a zebrafish functional genomics model to …...2020/02/23 · 88 many of the mammalian components...
TRANSCRIPT
1
A zebrafish functional genomics model to investigate the role of human A20 variants in 2
vivo 3
4
Authors: 5
Cultrone, Daniele1,2; Zammit, W. Nathan1,2; Self, Eleanor1,2; Postert, Benno2,3; Han, Jeremy 6
ZR2,4; Bailey, Jacqueline1,2; Warren, Joanna1,2; Croucher, David R2,4; Kikuchi, Kazu2,5; 7
Bogdanovic, Ozren2,6; Chtanova, Tatyana1,2; Hesselson, Daniel2,3; Grey, Shane T. 1,2† 8
9
Affiliations: 10 1Immunology Division; 3Diabetes Division; 4The Kinghorn Cancer Centre; 6Epigenetics 11
Division; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 12
2010 Australia 13 2St Vincent’s Clinical School, The University of New South Wales Sydney, New South Wales, 14
2010 Australia. 15 5Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Division, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, 16
Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia 17
18
†Corresponding Author and Lead Contact: Email [email protected] (S.T.G.) 19
20
Running title: A new zebrafish model to investigate A20 gene variants in vivo 21
22
23
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
SUMMARY 24
Germline loss-of-function variation in TNFAIP3, encoding A20, has been implicated in a wide 25
variety of autoinflammatory and autoimmune conditions, with acquired somatic missense 26
mutations linked to cancer progression. Furthermore, human sequence data reveals that the A20 27
locus contains ~400 non-synonymous coding variants which are largely uncharacterised. The 28
growing number of A20 coding variants with unknown function, but potential clinical impact, 29
poses a challenge to traditional mouse-based approaches. Here we report the development of a 30
novel functional genomics approach that utilises the new A20-deficient zebrafish (Danio rerio) 31
model to investigate the impact of TNFAIP3 genetic variants in vivo. Similar to A20-deficient 32
mice, A20-deficient zebrafish are hyper-responsive to inflammatory triggers and exhibit 33
spontaneous early lethality. While ectopic addition of human A20 rescued A20-null zebrafish from 34
lethality, missense mutations at two conserved A20 residues, S381A and C243Y reversed this 35
protective effect. Ser381 represents a phosphorylation site important for enhancing A20 activity 36
that is abrogated by its mutation to alanine, or by a C243Y mutation that associates with human 37
autoimmune disease. These data reveal an evolutionarily conserved role for A20, but also 38
demonstrate how a zebrafish functional genomics pipeline can be utilized to investigate the in vivo 39
significance of medically relevant TNFAIP3 gene variants. This approach could be utilised to 40
investigate genetic variation for other conserved genes. 41
42
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
INTRODUCTION 43
In mammals, the cytoplasmic ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20, encoded by the TNFAIP3 gene, plays 44
a key role in maintaining inflammatory homeostasis 1 mediated by its function to inhibit NF-κB 45
activation 2-6. The medical importance of A20’s role in dampening NF-κB is highlighted by cases 46
of germline A20 loss-of-function mutations in humans who present with severe autoinflammatory 47
disease 7,8, and by the impact of A20 deletion in mice which results in spontaneous and widespread 48
NF-κB activation, multi-organ inflammation and premature lethality 1,9. The emergence of A20 49
mutations and coding variants as causal genetic factors driving human disease 10,11 highlight the 50
need to better understand A20’s functional domains controlling inflammation in vivo. 51
52
A20 suppresses NF-κB signalling with inhibitory activity against key molecular substrates 53
including signalling molecules TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) 9, receptor interacting 54
protein 1 (RIP1) 12,13, and the IκB kinase complex (IKK) 14. The A20 ovarian-tumour (OTU) 55
domain exhibits deubiquitinating editing (DUB) activity cantered on Cys103, which cleaves 56
activating K63-linked ubiquitin chains from RIPK1, TRAF6 and NEMO to terminate NF-κB 57
signalling 9,12,13,15. The A20 zinc finger 4 (ZnF4) exhibits E3 ligase activity, adding K48-linked 58
ubiquitin chains to RIPK1, triggering RIPK1 proteolysis 12,16. In addition, the C-terminal ZnF7 59
domain of A20 binds linear ubiquitin to non-catalytically suppress NF-κB activity 17. A20 is 60
regulated at the level of gene transcription 6, whereby NF-κB activation induces TNFAIP3 61
expression 18,19 forming a negative feedback loop, and the inhibitory activities of A20 enzymatic 62
sites are enhanced by IKKB-mediated serine phosphorylation at Ser381 20,21. 63
64
We previously showed that coding variants that impair A20 Ser381 phosphorylation 13, and 65
thereby reduce the activity of both enzymatic Cys103 and ZnF4 domains of A20 12,20, exhibited a 66
much larger in vivo effect in mice than mutations that disable the individual enzymatic sites 67
Cys103 and ZnF4 13,21,22. These data point towards an important role for non-catalytic Ser381 in 68
regulating A20’s anti-inflammatory activity in vivo, however, the in vivo impact of deleting Ser381 69
has not been tested. 70
71
The importance of A20 in human disease, as well as the emerging functional complexities 72
highlighted by experimental studies examining A20 mutations, coupled with the discovery of 73
100’s of new TNFAIP3 coding variants from human genome sequencing studies (e.g. gnomAD) 74
highlight the need for novel approaches to investigate A20 functional domains. We hypothesised 75
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
that elucidation of A20’s conserved motifs across additional species may aid the resolution of 76
A20’s functional domains as well as highlight protein domains of relevance to human disease. 77
Here we report the development of a novel functional genomics model that utilises the new A20-78
deficient zebrafish (Danio rerio) model to investigate the impact of TNFAIP3 genetic variants in 79
vivo. Using this zebrafish paradigm we highlight the strong evolutionary conservation of A20’s 80
role to maintain inflammatory homeostasis, and demonstrate how a zebrafish functional genomics 81
approach can be utilized to investigate the in vivo significance of human TNFAIP3 gene variants. 82
This same approach could be utilised to increase understanding of the impact of human genetic 83
variation for other highly conserved genes. 84
85
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
RESULTS 86
Genomic analysis of the zebrafish tnfaip3 locus. 87
Many of the mammalian components of the NF-κB signalling system 23,24 and innate immunity 25 88
are conserved in zebrafish making this animal model a candidate in vivo paradigm for the analysis 89
of A20’s key functional motifs. This concept was further supported by analysis of zebrafish 90
genomic data which revealed gene order preservation of the TNFAIP3 locus with OLIG3 and 91
PERP in zebrafish (Figure S1A), and a conserved and easily identifiable Topologically Associating 92
Domain (TADs) overlapping with A20 and highly enriched in the regulatory histone mark 93
H3K27ac (histone 3, lysine 27 acetylation) (Figure S1B), a hallmark of active promoters and 94
enhancers 26,27. Furthermore, some of these conserved H3K27c marked regions overlapped with 95
the positions of A20 SNPs identified in human genome wide association studies (GWAS) to be 96
linked with Crohn’s disease and Systemic lupus erythematosus (Figure S1A). The tnfaip3 97
zebrafish orthologue encoding a predicted 762 amino acid polypeptide comprising an N-terminal 98
ovarian tumour (OTU) domain (identity score of 94/100), including the putative catalytic cysteine 99
at position 103 in A20’s OTU domain 28, and seven zinc finger motifs in the C-terminus (identity 100
scores of 79/100) (Figure S2). The zebrafish A20 C-terminal domain also contained zinc finger 4 101
(ZnF4) and ZnF7 regions, which showed multiple sequence alignment scores of 91/100 and 102
100/100 respectively, and are thus highly homologous to functional ZnF4 and ZnF7 domains 103
identified in mammalian studies 17,21. In mammalian cells A20 expression is controlled at the level 104
of transcription by the NF-κB pathway in response to microbial stimulation of TLR 19, a pathway 105
that represents a key component of innate immunity conserved in zebrafish 29. Stimulation of 106
cultured zebrafish embryos 3 days post-fertilization (dpf) with 75 µg/ml of the gram-negative 107
