academic writing
DESCRIPTION
Academic Writing. What distinguishes Good Writing from Bad Writing ? Let’s Read from Robert Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance . Academic Writing. “Quality” - Pirsig (as Phaedrus) later becomes obsessed with this concept to the point of mental instability. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Aristotelian Logic & Fashioning an Argument
A Study of Deductive Reasoning
![Page 2: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is Argumentation? Argumentation is a process of
reasoning that asserts the soundness of a debatable position, belief, or conclusion.
Can be used to: Convince other people to accept or
acknowledge the validiy of your position Defend your position from other points of view Question or refute a position you believe to be
misguided, untrue, dangerous, evil, or absurd.
![Page 3: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Persuasion vs. Argumentation
Persuasion is a more general term that refers to how a writer influences an audience to adopt a belief or follow a course of action. Pathos, Logos, Ethos…
Argumentation is the appeal to reason…It is more concerned with demonstrating that certain ideas are valid and others are not.
![Page 4: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Planning your Essay Topic: ideally, you
should have an intellectual and emotional stake in your topic!
You should keep an open-mind in the research phase. You must be willing to see all sides of the issue.
Purpose: What you expect your argument to accomplish and how you wish your audience to respond.
Thesis: Must take a stand….Must be debatable…AKA Must have a reasonable ANTITHESIS
![Page 5: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
EVIDENCE1. Facts…2. Opinions…
Interpretations of facts
NOT ALL OPINIONS ARE CREATED EQUAL!
Criteria for evidence1. Relevant…make sure
it’s pertinent to your argument!
2. Representative and typical…Basically, you should avoid cherry-picking evidence and opinions to make your argument look stronger than it is.
3. Sufficient…it needs to be enough!
![Page 6: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Refutation When planning
your essay, you should write down all the arguments against your thesis.
Your essay must deal with your opposition’s argument…It must either..
Show they are unsound, unfair, or weak.
If it’s super strong, concede it’s strength…perhaps point out some weaknesses…then move back to showing why your point of view is strong.
![Page 7: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Why learn this stuff? Logic = Reasoning Basis of academic
thought Creation of argument
![Page 8: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
How do I demonstrate logic? Make obvious, explicit
connections between your major thoughts and ideas
You want someone to FOLLOW your train of thought.
![Page 9: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Aristotle Worked with syllogisms
Formal system of thoughtProvides a method for connecting ideas together
![Page 10: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Syllogism Ex: 1) Wood floats
in water.2) Ships are
made of wood3) Therefore
ships float in water.
![Page 11: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Syllogisms #1 and #2 are both a
premise.
#3 is a conclusion
![Page 12: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Syllogism Example Reiterated
Premise #1: Wood floats in water.
Premise #2: Ships are made of wood.
Conclusion: Therefore, ships float in water.
![Page 13: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Syllogism Practice If all humans are mortal, and all Greeks are humans,
then all Greeks are mortal.
![Page 14: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
This type of logic isn’t perfect!
All chickens have two legs. Aristotle has two legs. Therefore, Aristotle is a
chicken.=flawed
However, this isn’t the point!
![Page 15: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
So? When you write an
essay, watch your premises. They should lead to a valid conclusion.
![Page 16: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Examples – Fill in the missing
component All trees have
root systems.
Therefore, All trees need nitrogen.
All root systems need nitrogen.
![Page 17: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Examples – Fill in the missing
component
All fruits grow on trees
Therefore, all oranges grow on trees
All oranges are fruits
![Page 18: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Examples – Fill in the missing
component All bachelor's
are single
Johnny is single, Hence, Johnny is
a bachelor
![Page 19: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Ex: Logic w/o syllogism format
Everyday I go to work. This journey from my home to my office takes one hour. My office starts at eight o' clock in the morning. So, if I leave my home at seven o' clock in the morning, I will reach the office in time.
![Page 20: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Argument
Validity and Soundness
![Page 21: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Argument: Validity A deductive argument is said
to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. Otherwise, a deductive argument is said to be invalid.
![Page 22: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Argument: Validity Valid arguments do not require true premises.
![Page 23: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Ex: Valid Argument – True premises
Either Elizabeth owns a Honda or she owns a Saturn.
Elizabeth does not own a Honda.
Therefore, Elizabeth owns a Saturn.
![Page 24: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Ex: Valid Argument – False premises
All toasters are items made of gold.
All items made of gold are time-travel devices.
Therefore, all toasters are time-travel devices.
![Page 25: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Argument - Soundness A sound argument is one that
is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true
![Page 26: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Soundness A deductive argument is
sound if and only if 1) it is both valid, and 2) all of its premises are actually true.
Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound.
![Page 27: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Ex: Sound argument No felons are eligible voters.
Some professional athletes are felons.
Therefore, some professional athletes are not eligible voters.
QUANTIFIER
S
![Page 28: Academic Writing](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/568162ac550346895dd3305f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Practice…