about partisan sharing at cosn 2014

64
Partisan Sharing: Facebook Evidence and Societal Consequences Jisun An Social ComputingTeam, Qatar Computing Research Institute (QCRI) with Daniele Quercia (Yahoo Labs Barcelona), Jon Crowcroft (Univ. of Cambridge) COSN 2014

Upload: jisun-an

Post on 02-Dec-2014

143 views

Category:

Data & Analytics


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Slides of my talk at COSN 2014 Title: Partisan Sharing: Facebook Evidence and Societal Consequences PDF: http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7254

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Partisan  Sharing:    Facebook  Evidence  and  Societal  Consequences  

 

Jisun  An  Social  Computing  Team,  Qatar  Computing  Research  Institute  (QCRI)  

 with  Daniele  Quercia  (Yahoo  Labs  Barcelona),  Jon  Crowcroft  (Univ.  of  Cambridge)  

COSN  2014  

Page 2: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014
Page 3: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Which  one  would  you  choose  to  read  in  the  waiting  room?    

Page 4: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Neutral   Liberal  Conservative  

Republicans/conservatives  spend  more  time  with  National  Review;    Democrats/liberals  spend  more  time  with  The  Nation.  

Page 5: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

   The  theory  of  selective  exposure  holds  that  people  tend  to  seek  out  political  information  confirming  their  beliefs  and  avoid  challenging  information.    

Page 6: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014
Page 7: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

SELECTIVE  EXPOSURE:  EXIST  OR  NOT?  

It  exists:  people  tend  to  preferentially  choose,  read,  and  enjoy  partisan  news.            Measure  what  people  select  to  read  through  survey  &  experiment  on  newspaper,  magazine,    TV/radio  programs.  

Page 8: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

SELECTIVE  EXPOSURE:  EXIST  OR  NOT?  

It  exists:  people  tend  to  preferentially  choose,  read,  and  enjoy  partisan  news.            Measure  what  people  select  to  read  through  survey  &  experiment  on  newspaper,  magazine,    TV/radio  programs.  

It  does  not  exists:  no  evidence  for  selective  exposure  in  their  news  diet.            Measure  actual  exposure  through  web  log  &  recording  &  Twitter  on  TV/radio  programs  and  online  news.  

Page 9: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

What  happens  after  exposure?    

Page 10: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

How  do  people  react    to  such  exposure?    

Page 11: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Sharing  is  one  indication  that  reveals  what  people  act  on  after  the  exposure.    

Page 12: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Sharing  captures  how  people  perceive  news  information  in  an  unobtrusive  way.    

Page 13: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

   Partisan  sharing:  people  tend  to  share  like-­‐minded  political  information  and  avoid  challenging  ones.    

Page 14: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

OUR  GOAL      By  looking  at  news  sharing  in  social  media,  we  aim  to  examine  whether  partisan  sharing  exists  or  not.  

Page 15: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

HYPOTHESIS  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Page 16: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

HYPOTHESIS  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Page 17: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

HYPOTHESIS  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Page 18: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

HYPOTHESIS  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Page 19: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014
Page 20: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

NEWS  SHARING  IN  FACEBOOK  

Subset  of  myPersonality  users  228,064  US  based  Facebook  users  (4.9M  URLs)  

Page 21: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

NEWS  SHARING  IN  FACEBOOK  

Subset  of  myPersonality  users  228,064  US  based  Facebook  users  (4.9M  URLs)  

Page 22: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

MEASURING  PARTISAN  SHARING    We  measure  how  balance  a  user’s  news  sharing  is.      

         Net  Partisan  skew  reflects  par?sanship  and  is  based  

on  which  news  ar?cle  a  user  shares  on  the  poli?cal  leanings  (liberal  &  conserva?ve)  of  those  news  ar?cles  

Page 23: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

MEASURING  PARTISAN  SHARING    We  measure  how  balance  a  user’s  news  sharing  is.  