bacteria product lipopolysaccharide (LPS) also resulted in the rapid induction of zebrafish (zf) 108
zfA20 (tnfaip3) mRNA as well as TNF (tnf), zfIL-1beta (il1b) and zfIL-6 (il6) mRNA (Figure 1 109
A and B). 110
111
Generation of a zebrafish model of A20 deficiency. 112
An optimal zebrafish functional genomics model to test human A20 variants would have an A20 113
null genetic background. Because A20 deletion in zebrafish had not been previously reported, we 114
utilised site directed transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) to introduce a 115
disabling mutation within exon 2 of the zebrafish A20 locus (Figure 1C). A zebrafish line was 116
identified that showed a 20 bp deletion in the tnfaip3 sequence which was predicted to introduce 117
a premature truncation at amino acid 127 (tnfaip3gi3, hereafter A20∆127; Figure 1C). Heterozygous 118
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
A20∆127 zebrafish were bred to homozygosity and deletion of A20 was confirmed in offspring by 119
high-resolution melting assay (HRMA), Sanger sequencing, and analysis of PCR products that 120
differentiate A20 wild-type alleles from A20+/∆127, and A20∆127/∆127 (Figure S3). Heterozygous 121
A20∆127 zebrafish were mated to generate A20+/+, A20+/∆127, and A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish. 122
123
A20 deficiency is lethal in zebrafish. 124
To validate the use of A20 deficient zebrafish for testing human A20 variants, we investigated the 125
impact of zebrafish A20 deletion with respect to sentinel A20 phenotypes reported in mammals. 126
The key mouse phenotypes reported in the literature include loss of organ homeostasis, gross 127
anatomical changes (i.e. runting) and premature lethality 1, as well as hyper-responsiveness to 128
TLR-induced NF-κB activity and heightened macrophage activity 9,30. Accordingly, A20+/+, 129
A20+/∆127, and A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish were followed through time to assess survival. A20∆127/∆127 130
zebrafish presented in the expected Mendelian ratios at 1 week post-fertilization (wpf), however, 131
by 2wpf zebrafish homozygous for A20 deletion presented with premature lethality and no 132
A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish survived to three weeks post-fertilization (Figure 1D). Many A20∆127/∆127 133
zebrafish also exhibited gross abnormalities including reduced body size (Figure 1E) and evident 134
malformations of the torso (Figure 1F). In contrast, but like mice heterozygous for A20 deletion 1, 135
A20+/∆127 zebrafish were viable and showed no gross phenotype or lethality. Mice lacking A20 136
present with a rapid and early onset of systemic inflammation of the organs particularly the liver 137 1. To examine the impact of A20 deletion upon organ homeostasis A20 deficient zebrafish were 138
crossed with 2-Color Liver Insulin acinar Pancreas (2CLIP) zebrafish, which express dsRed 139
fluorescent protein driven by the fatty acid binding protein 10 (fabp10) promoter in hepatocytes 140 31. A20∆127/∆127:2CLIP zebrafish are phenotypically runted but also show a marked reduction in 141
liver area disproportionate to their body size when compared to WT zebrafish (Figure 1G). 142
Reduction in liver size was not due to a developmental defect as liver size was normal in 1 wpf 143
A20∆127/∆127:2CLIP zebrafish. Confocal analysis of A20∆127/∆127:2CLIP zebrafish livers (Figure 144
1H), revealed a reduction in liver cellularity, and an increase in the frequency of caspase-3 positive 145
hepatocytes. 146
147
A20 limits NF-κB activation in zebrafish. 148
To investigate NF-κB activation in A20 deficient zebrafish we crossed A20+/∆127 zebrafish to a 149
NF-κB:EGFP transgenic zebrafish reporter line. The responsiveness of NF-κB activation in 150
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
zebrafish in vivo is a direct result of colonisation by environmental microbiota 24. As shown in 151
Figure 2A and B, on a wild type background the NF-κB:EGFP reporter demonstrates spontaneous 152
activation. NF-κB driven fluorescence was found to be at its highest expression in those tissues 153
that mostly interact with the external environment, namely the mouth, neuromasts, pharyngeal 154
tooth and gills (Figure 2A a, b, c, d). Also, NF-κB driven fluorescence increased through time 155
(compare 3dpf A20+/+ zebrafish with 6dpf; Figure 2B) most likely reflecting exposure to 156
environmental microbiota 24, and this was increased further in A20+/∆127 and A20∆127/∆127 157
zebrafish in a gene dose manner (Figure 2B, C and D). Furthermore, the addition of LPS to 158
zebrafish embryos further enhanced NF-κB activation and this was most pronounced in 159
A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish (Figure 2C and D). NF-κB controls the expression of inflammatory 160
response genes, and A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish showed increased basal expression of MPEG1 (Figure 161
2E), a macrophage expressed NF-κB regulated gene 32-34. 162
163
Zebrafish A20-deficient macrophages are hyper responsive to inflammatory triggers 164
A20 loss of function mutations result in macrophage hyper responsiveness to microbial stimulation 165
and spontaneous inflammasome activation 9,13,17. Tissue macrophages play a key role in sensing 166
pathogenic microbiota in zebrafish 33,35. To investigate the impact of A20 deletion on macrophage 167
homeostasis, heterozygous A20+/∆127 zebrafish were crossed to a macrophage reporter line 168
whereby RFP is expressed under the control of the promotor of macrophage-expressed gene 1.1 169
(mpeg1.1) 36. Loss of A20 completely altered both the number and phenotype of tissue 170
macrophages in ways consistent with increased cellular response to stimulation. The number of 171
macrophages detected in the skin was 2-3 fold higher in A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish when compared 172
to their wild type counterparts (Figure 3A and C). Furthermore, the majority of the dermal 173
macrophages in A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish exhibited dendritic extensions (Figure 3A) indicative of an 174
activated state 37,38. This was made further apparent by histological analysis through transverse 175
sections of the cranium, which revealed dense infiltration of mpeg1.1 positive cells close to the 176
dermal surface (Figure 3E). The position of the mpeg1.1 positive cells corresponded with cells at 177
the dermal surface exhibiting bright NF-κB:EGFP reporter activity (Figure 3E). 178
179
Recruitment to sites of inflammation constitute important physiological roles for the macrophage 180
immune compartment 35. Using a tail clip wound model 39 we found that both A20+/∆127 and 181
A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish showed an increased recruitment of macrophages at the wound interface 182
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
through time (Figure 3F). Interestingly, this analysis revealed a macrophage phenotype for 183
heterozygous A20+/∆127 zebrafish post challenge whereas we did not observe a change in 184
A20+/∆127 macrophage numbers in the steady state (Figure 3A and C). To investigate this further, 185
we used two-photon imaging of single mpeg1.1:RFP reporter A20+/∆127 zebrafish to track 186
individual macrophage cell movement in vivo in real time (Figure 3G). This analysis revealed that 187
A20+/∆127 macrophages exhibited increased cell movement (Figure 3G), attributed to an increase 188
in their average track speed, displacement and length (Figure 3H). In addition to macrophages, T 189
cell numbers were also increased in A20 deficient zebrafish (Figure 3B and D), a phenotype 190
comparable to A20-deficient mice which exhibit increased numbers of CD3+ lymphocytes 1. 191
192
Human A20 rescues A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish from lethality 193
The phenotypic similarities between A20-deficient zebrafish and those reported for A20-deficient 194
mice 1,9,17, as well as the profound inflammatory syndromes reported for human subjects with 195
heterozygous A20 deficiency 8, supported utilising zebrafish as a model organism to investigate 196
the role of A20 protein domains in regulating its function in vivo. For our functional analysis 197
pipeline, we determined that rescue of A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish from lethality would provide the 198
