2001, households were recruited if having
one adults aged 50 and older.
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 3= Multi-stage stratified random sample
ELSA
Template v2.11 Jan2014 92
ELSA
Current Status Choices Study information
ELSA
Selection criteria for
sample
The ELSA sample was selected from HSE 1998,
1999 and 2001 respondents. Households were
included in ELSA if they contained at least one adult
of 50 years or older in the household who had
agreed to be recontacted at some time in the future
when participating in the HSE. To ensure that ELSA
remained representative of the target population,
'refreshment' samples were included at Waves 3, 4
and 6.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Open (specifically for wave 6)
Method Face-to-face interview; Self-completion; Clinical
measurements; Physical measurements;
Performance measurements, such as the timed
walk, were conducted, and Waves 2 and 4 included
a nurse visit. See documentation for further details
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) Core data: Wave 1: 12,100 cases. Wave 2: 9,433
cases. Wave 3: 9,771 cases (Phase 2 deposit).
Wave 4: 11,050 cases (Phase 2 deposit). Wave 5:
10,274 cases.
Military N N (male), N (female) http://www.esds.ac.uk/findingData/thesaurusInfo.asp
?keyword=MILITARY%20SERVICE
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
2; 3 asked in life history questionnaire at wave 3 of
ELSA: e.g. 1) RSFIRED- Have you ever fired a
weapon in combat or been fired upon? Yes/No, 2)
RSFIREDY- How old were you when it first
happened? 3) RSWITWR- Have you ever witnessed
the serious injury or death of someone in war or
military
action? 4) RSWITRY- How old were you when it
first happened?
Ethnicity/ Race An item for ethnic groups
Assessment of PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures
trauma N/A, but asked about firing a weapon during combat
life events Wave 3 life history interview asked many difficult life
events
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014 93
ELSA
Current Status Choices Study information
ELSA
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A, but included CASP-19 for assessing quality of
life
psychological well-being / distress Ryff Scale of Psychological Wellbeing; CES-D
Depression Scale
social well-being see comments for detailed data in social domain
economic well-being see comments for detailed data in economic domain
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
MRC Respiratory Questionnaire; Edinburgh
Claudication Questionnaire; Rose Angina
Questionnaire; also see comments for detailed data
in health domain
COMMENTS For economic, social and health
domains, there are cross-sectional
tables
and longitudinal tables.
http://www.ifs.org.uk/ELSA/data
Template v2.11 Jan2014 94
DMHDS
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development
Study (DMHDS) (also known as the Dunedin
Study)
Website http://dunedinstudy.otago.ac.nz/
NIA link N/A
other website(s) http://dunedinstudy.otago.ac.nz/studies/main-
study/assessment-phases
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
There are three special features of the DMHDS that
enables it to contribute new knowledge about health
and development. First, the sample represents a
cross-section of the Dunedin population. Second,
very few members of the sample have been lost to
follow-up over the years. Third, and perhaps the
most valuable feature of the Study, has been its
multidisciplinary focus. A comprehensive
assessment of Study members has been carried out
involving, as principal investigators, members of a
wide range of key disciplines concerned with issues
of human health and development. This has resulted
in a large number of studies on a diverse range of
health and development issues.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
Participants were studied at birth (1972-73),
followed up and assessed at the age of three, then
every two years until the age of 15, then at ages 18
(1990-91), 21 (1993-94), 26 (1998-99), 32 (2003-
2005), 38 (2010-2012). It is planned to next see the
Study members at age 44, then again at age 50,
and beyond.