Net  par(san  skew:      

         Net  Partisan  skew  reflects  par?sanship  and  is  based  

on  which  news  ar?cle  a  user  shares  on  the  poli?cal  leanings  (liberal  &  conserva?ve)  of  those  news  ar?cles  

It is ±2 if, for every 7.4 (≈ e2) conservative (liberal) articles, the user shares 1 liberal (conservative) article  

ln(#conservative news) - ln(#liberal news)  

+  0  

Share  only  liberal    news  aritlces  

Share  only    conserva(ve    news  ar(cles  

-­‐  

Share  ar(cles    equally  on    

both    poli(cal  leaning  

Page 24: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

METHODOLOGY  

1.  Facebook  news  consumption  From  a  list  of  100  news  papers  in  USA  61,977  news  articles  posted  by  12,495  users    News  articles  comes  from  37  news  sites  

       

Page 25: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

METHODOLOGY  

1.  Facebook  news  consumption  From  a  list  of  100  news  papers  in  USA  61,977  news  articles  posted  by  12,495  users    News  articles  comes  from  37  news  sites  

 

2.  Determining  media  slant  Classify  news  outlets  into  liberal,  conservative,  or  center  http://mondotimes.com  &  Shapiro’s  classification  

     

Page 26: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

METHODOLOGY  

1.  Facebook  news  consumption  From  a  list  of  100  news  papers  in  USA  61,977  news  articles  posted  by  12,495  users    News  articles  comes  from  37  news  sites  

 

2.  Determining  media  slant  Classify  news  outlets  into  liberal,  conservative,  or  center  http://mondotimes.com  &  Shapiro’s  classification  

     

Page 27: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

METHODOLOGY  

1.  Facebook  news  consumption  From  a  list  of  100  news  papers  in  USA  61,977  news  articles  posted  by  12,495  users    News  articles  comes  from  37  news  sites  

 

2.  Determining  media  slant  Classify  news  outlets  into  liberal,  conservative,  or  center  http://mondotimes.com  &  Shapiro’s  classification  

 

3.  Only  news  articles  about  politics  Topic  classification  using  Alchemy  API  12  topics:  Arts  Entertainment,  Business,  Computer  Internet,  Culture  Politics,    Gaming,  Health,  Law  Crime,  Recreation,  Religion,  Science  Technology,  Sports,  Weather  

37%  of  news  articles  (22,929)  are  classified:  42%  in  Culture  Politics    

Page 28: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

METHODOLOGY  

1.  Facebook  news  consumption  From  a  list  of  100  news  papers  in  USA  61,977  news  articles  posted  by  12,495  users    News  articles  comes  from  37  news  sites  

 

2.  Determining  media  slant  Classify  news  outlets  into  liberal,  conservative,  or  center  http://mondotimes.com  &  Shapiro’s  classification  

 

3.  Only  news  articles  about  politics  Topic  classification  using  Alchemy  API  12  topics:  Arts  Entertainment,  Business,  Computer  Internet,  Culture  Politics,    Gaming,  Health,  Law  Crime,  Recreation,  Religion,  Science  Technology,  Sports,  Weather  

37%  of  news  articles  (22,929)  are  classified:  42%  in  Culture  Politics    

4.  Measuring  partisanship:  Net  partisan  skew  ln(#conservative news) - ln(#liberal news)  

Page 29: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

NEWS  SHARING  IN  TWITTER  

Build  a  VotingTime  to  recruit  Twitter  users  71  UK  based  Twitter  users  (1K  political  news  articles)  

Page 30: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

METHODOLOGY  

1.  Twitter  news  consumption  From  a  list  of  100  news  papers  in  USA  5,714  news  articles  posted  by  71  users    News  articles  comes  from  10  news  sites  

 

2.  Determining  media  slant  Classify  news  outlets  into  liberal,  conservative,  or  center  Manual  coding  by  three  UK  political  journalists  (kappa  =  0.92)  

 

3.  Only  news  articles  about  politics  Topic  classification  using  Alchemy  API  12  topics:  Arts  Entertainment,  Business,  Computer  Internet,  Culture  Politics,    Gaming,  Health,  Law  Crime,  Recreation,  Religion,  Science  Technology,  Sports,  Weather  

17.6%  in  Culture  Politics    

4.  Measuring  partisanship:  Net  partisan  skew  ln(#conservative news) - ln(#liberal news)  

Page 31: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Does  selective  tendency  exist    in  political  news  sharing?    

