72 | August 2013 mddionline.com

Testing

Imag

es c

ourte

sy o

f sON

OsCA

N IN

C.

Acoustic Screening and Analysis of PEMs for Medical ApplicationsUltrasound can be used as a tool to test the reliability of medical electronics components. ToM AdAMS

U ltrasound’s sensitivity to mate-rial interfaces makes it useful in screening plastic-encapsulated

microcircuits (PEMS) and other compo-nents used in the assembly of medical elec-tronics products. The purpose of screening is to identify and remove from production individual components that contain inter-nal structural defects that could cause elec-trical failure of the component and compro-mise the functioning of the product.

Acoustic microscopes are used to carry out this screening because the high fre-quency and ultrahigh frequency ultrasound they employ does not damage or alter the components. The acoustic images that are produced by the microscopes depend on the fact that ultrasound is reflected by the interfaces between materials. When the scanning transducer of an acoustic micro-scope sends a pulse of ultrasound into a sample, there are three possible outcomes:

■■ If the sample is homogeneous (a defect-free block of ceramic, for example) no ultrasound will be reflected from the sample’s interior because there are no material interfaces.

■■ If the pulse strikes the bonded interface between two solid materials (a polymer and a metal in a PEM, for example), a portion of the pulse will be reflected to the transducer for imaging, and a portion will be transmitted across the bonded interface and will travel deeper until it reaches the next interface.

■■ If the pulse strikes a delaminated or non-bonded interface between two solid mate-

rials, it is actually encountering the inter-face between the first solid material and a gas such as air. More than 99.99% of the pulse will be reflected, even if the delami-nation or nonbond is as thin as 0.01 μ. The high amplitude negative echo is caused solely by the solid-to-gas interface and is typical of gap-type structural defects such as nonbonds, delaminations, and voids—all of which are of interest because they are capable of causing the eventual electrical failure of the component.

Using an acoustic microscope to scan trays of PEMs increases the long-term re-liability of the product by removing ques-tionable components. The reliability re-quirements of medical products are often similar to those of military and aerospace products. In these industries, some ap-plications permit internal anomalies that appear harmless, while others permit no internal anomalies at all. Manufacturers of medical electronics systems may also

use IPC/JEDEC, JEDEC, NASA or Mil STDS standards that place limits on the types, locations, and number of defects in a PEM based on reliability concerns.

Acoustic scanning of PEM lots is often performed by a laboratory acoustic micro-scope. Laboratory C-SAM systems are basi-cally analytical tools rather than production tools, but they are capable of handling the typically small lot sizes involved in medical electronics production. The PEMs are gen-erally manually loaded into a suitable tray and scanned; a high throughput rate is not as important as identification and removal of defective components.

Acoustic screening can also be impor-tant for FDA approval of a medical product. When a product is being redesigned, acous-tic screening may be necessary to justify the use of a new or different PEM. In practice, a lot of PEMs may be scanned twice. Dur-ing the initial scan the transducer pulses ultrasound into the PEM, but signals are collected only by a sensor below the PEM.

Figure 1. Red areas in this acoustic image show a lack of bonding between the mold compound and the lead fingers and die paddle before (left) and after thermal cycling (right).

MD+DI MEDICAL DEVICE AND DIAGNOSTIC INDUSTRY August 2013 | 73

Delaminations and other gaps reflect ultra-sound upward, with the result that what ar-rives at the sensor below is a dark acoustic shadow of the defect. These transmission-mode images give no depth information about the feature creating the shadow, but they are a fast way to find most gap-type defects.

Reflection-mode imaging is used next. The transducer pulses ultrasound into the sample but in this case receives the echoes from solid-to-solid and solid-to-air inter-faces a few millionths of a second later. The echoes are gated on (encompass) the bulk of the PEM body, which is typically thin enough for the ultrasound to be in focus over the entire vertical extent of the PEM with a properly selected transducer.

How likely a given anomaly is to cause an eventual electrical open or short depends on which type of anomaly it is and its lo-cation. In general, unless reliability studies have been performed, it is often difficult to accurately predict the future behavior of an anomaly. During their service life, De-laminations, nonbonds, and voids often expand, which is a typical cause of broken connections and overheated die. They are also points where moisture and contami-nants that penetrate the mold compound collect and form tiny electrolytic cells that initiate corrosion.

Figure 1 shows the reflection-mode acoustic image of a PEM in its original state (left) and after 1000 thermal test cycles (right). The red areas are high-amplitude reflections from delaminations or other gap-type defects. Testing, which was designed to produce the effects of normal thermal cycling in an accelerated format, has caused the original defects to grow and has created new defects. Most of

Using an acoustic microscope to scan trays of

PEMs increases the long-term reliability of the product by removing questionable components.

