acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, litman lab, university of...

48
Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence Jodi Schneider March 29, 2016 Litman Lab, CS, University of Pittsburgh

Upload: jodischneider

Post on 11-Apr-2017

381 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction

knowledge and evidence Jodi Schneider

March 29, 2016Litman Lab, CS, University of Pittsburgh

Page 2: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Problem

o Thousands of preventable medication errors occur each year.

o Clinicians rely on information in drug compendia (Physician’s Desk Reference, Medscape, Micromedex, Epocrates, …).

o Compendia have information quality problems:• differ significantly in their coverage, accuracy, and

agreement• often fail to provide essential management

recommendations about prescription drugs

2

Page 3: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Prescribers check for known drug interactions.

3

Page 4: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Prescribers consult drug interaction references which are maintained by expert pharmacists.

Medscape EpocratesMicromedex 2.0

4

Page 5: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Prescribers consult drug interaction references which are maintained by expert pharmacists.

Medscape EpocratesMicromedex 2.0

Significant discrepancies on drug interactions!

5

Page 6: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Problem

o Drug Compendia synthesize PDDI evidence into knowledge claims but:• Disagree on whether specific evidence items can

support or refute PDDI knowledge claims

Page 7: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Problem

o Drug Compendia synthesize PDDI evidence into knowledge claims but:• Disagree on whether specific evidence items can

support or refute PDDI knowledge claims• May fail to include important evidence

Page 8: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Silos

Post-market studies

Reported in

Scientific literature

Reported in

Pre-market studies Clinical experience

Drug product labels

Page 9: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Goals

o Long-term, provide drug compendia editors with better information and better tools, to create the information clinicians use.

o This talk focuses on how we might efficiently acquire and represent • knowledge claims about medication safety• and their supporting evidence

o in a standard computable format.

Page 10: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

MEDICATION SAFETY DOMAIN

Page 11: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Definitions

o Drug-drug interaction• A biological process that results in a clinically

meaningful change to the response of at least one co-administrated drug.

o Potential drug-drug interaction• POSSIBILITY of a drug-drug interaction• Data from a clinical/physiological study OR

reasonable extrapolation about drug-drug interaction mechanisms

11

Page 12: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Existing approaches: RepresentationBradford-Hill criteria (1965)

1. Strength2. Consistency3. Specificity4. Temporality5. Biological gradient6. Plausibility7. Coherence

Bradford-Hill A. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?. Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:295-300.

12

Page 13: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Existing approaches: Representation

Horn, J. R., Hansten, P. D., & Chan, L. N. (2007). Proposal for a new tool to evaluate drug interaction cases. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 41(4), 674-680.

13

Page 14: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Existing approaches: RepresentationRoyal Dutch Association for the Advancement of Pharmacy (2005)

1. Existence & quality of evidence on the interaction2. Clinical relevance of the potential adverse

reaction resulting from the interaction3. Risk factors identifying patient, medication or

disease characteristics for which the interaction is of special importance

4. The incidence of the adverse reaction

Van Roon, E.N. et al: Clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions: a structured assessment procedure. Drug Saf. 2005;28(12):1131-9.

14

Page 15: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Existing approaches: Representation

Boyce, DIKB, 2006-present 15

Page 16: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Existing approaches: Acquisition

o Evidence

16Boyce, DIKB, circa 2006

Page 17: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

DATA MODEL: REPESENTING KNOWLEDGE

Page 18: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Why is a new data model needed?o Need computer integrationo Want a COMPUTABLE model that can make

inferences

18

Page 19: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Multiple layers of evidence

Medication Safety Studies

Layer

Clinical Studies and Experiments

Scientific Evidence Layer

19

Page 20: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Scientific Evidence Layer: Micropublications

20Clark, Ciccarese, Goble (2014) Micropublications: a semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications

Page 21: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

MP:Claim

21

Page 22: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Building up an MP graph

22

Page 23: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Building up an MP graph

23

Page 24: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Building up an MP graph

24

Page 25: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Building up an MP graph

Page 26: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Building up an MP graph

26

Page 27: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Building up an MP graph

27

Page 28: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Building up an MP graph

28

Page 29: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Building up an MP graph

29

Page 30: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Building up an MP graph

