accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Week 7b. Language Universals,part one
CAS LX 400Second Language Acquisition
![Page 2: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Typological universals
• 1960’s and 1970’s saw a lot of activity aimed at identifying language universals, properties of Language.
• Class of possible languages is smaller than you might think.
• If a language has one property (A), it will necessarily have another (B).– +A+B, –A–B, –A+B but never +A–B.
![Page 3: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
(Typological) universals
• All languages have vowels.
• If a language has VSO as its basic word order, then it has prepositions (vs. postpositions).
VSO?Adposition type
Yes (VSO) No
Prepositions Welsh English
Postpositions None Japanese
![Page 4: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Markedness• Having duals implies having plurals• Having plurals says nothing about having duals.
• Having duals is marked—infrequent, more complex. Having plurals is (relative to having duals) unmarked.
• Generally markedness is in terms of comparable dimensions, but you could also say that being VSO is marked relative to having prepositions.
![Page 5: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Berlin & Kay 1969: Color terms
• (On the boundaries of psychophysics, linguistics, anthropology, and with issues about its interpretation, but still…)
• Basic color terms across languages.• It turns out that languages differ in how
many color terms count as basic. (blueish, salmon-colored, crimson, blond, … are not basic).
![Page 6: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Berlin & Kay 1969: Color terms• The segmentation of experience by speech symbols is
essentially arbitrary. The different sets of words for color in various languages are perhaps the best ready evidence for such essential arbitrariness. For example, in a high percentage of African languages, there are only three “color words,” corresponding to our white, black, red, which nevertheless divide up the entire spectrum. In the Tarahumara language of Mexico, there are five basic color words, and here “blue” and “green” are subsumed under a single term.– Eugene Nida (1959)
![Page 7: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Berlin & Kay 1969: Color terms
• Arabic (Lebanon)• Bulgarian (Bulgaria)• Catalan (Spain)• Cantonese (China)• Mandarin (China)• English (US)• Hebrew (Israel)• Hungarian (Hungary)• Ibibo (Nigeria)• Indonesian (Indonesia)
• Japanese (Japan)• Korean (Korea)• Pomo (California)• Spanish (Mexico)• Swahili (East Africa)• Tagalog (Philippines)• Thai (Thailand)• Tzeltal (Southern Mexico)• Urdu (India)• Vietnamese (Vietnam)
![Page 8: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Eleven possible basic color terms
• White, black, red, green, yellow, blue, brown, purple, pink, orange, gray.
• All languages contain term for white and black.• Has 3 terms, contains a term for red.• Has 4 terms, contains green or yellow.• Has 5 terms, contains both green and yellow.• Has 6 terms, contains blue.• Has 7 terms, contains brown.• Has 8 or more terms, chosen from {purple, pink,
orange, gray}
![Page 9: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Color hierarchy
• White, black• Red• Green, yellow• Blue• Brown• Purple, pink, orange, gray
• Even assuming these 11 basic color terms, there should be 2048 possible sets—but only 22 (1%) are attested.
![Page 10: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Color terms
• BW Jalé (New Guinea) ‘brilliant’ vs. ‘dull’• BWR Tiv (Nigeria), Australian aboriginals in
Seven Rivers District, Queensland.• BWRG Ibibo (Nigeria), Hanunóo (Philippines)• BWRY Ibo (Nigeria), Fitzroy River people (Queensland)• BWRYG Tzeltal (Mexico), Daza (eastern Nigeria)• BWRYGU Plains Tamil (South India), Nupe (Nigeria), Mandarin?• BWRYGUO Nez Perce (Washington), Malayalam (southern India)
![Page 11: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Color terms• Interesting questions abound, including why this
order, why these eleven—and there are potential reasons for it that can be drawn from the perception of color spaces which we will not attempt here.
• The point is: This is a fact about Language: If you have a basic color term for blue, you also have basic color terms for black, white, red, green, and yellow.
![Page 12: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Implicational hierarchy• This is a ranking of markedness or an implicational
hierarchy.• Having blue is more marked than having (any or all of)
yellow, green, red, white, and black.• Having green is more marked than having red…• Like a set of implicational universals…
– Blue implies yellow Brown implies blue– Blue implies green Pink implies brown– Yellow or green imply red Orange implies brown– Red implies black Gray implies brown– Red implies white Purple implies brown
![Page 13: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
L2A?• Our overarching theme:
How much is L2/IL like a L1?• Do IL/L2 languages obey the language
universals that hold of native languages?• This question is slightly less theory-laden than
the questions we were asking about principles and parameters, although it’s similar…
• To my knowledge nobody has studied L2 acquisitions of color terms…
![Page 14: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Question formation• Declarative: John will buy coffee.
• Wh-inversion: What will John buy?• Wh-fronting: What will John buy?• Yes/No-inversion: Will John buy coffee?
• Greenberg (1963):– Wh-inversion implies Wh-fronting.– Yes/No-inversion implies Wh-inversion.