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1 (young New Zealanders)
Current Status
0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0 (nearly 40 years so far) (Sub-studies of the
Dunedin Study include the Family Health History
Study (2003-2006), and the on-going Parenting
Study and Next Generation Study)
Birth cohort(s) 1972-73
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (The babies were first followed up at the age of 3,
and then at 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18, 21, 26 and 32,
called as Phase 3, 5, 7 ...32 respectively. Future
assessments are scheduled for age 38 (2010-2012),
44 and on into the future as Study Members have
their own families, age, and retire.)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
All children born at Dunedin's Queen Mary Hospital
between 1 April 1972 and 31 March 1973 and still
living in Otago at age three were eligible for
membership of the Study sample. The children are
therefore representative of Dunedin children born at
that time, and mroe broadly, children born in the
South Island of New Zealand.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method physical and mental health examination
DMHDS
Template v2.11 Jan2014 95
DMHDS
Current Status Choices Study information
DMHDS
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) N= 1037 babies (M=535, F=502) (1013=singletons,
24=twins). 1014 of the original cohort are still alive
today. http://dunedinstudy.otago.ac.nz/studies/main-
study/assessment-phases/study-members
Military N N (male), N (female) **They literally have only a handful of Study
members who have or are engaged in military
service and as such would never allow data
identifying them as members of their sample and
also having been in the military to be used or
analysed.
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
N/A
Ethnicity/ Race Phase 0: Perinatal, Demographic, Anthropometry
Assessment of PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
Phase 21: Mental Health (cf: a publication on PTSD
for the first 30 years of DMHDS-
http://dunedinstudy.otago.ac.nz/journals/the-
developmental-mental-disorder-histories-of-adults-
with-ptsd-a-prospective-longitudinal-birth-cohort-
study)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures
trauma Most publications using DMHDS focus on traumas in
early years (e.g. search "trauma" on the webpage-
http://dunedinstudy.otago.ac.nz/publications)
life events Phase 32; 38: Update of Life Events
coping Phase 32: Self-Hurt and Coping
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress Phase 26, 32, 38: Emotional Well-being &
Behaviour
social well-being phase 21: Partner Relations
economic well-being Phase 32: Work & Finances
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014 96
DMHDS
Current Status Choices Study information
DMHDS
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1: assessing general health
COMMENTS Three sub-studies http://dunedinstudy.otago.ac.nz/studies/sub-
studies/next-generation-study
Template v2.11 Jan2014 97
DYNOPTA
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name The Dynamic Analyses to Optimise Ageing
(DYNOPTA) project
Website http://dynopta.anu.edu.au/
NIA link N/A
other website(s) http://dynopta.anu.edu.au/Publicsite/Factsheets/ind
ex.php
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
DYNOPTA draws together data from nine Australian
longitudinal studies of ageing with a combined pool
of over 50 000 participants. The collective
information provided by the studies will be used to
identify key incidence rates and risk factors for
health outcomes. DYNOPTA focuses on four
outcomes that significantly contribute to the burden
of disease and disability:dementia and cognition,
mental health, sensory disability, mobility/activity
limitations. DYNOPTA will also develop the first
Australian dynamic microsimulation model that can
forecast the health and social outcomes of the baby
boomer and older cohorts. It also provides an
excellent platform for comparison with similar
datasets from Europe, the United States and Asia.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
commenced in May 2007- ongoing
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1 (3 out of the nine contributing studies) + 2 (the
other 6 contributing studies)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0
Birth cohort(s) Baseline participants N= 50,652 (participating
between 1990 and 2001), aged between 45 and
103 years. Age vary by the 9 contributing studies.
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (Studies have an average of 4 waves over an
average period of 9.4 years) (see the time frame of
these studies-
http://dynopta.anu.edu.au/Publicsite/Contributingstud
ies/timeframe.php)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
Depending on each contributing study
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Vary by each contributing study- questionnaires,
interviews, physical/psychological testings etc.
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) The sample comprises 50,652 baseline participants
(participating between 1990 and 2001) aged
between 45 and 103 years. Of these, 39,085
(77.2%) were female, reflecting inclusion of the all-
female Australian Longitudinal Study of Women’s
Health and women’s greater longevity.
DYNOPTA
Template v2.11 Jan2014 98
DYNOPTA
Current Status Choices Study information
DYNOPTA
Military N N (male), N (female) **DYNOPTA does not currently have veteran’s data.
