academic academic excellence excellence · 3/9/2017 · academic excellence 3 competency breakdown...
TRANSCRIPT
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
1
ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE
2016-17 Monitoring ReportMarch 9, 2017
Toni PaceAssistant Superintendent of K12 Support
Marie VerhaarAssistant Superintendent of Teaching & Learning
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
2
Goal 1: Academic
Excellence
All students will perform at or
above grade level and we will
eliminate disparities among all
groups.
Strategic plan: measuring the whole child
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Competency breakdown by subgroup can be found on the strategic plan website3
Competency2017
T1
2016
T171%
Compare and contrast stories on their approaches to similar themes and topics
6.9% 2.9% In Progress
Determine a theme of a story from details in the text to summarize
8.6% 6.1% In Progress
Determine the meaning of general academic and domain-specific words and phrases in a grade level text
20.6 20.6% In Progress
Determine two or more ideas of informational text/explain how they are support by key details to summarize
7.1% 7.6% In Progress
The percentage of
students scoring at
each level on the
grade level specific
elementary reading
competencies.
Benchmark: Reading Competencies District Goal
by 2018
Students scored at
or above standardReport Card: 5th Grade
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
4
Competency2017
T1
2016
T171%
Integrate information from several text on the same topic in order to write/speak about the subject
4.2% 4.8% In Progress
Know and apply grade-level phonics and word analysis skills in decoding words
40.5% 35.2% In Progress
Participate in collaborative conversations with diverse partners about grade 5 topics and text with peers and adults in small and larger groups
28.4% 23.3% In Progress
Quote the text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences
13.0% 12.5% In Progress
The percentage of
students scoring at
each level on the
grade level specific
elementary reading
competencies.
Report Card: 5th Grade
Benchmark: Reading Competencies District Goal
by 2018
Students scored at
or above standard
Competency breakdown by subgroup can be found on the strategic plan website
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
5
Competency2017
T1
2016
T171%
Read and comprehend literature and informational text at the high end of the grades 4-5 text complexity band
27.9% 30.0% In Progress
Read with sufficient accuracy and fluency to support comprehension
37.6% 38.6% In Progress
The percentage of
students scoring at
each level on the
grade level specific
elementary reading
competencies.
Competency breakdown by subgroup can be found on the strategic plan website
Report Card: 5th Grade
Benchmark: Reading Competencies District Goal
by 2018
Students scored at
or above standard
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
6
Competency2017
T1
2016
T166%
Add and subtract fractions with unlike denominators 34.6% 36.3% In Progress
Add and subtracts multi-digit whole numbers and decimals to the hundredth place
37.2% 37.0% In Progress
Analyze patterns and relationships within data sets 0.4% 0.6% In Progress
Classifies two-dimensional figures in a hierarchy based on properties
0.0% 0.9% In Progress
Converts like measurement units within a givenmeasurement unit
1.8% 0.5% In Progress
The percentage of
students scoring at
each level on the
grade level specific
elementary math
competencies.
Competency breakdown by subgroup can be found on the strategic plan website
Report Card: 5th Grade
Benchmark: Math Competencies District Goal
by 2018
Students scored at
or above standard
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
7
Competency2017
T1
2016
T166%
Converts like measurement units within a given measurement system
1.8% 0.9% In Progress
Divides multi-digit whole numbers and decimals to the hundredth place
1.7% 1.4% In Progress
Divides unit fractions by whole numbers and whole numbers by unit fractions
1.5% 2.0% In Progress
Evaluates expressions with parentheses, brackets, or braces
3.5% 1.6% In Progress
Finds the volume of a rectangular prism 0.3% 0.4% In Progress
Graphs points on the coordinate plane for two sets of data
1.2% 1.0% In Progress
The percentage of
students scoring at
each level on the
grade level specific
elementary math
competencies.
Competency breakdown by subgroup can be found on the strategic plan website
Report Card: 5th Grade
Benchmark: Math Competencies District Goal
by 2018
Students scored at
or above standard
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
8
Competency2017
T1
2016
T166%
Multiplies fractions by fractions and whole numbers 5.3% 3.5% In Progress
Multiplies multi-digit whole numbers and decimals to the hundredth place
4.0% 2.3% In Progress
Solves real world problems involving additional, subtraction, multiplication, or division with fractions or mixed numbers
6.8% 9.7% In Progress
Writes algebraic expressions that represents simple situations
2.1% 9.9% In Progress
The percentage of
students scoring at
each level on the
grade level specific
elementary math
competencies.