30

Page 31: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Medication Safety Studies Layer: DIDEO

Brochhausen et al, work in progress, example of Clinical Trial

Page 32: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

DIDEO: Drug-drug Interaction and Drug-drug Interaction Evidence Ontology

32https://github.com/DIDEO

Page 33: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

EVIDENCE CURATION: ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE

Page 34: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Hand-extracting knowledge claims and evidence

o Sources• Primary research literature• Case reports• FDA-approved drug labels

o Process• Spreadsheets• PDF annotation

34

Page 35: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

35

Page 36: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

36

Page 37: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

37

Page 38: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

DIRECTIONS & FUTURE WORK

Page 39: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

We are developing a search/retrieval portal It will:o Integrate information (removing silos)o Offer the same information to all compendium

editorso Provide direct access to information

• E.g. quotes in context

Page 40: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

40

Quotes in context!

Page 41: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Evaluation plan for the search/retrieval portalo 20-person user studyo Measures of

• Completeness of information• Level of agreement• Time required• Perceived ease of use

Page 42: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Implications

o Implications for evidence modeling & curationo Implications for ontology development.o Implications for improving medication safety.

Page 43: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Implications for evidence modeling & curationo Evidence modeling & curation is a general

process.o Analogous processes could be used in other

fields.o Biomedical curation is most mature:

structured nature of the evidence interpretation, existing ontologies, trained curators, information extraction and natural language processing pipelines

o Curation pipelines need to be designed with stakeholders in mind.

Page 44: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Thanks to collaborators & funderso Training grant T15LM007059 from the

National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research

o The entire “Addressing gaps in clinically useful evidence on drug-drug interactions” team from U.S. National Library of Medicine R01 grant (PI, Richard Boyce; R01LM011838) and other collaborators

44

Page 45: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

“Addressing gaps in clinically useful evidence on drug-drug interactions”

4-year project, U.S. National Library of Medicine R01 grant (PI, Richard Boyce; R01LM011838)o Evidence panel of domain experts: Carol

Collins, Amy Grizzle, Lisa Hines, John R Horn, Phil Empey, Dan Malone

o Informaticists: Jodi Schneider, Harry Hochheiser, Katrina Romagnoli, Samuel Rosko

o Ontologists: Mathias Brochhausen, Bill Hogano Programmers: Yifan Ning, Wen Zhang, Louisa

Zhang

45

Page 46: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

Jodi Schneider, Mathias Brochhausen, Samuel Rosko, Paolo Ciccarese, William R. Hogan, Daniel Malone, Yifan Ning, Tim Clark and Richard D. Boyce. “Formalizing knowledge and evidence about potential drug-drug interactions.” International Workshop on Biomedical Data Mining, Modeling, and Semantic Integration: A Promising Approach to Solving Unmet Medical Needs (BDM2I 2015) at ISWC 2015 Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.

Jodi Schneider, Paolo Ciccarese, Tim Clark and Richard D. Boyce. “Using the Micropublications ontology and the Open Annotation Data Model to represent evidence within a drug-drug interaction knowledge base.” 4th Workshop on Linked Science 2014—Making Sense Out of Data (LISC2014) at ISWC 2014 Riva de Garda, Italy.

Mathias Brochhausen, Jodi Schneider, Daniel Malone, Philip E. Empey, William R. Hogan and Richard D. Boyce “Towards a foundational representation of potential drug-drug interaction knowledge.” First International Workshop on Drug Interaction Knowledge Representation (DIKR-2014) at the International Conference on Biomedical Ontologies (ICBO 2014) Houston, Texas, USA.

Richard D. Boyce, John Horn, Oktie Hassanzadeh, Anita de Waard, Jodi Schneider, Joanne S. Luciano, Majid Rastegar-Mojarad, Maria Liakata, “Dynamic Enhancement of Drug Product Labels to Support Drug Safety, Efficacy, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Biomedical Semantics. 4(5), 2013. doi:10.1186/2041-1480-4-5

Page 47: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29
Page 48: Acquiring and representing drug-drug interaction knowledge and evidence, Litman Lab, University of Pittsburgh, 2016-03-29

o Evidence

48

7.19 Drugs Metabolized by Cytochrome P4502D6In vitro studies did not reveal an inhibitory effect of escitalopram on CYP2D6.