most robust readout for loss or gain of function phenotypes in various A20 genetic variants. For 199
the functional analysis, zebrafish eggs derived from A20+/∆127 x A20+/∆127 crosses were 200
ectopically injected with wild-type human (h)A20 expressed in the construct Ubb-hA20-P2A-201
EGFP that also expresses GFP. The low integration Ubb-hA20-P2A-EGFP construct was 202
deliberately chosen to limit potential off-target effects as well as false positives 40-42. The zebrafish 203
eggs were injected in a blinded fashion with the Ubb-hA20-P2A-EGFP construct and at 3wpf 204
surviving zebrafish were assessed for their genotype and the presence of GFP fluorescence (Figure 205
S5A). At 1 wpf A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish presented in the expected mendelian ratios of ~25% but 206
exhibited a highly penetrant lethal phenotype, with no survivors at 3wpf (Figure 1D). In contrast, 207
with ectopic expression of hA20, A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish comprised 9.91% of the total genotypes 208
at 3wpf (Figure 4A). Given an expected Mendelian ratio of 25%, ectopic expression of hA20 209
rescued~40% of A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish from lethality. 210
211
Alanine substitution of Ser381 and the human mutation C243Y impair A20’s in vivo function 212
We previously showed that a series of three different A20 coding variants, all within A20’s OTU 213
domain, showed a strong correlation between a graded loss of A20’s NF-κB inhibitory function 214
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
and an increasing hyper inflammatory in vivo phenotype with reduced phosphorylation at Ser381 215 13. The coding variant C243Y which showed the strongest in vivo phenotype and caused the 216
greatest reduction in Ser381 phosphorylation was originally identified in a four generation 217
Japanese family with hereditary autoinflammatory disease 7. In vitro biochemical studies show 218
that IκB kinase beta (IKKβ)-dependent phosphorylation at Ser381 is required for A20’s optimal 219
NF-κB and JNK suppressive function 13,20,43 (Figure 4B; Figure S5B and C). Both Ser381 and 220
Cys243 are conserved in zebrafish (Figure S2) allowing us to test the impact of alanine substitution 221
at Ser381, and the impact of the disease causing variant C243Y on the ability of human A20 to 222
rescue A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish from lethality. 223
224
As shown in Figure 4B, A20∆127/∆127 embryos that received either S381A or C243Y expressing 225
constructs were found in reduced numbers when compared to A20∆127/∆127 embryos that received 226
wild type hA20-expressing constructs. Specificity for the impact of S381A and C243Y on A20’s 227
in vivo function was shown by ectopic injection of another OTU domain mutant, namely the 228
C103A DUB mutant 13,21,22, which exhibited no negative impact on hA20’s ability to block NF-229
kB or JNK signalling in vitro (respectively Figure 4B; Figure S5B and C), nor A20’s ability to 230
rescue A20∆127/∆127 embryos from lethality (Figure 4A). The in vivo rescue properties of 231
individual A20 mutants did not relate to differences in protein stability, as shown by Western blot 232
analysis of A20 protein levels when expressed in cell lines (Figure 4B) 13, nor differences in the 233
levels of transgene expression in vivo as measured by the levels of GFP fluorescence which is co-234
expressed with A20 in the Ubb-hA20-P2A-EGFP construct (Figure S5A). 235
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
DISCUSSION 236
A20 inhibits NF-κB activation in mammals in response to TLR signals 1,9, and uncontrolled NF-237
κB activation results in excessive inflammation and lethality 44, yet there is little information 238
regarding the in vivo functional role of A20 beyond studies in mammalian models. An A20-like 239
protein sequence has been identified in the purple sea urchin and amphioxus 45 and in the lamprey 240
genomes 46 and here we identify a functional A20 homologue in zebrafish. In contrast, we did not 241
find a homologous A20 sequence in the genomes of lower invertebrates including Drosophila. 242
Similar to mammalian cells, and as shown here for zebrafish, A20 expression in amphioxus is also 243
regulated by LPS 19,45 and A20 modulates NF-κB signalling utilizing a ubiquitin editing function 244 13,21,45. However, the in vivo functional significance of A20 in amphioxus has not been tested 45. 245
Reminiscent of mouse data 1,9, we found that A20 deficiency in zebrafish was lethal and 246
remarkably re-introduction of human A20 could rescue a proportion of A20-deficient zebrafish 247
from lethality. We interpret these data to suggest that A20 arose during chordate evolution to 248
regulate inflammatory homeostasis and prevent lethality, most likely in response to environmental 249
microbial stimuli. As the major components of NF-κB signalling in mammals are conserved to 250
Drosophila 13,47 it is unclear as to why A20-dependent control of NF-κB signalling was required 251
for chordate evolution. Also, in mammalian cells A20 has been shown to regulate diverse 252
signalling cascades that control inflammation and cell death in both hematopoietic and non-253
hematopoietic cell lineages 10,48. Further investigation of A20’s function in non-mammalian 254
systems like zebrafish will reveal to what extent these critical mammalian functions extend to other 255
chordates and aid our understanding of the evolutionary significance of A20. 256
257
Gene targeting in mice to either introduce an alanine at Cys103 (C103A) that eliminates 258
biochemical OTU DUB activity 21, or a mutation that destroys the ZnF4 E3 ligase activity of A20 259 22, resulted in surprisingly little or no impact on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) responses and 260
inflammatory homeostasis in vivo 22,49, contrasting the lethal hyper-inflammatory phenotype of 261
A20-deficient mice 1,9. These findings indicate compensatory activity of the Cys103 and ZnF4 262
catalytic domains towards each other, and redundancy in the mechanism by which the OTU 263
domain regulates NF-κB activation which may include both catalytic and non-catalytic roles 12,14. 264
Previous biochemical studies have shown that A20’s NF-κB inhibitory activity requires 265
phosphorylation at Ser381 by IκB-kinase 20,21. We previously provided indirect evidence for the 266
importance of Ser381 in vivo 13. We have recently demonstrated how a series of A20 coding 267
variants that cause a decrease in phosphorylation at Ser381 also decrease A20’s NF-κB inhibitory 268
activity in a graded manner, with a corresponding loss in the ability of A20 to control inflammatory 269
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
homeostasis in vivo. Here, using a new zebrafish functional genomics approach, we show evidence 270
that Ser381 phosphorylation is needed for A20’s optimal anti-inflammatory function in vivo, as 271
targeted mutation of Ser381 impairs the ability of A20 to rescue A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish from 272
lethality. Prevention of Ser381 phosphorylation may disable both OTU DUB and ZnF4 ubiquitin 273
editing functions most likely explaining to the highly penetrant phenotype seen for both zebrafish 274
and mice 13 compared to the individual inactivation of catalytic domains 22,49. Further studies are 275
required to understand how phosphorylation at Ser381 impacts A20’s function but one possibility 276
is that phosphorylation causes changes to A20 structure facilitating interactions between A20’s 277
distinct ubiquitin binding and ubiquitin editing domains. 278
279
Mutations in the A20 ZnF7 non catalytic NF-κB inhibitory domain cause spontaneous 280
macrophage inflammasome activation and arthritis in mice 17. The cell type specific and different 281
phenotype of ZnF7 mutant mice to that reported for mice with reduced Ser381 phosphorylation 13 282
suggests that A20 regulatory functions can be distinguished from one another. Ser381 may regulate 283
both OTU and the ZnF4 dependent-ubiquitin editing functions, whilst ZnF7 regulates linear 284
ubiquitin chains outside the aforementioned mentioned domains. This highlights how specific A20 285
functional domains are important within particular physiological and/or cellular contexts. 286
Understanding how specific molecular changes in A20 function link to cellular phenotypes may 287
provide a pathway to understand the seemingly broad association of A20 to many different tissue 288