Page 32: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

PARTISAN  SHARING  (POLITICS)  

0.0

0.2

0.4

-4 -2 0 2

Density

4+ posts 8+ posts

Political News Sharing

Page 33: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

PARTISAN  SHARING  (POLITICS)  

0.0

0.2

0.4

-4 -2 0 2

Density

4+ posts 8+ posts

Political News Sharing

Sharing    Liberal    news  

Sharing    conservative    

news  

Page 34: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

-2 0 2

Density

Liberal (n=149) Conservative (n=84)

Political News Sharing

0.0

0.2

0.4

-4 -2 0 2

Density

4+ posts 8+ posts

Political News Sharing

PARTISAN  SHARING  (POLITICS)  Sharing    Liberal    news  

Sharing    conservative    

news  

YES!    Users  consume  a  considerable  number  of  like-­‐minded  political  news  and  avoid  cross-­‐cutting  news.        

Page 35: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

-2 0 2

Density

Liberal (n=149) Conservative (n=84)

Political News Sharing

PARTISAN  SHARING  (POLITICS)  

YES!    Users  consume  a  considerable  number  of  like-­‐minded  political  news  and  avoid  cross-­‐cutting  news.        

5.5  Liberal    news  

3.7  conservative    

news  

0.0

0.2

0.4

-4 -2 0 2

Density

4+ posts 8+ posts

Political News Sharing

Page 36: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Does  partisan  sharing  influence  consumption  of  other  type  of  news?  

Page 37: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

PARTISAN  SHARING  (ENTERTAINMENT)  

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

-5.0 -2.5 0.0 2.5

Density

4+ posts 8+ posts

Non-political News Sharing

Page 38: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

NO!  When  sharing  entertainment  news,  people  tend  to  select  outlets  regardless  their  political  beliefs.    

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

-4 -2 0 2

Density

Liberal (n=149) Conservative (n=84)

Non-political News Sharing

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

-5.0 -2.5 0.0 2.5

Density

4+ posts 8+ posts

Non-political News Sharing

PARTISAN  SHARING  (ENTERTAINMENT)  

Page 39: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

CHANGES  ACROSS  INDIVIDUALS  Does  par?san  sharing  change  depending  on  users’  characteris?cs?  Does  an  individual  net  par?san  skew  depend  on:     1)  political  leaning     2)  amount  of  news          

         consumption  

Page 40: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

CHANGES  ACROSS  INDIVIDUALS  Does  par?san  sharing  change  depending  on  users’  characteris?cs?  Does  an  individual  net  par?san  skew  depend  on:     1)  political  leaning     2)  amount  of  news          

         consumption  

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Liberal Conservative

Abs

olut

e N

et P

artis

an S

kew

1.82   1.26  

(t(166.54)    =  5.805,    p  <  0.0005  

YES!    Conserva?ves  share  43%  less  like-­‐minded  ar?cles  than  liberals.        

Page 41: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

CHANGES  ACROSS  INDIVIDUALS  Does  par?san  sharing  change  depending  on  users’  characteris?cs?  Does  an  individual  net  par?san  skew  depend  on:     1)  political  leaning     2)  amount  of  news          

         consumption  

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Liberal Conservative

Abs

olut

e N

et P

artis

an S

kew

1.82   1.26  

(t(166.54)    =  5.805,    p  <  0.0005  

0

1

2

3

4

2 3 4ln(# political news)

Abs

olut

e N

et P

artis

an S

kew

r  =  .46    (p  <  0.001)    

YES!    Conserva?ves  share  43%  less  like-­‐minded  ar?cles  than  liberals.  