![Page 15: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Wh-inversion→Wh-fronting• English, German: Both.
– What will John buy?
• Japanese Korean: neither.– John will buy what?
• Finnish: Wh-fronting only.– What John will buy?
• Unattested: Wh-inversion only.– *Will John buy what?
![Page 16: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Y/N-inversion→Wh-inversion
• English: Both– Will John buy coffee? What will John buy?
• Japanese: Neither– John will buy coffee? John will buy what?
• Lithuanian: Wh-inversion only.– John will buy coffee? What will John buy?
• Unattested: Y/N-inversion only.– Will John buy coffee? What John will buy?
![Page 17: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Eckman, Moravcsik, Wirth (1989)
• L1: Korean (4), Japanese (6), Turkish (4)• L2: English
• Note L1s chosen because they are neither/neither type languages, to avoid questions of transfer.
• Subjects tried to determine what was going on in a scene by asking questions.
![Page 18: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Eckman, Moravcsik, Wirth (1989)
• Example Y/N Qs:– Did she finished two bottle wine?– Is Lou and Patty known each other?– Sue does drink orange juice?– Her parents are rich?– Is this story is chronological in a order?– Does Joan has a husband?– Yesterday is Sue did drink two bottles of wine?
![Page 19: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Eckman, Moravcsik, Wirth (1989)
• Example Wh-Qs:– Why Sue didn’t look solution for her problem?– Where Sue is living?– Why did Sue stops drinking?– Why is Patty’s going robbing the bank?– What they are radicals?– What Sue and Patty connection?– Why she was angry?
![Page 20: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Eckman, Moravcsik,
Wirth (1989)
wh-inversionimplies
wh-fronting?
results
% WHINV % WHFR
SM K 25 NO 100 YES
UA T 54 NO 100 YES
TS J 70 NO 100 YES
MK K 80 NO 100 YES
RO J 88 NO 100 YES
KO J 95 YES 100 YES
MH J 95 YES 100 YES
NE T 95 YES 100 YES
SI J 95 YES 100 YES
G T 100 YES 100 YES
MA T 100 YES 100 YES
ST J 100 YES 100 YES
TM K 100 YES 100 YES
YK J 100 YES 100 YES
![Page 21: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Eckman, Moravcsik,
Wirth (1989)
YN-inversionimplies
wh-inversion?
results
% YNINV % WHINV
SM K 8 NO 25 NO
MK K 38 NO 80 NO
YK J 51 NO 100 YES
TS J 67 NO 70 NO
TM K 83 NO 100 YES
RO J 85 NO 88 NO
BG T 86 NO 100 YES
MA T 88 NO 100 YES
UA T 91 YES 54 NO
KO J 93 YES 95 YES
MH J 95 YES 95 YES
NE T 100 YES 95 YES
SI J 100 YES 95 YES
ST J 100 YES 100 YES
![Page 22: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Eckman, Moravcsik, Wirth (1989)
Yes/no inversionWh-inversion
Yes (VS) No (SV)
Yes (VS) 5 4
No (SV) 1 4
![Page 23: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Eckman’s Markedness Differential Hypothesis
• Markedness. A phenomenon or structure X in some language is relatively more marked than some other phenomenon or structure Y if cross-linguistically the presence of X in a language implies the presence of Y, but the presence of Y does not imply the presence of X.– Duals imply plurals.– Wh-inversion implies wh-fronting.– Blue implies red.
![Page 24: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Markedness Differential Hypothesis• MDH: The areas of difficulty that a second language
learner will have can be predicted on the basis of a comparison of the NL and TL such that:– Those areas of the TL that are different from the NL and
are relatively more marked than in the NL will be difficult;
– The degree of difficulty associated with those aspects of the TL that are different and more marked than in the NL corresponds to the relative degree of markedness associated with those aspects;
– Those areas of the TL that are different than the NL but are not relatively more marked than in the NL will not be difficult.
![Page 25: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
MDH vs. CAH
– Those areas of the TL that are different from the NL and are relatively more marked than in the NL will be difficult;
• The MDH is a bit better than its predecessor, the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis because it anticipates (and attempts to systematically predict) that not every difference between TL and NL cause learners difficulty.
![Page 26: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
MDH example:Word-final segments
• Voiced obstruents most marked Surge
• Voiceless obstruents Coke
• Sonorant consonants Mountain
• Vowels least marked Coffee
• All Ls allow vowels word-finally—some only allow vowels. Some (e.g., Mandarin, Japanese) allow only vowels and sonorants. Some (e.g., Polish) allow vowels, sonorants, but only voiceless obstruents. English allows all four types.