However, most of the contributing studies do have at
least details on veterans pensions. One may look
into individual contributing studies for military related
variables. Alternatively, in Australia, the Department
of Veteran’s Affairs has oversight for veterans and
their spouses and they may have relevant data for
one's needs. ** Speficially, the Sydney Older
Persons Study (SOPS) is a longitudinal study
examining the health, wellbeing and lifestyle of war
veterans and their widows and non-veterans. (For
details-
http://dynopta.anu.edu.au/Publicsite/Contributingstud
ies/sops.php)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
3
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1
Ethnicity/ Race Need to check with each contributing study
Assessment of PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
Wave 1, 2, 4 of SOPS: medical and
neuropsychological assessments
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
(did not mention specifically)
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma N/A
life events e.g. longitudinal study of women's health (ALSWH)-
life stages and key events (such as childbirth,
divorce, widowhood)
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A, but "disability and service use" instead
psychological well-being / distress Probable dementia and cognitive impairment,
depression (e.g. SOPS)
social well-being Life satisfaction
economic well-being N/A
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014 99
DYNOPTA
Current Status Choices Study information
DYNOPTA
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1= Activities of daily living and current driving, health
and lifestyle (e.g. exercise, smoking and alcohol
consumption in SOPS Wave 1, 2, 4) (SOPS Wave
3 involved taking a blood sample and completing a
medication history) (SOPS Stages 4 and 5 involved
MRI scanning of the brain)
COMMENTS Contributing studies http://dynopta.anu.edu.au/Publicsite/Contributingstud
ies/index.php
The lack of reliable longitudinal
evidence about Indigenous health and
ageing: Older Indigenous Australians
are underrepresented in DYNOPTA
and their small numbers prevent
detailed examination of their health and
well-being using DYNOPTA.
Template v2.11 Jan2014 100
ALSA
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing
Website http://flinders.edu.au/sabs/fcas/alsa/alsa_home.cfm
NIA link http://nihlibrary.ors.nih.gov/nia/ps/NIADB_Details.as
p?which=77
other website(s) http://www.ada.edu.au/longitudinal/browse/australia
n-longitudinal-study-of-ageing
ICPSR http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/
6707%3bjsessionid=263609067110D628DA8D015
1419AEC2B?classification=ICPSR.XVII.D.
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ALSA)
is Australia's first multi-dimensional population based
study of human ageing. The general purpose of the
ALSA study is to gain further understanding of how
social, biomedical and environmental factors are
associated with age related changes in health and
well-being of persons aged 70 years and over.
Emphasis is given in the overall study to defining
and exploring the concept of healthy, active ageing,
particularly in a South Australian context.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
1992- 2010 (total of 11 waves)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
2 (South Australia)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) June 30, 1922 and earlier
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
The participants recruited were aged 70 years and
over in an Australian urban population of both
people living in the general community and those in
special accommodation including nursing homes
and other institutions (as well as their spouses (aged
65 and over), or co residents (aged 70 and over)
(Andrews, Clark et al. 2002)). The participants were
living in the Adelaide Statistical Division (the wider
City of Adelaide). A stratified random sample was
initially drawn by the Australian Bureau if Statistics
from the South Australian Electoral Roll. The sample
was stratified to provide estimated equal numbers in
5-year age and sex cohorts from 70 to 84 years and
over 85 years, taking into account likely household
composition. Males and those aged over 85 were
deliberately over-sampled to provide suffi cient
numbers for longitudinal follow-up.
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
ALSA
Template v2.11 Jan2014 101
ALSA
Current Status Choices Study information
ALSA
Method ` At Baseline, a comprehensive personal interview
and assessment of neuropsychological and
physiological functions was undertaken at each
person's home, supplemented by self-completed
questionnaires, biochemistry, and additional clinical
studies of physical function. Since then a further 10
waves (11 in total as at 2010) have been completed
(some being short telephone interviews).
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) N=2087 @ Wave 1
Military N N (male), N (female) Yes (Male N= 540, Female N=37), No= 1365,
Missing= 145
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
1: Wave 1 variable (armedser): 730. ( U16) Did you
serve in the armed services overseas or in Northern
Australia during war time? Yes/No
Ethnicity/ Race The majority of participants in the ALSA study
reported their country of birth as Australia (68%),
this was followed by 20% of the sample reporting
their ethnic origin as English, Scottish or Irish.