267.733.0200 x 238

Sales@PulseTechInc.com

PulseTechnologies.com

Could your next orthopedic device use a thinner and lighter

but stronger alloy? Or a smoother surface, or a rougher surface,

or an easier-to-bond-to surface? Or a faster-than-you-thought-

possible prototype? We keep going until we’ve created the

solution that will accelerate your business. Think of Pulse

Technologies as ideas + execution. Groundbreaking materials,

technologies and processes. Full capabilities in component

manufacturing and assembly. From prototype to production.

Then, do what’s good for business. Call us.

how many do you need?

[[

©2

012

Pu

lse

Te

ch

no

log

ies, In

c.

how many great ideascan we fit inside one medical device?

74 | August 2013 mddionline.com

Testing

the defects on the left side are delamina-tions along the top surface of lead fingers. Because no defect extends the full length of the lead finger, allowing ingression, these would meet the standards of J-STD-020, an IPC/JEDEC joint standard.

The square feature at the center of each image is the die. On the left, there is a faint yellow line where the die meets the die paddle. Although innocent in ap-pearance—it might just mark the bound-ary of two materials—this yellow feature probably represents the early stages of the red area surrounding the die in the image to the right. This red area shows that the mold compound has separated from the die paddle. The risk is that this delamina-tion will extend under the die into the die attach, where a delamination can cause the die to overheat and fail. In addition, any wire bonds to the paddle will be sub-jected to stresses that may lead to a break in the wire interconnect.

In some medical products, some anoma-lies may be acceptable. Figure 2 is a simpli-fied side-view diagram of a plastic-pack-aged BGA. Anomaly 1 is an isolated void in

the mold compound, not adjacent to wires, leads, or other important elements. Its fu-ture behavior depends on the type of mold compound, the environment in which it is used, and other factors, but, in general, such a void is very unlikely to cause a failure.

Anomaly 2 is a delamination or nonbond between the die face and the mold com-pound. The die face is one of the worst pos-sible locations for an anomaly because it is very likely to expand and break nearby wire bonds. The die face also acts as a reservoir for contaminants that can corrode the met-allization on the surface of the die. Anomaly 3, a delamination or nonbond in the die at-tach material, prevents the removal of heat from the die. Anomaly 4 is a delamination within the interposer/substrate, which can also prevent heat transfer or cause an inter-connect failure. Although ultrasound must pass through multiple materials to reach this depth and be reflected, such anoma-lies—which are dangerous—can usually be imaged. Anomaly 5 is a delamination/nonbond between the mold compound and the leads, but is near a wire bond and therefore a reliability threat. If this package were a flip chip BGA, a defect like Anomaly 5 might be acceptable.

Of these five anomalies, Anomaly 1 would probably be acceptable in many ap-plications but perhaps not in implantable devices. Anomalies 2, 3, 4, and 5 would

almost certainly be cause for rejection.Simply identifying these defects is acous-

tic screening; determining what process deviations caused them to be there is ana-lytical work. There are many acoustic tech-niques for analyzing features in samples. Global manufacturer of process control

and factory automation solutions

For more information:

Call: 1-800-Go-Festo 1-800-463-3786

www.festo.com/us/labautomation

Leading Manufacturer of Automation Products & Solutions

Your Partner for the Life Science, Lab Automation and Medical Device Industry

q� Motion Control specialists

in electro-mechanical and

pneumatic technology

q� ,QQRYDWLYH�OHDGHUV�ZLWK�HIąFLHQW�

piezo-electric valves

q� Designing platforms to create

more control & increase

throughput in medical research

q� Technical training programs –

PLC, mechanical & pneumatic

q� Global support in 176 countries

Figure 2. This diagrammatic side view shows defects (red) in a plastic BGA. Defect 1 is probably harmless, but all the others pose risks.

Figure 3. Images from gates 24 and 25 (from a total of 50) in this PEM reveal lead finger delaminations and problem areas on the die surface.

MD+DI MEDICAL DEVICE AND DIAGNOSTIC INDUSTRY August 2013 | 75

The high-throughput production system mentioned earlier has a software tool that permits making successive images at spe-cific thin-slice depths moving downward through the PEM. Just as the return echo signals can be gated on the whole thickness of a PEM in order to find anomalies and de-fects at any depth, echoes can be gated by this tool on very thin depths. The number of depths can be as many as 200 (probably too many for analyzing a PEM), meaning that a single gated depth can be a small fraction of a millimeter in thickness. Typically, the gates are all of the same thickness and are adjacent to each other, but many other ar-rangements can be selected.

Figure 3 shows two of the 50 thin slices into which one PEM was divided. Count-ing from the top surface of the PEM, these two images show depths 24 and 25. Each gate is 36 μ thick. To image each thin slice of the BGA, only the echoes that arrive at the transducer in a time frame (measured in nanoseconds) that matches the gate are used. (The 23 gates above this chiefly show the mold compound and, nearer to the die, the tops of the wire loops.)