Competency breakdown by subgroup can be found on the strategic plan website
Report Card: 5th Grade
Benchmark: Math Competencies District Goal
by 2018
Students scored at
or above standard
Academic
Excellence
Academic
ExcellenceBenchmark: 5th Grade Competencies
Key Findings
The low percentages for Trimester 1 (T1) competencies are typically a result
of many competencies not yet introduced or evaluated
Percentages are not significantly different for students meeting end of year
ELA and Math standards when analyzing T1 2016 and T1 2017
Students in 2017 demonstrate higher proficiency when comparing and
contrasting stories
5th graders in 2017 are slightly less proficient when solving real world
problems involving addition/subtraction/multiplication/division and writing
algebraic expressions
Continuing to progress towards the end of year district goal of 66% (math)
and 71% (ELA) for 5th grade competencies with significant work still to do
9
The percentage of
students scoring at
each level on the
grade level specific
elementary math
and reading
competencies.
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Next Steps (as reported 9/22/16)
Align K-12 ELA standards to identify priorities and supporting standards
Administer i-Ready (reading & math) and DRA (reading) to make
informed decisions about instruction and differentiate support for
students (completed 2 of 3 assessments)
Shift ELA instruction to a workshop model using whole group, small
group, and one-on-one instruction to address standards and provide
students with support in response to their strengths and challenges
(Ongoing)
Work with principals and instructional coaches throughout the year
digging deeper into the ELA Framework
10
Benchmark: 5th Grade Competencies
The percentage of
students scoring at
each level on the
grade level specific
elementary math
and reading
competencies.
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Next Steps (as reported 9/22/16)
Provide PD for teachers during the year to support the benchmarks and
align practice to standards-based instruction and assessment
Provide an online resource directly related to grade level competencies
for parents with suggestions to support their students at home in
partnership with the classroom teacher
Support student learning in numeracy skills by placing an emphasis on
computational fluency and applying these skills in real world problem
solving
Continue to develop a systematic and effective intervention framework
Continue to utilize data days as a way to identify school specific next
steps based on assessment
11
Benchmark: 5th Grade Competencies
The percentage of
students scoring at
each level on the
grade level specific
elementary math
and reading
competencies.
Academic
Excellence
Academic
ExcellenceBenchmark: Algebra and Geometry
12 Breakdown of this data can be found on the strategic plan website
The percentage of
students earning a
‘C’ or better in
Algebra or
Geometry
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
13
Benchmark: Algebra and Geometry
Breakdown of this data can be found on the strategic plan website
District Total Student
Demographic (OSPI)
October 2015
White 12,063 41.2%
Black 5,256 17.9%
Hispanic/
Latino5,704 19.5%
Asian 2,843 9.7%
Multi 2,332 8.0%
Pacific Is. 764 2.6%
A. Indian/
AK Native350 1.2%
Male 14,892 50.8%
Female 14,421 49.2%
Spec. Ed. 4,114 14.1%
ELL 2,836 9.7%
FRL 17,645 60.6%
Sub Group2016
S1
2016
Total
2017
S1
2017
Total
White 75.2% 818 77.7% 796
Asian 83.2% 244 87.8% 188
Black 64.0% 353 58.7% 310
Native
American75.0% 32 57.7% 26
Multi 66.7% 84 64.8% 88
Hispanic 63.9% 341 62.4% 327
Pacific Islander 61.0% 59 56.6% 53
Report Card: 8th Grade Earning ‘C’ or BetterDistrict Goal = 76%
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
14
Benchmark: Algebra and Geometry
Breakdown of this data can be found on the strategic plan website
District Total Student
Demographic (OSPI)
October 2015
White 12,063 41.2%
Black 5,256 17.9%
Hispanic/
Latino5,704 19.5%
Asian 2,843 9.7%
Multi 2,332 8.0%
Pacific Is. 764 2.6%
A. Indian/
AK Native350 1.2%
Male 14,892 50.8%
Female 14,421 49.2%
Spec. Ed. 4,114 14.1%
ELL 2,836 9.7%
FRL 17,645 60.6%
Sub Group2016
S1
2016
Total
2017
S1
2017
Total
Male 66.3% 960 67.4% 868
Female 76.4% 971 74.5% 877
Special Education 47.6% 105 40.5% 128
Non-Special Ed 72.7% 1826 73.3% 1617
ELL 57.5% 113 47.2% 106
Non-ELL 72.2% 1818 72.5% 1639
FRL 64.5% 1136 61.8% 976
Non-FRL 81.3% 803 82.6% 772
Report Card: 8th Grade Earning ‘C’ or BetterDistrict Goal = 76%
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Key Findings
• The percentage of students earning a ‘C’ or better in
algebra/geometry plateaued with a slight decreased in
semester 1 of 2017 (-1.0%), but we’ve maintained a positive
increase from 2015
• All subgroups, with the exception of Asian, White, and Male,
decreased in semester 1 of 2017
• This data shows the limitations of comparing classes of
students as oppose to cohorts.
