acid placement and diversion

33
Acid Placement and Diversion Behzad Hosseinzadeh 1 Spring 2015 Number of slides : 33 Supervisor: Dr. Aghighi

Upload: behzad-hosseinzadeh

Post on 05-Aug-2015

67 views

Category:

Engineering


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Acid Placement and Diversion

1

Acid Placement and Diversion Behzad Hosseinzadeh

Spring 2015 Number of slides : 33Supervisor: Dr. Aghighi

Page 2: Acid Placement and Diversion

2

IntroductionAcidization

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 3: Acid Placement and Diversion

3

IntroductionSandStone Vs. Carbonate

SandStone

Carbonate

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 4: Acid Placement and Diversion

4

IntroductionTwo Reason Why Acid Treatments Fail

Acid-removable damage is not presentIf it is present it is not fully contacted

o Acid does not go where it needs to go

Before acid treatment After acid treatment (without diverter)

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 5: Acid Placement and Diversion

5

IntroductionDiverting

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 6: Acid Placement and Diversion

6

Acid PlacementObjectives of Acid Placement and Diversion

1. Coverage of the production or injection interval(s) targeted for acid treatment

2. Distribution (spread) of the acid treatment in the formation.

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 7: Acid Placement and Diversion

7

Acid Placement, In The WellBoreMethods

1. Bullhead injection (MAPDIR Method)

2. Mechanical placement3. Chemical diversion4. Protective Injection

Maximize Coverage … Minimize Volumes

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 8: Acid Placement and Diversion

8

MethodsThe MAPDIR Technique

• maximum pressure differential and injection rate• This was first introduced by Paccaloni and Tambi • Referred to as Paccaloni’s method• limited zone height, length and permeability variation• Openhole, or liner completions in single or multiple

zones, as well as in thin zones

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 9: Acid Placement and Diversion

9

Mechanical MethodsPacker / Bridge Plug.

• The surest way to place fluid• Earliest mechanical method• Retrievable and Permanent• Types

• Cup type packers• Mechanical packers• Inflatable packers

• Expensive• Need kind of intervention,

such as a workover

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 10: Acid Placement and Diversion

10

Mechanical MethodsBall Sealers

• Most widely used• More economic• Overcome drag forces• Suitable for high

permeability contrast• Efficiently in vertical

wells. • larger than perforation• Rubber or Biopolymer

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 11: Acid Placement and Diversion

11

Mechanical MethodsBall Sealers

• Type• Sinkers (non-buoyant balls) • Floaters (buoyant balls) • Neutral buoyant

Floaters

Neutral

Sinkers

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 12: Acid Placement and Diversion

12

Mechanical MethodsJetting

• The acid can be placed directly at the point where it is needed.

• Ease with which an acid injection can be terminated

• Most completions• With foam provides

excellent zone coverage• Rotary action required

• For perforation coverage• For screen or open hole coverage

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 13: Acid Placement and Diversion

13

Chemical MethodsChemical Diversion

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 14: Acid Placement and Diversion

14

Chemical MethodsChemical Diversion

• The more commonly used chemical diverters today include:

1. Salt granules• Low solubility in strong acid but soluble

in formation water• Not be used in a formation that does

not produce water• Combined particulates, such as

graded rock salt and benzoic acid

• Work best in perforated casingand with medium permeability contrast.

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 15: Acid Placement and Diversion

15

Chemical MethodsChemical Diversion

2. Benzoic acid• The most broadly applicable diverter type• Has limited solubility in both oil and water• It has the ability to sublime directly into its gaseous state,

above about +/- 230 °F.• Benzoic acid particulates are typically added to water or acid-

based carrier fluids (a surfactant may be required for dispersal)

• Removal is either by slow dissolution in produced oil (preferred) or water, or through sublimation at higher temperatures.

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 16: Acid Placement and Diversion

16

Chemical MethodsChemical Diversion

3. Waxes• These materials are usually removed from the well by either

the action of temperature, dissolution in liquid hydrocarbons or both.