specific autoimmune diseases identified through GWAS 10 and the broad clinical phenotypes 289
emerging in patients identified with A20 haploinsufficiency 43,50,51. 290
291
A20 deletion results in severe autoinflammatory disease in humans 30,52-55. The severe 292
impact of mutating Ser381 on A20 function shown here, and the discovery of an ever increasing 293
number of new A20 coding variants through human sequencing studies 13, raise the question as to 294
the existence of further human coding variants which may present with highly penetrant 295
phenotypes and contribute to disease. The conservation of A20 in zebrafish allows us to construct 296
a functional genomics pipeline to investigate the impact of medically and scientifically important 297
A20 coding variants in vivo. The discovery 7 of the cysteine to tyrosine substitution at position 243 298
(C243Y) in a four generation Japanese family with a Behcet’s like disease, together with the high 299
level of sequence homology across the mammalian and zebrafish OTU domain which included 300
this residue, provided an opportunity to test the sensitivity of the zebrafish pipeline. In this 301
zebrafish model the C243Y mutation caused a reduction in A20’s ability to rescue homozygous 302
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
A20-null zebrafish from lethality. This in vivo proof of concept data in the zebrafish model 303
showing that C243Y is a reduction of function variant is supported by the human genetic data 7, 304
as well as biochemical and mouse data 13. A20 variants like C243Y that modify phosphorylation 305
at Ser381 therefore represent a novel class of variants with medically relevant disease-causing 306
potential. 307
308
We highlight the potential of the zebrafish system to advance our knowledge of medically 309
significant A20 gene variants by taking advantage of regions of high homology. In addition to 310
shedding light on the functional significance of A20 coding variants, the conservation of the 311
zebrafish A20 genomic locus may also aid the elucidation of non-coding variants. GWAS studies 312
associate A20 with multiple autoimmune conditions and many identified SNPs are non coding 10. 313
Analysis of conserved trans regulatory regions in the A20 locus marked by active methylation 314
marks revealed an overlap with two SNPs associated with Crohn’s disease (rs7753394; rs7773904) 315
(GRCh38) and one associated with Systemic lupus erythematosus (rs10499197) 56-58. As these 316
SNP’s lay in putative enhancer regions they may alter A20 expression levels thereby contributing 317
to disease. The development of a novel functional genomics pipeline that utilises the new A20-318
deficient zebrafish model provides a new tool to investigate the impact of TNFAIP3 genetic 319
variants in vivo. Understanding the underlying genetic code of A20 will have relevance for 320
understanding human disease mechanisms and the development of targeted drug therapies. This 321
same approach could be utilised to increase understanding of the impact of human genetic variation 322
for other highly conserved genes. 323
324
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 325
We thank the Biological Testing Facility at the Garvan Institute of Medical Research for fish care, 326
and David Zahra (Genomic Engineering, Garvan Institute of Medical Research) for helpful advice 327
with design of TALEN constructs, cloning and site directed mutagenesis of A20 mutants. We 328
thank Dr John Rawls (Department of Cell and Molecular Physiology, University of North 329
Carolina, Chapel Hill) for the NF-κB:EGFP transgenic construct. D.C. and N.W.Z were each 330
supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and N.W.Z. is an International Pancreas and Islet 331
Transplant Association (IPITA) Derek Gray Fellow. The research was supported by National 332
Health and Medical Research (NHMRC) grants to S.T.G. (1130222, 1189235) and K.K. 333
(1130247); as well as grants to S.T.G. from the NIH (DK076169) and the Australian Juvenile 334
Diabetes Research Foundation (3-SRA-2018-604-M-B). S.T.G. is NHMRC Senior Research 335
Fellow (1140691). 336
337
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS 338
D.C., B.P., D.H. and S.T.G generated the Tg(NF-κB, c-FOS:EGFP)GI1 and D.C. and S.T.G. 339
generated the tnfaip3GI2 zebrafish lines. Genomic analysis of the zebrafish tnfaip3 locus was 340
conducted by O.B.. All in vivo zebrafish studies were conducted by D.C. Cloning of human A20 341
and A20 mutants, Western blotting experiments and NF-κB reporter assays were conducted by 342
D.C. and N.Z.W. JNK reporter assays were conducted by D.C., J.Z.M.H. and D.R.C.. J.B. and 343
T.C. carried out intravital imaging. Immunohistochemistry was conducted by J.W., D.C and E.S.. 344
Zebrafish expertise and essential experimental advice for use of zebrafish reporter lines was 345
provided by K.K. D.C., N.W.Z., B.P., J.Z.R.H., J.W., D.C., K.H., T.C., D.H. and S.T.G. critically 346
assessed data. D.C. and S.T.G. co-wrote the manuscript. S.T.G. devised and led the experimental 347
plan and is guarantor of the study. 348
349
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS 350
The authors declare no competing financial interests. 351
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
FIGURE LEGENDS. 352
Figure 1 A20-deficient zebrafish fail to thrive 353
A Zebrafish were stimulated with 75 µg/ml LPS and assayed for gene expression (mRNA) at 30 354
min intervals. Each data point represents an N=3 pools of 10 fish each per group from three 355
independent crosses. Data represented as mean ± SD. B Individual marker peak induction, and 356
relative p-values. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. C Gene targeting of A20 highlighting the 20 bp deletion 357
and predicted stop codon at amino acid 127, previously a Leucine. D Percentages of surviving 358
A20+/+, A20+/∆127 and A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish at 1, 2, 3 and 8wpf, generated from N=15 A20+/∆127 359
crosses. E Body area measured in (pixel/inch) per zebrafish genotype at 1 and 2 wpf. Each dot 360
represents an individual zebrafish. Data represented as mean ± SD, P-values were determined 361
using 1way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001. Each group passed the normality test. F 362
Representative brightfield image of one A20+/+ (top) and A20∆127/∆127 (bottom) zebrafish at 2 wpf. 363
Scale bars represent 2 mm. G Body to liver ratios measured in (pixel/inch) per zebrafish genotype 364
at 1 and 2 wpf. Each dot represents an individual zebrafish. Data represented as mean ± SD, P-365
values were determined using 1way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001. Each group passed the 366
normality test. For each genotype a representative A20+/+, A20+/∆127 and A20∆127/∆127 2 wpf 367
zebrafish is shown. The scale bars represent 2 mm. H Immuno-fluorescence sections of livers from 368
2CLIP reporter fish for the A20 genotypes. The scale bars represent 300µm. 369
370
Figure 2 A20 is necessary to maintain inflammatory homeostasis in zebrafish 371
A Representative fluorescent image of a NF-κB:eGFP zebrafish at 6 dpf showing spontaneous NF-372
κB activity (fluorescence) in the (a) mouth, (b) lateral neuronmasts, (c) pharyngeal tooth, and (d) 373
gills. Scale bar represents 2mm. B Representative fluorescent images of NF-κB:eGFP zebrafish of 374
different A20 genotypes at 3 and 6 dpf ± LPS. The scale bars represent 1mm. C-D Cumulative 375
data of relative fluorescence units as in (E) of NF-κB:eGFP zebrafish by A20 genotype at; (F) 3dpf 376
without LPS stimulation and, (G), 6 dpf ± LPS. Each dot represents an individual fish. Data are 377
representative of N=10 crosses. N per group and mean values reported below each graph. Data 378
represented as mean ± SD, P-values were determined using 1-way ANOVA. Each group passed 379
the normality test. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. E Mpeg1 marker basal peaks at 380
1wpf, and relative p-values. *P < 0.05, N = 4 experiments of unstimulated zebrafish. 381
382
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 3 Impact of A20 deletion on macrophage activity in zebrafish. 383
A Representative fluorescent image of mpeg1.1:RFP;A20+/+ (top) and mpeg1.1:RFP;A20∆127/∆127 384
(bottom) zebrafish at 1wpf. B Representative fluorescent image of lck:RFP;A20+/+ (top) and 385
lck:RFP; A20∆127/∆127 (bottom) zebrafish at 1wpf. C Number of macrophages counted from 386
