a31c-3041: comparing ground based and airborne aerosol
TRANSCRIPT
A31C-3041: Comparing ground‐based and airborne aerosol measurements during the DISCOVER‐AQ Colorado field deployment
Lee Thornhill1 ([email protected]), B.E. Anderson2, L.D. Ziemba2, A.J. Beyersdorf2, E.L. Winstead1, R. Moore2, M. Shook1, C. Corr2, G. Chen2, C. Hudgins1, J.D.W. Barrick1, R. Martin2, C.E. Jordan3, J. Hite4, and A. Nenes4
1 Science Systems and Applications Inc; 2 NASA Langley Research Center ; 3 Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH ; 4 Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia
Understanding the relationship between airborne and ground-based measurements is one of the key questions that the DISCOVER-AQ series of field deployments hope to be able to answer. To address this question, the NASA P-3B systematically conducted vertical profiles over at least six ground sites sampling down to about 1000 feet above ground level (AGL). These data are combined with missed approaches at local airports which provide vertically resolved information between the lowest spiral altitude and the ground-based measurements. During the last DISCOVER-AQ field deployment (Denver, CO; July-August 2014), NASA Langley made aerosol measurements onboard both the NASA P-3B and a mobile laboratory. Coincident measurements included aerosol number concentration, size distributions, along with optical properties such as aerosol scattering, extinction, and hygroscopicity. Two ground sites were sampled, as well as several road trips to sample emissions from feedlots, oil/gas mining operations, and smoke from distant wildfires. We present a comparison between airborne and ground-based measurements made at the two ground sites. Most of the sampling was done in low aerosol concentration environments, away from local sources. Combined, the two ground sites provide at least 30 comparisons between airborne and ground-based aerosol measurements.
Introd
uctio
n and Overview of D
‐AQ CO
Summary and Future Dire
ctions
DISCOVER-AQ CO Overview• The NASA P-3B was equipped with a complex suite of chemical and
aerosol instruments
• A total of 214 spirals were done over 6 ground sites and 108 missed approaches were performed at nearby airports in order to extend the profiles down to the surface
• NASA Langley’s Aerosol Research Group (LARGE) provided a coincident set of aerosol measurements to the ones they had on the NASA P-3B in a mobile laboratory (MACH-2)
Acknowledgement: This research was funded by NASA’s Earth Venture-1 Program through the Earth System Science Pathfinder (ESSP) Program Office. We wish to thank the ESSP Program Office for the support. We also would like to thank the pilots and flight crew of the NASA P-3B through the NASA Wallops Flight Facility for their support and important contributions.
Groun
d Site Location Info
Composite Flight Track Map showing all the flight tracks at each of the 6
waypoints, highlighting the BAO Tower (yellow dashed box) and Platteville
(yellow solid box) ground sites
Platteville Overpass E
xample
BAO Tow
er Overpass E
xample
BAO Tower (Erie, CO, elev 1584 m)• Located 25 miles North of Denver just west of I-25
• 300m instrumented tower, operated by NOAA-ETL
• Records data at 4 levels as well as on a moveable instrumented carriage
• Spent 18 days parked next to the tower (see below)
• Ground data showed excellent agreement with the airborne data
Platteville, CO (elev 1502.8 m, 37 mi NE of Denver)• Area surrounded by fracking operations
• Nearly vacant NOAA monitoring site
• Spent a week there sampling (late on 24 July through morning of 31 July)
• Highest aerosol scattering / extinction were in the morning and due to haze
• Rain washed out the atmosphere late on DOY 209
• Optical measurements and number concentrations show better agreement than the f(RH) calculations