15
Report Card: 8th Grade
Benchmark: Algebra or Geometry
The percentage of
students earning a
‘C’ or better in
Algebra or
Geometry
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Next Steps (as reported 9/22/16)
Administer i-Ready math assessment to all middle school students
(completed 2 of 3 assessments)
Invite middle school math teachers to meet monthly to analyze
Smarter Balance and i-Ready data and plan instruction based on
assessment data
Provide professional development for teachers, administrators, and
instructional coaches to refine their knowledge about what students
need to know, understand, and be able to do to meet grade level
content and mathematical practice standards
16
Report Card: 8th Grade
Benchmark: Algebra or Geometry
The percentage of
students earning a
‘C’ or better in
Algebra or
Geometry
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Next Steps (as reported 9/22/16)
Increase co-teaching training to enable more general education and
special education staff to attend; meeting individual schools to goal
set and plan ways to expand the co-teaching model
Support to building level Math PLCs with alignment of instructional
resources, standards, and assessment utilizing the Smarter
Balanced Achievement Level Descriptors (ALDs).
Continue to differentiate classroom instruction to meet the needs of
all students
17
Report Card: 8th Grade
Benchmark: Algebra or Geometry
The percentage of
students earning a
‘C’ or better in
Algebra or
Geometry
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
18
Benchmark: English Language Arts
Breakdown of this data can be found on the strategic plan website
The percentage of
students earning a
‘C’ or better in
English Language
Arts
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
19
Benchmark: English Language Arts
Breakdown of this data can be found on the strategic plan website
District Total Student
Demographic (OSPI)
October 2015
White 12,063 41.2%
Black 5,256 17.9%
Hispanic/
Latino5,704 19.5%
Asian 2,843 9.7%
Multi 2,332 8.0%
Pacific Is. 764 2.6%
A. Indian/
AK Native350 1.2%
Male 14,892 50.8%
Female 14,421 49.2%
Spec. Ed. 4,114 14.1%
ELL 2,836 9.7%
FRL 17,645 60.6%
Sub Group2016
S1
2016
Total
2017
S1
2017
Total
White 80.7% 711 77.8% 728
Asian 87.5% 184 85.7% 149
Black 73.5% 309 71.5% 275
Native
American68.0% 25 72.7% 22
Multi 82.6% 69 70.7% 76
Hispanic 68.4% 250 72.3% 265
Pacific Islander 59.0% 39 77.5% 41
Report Card: 8th Grade Earning ‘C’ or BetterDistrict Goal = 78%
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
20 Breakdown of this data can be found on the strategic plan website
Benchmark: English Language ArtsDistrict Total Student
Demographic (OSPI)
October 2015
White 12,063 41.2%
Black 5,256 17.9%
Hispanic/
Latino5,704 19.5%
Asian 2,843 9.7%
Multi 2,332 8.0%
Pacific Is. 764 2.6%
A. Indian/
AK Native350 1.2%
Male 14,892 50.8%
Female 14,421 49.2%
Spec. Ed. 4,114 14.1%
ELL 2,836 9.7%
FRL 17,645 60.6%
Sub Group2016
S1
2016
Total
2017
S1
2017
Total
Male 72.0% 804 70.1% 761
Female 83.1% 783 81.9% 795
Special Education 67.1% 143 67.4% 183
Non-Special Ed 78.5% 1444 77.2% 1372
ELL 70.1% 77 66.7% 87
Non-ELL 77.9% 1510 76.6% 1468
FRL 70.7% 882 68.4% 845
Non-FRL 86.1% 710 85.2% 711
Report Card: 8th Grade Earning ‘C’ or BetterDistrict Goal = 78%
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Key Findings
• At the mid-point in the school year we are just shy of our district goal of 78%
• The percentage of students earning a ‘C’ or better in ELA plateaued with a
slight decreased in semester 1 of 2017 (-1.5%), but we’ve maintained a
positive increase from 2015
• Our special education subgroup shows an increase in the number of
students as well as an increase percentage from 2016 to 2017
• All subgroups, with the exception of Hispanic, Native American, Pacific
Islander, and Special Education, decreased in semester 1 of 2017
• This data shows the limitations of comparing classes of students as oppose
to cohorts.
21
Report Card: 8th Grade
Benchmark: English Language Arts
The percentage of
students earning a
‘C’ or better in
English Language
Arts
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Next Steps (as reported 9/22/16)
• Administer i-Ready ELA assessment to all middle school
students (completed 2 of 3 assessments)
• Alignment K-12 ELA standards to identify priorities and
supporting standards
• On-going studios and learning walks in each building for the
purpose of collaborative discourse
22
Report Card: 8th Grade
Benchmark: English Language Arts
The percentage of
students earning a
‘C’ or better in
English Language
Arts
Academic
Excellence
Academic
Excellence
Next Steps (as reported 9/22/16)
• Middle school (and HS) ELA teachers meet 5 times per year
to support a common understanding of the SpringBoard best
practices and resources, rubric development and scoring
protocols for common assessments
• Continue to align SpringBoard curriculum in middle school
and high school with a focus on collaborative lesson planning
and pacing
• Continue to differentiate classroom instruction to meet the
needs of all students
23
Report Card: 8th Grade
Benchmark: English Language Arts
The percentage of
students earning a
‘C’ or better in
English Language
Arts