Gate 24 is on the left and shows some red areas (arrow) that might be of concern. There are also red areas around the wire bonds at the inner ends of the leads.

Gate 25 brings the lead fingers into focus and reveals numerous red delaminations (arrows) that are long enough to be worri-some. The wire bond areas also look delam-inated in this image, as does part of the die face. Careful acoustic imaging of this PEM has revealed several problematic features and their precise depths.

This approach is useful, for example, when initial reflection-mode imaging, which includes most or all of the PEM’s thickness in a single gate, spots a void in

In general, unless reliability studies

have been performed, it is often difficult to accurately

predict the future behavior of an

anomaly.

Every order ships with a

It’s the decades of melting experience that translate into a wider range of nitinol alloys. �e enthusiastic engineer-to-engineer collaborations.

Or the extra hustle to meet your deadline.

nitinol from melt to market

What’s the + you’re looking for?

plus@memry.com or call 866 Go Memry Memry + Memry GmbH + SAES Smart Materials

©2011 Memry. All rights reserved.

76 | August 2013 mddionline.com

Testing

the same x-y location as lead fingers. A void that is in contact with or between lead fingers is likely to initiate corrosion that will eventually create a short between the lead fingers. Thin-slice imaging can show the real depth of the void in rela-tion to the lead fingers. It may reveal that the void is well above the lead fingers and relatively harmless.

There are numerous other specific tech-niques (such as measuring the flatness of a BGA package, or the thickness of a material layer) that can be used to solve particular

problems. Acoustic screening and subse-quent analysis are useful tools in achieving overall reliability in medical electronics.

Tom Adams is a writer and photographer based in New Jersey. He has written more than 500 articles for technical and scientific trade magazines.

His articles have appeared in more than 50 magazines in 15 countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. He can be reached at teadams@earthlink.net. 2www.masterbond.com

Hackensack, NJ 07601 USA

+1.201.343.8983

main@masterbond.com

gowith

the

flow

Two Part

EP30Med

Adhesive, sealant, coating, potting compound

ì�Superb optical clarity

ì�Meets USP Class VI specifications

Low Viscosity Epoxy Resin System

Common Questions About Acoustic Microimaging What is the difference between acoustic microimaging (AMI) and x-ray?AMI and x-ray are complementary techniques that are both frequently found in the same labo-ratories. they have important differences with regard to what they reveal in a sample. X-rays can be used to see inside a sample based on material density differences. Dense materials are more opaque to x-radiation, and penetra-tion is more limited through metals compared with ceramics or polymers. Because air is not absorbing delaminations, cracks and disbonds cannot be seen unless there is sufficient physi-cal separation of materials. Radiography oper-ates in a through transmission mode that gives a composite image of the entire sample thick-ness. Radiation from an x- ray source may cause damage or random electrical errors to occur in certain semiconductor devices if they are placed too close to the source for an extended period of time during inspection.

Acoustic waves will penetrate both dense and light solid materials but are very sensitive to the presence of air gaps that can block ultra-sound transmission. the integrity of bonding between layers is a unique capability of AMI. In addition to visualizing interior features of samples, C-sAM produces images on a layer by layer basis. Images are made in a reflection mode that requires access to only one surface of a sample, or in transmission that requires access to opposite surfaces (like x-ray).

Will AMI damage my part?No, the ultrasonic frequencies used for AMI are higher (MHz range) than those used for ultra-sonic cleaning (KHz range) and, because cavita-tion is not produced in this range, there will be no cleaning or agitation to the fragile components.

On what kind of materials can AMI be used?ultrasound travels through practically all solid materials as long as there are no air gaps. Porosity in a material will cause sound waves to become attenuated more than if the material is fully densified and this phenom-enon can be used to quantify the densifica-tion such as for ceramics and powder metal-lurgy samples. In general, the penetration of ultrasound in all solid materials is reduced at higher frequencies.

What is the smallest defect that I can see?In the z (depth) direction, AMI is sensitive to separations as small as 200 Angstroms. In the x-y directions, the resolution is based on the ultrasonic frequency and the design of the transducer. typically, the resolution is about 250 microns for 10 MHz, 75 µ for 30 MHz, 25 µ for 100 MHz, and 10 µ for 230 MHz. However, a transducer can actually detect defects smaller than its resolution by an order of magnitude. You may not be able to “resolve” the defect, but you can “detect” that it is there.

What is the difference between AMI and medical ultrasound?Medical ultrasound and AMI are based on the same physics. However, medical ultra-sound frequencies are usually in the range of 1–5 MHz whereas AMI are 15–300MHz. the lower frequencies are needed in the medical environment because of the need to penetrate tissue thicknesses associated with the human body. there is an inverse relationship between penetration and resolu-tion capability (frequency). source: sonoscan