images of zebrafish by A20 genotype as in (A). Data represented as mean ± SD, P-values were 387
determined using Whelch’s t-test. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. D Number of T lymphocytes 388
counted from images of zebrafish by A20 genotype as in (B). Data represented as mean ± SD, P-389
values were determined using Whelch’s t-test. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. E Representative 390
transversal zebrafish head cryosections for a NF-κB:eGFP and mpeg1.1:RFP zebrafish for each 391
A20 genotype at 1 wpf. The scale bar represents 75 µm. F Average number of macrophages at the 392
site of injury measured every 2 hours and at 1 and 2 days post-injury. Error bands are SEM. Area 393
under the curve was significant for A20+/+ x A20+/∆127 (****P < 0.0001) and A20+/+ x A20∆127/∆127 394
(***P < 0.001). G Macrophages from mpeg1.1:RFP positive zebrafish were imaged using in vivo 395
two-photon microscopy and their track displacement, track duration and track length were 396
quantified. Data collected from 4 A20+/+ and 3 A20+/∆127 comprising of 68 and 98 macrophages 397
tracks respectively. Data represented as mean ± SD, P-values were determined using Mann-398
Whitney t-test. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. H Timed screenshots of a Two-Photon z-stack 15 399
minutes time-lapse of an mpeg1.1:RFP A20;A20+/+ and mpeg1.1:RFP A20;A20+/∆127 zebrafish. 400
The tracks show the path taken by a representative macrophage expressing RFP. The chosen 401
macrophages are the closest to the average tracking data. 402
403
Figure 4 The impact of human A20 mutants on A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish survival. 404
A Survival data for A20+/+, A20+/∆127 and A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish at 3 wpf with ectopic 405
administration of WT A20 (ref-hA20) or the C103A, S381A or C243Y mutants. Numbers indicate 406
number of genotyped survivors expressing the respective human gene variant. Each box indicates 407
the survivors from an independent experiment. Survival frequency data is represented in the pie 408
chart. N indicates the total number of zebrafish embryos injected for each A20 mutant. B NF-κB 409
luciferase assay for HEK293 cells transiently non-transfected (NTC), or co-transfected with WT 410
human-A20 or the C103A, S381A or C243Y mutant and treated with or without hTNFα. Data 411
represented as mean ± SD. Each dot represents an individual experiment and are representative of 412
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
N = 3-5 experiments per A20 mutant. Below is shown a representative Western blot for each A20 413
mutant. The displayed gel has been cropped to improve clarity and conciseness of the figure. 414
415
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
MATERIALS AND METHODS 416
Zebrafish 417
Fertilized eggs were collected from zebrafish (Danio rerio) group matings and incubated at 28.5 418
°C at a density <60 embryos in ~25 mL E3 egg water. Adult zebrafish were maintained under 419
standard conditions at 28.5 °C and pH 7-8 at a density of 5-10 fish L-1 under a photoperiodic cycle 420
of 14/10 light/dark hours. Genotyping was performed by fin clipping and HotSHOT DNA 421
extraction 59,60 followed by High Resolution Melting assay. Animal studies were approved by the 422
Garvan/St Vincent's Animal Ethics Committee. All procedures performed complied with the 423
Australian Code of Practice for Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. 424
425
Genomic structure of A20 426
HiC data (40Kb resolution) corresponding to H1 cells were visualized in the 3D genome browser 427 61 (hg19 genome assembly). Layered H3K27ac ChIP-seq data from seven cell lines (GM12878, 428
H1-hESC, HSMM, HUVEC, K562, NHEK, NHLF), available through the UCSC genome browser 429 62 were generated by the ENCODE consortium (2012). Zebrafish 24hpf embryo H3K27ac ChIP-430
seq reads were mapped by Bowtie 63 to unique genomic positions, followed by duplicate removal. 431
Mapped ChIP-seq reads were visualized in WIG format as previously described 64 utilising the 432
UCSC genome browser. 433
434
Tnfaip3 knockout line 435
A pair of TALENs targeting zebrafish tnfaip3 (A20) exon 2 were generated using “PLATINUM 436
Gate TALEN Kit” (Addgene, #1000000043). 0.2 ng of mRNA encoding the TALEN pair was 437
delivered into the cytoplasm of wild-type zebrafish embryos at the one-cell stage. Founders were 438
genotyped using the following primers: zfA20_Fw: AGTATCTGCTGGGGGTTCAGGA and 439
zfA20_Rev: CACCGCATGCAGAGCTT. Subsequently a founder line was identified harbouring 440
a 20 bp deletion in exon 2 with a predicted stop codon at amino acid 127. The tnfaip3dGI4 A20-441
deficient line was maintained in the heterozygous state (tnfaip3∆127/tnfaip3+) and crossed to the 442
zebrafish reporter lines described below. 443
444
Zebrafish reporter lines 445
The lck:RFP (TgBAC(lck:RFP)vcc4) and mpeg1.1:RFP (TgBAC(mpeg1.1:RFP)vcc7) reporter lines 446
have been described previously 36. The lymphocyte protein tyrosine kinase (lck) promoter targets 447
gene expression to T cells whereas macrophage expressed gene 1.1 (mpeg1.1) promoter targets 448
gene expression to macrophages. 449
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
The Tg(ins:dsRed)m1081;Tg(fabp10:dsRed;ela3l:GFP)gz12 line, known as 2-Color Liver Insulin 450
acinar Pancreas (2CLIP) fish line, has been described previously 65. This fish express dsRed 451
fluorescent protein both in the hepatocytes, driven by the fatty acid binding protein 10 (fabp10 452
gene), and in the islets of the endocrine pancreas, driven by the insulin promoter (insulin gene). 453
The exocrine pancreas instead expresses GFP driven by the pancreas specific transcriptor factor 454
1a (ptf1a gene). The Tg(NF-κB, c-FOS:EGFP)GI5 zebrafish line was generated using the Tol2 455
system to insert a DNA fragment containing six repeats of an NF-κB binding site in tandem with 456
a minimal c-Fos promoter that drive the expression of eGFP, followed by an SV40 polyadenylation 457
signal sequence (SV40pA) 24. 458
459
Fluorescence quantification through ImageJ 460
Live zebrafish were placed in a gel solution (1x E3 solution, 3% methyl cellulose, 5% Tricaine), 461
in a 150 mm petri dish lid. Fish were placed on the left side up. Images were processed using 462
ImageJ (v.1.50b). In the case of the NF-κB:eGFP line fluorescence measurements, an outline of 463
the fish was drawn by hand, excluding the yolk sack due to its auto fluorescence. Measurement 464
values of area (pixel/inch) and integrated density (area × mean grey value) were recorded for each 465
of the measured fish. Background value was subtracted to the fish intensity value. 466
467
NF-κB and JNK reporter assays 468
The NF-κB reporter assay was conducted exactly as described previously 19. In brief, human 469
Embryonic Kidney 293T (HEK293T) cells 66 were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified 470
Eagle's medium (DMEM) and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 and kept at a passage number between 471
21-40 for experiments. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoScientific 472
#11668019) with β-galactosidase (β-gal) and NF-κB.Luc with either ‘empty’ pcDNA3.1 vector 473
(NTC; non template control) or pcDNA3.1 encoding wild-type human-A20 or either the A20 474
mutant Cys103Ala or Ser38Ala. HEK293T cells were stimulated with 300 U/ml of recombinant 475
human TNFα (RandD Systems, Minneapolis, MN; #210-TA) for 8 hours. To assess the effect of 476
A20 mutants on JNK signalling, HEK293T cells which constitutively expresses mCherry Kinase 477
Translocation Reporter (mCherryKTR) which translocates from the nucleus to the cytoplasm when 478
phosphorylated by JNK were used (de la Cova, Townley et al. 2017). JNK activity was determined 479
by measuring the ratio between nucleus and cytoplasmic mCherry in cells transiently transfected 480
with human-A20 mutants (using JetPRIME reagent) following human TNFα stimulation. Each 481
experiment included automated cell imaging (Thermo Scientific Cellomics Arrayscan machine) of 482
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
~150, 000 to ~350, 000 individual cells per well in duplicate wells over a period of 60 minutes (5 483
minutes intervals). 484
485
Generation of A20 mutants for ectopic expression in zebrafish 486
Two A20 mutants were generated for this study. Mutations were introduced into cDNA encoding 487