4. Oil-soluble resins (OSR) • Are not as popular today as they used to be

5. Gilsonite• Naturally-occurring asphalt material

6. Fiber• Effective diverting agents for both matrix and fracture

treatments

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 17: Acid Placement and Diversion

17

Chemical MethodsChemical Diversion

6. Foam• It is useful in gravel pack completions

7. Viscous pills• Polymer gels, such as hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC)• Which can provide sufficient diversion• Remaining gel residue in perforations can block flow.• A separate treatment may have to be conducted to remove

the gel.

The major benefit of foams and gels relative to particulates is their reversibility.

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 18: Acid Placement and Diversion

18

Chemical MethodsChemical Diversion

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 19: Acid Placement and Diversion

19

Diversion MethodsProtective Injection

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 20: Acid Placement and Diversion

20

Diversion MethodsAcid Fracturing Treatments

• Many of the techniques described in the preceding sections also can be applied to acid-fracturing operations.

• Mechanical isolation methods work particularly well, although this often involves extra expense, such as for a workover or for specialized completions.

• This often is accomplished with the use of diversion stages programmed into the treatment schedule, effectively breaking up a large treatment into several smaller ones.

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 21: Acid Placement and Diversion

21

Acid Diversion in the FormationIn-situ diversion

• In-situ diversion is also necessary and quite important in both matrix and fracture acid treatments.

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 22: Acid Placement and Diversion

22

Acid Diversion in the FormationFoam

• Foam is a two-phase, gas-in-liquid emulsion consisting of a liquid external phase and a gaseous internal phase.

• They observed that successful diversion can be expected for permeability ratios less than 10:1.

• A surfactant is required to keep the foam stable until it enters the formation.

• Work better in higher-permeability formations.• Oil tends to destroy foams

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 23: Acid Placement and Diversion

23

Acid Diversion in the FormationFoam

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 24: Acid Placement and Diversion

24

Acid Diversion in the FormationFoam

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 25: Acid Placement and Diversion

25

Acid Diversion in the FormationSelf-Viscosifying Acids (SVA)

• Has three specific components:1. Gelling agent2. Crosslinking agent (Fe, Al, Zr)3. Breaker

• no H2S and permeability greater than 50 md.

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 26: Acid Placement and Diversion

26

Acid Diversion in the FormationSelf-Viscosifying Acids (SVA)

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Live partially neutralized, spent acid

Page 27: Acid Placement and Diversion

27

Acid Diversion in the FormationSelf-Viscosifying Acids (SVA)

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 28: Acid Placement and Diversion

28

Acid Diversion in the FormationViscoelastic surfactant systems (VES)

• VES systems designed for matrix or acid fracturing operations exhibit viscosity as a function of acid strength

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 29: Acid Placement and Diversion

29

Acid Diversion in the FormationViscoelastic surfactant systems (VES)

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 30: Acid Placement and Diversion

30

Acid Diversion in the FormationComparing VES - SVA

• Why do we use VES instead of SVA?1. No residue 2. Completion brines3. No damage

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 31: Acid Placement and Diversion

31

Acid Diversion in the FormationViscous Fingering

Relies on viscosity contrast between acid and non-acid fluidsIntroduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 32: Acid Placement and Diversion

32

Acid Diversion Summarizes

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

MAPDIR

Mechanical

Chemical

Protective

Acid Fracturing

In-situ

Summarizes

Page 33: Acid Placement and Diversion

33

References

1. L.J. Kalfayan, The Art and Practice of Acid Placement and Diversion: History, Present State and Future, 2009

2. Ragi Poyyara, Optimization of Acid Treatments by Assessing Diversion Strategies in Carbonate and Sandstone Formations , 2014

3. Leonard J. Kalfayan, The Art and Practice of Acid Placement and Diversion, 2005

4. Leonard Kalfayan, Production enhancement with acid stimulation, 2nd ed, 2007

5. Javier Ballinas, Weatherfird, Viscous Fingering Stimulation Option Applied on Heavy-Oil Carbonate Reservoirs, 2014

6. M.G. Bernadlner, Effect of Foams Used During Carbonate Acidizing, 19927. Liang Jin, Optimising Diversion and Pumping Rate To Effectively Stimulate Long

Horizontal Carbonate Gas Wells, 20078. G. Glasbergen, Design and Field Testing of a Truly Novel Diverting Agent , 2006