YES!  As  users  share  more  news,  they  also  share  more  par?san  news.  

Page 42: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

CHANGES  OVER  TIME  

May June

1.2

1.5

1.8

2.1

-2month -1month Election month +1month +2month -2month -1month Election month +1month +2month

Abs

olut

e N

et P

artis

an S

kew

States with primary election in May June

Is  partisan  sharing  more  or  less  prevalent  in  politically  salient  periods  (e.g.,  during  elections)?    

Net  partisanship  skew  is  minimum  in  the  election  month  and  tends  to  increase  to  a  stable  point  outside  that  period    

Page 43: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

VALIDATION  WITH  TWITTER  DATA  

Existence:  Partisan  sharing  exists.    Changes  across  individual    

1.   Political  leaning:  Liberals  tend  to  be  more  partisan  (with  net  skew  of  1.5).    

2.   News  consumption:  Those  who  share  more  are  the  ones  with  stronger  partisanship.  

Page 44: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

SOCIETAL  CONSEQUENCES  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Page 45: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Will  partisan  sharing  lead  to  polarized  political  attitudes?  

Page 46: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

PERCEIVED  BIAS  OF  NEWS  OUTLETS  

Ask  respondents  to  which  extent    they  thought  four  news  outlet    –  BBC  (N),  Telegraph  (C),  Guardian  (L),  The  Sun  (C)  –  were  politically  biased      (‘0’  mean  ‘neutral’  and  ‘100’  means  ‘strongly  biased’)  

Page 47: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

PERCEIVED  BIAS  OF  NEWS  OUTLETS  

 (L)    (N)    (C)    (C)    (L)    (N)    (C)    (C)  

Strongly  Biased  

Liberal  and  conservative  users  significantly  differ  in  their  perceptions  of  the  media’s  leaning  

Page 48: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

POLITICAL  KNOWLEDGE  

Ask  respondent  4  small  political  knowledge  quizzes  about  general  UK  political  facts  

Page 49: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

POLITICAL  KNOWLEDGE  

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

<=2 >2# correct answers

Ave

rage

Net

Par

tisan

Ske

wAsk  respondent  4  small  political  knowledge  quizzes  about  general  UK  political  facts  

Those  politically  knowledgeable  tended  to  be  more  partisan  than  those  less  knowledgeable.  

Page 50: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

POLITICAL  KNOWLEDGE  

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

<=2 >2# correct answers

Ave

rage

Net

Par

tisan

Ske

wAsk  respondent  4  small  political  knowledge  quizzes  about  general  UK  political  facts  

VOTING  PROBABILITY  

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Decided Haven't decidedDecision to vote for next election

Abs

olut

e N

et P

artis

an S

kew

t(4.558)    =  4.566,    p  <  0.01  

Those  politically  knowledgeable  tended  to  be  more  partisan  than  those  less  knowledgeable.  

UK  people  who  have  decided  whether  to  vote  are  more  partisan  than  those  who  remain  undecided  

Page 51: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Partisan  sharing  exists.    Can  we  predict  an  individual  net  

partisan  skew?  

Page 52: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Partisan  sharing  exists.    Can  we  predict  an  individual  net  

partisan  skew?  

-­‐  News  filtering  system  

-­‐  Expose  people  to  diverse  information  

Page 53: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

-­‐  News  filtering  system  

-­‐  Expose  people  to  diverse  information  

-­‐  Knowledgeable  in  politics    

-­‐  Participating  to  political  events  

Partisan  sharing  exists.    Can  we  predict  an  individual  net  

partisan  skew?  

Page 54: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

PREDICTING  AN  INDIVIDUAL  NET  PARTISAN  SKEW  

Three  Facebook  variables:  #  of  Facebook  friends,  #  of  postings,  and  #  of  likes    Three  personal  attributes:  sex,  age,  and  size  of  the  city  she  lives  in    Five  personality  traits  (OCEAN):  openness,  conscientiousness,  extraversion,  agreeableness,  neuroticism  

|Net  partisan  skew|  

Page 55: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

PREDICTING  AN  INDIVIDUAL  NET  PARTISAN  SKEW  

|Net  partisan  skew|  

None  of  them  was  correlated  for  conservatives,  while  only  sex  was  correlated  for  liberals.    Predicting  political  leaning  is  far  easier  than  predicting  partisanship,  which  appears  to  be  quite  challenging.    