full length human A20 by site directed mutagenesis to cause an alanine substitution at position 488
Cys103 (C103A) and at Ser381 (S381A). Wild type A20 or either mutant C103A or S381A A20-489
cDNA were cloned into the expression cassette Ubb-[A20 insert]-P2A-EGFP and ~100 ng/µl of 490
DNA was co-injected with I-SceI meganuclease to promote random integration in the zebrafish 491
genome. Glass needles for zebrafish eggs injections were prepared from glass capillary tubes with 492
filament (ø1 mm × 90 mm) (WPI #1B100F-3) using a NARISHIGE dual-stage micropipette puller 493
PC-10 machine. The injections were all performed between the one and two-cell stage of 494
development. 495
496
Two-photon intravital microscopy 497
Two-photon imaging was performed using an upright Zeiss 7MP two-photon microscope (Carl 498
Zeiss) with a W Plan-Apochromat 20×/1.0 DIC (UV) Vis-IR water immersion objective. Four 499
external NDDs were used to detect blue (SP 485), green (BP 500-550), red (BP 565-610) and far 500
red (BP 640-710). High repetition rate femtosecond pulsed excitation was provided by a 501
Chameleon Vision II Ti:Sa laser (Coherent Scientific) with 690-1064nm tuning range. We 502
acquired 3µm z-steps at 512×512 pixels and resolution 0.83µm/pixel at a frame rate of 10 fps and 503
dwell time of 1.27 µs/pixel using bidirectional scanning. Intravital two-photon microscopy was 504
performed by embedding 1wpf zebrafish in 1% low melting point agarose in E3 water and 0.4% 505
Tricaine to limit the overall tissue drifting and motility of the fish. 506
507
Image processing and data analysis 508
Raw image files were processed using Imaris (Bitplane) software. A Gaussian filter was applied 509
to reduce background noise. Tracking was performed using Imaris spot detection function to locate 510
the centroid of cells. Motility parameters such as cell displacement (or track length calculated as 511
the total length of displacements within the track) were obtained using Imaris Statistics function. 512
513
Statistical analysis 514
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
Data were analysed as appropriate using a nonparametric Mann-Whitney test, a Whelch t-test, 515
Area under the curve (AUC) or a one-way ANOVA test. Statistical analyses were carried out using 516
GraphPad Prism v7.0. In all cases, the significance threshold was set at p £ 0.05. 517
518
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
ONLINE SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 519
520
Figure S1. Genomic structure of the TNFAIP3 (A20) locus. 521
A HiC data (H1 cells) visualized over the A20 locus, overlapping A20 SNPs and H3K27ac ChIP-522
seq signal. Insets correspond to three evolutionarily-conserved (PhyloP, vertebrate conservation) 523
A20 SNPs, which coincide with the regulatory H3K27ac mark. The alternating yellow and pink 524
shaded areas are predicted Topologically associated domains (TADs), whereas the heatmap 525
(white-red) represents normalised interaction frequency, as described in (Wang, Song et al. 2018). 526
The SNP IDs for SNPs with insets in the figure are (from left to right on the figure): a) 527
chr6:138085249-138085249 (rs7753394), b) chr6:138085366-138085366 (rs7773904), c) 528
chr6:138132517-138132517 (rs10499197). B H3K27ac ChIP-seq (24 hpf embryos) visualized 529
over the A20 locus. Dark boxes represent human-fish DNA sequence conservation. 530
531
Figure S2. Protein homology of TNFAIP3 across multiple vertebrate lineages 532
The consensus sequence (cons) below each amino acid reports an “*” (asterisk) when all the amino 533
acids are the same, a “:” (colon) indicates conservation between groups of strongly similar 534
properties and a “.” (period) indicates conservation between groups of weakly similar properties. 535
The amino acids comprising the OTU domain catalytic triad (Asp70, Cys103, His256) and position 536
Ser381 are also shown. Note these two protein motifs are explicitly conserved across species. 537
538
Figure S3. Validation of A20 deletion in TALEN targeted zebrafish 539
A HRMA curves (derivative on the left and raw-melt on the right) showing the three possible 540
genotypes arising from a cross between two A20+/∆127. The trace for a zebrafish carrying either 541
A20 wild type alleles (Blue), or heterozygous (Green) or homozygous (Red) for the mutant A20 542
allele are shown. B Shows sequence trace and alignment for a zebrafish carrying either the A20 543
wild type A20 allele or the deletion. C Shows PCR amplification of the TALEN targeted region 544
of the A20 gene for A20+/+, A20+/∆127 and A20∆127/∆127 zebrafish. The displayed gel has been 545
cropped to improve clarity and conciseness of the figure. 546
547
Figure S4. Co-localisation of NF-κB and MPEG1 reporter signals in zebrafish 548
Two-photon microscopy 3D-volume of a double reporter (NF-κB:eGFP;mpeg1.1:RFP) A20+/+. 549
Below are shown each individual channel and the merge to demonstrate colocalization of the two 550
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
markers and highlighted by dotted white lines circling the cells where colocalization occurrs. 551
Image supplemented by video file (Video S3). 552
553
Figure S5. Control Data for A20-dependent JNK inhibition and in vivo gene expression 554
A Relative fluorescence units, corrected for fish size. No statistical significance was observed 555
between groups of fish injected with different human A20-EGFP constructs. B Impact of A20 556
variants in mammalian cells. JNK activation kinetics for HEK293 cells transiently non-transfected 557
(NTC), or co-transfected with WT human-A20 or the C103A, S381A or C243Y mutant and treated 558
with or without hTNFα for 1 hour and quantified at 5 minutes intervals. Data shows the ratio of 559
Cytoplasm over Nuclear (C/N) JNK activation, represented as mean ± standard error. C Data from 560
the 15 min time point for all A20 variants is represented in heat map format. Statistical analysis 561
carried as Area Under the Curve (AUC) compared to WT hA20. WT and NTC = ****P < 0.0001, 562
WT and S381A or C243Y = *P < 0.05. The data on this graph have been generated by three 563
independent experiments. 564
565
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
REFERENCES 566
567
568
569
570
1 Lee, E. G. Failure to Regulate TNF-Induced NF-kappa B and Cell Death 571
Responses in A20-Deficient Mice. Science 289, 2350-2354, 572
doi:10.1126/science.289.5488.2350 (2000). 573
2 Cooper, J. T. et al. A20 blocks endothelial cell activation through a NF-kappaB-574
dependent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 18068-18073 (1996). 575
3 Grey, S. T., Arvelo, M. B., Hasenkamp, W., Bach, F. H. & Ferran, C. A20 inhibits 576
cytokine-induced apoptosis and nuclear factor kappaB-dependent gene activation 577
in islets. J. Exp. Med. 190, 1135-1146 (1999). 578
4 Song, H. Y., Rothe, M. & Goeddel, D. V. The tumor necrosis factor-inducible 579
zinc finger protein A20 interacts with TRAF1/TRAF2 and inhibits NF-kappaB 580
activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6721-6725 (1996). 581
5 Jaattela, M., Mouritzen, H., Elling, F. & Bastholm, L. A20 zinc finger protein 582
inhibits TNF and IL-1 signaling. J. Immunol. 156, 1166-1173 (1996). 583
6 Dixit, V. M. et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induction of novel gene products 584
in human endothelial cells including a macrophage-specific chemotaxin. J. Biol. 585
Chem. 265, 2973-2978 (1990). 586
7 Shigemura, T. et al. Novel heterozygous C243Y A20/TNFAIP3 gene mutation is 587
responsible for chronic inflammation in autosomal-dominant Behcet's disease. 588
RMD Open 2, e000223, doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000223 (2016). 589
8 Zhu, L. et al. Characteristics of A20 gene polymorphisms and clinical significance 590
in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Transl. Med. 13, 215, doi:10.1186/s12967-591
015-0566-1 (2015). 592
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
9 Boone, D. L. et al. The ubiquitin-modifying enzyme A20 is required for 593
termination of Toll-like receptor responses. Nat. Immunol. 5, 1052-1060, 594
doi:10.1038/ni1110 (2004). 595
10 Ma, A. & Malynn, B. A. A20: linking a complex regulator of ubiquitylation to 596
immunity and human disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 774-785, 597
doi:10.1038/nri3313 (2012). 598
11 Vereecke, L., Beyaert, R. & van Loo, G. Genetic relationships between 599
A20/TNFAIP3, chronic inflammation and autoimmune disease. Biochem. Soc. 600
Trans. 39, 1086-1091, doi:10.1042/bst0391086 (2011). 601