Road Trips24 July 2014• Greeley, CO - sample feedlot emissions from
pre-sunrise to lunch• Greeley, CO – early afternoon sampling of
gas / oil open flaring (didn’t see much)• Up to Wyoming sampling gas & oil fields
29 July 2014• Quick trip to sample the Wiggins and
Magnum feedlots
7 August 2014• Wildfire smoke chasing – north to Cheyenne,
west towards Salt Lake City, ending up in Idaho Falls as the forecasts evolved
8 August 2014• Sawtooth National Forest & Sun Valley, ID
for more smoke chasing from distant fires9 August 2014• Return to BAO tower – mainly vehicle
exhaust sampled, no smoke next morning
07/27/14 – P-3B Science Flight 06• Ground ops were located at
Platteville
• Penn State’s group launched 2 balloons at 12:17 and 14:37
• P-3B Made 3 Spirals (Local Time)1. 12:09 – 12:162. 14:28 – 14:363. 16:02 – 16:08
• Biomass burning aerosols aloft, but none mixed down to the surface
• Possibility that the P-3B sampled their own exhaust (spike in CN)
Soundings• First ozonesonde
showed a small surface layer with a mixed layer up to 2.3 km
• Four hours later the mixed layer extended from the surface all the way up to about 3.3 km
• Air masses originated over SE Montana
• Particles travelled over the eastern plains and stayed to the east of the urban Denver area
48 hour HYSPLIT back trajectories
First Spiral (12:09 – 12:16) Second Spiral (14:28 – 14:36)
08/02/14 – P-3B Sci Flights 10 (L1 & L2)
• Ground ops was located at BAO Tower
• P-3B Made 3 Spirals (local times)1. 09:18 – 09:352. 11:44 – 12:013. 14:54 – 15:11
• In addition, missed approaches were made at the neighboring Parkland airstrip
• Cleanest aerosol levels morning of the campaign
Soundings (left)• Mixed layer grew during
the day, extending up to 3.5 km by the final spiral
• Sampled airmass had subsided from the central plains
HYSPLIT Back Traj. (right)• 48 hours prior HYSPLIT
suggest the airmasses were at 2500 m AGL
First Spiral (09
:18 –09
:35)
Second
Spiral (11
:44 –12
:01)
Smoke chasing in the Sawtooth National Forest, ID• Red box – smoke encounter• Green box – likely emissions from passing cars
60000
40000
20000
0
cn37
75 (c
m-3
)
210.0209.0208.0207.0206.0
P-3B overpass data in green triangles
60000
40000
20000
0
cn37
75 (c
m-3
)
216.0215.0214.0213.0212.0
P-3B overpass data in green triangles
Collected data during 18 P‐3B overpasses
• Mixed layer extended to over 3 km
• Better agreement in the optical and CN measurements.
• Offset present in the Platteville f(RH) data, future work will determine why
• Mixed layer had not yet extended down to the surface
• Good agreement with optical and CN measurements at the lowest P-3B altitudes (was only 1800 m due to air traffic control restrictions)
320316312308Theta (K)
5500
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
GPS
Alti
tude
(m)
Spiral #1
320315Theta (K)
Spiral #2
322320318316314Theta (K)
Spiral #3
Third
Spiral (14
:54 –15
:11)
• Very low scattering
• Extinction ≈ Scattering therefore very little aerosol absorption
• Better agreement between P-3B and ground later in day as the mixed layer strengthened
• CN concentrations doubled from spiral 2 to spiral 3 due to small particles
• Great agreement in the f(RH) measurements
Initial Summary of Preliminary Observations
• When the P-3B was able to descend into the mixed layer, the NASA LARGE ground based dry scattering measurements agreed very well with the airborne based optical data
• The scanning humidifier system appears to agree better at the BAO tower ground site than at the Platteville ground site
• The dry extinction appears to exhibit a slight offset compared to the dry scattering which cannot be attributed to aerosol absorption, requiring some future evaluation
• The mean P-3B aerosol number concentrations agree well with the ground-based data