European countries were also stated as the country
of birth by over 9 % of respondents. (see Figure
3.5.1 in The Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing:
15 Years of Ageing in South Australia)
Assessment of PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures
trauma see the section of 6. PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-
BEING: DEPRESSION AND SENSE OF SELF,
the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing: 15
Years of Ageing in South Australia
life events 258. ( P1) The next few questions are about major
events that may have taken place in your life in the
last two years. also assessed in Significant Life
Events (Impact of, Wave 7)
coping
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014 102
ALSA
Current Status Choices Study information
ALSA
VA disability rating N/A but ADL and IADL (For details see 4.
PHYSICAL HEALTH AND FUNCTIONAL
DISABILITY, the Australian Longitudinal Study of
Ageing: 15 Years of Ageing in South Australia)
psychological well-being / distress Self-report: psychological measures of self esteem,
morale and perceived control
social well-being see the section of 3.4 SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS,
the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing: 15
Years of Ageing in South Australia
economic well-being assess "Socioeconomic Circumstances" and "Health
Economics"
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1: nutrition, dental health, and sexual activity; 2:
Biochemical Analysis; 3: Secondary Provider Data
COMMENTS ALSA is one of the contributing studies
in DYNOPTA.
http://dynopta.anu.edu.au/Publicsite/Factsheets/Dyn
opta%20dataset_final.pdf
The Australian Longitudinal Study of
Ageing: 15 Years of Ageing in South
Australia (pdf)
http://www.flinders.edu.au/sabs/fcas-
files/Documents/StudyOfAgeing[1].pdf
Template v2.11 Jan2014 103
BCS70
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70)
Website http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/page.aspx?&sitesectio
nid=795&sitesectiontitle=Welcome+to+the+197
0+British+Cohort+Study+(BCS70)
NIA link N/A
other website(s) http://www.esds.ac.uk/longitudinal/access/versi
onHistories.asp#bcs70
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
Since BCS70 began, there have been seven
full data collection exercises in order to monitor
the cohort members' health, education, social
and economic circumstances.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
Since the birth survey in 1970, there have been
seven ‘sweeps’ of all cohort members at ages 5
(1975), 10 (1980), 16 (1986), 26 (1996), 30
(2000), 34 (2004), 38 (2008) and 42 (collected
from the 1st May 2012 to the 30th April 2013).
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
3
Birth cohort(s) 1970
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
0 + 1
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 3
Selection criteria for
sample
The BCS70 follows the lives of all people born
in England, Scotland and Wales in one
particular week of April 1970 (from 00.01 hours
on Sunday, 5th April to 24.00 hours on
Saturday, 11 April).
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Survey, telephone survey, core interview
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) Total N= 17196: Male (8906), Female (8279)
Military N N (male), N (female) BCS 1996 survey asked participants to fill out
information about their job; BCS 2000 about
employment
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam
(1961-75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-
92) 7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info
on era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military
service
N/A
Ethnicity/ Race N/A
BCS 70
Template v2.11 Jan2014 104
BCS70
Current Status Choices Study information
BCS 70
Assessment of PTSD 1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code;
Have you ever been diagnosed
with/treated for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma (e.g. BCS 2012: trauma was one of the
responses for eyesight problem)
life events N/A
coping BCS 1996: job-related coping
desirable/undesirable effects of
military service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service
or post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress BCS 2000 (a subsection of Mental health in the
Health section); BCS 2012 (life satisfaction)
social well-being BCS 2000 (A section on Relationships; a
section on Family, Social Relationships &
Support); BCS 2002 (e.g. parent-child
relationships)
economic well-being BCS 2008 (A section on Family Income and
Wealth)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1 + 4 (e.g. BCS 1986: Information Manual for