12 Wertz, I. E. et al. De-ubiquitination and ubiquitin ligase domains of A20 602
downregulate NF-kappaB signalling. Nature 430, 694-699, 603
doi:10.1038/nature02794 (2004). 604
13 Zammit, N. W. et al. Denisovan, modern human and mouse TNFAIP3 alleles tune 605
A20 phosphorylation and immunity. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1299-1310, 606
doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0492-0 (2019). 607
14 Skaug, B. et al. Direct, noncatalytic mechanism of IKK inhibition by A20. Mol. 608
Cell 44, 559-571, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.015 (2011). 609
15 Evans, P. C. et al. Zinc-finger protein A20, a regulator of inflammation and cell 610
survival, has de-ubiquitinating activity. Biochem. J. 378, 727-734, 611
doi:10.1042/bj20031377 (2004). 612
16 Shembade, N., Ma, A. & Harhaj, E. W. Inhibition of NF-kappaB signaling by A20 613
through disruption of ubiquitin enzyme complexes. Science 327, 1135-1139, 614
doi:10.1126/science.1182364 (2010). 615
17 Polykratis, A. et al. A20 prevents inflammasome-dependent arthritis by inhibiting 616
macrophage necroptosis through its ZnF7 ubiquitin-binding domain. Nat. Cell 617
Biol. 21, 731-742, doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0324-3 (2019). 618
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
18 Krikos, A., Laherty, C. D. & Dixit, V. M. Transcriptional activation of the tumor 619
necrosis factor alpha-inducible zinc finger protein, A20, is mediated by kappa B 620
elements. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17971-17976 (1992). 621
19 Liuwantara, D. et al. Nuclear factor-kappaB regulates beta-cell death: a critical 622
role for A20 in beta-cell protection. Diabetes 55, 2491-2501, doi:10.2337/db06-623
0142 (2006). 624
20 Hutti, J. E. et al. IkappaB kinase beta phosphorylates the K63 deubiquitinase A20 625
to cause feedback inhibition of the NF-kappaB pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 7451-626
7461, doi:10.1128/mcb.01101-07 (2007). 627
21 Wertz, I. E. et al. Phosphorylation and linear ubiquitin direct A20 inhibition of 628
inflammation. Nature 528, 370-375, doi:10.1038/nature16165 (2015). 629
22 Lu, T. T. et al. Dimerization and ubiquitin mediated recruitment of A20, a 630
complex deubiquitinating enzyme. Immunity 38, 896-905, 631
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.03.008 (2013). 632
23 Correa, R. G. et al. Characterization of NF-kappa B/I kappa B proteins in zebra 633
fish and their involvement in notochord development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 5257-634
5268, doi:10.1128/mcb.24.12.5257-5268.2004 (2004). 635
24 Kanther, M. et al. Microbial Colonization Induces Dynamic Temporal and Spatial 636
Patterns of NF-κB Activation in the Zebrafish Digestive Tract. Gastroenterology 637
141, 197-207, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.042 (2011). 638
25 Novoa, B., Bowman, T. V., Zon, L. & Figueras, A. LPS response and tolerance 639
in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Fish Shellfish Immunol 26, 326-331, 640
doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2008.12.004 (2009). 641
26 Creyghton, M. P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers 642
and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 21931-643
21936, doi:10.1073/pnas.1016071107 (2010). 644
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
27 Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early 645
developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279-283, 646
doi:10.1038/nature09692 (2011). 647
28 Komander, D. & Barford, D. Structure of the A20 OTU domain and mechanistic 648
insights into deubiquitination. Biochem. J. 409, 77-85, doi:10.1042/BJ20071399 649
(2008). 650
29 Phelan, P. E., Mellon, M. T. & Kim, C. H. Functional characterization of full-651
length TLR3, IRAK-4, and TRAF6 in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Mol. Immunol. 42, 652
1057-1071, doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2004.11.005 (2005). 653
30 Matmati, M. et al. A20 (TNFAIP3) deficiency in myeloid cells triggers erosive 654
polyarthritis resembling rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 43, 908-912, 655
doi:10.1038/ng.874 (2011). 656
31 Her, G. M., Chiang, C. C., Chen, W. Y. & Wu, J. L. In vivo studies of liver-type 657
fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) gene expression in liver of transgenic 658
zebrafish (Danio rerio). FEBS Lett. 538, 125-133 (2003). 659
32 Ellett, F., Pase, L., Hayman, J. W., Andrianopoulos, A. & Lieschke, G. J. mpeg1 660
promoter transgenes direct macrophage-lineage expression in zebrafish. Blood 661
117, e49-56, doi:10.1182/blood-2010-10-314120 (2011). 662
33 Wittamer, V., Bertrand, J. Y., Gutschow, P. W. & Traver, D. Characterization of 663
the mononuclear phagocyte system in zebrafish. Blood 117, 7126-7135, 664
doi:10.1182/blood-2010-11-321448 (2011). 665
34 Benard, E. L. et al. Macrophage-expressed perforins mpeg1 and mpeg1.2 have an 666
anti-bacterial function in zebrafish. J. Innate Immun. 7, 136-152, 667
doi:10.1159/000366103 (2015). 668
35 Herbomel, P., Thisse, B. & Thisse, C. Ontogeny and behaviour of early 669
macrophages in the zebrafish embryo. Development 126, 3735-3745 (1999). 670
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
36 Sugimoto, K., Hui, S. P., Sheng, D. Z., Nakayama, M. & Kikuchi, K. Zebrafish 671
FOXP3 is required for the maintenance of immune tolerance. Dev. Comp. 672
Immunol. 73, 156-162, doi:10.1016/j.dci.2017.03.023 (2017). 673
37 Kigerl, K. A. et al. Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with 674
divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse 675
spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 29, 13435-13444, doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3257-09.2009 676
(2009). 677
38 Jablonski, K. A. et al. Novel Markers to Delineate Murine M1 and M2 678
Macrophages. PLoS ONE 10, e0145342, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145342 679
(2015). 680
39 Renshaw, S. A. et al. A transgenic zebrafish model of neutrophilic inflammation. 681
Blood 108, 3976-3978, doi:10.1182/blood-2006-05-024075 (2006). 682
40 Grabher, C. & Wittbrodt, J. Meganuclease and transposon mediated transgenesis 683
in medaka. Genome Biol. 8, 1-7, doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-s1-s10 (2007). 684
41 Soroldoni, D., Hogan, B. M. & Oates, A. C. in Zebrafish: Methods and Protocols 685
(eds J. Graham Lieschke, C. Andrew Oates, & Koichi Kawakami) 117-130 686
(Humana Press, 2009). 687
42 Hoshijima, K., Jurynec, Michael J. & Grunwald, David J. Precise Editing of the 688
Zebrafish Genome Made Simple and Efficient. Dev. Cell 36, 654-667, 689
doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.015 (2016). 690
43 Zhou, Q. et al. Loss-of-function mutations in TNFAIP3 leading to A20 691
haploinsufficiency cause an early-onset autoinflammatory disease. Nat. Genet. 692
48, 67-73, doi:10.1038/ng.3459 (2016). 693
44 Beg, A. A., Sha, W. C., Bronson, R. T., Ghosh, S. & Baltimore, D. Embryonic 694
lethality and liver degeneration in mice lacking the RelA component of NF-kappa 695
B. Nature 376, 167-170, doi:10.1038/376167a0 (1995). 696
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
45 Yuan, S. et al. Emergence of the A20/ABIN-mediated inhibition of NF-kappaB 697
signaling via modifying the ubiquitinated proteins in a basal chordate. Proc. Natl. 698
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 6720-6725, doi:10.1073/pnas.1321187111 (2014). 699
46 Smith, J. J. et al. The sea lamprey germline genome provides insights into 700
programmed genome rearrangement and vertebrate evolution. Nat. Genet. 50, 701
270-277, doi:10.1038/s41588-017-0036-1 (2018). 702
47 Dushay, M. S., Asling, B. & Hultmark, D. Origins of immunity: Relish, a 703
compound Rel-like gene in the antibacterial defense of Drosophila. Proc. Natl. 704
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10343-10347, doi:10.1073/pnas.93.19.10343 (1996). 705
48 Catrysse, L., Vereecke, L., Beyaert, R. & van Loo, G. A20 in inflammation and 706
autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 35, 22-31, doi:10.1016/j.it.2013.10.005 (2014). 707
49 De, A., Dainichi, T., Rathinam, C. V. & Ghosh, S. The deubiquitinase activity of 708
A20 is dispensable for NF-kappaB signaling. EMBO Rep. 15, 775-783, 709
doi:10.15252/embr.201338305 (2014). 710
50 Duncan, C. J. A. et al. Early-onset autoimmune disease due to a heterozygous 711