• The ambient scattering values were nearly equal to the dry scattering values, due to the low relative humidity observed over the Front Range of Colorado
Future Direction• Submit data to the DISCOVER-AQ archive
• Compare the size distributions from the ground and aircraft
• Determine why the f(RH) data agrees better at the BAO Tower ground site than at Platteville
• Add additional analysis prior to the DISCOVER-AQ Science Team Meeting in May
Coincident LARGE aerosol measurements include:
320310Theta (deg C)
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
GPS
Alti
tude
(km
)
Sounding 112:17 - 13:51
325320315Theta (deg C)
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
Sounding 214:37 - 16:09
Measured Parameter P‐3B Instruments MACH‐2 Mobile Lab Instruments
Aerosol Number Concentration(CN)
TSI‐3025 (CN > 4 nm)TSI‐3010 (CN > 10 nm)
TSI‐3775 (CN > 4 nm)
Aerosol Particle Size Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) (0.01‐0.3 µm)
SMPS (0.008‐0.3 µm)
DMT Ultra‐High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer (UHSAS) (0.06‐1.0 µm)
TSI Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer (EEPS) (0.006‐0.52 µm)
TSI Aerosol Particle Sizer (APS) 3321 APS 3321
Total (Dry & Wet) Scattering (450, 550, and 700 nm)
2 x TSI 3563 Nephelometers 2 x TSI 3563 Nephelometers
Aerosol Hygroscopicity System humidifies aerosols to 80% RH Scanning system switches between dry (< 40%), 60%, 70%, and 80% RH in steps
Aerosol Absorption Radiance Research Particle Soot Absorption Photometers (PSAP) (467, 532, and 660 nm)
Thermo Multi‐Angle Absorption Photometer (MAAP) (660 nm)
20000
10000
0
cn37
75 (c
m-3
)
15:04 15:06 15:08 15:10 15:12 15:14
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
f(RH
) (80
% &
20%
)
15:04 15:06 15:08 15:10 15:12 15:14
30
20
10
0
Dry
SC
(Mm
-1)
15:04 15:06 15:08 15:10 15:12 15:14
20000
10000
0
cn37
75 (c
m-3
)
11:56 11:58 12:00 12:02
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
f(RH
) (80
% &
20%
)
11:56 11:58 12:00 12:02
30
20
10
0
Dry
SC
(Mm
-1)
11:56 11:58 12:00 12:02
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
cn37
75 (c
m-3
)
09:30 09:32 09:34 09:36
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
f(RH
) (80
% &
20%
)
09:30 09:32 09:34 09:36
30
20
10
0
Dry
SC
(Mm
-1)
09:30 09:32 09:34 09:36
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
f(RH
) (80
% &
20%
)
14:28 14:30 14:32 14:34 14:36 14:38
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
cn37
75 (c
m-3
)
14:28 14:30 14:32 14:34 14:36 14:38
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Dry
SC
(Mm
-1)
14:28 14:30 14:32 14:34 14:36 14:3860
50
40
30
20
10
0
Dry
EXT
(Mm
-1)
14:28 14:30 14:32 14:34 14:36 14:38
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Dry
EXT
(Mm
-1)
12:10 12:12 12:14 12:16 12:18
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Dry
SC
(Mm
-1)
12:10 12:12 12:14 12:16 12:181.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
f(RH
) (80
% &
20%
)
12:10 12:12 12:14 12:16 12:18
2400020000160001200080004000
0
cn37
75 (c
m-3
)
12:10 12:12 12:14 12:16 12:18
Collected data during 6 P‐3B overpasses
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
f(RH
) 80%
& 2
0%
216.0215.0214.0213.0212.0DOY (with respect to local time)
Red line = P‐3BBlue line = Ground Data
Red line = P‐3BBlue line = Ground Data
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Opt
ical
Dat
a (M
m-1
)
216.0215.0214.0213.0212.0
Dry Scattering550 nm Ground P-3 Overpass
120
80
40
0
Opt
ical
Dat
a (M
m-1
)
210.0209.0208.0207.0206.0
Dry Scattering550 nm Ground P-3 Overpass
Extinction (Mm‐1)
P‐3B Flight07/27/14
P‐3B Flight07/28/14
P‐3B Flight07/31/14
P‐3B Flight08/02/14
P‐3B Flight08/03/14
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
f(RH
) 80%
& 2
0%
210.0209.0208.0207.0206.0DOY (with respect to local time)