Health Personnel, Parental Questionnaire,
Family Follow-up Form, Maternal Self-
completion Form, Student Self-completion
Health Questionnaire, Medical Examination
Form, Leisure and Activity Diary) (BCS 1996:
self-assessement of general health) (BCS
2000, 2008 a section on health)
COMMENTS UK Data Service http://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/catalogue?s
n=7064#variables
Template v2.11 Jan2014 105
SHARE
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name
Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe
Website http://www.share-project.org/
NIA link http://nihlibrary.ors.nih.gov/nia/ps/NIADB_Details.as
p?which=97
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
SHARE is a multidisciplinary and cross-national
database of micro data on health, socio-economic
status and social and family networks of individuals
aged 50 or over. SHARE is designed after the US
Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the English
Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Comparability
with these surveys is one of the core targets. The
current SHARE project aims at several preparatory
surveys in a selected number of European countries,
culminating in a main prototype survey of about
22,000 households in 11 countries ranging from
Scandinavia (Sweden, Denmark), Western and
Central Europe (France, Belgium, The Netherlands,
Germany, Switzerland, Austria) to the
Mediterranean (Spain, Italy, Greece) are currently
participants. Survey asks about visit to dentist/dental
hygienist in last year, if visit was for treatment or
prevention. Asks about whether dental care is
available, if it is part of insurance. Asks if people
wear dentures and if they do, if they can bite an
apple. For at least 22,000 participants, there is
objective data on strength and other measures of
health and functioning.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
To date, SHARE has collected three panel waves
(2004, 2006, 2010) of current living circumstances
and retrospective life histories (2008, SHARELIFE);
6 additional waves are planned until 2024.
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
4 (within Europe)
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
Birth cohort(s)
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1= Panel study
Sample type
1=random 2=convenience 3=other
3: Eleven countries have contributed data to the
2004 SHARE baseline study. Further data have
been collected in 2005-06 in Israel. Two 'new' EU
member states - the Czech Republic and Poland -
as well as Ireland have joined SHARE in 2006 and
have participated in the second wave of data
collection. A third wave of data (SHARELIFE) has
collected structured life histories of the respondents
from September 2008 through June 2009. Estonia,
Hungary, Luxembourg, Portugal and Slovenia joined
the fourth wave of data collection starting in October
2010.
SHARE
Template v2.11 Jan2014 106
SHARE
Current Status Choices Study information
SHARE
Selection criteria for
sample
European citizens over the age of 50
Open or closed to
enrollment
Open
Method SHARE respondents are interviewed every two
years to monitor changes in these key life areas
over time. The survey’s third wave, SHARELIFE,
collects detailed retrospective life-histories in thirteen
countries in 2008-09 with help of a life history
calendar technique (Börsch-Supan et al., 2011).
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) 45,000 individuals aged 50 or over; for sample
information by waves: http://www.share-
project.org/data-access-documentation/sample.html
Military N N (male), N (female) N/A
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
3= wave 3 questionnaire (asking RE010
SITUATION CHANGED TO, RE003 SITUATION
AT AGE 15 IF NO EDUCATION, RE035
SITUATION IN AFTER LAST JOB - Military
services, war prisoner or equivalent)
Ethnicity/ Race N/A
Assessment of PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures trauma wave 3
life events GL030 CAMP BECAUSE OF REASON FOR
PERSECUTION | | | You told us earlier that you
[lived in a prison/lived in a prisoner of war camp
/lived in labor camp/lived in a concentration
camp/had to do forced labor or were in jail/were
exiled or banished]. GL031 DISPOSSESSED
BECAUSE OF REASON FOR PERSECUTION;
GL033 WHEN PROPERTY TAKEN AWAY | When
was the [first time/next time] that your or your
family’s property was taken away as a result of war
or persecution? GL035 ANOTHER TIME
DISPOSSESSED OF ANY PROPERTY;
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
War pension e.g. EP071_ INCOME SOURCES IN
LAST YEAR Please look at card 24.Have you
received income from any of these sources in the
year 2003?