loss-of-function mutation in TNFAIP3 (A20). Ann. Rheum. Dis., 712
doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210944 (2017). 713
51 Li, G. M. et al. Expanding the spectrum of A20 haploinsufficiency in two Chinese 714
families: cases report. BMC Med Genet 20, 124, doi:10.1186/s12881-019-0856-1 715
(2019). 716
52 Chu, Y. et al. B cells lacking the tumor suppressor TNFAIP3/A20 display 717
impaired differentiation and hyperactivation and cause inflammation and 718
autoimmunity in aged mice. Blood 117, 2227-2236, doi:10.1182/blood-2010-09-719
306019 (2011). 720
53 Heger, K. et al. A20-deficient mast cells exacerbate inflammatory responses in 721
vivo. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001762, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001762 (2014). 722
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
54 Nagamachi, A. et al. Acquired deficiency of A20 results in rapid apoptosis, 723
systemic inflammation, and abnormal hematopoietic stem cell function. PLoS 724
ONE 9, e87425, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087425 (2014). 725
55 Nakagawa, M. M., Thummar, K., Mandelbaum, J., Pasqualucci, L. & Rathinam, 726
C. V. Lack of the ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20 results in loss of hematopoietic 727
stem cell quiescence. J. Exp. Med., doi:10.1084/jem.20132544 (2015). 728
56 Eleftherohorinou, H. et al. Pathway analysis of GWAS provides new insights into 729
genetic susceptibility to 3 inflammatory diseases. PLoS ONE 4, e8068, 730
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008068 (2009). 731
57 Vereecke, L. et al. A20 controls intestinal homeostasis through cell-specific 732
activities. Nat. Commun. 5, 5103, doi:10.1038/ncomms6103 (2014). 733
58 Graham, R. R. et al. Genetic variants near TNFAIP3 on 6q23 are associated with 734
systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Genet. 40, 1059-1061, doi:10.1038/ng.200 735
(2008). 736
59 Meeker, N. D., Hutchinson, S. A., Ho, L. & Trede, N. S. Method for isolation of 737
PCR-ready genomic DNA from zebrafish tissues. Biotechniques 43, 610, 612, 614 738
(2007). 739
60 Thomsen, N., Ali, R. G., Ahmed, J. N. & Arkell, R. M. High resolution melt 740
analysis (HRMA); a viable alternative to agarose gel electrophoresis for mouse 741
genotyping. PLoS ONE 7, e45252, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045252 (2012). 742
61 Wang, Y. et al. The 3D Genome Browser: a web-based browser for visualizing 743
3D genome organization and long-range chromatin interactions. Genome Biol. 19, 744
151, doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1519-9 (2018). 745
62 Kent, W. J. et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996-746
1006, doi:10.1101/gr.229102 (2002). 747
63 Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-748
efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 749
10, R25, doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 (2009). 750
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
64 Bogdanovic, O. et al. Dynamics of enhancer chromatin signatures mark the 751
transition from pluripotency to cell specification during embryogenesis. Genome 752
Res. 22, 2043-2053, doi:10.1101/gr.134833.111 (2012). 753
65 Farooq, M. et al. Histone deacetylase 3 (hdac3) is specifically required for liver 754
development in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 317, 336-353, 755
doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.034 (2008). 756
66 Graham, F. L., Smiley, J., Russell, W. C. & Nairn, R. Characteristics of a human 757
cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5. J. Gen. Virol. 36, 758
59-74, doi:10.1099/0022-1317-36-1-59 (1977). 759
760
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
A B
C
D E
F G
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
Rel
ativ
e flu
ores
cenc
e un
its (R
FU) ***
**
N = 46 66 34
Mean RFU = 74.31 91.11 100.7
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Rel
ativ
e flu
ores
cenc
e un
its (R
FU)
LPS N = 11 32 33 32 19 18
***
********
****
A20∆127/∆127;NF-κB:EGFP
A20+/∆127;NF-κB:EGFP
A20+/+;NF-κB:EGFP
Mean RFU = 227.6 268.8 226.3 297.8 296.4 401.3
- + - + - +- - - LPS
a
a
b
b
c
c
d
d
A20+/+;NF-κB:EGFP
3dpf
6dpf
NO
LP
S
LP
S
[75 μ
g/m
l]
A20∆127/∆127;NF-κB:EGFPA20+/∆127;NF-κB:EGFPA20+/+;NF-κB:EGFP
A20+/+
A20∆127/∆127
TALEN target site
OTU 1 2 3 4 5
GGGAATTGCCTGCTTCACGCAGCGTCTCAGTATCTGCTGGGGGTTCAG- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GAAAGCTCTGCATGCGGTGCTGAAGGAAACGGACACGACTGATTTCCT*
GGGAATTGCCTGCTTCACGCAGCGTCTCAGTATCTGCTGGGGGTTCAGGACACAGATCTGGTGCTGAGGAAAGCTCTGCATGCGGTGCTGAAGGAAACGGACACGACTGATTTCCT
0h 30min0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Rela
tive
expr
essio
n to
β-a
ctin
*
Rela
tive
expr
essio
n to
β-a
ctin
0h 30min0
1
2
3
4
5 **
0h 1h0
1
2
3
4
5 *
0h 1h0
2
4
6
8
10 **
zf A20 zf TNFα zf IL1β zf IL6
Rela
tive
expr
essio
n to
β-a
ctin
Rela
tive
expr
essio
n to
β-a
ctin
Rela
tive
expr
essio
n to
β-a
ctin
Rela
tive
expr
essio
n to
β-a
ctin
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 40123456789
10
zf A20
zf IL1βzf IL-6
zf TNFα
Time post LPS stimulation (hours)
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
B C
D E
A
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
(Body a
rea/L
iver
are
a)
***
1 2Weeks post-fertilization
***
*
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Body a
rea (
pix
el/i
nch)
****
1 2Weeks post-fertilization
****
DA
PI
dsR
ED
Ca
sp
ase
-3
A20+/+;2CLIP A20+/∆127;2CLIP A20∆127/∆127;2CLIP
A20+/+;2CLIP
A20+/∆127;2CLIP
A20∆127/∆127;2CLIP
1 2 3 80
20
40
60
80
100
Age (weeks)
Observ
ed g
enoty
pe % 24.5
52.5
23
12.9
55.8
31.3
56.5
43.5
59.1
40.9
N = 322 - 294 - 62 - 22
A20∆127/∆127
A20+/∆127
A20+/+
A20∆127/∆127
A20+/∆127
A20+/+
A20∆127/∆127
A20+/+
A20∆127/∆127
A20+/∆127
A20+/+
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
lck:R
FP
mpeg1.1
:RF
PN
F-ĸ
B:E
GF
P
A20∆127/∆127A20+/∆127A20+/+
DA
PI
0
10
20
30
1 week post-fertilization
T-c
ells
/ b
ody s
ize r
atio
*******
N = 20 34 23
A20+/+;lck:RFP
A20+/∆127;lck:RFP
A20∆127/∆127;lck:RFP
0
10
20
30
1 week post-fertilization
Macro
phages / b
ody s
ize r
atio A20+/+;mpeg1.1:RFP
A20+/∆127;mpeg1.1:RFP
A20∆127/∆127;mpeg1.1:RFP
********
N = 21 38 19
A20+/+;mpeg1.1:RFP
A20+/∆127;mpeg1.1:RFP
µm
/s
N = 68 98
A20+/+;mpeg1.1:RFP
A20∆127/∆127;mpeg1.1:RFP
A20+/+;lck:RFP
A20∆127/∆127;lck:RFP
A B
E F
G H
C D
mpeg1.1:RFP
NF-ĸB:EGFP
Collagen:SHG
COLOCALIZATION
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25****
mpeg1.1:RFPNF-ĸB:EGFPCollagen:SHG A20+/+
mpeg1.1:RFPNF-ĸB:EGFP Colocalization
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
A B
C D
E
A20 (90 kDa)
β-actin (42 kDa)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
NF
-κB
relat
ive flu
ores
cenc
e un
its
NTC hA20WT C103A S381A
hTNFα
****
- + - + - + - +
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Time post-stimulation (min)
C/N
ratio
NTC
hA20WT
S381A
C103A
15 m
in
NTC
S381A
C103A
hA20WT
Low
High
JNK activatio
n
hA20WT C103A S381A-
A20+/+ = 27
A20+/∆127 = 35
A20∆127/∆127 = 0
A20+/+ = 9
A20+/∆127 = 13
A20∆127/∆127 = 0
A20+/+ = 7
A20+/∆127 = 9
A20∆127/∆127 = 3
A20+/+ = 13
A20+/∆127 = 24
A20∆127/∆127 = 4
A20+/+ = 16
A20+/∆127 = 21
A20∆127/∆127 = 3
A20+/+ = 24
A20+/∆127 = 47
A20∆127/∆127 = 5
A20+/+ = 5
A20+/∆127 = 4
A20∆127/∆127 = 1
A20+/+ = 7
A20+/∆127 = 7
A20∆127/∆127 = 2
A20+/+ = 18
A20+/∆127 = 25
A20∆127/∆127 = 2
A20+/+ = 7
A20+/∆127 = 23
A20∆127/∆127 = 8
A20+/+ = 5
A20+/∆127 = 24
A20∆127/∆127 = 0
A20+/+ = 8
A20+/∆127 = 28
A20∆127/∆127 = 4
A20+/+ = 18
A20+/∆127 = 26
A20∆127/∆127 = 1
A20+/+ = 16
A20+/∆127 = 26
A20∆127/∆127 = 1
3.64% A20+/+
A20+/∆127
A20∆127/∆127
N = 162 176 109 157
A20+/+ = 20
A20+/∆127 = 34
A20∆127/∆127 = 0
A20+/+ = 8
A20+/∆127 = 16
A20∆127/∆127 = 0
37.96%
62.04% 55.06%
35.03%
9.91%
49.96%
38.04%
12%
67.75%
28.61%
40
100
100
130
100
130
hA
20
WT
A20 (Ms)
P-S381-A20 (Rb)
IκKβ
β-actin
S381A
PCDNA
- hTNFα + hTNFα
DA
PI
P6
5
hA20WT
- hTNFα + hTNFα
C103A
- hTNFα + hTNFα
S381A
- hTNFα + hTNFα
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint
0
10
20
30
40
m
TRACK DISPLACEMENT
**** A20+/+;mpeg1.1:RFP
A20+/∆127;mpeg1.1:RFP
0
20
40
60
80
100
m
TRACK LENGTH
**** A20+/+;mpeg1.1:RFP
0
200
400
600
800
1000
seconds
TRACK DURATION
** A20+/+;mpeg1.1:RFP
A20+/∆127;mpeg1.1:RFP
A
B
C
A20+/∆127;mpeg1.1:RFP
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under apreprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 25, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961763doi: bioRxiv preprint