Page 56: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

with  perceived  bias  of  news  outlets  BBC  (N),  Telegraph  (C),  Guardian  (L),  The  Sun  (C)  

 Ask  respondents  their  partisanship  

 0  (Labour)  –  25  (liberal)  -­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐  75  (conservative)  –  100  (BNP,  UKIP)    

PREDICTING  AN  INDIVIDUAL  NET  PARTISAN  SKEW  

Page 57: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

with  perceived  bias  of  news  outlets  BBC  (N),  Telegraph  (C),  Guardian  (L),  The  Sun  (C)  

 Ask  respondents  their  partisanship  

 0  (Labour)  –  25  (liberal)  -­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐  75  (conservative)  –  100  (BNP,  UKIP)    

Linear  regression    Coefficients:    The  Guardian  (  biasGuardian  =  0.62)  and    right-­‐leaning  The  Sun  (biasTheSun=  -­‐0.61).    

R2  =  0.44    

PREDICTING  AN  INDIVIDUAL  NET  PARTISAN  SKEW  

Page 58: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

     SUMMARY  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Page 59: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

     SUMMARY  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Par(san  sharing  exist,  but  selec(vity  is  limited  

to  poli(cal  news

Page 60: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

     SUMMARY  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Par(san  sharing  exist,  but  selec(vity  is  limited  

to  poli(cal  news

People  who  are  interested  in  poli(cs  tend  to  have  stronger  

par(sanship

Page 61: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

     SUMMARY  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Par(san  sharing  exist,  but  selec(vity  is  limited  

to  poli(cal  news

People  who  are  interested  in  poli(cs  tend  to  have  stronger  

par(sanship

Poli(cal  diversity  increases  during  the  elec(on  period.

Page 62: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

     SUMMARY  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Par(san  sharing  exist,  but  selec(vity  is  limited  

to  poli(cal  news

People  who  are  interested  in  poli(cs  tend  to  have  stronger  

par(sanship

Poli(cal  diversity  increases  during  the  elec(on  period.

Nega(ve:  related  to  distorted  percep(ons  

of  media  bias

Page 63: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

     SUMMARY  

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Par(san  sharing  exist,  but  selec(vity  is  limited  

to  poli(cal  news

People  who  are  interested  in  poli(cs  tend  to  have  stronger  

par(sanship

Poli(cal  diversity  increases  during  the  elec(on  period.

Posi(ve:  associated  with  people  who  are  knowledgeable  about  

poli(cs  and  are  ac(vely  engaged  in  

poli(cal  life

Nega(ve:  related  to  distorted  percep(ons  

of  media  bias

Page 64: About Partisan Sharing at COSN 2014

Amount of political news consumption

Political leaning

Time

Partisan sharing

Perceived bias of news outlets

Political knowledge

Voting probability

Factors Consequences

Par(san  sharing  exist,  but  selec(vity  is  limited  

to  poli(cal  news

People  who  are  interested  in  poli(cs  tend  to  have  stronger  

par(sanship

Poli(cal  diversity  increases  during  the  elec(on  period.

Posi(ve:  associated  with  people  who  are  knowledgeable  about  

poli(cs  and  are  ac(vely  engaged  in  

poli(cal  life

Nega(ve:  related  to  distorted  percep(ons  

of  media  bias

COSN  2014  

Partisan  Sharing:    Facebook  Evidence  and  Societal  Consequences  

Jisun  An  (Qatar  Computing  Research  Institute,  Qatar)  

 with  Daniele  Quercia  (Yahoo  Labs  Barcelona,  Spain)  

Jon  Crowcroft  (University  of  Cambridge,  UK)