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
Template v2.11 Jan2014 107
SHARE
Current Status Choices Study information
SHARE
prisoner of war status AC002 SPECIAL EVENTS IN ACCOMODATION:
e.g. 3. Evacuated or relocated during a war 4. Lived
in a prisoner of war camp 5. Lived in prison; AC011
TYPE OF NON-PRIVATE RESIDENCE
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
Traces of war: Almost five percent of Europeans
aged 50+ have experienced persecution during and
after World War II. Such periods of stress and
oppression in early life cause serious negative
effects on health and on job satisfaction during the
entire lifespan. This fact places particular
responsibility on governments to care for those who
experienced persecution;
EP071_IncomeSourcesINCOME FROM PUBLIC
PENSIONS IN LAST YEAR, e.g. public war pension
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
VA disability rating
psychological well-being / distress psychological variables (e.g. psychological health,
well-being, life satisfaction)
social well-being social support variables (e.g. assistance within
families, transfers of income and assets, social
networks, volunteer activities)
economic well-being economic variables (current work activity, job
characteristics, opportunities to work past retirement
age, sources and composition of current income,
wealth and consumption, housing, education)
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
Health variables (e.g. self-reported health, physical
functioning, cognitive functioning, health behaviour,
use of health care facilities, grip strength, walking
speed, peak flow)
COMMENTS The wave 4 survey was conducted
during the interviewer-training of two
survey agencies in Germany and
France. The description of the projects’
conceptual framework and the
questionnaire:
http://surveyinsights.org/?p=817
Kesternich, I., B. Siflinger, J. Smith and
J. Winter. (2012). The effects of World
War II on economic and health
outcomes across Europe. IZA
Discussion Paper (6296). Bonn.
https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/bitstream/10419/58
740/1/715289985.pdf
Template v2.11 Jan2014 108
CLSA
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)
Website http://www.clsa-elcv.ca/
NIA link N/A
other website(s)
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The first and largest national aging study. The
ultimate aim of the CLSA is to find ways to improve
the health of Canadians by better understanding the
aging process and the factors that shape the way
we age. CLSA takes an integrative approach,
examining healthy aging through a number of
different lenses, including the changing biological,
medical, psychological, social, lifestyle and
economic aspects of people’s lives.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
2009- ongoing (every 3 years) (for more details-
http://www.clsa-elcv.ca/milestones)
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
0
Birth cohort(s) 1964 and earlier
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1 (supplemented with some cross-sectional data)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1 (random phone call to recruite participants)
Selection criteria for
sample
Plan to follow approximately 50,000 men and
women between the ages of 45 and 85 for at least
20 years
Open or closed to
enrollment
Open
Method Comprehensive questionnaires, tracking
questionnaires (1-hr telephone interview), physical
assessment, and biospecimen
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) Currently N= 29494
Military N N (male), N (female)
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
Ethnicity/ Race
Assessment of PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
Other measures trauma
life events
CLSA
Template v2.11 Jan2014 109
CLSA
Current Status Choices Study information
CLSA
coping
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
homecoming
unit cohesion/social support
prisoner of war status
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
VA disability rating
psychological well-being / distress
social well-being
economic well-being
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
5: Done at the 11 data collection sites: 1) Physical
assessment to learn about body size and shape. 2)
Bone density and composition to learn about bones,
muscles, and fat. 3) Heart function test to learn
about blood pressure, thickness of arteries, and
heart rate. 4) Strength testing to assess strength in
hands, arms, legs and overall body. 5) Lung test to
learn how the individual’s lungs work. 6) Memory
test to assess how the brain is working. 7) Vision
and Hearing tests to learn about your sight and
hearing. 8) Blood and Urine Samples to learn how
the body is working.
COMMENTS Publications http://www.clsa-elcv.ca/scientific-publications
Veterans’ Physical Health (2012) http://www.clsa-
elcv.ca/files/docs/Veterans%27%20Physical%20He
alth.pdf
Template v2.11 Jan2014 110
HALCyon
Current Status Choices Study information
Study name the Healthy Ageing across the Life Course
(HALCyon)
Website http://www.halcyon.ac.uk/
NIA link N/A
other website(s) http://www.nshd.mrc.ac.uk/collaborations/halcyon.a
spx
Study Goals (summarize briefly the study
objective(s))
The HALCyon focuses on three aspects of healthy
ageing:
1) Physical and cognitive capability - the capacity to
undertake the physical and mental tasks of daily
living; 2) Psychological and social wellbeing - how
people feel and how they function; 3) Biomarkers of
ageing - including cortisol (one of the body's stress
hormones), telomere length (the cell's natural clock
that tells the body how old it is) and genetic factors.