![Page 27: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Eckman (1981)
Spanish L1 Mandarin L1
Gloss IL form Gloss IL form
Bob [b p] Tag [tæg ]
Bobby [b bi] And [ænd ]
Red [rεt] Wet [w t]
Wet [w t] Deck [dεk]Sick [sIk] Letter [lεt r]
Bleeding [blidIn]
c
c
e
e
e
e
e
![Page 28: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
MDH example:Word-final segments
• Voiced obstruents most marked Surge• Voiceless obstruents Coke• Sonorant consonants Mountain• Vowels least marked Coffee
• Idea: Mandarin has neither voiceless nor voiced obstruents in the L1—using a voiceless obstruent in place of a TL voiced obstruent is still not L1 compliant and is a big markedness jump. Adding a vowel is L1 compliant. Spanish has voiceless obstruents, to using a voiceless obstruent for a TL voiced obstruent is L1 compliant.
![Page 29: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
MDH and IL• The MDH presupposes that the IL obeys the
implicational universals too.• Eckman et al. (1989) suggests that this is at least
reasonable.• The MDH suggests that there is a natural order
of L2A along a markedness scale (stepping to the next level of markedness is easiest).
• Let’s consider what it means that an IL obeys implicational universals…
![Page 30: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
MDH and IL• IL obeys implicational universals.• That is, we know that IL is a language.• So, we know that languages are such that
having word-final voiceless obstruents implies that you also have word-final sonorant consonants, among other things.
• What would happen if we taught Japanese L2 learners of English only—and at the outset—voiced obstruents?
![Page 31: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Generalizing with markedness scales
• Voiced obstruents most marked Surge• Voiceless obstruents Coke• Sonorant consonants Mountain• Vowels least marked Coffee
• Japanese learner of English will have an easier time at each step learning voiceless obstruents and then voiced obstruents.
• But—if taught voiced obstruents immediately, the fact that the IL obeys implicational (markedness) universals means that voiceless obstruents “come for free.”
![Page 32: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Nifty!• Does it work? Does it help?• Answers seem to be:
– Yes, it seems to at least sort of work.– Maybe it helps.
• Point is: Learning a marked structure is harder. So, if you learn a marked structure, you can automatically generalize to the less marked structures, but was it faster than learning the easier steps in succession would have been?
![Page 33: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Change between pre- & post-testEckman, Bell, and Nelson (1988)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Subj Obj O.P.
Subj GroupObj GroupO.P. GroupControls
![Page 34: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy
• Keenan & Comrie (1977) observed a hierarchy among the kinds of relative clauses that languages allow.
• The astronaut [(that) I met yesterday].• Head noun: astronaut
• Modifying clause:(that/who) I met — yesterday.
• Compare: I met the astronaut yesterday.• This is an object relative because the place where the head
noun would be in the simple sentence version is th object.
![Page 35: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy
• There are several kinds of relative clauses, based on where the head noun “comes from” in the modifying clause:
• The astronaut…– [I met — yesterday] object– [who — met me yesterday] subject– [I gave a book to —] indirect object– [I was talking about —] obj. of P– [whose house I like —] Genitive (possessor)– [I am braver than —] obj. of comparative
![Page 36: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy
• Turns out: Languages differ in what positions they allow relative clauses to be formed on.
• English allows all the positions mentioned to be used to make relative clauses.
• Arabic allows relative clauses to be formed only with subjects.
• Greek allows relative clauses to be formed only with subjects or objects.
![Page 37: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Resumptive pronouns• The guy who they don’t know whether he wants to
come.• A student who I can’t make any sense out of the papers
he writes.• The actress who Tom wondered whether her father was
rich.
• In cases where relative clause formation is not allowed, it can sometimes be salvaged by means of a pronoun in the position that the head noun is to be associated with.
![Page 38: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
NPAH and resumptive pronouns• Generally speaking, it turns out that in languages which
do not allow relative clauses to be formed off a certain position, they will instead allow relative clauses with a resumptive pronoun in that position.
• Arabic: allows only subject relative clauses. But for all other positions allows a resumptive pronoun construction, analogous to:– The book that John bought it.– The tree that John is standing by it.– The astronaut that John gave him a present.
![Page 39: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
NPAH
• The positions off which you can relativize appears to be an implicational hierarchy.
Language SUB DO IO OP GEN OCOMP
Arabic – + + + + +
Greek – – +? +? + +
Japanese – – – – +/ –
Persian – (+) + + + +
![Page 40: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
NPAH in L2A
• Very widely studied implicational universal in L2A—many people have addressed the question of whether the IL obeys the NPAH and whether teaching aa marked structure can help.
• Eckman et al. (1989) was about this second question…
![Page 41: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Change between pre- & post-testEckman, Bell, and Nelson (1988)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Subj Obj O.P.
Subj GroupObj GroupO.P. GroupControls
![Page 42: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Next week• Anna Do, graduate student in the Applied
Linguistics program here at BU, has looked at this question focusing on English speakers learning Korean, trying to determine (a) whether the learners’ IL obey the NPAH, and (b) to what extent there is transfer of the position of the L1 on the NPAH to the IL (where the TL is at a different position).
• Next week, she’ll be here to tell us about her experiment and her results.
![Page 43: Accessibility hierarchy boston university (2) - lx400-7b-lguniv-1](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042715/55a27cb41a28ab772a8b45c2/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)