abstract a hydrologic study of four headwater watersheds is being conducted in an undisturbed forest...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
Abstract
A hydrologic study of four headwater watersheds is being conducted in an undisturbed forest near Juruena, Mato Grosso in the seasonally dry, southern Amazon. The micro-watersheds range in size from 0.6 to 1.7 ha. Soils in two of the watersheds contain a sharp increase in clay content with depth in the upper 50 cm, corresponding to a sharp decrease in hydraulic conductivity. Stream water samples were collected biweekly for the four headwater streams during the 2003 wet to dry season transition and throughout the dry season. Decreasing stream flows during this period corresponded with increases in stream water concentrations of calcium, magnesium, silica, sodium, sulfate, electrical conductivity, and alkalinity. Chloride concentrations decreased during this period, with no discernible relationship determined for pH, nitrate and potassium. While there is variation among the watersheds, the elemental concentration trends with respect to decreasing stream flow were consistent for each of the four watersheds. During the period reported here, the groundwater contribution to stream flow increased from being the predominant source during the wet to dry transition, to being the exclusive source during the dry season. Decreases in the mineral weathering index [Na/(Na + Ca)] corresponded with decreases in stream flow for each of the four watersheds throughout the 2003 low-flow period. This indicates that mineral weathering is the primary source of cations exported from these forested headwater watersheds, in contrast with results obtained in a study of a mixed-land use and larger-order Amazonian watershed (Markewitz et al., 2002).
Low-flow headwater stream nutrient concentrations controlled by weathering in four forested Amazonian watersheds
Mark Johnson (1)*, Johannes Lehmann (1), Eduardo Guimarães Couto (2), Susan Riha (1), Evandro Selva (2), João Paulo Novaes Filho (2), Luiz Carlos Mattos Rodrigues (2), Michely Tomazi (2), Erick Fernandes (1)
(1)Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, USA, (2) Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Brazil*Email address: [email protected]
ND11
Watershed Study Design and Methods
In each watershed, stream discharge is monitored continuously at a V-notch weir instrumented with a pressure transducer and data logger, and water table depths are monitored continuously in two 6-m deep piezometers. A suite of tipping buckets have been installed in each watershed to measure timings of throughfall, overland flow, and percolating water in each watershed. Conductivity and pH are measured in the field at the time of water sample collection. DOC is determined chromatographically after combustion following filtration with GF/F glass fiber filters (0.7 m). Samples are preserved (HgCl for DOC; H2SO4 or HNO3 for inorganics) and stored at 3°C until analysis. Cl- was determined titrimetrically (Mohr), Ca2+
using atomic absorption, K+ and Na+ with a flame photometer, and SO42- was analyzed colorimetrically.
Zero-tension tipping bucket
lysimeter
Surface-runoff collector
Surface-runoff tipping bucket
V-Notch Weir and POC trap (> 2mm)
Schematic of Watershed 4 illustrating water flux measurements and collection locations common to the four basins. Tipping buckets and pressure transducers are used for measuring timings and fluxes.
TF- Throughfall SRO- Surface runoffLysimeter (10 cm)P- Piezometer nests (50 cm and 6 m)V- V-Notch Weir
265
26
4
263
26
6
26
2
261260
259
25
8
257
25
6
267
26
5
256
266
P
P PP
PSRO
TF L
L
V
Soil pit containing lysimeters
N0 50 100 Meters
Headwater catchments1
2
3
4
Streams
0.85 Ha1.69 Ha0.78 Ha0.62 Ha IKONOS Panchromatic Image
(Courtesy EOS-Webster)
Headwater watersheds
Results
Stream water parameters during wet-to-dry season transition and dry season, 2003
Date30-04 15-05 30-05 14-06 29-06 14-07 29-07 13-08 28-08 12-09 27-09 12-10
Co
nd
uct
ivity
( S
cm
-1)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Watershed 1Watershed 2Watershed 3Watershed 4
Date30-04 15-05 30-05 14-06 29-06 14-07 29-07 13-08 28-08 12-09 27-09 12-10
pH
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.8
7.0
Date15-04 30-04 15-05 30-05 14-06 29-06 14-07 29-07 13-08 28-08 12-09 27-09 12-10
Na
+ ( e
quiv
L-1
)
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Date15-04 30-04 15-05 30-05 14-06 29-06 14-07 29-07 13-08 28-08 12-09 27-09 12-10
Cl-
(e
quiv
L-1
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Date15-04 30-04 15-05 30-05 14-06 29-06 14-07 29-07 13-08 28-08 12-09 27-09 12-10
Ca
2+
( e
quiv
. L
-1)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Date15-04 30-04 15-05 30-05 14-06 29-06 14-07 29-07 13-08 28-08 12-09 27-09 12-10
[Na
/ (
Na
+ C
a)]
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Date15-04 30-04 15-05 30-05 14-06 29-06 14-07 29-07 13-08 28-08 12-09 27-09 12-10
SO
42
- (
equ
iv L
-1)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Date15-04 30-04 15-05 30-05 14-06 29-06 14-07 29-07 13-08 28-08 12-09 27-09 12-10 T
ota
l Alk
alin
ity ( e
quiv
L-1
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Watershed 1Watershed 2Watershed 3Watershed 4
Watershed 1Watershed 2Watershed 3Watershed 4
Watershed 1Watershed 2Watershed 3Watershed 4
AlkalinitypH Chloride
SulfateWeathering IndexSodiumCalcium
Conductivity
References:Markewitz, D., Davidson, E.A., Figueiredo, R.D.O., Victoria, R.L. and Krusche, A.V., 2001. Control of cation concentrations in stream waters by surface soil processes in an Amazonian watershed. Nature, 410(6830): 802-805.
Watershed 1 Stream flow
Date01/07 01/08 01/09 01/10
Dis
char
ge
(lit
ers
per
sec
on
d)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Rain
fall (mm
day
-1)
05101520253035
Water table depth (B3P2 piezometer)
Date01/08 01/09 01/10
Rain
fall (mm
day
-1)
051015202530
Wat
er t
able
dep
th (
cm)
260
280
300
320
340
360
Diurnal water table fluctuations
Date01/08 03/08 05/08 07/08 09/08
Wat
er t
able
dep
th (
cm)
280
282
284
286
288
290
Average pH, DOC and Ca2+, May 2003
DOC (mg/L)Watershed Stream water Spring water
1 0.36 0.262 0.82 0.293 0.31 0.024 0.25 0.06
pH Watershed Stream water Spring water
1 5.6 5.32 6.4 5.03 6.5 5.14 6.2 5.0
Ca2+ (µequiv. L-1)Watershed Stream water Spring water
1 89.82 21.612 149.70 34.933 99.80 36.434 94.81 59.88
Differences between water quality of stream water and corresponding groundwater seeps (spring water) during base flow periods indicates in-stream DOC generation is likely occurring.