Eight work packages look at how these aspects of
ageing inter-relate and change with age, and how
they are influenced by different lifetime experiences
and circumstances.
Dates of study starting date, date of last contact (or
ongoing)
September 2008 until March 2012
Setting 1=national 2=regional 3=local
4=international
1
Current Status 0=ongoing data collection
1=closed/ended 2=passive (eg
mortality) followup 3=unsure/other
1
Birth cohort(s) Born between 1918 and 1958, aged 50 years and
older at the start of the HALCyon
Design 0=cross-sectional 1=longitudinal
2=multiple cohorts 3=intervention
4=twin 5=other
1+2 (cross-cohort collaboration involving 9 different
cohort studies)
Sample type 1=random 2=convenience 3=other 1
Selection criteria for
sample
Need to check each contributing cohort study
Open or closed to
enrollment
Closed
Method Combine 9 UK cohort studies: quantitative and
qualitative focuses (life history)
Total N at enrollment N (male), N (female) N= 30,000
Military N N (male), N (female) **Need to check each contributing cohort
study**There has been very little information
collected on military service and experience. For
example, in the MRC National Survey of Health and
Development (also known as the 1946 British birth
cohort study), the only data related to military
occupations with those people serving in the military
when occupation was assessed identified (and this
is a small group).
Era/Theater 1=Civil War (1861-1865) 2=WW I
(1917-1918) 3=WWII (1941-1946)
4=Korea (1951-55) 5=Vietnam (1961-
75) 6=Persian Gulf/ODS (1991-92)
7=OIF/OEF (2001-) 8=Peacetime
9=Other
N/A
HALCyon
Template v2.11 Jan2014 111
HALCyon
Current Status Choices Study information
HALCyon
Measures of military
service
1=veteran or not (eg yes no) 2=info on
era/ combat exposure/deployment
3=further information on military service
N/A
Ethnicity/ Race Need to check each contributing cohort study
Assessment of PTSD
1= diagnosis (ICD or DSM code; Have
you ever been diagnosed with/treated
for PTSD?)
N/A
2=clinical interview (1=SCID, 2=DIS,
3=CIDI, 4=CAPS, 5=other)
N/A
3=survey (1=Mississippi, 2=MMPI,
3=PCL, 4=Other)
N/A
Other measures
trauma Life history and healthy ageing (Work Package,
WP3)
life events Life history and healthy ageing (Work Package,
WP3)
coping N/A
desirable/undesirable effects of military
service
N/A
homecoming N/A
unit cohesion/social support N/A
prisoner of war status N/A
use GI benefits (GI Bill for education,
housing, healthcare)
N/A
positive outcomes of military service or
post-traumatic growth
N/A
VA disability rating N/A
psychological well-being / distress Psychological and social wellbeing as WP 2: In
order to facilitate comparable analyses across
cohorts we have not only used existing measures
but also collected data on positive mental wellbeing,
life satisfaction and neighbourhood cohesion using
the same instruments (Warwick Edinburgh Mental
Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS), Diener’s life
satisfaction scale and a subset of questions from the
Neighbourhood Cohesion Scale, respectively) in the
CaPS, HCS, Aberdeen 1936, LBC1921, NSHD and
NCDS cohorts.
social well-being (included in psychological and social wellbeing)
economic well-being Lifetime socioeconomic position in the Physical and
cognitive capability as WP 1
information from military or VA
records?
N/A
health assessment (1=self-report,
2=biomarkers, 3=administrative data,
4=informant report, 5=other)
1, 2, 5: Physical and cognitive capability as WP 1,
nutrition and diet as WP 4, Telomeres as WP 6,
Genetics as WP 7, and HPA axis as WP 8
COMMENTS 8 workpackages - research topics http://www.halcyon.ac.uk/?q=work-packages
Template v2.11 Jan2014 112